Multicentre study of 18F-FDG-PET/CT prostate incidental uptake

Definitions of Incidental [18F]FDG PET/CT Findings in the Literature: A Systematic Review and Definition Proposal

Objectives: The objectives of this study were (1) to systematically review the currently used definitions of incidental 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography findings (IPFs) in the literature and (2) to propose an IPF definition. Methods: A systematic search was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. The search was guided by the question "How is IPF defined?" and was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The retrieved studies were reviewed and analyzed. The definitions of IPFs in the included studies were compiled into two sets of categories based on the description of FDG uptake and the specification of clinical factors in defining IPFs. Results: The systematic literature search identified 4852 publications accessible for title-abstract screening, which yielded 395 studies for full-text assessment. Sixty-five studies met the eligibility criteria and were included. Sixty-two percent mentioned "FDG uptake" in their definition. In 40% of the definitions, "Focal FDG uptake" was specified, while "FDG uptake in the surrounding tissue" was included in 15%. Fifty-seven percent stated that IPFs were "Unrelated to PET/CT indication". Thirty-four percent specified IPFs as "Present in other organ than PET/CT indication", whereas 20% included "No known disease related to IPF". Seventeen percent of the definitions comprised a "New finding", while 15% and 11% encompassed a "Clinical asymptomatic patient" and "Not a metastasis", respectively. Finally, 5% of the definitions included "Potential clinical significance". Conclusions: No generally accepted definition of IPFs currently exists. We propose an IPF definition based on explicit FDG uptake and clinical patient-related factors.

Unexpected focal fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in main organs; pass through or pass by?

Since the inception of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18 FDG), positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) utilizing F-18 FDG has become widely accepted as a valuable imaging modality in the field of oncology, with global prevalence in clinical practice. Given that a single Torso PET/CT scan encompasses the anatomical region from the skull base to the upper thigh, the detection of incidental abnormal focal hypermetabolism in areas of limited clinical interest is both feasible and not uncommon. Numerous investigations have been undertaken to delineate the distinctive features of these findings, yet the outcomes have proven inconclusive. The incongruent results of these studies present a challenge for physicians, leaving them uncertain about the appropriate course of action. This article provides a succinct overview of the characteristics of fluorodeoxyglucose, followed by a comprehensive discussion of the imaging findings and clinical significance associated with incidental focal abnormal F-18 FDG activity in several representative organs. In conclusion, while the prevalence of unrecognized malignancy varies across organs, malignancies account for a substantial proportion, ranging from approximately one-third to over half, of incidental focal uptake. In light of these rates, physicians are urged to exercise vigilance in not disregarding unexpected uptake, facilitating more assured clinical decisions, and advocating for further active evaluation.

Role of FDG PET/CT in Management of Patients with Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men worldwide. [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging, a well-known and effective technique for detecting malignancies, has not been considered a useful tool for prostate cancer imaging by many because of its perceived low [18F]FDG uptake. Incidentally detected focal [18F]FDG uptake in the prostate is not uncommon, and typically benign. Imaging features that would increase concern for an underlying prostatic carcinoma, include focal uptake in the periphery near the gland margin without calcifications. [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging provides little value in the initial staging of prostate cancer, particularly in the era of prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radiotracer. In cases of biochemical recurrence, the value of [18F]FDG PET/CT increases notably when Grade group 4 or 5 and elevated PSA levels are present. Active research is underway for theranostic approaches to prostate cancer, including [177Lu]Lu-PSMA therapy. Dual tracer staging using FDG and PSMA imaging significantly enhances the accuracy of disease site assessment. Specifically, the addition of [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging allows for the evaluation of discordant disease (PSMA negative/FDG positive). The maximal benefit from [177Lu]Lu-PSMA therapy relies on significant PSMA accumulation across all disease sites, and the identification of discordant disease suggests that these patients may derive less benefit from the treatment. The genuine value of [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging lies in advanced prostate cancer, PSMA-negative disease, as a prognostic biomarker, and the realm of new targeted theranostic agents.

The risk of prostate cancer on incidental finding of an avid prostate uptake on 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for non-prostate cancer-related pathology: A single centre retrospective study

Objective

To review the risk of prostate cancer (PCa) in men with incidentally reported increased intraprostatic uptake at 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) ordered at Department of Urology, The Wesley Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia for non-PCa related pathology.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of consecutive men between August 2014 and August 2019 presenting to a single institution for 18F-FDG PET/CT for non-prostate related conditions was conducted. Men were classified as benign, indeterminate, or malignant depending of the results of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA velocity, biopsy histopathology, and three-Tesla (3 T) multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score, or gallium-68-prostate-specific membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA) PET/CT results.

Results

Three percent (273/9122) of men demonstrated 18F-FDG avidity within the prostate. Eighty-five percent (231/273) were further investigated, including with PSA tests (227/231, 98.3%), 3 T mpMRI (68/231, 29.4%), 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT (33/231, 14.3%), and prostate biopsy (57/231, 24.7%). Results were considered benign in 130/231 (56.3%), indeterminate in 31/231 (13.4%), and malignant in 70/231 (30.3%). PCa was identified in 51/57 (89.5%) of the men who proceeded to biopsy, including 26/27 (96.3%) men with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System scores 4-5 mpMRI and six men with a positive 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. The most common Gleason score on biopsy was greater than or equal to 4+5 (14/51, 27.5%). 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT was concordant with the 18F-FDG findings in 26/33 (78.8%). All 13 men with a positive concordant 18F-FDG, 3 T mpMRI, and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT had PCa on biopsy. There was no statistically significant difference in the 18F-FDG maximum standardized uptake value between the benign or malignant groups (5.7 vs. 6.1; p=0.580).

Conclusion

In this study, after an incidental finding of an avid intraprostatic lesion on 18F-FDG PET/CT, 70 of the 231 cases (30.3%; 0.8% of the entire cohort) had results consistent with PCa, most commonly as Gleason score greater than or equal to 4+5 disease. Unless there is limited life expectancy due to competing medical co-morbidity, men with an incidental finding of intraprostatic uptake on 18F-FDG should be further investigated using principles of PCa detection.

Cancer of unknown primary eventually diagnosed as poorly differentiated prostate cancer: a case report

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer has been well known to have a high prevalence among middle-aged and older men, with high incidence of metastases to the bone-the main metastatic site. However, prostate cancer among those less than 50 years of age is extremely rare, and neck swelling is seldom the initial symptom.

CASE PRESENTATION

We herein report case of a 47-year-old Japanese male with poorly differentiated prostate cancer that had been initially diagnosed as a cancer of unknown primary with multiple lymph node and bone metastases before reaching a definitive diagnosis. The patient has been started on endocrine therapy and is currently alive without progression.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

When locating the primary lesion in men with cancer of unknown primary, it is important to consider the possibility of prostate cancer, confirm serum prostate-specific antigen levels, and perform local prostate evaluation.

Significance of incidental focal fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in colon/rectum, thyroid, and prostate: With a brief literature review

BACKGROUND

Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (F-18 FDG PET/CT), a functional imaging method, is usually performed on the entire torso, and regions of unexpected suspicious focal hypermetabolism are not infrequently observed. Among the regions, colon, thyroid, and prostate were found to be the common organs in a recent umbrella review. Some studies reported that a high rate of malignancy was shown in incidentally identified focal hypermetabolic regions and suggested that further examinations should not be ignored.

AIM

To investigate the malignancy rate of incidental focal FDG uptake, useful PET parameters and their cutoffs in discrimination between malignant and benign lesions.

METHODS

Retrospectively, the final reports of 16510 F-18 FDG PET/CT scans performed at our hospital between January 2016 and March 2022 were reviewed to identify incidentally observed FDG uptake in the colon/rectum, thyroid, and prostate. The scans of patients with current or prior malignancies at each corresponding location, without the final reports of histopathology or colonoscopy (for colon and rectum) for the corresponding hypermetabolic regions, or with diffuse (not focal) hypermetabolism were excluded. Finally, 88 regions of focal colorectal hypermetabolism in 85 patients (48 men and 37 women with mean age 67.0 ± 13.4 years and 63.4 ± 15.8 years, respectively), 48 focal thyroid uptakes in 48 patients (12 men and 36 women with mean age 62.2 ± 13.1 years and 60.8 ± 12.4 years, respectively), and 39 focal prostate uptakes in 39 patients (mean age 71.8 ± 7.5 years) were eligible for this study. For those unexpected focal hypermetabolic regions, rates of malignancy were calculated, PET parameters, such as standardized uptake value (SUV), capable of distinguishing between malignant and benign lesions were investigated, and the cutoffs of those PET parameters were determined by plotting receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

In the colon and rectum, 29.5% (26/88) were malignant and 33.0% (29/88) were premalignant lesions. Both SUVmax and SUVpeak differentiated malignant/premalignant from benign lesions, however, no parameters could distinguish malignant from premalignant lesions. Higher area under the curve was shown with SUVmax (0.752, 95%CI: 0.649-0.856, P < 0.001) and the cutoff was 7.6. In the thyroid, 60.4% (29/48) were malignant. The majority were well-differentiated thyroid cancers (89.7%, 26/29). The results of BRAF mutation tests were available for 20 of the 26 well-differentiated thyroid cancers and all 20 had the mutation. Solely SUVmax differentiated malignant from benign lesions and the cutoff was 6.9. In the prostate, 56.4% (22/39) were malignant. Only SUVmax differentiated malignant from benign lesions and the cutoff was 3.8. Overall, among the 175 focal hypermetabolic regions, 60.6% (106/175) were proven to be malignant and premalignant (in colon and rectum) lesions.

CONCLUSION

Approximately 60% of the incidentally observed focal F-18 FDG uptake in the colon/rectum, thyroid, and prostate were found to be malignant. Of the several PET parameters, SUVmax was superior to others in distinguishing between malignant/premalignant and benign lesions. Based on these findings, incidental focal hypermetabolism should not be ignored and lead physicians to conduct further investigations with greater confidence.

Prostate incidentaloma on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography: Diagnostic value of volumetric positron emission tomography parameters

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether volumetric PET parameters such as metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) contributed to maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in predicting prostate carcinoma in the prostate incidentalomas (PI) in 18F-FDG PET/CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study comprised 107 patients with PI of 4723 male patients who had undergone 18F-FDG PET/CT. SUVmax and volumetric PET parameters of PIs were assessed. MTV and TLG were acquired with each SUV threshold as 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, and 5.0.

RESULTS

The PI incidence was 2.3%, and the malignancy ratio of PI was 15.9%. According to further analysis results, 17 patients were in the malignant group, and 46 patients were in the benign group. Malignant PIs had higher SUVmax (10.6 vs. 6.4 and p<0.01), MTV (all p < 0.01) and TLG (all p < 0.01) than benign incidentalomas. All volumetric PET parameters had higher area under the curve (AUC) than SUVmax. SUVmax AUC was 0.835 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.728-0.942]. MTV 2.5 and TLG 2.5 had the highest performance for predicting malignant PI.MTV2.5 AUC was 0.871 (95% CI: 0.775-0.968), and TLG2.5 AUC was 0.882 (95% CI: 0.797-0.967). Using TLG 2.5 greater than 29.8 as the cut-off point, the sensitivity and specificity for malignancy prediction were 94.1% and 82.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In this study, in which the effectiveness of volumetric parameters in the diagnosis of PI was evaluated for the first time, it was shown that they could potentially have clinical value along with SUVmax.

Incidentalomas of the prostate detected by 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography

INTRODUCTION

Prostate incidentalomas are prostatic lesions suspicious for cancer discovered by imaging patients without a known history of prostatic cancer (PCa) for other reasons. 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET) is used to diagnose, stage, and assess response to treatment for numerous cancers, but it is not routinely used for PCa. We aimed to determine the rate of detection of prostate incidentalomas in patients undergoing FDG PET and to evaluate the natural history of these lesions.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of all FDG PET scans performed between 2005 and 2017 at a single institution. Patients were selected who had prostatic uptake without a history of PCa. Clinical data were collected from electronic medical records to determine how the prostate incidentalomas were further evaluated and to define the rate of malignancy.

RESULTS

A prostate incidentaloma was identified in 309 (1.0%) of 31 019 FDG PET scans performed on men. A prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test was obtained in 40.1% of patients within six months of prostate incidentaloma detection. Six patients underwent a multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate, which identified PCa in one case. Overall, PCa was diagnosed in 33 cases, representing 10.7% of the prostate incidentalomas and 0.1% of the scanned patients. PCa was intermediate- or high-risk in 27 (8.7%) of the prostate incidentalomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Incidental lesions detected in the prostate by FDG PET may represent clinically significant PCa. Referral to a urologist for further evaluation should be considered if the patient is otherwise in reasonable health.

Evidence-based management of incidental focal uptake of fluorodeoxyglucose on PET-CT

Focal incidental uptake, with or without CT abnormalities, is a common finding on fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and evidence-based management for this type of uptake is lacking. This article reviews the evidence on focal incidental uptake including the incidence of malignancy, differential diagnosis and imaging criteria which can be used to further characterize it. The article focusses on PET rather than CT criteria. The strength of the evidence base is highly variable ranging from systematic reviews and meta-analyses to a virtual absence of evidence. Caution needs to be used when using standardized uptake values (SUVs) reported in other studies due to interpatient and institution observed variation in SUVs. There is sufficient evidence to permit specific suggestions on how to interpret the foci and recommend further management in the: pituitary (investigate when SUVmax >4.1), thyroid (investigate all), breast (investigate all), lung parenchyma (if focus of fluorodeoxyglucose without a CT nodule, no further investigations), colon (investigate all foci with SUVmax >5.9, urgently if SUVmax >11.4), adrenals (criteria depend on if patient has cancer) and prostate gland (investigate in males aged >50 years or >40 years if peripheral uptake or patient has other risk factors). There is some evidence to guide further management for the parotid gland, naso-orophaynx, oesophagus, pancreas, uterus and ovaries. There is insufficient evidence to guide management for the liver, spleen, kidneys, gallbladder, testis and bone, for these organs patient characteristics and other guidelines will likely be of more use in determining further management.

18F-FDG PET/CT in primary brain lymphoma

The actual role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in evaluating primary brain lymphoma is still an open issue. Brain lymphoma usually show elevated 18F-FDG uptake, often higher than other brain tumors or inflammatory processes, but the metabolic behavior of this lymphoma is not still understood. Our aim was to investigate the particular metabolic behavior of this lymphoma. Forty six patients (21 female, 25 male) with histologically-confirmed brain lymphoma who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT from vertex to the mid-thigh for initial staging were retrospectively evaluated. The PET images were analyzed visually and semi-quantitatively by measuring the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), lesion-to-liver SUVmax ratio, lesion-to-blood pool SUVmax ratio and the tumor to normal brain uptake ratio (T/N ratio) and compared with epidemiological (age, sex, HIV infection) and morphological (tumor size, MRI appearance) characteristics. Thirty-eight patients (83%) had positive 18F-FDG PET/CT (average SUVmax was 15.6 ± 9.2; lesion-to-liver SUVmax ratio 5.8 ± 2.8; lesion-to-blood pool SUVmax ratio 7.1 ± 3.8, T/N ratio 3.1 ± 1.7) at the corresponding brain lesion; the remaining 8 (17%) were not 18F-FDG avid. 18F-FDG avidity was significantly associated with morphological appearance and tumor size and not correlated with other features. 18F-FDG PET/CT detected extracranial disease in two cases (4%) with negative bone marrow biopsies and CT. In conclusion, brain lymphomas are 18F-FDG avid in 83% of cases showing high 18F-FDG uptake and 18F-FDG avidity is correlated with tumor size and morphological appearance of the lesion. PET/CT helped to recognize extracranial disease in two patients.

Case: Incidental 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography prostate uptake: How should these patients be managed?

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/ computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) is a widely used diagnostic tool for whole-body imaging, and incidental prostatic uptake occurs in approximately 1% of patients undergoing the exam. Is 18F-FDG PET/CT a reliable screening tool for prostate cancer? Should these patients undergo transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsies? Studies have indicated that 18F-FDG PET/CT has a low positive predictive value for prostate cancer and is not recommended for screening;1 however, other studies suggest that when a discrete focal 18F-FDG uptake is discovered without coincidental calcification, particularly in the peripheral zone of the prostate, further clinical evaluation is recommended. We present two patients with incidental 18F-FDG PET/CT prostatic uptake who were found to have high-grade prostate cancer. Although 18F-FDG PET/CT has not been determined to be a reliable screening tool for prostate cancer, patients with incidental 18F-FDG uptake in the prostate should be referred for urological evaluation.

Update on advances in molecular PET in urological oncology

Integrated positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with 2-[(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG) has emerged as a powerful tool for the combined metabolic and anatomic evaluation of many cancers. In urological oncology, however, the use of (18)F-FDG has been limited by a generally low tumor uptake, and physiological excretion of FDG through the urinary system. (18)F-FDG PET/CT is useful when applied to specific indications in selected patients with urological malignancy. New radiotracers and positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) are expected to further improve the performance of PET in uro-oncology.