1
|
Palumbo P, Martinese A, Antenucci MR, Granata V, Fusco R, De Muzio F, Brunese MC, Bicci E, Bruno A, Bruno F, Giovagnoni A, Gandolfo N, Miele V, Di Cesare E, Manetta R. Diffusion kurtosis imaging and standard diffusion imaging in the magnetic resonance imaging assessment of prostate cancer. Gland Surg 2023; 12:1806-1822. [PMID: 38229839 PMCID: PMC10788566 DOI: 10.21037/gs-23-53] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
Background and Objective In recent years, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown excellent results in the study of the prostate gland. MRI has indeed shown to be advantageous in the prostate cancer (PCa) detection, as in guiding targeting biopsy, improving its diagnostic yield. Although current acquisition protocols provide for multiparametric acquisition, recent evidence has shown that biparametric protocols can be non-inferior in PCa detection. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequence, in particular, plays a key role, particularly in the peripheral zone which accounts for the larger part of the prostate. High b-values are generally recommended, although with the possibility of obtaining non-Gaussian diffusion effects, which requires a more sophisticated model for the analysis, namely through the diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI). Purpose of this narrative review was to analyze the current applications and clinical evidence regarding the use of DKI with a main focus on PCa detection, also in comparison with DWI. Methods This narrative review synthesized the findings of literature retrieved from main researches, narrative and systematic reviews, and meta-analyses obtained from PubMed. Key Content and Findings DKI analyses the non-Gaussian water diffusivity and describe the effect of signal intensity decay related to high b-value through two main metrics (Dapp and Kapp). Differently from DWI-apparent diffusion coefficient (DWI-ADC) which reflects only water restriction outside of cells, DKI metrics are supposed to represent also the direct interaction of water molecules with cell membranes and intracellular compounds. This review describes current evidence on ADC and DKI metrics in clinical imaging, and finally collect the results derived from the main articles focused on DWI and DKI models in detecting PCa. Conclusions DKI advantages, compared to conventional ADC analysis, still remain controversial. Wider application and greater technical knowledge of DKI, however, may help in proving its intrinsic validity in the field of oncology and therefore in the study of clinically significant PCa. Finally, a deep understanding of DKI is important for radiologists to better understand what Kapp and Dapp mean in the context of different cancer and how these metrics may vary specifically in PCa imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierpaolo Palumbo
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Area of Cardiovascular and Interventional Imaging, Abruzzo Health Unit 1, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Andrea Martinese
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Maria Rosaria Antenucci
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, “Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli”, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Federica De Muzio
- Diagnostic Imaging Section, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences & Neurosciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Brunese
- Diagnostic Imaging Section, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences & Neurosciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Eleonora Bicci
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University Hospital Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Alessandra Bruno
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, Ancona, Italy
| | - Federico Bruno
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Area of Cardiovascular and Interventional Imaging, Abruzzo Health Unit 1, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Andrea Giovagnoni
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, Ancona, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Gandolfo
- Diagnostic Imaging Department, Villa Scassi Hospital-ASL 3, Genoa, Italy
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Milan, Italy
| | - Vittorio Miele
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University Hospital Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Ernesto Di Cesare
- Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Rosa Manetta
- Radiology Unit, San Salvatore Hospital, Abruzzo Health Unit 1, L’Aquila, Italy
- Prostate Unit, San Salvatore Hospital, Abruzzo Health Unit 1, L’Aquila, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Petrillo A, Fusco R, Barretta ML, Granata V, Mattace Raso M, Porto A, Sorgente E, Fanizzi A, Massafra R, Lafranceschina M, La Forgia D, Trombadori CML, Belli P, Trecate G, Tenconi C, De Santis MC, Greco L, Ferranti FR, De Soccio V, Vidiri A, Botta F, Dominelli V, Cassano E, Boldrini L. Radiomics and artificial intelligence analysis by T2-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to predict Breast Cancer Histological Outcome. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2023; 128:1347-1371. [PMID: 37801198 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-023-01718-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of radiomics features obtained by MR images to predict Breast Cancer Histological Outcome. METHODS A total of 217 patients with malignant lesions were analysed underwent MRI examinations. Considering histological findings as the ground truth, four different types of findings were used in both univariate and multivariate analyses: (1) G1 + G2 vs G3 classification; (2) presence of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2 + vs HER2 -); (3) presence of the hormone receptor (HR + vs HR -); and (4) presence of luminal subtypes of breast cancer. RESULTS The best accuracy for discriminating HER2 + versus HER2 - breast cancers was obtained considering nine predictors by early phase T1-weighted subtraction images and a decision tree (accuracy of 88% on validation set). The best accuracy for discriminating HR + versus HR - breast cancers was obtained considering nine predictors by T2-weighted subtraction images and a decision tree (accuracy of 90% on validation set). The best accuracy for discriminating G1 + G2 versus G3 breast cancers was obtained considering 16 predictors by early phase T1-weighted subtraction images in a linear regression model with an accuracy of 75%. The best accuracy for discriminating luminal versus non-luminal breast cancers was obtained considering 27 predictors by early phase T1-weighted subtraction images and a decision tree (accuracy of 94% on validation set). CONCLUSIONS The combination of radiomics analysis and artificial intelligence techniques could be used to support physician decision-making in prediction of Breast Cancer Histological Outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonella Petrillo
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131, Naples, Italy.
| | - Roberta Fusco
- Medical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 80013, Naples, Italy
| | - Maria Luisa Barretta
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Mauro Mattace Raso
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Annamaria Porto
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Eugenio Sorgente
- Radiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Annarita Fanizzi
- Direzione Scientifica-IRCCS, Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II-Via Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Raffaella Massafra
- SSD Fisica Sanitaria-IRCCS Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II-Via Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Miria Lafranceschina
- Struttura Semplice Dipartimentale di Radiodiagnostica Senologica-IRCCS Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II-Via Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Daniele La Forgia
- Struttura Semplice Dipartimentale di Radiodiagnostica Senologica-IRCCS Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II-Via Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Belli
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanna Trecate
- Department of Radiodiagnostic and Magnetic Resonance, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Tenconi
- Department of Medical Physics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Carmen De Santis
- De Santis Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Greco
- Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Istituto di Ricovero E Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Romana Ferranti
- Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Istituto di Ricovero E Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Valeria De Soccio
- Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Istituto di Ricovero E Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonello Vidiri
- Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Istituto di Ricovero E Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Botta
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Valeria Dominelli
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Enrico Cassano
- Breast Imaging Division, IEO Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Boldrini
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
D’Antona R, Deandrea S, Sestini E, Pau L, Ferrè F, Angiolini C, Bortul M, Bucchi L, Caumo F, Fortunato L, Giordano L, Giordano M, Mantellini P, Martelli I, Melucci G, Naldoni C, Paci E, Saguatti G, Tinterri C, Vainieri M, Cataliotti L. Presence and Role of Associations of Cancer Patients and Volunteers in Specialist Breast Centres: An Italian National Survey of Breast Centres Associated with Senonetwork. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:8186-8195. [PMID: 37754509 PMCID: PMC10529214 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30090594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
This article aims to present the results of a national, cross-sectional, voluntary, online survey on the presence and roles of associations of breast cancer patients and volunteers in Italian specialist breast centres. The survey was developed according to standard methods. The questionnaire was pre-tested by a random sample of three breast centres, loaded onto the SurveyMonkey platform, and piloted by one volunteer breast centre. The breast centre clinical leads were invited to participate via email. A link to the online instrument was provided. No financial incentives were offered. The results were reported using standard descriptive statistics. The response rate was 82/128 (65%). Members of associations were routinely present in 70% Italian breast centres. Breast centres most often reporting their presence were those certified by the European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists. Patient support (reception and information, listening, identification of needs, and psychological support) was the primary area where associations were reported to offer services. The magnitude of this phenomenon warrants a study to investigate the impact of the activities of associations on the quality of life of patients and on the cost-benefit ratio of the service, and the modes of their interactions with the nursing staff and the medical staff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosanna D’Antona
- Europa Donna Italia, 20122 Milan, Italy; (R.D.); (E.S.); (L.P.); (C.N.)
| | - Silvia Deandrea
- Environmental Health Unit, Agency for Health Protection, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
| | | | - Loredana Pau
- Europa Donna Italia, 20122 Milan, Italy; (R.D.); (E.S.); (L.P.); (C.N.)
| | - Francesca Ferrè
- Management and Health Laboratory, Institute of Management, Department EMbeDS, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, 56127 Pisa, Italy; (F.F.); (I.M.); (M.V.)
| | - Catia Angiolini
- SOD Oncologia Della Mammella, Breast Unit, DAI Oncologico, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50134 Firenze, Italy;
| | - Marina Bortul
- Breast Unit, Division of General Surgery, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina, Hospital of Cattinara, 34149 Trieste, Italy;
| | - Lauro Bucchi
- Emilia-Romagna Cancer Registry, Romagna Cancer Institute, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) Dino Amadori, 47014 Meldola, Italy
| | - Francesca Caumo
- Department of Breast Radiology, Veneto Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 35128 Padova, Italy;
| | - Lucio Fortunato
- Breast Centre, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, 00184 Rome, Italy;
| | - Livia Giordano
- CPO Piedmont, AOU Cittá della Salute e della Scienza, 10126 Torino, Italy;
| | - Monica Giordano
- Medical Oncology Department, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Lariana, 22100 Como, Italy;
| | - Paola Mantellini
- Screening Unit, ISPRO—Oncological Network, Prevention and Research Institute, 50139 Firenze, Italy;
| | - Irene Martelli
- Management and Health Laboratory, Institute of Management, Department EMbeDS, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, 56127 Pisa, Italy; (F.F.); (I.M.); (M.V.)
| | - Giuseppe Melucci
- SS Radiologia Senologica, ASL ‘SS. Annunziata’, 74100 Taranto, Italy;
| | - Carlo Naldoni
- Europa Donna Italia, 20122 Milan, Italy; (R.D.); (E.S.); (L.P.); (C.N.)
| | - Eugenio Paci
- Italian Group for Mammography Screening, 50131 Firenze, Italy;
| | - Gianni Saguatti
- Senology Unit, Local Health Authority, 40139 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Corrado Tinterri
- Breast Unit, Humanitas Cancer Centre, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy;
| | - Milena Vainieri
- Management and Health Laboratory, Institute of Management, Department EMbeDS, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, 56127 Pisa, Italy; (F.F.); (I.M.); (M.V.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Catalano O, Fusco R, De Muzio F, Simonetti I, Palumbo P, Bruno F, Borgheresi A, Agostini A, Gabelloni M, Varelli C, Barile A, Giovagnoni A, Gandolfo N, Miele V, Granata V. Recent Advances in Ultrasound Breast Imaging: From Industry to Clinical Practice. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13050980. [PMID: 36900124 PMCID: PMC10000574 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13050980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast ultrasound (US) has undergone dramatic technological improvement through recent decades, moving from a low spatial resolution, grayscale-limited technique to a highly performing, multiparametric modality. In this review, we first focus on the spectrum of technical tools that have become commercially available, including new microvasculature imaging modalities, high-frequency transducers, extended field-of-view scanning, elastography, contrast-enhanced US, MicroPure, 3D US, automated US, S-Detect, nomograms, images fusion, and virtual navigation. In the subsequent section, we discuss the broadened current application of US in breast clinical scenarios, distinguishing among primary US, complementary US, and second-look US. Finally, we mention the still ongoing limitations and the challenging aspects of breast US.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orlando Catalano
- Department of Radiology, Istituto Diagnostico Varelli, 80126 Naples, Italy
| | - Roberta Fusco
- Medical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 80013 Naples, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Federica De Muzio
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
| | - Igino Simonetti
- Division of Radiology, “Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli”, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Pierpaolo Palumbo
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Area of Cardiovascular and Interventional Imaging, Abruzzo Health Unit 1, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Federico Bruno
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Area of Cardiovascular and Interventional Imaging, Abruzzo Health Unit 1, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandra Borgheresi
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Andrea Agostini
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Michela Gabelloni
- Department of Translational Research, Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Carlo Varelli
- Department of Radiology, Istituto Diagnostico Varelli, 80126 Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Barile
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Andrea Giovagnoni
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Gandolfo
- Diagnostic Imaging Department, Villa Scassi Hospital-ASL 3, Corso Scassi 1, 16149 Genoa, Italy
| | - Vittorio Miele
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Department of Emergency Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, “Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli”, 80131 Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Post-Surgical Imaging Assessment in Rectal Cancer: Normal Findings and Complications. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12041489. [PMID: 36836024 PMCID: PMC9966470 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Rectal cancer (RC) is one of the deadliest malignancies worldwide. Surgery is the most common treatment for RC, performed in 63.2% of patients. The type of surgical approach chosen aims to achieve maximum residual function with the lowest risk of recurrence. The selection is made by a multidisciplinary team that assesses the characteristics of the patient and the tumor. Total mesorectal excision (TME), including both low anterior resection (LAR) and abdominoperineal resection (APR), is still the standard of care for RC. Radical surgery is burdened by a 31% rate of major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 3-4), such as anastomotic leaks and a risk of a permanent stoma. In recent years, less-invasive techniques, such as local excision, have been tested. These additional procedures could mitigate the morbidity of rectal resection, while providing acceptable oncologic results. The "watch and wait" approach is not a globally accepted model of care but encouraging results on selected groups of patients make it a promising strategy. In this plethora of treatments, the radiologist is called upon to distinguish a physiological from a pathological postoperative finding. The aim of this narrative review is to identify the main post-surgical complications and the most effective imaging techniques.
Collapse
|
6
|
Giacobbe G, Granata V, Trovato P, Fusco R, Simonetti I, De Muzio F, Cutolo C, Palumbo P, Borgheresi A, Flammia F, Cozzi D, Gabelloni M, Grassi F, Miele V, Barile A, Giovagnoni A, Gandolfo N. Gender Medicine in Clinical Radiology Practice. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13020223. [PMID: 36836457 PMCID: PMC9966684 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13020223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2022] [Revised: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Gender Medicine is rapidly emerging as a branch of medicine that studies how many diseases common to men and women differ in terms of prevention, clinical manifestations, diagnostic-therapeutic approach, prognosis, and psychological and social impact. Nowadays, the presentation and identification of many pathological conditions pose unique diagnostic challenges. However, women have always been paradoxically underestimated in epidemiological studies, drug trials, as well as clinical trials, so many clinical conditions affecting the female population are often underestimated and/or delayed and may result in inadequate clinical management. Knowing and valuing these differences in healthcare, thus taking into account individual variability, will make it possible to ensure that each individual receives the best care through the personalization of therapies, the guarantee of diagnostic-therapeutic pathways declined according to gender, as well as through the promotion of gender-specific prevention initiatives. This article aims to assess potential gender differences in clinical-radiological practice extracted from the literature and their impact on health and healthcare. Indeed, in this context, radiomics and radiogenomics are rapidly emerging as new frontiers of imaging in precision medicine. The development of clinical practice support tools supported by artificial intelligence allows through quantitative analysis to characterize tissues noninvasively with the ultimate goal of extracting directly from images indications of disease aggressiveness, prognosis, and therapeutic response. The integration of quantitative data with gene expression and patient clinical data, with the help of structured reporting as well, will in the near future give rise to decision support models for clinical practice that will hopefully improve diagnostic accuracy and prognostic power as well as ensure a more advanced level of precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuliana Giacobbe
- General and Emergency Radiology Department, “Antonio Cardarelli” Hospital, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Piero Trovato
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Roberta Fusco
- Medical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 80013 Naples, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Igino Simonetti
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Federica De Muzio
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences “V. Tiberio”, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
| | - Carmen Cutolo
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Salerno, Italy
| | - Pierpaolo Palumbo
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Area of Cardiovascular and Interventional Imaging, Abruzzo Health Unit 1, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandra Borgheresi
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Federica Flammia
- Department of Emergency Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Diletta Cozzi
- Department of Emergency Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Michela Gabelloni
- Department of Translational Research, Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Francesca Grassi
- Division of Radiology, “Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Vittorio Miele
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Department of Emergency Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Antonio Barile
- Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Andrea Giovagnoni
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche”, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Gandolfo
- Diagnostic Imaging Department, Villa Scassi Hospital-ASL 3, Corso Scassi 1, 16149 Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Deandrea S, Ferrè F, D’Antona R, Angiolini C, Bortul M, Bucchi L, Caumo F, Fortunato L, Giordano L, Giordano M, Mantellini P, Martelli I, Melucci G, Naldoni C, Paci E, Pau L, Saguatti G, Sestini E, Tinterri C, Vainieri M, Cataliotti L. Integrating mammography screening programmes into specialist breast centres in Italy: insights from a national survey of Senonetwork breast centres. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:723. [PMID: 35641985 PMCID: PMC9153866 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08111-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Despite recommendations, mammography screening is often insufficiently integrated into specialist breast centres. A national, cross-sectional, voluntary, online survey on this issue was carried out among the Italian breast centres associated with Senonetwork, the Italian network of breast cancer services.
Methods
A 73-item questionnaire was created, pre-tested and piloted. Centres integrating and not integrating a screening programme were compared using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model. Centres’ clustering was performed using the Gower’s distance metric. Groups and clusters were compared with the equality-of-means test.
Results
The response rate was 82/128 (65%). Overall, 84% (69/82) breast centres reported a collaboration with a screening programme in performing and/or reading mammograms and in the diagnostic work-up of women with abnormal screening results. The same proportion was observed among those centres responding to all questions (62/74). Performance expectancies (or the perceived usefulness of integration in terms of clinical quality, patient convenience, ease of job, and professional growth), satisfaction and motivation were higher in those centres collaborating with the screening programme. Effort expectancy indicators (or the degree to which the respondents believe that the integration is easy to implement) and those concerning the existence of facilitating conditions were lower both in centres collaborating and not collaborating with the screening programme. Among the former, six clusters of centres, distributed from ‘no integration’ to ‘high’, were identified. In cluster analysis, the highest level of integration was associated with higher agreement that integration eases the job, offers better opportunities for professional growth, and makes the working environment more satisfactory. The least integrated cluster assigned the lowest score to the statement that local health authority made available the resources needed.
Conclusions
While confirming the positive effects of integrating screening programmes into breast centres, this survey has brought to light specific difficulties that must be faced. The results provide insights into the importance of integration focusing on the perspectives of professional career and motivation. The deficiency of facilitating conditions to integration is modifiable. Screening professionals’ societies may have a role as initiators of the integration. Other supporting actions may be included in health laws at the national and regional level.
Collapse
|