1
|
Wang C, Liu X, Wang W, Miao Z, Li X, Liu D, Hu K. Treatment Options for Distal Rectal Cancer in the Era of Organ Preservation. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2024; 25:434-452. [PMID: 38517596 PMCID: PMC10997725 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01194-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT The introduction of total mesorectal excision into the radical surgery of rectal cancer has significantly improved the oncological outcome with longer survival and lower local recurrence. Traditional treatment modalities of distal rectal cancer, relying on radical surgery, while effective, take their own set of risks, including surgical complications, potential damage to the anus, and surrounding structure owing to the pursuit of thorough resection. The progress of operating methods as well as the integration of systemic therapies and radiotherapy into the peri-operative period, particularly the exciting clinical complete response of patients after neoadjuvant treatment, have paved the way for organ preservation strategy. The non-inferiority oncological outcome of "watch and wait" compared with radical surgery underscores the potential of organ preservation not only to control local recurrence but also to reduce the need for treatments followed by structure destruction, hopefully improving the long-term quality of life. Radical radiotherapy provides another treatment option for patients unwilling or unable to undergo surgery. Organ preservation points out the direction of treatment for distal rectal cancer, while additional researches are needed to answer remaining questions about its optimal use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Xiaoliang Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Weiping Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Zheng Miao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Xiaoyan Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Dingchao Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Ke Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tan S, Ou Y, Huang S, Gao Q. Surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes of local and radical resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for early- and mid-stage rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 38:132. [PMID: 37193915 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04433-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical resection is typically the standard treatment for early- and mid-stage rectal cancer as local resection may result in a high rate of recurrence and risk of distant metastasis. A growing number of studies have shown that local excision after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy can significantly reduce recurrence rates and is a feasible strategy to preserve the rectum as an alternative to conventional radical resection. OBJECTIVE This study aims to compare the efficacy of local resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy with radical surgery for early- and mid-stage rectal cancer and to report the evidence-based clinical advantages of both techniques. METHODS Clinical trials comparing oncologic and perioperative outcomes of local and radical resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in patients with early- to mid-stage rectal cancer were searched in PubMed, Embase, Web Of Science, and Cochrane databases, and a total of 5 randomized controlled trials and 11 cohort study trials were included. RESULTS In terms of oncology and perioperative outcomes, there were no statistically significant differences between the radical resection group and the local resection group in terms of OS [HR = 0.99, 95%CI (0.85, 1.15), p = 0.858], DFS [HR = 1.01, 95%CI (0.64, 1.58), p = 0.967], distant metastasis rate [RR = 0.76, 95%CI (0.36,1.59), p = 0.464], and local recurrence rate [RR = 1.30, 95%CI (0.69, 2.47), p = 0.420]. However, there were significant differences in the outcomes of complications [RR = 0.49, 95% CI (0.33, 0.72), p < 0.001], length of hospital stays [WMD = - 5.13, 95%CI (- 6.22, - 4.05), p < 0.001], enterostomy [RR = 0.13, 95%CI (0.05, 0.37), p < 0.001], operative time [- 94.31, 95%CI (- 117.26, - 71.35), p < 0.001], and emotional functioning score [WMD = 2.34, 95% CI (0.94, 3.74), p < 0.001]. CONCLUSION Local resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy may be an effective alternative to radical surgery in patients with early and middle rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shufa Tan
- Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Shaanxi, China
| | - Yan Ou
- Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shaanxi Province, Deputy No. 2, West Weiyang Road, Xianyang City, 712000, China
| | - Shuilan Huang
- Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Shaanxi, China
| | - Qiangqiang Gao
- Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shaanxi Province, Deputy No. 2, West Weiyang Road, Xianyang City, 712000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu PL, Wang DD, Pang CJ, Zhang LZ. Impact of adequate lymph nodes dissection on survival in patients with stage I rectal cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:985324. [DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.985324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and AimsThe NCCN guidelines recommended an assessment of ≥ 12 lymph nodes (LN) as an adequate LN dissection (LND) for rectal cancer (RC). However, the impact of adequate LND on survival in stage I RC patients remained unclear. Thus, we aimed to compare the survival between stage I RC patients with adequate and inadequate LND.MethodsA total of 1,778 stage I RC patients in the SEER database from 2010 to 2017 treated with radical proctectomy were identified. The association between ≥ 12 LND and survival was examined using the multivariate Cox regression and the multivariate competing risk model referenced to < 12 LND.ResultsStage I RC patients with ≥ 12 LND experienced a significantly lower hazard of cancer-specific death compared with those with < 12 LND in both multivariate Cox regression model (adjusted HR [hazard ratio], 0.44, 95% CI, 0.29-0.66; P < 0.001) and the multivariate competing risk model (adjusted subdistribution HR [SHR], 0.45, 95% CI, 0.30-0.69; P < 0.001). Further, subgroup analyses performed by pT stage. No positive association between ≥ 12 LND and survival was found in pT1N0 RC patients (adjusted HR: 0.62, 95%CI, 0.32-1.19; P = 0.149; adjusted SHR: 0.63, 95%CI, 0.33-1.20; P = 0.158), whereas a positive association between ≥ 12 LND and survival was found in pT2N0 RC patients (adjusted HR: 0.35, 95%CI, 0.21-0.58; P < 0.001; adjusted SHR: 0.36, 95%CI, 0.21-0.62; P < 0.001).ConclusionsThe long-term survival benefit of adequate LND was not found in pT1N0 but in pT2N0 RC patients, which suggested that pT2N0 RC patients should be treated with adequate LND and those with inadequate LND might need additional therapy.
Collapse
|
4
|
Peltrini R, Imperatore N, Di Nuzzo MM, Pellino G. Towards personalized treatment of T2N0 rectal cancer: A systematic review of long-term oncological outcomes of neoadjuvant therapy followed by local excision. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 37:1426-1433. [PMID: 35614027 PMCID: PMC9545053 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Total mesorectal excision (TME) remains the treatment of choice in T2N0 tumors. However, evidence suggest that one-size-fits-all approach is not always beneficial for this group of patients. The aim of this study is to synthesize data on long-term outcomes after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) followed by local excision (LE) in T2N0 rectal cancer patients in the perspective of a rectal-preserving strategy. METHODS A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases was conducted until October 2021 to identify studies comparing LE after NAT and TME or reporting oncologic outcomes after conservative approach. A pooled analysis was conducted using a fixed-effect model in the case of non-significant heterogeneity (P > 0.1), and a random effect model (DerSimonian-Laird method) when significant heterogeneity was present (P < 0.1) CRD42022300344. RESULTS Nine studies were included in the analysis. Three of them were comparative studies. The pooled 3-year DFS, 5-year DFS, 3-year OS, 5-year OS, local and distant recurrence rates were 92.8% (95% CI 81.6-99.5%), 91.3% (95% CI 88.3-94.3%), 96.1% (95% CI 90.5-100%), 72.6% (95% CI 57.5-87.7%), 4% (95% CI 18-63%), and 4.9% (95% CI 2-7.8%), respectively, in subjects treated with NAT followed by LE. No heterogeneity was found for all these analyses, except for the 5-year OS sub-analysis (I2 95.5%, P < 0.001). Complete pathological response (ypT0) rate after NAT and LE ranges from 26.7% to 59%. CONCLUSION LE following neoadjuvant CRT may provide comparable survival benefit to radical surgery for patients with clinical stage T2N0 in selected patients although the evidence is still limited to provide solid recommendations. A personalized therapeutic approach taking into account tumor and patient-related factors should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Peltrini
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Nicola Imperatore
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, AORN Antonio Cardarelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Maria Michela Di Nuzzo
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitell", Naples, Italy.,Colorectal Surgery, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) for rectal cancer. SEMINARS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.scrs.2022.100897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
6
|
A nomogram for predicting good response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a retrospective, double-center, cohort study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2022; 37:2157-2166. [PMID: 36048198 PMCID: PMC9560928 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-022-04247-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
AIM The purpose of this study was to explore the clinical factors associated with achieving good response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and to develop and validate a nomogram. METHODS A total of 1724 consecutive LARC patients treated at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital from January 2010 to December 2021 were retrospectively evaluated as the training cohort; 267 consecutive LARC patients treated at Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University during the same period were evaluated as the external 2 cohorts. Based on the pathological results after radical surgery, treatment response was defined as follows: good response, stage ypT0∼2N0M0 and poor response, ypT3∼4N0M0 and/or N positive. Independent influencing factors were analyzed by logistic regression, a nomogram was developed and validated, and the model was evaluated using internal and external data cohorts for validation. RESULTS In the training cohort, 46.6% of patients achieved good response after nCRT combined with radical surgery. The rate of the retained anus was higher in the good response group (93.5% vs. 90.7%, P < 0.001). Cox regression analysis showed that the risk of overall survival and disease-free survival was significantly lower among good response patients than poor response patients, HR = 0.204 (95%CI: 0.146-0.287). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed an independent association with 9 clinical factors, including histopathology, and a nomogram with an excellent predictive response was developed accordingly. The C-index of the predictive accuracy of the nomogram was 0.764 (95%CI: 0.742-0.786), the internal validation of the 200 bootstrap replication mean C-index was 0.764, and the external validation cohort showed an accuracy C-index of 0.789 (95%CI: 0.734-0.844), with good accuracy of the model. CONCLUSION We identified factors associated with achieving good response in LARC after treatment with nCRT and developed a nomogram to contribute to clinical decision-making.
Collapse
|
7
|
Son GM, Lee IY, Cho SH, Park BS, Kim HS, Park SB, Kim HW, Oh SB, Kim TU, Shin DH. Multidisciplinary treatment strategy for early rectal cancer A review. PRECISION AND FUTURE MEDICINE 2021. [DOI: 10.23838/pfm.2021.00163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/08/2022] Open
|
8
|
Choi MS, Huh JW, Shin JK, Park YA, Cho YB, Kim HC, Yun SH, Lee WY. Prognostic Factors and Treatment of Recurrence after Local Excision of Rectal Cancer. Yonsei Med J 2021; 62:1107-1116. [PMID: 34816641 PMCID: PMC8612863 DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2021.62.12.1107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Revised: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Indications for local excision in patients with rectal cancer remain controversial. We reviewed factors affecting survival rate and treatment effectiveness in cancer recurrence after local excision among patients with rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 831 patients was enrolled. Of these, 391 patients were diagnosed with primary rectal cancer and underwent local excision. A retrospective observational study was performed on patients who underwent full-thickness local excision for rectal cancer. RESULTS The median duration of follow-up was 61 months. The overall recurrence rate was 11.5%. The rate of local recurrence was 5.1%. Five-year overall survival rate among recurrent patients was 66.8%; the rate among patients who underwent salvage operation due to recurrence was 84.7%, compared with 44.2% among patients treated with non-operative management (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis of disease-free survival identified distance from the anal verge (p=0.038) and histologic grade (p=0.047) as factors predicting poor prognosis. Multivariate analysis of overall survival showed that age (p<0.001), serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels (p=0.001), and histologic grade (p=0.013) also affected poor prognosis. In subgroup analysis of patients with recurrence, 25 patients underwent reoperation, while 20 patients did not. For 5-year overall survival rate, there was a significant difference between 84.7% of the reoperation group and 44.2% of the non-operation group (p<0.001). CONCLUSION The risk factors affecting overall survival rate after local excision were age 65 years or older, preoperative CEA level 5 or higher, and high histologic grade. In cases of recurrence after local excision of rectal cancer, salvage operation might improve overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moon Suk Choi
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Wook Huh
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Jung Kyong Shin
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yoon Ah Park
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Beom Cho
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hee Cheol Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong Hyeon Yun
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Woo Yong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hrebinko KA, Reitz KM, Mohammed MK, Nassour I, Watson AR, Cunningham KE, Medich DS, Celebrezze JP, Holder-Murray JM. Transanal excision with adjuvant therapy for pT1N0 rectal tumors with high-risk features offers equivalent survival to radical resection: A National Cancer Database analysis. J Surg Oncol 2021; 125:475-483. [PMID: 34705273 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current guidelines favor transabdominal radical resection (RR) over transanal local excision (TAX) followed by adjuvant therapy (TAXa) for pT1N0 rectal tumors with high-risk features. Comparison of oncologic outcomes between these approaches is limited, although the former is associated with increased postoperative morbidity. We hypothesize that such treatment strategies result in equivalent long-term survival. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the National Cancer Database (2010-2016) to identify patients with pT1N0 rectal adenocarcinoma with high-risk features who underwent TAX or RR for curative intent. The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival (OS), evaluated with log-rank and Cox-proportional hazards testing. RESULTS A total of 1159 patients (age 67.4 ± 12.9 years; 56.6% male; 83.3% White) met study criteria, of which 1009 (87.1%) underwent RR and 150 (12.9%) underwent TAXa. Patients undergoing TAXa had shorter lengths of stay (RR = 6.5 days, TAXa = 2.7 days, p < 0.001). The 5-year OS was equivalent between groups. TAX without adjuvant therapy was associated with an increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio 1.81, 95% confidence interval 1.17-2.78, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS This is the largest study to demonstrate equivalent 5-year OS between TAXa and RR for T1N0 rectal cancer with high-risk features. These findings may guide the development of prospective, randomized trials and influence changes in practice recommendations for early-stage rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine A Hrebinko
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Katherine M Reitz
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Maryam K Mohammed
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ibrahim Nassour
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Andrew R Watson
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kellie E Cunningham
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - David S Medich
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - James P Celebrezze
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jennifer M Holder-Murray
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Contemporary snapshot of tumor regression grade (TRG) distribution in locally advanced rectal cancer: a cross sectional multicentric experience. Updates Surg 2021; 73:1795-1803. [PMID: 33818750 PMCID: PMC8500860 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01044-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
Pre-operative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgical resection is still the standard treatment for locally advanced low rectal cancer. Nowadays new strategies are emerging to treat patients with a complete response to pre-operative treatment, rendering the optimal management still controversial and under debate. The primary aim of this study was to obtain a snapshot of tumor regression grade (TRG) distribution after standard CRT. Second, we aimed to identify a correlation between clinical tumor stage (cT) and TRG, and to define the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the restaging setting. Between January 2017 and June 2019, a cross sectional multicentric study was performed in 22 referral centers of colon-rectal surgery including all patients with cT3-4Nx/cTxN1-2 rectal cancer who underwent pre-operative CRT. Shapiro-Wilk test was used for continuous data. Categorical variables were compared with Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test, where appropriate. Accuracy of restaging MRI in the identification of pathologic complete response (pCR) was determined evaluating the correspondence with the histopathological examination of surgical specimens.In the present study, 689 patients were enrolled. Complete tumor regression rate was 16.9%. The "watch and wait" strategy was applied in 4.3% of TRG4 patients. A clinical correlation between more advanced tumors and moderate to absent tumor regression was found (p = 0.03). Post-neoadjuvant MRI had low sensibility (55%) and high specificity (83%) with accuracy of 82.8% in identifying TRG4 and pCR.Our data provided a contemporary description of the effects of pre-operative CRT on a large pool of locally advanced low rectal cancer patients treated in different colon-rectal surgical centers.
Collapse
|
11
|
Devane LA, Burke JP, Kelly JJ, Albert MR. Transanal minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2021; 5:39-45. [PMID: 33532679 PMCID: PMC7832961 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2020] [Revised: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Due to the increased uptake of rectal cancer screening and the increasing rates of complete clinical response to chemoradiotherapy, more early-stage and down-staged rectal cancers are being treated. This has triggered surgeons to question the necessity for proctectomy and its associated morbidity and consider local excision and organ preservation in selected cases. Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) has evolved as an oncologically safe yet cost-effective platform for local excision of rectal tumors using traditional laparoscopic instruments. This review highlights the recent advances and current role of TAMIS in the treatment of rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liam A. Devane
- Department of Colorectal SurgeryBeaumont HospitalDublinIreland
| | - John P. Burke
- Department of Colorectal SurgeryBeaumont HospitalDublinIreland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zheng Z, Wang X, Huang Y, Lu X, Chi P. Predictive value of changes in the level of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:2068-2077. [PMID: 32936987 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this work was to explore the predictive value of changes in the level of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and after surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). METHOD Patients with LARC who underwent nCRT and radical surgery (between 2011 and 2016) were divided into three groups according to pre-nCRT and post-nCRT CA19-9 levels as follows: normal pre-nCRT CA19-9 (normal CA19-9 group), elevated pre-nCRT and normal post-nCRT CA19-9 (normalized group) and elevated pre-nCRT and elevated post-nCRT CA19-9 (nonnormalized group). The pathological nCRT response criteria included ypCR and downstaging (ypStages 0-I). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analysed. RESULTS A total of 721 patients were identified. The normal CA19-9 group was significantly associated with ypCR (n = 159) and downstaging (n = 347) (P < 0.05). The normalized group (n = 76) had worse RFS and OS than the normal CA19-9 group (n = 622) and better RFS and OS than the nonnormalized group (n = 23) (5-year RFS 47.0% vs 66.9% vs 81.5%, P < 0.001; 5-year OS 47.0% vs 75.4% vs 85.0%, P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, CA19-9 group and ypTNM stage were independent predictors of RFS and OS. Moreover, for the 23 patients with elevated post-nCRT CA19-9 levels, the RFS and OS of patients with normalized postoperative CA19-9 levels were significantly better than those of patients with elevated postoperative CA19-9 levels (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Following nCRT, changes in the CA19-9 level are a strong prognostic marker for long-term survival, and they may be helpful in the selection of patients who prefer more conservative surgery after chemoradiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z Zheng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.,Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - X Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.,Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Y Huang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.,Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - X Lu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.,Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - P Chi
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.,Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Primary local excision of stage 1 rectal cancer is not associated with worse oncological outcomes when compared with major resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 2020; 35:607-614. [PMID: 31974752 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03512-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Primary local excision (PLE) for early rectal cancers is associated with decreased surgical morbidity and mortality compared with major resection (MR). However, it is thought to be associated with poorer oncological outcomes. There is a paucity of data regarding PLE within the Australasian population. We present comparative post-operative and survival outcomes for stage 1 rectal cancers treated with PLE or MR from three Western Australian hospitals. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed on a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing PLE or MR for stage 1 rectal cancers between February 1996 and May 2019. RESULTS Of the 533 patients, 81 underwent PLE. Median post-operative admission was shorter for those undergoing PLE, with no significant difference in post-operative complication rate. Five-year overall survival was greater following MR (89.6% CI 86.1-92.3) compared with PLE (84.6% CI 73.8-91.2; p = 0.0003). There was no significant difference in 5-year cancer-specific survival (MR, 94.4% CI 91.5-96.3; PLE, 95.3% CI 86.0-98.5; p = 0.98) or 5-year disease-free survival (MR, 92.3% CI 89.1-94.7; PLE, 89.1% CI 78.5-94.7; p = 0.36). Local excision provided poorer local tumour control with an inferior 5-year local recurrence rate (MR, 2.16% CI 1.08-4.28; PLE, 10.9% CI 5.30-21.6; p = 0.0002). After controlling for confounders, PLE was significantly associated with worse local recurrence but did not significantly impact overall survival, cancer-specific survival, overall recurrence, or metastatic recurrence. CONCLUSION Local excision of early rectal cancer remains a viable alternative, in those unwilling or unable to undergo MR. Patients should be informed that while PLE is associated with poorer local pelvic control, this does not translate to worse survival.
Collapse
|
14
|
Rullier E, Vendrely V, Asselineau J, Rouanet P, Tuech JJ, Valverde A, de Chaisemartin C, Rivoire M, Trilling B, Jafari M, Portier G, Meunier B, Sieleznieff I, Bertrand M, Marchal F, Dubois A, Pocard M, Rullier A, Smith D, Frulio N, Frison E, Denost Q. Organ preservation with chemoradiotherapy plus local excision for rectal cancer: 5-year results of the GRECCAR 2 randomised trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 5:465-474. [PMID: 32043980 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30410-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 121] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Revised: 11/18/2019] [Accepted: 11/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND GRECCAR 2 was the first multicentre, randomised trial to compare local excision with total mesorectal excision in downstaged low rectal cancer. Encouraging oncological results were noted at 3 years' follow-up but needed to be corroborated with longer follow-up. In this study, we aimed to report the 5-year oncological outcomes, including local recurrence, metastatic disease, and survival. METHODS Patients age 18 years and older with T2T3 low rectal cancer, of maximum size 4 cm, who were clinically good responders after chemoradiotherapy (residual tumour ≤2 cm) were randomly assigned before surgery to either local excision or total mesorectal excision. Randomisation was centralised and not stratified and used permuted blocks of size eight. In the local excision group, a completion total mesorectal excision was performed if pathological tumour stage was ypT2-3. The primary objective of this study was to assess the 5-year oncological outcomes of local recurrence, metastatic disease, disease-free survival, overall survival, and cancer-specific mortality, which were the secondary endpoints of GRECCAR 2. We used Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox modelling to estimate and compare recurrence and survival in modified intention-to-treat and as-treated populations. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00427375. FINDINGS Between March 1, 2007, and Sept 24, 2012, 148 patients who were good clinical responders were randomly assigned to treatment, three patients were excluded after randomisation (because they had metastatic disease, tumour >8 cm from anal verge, or withdrew consent), leaving 145 for analysis: 74 in the local excision group and 71 in the total mesorectal excision group. Median follow-up was 60 months (IQR 58-60) in the local excision group and 60 months (57-60) in the total mesorectal excision group. 23 patients died and five were lost to follow-up. In the local excision group, 26 had a completion total mesorectal excision for ypT2-3 tumour. In the modified intention-to-treat analysis, there was no difference between the local excision and total mesorectal excision groups in 5-year local recurrence (7% [95% CI 3-16] vs 7% [3-16]; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·71 [95% CI 0·19-2·58]; p=0·60), metastatic disease (18% [CI 11-30] vs 19% [11-31]; 0·86 [0·36-2·06]; p=0·73), overall survival (84% [73-91] vs 82% [71-90]; 0·92 [0·38-2·22]; p=0·85), disease-free survival (70% [58-79] vs 72% [60-82]; 0·87 [0·44-1·72]; p=0·68), or cancer-specific mortality (7% [3-17] vs 10% [5-20]; 0·65 [0·17-2·49]; p=0·53). INTERPRETATION The 5-year results of this multicentre randomised trial corroborate the 3-year results, providing no evidence of difference in oncological outcomes between local excision and total mesorectal excision. Local excision can be proposed in selected patients having a small T2T3 low rectal cancer with a good clinical response after chemoradiotherapy. FUNDING National Cancer Institute of France.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Rullier
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Haut-Lévèque Hospital, CHU Bordeaux, France.
| | | | - Julien Asselineau
- INSERM CIC1401-EC, Bordeaux, France; CHU Bordeaux, Service d'information médicale, Bordeaux, France
| | - Philippe Rouanet
- Département de Chirurgie Oncologique, ICM Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Alain Valverde
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon, Paris, France
| | | | - Michel Rivoire
- Département de Chirurgie Oncologique, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Bertrand Trilling
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Hôpital A. Michallon, La Tronche, France
| | - Mehrdad Jafari
- Département de Chirurgie Oncologique, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | | | - Bernard Meunier
- Service de Chirurgie Viscérale, CHU Pontchaillou, Rennes, France
| | | | - Martin Bertrand
- Département de Chirurgie Digestive et de Cancérologie Digestive, Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau, Nimes, France
| | - Frédéric Marchal
- Département de Chirurgie Oncologique, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France
| | - Anne Dubois
- Service de Chirurgie Générale et Digestive, Hôtel Dieu, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Marc Pocard
- Département Médico-Chirurgical de Pathologie Digestive, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France
| | - Anne Rullier
- Service d'Anatomopathologie, Hôpital Pellegrin, Bordeaux, CHU Bordeaux, France
| | - Denis Smith
- Service d'Oncologie médicale, Haut-Lévèque Hospital, CHU Bordeaux, France
| | - Nora Frulio
- Service de Radiologie, Haut-Lévèque Hospital, CHU Bordeaux, France
| | - Eric Frison
- INSERM CIC1401-EC, Bordeaux, France; CHU Bordeaux, Service d'information médicale, Bordeaux, France
| | - Quentin Denost
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Haut-Lévèque Hospital, CHU Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mir ZM, Yu D, Merchant SJ, Booth CM, Patel SV. Management of rectal cancer in Canada: an evidence-based comparison of clinical practice guidelines. Can J Surg 2020; 63:E27-E34. [PMID: 31967442 DOI: 10.1503/cjs.017518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Rectal cancer requires a multidisciplinary and multimodality treatment approach. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) provide a framework for delivering consistent, evidence-based health care. We compared provincial/territorial CPGs across Canada to identify areas of variability and evaluate their quality. Methods We retrieved CPGs from Canadian organizations responsible for cancer care oversight and evaluated their quality and developmental methodology using the AGREE-II instrument. Recommendations for diagnostic and staging investigations, treatment by stage, and post-treatment surveillance of stage I–III rectal cancers were abstracted and compared. Results We identified 7 sets of CPGs for analysis, varying in content, presentation, quality, and year last updated. Differences were noted in locoregional staging: 4 recommended magnetic resonance imaging over endorectal ultrasonography, 2 recommended either modality, and 3 specified scenarios for one over the other. Recommendations also varied for use of staging computed tomography of the chest versus chest radiography and for surgical management and indications for transanal excision. Recommendations for neoadjuvant therapy in stage II/III disease also differed: 3 guidelines recommended long-course chemoradiation over short-course radiation therapy alone, while 3 others recommended short-course radiation in specific clinical scenarios. Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II/III disease was uniformly recommended, with variable protocols. The use of proctosigmoidoscopy and interval/duration of endoscopic post-treatment surveillance varied among guidelines. Conclusion Canadian CPGs vary in their recommendations for staging, treatment, and surveillance of rectal cancer. Some of these differences reflect areas with limited definitive evidence. Consistent guidelines with uniform implementation across provinces/territories may lead to more equitable care to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zuhaib M. Mir
- From the Department of Surgery, Queen’s University, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, Ont. (Mir, Yu, Merchant, Patel); and the Department of Oncology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ont. (Booth)
| | - David Yu
- From the Department of Surgery, Queen’s University, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, Ont. (Mir, Yu, Merchant, Patel); and the Department of Oncology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ont. (Booth)
| | - Shaila J. Merchant
- From the Department of Surgery, Queen’s University, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, Ont. (Mir, Yu, Merchant, Patel); and the Department of Oncology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ont. (Booth)
| | - Christopher M. Booth
- From the Department of Surgery, Queen’s University, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, Ont. (Mir, Yu, Merchant, Patel); and the Department of Oncology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ont. (Booth)
| | - Sunil V. Patel
- From the Department of Surgery, Queen’s University, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, Ont. (Mir, Yu, Merchant, Patel); and the Department of Oncology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ont. (Booth)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lai IL, You JF, Chern YJ, Tsai WS, Chiang JM, Hsieh PS, Hung HY, Yeh CY, Chiang SF, Lai CC, Tang RP, Chen JS, Hsu YJ. Survival analysis of local excision vs total mesorectal excision for middle and low rectal cancer in pT1/pT2 stage and intermediate pathological risk. World J Surg Oncol 2019; 17:212. [PMID: 31818295 PMCID: PMC6902326 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-019-1763-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2019] [Accepted: 11/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Local excision (LE) is a feasible treatment approach for rectal cancers in stage pT1 and presents low pathological risk, whereas total mesorectal excision (TME) is a reasonable treatment for more advanced cancers. On the basis of the pathology findings, surgeons may suggest TME for patients receiving LE. This study compared the survival outcomes between LE with/without chemoradiation and TME in mid and low rectal cancer patients in stage pT1/pT2, with highly selective intermediate pathological risk. Methods This retrospective study included 134 patients who received TME and 39 patients who underwent LE for the treatment of intermediate risk (pT1 with poor differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, relatively large tumor, or small-sized pT2 tumor) rectal cancer between 1998 and 2016. Results Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and cumulative recurrence rate (CRR) were similar between the LE (3-year DFS 92%) and TME (3-year DFS 91%) groups. Following subgrouping into an LE with adjuvant therapy group and a TME without adjuvant therapy group, the compared survival outcomes (OS, DFS, and CRR) were found not to be statistically different. The temporary and permanent ostomy rates were higher in the TME group than in the LE group (p < 0.001). Rates of early and late morbidity following surgery were higher in the TME group (p = 0.005), and LE had similar survival compared with TME. Conclusion For patients who had mid and low rectal cancer in stage pT1/pT2 and intermediate pathological risk, LE with chemoradiation presents an alternative treatment option for selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I-Li Lai
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Linkou, 5, Fu-Hsing Street, Guei-Shan, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - Jeng-Fu You
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Linkou, 5, Fu-Hsing Street, Guei-Shan, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - Yih-Jong Chern
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Linkou, 5, Fu-Hsing Street, Guei-Shan, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Sy Tsai
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Linkou, 5, Fu-Hsing Street, Guei-Shan, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - Jy-Ming Chiang
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Linkou, 5, Fu-Hsing Street, Guei-Shan, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - Pao-Shiu Hsieh
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Linkou, 5, Fu-Hsing Street, Guei-Shan, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Yuan Hung
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Linkou, 5, Fu-Hsing Street, Guei-Shan, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Yuh Yeh
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Linkou, 5, Fu-Hsing Street, Guei-Shan, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - Sum-Fu Chiang
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Linkou, 5, Fu-Hsing Street, Guei-Shan, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Chou Lai
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Linkou, 5, Fu-Hsing Street, Guei-Shan, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - Rei-Ping Tang
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Linkou, 5, Fu-Hsing Street, Guei-Shan, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - Jinn-Shiun Chen
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Linkou, 5, Fu-Hsing Street, Guei-Shan, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Jen Hsu
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Linkou, 5, Fu-Hsing Street, Guei-Shan, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Russo S, Anker CJ, Abdel-Wahab M, Azad N, Das P, Dragovic J, Goodman KA, Herman JM, Jones W, Kennedy T, Konski A, Kumar R, Lee P, Patel NM, Sharma N, Small W, Suh WW, Jabbour SK. Executive Summary of the American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for Local Excision in Rectal Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 105:977-993. [PMID: 31445109 PMCID: PMC11101014 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.08.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2019] [Revised: 08/02/2019] [Accepted: 08/11/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The goal of treatment for early stage rectal cancer is to optimize oncologic outcome while minimizing effect of treatment on quality of life. The standard of care treatment for most early rectal cancers is radical surgery alone. Given the morbidity associated with radical surgery, local excision for early rectal cancers has been explored as an alternative approach associated with lower rates of morbidity. The American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria presented in this manuscript are evidence-based guidelines for the use of local excision in early stage rectal cancer that include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) used by a multidisciplinary expert panel to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment. These guidelines are intended for the use of all practitioners and patients who desire information regarding the use of local excision in rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne Russo
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine and University Hospitals, Cleveland, Ohio.
| | | | - May Abdel-Wahab
- International Atomic Energy Agency, Division of Human Health, New York, New York
| | - Nilofer Azad
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Prajnan Das
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | - Joseph M Herman
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - William Jones
- UT Health Cancer Center, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas
| | | | - Andre Konski
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Chester County Hospital, West Chester, Pennsylvania
| | - Rachit Kumar
- Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, Arizona
| | - Percy Lee
- University of California, Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Navesh Sharma
- Milton S. Hershey Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | | | - W Warren Suh
- Ridley-Tree Cancer Center Santa Barbara @ Sansum Clinic, Santa Barbara California
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Local excision following chemoradiotherapy in T2-T3 rectal cancer: current status and critical appraisal. Updates Surg 2019; 72:29-37. [PMID: 31621033 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-019-00689-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2019] [Accepted: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Local excision following chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer is an organ-preserving procedure which aims at reducing morbidity and functional disorders associated with total mesorectal excision (TME) in selected patients. Although TME after chemoradiotherapy remains the gold standard for locally advanced mid and low rectal cancer, in the last years multicenter research trials have offered encouraging oncologic results which have allowed to preserve the rectum in patients with a pathologic complete response after chemoradiotherapy. A review of the available literature on this topic was conducted to define the state of the art of this conservative approach and to focus on the most controversial aspects concerning local excision performed after chemoradiotherapy, in particular tumor scatter and lymph node status, completion and salvage surgery, morbidity and quality of life. The analysis of these topics should be considered, in trial setting or in current practice, for their clinical implications. Oncologic outcomes of recent trials are encouraging for part of the patients presenting T2 rectal cancer; however, TME still remains the standard treatment in clinical practice. In such cases, local excision should include a surgical safety margin of at least 1 cm from the resection margin to achieve a true negative margin from residual tumor cells. The selection of the patients should be carefully performed and their consensus extremely detailed because TME is necessary in about 30% of cases. Failing that, morbidity and quality of life are negatively affected. However, about half of these patients refuse radical surgery (45%), thus undergoing only palliative care.
Collapse
|
19
|
Erkan A, Mendez A, Trepanier M, Kelly J, Nassif G, Albert MR, Lee L, Monson JR. Impact of residual nodal involvement after complete tumor response in patients undergoing neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Surgery 2019; 166:648-654. [DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.03.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2019] [Revised: 03/18/2019] [Accepted: 03/29/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
20
|
Dapri G, Bascombe NA, Soloviy M, Kouatang A, Martinez Mena C. Transanal endolaparoscopic resection of T2N0M0 low rectal adenocarcinoma followed by adjuvant therapy. Colorectal Dis 2019; 21:970-971. [PMID: 31055878 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2019] [Accepted: 04/08/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- G Dapri
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, European School of Laparoscopic Surgery, Saint-Pierre University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.,Laboratory of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Mons, Mons, Belgium
| | - N A Bascombe
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, European School of Laparoscopic Surgery, Saint-Pierre University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - M Soloviy
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, European School of Laparoscopic Surgery, Saint-Pierre University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - A Kouatang
- Department of Oncology, Saint-Pierre University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
| | - C Martinez Mena
- Department of Oncology, Saint-Pierre University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lee JL, Lim SB, Yu CS, Park IJ, Yoon YS, Kim CW, Park SH, Lee JS, Hong YS, Kim SY, Kim JE, Kim JH, Park JH, Kim J, Han M. Local excision in mid-to-low rectal cancer patients who revealed clinically total or near-total regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy; a proposed trial. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:404. [PMID: 31035949 PMCID: PMC6489182 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5581-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2018] [Accepted: 04/04/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (pre-CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) is currently a standard therapy for locally advanced mid-to-low rectal cancer. Less aggressive, organ-preserving option such as local excision (LE) or watchful wait can alternatively be used for patients who respond well to pre-CRT. High-resolution rectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the most useful methods to assess pre-CRT response, and the MERCURY group has shown that the MR tumor regression grade (mrTRG) correlated with the pathologic TRG. The aim of this study is to compare postoperative complication and oncologic outcomes between LE and TME in mid-to-low rectal cancer patients whose tumors are mrTRG grade 1 (radiological complete remission) or 2 (predominant fibrosis; near-complete remission) after pre-CRT. Methods A prospective, double-arm, randomized, open-labeled, single center, clinical trial will be conducted in patients with mid-to-low rectal cancer whose tumors are mrTRG 1/2 after pre-CRT at the Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, after approval from the Institution Review Board. Patient medical records will be de-identified using a serial number to protect personal information. Inclusion criteria will include rectal adenocarcinoma with an inferior border < 8 cm from the anal verge, mrTRG 1/2, age > 20, and provision of informed consent. Postoperative complications will be assessed by Clavien-Dindo Classification Grade. Oncologic and functional outcomes will be collected and risk factors related to these outcomes will be investigated. Discussion We believed that the rate of postoperative complication of LE will be comparable to that of TME in mid-to-low advanced rectal cancer patients with a favorable response after pre-CRT. Trial registration KCT0002579 (https://cris.nih.go.kr) Dec-2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jong Lyul Lee
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Seok-Byung Lim
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Chang Sik Yu
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.
| | - In Ja Park
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Yong Sik Yoon
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Chan Wook Kim
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Seong Ho Park
- Department of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Jong Seok Lee
- Department of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Yong Sang Hong
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Sun Young Kim
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Jeong Eun Kim
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Jong Hoon Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Jin-Hong Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Jihun Kim
- Department of Pathology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| | - Minkyu Han
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Jones HJS, Goodbrand S, Hompes R, Mortensen N, Cunningham C. Radiotherapy after local excision of rectal cancer may offer reduced local recurrence rates. Colorectal Dis 2019; 21:451-459. [PMID: 30585677 DOI: 10.1111/codi.14546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2018] [Accepted: 11/26/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM Early rectal cancer can be managed effectively with local excision, which is now the standard of care for many T1 lesions. However, the presence of unexpected adverse histopathological factors may indicate an increased risk of local recurrence, prompting consideration of completion radical surgery. Many patients are unfit or prefer to avoid radical surgery, relying instead on surveillance and early detection of recurrent disease. Recently, radiotherapy has shown promise as an adjuvant therapy in this group. This study assesses local recurrence rates after local excision with adjuvant radiotherapy at a single centre. METHOD This was a retrospective review of a prospective database of all patients undergoing transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) in a single institution. Data covering a 10-year period were analysed. RESULTS Of 197 patients undergoing TEM for rectal cancer, 33 (17%) had adjuvant radiotherapy because of adverse histopathological features. At 3.2 years' median follow-up, there were three instances of local recurrence (9.1%). Estimated local recurrence at 1 and 3 years was 0% and 6.9%, compared to 16.8% and 21.2% in a propensity-score-matched group who were followed by surveillance alone. Local recurrence was diagnosed at a median of 23 months post-TEM in the radiotherapy group, compared to 8 months in the matched group. CONCLUSION Radiotherapy after TEM is associated with a trend towards a reduced rate of local recurrence, even for high-risk disease. Radiotherapy would appear to offer a viable alternative to radical completion surgery in the presence of unforeseen adverse histopathological features, as long as a meticulous surveillance programme is in place.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H J S Jones
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - S Goodbrand
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - R Hompes
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - N Mortensen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - C Cunningham
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Song J, Huang X, Chen Z, Chen M, Lin Q, Li A, Chen Y, Xu B. Predictive value of carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 related to downstaging to stage 0-I after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. Cancer Manag Res 2018; 10:3101-3108. [PMID: 30214303 PMCID: PMC6124794 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s166417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To explore the value of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) in predicting downstaging to stage 0–I cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer. Materials and methods We respectively investigated pretreatment CEA, pretreatment CA19-9, posttreatment CEA, posttreatment CA19-9, pre–post-CA19-9 ratio, and pre–post-CEA ratio in 674 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer receiving nCRT and determined the patients’ thresholds by using the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The association between downstaging (stage 0–I after nCRT), pathological complete response, and clinicopathological parameters was evaluated using the Pearson χ2 test. The clinicopathological parameters which were found to be significantly associated with downstaging were analyzed by logistic regression models and were incorporated into a scoring system. Results Multivariate analysis showed that pretreatment CA19-9 level, posttreatment CEA level, pre–post-CEA ratio, and pre–post-CA19-9 ratio were significantly correlated with downstaging. Area under the curve of the scoring system was higher than that of parameters alone. Conclusion The 4-factor scoring system with CA19-9 level, posttreatment CEA level, pre– post-CEA ratio, and pre–post-CA19-9 ratio is of more value in predicting downstaging to stage 0–I patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after nCRT than using the parameters alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianyuan Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China,
| | - Xiaoxue Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China,
| | - Zhuhong Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China,
| | - Mingqiu Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China,
| | - Qingliang Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China,
| | - Anchuan Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China,
| | - Yuangui Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China,
| | - Benhua Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China,
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Dapri G, Yi LQ, Ng CWA, Enjiu PT, Lin SH, Lee DJK, Tan KY, Mantoo S. Transanal minimally invasive full-thickness anterior middle rectum polyp resection - video vignette. Colorectal Dis 2017; 20:257-259. [PMID: 29205783 DOI: 10.1111/codi.13981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2017] [Accepted: 11/09/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Rectal preservation is gaining popularity in the surgical treatment of degenerated rectal polyps or early rectal cancer (1,2). Tis/T1 rectal lesions can be safely treated without chemoradiation (3). Treatment by transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) offers more advantages than endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) (4). The authors report a 60 year-old woman who underwent TAMIS for a large polyp located anteriorly in the middle 1/3 of the rectum, 7 cm from the dentate line and staged preoperatively as uTisN0M0. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Dapri
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, European School of Laparoscopic Surgery, Saint-Pierre University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
- Laboratory of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Mons, Mons, Belgium
| | - Lee Qin Yi
- Department of Surgery, Khoo Teck Puat University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Chin Wei Adele Ng
- Department of Surgery, Khoo Teck Puat University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Pauleon Tan Enjiu
- Department of Surgery, Khoo Teck Puat University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Sim Hsein Lin
- Department of Surgery, Khoo Teck Puat University Hospital, Singapore
| | | | - Kok Yang Tan
- Department of Surgery, Khoo Teck Puat University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Surendra Mantoo
- Department of Surgery, Khoo Teck Puat University Hospital, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|