Association of Textbook Outcome and Hospital Volume with Long-Term Survival Following Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: What Matters More?

Use of textbook outcome as a quality metric in hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Textbook outcomes (TOs) represent the optimal course after surgery. To date, no meta-analysis has assessed the pooled TOs of patients undergoing hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgery and the effect of TO achievement on patient outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess TO achievement across different studies and to characterize the effect of TO achievement on patient-related outcomes, including disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched (1990-2024). The criteria used to define TO and the median overall TO in HPB surgery were obtained. In addition, a random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to assess the effect of TO achievement on 5-year OS and DFS.

RESULTS

A total of 27 studies involving 517,304 patients met inclusion criteria. The main criteria used to define TO included absence of readmission and mortality within 30 days after discharge, severe postoperative complications, prolonged hospital stay, and negative surgical margin (R0). Of note, the main factors related to TO achievement were younger patient age and lower American Society of Anesthesiologists score. Overall, the median rates of TOs achieved across procedures were 62.0% (IQR, 48.0%-69.0%) for hepatic procedure, 54.0% (IQR, 41.0%-68.0%) for biliary procedure, 46.0% (IQR, 42.0%-46.5%) for combined hepatopancreatic procedure, 45.0% (IQR, 30.5%-59.0%) for pancreatic procedure, 33.0% (IQR, 32.2%-34.0%) for liver transplantation, and 19.5% (IQR, 16.8%-22.3%) for combined hepatobiliary procedure. TO achievement was associated with improved odds of 5-year OS (odds ratio [OR], 1.22 [95% CI, 1.20-1.24]) and 5-year DFS (OR, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.16-1.37]).

CONCLUSION

Overall, hepatic and biliary operations had the highest TO achievement, followed by pancreatic procedures. In contrast, hepatobiliary surgery and liver transplantation had the lowest TO. There was a significant discrepancy in the definition of TO across different studies, highlighting the need for consensus on the definition of TO.

Perioperative Benzodiazepine Exposure Impacts Risk of New Persistent Benzodiazepine Use Among Patients with Cancer

BACKGROUND

Benzodiazepines are the third most misused medication, with many patients having their first exposure during a surgical episode. We sought to characterize factors associated with new persistent benzodiazepine use (NPBU) among patients undergoing cancer surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent cancer surgery between 2013 and 2021 were identified using the IBM-MarketScan database. NPBU was defined as one prescription filled during the 90-180 days period after surgery by patients who were previously benzodiazepine naïve. The association of variables with perioperative benzodiazepine use and NPBU was assessed using multivariable regression.

RESULTS

Among 34,637 patients with cancer (breast: n = 5460, 15.8%; lung: n = 3479, 10.0%; esophagus: n = 384, 1.1%; gastric: n = 852, 2.5%; liver: n =502, 1.4%; biliary: n = 268, 0.8%; pancreas: n = 1290, 3.7%; colon: n = 10,838, 31.3%; rectum: n = 2566, 7.4%; prostate: n = 8998, 26.0%), most were male (n = 19,687, 56.8%) with a median age of 57 years (IQR 51-61 years). Overall, 8.8% of patients had perioperative benzodiazepine use and 7.5% of patients developed NPBU following surgery. On multivariable analyses, perioperative benzodiazepine exposure (ref. no perioperative exposure: OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.68-2.38) and higher perioperative dose of > 32.0 lorazepam milligram equivalents (LME) (ref. < 10 LME: OR 2.42, 95% CI 2.01-2.92) were independently associated with higher odds of NPBU. Notably, male patients had lower odds of NPBU versus female patients (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68-0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Roughly 1 in 13 commercially insured patients developed NPBU following surgery for cancer. Judicious use of benzodiazepines among patients with high risk of misuse can mitigate NPBU to help avoid benzodiazepine-related complications such as overdose or accidental deaths.

A Composite Endpoint of Liver Surgery (CELS): Development and Validation of a Clinically Relevant Endpoint Requiring a Smaller Sample Size

BACKGROUND

The feasibility of trials in liver surgery using a single-component clinical endpoint is low because single endpoints require large samples due to their low incidence. The current study sought to develop and validate a novel composite endpoint of liver surgery (CELS) to facilitate the generation of more feasible and robust high-level evidence in the field of liver surgery.

METHODS

Patients who underwent curative-intent hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, or colorectal liver metastasis were identified using a multi-institutional database. Components of CELS were selected based on perioperative liver surgery-specific complications using univariable logistic regression models. The association of CELS with prolonged length of stay (LOS) and surgery-related death was evaluated and externally validated. Sample sizes were calculated for both individual outcomes and CELS.

RESULTS

Among 1958 patients, 377 (19.3%) met CELS criteria based on postoperative bile leak (n = 221, 11.3%), post-hepatectomy liver failure (n = 71, 3.6%), post-hepatectomy hemorrhage (n = 38, 1.9%), or intraoperative blood loss of 2000 ml or greater (n = 101, 5.2%). CELS demonstrated favorable discriminative accuracy of surgery-related death (analytic cohort: area under the curve [AUC], 0.79 vs external validation cohort: AUC, 0.85). In addition LOS was longer among the patients with a positive CELS (analytic cohort: 14 vs. 9 days [p < 0.001] vs. the validation cohort: 10 vs. 6 days [p < 0.001]). Relative to individual endpoints, CELS allowed a 45.8-91.6% reduction in sample size.

CONCLUSION

CELS effectively predicted surgery-related death and can be used as a standardized, clinically relevant endpoint in prospective trials, facilitating smaller sample sizes and enhancing feasibility compared with single quality outcome metrics.

Impact of Academic Medical Centers on Surgical Outcomes of Neighboring Nonacademic Medical Centers

BACKGROUND

We aimed to investigate the geographic variation of academic medical centers (AMCs) across different healthcare markets and the impact on surgical outcomes in nearby non-AMCs.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients who underwent major surgery between 2016 and 2021 were identified from the Medicare Standard Analytic Files. Healthcare markets were delineated using Dartmouth Atlas hospital referral regions. Multivariable regression was used to examine the association between the presence of market-level AMCs and surgical outcomes in neighboring non-AMCs.

RESULTS

A total of 388,431 Medicare beneficiaries underwent major surgery (coronary artery bypass grafting: 97,346, 25.1%; abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: 67,000, 17.3%; pneumonectomy: 30,500, 7.9%; pancreatectomy: 5,341, 1.4%; colectomy: 188,244, 48.5%) at 2,757 non-AMCs. Median age was 74 years (interquartile range 70 to 80 years), and roughly one-half of patients were men (215,569, 55.5%). Notably, 43.1% of individuals underwent surgery in markets with low AMC presence, 48.0% in markets with moderate AMC presence, and 8.9% in markets with high AMC presence. On multivariable analysis, compared with low AMC markets, high AMC presence was associated with decreased risk of extended length of stay (-1.51%, 95% CI -2.03 to -1.00; p < 0.001), postoperative complications (-1.20%, 95% CI -1.76 to -0.65; p < 0.001), 90-day readmission (-2.39%, 95% CI -2.90 to -1.88; p < 0.001), and mortality (-0.64% 95% CI -0.98 to -0.30; p < 0.001). Additionally, high AMC market presence was associated with a 2.93% (-2.93%, 95% CI -3.17 to -2.68; p < 0.001) decrease in expenditures for the index surgical procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

High market presence of AMCs was associated with lower morbidity and mortality rates at nearby non-AMCs. The influence of AMCs on clinical outcomes likely extends beyond direct patient care, indicating spillover effects of AMCs on outcomes for patients in neighboring non-AMCs.

Association of mental health assessment with postoperative outcomes following major surgery in older individuals

INTRODUCTION

Individuals with mental illness are at risk for poor surgical outcomes. Notably, the impact of preoperative assessment and optimization for high-risk surgical procedures remains a relatively understudied and evolving field. We sought to investigate the association between mental health assessment and postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

Older patients with an active mental illness who underwent major surgery between 2016 and 2021 were identified using the Medicare database. Mental health assessment was defined as any encounter with a mental health professional or a claim involving a mental health Current Procedural Terminology code. Major surgery included coronary artery bypass grafting, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, pneumonectomy, pancreatectomy, and colectomy. Multivariable regression was utilized to examine the association between mental health assessment and textbook outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 32,543 Medicare beneficiaries underwent a major surgical procedure. The most common mental illness was anxiety (n = 11,836; 36.4%), followed by depression (n = 11,258; 34.6%) and psychosis (n = 1,924; 5.9%). Notably, 1,494 individuals (4.6%) had at least 1 mental health assessment within the 6 months preceding the index surgery. Patients who had mental health assessment were more likely to achieve a textbook outcome (no mental health assessment: 38.1% vs mental health assessment: 44.6%; P < .001). In particular, patients who had mental health assessment were less likely to experience complications (no mental health assessment: 38.7% vs mental health assessment: 31.8%), have an extended length of stay (no mental health assessment: 28.5% vs mental health assessment: 22.7%), 90-day mortality (no mental health assessment: 8.1% vs mental health assessment: 6.4%), and 90-day readmission (no mental health assessment: 33.6% vs mental health assessment: 25.8%) (all P < .001). On multivariable analysis, mental health assessment remained independently associated with higher odds of achieving a textbook outcome (odds ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.39; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Among older individuals with a mental illness who underwent a major surgical procedure, mental health assessment was associated with 25% increased odds of a postoperative textbook outcome. Preoperative care coordination among mental health professionals and surgical care teams is critical to achieve optimal patient outcomes.

Textbook outcome in liver surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: defining predictors of an optimal postoperative course using machine learning

BACKGROUND

We sought to define textbook outcome in liver surgery (TOLS) for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) by considering the implications of perioperative outcomes on overall survival (OS).

METHODS

Using a multi-institutional database, TOLS for ICC was defined by employing novel machine learning (ML) models to identify perioperative factors most strongly predictive of OS ≥ 12 months. Subsequently, clinicopathologic factors associated with achieving TOLS were investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 1556 patients with ICC were included. The ML classification models demonstrated that the absence of post-hepatectomy liver failure, intraoperative blood loss <750 mL, absence of major infectious complications, and R0 resection were the perioperative outcomes associated with prolonged OS, thereby defining TOLS for ICC. On multivariable analysis, older age, ASA class >2, lymph node metastasis, receipt of neoadjuvant therapy, advanced T status, poor histological grade and microvascular invasion were independently associated with lower odds of achieving TOLS (all p-values<0.05). Overall, 60.2 % (n = 936) of the patients achieved TOLS, demonstrating markedly improved OS and recurrence-free survival (RFS) than individuals who did not (both p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

A standardized definition of TOLS for ICC was established that may be used to evaluate hospital performance at the patient level and help optimize surgical outcomes for patients with ICC.

Cure after surgery for hepato-pancreato-biliary cancers: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing curative-intent surgery for hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) malignancies may achieve statistical cure i.e., a mortality risk which aligns with the general population.

AIMS

To summarize the results of different cure models in HPB malignancies.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search and selected studies on curative-intent surgery (hepatic resection, HR, or liver transplantation, LT) for HPB malignancies including a cure model in their analysis. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024528694).

RESULTS

Eleven studies reporting a cure model after HPB surgery for malignancy were included: 6 on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) two on biliary tract cancers (BTC), one on pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET), one on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and one on colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). In terms of OS, the cure fraction of HCC is 63.4 %-75.8 % with LT and 31.8 %-40.5 % with HR, achieved within 7.2-10 years and 7-14.4 years respectively. The cure fraction of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is 9.7 % in terms of DFS, but largely depends on tumor stage. PDAC and pNET display a cure fraction of 20.4 % and 57.1 % respectively in terms of DFS, confirming the impact of histotype on DFS.

CONCLUSION

Statistical cure for hepato-pancreato-biliary cancers can be achieved with surgery. The probability of cure depends on the interplay between tumor stage and aggressiveness, effectiveness of the surgical treatment and persistence of chronic conditions after surgery.

Realizing Textbook Outcomes Following Liver Resection for Hepatic Neoplasms with Development and Validation of a Predictive Nomogram

BACKGROUND

'Textbook Outcome' (TO) represents an effort to define a standardized, composite quality benchmark based on intraoperative and postoperative endpoints. This study aimed to assess the applicability of TO as an outcome measure following liver resection for hepatic neoplasms from a low- to middle-income economy and determine its impact on long-term survival. Based on identified perioperative predictors, we developed and validated a nomogram-based scoring and risk stratification system.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing curative resections for hepatic neoplasms between 2012 and 2023. Rates of TO were assessed over time and factors associated with achieving a TO were evaluated. Using stepwise regression, a prediction nomogram for achieving TO was established based on perioperative risk factors.

RESULTS

Of the 1018 consecutive patients who underwent liver resections, a TO was achieved in 64.9% (661/1018). The factor most responsible for not achieving TO was significant post-hepatectomy liver failure (22%). Realization of TO was independently associated with improved overall and disease-free survival. On logistic regression, American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 2 (p = 0.0002), perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (p = 0.011), major hepatectomy (p = 0.0006), blood loss >1500 mL (p = 0.007), and presence of lymphovascular emboli on pathology (p = 0.026) were associated with the non-realization of TO. These independent risk factors were integrated into a nomogram prediction model with the predictive efficiency for TO (area under the curve 75.21%, 95% confidence interval 70.69-79.72%).

CONCLUSION

TO is a realizable outcome measure and should be adopted. We recommend the use of the nomogram proposed as a convenient tool for patient selection and prognosticating outcomes following hepatectomy.

Association of Hospital Volume With Quality Care Outcomes Following Minor and Major Hepatectomy for Primary Liver Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Regionalizing hepatic resections to high-volume hospitals (HVH) has improved outcomes, yet widened disparities in access. We sought to evaluate the association of hospital volume with quality care outcomes and overall survival (OS) between minor and major hepatectomy for primary liver cancer.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database identified patients with primary liver cancer who underwent minor/major hepatectomy (2009-2019). HVHs were defined by the top quartile in annual case volume (vs. the bottom three quartiles). Quality care outcomes (time to resection, margin status, length of stay, 30-day readmission, 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality) and OS were assessed using multivariable regression.

RESULTS

Overall, 6,988 patients underwent minor hepatectomy and 4880 major hepatectomy. No differences in quality care outcomes or OS based on hospital volume for minor hepatectomy were observed (all p > 0.05). Treatment at HVHs for major hepatectomy was associated with decreased odds of 30-day and 90-day mortality events (all p < 0.05). Median OS was 40.2 months [IQR 21.7-66.6] at HVHs versus 33.5 [IQR 17.0-58.7] at low-volume hospitals which remained independently predictive of improved OS on multivariable analysis (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.93).

CONCLUSION

These results support regionalization to HVHs for major hepatectomy; however, minor hepatectomy can be safely performed at hospitals regardless of volume.

The Role of a Community Surgeon in the Care of Hepatopancreatobiliary Patients: Short-Term Outcomes and Learning Curve

Background Owing to the well-established volume-outcome relationship, hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgery is commonly regionalized to academic, teaching hospitals. However, regionalization is associated with decreased access for some populations in need, as well as geographic and financial barriers for patients. If high surgeon and institutional volumes can be achieved, the community, non-teaching HPB surgical practice could help alleviate some issues associated with regionalization. The HPB experience of a community surgeon immediately after surgical oncology training was reviewed, hypothesizing that high volumes with acceptable short-term outcomes could be achieved, although a learning curve may be observed. Materials and methods Electronic medical records from 2013 to 2023 were reviewed. Data included patient demographics, perioperative details, pathology, complications, and deaths over 90 postoperative days. Perioperative quality metrics were assessed for trends over time in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and liver resection subgroups. Results A total of 295 patients underwent 176 (59.7%) pancreatic and 119 (40.3%) hepatobiliary operations. The most common operations were PD (n=87; 49.4%) and partial hepatic lobectomy (n=56; 41.1%). In the pancreas group, morbidity was 25% (n=44), and mortality was 4.5% (n=8). In the hepatobiliary group, morbidity and mortality were 19.3% (n=23) and 5.0% (n=6), respectively. Within the PD and liver resection subgroups, operative time, estimated blood loss, and hospital length of stay (LOS) trended downward over time, with LOS decreasing significantly. Conclusion High HPB volumes with acceptable short-term outcomes can be achieved by a solo practitioner in the community, non-teaching setting. For PDs and liver resections, perioperative metrics trended downward over time, illustrating the learning curve encountered after training.

Utilization and survival outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage gastric cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Given increased utilization of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for gastric adenocarcinoma, practice patterns deviating from standard of care (upfront resection) remain unknown. We sought to identify factors associated with NAT use and survival outcomes among early-stage gastric cancers.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database identified patients with early-stage (T1N0M0) gastric cancer (2010-2020). Multivariable logistic regression assessed characteristics associated with NAT utilization compared to upfront surgery. After 1:1 propensity score matching, Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression assessed overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Of 6452 patients with early-stage gastric cancer, 626 (9.7%) received NAT. Patients who received NAT were more likely treated at community hospitals, had moderate to poorly differentiated disease, and tumors located in the cardia (all p < 0.05). After propensity score matching, 1,248 patients remained. Median OS for NAT was 37.1 months (IQR 20.2-64.0) versus 45.6 months (IQR 22.5-72.8) for resection (p < 0.001). Treatment with NAT remained independently predictive of worse OS on Cox regression (hazard ratio 1.19; 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.34).

CONCLUSIONS

Although patients who received NAT had more aggressive prognostic features, NAT was associated with worse OS despite accounting for this selection bias. These results highlight the importance of adhering to guidelines, regardless of differing disease characteristics, which has significant implications on outcomes.

Association of preoperative cholangitis with outcomes and expenditures among patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to characterize the association of preoperative acute cholangitis (PAC) with surgical outcomes and healthcare costs.

METHODS

Patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) between 2013 and 2021 were identified using 100% Medicare Standard Analytic Files. PAC was defined as the occurrence of at least 1 episode of acute cholangitis within the year preceding surgery. Multivariable regression analyses were used to compare postoperative outcomes and costs relative to PAC.

RESULTS

Among 23,455 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent PD, 2,217 patients (9.5%) had at least 1 episode of PAC. Most patients (n = 14,729 [62.8%]) underwent PD for a malignant indication. On multivariable analyses, PAC was associated with elevated odds of surgical site infection (odds ratio [OR], 1.14; 95% CI, 1.01-1.29), sepsis (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.01-1.37), extended length of stay (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.01-1.26), and readmission within 90 days (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.04-1.26). Patients with a history of PAC before PD had a reduced likelihood of achieving a postoperative textbook outcome (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.75-0.92) along with 87.8% and 18.4% higher associated preoperative and postoperative healthcare costs, respectively (all P < .001). Overall costs increased substantially among patients with more than 1 PAC episode ($59,893 [95% CI, $57,827-$61,959] for no episode vs $77,922 [95% CI, $73,854-$81,990] for 1 episode vs $101,205 [95% CI, $94,871-$107,539] for multiple episodes).

CONCLUSION

Approximately 1 in 10 patients undergoing PD experienced an antecedent PAC episode, which was associated with adverse surgical outcomes and greater healthcare expenditures.

Association of county-level food deserts and food swamps on postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing colorectal surgery

BACKGROUND

Although malnutrition has been linked to worse healthcare outcomes, the broader context of food environments has not been examined relative to surgical outcomes. We sought to define the impact of food environment on postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing resection for colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgery for CRC between 2014 and 2020 were identified from the Medicare database. Patient-level data were linked to the United States Department of Agriculture data on food environment. Multivariable regression was used to examine the association between food environment and the likelihood of achieving a textbook outcome (TO). TO was defined as the absence of an extended length of stay (≥75th percentile), postoperative complications, readmission, and mortality within 90 days.

RESULTS

A total of 260,813 patients from 3017 counties were included in the study. Patients from unhealthy food environments were more likely to be Black, have a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, and reside in areas with higher social vulnerability (all P < .01). Patients residing in unhealthy food environments were less likely to achieve a TO than that of patients residing in the healthiest food environments (food swamp: 48.8% vs 52.4%; food desert: 47.9% vs 53.7%; P < .05). On multivariable analysis, individuals residing in the unhealthy food environments had lower odds of achieving a TO than those of patients living in the healthiest food environments (food swamp: OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.83-0.90; food desert: OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.76-0.82); P < .05).

CONCLUSION

The surrounding food environment of patients may serve as a modifiable sociodemographic risk factor that contributes to disparities in postoperative CRC outcomes.

Achieving Textbook Outcomes in Colorectal Cancer Surgery Is Associated with Improved Long-Term Survival: Results of the Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study

Background: The outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer greatly depend on the quality of their surgical care. However, relying solely on a single quality indicator does not adequately capture the multifaceted nature of modern perioperative care. A new tool-"Textbook Outcome" (TO)-has been suggested to provide a comprehensive evaluation of surgical quality. This study aims to examine how TO affects the long-term outcomes of colorectal cancer patients who are scheduled for surgery. Methods: The data of all patients undergoing elective colorectal cancer resection with primary anastomosis at two major cancer treatment centers in Lithuania-Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos and National Cancer Institute-between 2014 and 2018 were entered into the prospectively maintained database. The study defined TO as a composite quality indicator that incorporated seven parameters: R0 resection, retrieval of ≥12 lymph nodes, absence of postoperative complications during the intrahospital period, hospital stay duration of fewer than 14 days, no readmission within 90 days after surgery, no reinterventions within 30 days after surgery, and no 30-day mortality. Long-term outcomes between patients who achieved TO and those who did not were compared. Factors associated with failure to achieve TO were identified. Results: Of the 1524 patients included in the study, TO was achieved by 795 (52.2%). Patients with a higher ASA score (III-IV) were identified to have higher odds of failure to achieve TO (OR 1.497, 95% CI 1.203-1.863), while those who underwent minimally invasive surgery had lower odds for similar failure (OR 0.570, 95% CI 0.460-0.706). TO resulted in improved 5-year overall-(80.2% vs. 65.5%, p = 0.001) and disease-free survival (76.6% vs. 62.6%; p = 0.001) rates. Conclusions: Elective colorectal resections result in successful TO for 52.5% of patients. The likelihood of failure to achieve TO is increased in patients with a high ASA score, while minimally invasive surgery is associated with higher TO rates. Patients who fail to achieve successful surgical outcomes experience reduced long-term outcomes.