Laparoscopic Heller myotomy as the gold standard for treatment of achalasia

The SAGES MASTERS Program: top 10 seminal articles for Heller myotomy and treatment of achalasia

BACKGROUND

The Foregut Surgery Pathway of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Masters Program focuses on four anchoring procedures, which include laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair, laparoscopic Heller myotomy, and revisional foregut surgery. In this manuscript, we present and discuss the top 10 seminal articles related to a Heller myotomy and treatment of achalasia. Heller myotomy represents "mastery" level for foregut operations.

METHODS

The literature was systematically searched to identify the most cited and pertinent articles on achalasia and Heller Myotomy. Members of the SAGES Foregut committee reviewed these articles and using a Delphi method elected the seminal articles deemed most pertinent to a Heller Myotomy. These articles were reviewed in detail by committee members and are presented here.

RESULTS

These top 10 seminal articles on Heller myotomy focus on diagnosis, therapeutic options, outcomes, adverse effects, and their management. A summary of each paper is presented, including expert appraisal and commentary.

CONCLUSIONS

The top 10 articles presented here emphasize Heller myotomy as a core foregut operation. These articles highlight this operation an effective therapeutic option for achalasia that provides relief of dysphagia with decreased risk of post-operative gastroesophageal reflux.

Postmyotomy Esophageal Diverticulum-A Unique Entity Mimicking Achalasia Recurrence

Background: Recurrence of dysphagia following myotomy for achalasia poses clinical and diagnostic challenges. Postmyotomy esophageal diverticula is a rare disorder, usually developing due to inadequate myotomy, resulting in dysphagia. We herein present a new entity of esophageal diverticula developing after successful complete myotomy, which causes dysphagia and mimics recurrence of achalasia. Methods: A review of the prospectively maintained database of all patients with achalasia and diverticula between January 2012 and June 2024 was performed. Demographic, clinical data, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes were collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 9 patients underwent esophageal diverticulectomy in our institution. Five patients had achalasia and myotomy either by per-oral endoscopic myotomy, laparoscopic Heller myotomy, or pneumatic dilation. All patients suffered from a recurrence of symptoms, with an open lower esophageal sphincter confirmed by manometry or EndoFLIP™. The time from myotomy to diagnosis was 31-117 months. Four were males and 1 was female between the ages of 33 and 58 years, with an average body mass index of 22.4 kg/m2. All patients underwent esophageal diverticulectomy with no additional myotomy. Median preoperative and postoperative Eckardt scores were 5 and 0 respectively, with complete resolution of symptoms. Conclusions: Epiphrenic diverticula is a rare cause of postmyotomy dysphagia in achalasia patients. Previously, this entity was described in the context of insufficient myotomy; however, we present here a case series of patients with epiphrenic diverticula following adequate myotomy with no distal obstruction. Following diverticulectomy, their dysphagia was resolved. We suggest an algorithm for the diagnosis and treatment of dysphagia following myotomy for achalasia.

Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic Heller's myotomy with angle of His accentuation in patients of achalasia cardia

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic Heller's myotomy (LHM) is an established treatment for achalasia cardia. Anti-reflux procedures (ARP) are recommended with LHM to reduce the post-operative reflux though the optimal anti-reflux procedure is still debatable. This study reports on the long-term outcomes of LHM with Angle-of-His accentuation (AOH) in patients of achalasia cardia.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-six patients of achalasia cardia undergoing LHM with AOH between January 2010 to October 2021 with a minimum follow-up of one year were evaluated for symptomatic outcomes using Eckardt score (ES), DeMeester heartburn (DMH) score and achalasia disease specific quality of life (A-DsQoL) questionnaire. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, high resolution manometry (HRM) and timed barium esophagogram (TBE) were performed when feasible and rates of esophagitis and improvement in HRM and TBE parameters evaluated. Time dependent rates of success were calculated with respect to improvement in ES and dysphagia-, regurgitation- and heartburn-free survival using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 65.5 months, the overall success (ES ≤ 3) was 94.1%. There was statistically significant improvement in ES, heartburn score and A-DsQoL score (p < 0.00001, p = 0.002 and p < 0.00001). Significant heartburn (score ≥ 2) was seen in 12.5% subjects with 9.5% patients reporting frequent PPI use (> 3 days per week). LA-B and above esophagitis was seen in 12.7%. HRM and TBE parameters also showed a significant improvement as compared to pre-operative values (IRP: p < 0.0001, column height: p < 0.0001, column width: p = 0.0002). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed dysphagia, regurgitation, and heartburn free survival of 75%, 96.2% and 72.3% respectively at 10 years.

CONCLUSIONS

LHM with AOH gives a lasting relief of symptoms in patients of achalasia cardia with heartburn rates similar to that reported in studies using Dor's or Toupet's fundoplication with LHM. Hence, LHM with AOH may be a preferred choice in patients of achalasia cardia given the simplicity of the procedure.

Clinical and financial outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy compared to laparoscopic heller myotomy for treatment of achalasia

BACKGROUND

Previous studies analyzing short-term outcomes for per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) have shown excellent clinical response rates and shorter operative times compared to laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM). Despite this, many payors have been slow to recognize POEM as a valid treatment option. Furthermore, comparative studies analyzing long-term outcomes are limited. This study compares perioperative and long-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and reimbursement for POEM and LHM at a single institution.

METHODS

Adult patients who underwent POEM or LHM between 2014 and 2021 and had complete preoperative data with at least one complete follow up, were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic data, success rate, operative time, myotomy length, length of stay, pre- and postoperative symptom scores, anti-reflux medication use, cost and reimbursement were compared.

RESULTS

58 patients met inclusion with 25 undergoing LHM and 33 undergoing POEM. There were no significant differences in preoperative characteristics. Treatment success (Eckardt ≤ 3) for POEM and LHM was achieved by 88% and 76% of patients, respectively (p = 0.302). POEM patients had a shorter median operative time (106 min. vs. 145 min., p = 0.003) and longer median myotomy length (11 cm vs. 8 cm, p < 0.001). All LHM patients had a length of stay (LOS) ≥ 1 day vs. 51.5% for POEM patients (p < 0.001). Both groups showed improvements in dysphagia, heartburn, regurgitation, Eckardt score, GERD HRQL, RSI, and anti-reflux medication use. The improvement in dysphagia score was greater in patients undergoing POEM (2.30 vs 1.12, p = 0.003). Median hospital reimbursement was dramatically less for POEM ($3,658 vs. $14,152, p = 0.002), despite median hospital costs being significantly lower compared to LHM ($2,420 vs. $3,132, p = 0.029).

RESULTS

POEM is associated with a shorter operative time and LOS, longer myotomy length, and greater resolution of dysphagia compared to LHM. POEM costs are significantly less than LHM but is poorly reimbursed.

The incidence of reintervention and reoperation following Heller myotomy across multiple indications

INTRODUCTION

Achalasia is a debilitating primary esophageal motility disorder. Heller myotomy (HM) is a first-line therapy for the treatment of achalasia patients who have failed other modalities. Other indications for HM include diverticulum, diffuse esophageal spasm, and esophageal strictures. However, long-term outcomes of HM are unclear. This study aims to assess incidence of reintervention, either endoscopically or through minimally invasive or resectional procedures, in patients who underwent HM in New York State.

METHODS

The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) administrative longitudinal database identified 1817 adult patients who underwent HM between 2000 and 2008 for achalasia, esophageal diverticulum, diffuse esophageal spasm, and esophageal strictures, based on ICD-9 and CPT codes. Through the use of unique identifiers, patients requiring reintervention were tracked up to 2016 (for at least 8 years follow-up). Primary outcome was incidence of subsequent procedures following HM. Secondary outcomes were time to reintervention and risk factors for reintervention.

RESULTS

Of the 1817 patients who underwent HM, 320 (17.6%) required subsequent intervention. Of the 320 patients, 234 (73.1%) underwent endoscopic reinterventions, 54 (16.9%) underwent minimally invasive procedures, and 32 (10%) underwent resectional procedures as their initial revisional intervention. Of the 234 patients who underwent endoscopic reintervention as their initial revisional procedure, only 40 (16.8%) required subsequent surgical procedures. Over a mean follow-up of 7.0 years, the mean time to a subsequent procedure was 4.3 ± 3.74 years. Reintervention rates after 10 years following HM for achalasia, diverticulum ,and other indication were 24.4%, 12.6%, and 37%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The majority of HM reinterventions were managed solely by endoscopic procedures (60.6%). Heller myotomy remains an excellent procedure to prevent surgical reintervention for achalasia and diverticulum.

Outcomes of Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy for Achalasia: 22-Year Experience

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy is the most effective treatment of achalasia. We examined the durability of symptomatic relief, with and without fundoplication.

METHODS

A single institution database between 1995 and 2017 was reviewed. Achalasia symptom severity was assessed by Eckardt scores (ES) obtained at 3-time points via patient questionnaire. Primary outcome was treatment success defined as ES of < 3.

RESULTS

Completed surveys were returned by 130 patients (median follow-up of 6.6 years). A partial fundoplication was performed in 86%. At both 1-year and late follow-up, patients reported a significant improvement in ES compared to baseline (p < 0.05). Of those followed for ≥ 10 years (n = 44), 82% reported ES < 3 at 1-year (p < 0.001), and 78% at last follow-up (p < .001). Of patients who reported treatment success 1-year postoperatively (103/130), 85% continued to report symptomatic relief at last follow-up. Five-year cohort analysis did not show deterioration of dysphagia relief over time. The presence or absence of fundoplication had no impact on long-term outcome (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

LHM provides immediate and durable symptomatic relief, with very few patients requiring further therapeutic intervention. Fundoplication does not appear to influence the durability of symptom relief. Treatment success at 1-year is predictive of long-lasting symptomatic relief.

Experience with Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Achalasia and Spastic Esophageal Motility Disorders at a Tertiary U.S. Center

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a novel procedure for the treatment of achalasia and spastic esophageal disorders. Experience with POEM is limited, but its reported outcomes are excellent. It is deemed safe even for patients with prior interventions.

METHODS

This retrospective review included patients who underwent POEM at a tertiary US center. POEM was performed in a multidisciplinary approach by advanced endoscopists and foregut surgeons. Clinical success was defined as a post-POEM Eckardt score ≤3.

RESULTS

A total of 125 patients were included. Median follow-up period was 18 months (interquartile range, 10-22 months). Clinical success was achieved in 92% of patients and persisted at 12 months in 88% of patients. Mucosal barrier failure (MBF) occurred in 7 patients, 2 of whom required surgical intervention. MBF was more common in patients with prior laparoscopic Heller myotomy (19% vs. 3%, p=0.015). MBF requiring surgical intervention occurred early in the learning curve.

CONCLUSION

POEM is safe and effective in the treatment of achalasia and spastic esophageal disorders even after failed prior interventions.

The effect of prior treatment on clinical outcomes in patients with achalasia undergoing peroral endoscopic myotomy

BACKGROUND

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a treatment option for patients with previous surgical or endoscopic treatment. We aimed to evaluate the influence of prior treatment on perioperative and follow-up outcomes in patients undergoing POEM.

METHODS

From August 2010 to December 2014, a total of 1384 patients with achalasia underwent POEM at our center. We retrospectively reviewed 849 patients who completed follow-up. Patients with an Eckardt score ≥ 4 after POEM were considered to have a clinical failure. We compared variables between patients with and without prior treatment. We analyzed risk factors for perioperative major adverse events, and clinical reflux and failure during follow-up.  RESULTS:  245 patients (28.9 %) had undergone prior treatment, and 34 patients (4.0 %) experienced a major adverse event associated with the POEM procedure. During a median follow-up of 23 months (range 1 - 71), clinical reflux occurred in 203 patients (23.9 %) and clinical failure was recorded for 94 patients (11.1 %). Patients with prior treatment had a longer procedure duration (P = 0.001) and longer hospital stay after POEM (P = 0.001). Prior treatment was not an independent risk factor for major adverse events or clinical reflux (odds ratio [OR] 1.19, P = 0.65; OR 1.26, P = 0.19; logistic regression), but it did increase the rate of clinical failure during follow-up (hazard ratio 1.90, P = 0.002; Cox regression).

CONCLUSIONS

POEM was performed safely with a low rate of major adverse events in patients with achalasia who had undergone prior surgical or endoscopic treatment. However, prior treatment increased the risk of clinical failure after POEM.

A Retrospective Study of Peroral Endoscopic Full-Thickness Myotomy in Patients with Severe Achalasia

OBJECTIVES

Selective circular myotomy (CM) is recommended in peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia, but completeness of myotmoy is the prerequisite for excellent long-term results of conventional surgical myotomy. The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy and safety between peroral endoscopic full-thickness and simple CM for the treatment of severe achalasia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 123 severe achalasia patients who underwent POEM from August 2011 to May 2013 were included. They were divided into circular or full-thickness myotomy (FTM) groups according to the depth of myotomy. Demographics, Eckardt score, procedure-related parameters, perioperative adverse events, pre- and postoperative esophageal diameter, esophageal manometry, and follow-up results were retrospectively collected and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

All the 123 patients underwent POEM successfully, and the mean operation time was significantly shorter in FTM group compared with CM group (57.4 ± 8.2 minutes versus 63.2 ± 12.3 minutes, P < .05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of treatment success, pre- and postoperative Eckardt score, esophageal diameter, esophageal manometry, and perioperative adverse events (P > .05). Twenty-four-hour pH monitoring was performed in 19 patients (11 in FTM, 8 in CM). Although no statistical difference was detected in rate of abnormal esophageal acid exposure between groups, this rate was higher in FTM group than CM group (60% versus 40%, P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Treatment efficacy in short-to-medium term are comparable between circular or FTM. FTM significantly reduce the operative duration, but it may increase potential risk of gastroesophageal reflux disease incidence.

Achalasia

Achalasia is a rare neurogenic motility disorder of the esophagus, occurring in approximately 0.11 cases per 100,000 children. The combination of problems (aperistalsis, hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter (LES), and lack of receptive LES relaxation) results in patients having symptoms of progressive dysphagia, weight loss, and regurgitation. Treatment modalities have evolved over the past few decades from balloon dilation and botulinum toxin injection to laparoscopic Heller myotomy and endoscopic myotomy. Most data on achalasia management is extrapolated to children from adult experience. This article describes understanding of the pathogenesis and discusses newer therapeutic techniques as well as controversies in management.

Achalasia: Outcome in children

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal achalasia is well-recognized but relatively rare in children, occasionally appearing as the "triple A" syndrome (with adrenal insufficiency and alacrima). Treatment modalities, as in adult practice, are not curative, often needing further interventions and spurring the search for better management. The outcome for syndromic variants is unknown. We sought to define the efficacy of treatments for children with achalasia with and without triple A syndrome.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of presentation and outcomes for 42 children with achalasia presenting over three decades to a major pediatric referral center. Long term impact of the diagnosis was assessed by questionnaire.

RESULTS

We identified 42 children including six with triple A syndrome. The median overall age at diagnosis was 10.8 years and median follow-up 1593 days. Initial Heller myotomy in 17 required further interventions in 11 (65%), while initial treatment with botulinum toxin (n = 20) was ultimately followed by myotomy in 17 (85%). Ten out of 35 patients who underwent myotomy required a repeat myotomy (29%). Patients with triple A syndrome developed symptoms earlier, but had delayed diagnosis, were more underweight at diagnosis and at last follow up. Questionnaire results suggested a significant long term deleterious impact on the quality of life of children and their families.

CONCLUSION

Many children with achalasia relapse after initial treatment, undergoing multiple, different procedures, despite which symptoms persist and impact on quality of life. Symptoms develop earlier in patients with triple A syndrome, but the diagnosis is delayed and this has substantial nutritional impact.

Multidisciplinary Approach to Esophageal Achalasia: A Single Center Experience

BACKGROUND

The treatment of achalasia is palliative. Pneumatic dilatation (PD) or laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) just eliminates the outflow obstruction allowing easier emptying of the esophagus. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of a multidisciplinary approach to esophageal achalasia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A consecutive series of patients with achalasia treated by a multidisciplinary esophageal team consisting of radiologists, gastroenterologists, and surgeons in a quaternary care center between May 2008 and April 2015 were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 147 patients with achalasia underwent LHM and partial fundoplication. Sixty-two patients (42%) had been treated preoperatively with PD and/or botulinum toxin (BT). The preoperative Eckardt score (ES) was 6.4 ± 2. At a median follow-up of 22 months, 128 patients (87%) did well and required no further treatment (ES 0.1). The remaining 19 patients (13%) had recurrence of symptoms and required further treatment: 12 were treated with PD and improved (ES 0.7); 4 were treated with PD and BT and improved (ES 1.3); 3 failed PD. These 3 patients had been treated with multiple sessions of PD and BT before the myotomy. Overall, 144 patients (98%) did well with laparoscopic (87%) or laparoscopic and endoscopic treatment (11%).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study show that (a) LHM is an effective treatment modality, (b) PD improved symptoms in the majority of patients with recurrent dysphagia after myotomy and (c) multiple preoperative endoscopic treatments seem to affect outcomes of LHM. Patients with achalasia should be treated in a quaternary care center by a multidisciplinary team.

Complications Following Surgery for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Achalasia

Surgical procedures to treat reflux disease are common, but good outcomes rely on both a thorough preoperative workup and careful surgical techniques. Although complications are uncommon, surgeons should recognize these and possess the skills to overcome them in clinical practice.

Day surgery for achalasia cardia: Time for consensus?

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic Heller's myotomy (LHM) is the most effective therapy for achalasia of the oesophagus. Most case series of LHM report a length of hospital stay (LOS) >1 day. We present 14 years of experience of LHM to examine the safety and feasibility of LHM as a day case procedure.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined patients undergoing elective LHM for achalasia at our institution between 2000 and 2014. Demographics, episode statistics, prior investigations and interventions were collated. Outcomes, including LOS, complications and re-interventions, were compared for the periods before and after a consensus decision at our institution in 2008 to perform LHM as a day case procedure.

RESULTS

Sixty patients with a mean age of 41 ± 13 years were included, of whom 58% were male. The median LOS for all patients was 1 day (interquartile range [IQR] 0-2.25). Overall, LHM was performed as a day case in 27 (45%) cases, at 2/26 (7.7%) in the first period versus 25/34 (73.5%) in the second (p<0.01). There were no significant differences in age, gender or previous interventions between day surgery and non-day surgery groups. One patient required subsequent unplanned surgery, while six (10%) needed endoscopic treatment of recurrent symptoms within 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

LHM can be performed safely as a day case procedure. Complication rates are low, with only a small proportion of patients requiring endoscopic treatment for symptom recurrence within 1 year.

Esophagectomy for end-stage achalasia

Achalasia is a disease for which treatments are palliative in nature. Success of therapy is judged by a number of metrics, the most important being relief of symptoms, such as dysphagia and regurgitation. Patients often compensate for symptoms though a variety of dietary and lifestyle modifications, making symptomatic assessment of therapeutic outcome unreliable. Given this fact, and the progressive nature of the condition if left inadequately treated, patients not infrequently present with the disabling manifestations of end-stage disease for which esophagectomy is the best option. In appropriately selected patients, and when performed in experienced centers, esophagectomy with foregut reconstruction can be undertaken successfully with acceptable rates of morbidity and mortality, as well as a good long-term symptomatic outcome, in cases of end-stage achalasia.