Predictors for efficacy of combination therapy with a nucleos(t)ide analogue and interferon for chronic hepatitis B

Impact of hepatitis B surface antigen quantification on achieving a functional cure in patients with chronic hepatitis B: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Baseline hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels are associated with the likelihood of achieving HBsAg loss which defines the functional cure. However, optimal HBsAg cut-offs for predicting HBsAg loss have not been systematically investigated." Therefore, in this systematic review and meta-analysis, we evaluated the impact of baseline levels of HBsAg on achieving a functional cure in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to December 31, 2023, to identify studies comparing combination therapy with nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) and conventional/pegylated interferon (IFN) versus monotherapy. We pooled the proportion of HBsAg loss among studies stratified by different 75th percentile of baseline HBsAg levels and other clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

We included 24 studies with 3446 participants. At the end of treatment, studies recruiting patients with 75th percentile of baseline HBsAg below 500 and 1000 IU/mL had the highest proportions of HBsAg loss in the combination group, reaching 14 % (95 % CI: 9-21 %) and 17 % (95 % CI: 10-24 %), respectively. One-year IFN-NAs combination treatment achieved a higher proportion of HBsAg loss (9 %, 95 % CI: 6-12 %) than six-month IFN-NAs treatment (1 %, 95 % CI: 0-2 %). Patients with normal alanine transaminase (ALT) had higher HBsAg loss (11 %, 95 % CI: 6-17 %) than those with elevated ALT (4 %, 95 % CI: 2-7 %). Meta-regression indicated a positive association between male percentage in studies and HBsAg loss.

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal baseline HBsAg thresholds would be 500-1000 IU/mL, which represents high-response subpopulation for achieving functional cure with currently available therapy.

Entecavir for children and adults with chronic hepatitis B

RATIONALE

Chronic hepatitis B is a major worldwide public health concern. Entecavir, one nucleos(t)ide analogue antiviral therapy option, is recommended as the first-line drug for chronic hepatitis B in many clinical guidelines. However, none of the guideline recommendations are based on the findings of a systematic review with meta-analysis, where entecavir versus no treatment or placebo are compared directly.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of entecavir versus no treatment or placebo in children and adults with chronic hepatitis B, who are either hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg)-positive or HBeAg-negative.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, three other databases, online trial registries, and reference lists, and contacted authors. The latest search was on 19 July 2024.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included randomised clinical trials comparing entecavir versus no treatment or placebo in children or adults, or both, with chronic hepatitis B, and irrespective of treatment history with other antiviral drugs and other viral co-infections. We allowed co-interventions when administered equally to all intervention groups.

OUTCOMES

The outcomes reported in this abstract and in the summary of findings table are all-cause mortality, health-related quality of life, and proportion of people with serious adverse events at the longest follow-up.

RISK OF BIAS

We used the Cochrane RoB 2 tool to assess risk of bias in the included trials.

SYNTHESIS METHODS

We used a random-effects model to meta-analyse outcome results, where possible, and presented the results as a risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Where there was considerable heterogeneity, we performed a narrative analysis. We used a fixed-effect model for sensitivity analysis. We used GRADE to evaluate the certainty of evidence.

INCLUDED STUDIES

We included 22 randomised clinical trials (published from 2005 to 2022) with 2940 participants diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B. All trials had a parallel-group design. The experimental intervention was oral entecavir, with a follow-up duration of 5 weeks to 228 weeks. The comparator in 12 trials was no treatment, and in 10 trials was placebo. Fourteen trials equally administered co-interventions to the trial participants in the entecavir and no treatment and placebo groups. One trial included participants between 14 years and 55 years of age, one trial included only children, 19 trials included only adults, and one trial did not provide the age of participants.

SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS

Twenty trials contributed data to the quantitative analysis. Ten trials (1379 participants) reported all-cause mortality with a mean follow-up duration of 48.9 weeks (range 5 to 100 weeks). The result was not estimable because no deaths occurred in any of the entecavir and no treatment or placebo groups. None of the trials provided data on health-related quality of life. We are very uncertain about the effect of entecavir versus no treatment or placebo on the proportion of people with serious adverse events (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.32; absolute risk difference 22 fewer per 1000 (from 44 fewer to 21 more); 15 trials, 1676 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The mean follow-up duration was 58.4 weeks (range 5 weeks to 228 weeks). We downgraded the certainty of evidence for these outcomes to very low, mainly because the overall risk of bias in most trials was with some concerns or high, and serious imprecision (no events or few events).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Given the issues of risk of bias and insufficient power of the included trials and the very low certainty of the available evidence, we could not determine the effect of entecavir versus no treatment or placebo on critical outcomes such as all-cause mortality and serious adverse events. There is a lack of data on health-related quality of life. Given the first-line recommendation and wide usage of entecavir in people with chronic hepatitis B, further evidence on clinically important outcomes, analysed in this review, is needed.

FUNDING

This Cochrane review had no dedicated funding.

REGISTRATION

Registration: Entecavir for children and adults with chronic hepatitis B, CD015536 via DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD015536.

Effects of Tenofovir Combined with Recombinant Human Interferon α-2b on Negative Conversion Rate, Liver Function, Immune Status, and Drug Safety in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

To systematically evaluate the clinical value of tenofovir combined with recombinant human interferon α-2b in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B and to provide evidence-based medicine for its popularization and use.

Methods

The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of tenofovir combined with recombinant human interferon α-2b in the online database of PubMed, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, China knowledge Network (CNKI), China VIP database, Wanfang database, and China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) were searched. The data included in this study were extracted by two independent researchers. After extracting the data of the study, the Cochrane manual 5.1.0 standard was used to evaluate the bias risk of all the literature included in this study. RevMan5.4 statistical software was used to analyze the collected data by meta.

Results

Entecavir combined with recombinant human interferon α-2b can inhibit the activity of HBV polymerase and improve the inflammatory response of the liver. Recombinant human interferon α-2b can regulate immune function by inducing T cell differentiation and maturation and enhancing the production of cytokines. The systematic evaluation showed that entecavir combined with recombinant human interferon α-2b had higher serum HBeAg negative conversion rate, higher drug safety compared with entecavir alone, and improved liver function and immune status.

Conclusion

Tenofovir combined with recombinant human interferon alpha-2b has a high serum HBeAg negative rate and safety profile for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. The combination treatment can improve liver function and immune status in patients, but more studies with higher methodological quality and longer duration of intervention are needed for further validation.

A randomized controlled trial of pegylated interferon-alpha with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B: A 48-week follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Recent studies report incongruent finds regarding the addition of pegylated interferon -alpha (Peg- IFNα) to nucleos(t)ide analogues. This study was designed to compare the efficacy of Peg- IFNα and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) combination therapy with each of the treatments separately.

METHODS

In this open-label, randomized clinical trial, treatment-naive hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative patients were randomly assigned to three treatment groups: Group A: Peg- IFNα (180 mcg/week) with TDF (300 mg/day); Group B: TDF (300 mg/day); and Group C: Peg- IFNα (180 mcg/week). The intervention spanned 48 weeks and patients were followed up every 12 weeks. The primary end-point was HBV DNA load <20 IU/mL.

RESULTS

Groups A, B and C each comprised of 22, 23 and 22 patients, respectively. The number of patients with HBV DNA suppression in group A was significantly higher compared to groups B and C (P = 0.034). No significant difference was observed in the normalization trends of serum ALT levels between the three groups (P = 0.082). At week 48, combination therapy was significantly more effective in suppressing HBV DNA concentration to below the level of detection than TDF monotherapy (OR = 2.1, 95%CI: 1.18-4.15; P = 0.034). Furthermore, a comparison between monotherapy arms revealed that both interventions had similar effects on the overall outcome (OR = 1.24, 95%CI: 1.02-5.8; P = 0.062).

CONCLUSION

A Peg- IFNα and TDF combination therapy resulted in improved virologic response and was safe in HBeAg negative patients. Monotherapy with Peg-IFNα or TDF procured limited benefits in comparison.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20181113041635N1).

The efficacy of addition of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate to Peg-IFNα-2b is superior to the addition of Entecavir in HBeAg positive CHB patients with a poor response after 12 weeks of Peg-IFNα-2b treatment alone

Background: There are limited data regarding the efficacy of addition of entecavir (ETV) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) to Peg-IFNα-2b in HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients without early response to Peg-IFNα-2b. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ETV and TDF in HBeAg positive CHB patients who had a poor response to Peg-INFα-2b at the end of 12 weeks of monotherapy. Methods: A total of 40 HBeAg-positive CHB patients who were naive to antiviral therapy were recruited. The patients received a subcutaneous injection of Peg-IFNα-2b (180 µg) once a week for 12 weeks. However, the patients had a poor response to Peg-INFα-2b at the end of the 12-week-period monotherapy. The patients were then divided into two therapeutic protocol groups: (1) Group A: Patients received Peg-IFNα-2b (180 µg) subcutaneously weekly and ETV (0.5 mg) orally once daily for 48 weeks; (2) Group B: Patients received Peg-IFNα-2b (180 µg) subcutaneously weekly and TDF (300 mg) orally once daily for 48 weeks. The therapeutic efficacy was evaluated. Blood samples were collected at baseline and every 12 weeks. Routine biochemical tests including ALT, AST, etc. were measured by automated biochemical technique. HBV DNA was quantified using the TaqMan PCR assay. The levels of HBsAg, HBsAb, HBeAg, HBeAb and HBcAb were measured using a commercial chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay. Results: The HBsAg level declined rapidly in both two treatment groups during the first 12 weeks and declined gradually in the next 36 weeks. At week 48, the mean ΔHBsAg level in Peg-IFNα-2b+TDF group was significantly higher than that in Peg-IFNα-2b +ETV group (-1.799 ± 0.3063 vs. -1.078 ± 0.2028, P=0.0491). The HBeAg loss rate was significantly higher in TDF add-on group than that in ETV add-on group at week 48 (40% vs. 10%, P=0.028). At week 48, the proportions of patients with undetectable HBV DNA (<500 IU/mL) were 80% (16 out of 20) and 95% (19 out of 20) in Peg-IFNα-2b+ETV group and Peg-IFNα-2b+TDF group, respectively. Conclusions: This real world study demonstrated that the efficacy of addition of TDF to Peg-IFNα-2b is superior to the efficacy of addition of ETV to Peg-IFNα-2b in HBeAg positive CHB patients with a poor response after 12 weeks of Peg-IFNα-2b treatment alone. However, this present study also requires a larger sample size study to verify in the future.

Effects of IFN monotherapy versus combined therapy on HBeAg seroconversion or seroclearance in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Recent available treatment guidelines are pointing up clearance or seroconversion of hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg) as a valuable endpoint in treating HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. To evaluate the effect of combination therapy [interferon (IFN) plus nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs)] versus IFN monotherapy on HBeAg seroconversion or seroclearance in HBeAg-positive CHB patients.

METHODS

All available controlled clinical studies, published from Jan 2000 to Sep 2018, with CHB receiving IFN and NA combination therapy or IFN monotherapy were included. Risk ratio (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was estimated with a fixed-effects model when I² <50% for the test for heterogeneity. Publication bias was measured using Egger's test.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were included. Our meta-analysis demonstrated that IFN and NA combination therapy had a superior HBeAg seroconversion rate or clearance rate compared with IFN monotherapy at the end of treatment (EOT). Sub-analysis showed IFN plus adefovir dipivoxi (ADV) therapy had a better HBeAg seroconversion or seroclearance rate at EOT or at the end of follow-up (EOF).

CONCLUSION

Compared with IFN monotherapy, the combined therapy had a higher e-antigen serological response at EOT, but failed to improve the sustained response at EOF. Only combination therapy with IFN and ADV is superior to IFN monotherapy at the EOT or EOF for HBeAg seroconversion or seroclearance in HBeAg-positive CHB patients. The effect of other combination therapies is not superior to IFN monotherapy.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: combination treatment of regimens based on pegylated interferon for chronic hepatitis B focusing on hepatitis B surface antigen clearance

BACKGROUND

The seroclearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is considered to be associated with favourable clinical outcomes.

AIMS

This meta-analysis was performed to establish the proportion of HBsAg loss rates among CHB patients who received combination treatment based on pegylated interferon (PegIFN). Four combination strategies have been studied with the aim of improving HBsAg loss: "de novo," "NA-experienced," "switch-to" and "add-on." This meta-analysis was performed to determine which, if any, of these combination strategies was more effective.

METHODS

Medline, Web of Science and Embase databases were searched from inception to December 2017. The proportion of patients who achieved HBsAg loss after combination therapy was pooled using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies fulfilled the meta-analysis criteria. The overall pooled proportion suggested that the rate of HBsAg loss could be increased to 9% (95% CI: 7%-12%) based on the combination treatment in CHB patients. Compared with "de novo" strategy (8%, 95% CI: 6%-10%), the "nucleos(t)ide analogues-experienced" (11%, 95% CI: 8%-15%) was found to be more likely (P = 0.036) to achieve a response. Compared with the "add-on" strategy (8%, 95% CI: 5%-13%), the "switch-to" (14%, 95% CI: 9%-20%) was found to be more likely (P = 0.012) to achieve HBsAg loss.

CONCLUSION

The "nucleos(t)ide analogues-experienced" strategy was more effective than the "De novo" strategy in achieving HBsAg loss for CHB patients. Combination treatment using regimens based on Peg-IFN may be useful to help nucleos(t)ide analogues-treated patients, who have experienced at least 48 weeks of nucleot(s)ide analogue, achieve HBsAg seroclearance.