1
|
AlTawil E, Kalagi NA, Alzahrani S, Alobeed F, Alshammari S, Bin Traiki T. The relationship between baseline nutritional status with subsequent parenteral nutrition and clinical outcomes in cancer patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery: a retrospective study. Front Nutr 2024; 11:1364959. [PMID: 38765813 PMCID: PMC11099224 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1364959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) with Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) is the preferred treatment for peritoneal malignancies. This highly complex operation is associated with a high incidence of complications, particularly due to malnutrition. This study aimed to investigate the potential association between preoperative nutritional status and postoperative clinical outcomes in adult cancer patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC for peritoneal malignancy. Methods A retrospective study with 140 adult cancer patients, on parenteral nutrition (PN) (n = 40) and not on PN (n = 100) who underwent CRS with or without HIPEC, was conducted. Results Patients who received PN had significantly longer post-operative, hospital, and ICU LOS than those who did not (p = 0.001). ICU admission was significantly higher in the non-PN receiving group compared to the PN receiving group. When compared to the PN group, the majority of patients not receiving PN were at low risk of malnutrition (91% vs. 75%, p = 0.020), whereas 17.5% of PN patients were at risk of malnutrition during hospitalization. Multiple regression analyses revealed a strong positive relationship between patients with increased risk of malnutrition and ICU LOS (p = 0.047). Discussion Routine preoperative nutrition assessment is essential to identify patients who are at higher nutritional risk, and nutrition support should be provided preoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esraa AlTawil
- Clinical Pharmacy Services, Pharmacy Department, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nora A. Kalagi
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sohailah Alzahrani
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Faisal Alobeed
- College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sulaiman Alshammari
- Colorectal Research Chair, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Thamer Bin Traiki
- Colorectal Research Chair, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Florissi I, Radomski SN, Shou B, Cloyd JM, Kim A, Grotz T, Fournier K, Baumgartner JM, Lambert L, Abbott DE, Schwartz P, Staley CA, Clarke C, Dineen S, Patel SH, Wilson GC, Raoof M, Johnston FM, Greer JB. Weekend Discharge Is Not Associated With Increased Readmission After Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. J Surg Res 2024; 293:403-412. [PMID: 37806228 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.08.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We explored the association between weekend discharge and 30- and 90-d readmission rates in patients undergoing hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) for peritoneal carcinomatosis. METHODS The US HIPEC Collaborative database, comprised of a longitudinal cohort of patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis at twelve academic institutions between 2000 and 2017, was queried for date of discharge information. Patients were retrospectively divided into weekday and weekend/holiday discharge groups. Patients <18 y old, lacking day of discharge information, or who experienced intraoperative/in-hospital mortality were excluded. Comparisons were made between patients discharged on a weekday versus those discharged on a weekend or major holiday. RESULTS 1415 patients met inclusion criteria for the study: 1108 (78%) patients with a weekday discharge and 308 (22%) with a weekend/holiday discharge. Median age at time of surgery was 55 y (Interquartile Range: 46-63); 59% (n = 841) patients were female, 25% (n = 328) of patients had high volume disease (defined as a peritoneal cancer index >20 intraoperatively), and 92% (n = 1210) of patients had a complete cytoreduction (defined as a completeness of cytoreduction score of 0 or 1). Overall, 15% (n = 218) of patients were readmitted within 30 d and 19% (n = 265) within 90 d. In a linear mixed effects model, weekend discharge was not associated with higher 30- or 90-d readmissions (P = 0.291, P = 0.743). CONCLUSIONS Weekend discharges are safe following CRS/HIPEC. Length of stay initiatives should focus on discharging the patient when medically ready, rather than avoiding weekend discharge out of an abundance of caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabella Florissi
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Shannon N Radomski
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Benjamin Shou
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Alex Kim
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Travis Grotz
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Keith Fournier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Joel M Baumgartner
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Laura Lambert
- Peritoneal Surface Malignancy Program, Section of Surgical Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Daniel E Abbott
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Patrick Schwartz
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Charles A Staley
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Callisia Clarke
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Sean Dineen
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida
| | - Sameer H Patel
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Gregory C Wilson
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Mustafa Raoof
- City of Hope National Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Duarte, California
| | - Fabian M Johnston
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jonathan B Greer
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ramos Bernadó MI, Crusellas Maña O, Martín-Baranera M, Barrios Sánchez P. Morbimortality after 1321 consecutive CRS + HIPEC procedures: seeking excellence in surgery for peritoneal surface malignancy. Clin Transl Oncol 2023; 25:2911-2921. [PMID: 37085638 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03155-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC) treatment has classically presented a percentage of associated complications that have limited its expansion. The aim of this study is to describe the morbimortality results obtained from a referral center implemented with the support of a governmental health agency and directed by a surgical team experienced in CRS for Peritoneal Surface Malignancies (PSM). METHODS Data from the Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Program of Catalonia (PCPC) prospective database, including patients who underwent CRS + HIPEC between September 2006 and January 2021, were analyzed. RESULTS A total of 1151 consecutive patients underwent 1321 CRS + HIPEC procedures. Colonic origin of peritoneal metastasis was the most frequent (47.3%). Median PCI was 7 and most patients had CC0-1 (96.1%). Multivisceral resection was performed in 44% of all patients, 57% required digestive anastomosis. Median hospital stay was 11 days (range 6-144 days). High-grade complications occurred in 20% of all patient, most of them surgical complications. Anastomotic leak occurred in 0.6% of all cases. The overall in-stay and 30-day mortality rate was 0.4%. The low-rate of complications and the high rate of complete CRS were achieved from the beginning of the PCPC. Median overall survival was 54.7 months, with a 5-year survival rate of 47.5%. CONCLUSIONS Implementation of a CRS + HIPEC referral program for the treatment of PSM with preferably an experienced surgical team enables acceptable rates of severe morbidity (20%) and mortality (< 1%).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Oriol Crusellas Maña
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Moisès Broggi, Consorci Sanitari Integral, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Montserrat Martín-Baranera
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Hospital Moisès Broggi, Consorci Sanitari Integral, Barcelona, Spain
- Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Autonomous University of Barcelona School of Medicine, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pedro Barrios Sánchez
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Moisès Broggi, Consorci Sanitari Integral, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Prophylactic use of incisional negative pressure wound therapy for the prevention of surgical site occurrences in general surgery: Consensus document. Surgery 2023; 173:1052-1059. [PMID: 36588049 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.11.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical site occurrences pose a threat to patient health, potentially resulting in significant increases in health care spending caused by using additional resources. The objective of this study was to reach a consensus among a group of experts in incisional negative pressure wound therapy to determine the indications for using this type of treatment prophylactically and to analyze the associated risk factors of surgical site occurrences in abdominal surgery. METHODS A group of experts in incisional negative pressure wound therapy from Spain and Portugal was formed among general surgery specialists who frequently perform colorectal, esophagogastric, or abdominal wall surgery. The Coordinating Committee performed a bibliographic search to identify the most relevant publications and to create a summary table to serve as a decision-making protocol regarding the use of prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy based on factors related to the patient and type of procedure. RESULTS The patient risk factors associated with surgical site occurrence development such as age, immunosuppression, anticoagulation, hypoalbuminemia, smoking, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, diabetes, obesity, and malnutrition were analyzed. For surgical procedure factors, surgical time, repeated surgeries, organ transplantation, need for blood transfusion, complex abdominal wall reconstruction, surgery at a contaminated site, open abdomen closure, emergency surgery, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy were analyzed. CONCLUSION In our experience, this consensus has been achieved on a tailored set of recommendations on patient and surgical aspects that should be considered to reduce the risk of surgical site occurrences with the use of prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy, particularly in areas where the evidence base is controversial or lacking.
Collapse
|
5
|
Gearing PF, Hawke JA, Mohan H, Heriot AG, Khan A, Beaumont A, Laing E, Waters PS. Perioperative nutritional assessment and interventions in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): A systematic review. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:902-917. [PMID: 36872111 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2022] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peritoneal carcinomatosis is a catabolic state and cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is a high morbidity operation. Optimising perioperative nutrition is crucial to improve outcomes. This systematic review sought to examine literature describing clinical outcomes related to preoperative nutrition status and nutrition interventions in patients undergoing CRS with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). METHODS A systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (300326). A search of eight electronic databases was undertaken on 8th May 2022 and reported according to the PRISMA statement. Studies reporting nutrition status through use of screening and assessment tools, nutrition interventions or nutrition-related clinical outcomes for patients undergoing CRS with HIPEC were included. RESULTS Of 276 screened studies, 25 studies were included for review. Commonly used nutrition assessment tools for CRS-HIPEC patients included Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), sarcopenia assessment with computed tomography, preoperative albumin, and body mass index (BMI). Three retrospective studies compared SGA with postoperative outcomes. Malnourished patients were more likely to have postoperative infectious complications (p = 0.042 SGA-B, p = 0.025 SGA-C). Malnutrition was significantly associated with increased hospital length of stay (LOS) in two studies (p = 0.006, p = 0.02), and with overall survival in another study (p = 0.006). Eight studies analysing preoperative albumin levels reported conflicting associations with postoperative outcomes. BMI in five studies was not associated with morbidity. One study did not support routine nasogastric tube (NGT) feeding. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative nutritional assessment tools, including SGA and objective sarcopaenia measures, have a role in predicting nutritional status for CRS-HIPEC patients. Optimisation of nutrition is important for preventing complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter F Gearing
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Justin A Hawke
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Helen Mohan
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Alexander G Heriot
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ayman Khan
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Anna Beaumont
- Nutrition and Speech Pathology Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Erin Laing
- Nutrition and Speech Pathology Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Peadar S Waters
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Wilton Road, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Complications and Mortality Rate of Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Italian Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Oncoteam Results Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14235824. [PMID: 36497306 PMCID: PMC9741330 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy may significantly improve survival for selected patients with peritoneal surface malignancies, but it has always been criticized due to the high incidence of postoperative morbidity and mortality. METHODS Data were collected from nine Italian centers with peritoneal surface malignancies expertise within a collaborative group of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology. Complications and mortality rates were recorded, and multivariate Cox analysis was used to identify risk factors. RESULTS The study included 2576 patients. The procedure was mostly performed for ovarian (27.4%) and colon cancer (22.4%). The median peritoneal cancer index was 13. Overall postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were 34% and 1.6%. A total of 232 (9%) patients required surgical reoperation. Multivariate regression logistic analysis identified the type of perfusion (p ≤ 0.0001), body mass index (p ≤ 0.0001), number of resections (p ≤ 0.0001) and colorectal resections (p ≤ 0.0001) as the strongest predictors of complications, whereas the number of resections (p ≤ 0.0001) and age (p = 0.01) were the strongest predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is a valuable option of treatment for selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis providing low postoperative morbidity and mortality rates, if performed in high-volume specialized centers.
Collapse
|
7
|
Predictors of Small Bowel Obstruction Post-Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26:2176-2183. [PMID: 35852704 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05394-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) for peritoneal malignancies carries considerable morbidity; however, the significance of postoperative small bowel obstruction (SBO) is not well defined. We aim to identify predictors for post-CRS/HIPEC SBO and their oncologic associations. METHODS A retrospective review was conducted of all CRS/HIPEC cases performed at a surgical oncology center (2013-2018). Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, perioperative factors, and province-wide hospital readmissions were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were used for baseline characteristics, multivariate logistic regression for predictors of SBO at 1 year, and Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test for survival analysis. RESULTS A total of n = 97 CRS/HIPEC procedures were performed for diagnoses of low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (44%), high-grade appendiceal adenocarcinoma (8%), colorectal adenocarcinoma (34%), and mesothelioma (9%). The median peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) score was 16. Cumulative incidence of post-CRS/HIPEC SBO readmission was 24% at 1 year and 38% at 2 and 3 years. Of 29 patients readmitted with SBO, 14 (48%) had more than one readmission for SBO, and nine surgeries were performed for obstruction. Multivariate regression identified significant independent predictors of SBO within 1-year post-CRS/HIPEC as high-grade appendiceal or colorectal primaries (odds ratio [OR] 4.58, p = 0.02) and PCI ≥ 20 (OR 3.27, p = 0.05). Overall survival (OS) was worse in patients readmitted with SBO within 1 year compared to those without (3-year OS 58% vs. 75%, p = 0.017). CONCLUSION SBO is the most common readmission diagnosis post-CRS/HIPEC and is associated with worse survival. High-grade appendiceal and colorectal primary tumors and PCI ≥ 20 are predictors for SBO.
Collapse
|
8
|
Mor E, Shemla S, Assaf D, Laks S, Benvenisti H, Hazzan D, Shiber M, Shacham-Shmueli E, Margalit O, Halpern N, Boursi B, Beller T, Perelson D, Purim O, Zippel D, Ben-Yaacov A, Nissan A, Adileh M. Natural History and Management of Small-Bowel Obstruction in Patients After Cytoreductive Surgery and Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:8566-8579. [PMID: 35941342 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12370-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Small-bowel obstruction (SBO) after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is a common complication associated with re-admission that may alter patients' outcomes. Our aim was to characterize and investigate the impact of bowel obstruction on patients' prognosis. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of patients with SBO after CRS/HIPEC (n = 392). We analyzed patients' demographics, operative and perioperative details, SBO re-admission data, and long-term oncological outcomes. RESULTS Out of 366 patients, 73 (19.9%) were re-admitted with SBO. The cause was adhesive in 42 (57.5%) and malignant (MBO) in 31 (42.5%). The median time to obstruction was 7.7 months (range, 0.5-60.9). Surgical intervention was required in 21/73 (28.7%) patients. Obstruction eventually resolved (spontaneous or by surgical intervention) in 56/73 (76.7%) patients. Univariant analysis identified intraperitoneal chemotherapy agents: mitomycin C (MMC) (HR 3.2, p = 0.003), cisplatin (HR 0.3, p = 0.03), and doxorubicin (HR 0.25, p = 0.018) to be associated with obstruction-free survival (OFS). Postoperative complications such as surgical site infection (SSI), (HR 2.2, p = 0.001) and collection (HR 2.07, p = 0.015) were associated with worse OFS. Multivariate analysis maintained MMC (HR 2.9, p = 0.006), SSI (HR 1.19, p = 0.001), and intra-abdominal collection (HR 2.19, p = 0.009) as independently associated with OFS. While disease-free survival was similar between the groups, overall survival (OS) was better in the non-obstruction group compared with the obstruction group (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS SBO after CRS/HIPEC is common and complex in management. Although conservative management was successful in most patients, surgery was required more frequently in patients with MBO. Patients with SBO demonstrate decreased survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eyal Mor
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Shanie Shemla
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Dan Assaf
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Shachar Laks
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Haggai Benvenisti
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - David Hazzan
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Mai Shiber
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Einat Shacham-Shmueli
- The Department of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Ofer Margalit
- The Department of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Naama Halpern
- The Department of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Ben Boursi
- The Department of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Tamar Beller
- The Department of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Daria Perelson
- The Department of Anesthesiology, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Ofer Purim
- The Department of Oncology, Assuta Ashdod Public Hospital, Affiliated with the Faculty of Health and Science, Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheba, Israel, Ashdod, Israel
| | - Douglas Zippel
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Almog Ben-Yaacov
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Aviram Nissan
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Mohammad Adileh
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rieser CJ, Alvikas J, Phelos H, Hall LB, Zureikat AH, Lee A, Ongchin M, Holtzman MP, Pingpank JF, Bartlett DL, Choudry MHA. Failure to Thrive Following Cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Causes and Consequences. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:2630-2639. [PMID: 34988834 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11100-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Failure to thrive (FTT) is a complex syndrome of nutritional failure and functional decline. Readmission for FTT following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS HIPEC) is common but underexamined. This study aims to determine features, risk factors, and prognostic significance of FTT following CRS HIPEC. PATIENTS AND METHODS We reviewed patients who underwent CRS HIPEC from 2010 to 2018 at our institution. Patients were categorized into no readmission, FTT readmission, and other readmission. FTT was determined by coding and chart review. We compared baseline characteristics, oncologic data, perioperative outcomes, and survival among the three cohorts. RESULTS Of 1068 discharges examined, 379 patients (36%) were readmitted within 90 days, of which 134 (12.5%) were labeled as FTT. Patients with FTT readmission had worse preoperative functional status, higher rates of malnutrition, more complex resections, longer hospital stays, and more postoperative complications (all p < 0.001). Ostomy creation [relative risk ratio (RRR) 4.06], in-hospital venous thromboembolism (VTE), discharge to nursing home (RRR 2.48), pre-CRS HIPEC chemotherapy (RRR 1.98), older age (RRR 1.84), and female gender (RRR 1.69) were all independent predictors for FTT readmission on multinomial regression (all p < 0.01). FTT readmission was associated with worse median overall survival on multivariate analysis [hazard ratio (HR) 1.60, p < 0.001] after controlling for oncologic, perioperative, and baseline factors. CONCLUSIONS FTT is common following CRS HIPEC and appears to be associated with baseline patient characteristics, operative burden, and postoperative complications. Perioperative strategies for improving nutrition and activity, along with early recognition and intervention in FTT may improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline J Rieser
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Jurgis Alvikas
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Heather Phelos
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Lauren B Hall
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Andrew Lee
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Melanie Ongchin
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Matthew P Holtzman
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - James F Pingpank
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David L Bartlett
- AHN Cancer Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - M Haroon A Choudry
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Peng JS, LaPiano J, Wang K, Attwood K, Skitzki JJ, Kane JM, Francescutti VA. Restrictive Intraoperative Fluid Rate is Associated with Improved Outcomes in Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:163-173. [PMID: 34383185 PMCID: PMC8715760 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10556-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 07/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CS/HIPEC) has historically favored liberal fluid administration owing to lengthy duration of surgery and hyperthermia. This practice has been challenged in recent years with studies demonstrating improved outcomes with restrictive fluid administration. METHODS Patients who underwent CS/HIPEC between March 2010 and September 2018 were included for analysis. Patients who received an above-median fluid rate (high-IVF) versus below-median fluid rate (low-IVF) were compared, and multivariate analyses were performed for length of stay, 90-day unplanned readmissions, and major complications. RESULTS The 167 patients had a mean age of 56.7 ± 11.4 years and body mass index of 29.5 ± 6.9 kg/m2. The median rate of total intraoperative crystalloid and colloid was 7.4 mL/kg/h. The low-IVF group had less blood loss (183 vs. 330 mL, p = 0.002), were less likely to need intraoperative vasopressor drip (2.4% vs. 11.9%, p = 0.018), and experienced fewer cardiac complications (2.4% vs. 10.7%, p = 0.031), pneumonias (0% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.024), and Clavien-Dindo grade 3-5 complications (14.5% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.004). Multivariate analyses identified bowel resection (HR 4.65, p = 0.0008) as a risk factor for 90-day unplanned readmission, while bowel resection, intraoperative fluid rate, and estimated blood loss were associated with increased length of stay. CONCLUSION Higher intraoperative fluid intake was associated with multiple postoperative complications and increased length of stay, and represents a potentially avoidable risk factor for morbidity in CS/HIPEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- June S. Peng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA,Department of Surgery, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA USA
| | - Jessica LaPiano
- Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Katy Wang
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Kristopher Attwood
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Joseph J. Skitzki
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - John M. Kane
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fayed M, Angappan S, Oyibo O, Valliani A. Role of Imaging Studies in Evaluating Patients Post Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. Cureus 2021; 13:e20601. [PMID: 35103177 PMCID: PMC8782632 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.20601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
A 77-year-old male presented to the ED with a new onset of acute abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. He had a previous surgical history of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for an appendiceal tumor. Despite the repeated reassuring abdominal examinations, CT abdomen showed high-grade bowel obstruction and perforation. He was urgently taken to the operating room and underwent resection of 70 cm segment of small ischemic bowel with primary anastomosis. His postoperative course was complicated with atrial fibrillation (AF) requiring cardioversion and medical therapy. Later, he was discharged home under stable conditions. Relying on abdominal signs, an abdominal exam in a patient with a previous history of extensive peritonectomy and post-HIPEC surgery is challenging due to the altered peritoneal anatomy. As a result, the abdominal examination findings can be benign and misleading. This can lead to delayed surgical intervention, thereby increasing morbidity and mortality significantly. Therefore, a detailed evaluation with a low threshold for abdominal imaging studies like abdominal X-rays and CT abdomen series is warranted in this subset of patients.
Collapse
|
12
|
Moon EW, Wong JSM, See AHM, Ong WS, Tan CA, Ong CAJ, Chia CS, Soo KC, Teo MCC, Tan GHC. Predicting Early and Late Readmissions Following Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:6613-6624. [PMID: 34304310 PMCID: PMC8460494 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10414-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Background Postoperative readmissions not only burden the healthcare system but may also affect clinical outcomes of cancer patients. Despite this, little is known about readmissions after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), or their impact on survival outcomes. Patients and Methods A single-institution retrospective cohort study of CRS-HIPEC procedures from April 2001 and September 2019 was performed. Early readmission (ERA) was defined as hospitalization within 30 days of discharge post-CRS/HIPEC, while late readmission (LRA) was defined as hospitalization between day 31 and 90 after discharge. Patient demographic, oncological, and perioperative factors were analyzed to identify predictors of readmission, and comparison of survival outcomes was performed. Results Overall, 342 patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC were included in the study. The incidence of ERA and LRA was 18.5% and 7.4%, respectively. High-grade postoperative complication was the only independent predictor of ERA (HR 3.64, 95% CI 1.47–9.02), while comorbid hypertension (HR 2.71, 95% CI 1.17–6.28) and stoma creation (HR 2.83, 95% CI 1.23–6.50) were independent predictors for LRA. Patients with readmission had significantly worse disease-free survival than patients who had no readmission (NRA) (LRA 1.1 years, ERA 1.2 years, NRA 1.8 years, p = 0.002), and patients with LRA had worse median overall survival (2.1 years) than ERA patients (3.3 years) or patients without readmission (4.4 years) (p < 0.001). Conclusions Readmission following CRS-HIPEC is associated with adverse survival outcomes. In particular, LRA may portend worse prognosis than ERA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eui Whan Moon
- Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jolene Si Min Wong
- Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Amanda Hui Min See
- Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Whee Sze Ong
- Department of Clinical Trials and Epidemiological Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chee Ann Tan
- Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chin-Ann Johnny Ong
- Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,Laboratory of Applied Human Genetics, Division of Medical Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Oncology Academic Clinical Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.,Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, A*STAR Research Entities, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Claramae Shulyn Chia
- Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Oncology Academic Clinical Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Khee Chee Soo
- Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Oncology Academic Clinical Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Melissa Ching Ching Teo
- Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Oncology Academic Clinical Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Grace Hwei Ching Tan
- Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Perianesthesia Care of the Oncologic Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Study. J Perianesth Nurs 2021; 36:543-552. [PMID: 34303613 DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2020.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2020] [Revised: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study was to understand the perianesthesia care for patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC). METHOD This is a retrospective study. DESIGN The perioperative electronic medical records of 189 CRS + HIPEC surgical cases at a hospital of Western Pennsylvania from 2012 to 2018 were analyzed to study the characteristics of perianesthesia care for CRS + HIPEC surgery. FINDINGS The patients' median age was 57 (range 21-83) years, and 60% were men. The mean anesthesia time was 10.47 ± 2.54 hours. Most tumors were appendix or colorectal in origin, and the mean peritoneal cancer index score was 16.19 ± 8.76. The mean estimated blood loss was 623 ± 582 mL. The mean total intravenous crystalloid administered was 8,377 ± 4,100 mL. Fifty-two patients received packed red blood cells during surgery. Postoperatively, 100% of the patients were transferred to the intensive care unit. A majority (52%) of patients were extubated in the operating room. Median lengths of hospital and intensive care unit stays were 13 and 2 days, respectively. A majority (73%) of patients had 1 or more postoperative complications and 29% of patients experienced major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher) during the hospital stay. Prolonged hospitalization was owing to gastrointestinal dysfunctions and respiratory failure related to atelectasis and pleural effusion. CONCLUSIONS CRS + HIPEC is a major surgery with numerous challenges to the perianesthesia care team regarding hemodynamic adjustment, pain control, and postoperative complications, which demand training and future studies from the perianesthesia care team.
Collapse
|
14
|
The impact of gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks on survival of patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Am J Surg 2021; 223:331-338. [PMID: 33832737 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.03.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2020] [Revised: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastrointestinal (GI) leaks after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is a known life-threatening complication that may alter patients' outcomes. Our aim is to investigate risk factors associated with GI leaks and evaluate the impact of GI leaks on patient's oncological outcomes. METHODS A retrospective analysis of perioperative and oncological outcomes of patients with and without GI leaks after CRS/HIPEC. RESULTS Out of 191 patients included in this study, GI leaks were identified in 17.8% (34/191) of patients. Small bowel anastomoses were the most common site (44%). Most of the GI leaks were managed conservatively and re-operation was needed in 44.1% of cases. Univariate analysis identified higher PCI (p = 0.03), higher number of packed cells transfused (p = 0.036), pelvic peritonectomy (p = 0.013), high number of anastomoses (p = 0.003) and colonic resection (p = 0.042) as factors associated with GI leaks. Multivariate analysis identified stapled anastomoses (OR 2.59, p = 0.001) and pelvic peritonectomy (OR 2.33, p = 0.044) as independent factors associated with GI leaks. Disease-free survival tended to be worse in the leak group but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.235). The 3- and 5-year OS was 73.2% and 52.9% in the leak group compared to 75.8% and 73.2% in the non-leak group (p = 0.236). CONCLUSIONS GI leak showed no impact on overall and disease free survival after CRS/HIPEC.Avoidance of stapled reconstruction in high risk patients with high tumor burden and large number of anastomoses may yield improved outcomes.
Collapse
|
15
|
Brind'Amour A, Pravong V, Sidéris L, Dubé P, De Guerke L, Fortin S, Auclair MH, Trilling B, Tremblay JF. Rectal anastomosis and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: Should we avoid diverting loop ileostomy? Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:2346-2351. [PMID: 33637373 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Revised: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Literature on rectal anastomosis and diverting ileostomy in patients treated with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is limited. This study assesses the safety of rectal anastomoses during cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and HIPEC, with and without fecal diversion, and its morbidity when performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS From January 2012 to January 2020, patients with peritoneal metastases who underwent CRS and HIPEC that required a rectal anastomosis were included in this single-hospital retrospective chart review. RESULTS 84 patients were included, of which 29 had a diverting loop ileostomy. The rectal anastomotic leak (AL) rate for the series was 8.3%. Factors associated with AL were male gender (p = 0.031) and increased BMI (p < 0.0005). Diverting loop ileostomy was associated with a significant decrease of clinically significant rectal AL (0% vs 12.7%, p = 0.045). However, the 90-day readmission rate was higher in this group (37.9% vs 10.9%, p = 0.003). Stoma reversal surgery was performed for all patients, but 3 patients experienced AL (10.7%). CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that creation of a diverting loop ileostomy may be an effective strategy to prevent symptomatic rectal AL following CRS with HIPEC. However, it is also associated with an increased readmission rate and increased risk of AL following reversal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vera Pravong
- Department of Surgery, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Lucas Sidéris
- Department of Surgery, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Surgery, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Pierre Dubé
- Department of Surgery, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Surgery, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Lara De Guerke
- Department of Surgery, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Suzanne Fortin
- Department of Surgery, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Marie-Hélène Auclair
- Department of Surgery, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Bertrand Trilling
- Department of Surgery, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Surgery, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jean-François Tremblay
- Department of Surgery, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Surgery, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rieser CJ, Hall LB, Kang E, Zureikat AH, Holtzman MP, Pingpank JF, Bartlett DL, Choudry MHA. Predischarge Prediction of Readmission After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Derivation and Validation of a Risk Prediction Score. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:5287-5296. [PMID: 33486643 PMCID: PMC8349345 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09547-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ninety-day hospital readmission rates following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) range from 20 to 40%. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to develop and validate a simple score to predict readmissions following CRS/HIPEC. STUDY DESIGN Using a prospectively maintained database, we retrospectively reviewed clinicopathologic, perioperative, and day-of-discharge data for patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for peritoneal surface malignancies between 2010 and 2018. In-hospital mortalities and discharges to hospice were excluded. Multivariate logistic regression was utilized to identify predictors of unplanned readmission, with three-quarters of the sample randomly selected as the derivation cohort and one-quarter as the validation cohort. Using regression coefficient-based scoring methods, we developed a weighted 7-factor, 10-point predictive score for risk of readmission. RESULTS Overall, 1068 eligible discharges were analyzed; 379 patients were readmitted within 90 days (35.5%). Seven factors were associated with readmission: stoma creation, Peritoneal Cancer Index score ≥ 15, hyponatremia, in-hospital major complication, preoperative chemotherapy, anemia, and discharge to nursing home. In the validation cohort, 25 patients (9.2%) were categorized as high risk for readmission, with a predicted rate of readmission of 69.3% and an observed rate of 76.0%. The score had fair discrimination (area under the curve 0.70) and good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit p-value of 0.77). CONCLUSION Our proposed risk score, easily obtainable on day of discharge, distinguishes patients at high risk for readmission over 90 days following CRS/HIPEC. This score has the potential to target high-risk individuals for intensive follow-up and other interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline J Rieser
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Lauren B Hall
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Eliza Kang
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Matthew P Holtzman
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - James F Pingpank
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David L Bartlett
- AHN Cancer Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - M Haroon A Choudry
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Koch Regional Perfusion Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wiseman JT, Abdel-Misih S, Beal EW, Zaidi MY, Staley CA, Grotz T, Leiting J, Fournier K, Lee AJ, Dineen S, Powers B, Veerapong J, Baumgartner JM, Clarke C, Patel SH, Dhar V, Hendrix RJ, Lambert L, Abbott DE, Pokrzywa C, Raoof M, Eng O, Fackche N, Greer J, Pawlik TM, Cloyd JM. A multi-institutional analysis of Textbook Outcomes among patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal surface malignancies. Surg Oncol 2020; 37:101492. [PMID: 33465587 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Revised: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While recent studies have introduced the composite measure of a textbook outcome (TO) for measuring postoperative outcomes, the incidence of a TO has not been characterized among patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for peritoneal surface malignancies (PSM). STUDY DESIGN All patients who underwent CRS ± hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) between 1999 and 2017 from 12 institutions were included. A TO was defined as the absence of any of the following criteria: completeness of cytoreduction >1, reoperation within 90-days, readmission within 90-days, mortality within 90-days, any grade ≥2 complication, hospital stay >75th percentile, and non-home discharge. RESULTS Among 1904 patients who underwent CRS, only 30.9% achieved a TO while 69.1% failed to achieve a TO most commonly because of postoperative complications. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with achieving a TO were age <65 years (OR: 1.5), albumin ≥3.5 g/dl (OR: 5.7), receipt of HIPEC (OR: 4.5), PCI ≤14 (OR: 2.2), intravenous fluid volume ≤10,000 ml (OR: 2.1), blood loss ≤1000 ml (OR: 4.2) and operative time <7 h (OR: 1.9); while receipt of neoadjuvant therapy (OR: 0.7) and liver resection (OR: 0.4) were associated with not achieving a TO (all p < 0.05). TO was associated with improved overall survival (median 159 months vs 56 months, p < 0.01) even after controlling for confounders on Cox regression (hazard ratio: 2.5, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION Among patients undergoing CRS ± HIPEC for PSM, failure to achieve a TO is common and independently associated with worse overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason T Wiseman
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
| | | | - Eliza W Beal
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | | | - Travis Grotz
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Keith Fournier
- Department of Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew J Lee
- Department of Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sean Dineen
- Department of Surgery, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Benjamin Powers
- Department of Surgery, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jula Veerapong
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Joel M Baumgartner
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Callisia Clarke
- Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Sameer H Patel
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Vikrom Dhar
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Ryan J Hendrix
- Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Laura Lambert
- Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Daniel E Abbott
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Courtney Pokrzywa
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Mustafa Raoof
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Oliver Eng
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Nadege Fackche
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jonathan Greer
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Überrück L, Nadiradze G, Yurttas C, Königsrainer A, Königsrainer I, Horvath P. In-Hospital Mortality and Complication Rates According to Health Insurance Data in Patients Undergoing Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Surface Malignancies in Germany. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:3823-3830. [PMID: 33165722 PMCID: PMC8184558 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09301-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Morbidity and in-hospital mortality rates of patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in Germany are not known. METHODS From 2009 to 2018 all patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in Germany were retrospectively analyzed regarding morbidity and in-hospital mortality rates according to nationwide hospital billing data based on diagnosis-related groups (DRG). The "failure to rescue" (FTR) index, characterizing patients who died after severe but potentially manageable complications, was calculated. RESULTS In total, 8463 patients were included and analyzed. Female sex predominated (1.5:1). Colonic origin of peritoneal metastasis was highest throughout all years, reaching its highest level in 2017 (55%; n = 563) and its lowest level in 2012 (40%; n = 349). Median length of hospital stay reached its maximum in 2017 at 23.9 days and its minimum in 2010 at 22.0 days. Analysis of the total FTR index showed a noticeable improvement over the years, reaching its lowest values in 2017 (9.8%) and 2018 (8.8%). The FTR index for sepsis, peritonitis, and pulmonary complications significantly improved over time. Of the 8463 included patients, 290 died during hospital stay, reflecting an in-hospital mortality rate of 3.4%. CONCLUSION In-hospital mortality after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is reasonably low compared with other surgical procedures. The improvement in the FTR index reflects efforts to centralize treatment at specialized high-volume centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Überrück
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,National Center for Pleura and Peritoneum, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Giorgi Nadiradze
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,National Center for Pleura and Peritoneum, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Can Yurttas
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,National Center for Pleura and Peritoneum, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Alfred Königsrainer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,National Center for Pleura and Peritoneum, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Ingmar Königsrainer
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Feldkirch Academic Teaching Hospital, Feldkirch, Austria
| | - Philipp Horvath
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. .,National Center for Pleura and Peritoneum, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Roife D, Powers BD, Zaidi MY, Staley CA, Cloyd JM, Ahmed A, Grotz T, Leiting J, Fournier K, Lee AJ, Veerapong J, Baumgartner JM, Clarke C, Patel SH, Hendrix RJ, Lambert L, Abbott DE, Pokrzywa C, Lee B, Blakely A, Greer J, Johnston FM, Laskowitz D, Dessureault S, Dineen SP. CRS/HIPEC with Major Organ Resection in Peritoneal Mesothelioma Does not Impact Major Complications or Overall Survival: A Retrospective Cohort Study of the US HIPEC Collaborative. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:4996-5004. [PMID: 33073341 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09232-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION CRS/HIPEC is thought to confer a survival advantage for patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM). However, the impact of nonperitoneal organ resection is not clearly defined. We evaluated the impact of major organ resection (MOR) on postoperative outcomes and overall survival (OS). PATIENTS AND METHODS The US HIPEC collaborative database (2000-2017) was reviewed for MPM patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC. MOR was defined as total or partial resection of diaphragm, stomach, spleen, pancreas, small bowel, colon, rectum, kidney, ureter, bladder, and/or uterus. MOR was categorized as 0, 1, or 2+ organs. RESULTS A total of 174 patients were identified. Median PCI was 16 (3-39). The distribution of patients with MOR-0, MOR-1, and MOR-2+ was 94, 45, and 35 patients, respectively. MOR-1 and MOR-2+ groups had a higher frequency of any complication compared with MOR-0 (57.8%, 74.3%, and 48.9%, respectively, p = 0.035), but Clavien 3/4 complications were similar. Median length of stay was slightly higher in the MOR-1 and MOR-2+ groups (10 and 11 days) compared with the MOR-0 cohort (9 days, p = 0.005). Incomplete cytoreduction, ASA class 4, and male gender were associated with increased mortality on unadjusted analysis; however, their impact on OS was attenuated on multivariable analysis. MOR was not associated with OS based on these data (MOR-1: HR 1.67, 95% CI 0.59-4.74; MOR-2+ : HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.22-2.69). CONCLUSIONS MOR was not associated with an increase in major complications or worse OS in patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for MPM and should be considered, if necessary, to achieve complete cytoreduction for MPM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Roife
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA.,Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, USA
| | - Benjamin D Powers
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA.,Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, USA
| | - Mohammad Y Zaidi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, USA
| | - Charles A Staley
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, USA
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA
| | - Ahmed Ahmed
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA
| | - Travis Grotz
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - Jennifer Leiting
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - Keith Fournier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Andrew J Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Jula Veerapong
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, USA
| | - Joel M Baumgartner
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, USA
| | - Callisia Clarke
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA
| | - Sameer H Patel
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, USA
| | - Ryan J Hendrix
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, USA
| | - Laura Lambert
- Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Daniel E Abbott
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA
| | - Courtney Pokrzywa
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA
| | - Byrne Lee
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, USA
| | - Andrew Blakely
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, USA
| | - Jonathan Greer
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Danielle Laskowitz
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA
| | - Sophie Dessureault
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA.,Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, USA
| | - Sean P Dineen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, USA. .,Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Martin RC, Marshall BM, Philips P, Egger M, McMasters KM, Scoggins CR. Enhanced recovery after surgery is safe for cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Am J Surg 2020; 220:1428-1432. [PMID: 32921403 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.08.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Revised: 07/19/2020] [Accepted: 08/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is an effective, aggressive approach to treating intraperitoneal carcinomatosis. This study aimed to test the efficacy/safety of an enhanced recovery (ERAS) program after CRS-HIPEC surgery. METHODS Review of an IRB-approved prospectively maintained HIPEC database from 2003 to 2019. Adverse events and outcomes related to the primary operation were noted. RESULTS 125 HIPEC procedures performed met inclusion criteria, with 20 treated through ERAS. There was an improvement in LOS (ERAS: 9, 6.0-28.0; non-ERAS: 11.0, 6.0-45.1, P = 0.5), a significant reduction in opioid use during hospitalization (ERAS Total Morphine Equivalents 156 vs Non-ERAS of 856, p < 0.001), and a significant reduction in discharge opioid requirements (ERAS 55% of patients, non-ERAS 97%, p < 0.02). CONCLUSION ERAS for CRS-HIPEC is safe, while maintaining quality outcomes, and leads to significant reductions in hospital opioid use and discharge narcotic usage. Our experience supports the full implementation of an ERAS protocol for HIPEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Cg Martin
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, USA.
| | - Bryce M Marshall
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, USA
| | - Prejesh Philips
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, USA
| | - Michael Egger
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, USA
| | - Kelly M McMasters
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, USA
| | - Charles R Scoggins
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Tan G, Wong J. Surgical management and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for locally advanced colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 11:508-512. [PMID: 32655929 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2019.12.10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Locally advanced colorectal cancers (CRC) pose several management challenges, including local recurrence and the development of peritoneal metastases (PM). These recurrences are associated with a poor prognosis and onerous complications. In selected patients with PM, cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) have shown to confer survival benefit. However, its effectiveness depends on the disease extent and this combined treatment is associated with significant morbidity. Additionally, early detection of PM is difficult even with state-of-the-art imaging techniques. Due to the high-risk of developing PM, locally advanced CRC are currently being investigated in several trials, including adjuvant HIPEC in an attempt to reduce the risk of PM. This review article sets out to examine the current data available on this topic, in an attempt to determine the suitability and effectiveness of HIPEC in the management of locally advanced CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace Tan
- Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery & Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore and Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jolene Wong
- Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery & Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore and Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Schwartz PB, Stahl CC, Vande Walle KA, Pokrzywa CJ, Cherney Stafford LM, Aiken T, Barrett J, Acher AW, Leverson G, Ronnekleiv-Kelly S, Weber SM, Abbott DE. What Drives High Costs of Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC: Patient, Provider or Tumor? Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:4920-4928. [PMID: 32415351 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08583-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is utilized for peritoneal malignancies and is associated with significant resource use. To address potentially modifiable factors contributing to excessive cost, we sought to determine predictors of high cost of care for patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC. METHODS An institutional CRS/HIPEC database was queried for adult patients from 2014 to 2018. Cost was defined as cost for the index hospitalization, and high-cost cases were defined as > 75th percentile for cost. Bivariate analyses for cost were performed, and all significant tumor, patient, and surgeon-specific variables were entered in a linear regression for cost. A separate linear regression was performed for length of stay (LOS). RESULTS In total, 59 patients underwent 61 CRS/HIPEC procedures. The median direct variable cost was $20,509 (16,395-25,240). Median length of stay (LOS) was 8 (7-11.5) days and ICU stay was 1 (1-1.5) day. LOS, length of ICU stay and operative time were predictive of cost. Factors associated with increased LOS were Clavien-Dindo grade II complications and ostomy creation. Patient-related factors, including age and BMI, tumor-related factors, such as PCI and CCR, and surgeon were not predictive of cost nor LOS. DISCUSSION Our results, the first to identify predictors of high cost of CRS/HIPEC-related care in the US, reveal cost was largely related to length and intensity of care. In turn, these drivers were influenced by complications and operative factors. Future work will focus on identifying an appropriate ERAS protocol following CRS/HIPEC and selection of those patients that may avoid routine ICU admission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick B Schwartz
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Christopher C Stahl
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Kara A Vande Walle
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Courtney J Pokrzywa
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Linda M Cherney Stafford
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Taylor Aiken
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - James Barrett
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Alexandra W Acher
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Glen Leverson
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Sean Ronnekleiv-Kelly
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Sharon M Weber
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Daniel E Abbott
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Chen JC, Beal EW, Hays J, Pawlik TM, Abdel-Misih S, Cloyd JM. Outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before CRS-HIPEC for patients with appendiceal cancer. J Surg Oncol 2020; 122:388-398. [PMID: 32383206 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Revised: 04/07/2020] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is indicated for patients with peritoneal dissemination of appendiceal cancer. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) before CRS-HIPEC remains controversial. METHODS A retrospective review of adult patients who underwent CRS ± HIPEC for metastatic appendiceal cancer between 2000-2017 was performed. Patients who received NAC followed by surgery were compared with those who underwent surgery first (SF) with and without 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS Among 803 patients with appendiceal cancer who underwent CRS ± HIPEC, 225 (28%) received NAC, and 578 (72%) underwent SF. After PSM (n = 186), median overall survival (OS) did not differ (NAC: 40 vs SF: 56 months; P = .210) but recurrence-free survival (RFS) was worse among patients who received NAC (14 vs 22 months; P = .007). NAC was independently associated with worse OS (hazards ratio [HR], 1.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-3.18) and RFS (HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.25-2.99). CONCLUSION In this multi-institutional retrospective analysis of patients with peritoneal dissemination from appendiceal cancer, the use of NAC before CRS-HIPEC was associated with worse OS and RFS even after PSM and multivariable regression. Immediate surgery should be considered for patients with disease amenable to complete cytoreduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C Chen
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Eliza W Beal
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - John Hays
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Sherif Abdel-Misih
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Turgeon MK, Gamboa AC, Lee RM, Zaidi MY, Kimbrough C, Grotz T, Fournier K, Powers B, Dineen S, Veerapong J, Clarke C, Mogal H, Patel SH, Lambert L, Ronnekleiv-Kelly S, Raoof M, Fackche N, Greer JB, Staley CA, Cloyd JM, Maithel SK, Winer JH. The Intersection of Age and Tumor Biology with Postoperative Outcomes in Patients After Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:4894-4907. [PMID: 32378087 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08538-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient age is a significant factor in preoperative selection for major abdominal surgery. The association of age, tumor biology, and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) remains ill-defined. METHODS Retrospective analysis was performed for patients who underwent a CCR0/1 CRS/HIPEC from the US HIPEC Collaborative Database (2000-2017). Age was categorized into < 65 or ≥ 65 years. Primary outcome was postoperative major complications. Secondary outcomes were non-home discharge (NHD) and readmission. Analysis was stratified by disease histology: non-invasive (appendiceal LAMN/HAMN), and invasive (appendiceal/colorectal adenocarcinoma). RESULTS Of 1090 patients identified, 22% were ≥ 65 (n = 240), 59% were female (n = 646), 25% had non-invasive (n = 276) and 51% had invasive (n = 555) histology. Median PCI was 13 (IQR 7-20). Patients ≥ 65 had a higher rate of major complications (37 vs 26%, p = 0.02), NHD (12 vs 5%, p < 0.01), and readmission (28 vs 22%, p = 0.05), compared to those < 65. For non-invasive histology, age ≥ 65 was not associated with major complications or NHD on multivariable analysis. For invasive histology, when accounting for PCI and CCR, age ≥ 65 was associated with major complications (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.16-3.59, p = 0.01). When accounting for major complications, age ≥ 65 was associated with NHD (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.08-5.98, p = 0.03). Age ≥ 65 was not predictive of readmission for any histology when accounting for major complications. CONCLUSIONS Age ≥ 65 years is an independent predictor for postoperative major complications and non-home discharge for invasive histology, but not non-invasive histology. These data inform preoperative counseling, risk stratification, and early discharge planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael K Turgeon
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Adriana C Gamboa
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Rachel M Lee
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Mohammad Y Zaidi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Charles Kimbrough
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Travis Grotz
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Keith Fournier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Benjamin Powers
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.,Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Sean Dineen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.,Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jula Veerapong
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Callisia Clarke
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Harveshp Mogal
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Sameer H Patel
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Laura Lambert
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Sean Ronnekleiv-Kelly
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Mustafa Raoof
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Nadege Fackche
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jonathan B Greer
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Charles A Staley
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Shishir K Maithel
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Joshua H Winer
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Powers BD, Dineen SP. ASO Author Reflections: To Redo or Not to Redo, That is the Question: Assessing the Slings and Arrows of Repeat CRS/HIPEC in Patients with Recurrent or Progressive Peritoneal Carcinomatosis. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:4892-4893. [PMID: 32318947 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08491-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin D Powers
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.,Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.,Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Sean P Dineen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA. .,Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Powers BD, Felder S, Veerapong J, Baumgartner JM, Clarke C, Mogal H, Staley CA, Maithel SK, Patel S, Dhar V, Lambert L, Hendrix RJ, Abbott DE, Pokrzywa C, Raoof M, Lee B, Johnston FM, Greer J, Cloyd JM, Kimbrough C, Grotz T, Leiting J, Fournier K, Lee AJ, Imanirad I, Dessureault S, Dineen SP. Repeat Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Is Not Associated with Prohibitive Complications: Results of a Multiinstitutional Retrospective Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:4883-4891. [PMID: 32318945 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08482-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is offered to select patients with peritoneal metastases. In instances of recurrence/progression, a repeat CRS/HIPEC may be considered. The perioperative morbidity and the potential oncologic benefits are not well described. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of a multiinstitutional database to assess the perioperative outcomes following repeat CRS/HIPEC (repeat). Kaplan-Meier and Cox estimates were used to assess survival. RESULTS In the entire cohort, 2157 patients were analyzed, with 158 (7.3%) in the repeat cohort. The rate of complete cytoreduction was 89.8% versus 83.0% in initial versus repeat groups. The overall incidence of major complications was similar (26.3% vs. 30.7%); however, reoperation was more common in the repeat group. Perioperative outcomes such as length of stay and nonhome discharge were not significantly different. For the entire cohort, 5-year overall survival (OS) was 56.0% in the initial group and 59.5% in the repeat group. In patients with only appendiceal cancer, we observed a 5-year OS of 64.0% in the initial group compared with 67.3% in the repeat cohort. For patients with appendiceal cancer who developed a recurrence/progression, median OS was 36 months in the no repeat operation group compared with 73 months for those that did. Multivariable regression demonstrated that completeness of cytoreduction and tumor grade were associated with OS, but repeat operation was not. CONCLUSIONS Repeat CRS/HIPEC is not associated with prohibitive risk. Survival is possibly improved, and therefore, repeat operation should be considered in selected patients with recurrent or progressive disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin D Powers
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.,Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Seth Felder
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.,Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jula Veerapong
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Joel M Baumgartner
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Callisia Clarke
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Harveshp Mogal
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Charles A Staley
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Shishir K Maithel
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sameer Patel
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Vikrom Dhar
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Laura Lambert
- Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Ryan J Hendrix
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Daniel E Abbott
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Courtney Pokrzywa
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Mustafa Raoof
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Byrne Lee
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | | | - Jonathan Greer
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Charles Kimbrough
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Travis Grotz
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jennifer Leiting
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Keith Fournier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew J Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Iman Imanirad
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.,Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Sophie Dessureault
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.,Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Sean P Dineen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA. .,Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|