Sex, race, and consideration of bariatric surgery among primary care patients with moderate to severe obesity

Perceptions and Beliefs About Obesity and Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Among Black and White Men

BACKGROUND

Although metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is a safe and effective procedure to reduce severe obesity and is covered by most health insurance plans, utilization of MBS is significantly lower among men compared to women. This study identifies unique factors that explain men's attitude towards MBS.

METHODS

The study survey (paper/online) included 129 Black and White men with severe obesity from metropolitan communities in Western New York. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate participants' personal and community factors influencing their consideration of MBS.

RESULTS

Men willing to undergo MBS had lower education (38% vs. 21% ≤ high school, p < 0.05), were less likely to be satisfied with their body weight (27% vs. 48%, p < 0.05), more likely to have a physician supporting their weight loss efforts (55% vs. 32%, p = 0.03) and discussing MBS treatment (39% vs. 19%, p = 0.02), believed that community role models who underwent MBS "lost weight and looked great" (66% vs. 40%, p = 0.02) and that MBS was safe and effective (40% vs. 13%, p < 0.01), compared to men unwilling to undergo MBS. When adjusted for education level, dissatisfaction with body size (odds ratio, OR = 4.56, 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.16, 18.01) and physician support (OR = 3.71, 95% CI: 1.17, 11.78) remained significantly associated with men's willingness to undergo MBS. Race and BMI were not associated with willingness to undergo MBS.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive attitude toward MBS among men is influenced by self-perception of excess weight, strong physician support and community role models. Improving patient-provider communication about MBS and awareness from community role models may improve MBS utilization among men.

The Impact of Bias and Stigma on Patient Referral for Metabolic/Bariatric Surgery: An Algerian Experience

Obesity is a chronic disease causing a major public health challenge, particularly in Algeria, yet in patient referrals for metabolic/bariatric surgery (MBS), the most effective treatment remain low. This study aims to analyze the factors influencing referrals for MBS, focusing on the impact of obesity bias and stigma among primary care physicians. A survey questionnaire was sent electronically to 250 physicians across four regions in Algeria. The questionnaire evaluated their knowledge, attitudes, perceptions, and practices regarding MBS including questions on indications for MBS, operative techniques, physicians' attitudes toward patients with obesity, and factors influencing patient referrals for MBS. Survey response rate was 37.2% (93/250 physicians), most physicians (89%) recognized obesity as a chronic disease, and majority (60%) of physicians were aware that hunger regulation centers are involuntary and located in the hypothalamus; 34.4% believed that lifestyle changes were sufficient to treat severe obesity. Significant knowledge gaps were observed regarding MBS indications, 83% expressed a willingness to help their patients achieve ideal weight, but only 10% of physicians referred patients for MBS. Many physicians showed negative attitudes toward patients with obesity, and 68% held stereotypes about obesity, attributing it to a lack of personal willpower. These stigmas may have contributed to the low referral rates for MBS. Additional barriers were economic barriers, such as the high cost of MBS and limited or absent insurance coverage. A lack of knowledge about metabolic/bariatric surgery, coupled with stigmatizing attitudes and economic constraints, hinders patient referrals for MBS, which is the most effective treatment for severe obesity. The study highlights the need for more education of primary care physicians, promoting an empathetic and interprofessional approach and implementing health policies that improve financial accessibility to MBS in Algeria.

Retrospective Cohort Study of Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Patients: Procedure Use and Racial Disparity

BACKGROUND

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) are common bariatric procedures, with GERD being a frequent obesity-associated disease among individuals undergoing these surgeries. RYGB is recommended for patients with GERD due to the increased control of GERD symptoms. This study examines RYGB and SG use in this population and factors influencing procedure choice.

METHODS

This study analyzed 2016-2022 data from the MBSAQIP database comprising patients with GERD who underwent SG or RYGB. Statistical analysis included univariate and multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with procedure receipt.

RESULTS

RYGB rates are rising annually but remain lower than SG for GERD. Compared to White individuals, Hispanics are 14% less likely, and African Americans are 19% less likely, to receive RYGB.

CONCLUSIONS

The study notes a research gap in choosing RYGB or SG for patients with GERD, despite consensus favoring RYGB. It highlights a disparity between recommendations and practice, with GERD predicting the use of RYGB but SG being more prevalent in this population overall. The analysis links race to procedure choice, showing African American and Hispanic patients are less likely to undergo RYGB, indicating potential disparities in access and decision-making.

Disparities in Bariatric Surgery Outcomes: A Regional Analysis

PURPOSE

The success of metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is impacted by significant pre-surgical attrition rates and poor postoperative follow-up. This study focused on geographic variations in attrition rates and surgical outcomes for MBS practice for which the patient population is drawn from nine Chicago neighborhoods, to examine whether suboptimal weight loss or reduced adherence to the program varied across neighborhoods.

METHODS

Patients who presented for their initial MBS consultation at the University of Illinois (UI) Health's program between January 2019 and December 2020 were identified from electronic medical records. Demographic and medical information was extracted, along with postoperative weight at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The Chicago area was divided into nine geographic regions. The outcomes of interest were preoperative attrition rate, postoperative compliance to follow-up appointments, and postoperative weight loss for each group and by residential neighborhood.

RESULTS

A total of 1202 patients were included in this analysis, of whom 423 (35%) underwent surgery and 780 did not, representing a pre-surgical attrition rate of 64.9%. Age, sex, and race/ethnic distribution varied markedly across geographic regions. Postoperative weight loss varied significantly in neighborhoods with higher proportions of residents from racial/ethnic minority backgrounds. Preoperative attrition and postoperative compliance did not differ across geographic regions.

CONCLUSION

Patients' residential neighborhoods may influence weight loss after MBS. Preoperative and postoperative compliance did not vary by residential neighborhood.

Factors Associated with Non-Completion of a Pediatric Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Program

BACKGROUND

Childhood obesity is a devastating disease process disproportionately affecting minority and low-income populations. Though bariatric surgery leads to durable weight loss and reversal of multiple obesity-related comorbidities, only a small fraction of pediatric patients undergoes the procedure. We sought to identify factors associated with non-completion in a pediatric bariatric surgery program.

METHODS

Retrospective review of consecutive patients ≤18-years-old referred to an academic adolescent bariatric surgery program between 2017 and 2022 (n = 20 completers, 40 non-completers) was completed. Demographics and medical and psychosocial histories were summarized by completion status.

RESULTS

Of the 33% (20/60; 85% female, 30% racial minorities) who successfully completed the program, the median age was 16 years [IQR 16, 17]. The median age of non-completers was 16 years [IQR 15, 17] (55% female, 56% racial minorities). Non-completion was associated with male gender (15% of completers vs 45% of non-completers, p = 0.022), neighborhood income <150% poverty level (0 completers vs 17.5% of non-completers, p = 0.047), and presence of environmental or family stressors (22% of completers vs 65% of non-completers, p = 0.008). Though not statistically significant, non-completers tended to be racial minorities (p = 0.054).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-completion of the bariatric surgery pathway was more prevalent among male patients from lower-income neighborhoods with significant environmental or family stressors. These patients also tended to be racial and ethnic minorities. The findings underscore the need for further investigation into barriers to pediatric bariatric surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Factors Influencing Referral for Bariatric Surgery by Primary Care Physicians in Northern Israel

PURPOSE

Obesity is a chronic metabolic disease with global distribution among adults and children which affects daily functioning and ultimately quality of life. Primary care physicians (PCPs) provide an important role for the treatment of severe obesity. Better understanding of obesity and its treatment options may increase patients' referral rates to the various treatment modalities, including metabolic/bariatric surgery (MBS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A quantitative cross-sectional study used a self-reported questionnaire among PCPs of Clalit Health Services (CHS) in Northern Israel. The quantitative questionnaire examined the PCP's knowledge, opinions, attitude, and approaches to managing severe obesity.

RESULTS

A total of 246 PCPs from Northern Israel filled the questionnaire (42.9%), the majority were Muslim Arabs (54.5%), who gained their medical degree outside of Israel (73.8%) and practicing for over 10 years (58.8%). 64.3% of PCPs had a high workload (over 100 appointments per week), 77.1% did not know the definition of severe obesity, and 69.17% did not attend educational meetings regarding obesity during the previous year. The referral rate for MBS was 50.4% ± 23.3. Two prognostic factors that had a statistically significant effect on the referral rate for bariatric surgery were the total appointments per week, and the number of practice years. Both had a negative association.

CONCLUSION

The knowledge and referral rates for bariatric surgery are higher among PCPs with lower workload and relatively fewer practice years. Workshops and annual training courses may fortify knowledge and awareness for the treatment of obesity, which in turn could increase the referral rate for MBS.

Assessing the Clinical Efficacy of a Virtual Reality Tool for the Treatment of Obesity: Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Virtual reality (VR) interventions, based on cognitive behavioral therapy principles, have been proven effective as complementary tools in managing obesity and have been associated with promoting healthy behaviors and addressing body image concerns. However, they have not fully addressed certain underlying causes of obesity, such as a lack of motivation to change, low self-efficacy, and the impact of weight stigma interiorization, which often impede treatment adherence and long-term lifestyle habit changes. To tackle these concerns, this study introduces the VR self-counseling paradigm, which incorporates embodiment and body-swapping techniques, along with motivational strategies, to help people living with obesity effectively address some of the root causes of their condition.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the clinical efficacy of ConVRself (Virtual Reality self-talk), a VR platform that allows participants to engage in motivational self-conversations.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 68 participants from the bariatric surgery waiting list from the obesity unit of the Vall d'Hebron University Hospital in Barcelona, Spain. Participants were assigned to 1 of 3 groups: a control group (CG), which only received treatment as usual from the obesity unit; experimental group 1 (EG1), which, after intensive motivational interviewing training, engaged in 4 sessions of VR-based self-conversations with ConVRself, and underwent embodiment and body-swapping techniques; and experimental group 2 (EG2), which engaged in 4 VR-based sessions led by a virtual counselor with a prerecorded discourse, and only underwent the embodiment technique. In the case of both EG1 and EG2, the VR interventions were assisted by a clinical researcher. Readiness to change habits, eating habits, and psychological variables, as well as adherence and satisfaction with ConVRself were measured at baseline, after the intervention, 1 week after the intervention, and 4 weeks after the intervention.

RESULTS

Regarding the primary outcomes, EG1 (24/68, 35%) and EG2 (22/68, 32%) showed significant improvements in confidence to lose weight compared to the CG (22/68, 32%) at all assessment points (β=-.16; P=.02). Similarly, EG1 demonstrated a significant increase after the intervention in readiness to exercise more compared to the CG (β=-.17; P=.03). Regarding the secondary outcomes, EG1 participants showed a significant reduction in uncontrolled eating (β=.71; P=.01) and emotional eating (β=.29; P=.03) compared to the CG participants, as well as in their anxiety levels compared to EG2 and CG participants (β=.65; P=.01). In addition, participants from the experimental groups reported high adherence and satisfaction with the VR platform (EG1: mean 59.82, SD 4.00; EG2: mean 58.43, SD 5.22; d=0.30, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that using VR self-conversations, based on motivational interviewing principles, may have benefits in helping people with obesity to enhance their readiness to change habits and self-efficacy, as well as reduce dysfunctional eating behaviors and anxiety.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05094557; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05094557.

Variation by race/ethnicity in the utilization and weight loss following metabolic bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

Understanding the disparities in utilization and weight loss outcomes of metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) by demographics will inform strategies targeting potential treatment gaps and enhance overall clinical obesity treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors associated with utilization and longitudinal weight loss after MBS.

SETTING

OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium Database.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study using data from the OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium between 2012 and 2018. We used logistic regression with intersectional effects to identify factors associated with utilization of MBS. Mixed-effect models were used to estimate longitudinal percentage total weight loss among those who underwent MBS with up to 18 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

Among 429,821 patients eligible for MBS, 8290 (1.9%) underwent MBS between 2012 and 2018. Intersectional analysis revealed that non-Hispanic Black patients experienced an inferior utilization of MBS compared with non-Hispanic White and Hispanic counterparts, defined by the interaction between race/ethnicity and demographic factors, including male sex, older age, and insurance coverage. In the longitudinal weight loss assessment, 4016 patients (48.3% Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, 51.7% sleeve gastrectomy) were included. We found that non-Hispanic Black patients experienced significantly less weight loss than non-Hispanic White and Hispanic counterparts. Other factors associated with less weight loss over time included undergoing sleeve gastectomy, male sex, lower preoperative body mass index, and having type 2 diabetes at the time of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings will help to design new strategies focusing on the intersection of race/ethnicity and sociodemographic factors to improve access and effectiveness of MBS.

Equity in Obesity Review

Obesity disproportionately affects racial and ethnic minoritized populations and those of lower socioeconomic status. Similarly, disparities exist in the development of its downstream consequences, such as type 2 diabetes and hypertension. The causes of these disparities are multifactorial and are influenced by structural factors such as segregation and healthcare access, and individual-level factors such as weight stigma. Interventions to decrease disparities in obesity should consider macro-level, community, and individual-level factors that might reduce disparities and improve equity in obesity care. Clinicians must also recognize the chronic nature of obesity, and how bias and stigma may impact patient care.

Factors contributing to whether or not people with obesity undergo bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery has been suggested as a safe and effective way to treat obesity by facilitating weight loss, but factors that predict the likelihood of bariatric surgery are unknown. The objective of this study was to describe factors associated with individuals with obesity that influence their decision to undergo bariatric surgery.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The study design was a cross-sectional study and participants were recruited via a survey link posted on the Obesity Action Coalition website. Demographic data, medical data, weight loss program data, and reports of personal experiences were gathered via an online survey. A multivariate logistic regression model was conducted to examine predictors associated with bariatric surgery (N = 4192).

RESULTS

Participants who took phentermine (OR=2.983), Phentermine-topiramate (Qsymia) (OR=2.863), Naltrexone-bupropion (Contrave) (OR=3.246), or Liraglutide (Saxenda) (OR=2.144) had a higher likelihood of undergoing bariatric surgery for weight loss. Participants with type 2 diabetes (OR=1.728), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (OR=1.489), or COVID-19 (OR=3.852) had a higher likelihood of undergoing bariatric surgery while sleep apnea (OR=0.760) was associated with a lower likelihood of receiving surgery. Those who used MyFitnessPal™ (OR=2.232), Noom™ (OR=1.400), Jenny Craig™ (OR=1.533), or Keto (OR=1.664) for weight loss had a higher likelihood of obtaining bariatric surgery. Personal trauma experiences of sexual abuse (OR=1.982) and physical abuse (OR=1.490) were more associated with participants who underwent surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

A variety of characteristics were associated with decisions to undergo bariatric surgery. These findings may help to determine ways to support individuals who are considering bariatric surgery.

A machine learning framework for optimizing obesity care by simulating clinical trajectories and targeted interventions

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the important clinical management bottlenecks that contribute to underuse of weight loss surgery (WLS) and assess risk factors for attrition at each of them.

METHODS

A multistate conceptual model of progression from primary care to WLS was developed and used to study all adults who were seen by a primary care provider (PCP) and eligible for WLS from 2016 to 2017 at a large institution. Outcomes were progression from each state to each subsequent state in the model: PCP visit, endocrine weight management referral, endocrine weight management visit, WLS referral, WLS visit, and WLS.

RESULTS

Beginning with an initial PCP visit, the respective 2-year Kaplan-Meier estimate for each outcome was 35% (n = 2063), 15.6% (n = 930), 6.3% (n = 400), 4.7% (n = 298), and 1.0% (n = 69) among 5876 eligible patients. Individual providers and clinics differed significantly in their referral practices. Female patients, younger patients, those with higher BMI, and those seen by trainees were more likely to progress. A simulated intervention to increase referrals among PCPs would generate about 49 additional WLS procedures over 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

This study discovered novel insights into the specific dynamics underlying low WLS use rates. This methodology permits in silico testing of interventions designed to optimize obesity care prior to implementation.

A qualitative analysis of Black men's attitudes toward obesity and bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is a safe and highly effective treatment for morbid obesity and related co-morbidities. While MBS access and insurance coverage have greatly improved, sex and racial disparities remain in utilization of MBS.

OBJECTIVE

To identify novel intrinsic factors that may explain Black underutilization of surgical treatments for weight management.

SETTING

This study was conducted in metropolitan communities of Western New York.

METHODS

We conducted semistructured face-to-face interviews with 27 adult Black men with a history of obesity and at least 2 obesity-related conditions (diabetes, hypertension, and/or chronic kidney disease [CKD]), about their attitudes, beliefs, behaviors, and habits related to obesity and obesity management. Interview transcripts were reviewed using thematic analysis for patterns and themes.

RESULTS

Most participants did not perceive obesity as a serious health condition and those who had weight-loss goals did not aim for a healthy body mass index (BMI). Trust and respectful communication with physician were very important in making healthcare decisions. MBS was perceived as extreme and dangerous option for weight loss, and only participants with severe symptoms such as chronic pain were open to discussing MBS with their providers. Participants acknowledged lack of role models of similar background who had successfully undergone MBS for obesity.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified misinformation about risks and benefits of MBS and lack of community role models as important factors contributing to Black men's unwillingness to consider MBS. Further research is needed to facilitate patient-provider communication about weight and improve provider's ability and motivation for weight management in primary care settings.

Are male patients undergoing bariatric surgery less healthy than female patients?

BACKGROUND

Male patients are underrepresented in bariatric surgery (BS) despite a relatively equal proportion of men and women experiencing obesity.

OBJECTIVES

Differences in frequency and severity of obesity-associated medical problems (OAMPs) between men and women undergoing BS or in a control group (HELIUS [HEalthy Life In an Urban Setting]) were evaluated. The hypothesis was that men undergoing BS are less healthy than women.

SETTING

A cross-sectional study of 2 cohorts undergoing BS in 2013 (BS2013) and 2019 (BS2019) and a control group of patients with severe obesity from a general population (HELIUS).

METHODS

Characteristics concerning weight and OAMPs, medication usage, intoxications, postoperative complications (for BS2019) were compared between men and women. Members of the HELIUS cohort were tested for eligibility for BS.

RESULTS

Of 3244 patients included, the majority were female (>78.4%). Median (interquartile range) age and body mass index (kg/m2) in male versus female patients were 47.0 (41.0-53.8) versus 43.0 (36.0-51.0) years and 41.5 (38.4-45.2) versus 42.3 (40.2-45.9), respectively, in BS2013, and 52.0 (39.8-57.0) versus 45.0 (35.0-53.0) years and 40.4 (37.4-43.8) versus 41.3 (39.0-44.1) in BS2019 (P < .05). The rates of men with OAMPs were 71.4% and 82.0% compared with 50.2% and 56.9% of women in BS2013 and BS2019, respectively. Overall medication usage was higher in male patients (P = .014). In BS2019, male patients exhibited a higher median HbA1C (P < .001) and blood pressure (P = .003) and used more antihypertensives and antidiabetics (P = .004). Postoperative complications did not differ between men and women. In the control cohort, 66.5% of men and 66.6% of women were eligible for BS.

CONCLUSION

Men undergoing BS more often experience OAMPs than women, and OAMPs are more advanced in men.

Doctors' Perception Regarding Bariatric Surgery and Major Barriers in Referral of Morbidly Obese Patients for Surgery in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

INTRODUCTION

Obesity is on the rise worldwide and has emerged as a global health concern. It has presented itself as the leading cause of morbidity, disability, and healthcare utilization. Bariatric surgery is a viable treatment option that offers sustained weight loss and improvement in comorbidities. The aim of this study is to determine the perception of doctors regarding bariatric surgery and the major barriers to the referral of morbidly obese for surgery.

METHOD

This study is a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted from November 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022. It involved prospective data collection through online questionnaires filled by doctors practicing in Peshawar. The sampling technique was non-probability convenience-based sampling. The sample size was 152. Doctors from all age groups and both genders were included in our study. Non-consenting doctors and those who were practicing bariatric surgery were excluded. Data were analyzed using a statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) version 25.0 (IBM Inc., Armonk, NY). Categorical variables have been presented as frequencies and percentages. Numerical variables have been presented as mean ± SD.

RESULTS

A total of 152 doctors participated in our research study; 92 were physicians and 60 were surgeons. The majority of our study participants' patient load per week was >75. Around 47% believed bariatric surgery was a valuable tool in the treatment of morbid obesity. The most commonly reported barrier to referral was surgical complications or side effects (28.9%).

CONCLUSION

The study concluded that the awareness regarding bariatric and metabolic surgery remains flimsy among the doctor community. Most of the physicians were unaware of the benefits of the surgical management of obesity. They also had doubts regarding the safety of the procedure. We need proper utilization of awareness strategies to overcome these barriers.

Disparities in Access and Quality of Obesity Care

Obesity is a chronic disease and a significant public health threat predicated on complex genetic, psychological, and environmental factors. Individuals with higher body mass index are more likely to avoid health care due to weight stigma. Disparities in obesity care disproportionately impact racial and ethnic minorities. In addition to this unequal disease burden, access to obesity treatment varies significantly. Even if treatment options are theoretically productive, they may be more difficult for low-income families, and racial and ethnic minorities to implement in practice secondary to socioeconomic factors. Lastly, the outcomes of undertreatment are significant. Disparities in obesity foreshadow integral inequality in health outcomes, including disability, and premature mortality.

Obesity among African American people in the United States: A review

Obesity is a growing public health crisis in the United States and is associated with a substantial disease burden due to an increased risk for multiple complications, including cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. As highlighted in this review, obesity disproportionately affects the African American population, women in particular, regardless of socioeconomic status. Structural racism remains a major contributor to health disparities between African American people and the general population, and it limits access to healthy foods, safe spaces to exercise, adequate health insurance, and medication, all of which impact obesity prevalence and outcomes. Conscious and unconscious interpersonal racism also impacts obesity care and outcomes in African American people and may adversely affect interactions between health care practitioners and patients. To reduce health disparities, structural racism and racial bias must be addressed. Culturally relevant interventions for obesity management have been successfully implemented that have shown benefits in weight management and risk-factor reduction. Strategies to improve health care practitioner-patient engagement should also be implemented to improve health outcomes in African American people with obesity. When managing obesity in African American people, it is critical to take a holistic approach and to consider an individual's social and cultural context in order to implement a successful treatment strategy.

Outcomes and Trends of Endoscopic Bariatric Therapies (EBT) Among Minority Populations

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic bariatric therapies (EBT) have emerged as effective options for weight loss. While the benefits of EBT have been documented, data regarding such therapies among minority populations remains scant. We aim to investigate EBT trends and outcomes in minority populations.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the 2015 to 2019 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Project (MBSAQIP) databases. Intragastric balloon (IGB) and endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) cases were identified, and procedure volume assessed by year and race/ethnicity. Measures of interest included year-to-year mortality, surgical complications, and 30-day adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 966,646 cases in the MBSAQIP databases, 5209 (0.54%) IGB and ESG cases were included. 10.7% were black, and 81.6% were female patients. Compared to white patients, black and Hispanic patients were younger (p < 0.01) with a higher body mass index (p < 0.001). Mortality (0.03% vs. 0% vs. 0%, p = 0.99), reoperation (1.1% vs. 0.8% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.30), and reintervention (3.9% vs. 3.2% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.09) rates were similar between racial/ethnic cohorts. All complications were similar between racial/ethnic cohorts, except a higher rate of venous thromboembolism, in Hispanic (1.04%, p < 0.01) compared to black (0.18%) and white (0.21%) patients. IGB and ESG were predominantly performed in white and Hispanic patients, respectively. ESG was associated with a higher leak (0.6% vs. 0.02%, p < 0.01) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) (1.0% vs. 0.12%, p < 0.01) rate.

CONCLUSION

While EBTs have increased annually, they are performed less in black patients. Future studies are needed to identify access barriers for black patients. They are safely performed with similar outcomes in racial/ethnic cohorts, except for a higher VTE rate in Hispanic patients.

Racial variation in baseline characteristics and wait times among patients undergoing bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

Although bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for obesity and weight-related comorbid diseases, utilization rates are disproportionately low among non-white patients. We sought to understand if variation in baseline characteristics or access to care exists between white and non-white patients.

METHODS

Using a statewide bariatric-specific data registry, we evaluated all patients who underwent bariatric surgery between 2006 and 2020 and completed a preoperative baseline questionnaire, which included a question about self-identification of race. Patient characteristics, co-morbidities, and time from initial preoperative clinic evaluation to date of surgery were compared among racial groups.

RESULTS

A total of 73,141 patients met inclusion criteria with 18,741 (25.5%) self-identified as non-white. These included Black/African American (n = 11,904), Hispanic (n = 3448), Asian (n = 121), Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (n = 41), Middle Eastern (n = 164), Multiple (n = 2047) and other (n = 608). Non-white males were the least represented group, accounting for only 4% of all bariatric cases performed. Non-white patients were more likely to be younger (43.0 years vs. 46.6 years, p < 0.0001), disabled (16% vs. 11.4%, p < 0.0001) and have Medicaid (8.4% vs. 3.8%, p < 0.0001) when compared to white patients, despite having higher rates of college education (78.0% vs. 76.6, p < 0.0001). In addition, median time from initial evaluation to surgery was also longer among non-white patients (157 days vs. 127 days, p < 0.0001), despite having higher rates of patients with a body mass index above 50 kg/m2 (39.0% vs. 33.2%, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-white patients undergoing bariatric surgery represent an extremely diverse group of patients with more socioeconomic disadvantages and longer wait times when compared to white patients despite presenting with higher rates of severe obesity. Current guidelines and referral patterns for bariatric surgery may not be equitable and need further examination when considering the management of obesity within diverse populations to reduce disparities in care-of which non-white males are particularly at risk.

Impact of refitted race-free eGFR formula on obesity pharmacotherapy options

OBJECTIVE

Recent changes to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) formula (2021 CKD-EPI) removed race from the 2009 formula, increasing the number of Black people classified as having CKD, but these changes may impact eligibility and/or dosing for antiobesity medications. This study estimated the number of people with obesity nationwide who might have pharmacotherapy options impacted by the new formula.

METHODS

Using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) cohort study data, the number of people eligible for antiobesity medication was estimated, and the number who would require a dosage reduction or would no longer be eligible for specific medications based on the new eGFR formula was also estimated.

RESULTS

Among 16,412,571 Black and 109,654,751 non-Black people eligible for antiobesity medication, 911,336 (6.1%) Black and 6,925,492 (6.6%) non-Black people had ≥CKD stage 3 by the 2009 CKD-EPI formula. Applying the 2021 CKD-EPI formula, 1,260,969 (8.5%) Black people and 4,989,919 (4.7%) non-Black people had ≥CKD stage 3. For medications requiring renal adjustment, the number of Black people who would require a lower dose or be precluded from using a medication increased by 24.7% to 50.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings highlight the importance of measuring-rather than estimating-GFR in Black people with CKD when considering many antiobesity pharmacotherapy options.

Questioning the legitimacy of bariatric surgery: a qualitative analysis of individuals from the community who qualify for bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

Little is known about how individuals in the community who qualify for bariatric surgery perceive it and how this affects their likelihood to consider it for themselves. This study is the first qualitative study of a racially and ethnically diverse cohort to understand perceptions of bariatric surgery.

METHODS

We designed a descriptive study to understand attitudes about bariatric surgery. We interviewed 32 individuals who met NIH criteria for bariatric surgery but have never considered bariatric surgery. We purposively sampled to ensure the majority of participants were non-white. Using an Interpretive Description framework, an exploratory, iterative method was used to code interviews and arrive at final themes.

RESULTS

Participants self-identified as 88% female, 75% Black, 3% Hispanic, 3% Pacific Islander, and 19% white. Three major themes emerged from our data regarding legitimacy of bariatric surgery. First, participants perceived bariatric surgery to be something commercialized rather than needed treatment. They equated bariatric surgery with "botulism of the lips" or "cool sculpting." Second, an important contributor to the lack of legitimacy as a medical treatment was that many had not heard about bariatric surgery before from their doctors. Doctors were trusted sources for legitimate information about health. Lastly, conflicting information over bariatric surgery-related diet and weight loss further diminished the legitimacy of bariatric surgery. As one participant reflected about pre-operative weight loss requirements, "[If] I'm going to do that, I might as well just keep losing the weight. Why even go do the surgery?".

CONCLUSION

Though bariatric surgery is a safe, effective, and durable therapy for patients with obesity, the majority of individuals we interviewed had concerns over the legitimacy of bariatric surgery as a medical treatment. Moving forward in reaching out to communities about bariatric surgery, healthcare providers and systems should consider the presentation of information to attenuate these concerns.

Primary care physicians’ knowledge and attitudes about obesity, adherence to treatment guidelines and association with confidence to treat obesity: a Swedish survey study

Background

Obesity is a chronic disease with increasing prevalence. We aimed to explore primary care physicians’ knowledge and attitudes about obesity and how knowledge and attitudes are associated with confidence and adherence to obesity guidelines and barriers to obesity treatment.

Methods

A questionnaire survey was sent by e-mail to 1642 primary care physicians in four regions in Sweden. The survey focused on the physicians’ knowledge, attitudes towards obesity, confidence in obesity management, adherence to obesity guidelines and barriers to optimal care. We created different statistical indices for knowledge, attitudes and adherence. To analyse the correlation between these indices, we used linear regression analyses.

Results

Replies from 235 primary care physicians yielded a response rate of 14.3%. Most physicians answered correctly that obesity is a disease (91%), that obesity regulation sits in the hypothalamus (70%) and that obesity is due to disorders of appetite regulation (69%). However, 44% of the physicians thought that the most effective weight reduction method for severe obesity was lifestyle changes; 47% believed that obesity is due to lack of self-control, 14% mentioned lack of motivation and 22% stated laziness. Although 97% believed that physicians can help individuals with obesity and 56% suggested that obesity treatment should be prioritised, 87% of the physicians expressed that losing weight is the patients’ responsibility. There was a positive association between higher knowledge and better adherence to obesity guidelines (B = 0.07, CI 0.02–0.12, p-value = 0.005) and feeling confident to suggest medication (p < 0.001) or bariatric surgery (p = 0.002). While 99% of the physicians felt confident to discuss lifestyle changes, 67% and 81% were confident to suggest medication or bariatric surgery, respectively. Respondents perceived that the greatest barrier in obesity management was lack of time (69%) and resources (49%).

Conclusion

There was a positive association between Swedish primary care physicians’ knowledge and adherence to obesity guidelines and being more confident to suggest obesity treatment. Yet, many physicians had an ambivalent attitude towards obesity management.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-022-01811-x.

Racial Differences in Bariatric Surgical Approach: a Cross-Sectional National Inpatient Sample Analysis

PURPOSE

Although racial inequalities in referral and access to bariatric surgical care have been well reported, racial difference in the selection of surgical techniques is understudied. This study examined factors associated with the utilization of the two main bariatric surgical techniques: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample database was queried for patients who underwent elective LSG or LRYGB for the treatment of severe obesity. Chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression assessed associations of surgical approach with patient and facility characteristics. Sensitivity analyses examined the following body mass index (BMI) subgroups: < 40.0 kg/m², 40.0-44.9 kg/m², 45.0-49.9 kg/m², and ≥ 50.0 kg/m².

RESULTS

Within the final cohort (N = 86,053), 73.0% (N = 62,779) underwent LSG, and 27.0% (N = 23,274) underwent LRYGB. Patients with BMI 45.0-49.9 kg/m² (OR = 0.85) and BMI ≥ 50.0 kg/m² (OR = 0.80) were less likely to undergo LSG than patients with BMI 40.0-45.0 kg/m² (all p < 0.001). However, Black (OR = 1.74) and White Hispanic patients (OR = 1.30) were more likely to undergo LSG than White non-Hispanic patients (all p < 0.005). In the BMI ≥ 50.0 kg/m² group, Black patients were still more likely to undergo LSG compared to White non-Hispanic patients (OR = 1.69, p < 0.001), while Asians/Pacific Islanders were less likely to receive LSG than White non-Hispanic patients (OR = 0.41, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In this observational study, we identified racial differences in the selection of common bariatric surgical approaches across various BMI categories. Future investigations are warranted to study and to promote awareness of the racial/ethnic influence in attitudes on obesity, weight loss, financial support, and surgical risks during bariatric discussions with minorities.

Gender Disparities in Bariatric Surgery Among African Americans

Despite being equally affected by obesity, females represent the vast majority of obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. We aimed to identify potential gender disparities among African American (AA) patients seeking bariatric surgery at our institution. Demographics, presence of comorbidities, socio-economic variables, type of consultation, and attrition rates were compared among male and female patients. A total of 710 patients were referred for bariatric surgery; 468 (65.9%) were AA: 68 (14.5%) male and 400 (85.5%) female. Male patients were older, were more frequently married, and had higher prevalence of obesity-related comorbidities, as compared to female patients. Male patients showed significantly higher high school graduation rates, higher income, and longer distance to the hospital. The use of telehealth was similar in both groups. Male patients had significantly higher attrition rates (73.5% vs. 56.7%, p=0.009). Strategies to better promote and increase access to bariatric surgery to male patients should be prioritized.

Factors Associated With Bariatric Surgery Referral Patterns: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Bariatric surgery (BS) has been shown to effectively treat morbid obesity and improve obesity-related comorbidities. Nonetheless, BS remains underutilized among qualified patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, SCOPUS, and OVID databases were searched to identify published comparative studies examining BS referral patterns. Data on barriers to BS referrals were examined and summarized.

RESULTS

Barriers to referrals stemmed largely from a lack of familiarity with safety, efficacy, and postoperative care amongst providers. Providers with previous referrals were more likely to report higher knowledge, comfort in referring patients, and ability to provide postoperative care. Provider initiated discussion of BS was positively associated with referrals. Female and younger patients were more likely to receive referrals. Furthermore, access to appropriate peri-operative resources, local bariatric programs, and insurance eligibility were associated with referral rates. Encouragingly, providers across specialties report eagerness to gain exposure and training in BS.

CONCLUSIONS

Lack of provider familiarity with BS efficacy, safety and postoperative care likely contributes to low utilization rates of BS. Further potential barriers in access to BS are logistic factors such as insurance coverage, limited local perioperative resources, and clinic time constraints for patient counseling. Promotion of BS amongst providers and both surgical and non-surgical trainees will likely have a significant impact on referral rates and access to this life-saving procedure. Future studies should further investigate the barriers to BS and delineate the effect size of each barrier on referral rates to efficiently increase access.

Understanding Racially Diverse Community Member Views of Obesity Stigma and Bariatric Surgery

Purpose

The obesity epidemic poses serious challenges to health equity. Despite bariatric surgery being one of the most effective obesity treatments, utilization remains low. In this context, we explored public perceptions of bariatric surgery, centering voices of Black individuals.

Materials and Methods

Semi-structured interviews with individuals who have never considered bariatric surgery with purposive sampling to ensure the majority of participants were Black. Transcripts were iteratively analyzed. We employed an Interpretive Description framework to arrive at a collective description of perceptions of bariatric surgery.

Results

Thirty-two participants self-identified as 88% female, 72% Black, 3% Hispanic, 3% Pacific Islander, 3% Mixed Race, and 19% White. Participants reported a complex interplay of deeply held, stigmatized beliefs about identity. According to the stigma, persons with obesity lacked willpower and thus were considered devalued. Participants internalized this stigma, describing themselves with words like “glutton,” “lazy,” and “slack off.” Because stigma caused participants to view obesity as resulting from personal failings alone, socially acceptable ways to lose weight were discipline through diet and exercise. Working for weight loss was “self-love, self-discipline, and determination.” Thus, bariatric surgery was illegitimate, a “shortcut to weight loss” or “easy way out,” since it was outside acceptable methods of effort.

Conclusion

This qualitative study of community members who qualify for bariatric surgery shows obesity stigma was the main reason individuals rejected bariatric surgery. Obesity was stigmatizing, but undergoing bariatric surgery would further stigmatize individuals. Thus, healthcare providers may be instrumental in increasing bariatric surgery uptake by shifting social discourse from stigmatized notions of obesity towards one focusing on health.

Graphical Abstract

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11695-022-05928-x.

Individual-level barriers to bariatric surgery from patient and provider perspectives: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Less than 1% adults in the United States who meet body mass index criteria undergo bariatric surgery. Our objective was to identify patient and provider perceptions of individual-level barriers to undergoing bariatric surgery.

METHODS

Adults with severe obesity and obesity care providers described their experiences with the bariatric surgery care process in semi-structured interviews. Using conventional content analysis, individual-level barriers were identified within Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use.

RESULTS

Of the 73 individuals interviewed, 36 (49%) were female, and 15 (21%) were non-white. Six individual-level barriers were identified: fear of surgery, fear of lifestyle change, perception that weight had not reached its "tipping point," concerns about dietary changes, lack of social support, and patient characteristics influencing referral.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient and provider education should address patient fears of surgery and the belief that surgery is a "last resort." Bariatric surgery programs should strengthen social support networks for patients.

Referral and utilization of paediatric bariatric surgery in an academic freestanding children's hospital with dedicated paediatric bariatric programme

OBJECTIVE

This report estimates the percent of medically eligible adolescents who are referred for metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) evaluation or factors associated with referral.

METHODS

This cross-sectional retrospective review evaluated patients aged 13 to 18 years seen between 2017 and 2019 for demographics, insurance status, body mass index (BMI), obesity-related comorbidities, and compared these data to patients whom had been referred and received MBS.

RESULTS

Half of the patients (86 411/163137, 53%) between ages of 13 and 18 years identified had BMI documented, of which, 1974 (2.3%) were medically eligible for MBS, 238 (12%) were referred for MBS and 52 (22%) underwent MBS. Females had similar odds of being eligible for MBS [odds ratio (OR) = 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92-1.11, P = .9], but greater odds of referral (OR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.13-2.23, P = .009). Independently, miniorities and patients with public insurance had higher odds of being eligible for MBS, but similar odds of being referred as non-Hispanic white patients. Black patients with public insurance had greater odds of being referred for MBS (OR = 12.22, 95% CI 2.08-235.15, P = .022). Patients' multiple comorbidities had greater odds of being referred for MBS (OR = 2.16, 95% CI 1.29-3.68, P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

Referral is barrier for patients medically eligible for MBS; however, this barrier is not uniformly faced by all patients.

Systemic and Environmental Contributors to Obesity Inequities in Marginalized Racial and Ethnic Groups

Obesity is a multifactorial disease that disproportionally affects diverse racial and ethnic groups. Structural racism influences racial inequities in obesity prevalence through environmental factors, such as racism and discrimination, socioeconomic status, increased levels of stress, and bias in the health care delivery system. Researchers, clinicians, and policy makers must work to address the environmental and systematic barriers that contribute to health inequities in the United States. Specifically, clinicians should quantitatively and qualitatively assess environmental and social factors and proactively engage in patient-centered care to tailor available treatments based on identified needs and experiences.

Examination of Elective Bariatric Surgery Rates Before and After US Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansion

Importance

There is limited evidence on whether the Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion beginning in 2014 improved access to elective procedures. Uninsured individuals are at higher risk of obesity and may have experienced improved uptake of bariatric surgery following Medicaid expansion.

Objective

To examine the association between Medicaid expansion and the receipt of inpatient elective bariatric surgery among Medicaid-covered and uninsured individuals aged 26 to 64 years.

Design Setting and Participants

This cohort study used difference-in-differences analysis of all-payer data (2010-2017) of 637 557 elective bariatric surgeries for patients aged 26 to 74 years from 11 Medicaid expansion states and 6 nonexpansion states. Nonexpansion states and individuals aged 65 to 74 years were control cohorts. Data analysis was performed from July 6, 2020, to July 23, 2021.

Exposure

Living in a Medicaid expansion state.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcomes were the (1) number of elective bariatric surgeries, (2) population count, and (3) rate of bariatric surgery (number of surgeries per 10 000 population) among Medicaid-covered and uninsured individuals.

Results

Of the 600 798 elective bariatric surgeries in adults aged 26 to 64 years between 2010 and 2017 from the 17 study states, Medicaid-covered and uninsured individuals accounted for 18.3% of the total surgery volume in expansion states and 14.5% in nonexpansion states. A total of 296 798 patients (78.9%) in expansion states were women vs 177 386 (78.9%) in nonexpansion states. Among individuals aged 26 to 64 years, the median age was 44 (IQR, 37-52) years. Racial and ethnic distribution was non-Hispanic White, 60.2%; non-Hispanic Black, 17.7%; Hispanic, 16.6%; and other, 5.5%. Between 2013 and 2017, the volume of bariatric surgeries for Medicaid-covered and uninsured patients increased annually by 30.3% in expansion states and 16.5% in nonexpansion states. Medicaid expansion was associated with a 36.6% annual increase (95% CI, 8.2% to 72.5%) in surgery volume, a 9.0% annual increase (95% CI, 3.8% to 14.5%) in the population, and a 25.5% change (95% CI, -1.3% to 59.4%) in the rate of bariatric surgery. By race and ethnicity, Medicaid expansion was associated with an increase in the rate of bariatric surgery among non-Hispanic White individuals (31.6%; 95% CI, 6.1% to 63.0%) but no significant change among non-Hispanic Black (5.9%; 95% CI, -19.8% to 39.9%) and Hispanic (28.9%; 95% CI, -24.4% to 119.8%) individuals.

Conclusions and Relevance

This cohort study found that Medicaid expansion was associated with increased rates of bariatric surgery among lower-income non-Hispanic White individuals, but not among Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black individuals.

Patient-provider discussions of bariatric surgery and subsequent weight changes and receipt of bariatric surgery

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients who discuss bariatric surgery with their providers are more likely to undergo the procedure and to lose weight.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of adults with BMI ≥ 35 kg/m² treated between 2000 and 2015 was conducted to analyze the relationship between a discussion of bariatric surgery in the first year after study entry and weight changes (primary outcome) and receipt of bariatric surgery (secondary outcome) over 2 years after study entry. Natural language processing was used to identify the documentation of bariatric surgery discussion in electronic provider notes.

RESULTS

Out of 30,560 study patients, a total of 2,659 (8.7%) discussed bariatric surgery with their providers. The BMI of patients who discussed bariatric surgery decreased by 2.18 versus 0.21 for patients who did not (p < 0.001). In a multivariable analysis, patients who discussed bariatric surgery with their providers lost more weight (by 1.43 [change in BMI]; 95% CI: 1.29-1.57) and had greater odds (10.2; 95% CI: 9.0-11.6; p < 0.001) of undergoing bariatric surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians rarely discussed bariatric surgery with their patients. Patients who did have this discussion were more likely to lose weight and to undergo bariatric surgery.

Introducing a Bariatric Surgery Program at a Large Urban Safety Net Medical Center Serving a Primarily Hispanic Patient Population

Background

Few bariatric surgery programs exist at safety net hospitals which often serve patients of diverse racial and socioeconomic backgrounds. A bariatric surgery program was developed at a large urban safety net medical center serving a primarily Hispanic population. The purpose of this study was to evaluate safety, feasibility, and first-year outcomes to pave the way for other safety net bariatric programs.

Methods

The bariatric surgery program was started at a safety net hospital located in a neighborhood with over twice the national poverty rate. A retrospective review was performed for patient demographics, comorbidities, preoperative diet and exercise habits, perioperative outcomes, and 1-year outcomes including percent total weight lost (%TWL) and comorbidity reduction.

Results

A total of 153 patients underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy from May 2017 through December 2019. The average preoperative BMI was 47.9kg/m², and 54% of patients had diabetes. The 1-year follow-up rate was 94%. There were no mortalities and low complication rates. The average 1-year %TWL was 22.8%. Hypertension and diabetes medications decreased in 52% and 55% of patients, respectively. The proportion of diabetic patients with postoperative HbA1c <6.0% was 49%.

Conclusion

This is one of the first reports on the outcomes of a bariatric surgery program at a safety net hospital. This analysis demonstrates feasibility and safety, with no mortalities, low complication rates, and acceptable %TWL and comorbidity improvement. More work is needed to investigate the impacts of race, culture, and socioeconomic factors on bariatric outcomes in this population.

Graphical abstract

Adolescent Bariatric Surgery: Racial Disparities in 30-Day Outcomes Using the MBSAQIP from 2015 to 2018

INTRODUCTION

Racial disparities exist in obesity prevalence and obesity-related comorbid conditions among youth. We hypothesized that non-White adolescents would have poorer 30-day outcomes after adolescent bariatric surgery.

METHODS

Adolescent patients 19 years or younger who had bariatric surgery from January 2015 to December 2018 were identified in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Initiative Program datafiles. Patient characteristics and 30-day perioperative outcomes were compared across racial groups. Trends in utilization of adolescent bariatric surgery were evaluated by race and procedure.

RESULTS

Bariatric surgery was performed in 3177 adolescents with a mean age of 17.9 years [standard deviation (SD) 1.1 years]. The majority of patients were White 71.5% (2,271), while only 16.4% (520) were Black, and 12.1% (386) were other. Black adolescents 42.7% (222) more commonly presented with a BMI >50kg/m² compared to 28.4% (645) White and 27.2% (105) other. Baseline hypertension and sleep apnea were more common among Black adolescents than other racial groups (P< 0.05). Black adolescents with LRYGB comprised 4.6% (48) of procedures in 2015 and only 1.5% (11) in 2018. Clavien-Dindo complications and all-cause readmission rates were similar among racial groups. Mean BMI decrease after 30 days was greatest for Black patients after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, with a loss of 3.1 BMI points (SD 1.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite similar short-term outcomes, significant disparities exist for Black adolescents who qualify for bariatric surgery. Further investigation is warranted to better understand the racial differences that limit access and utilization of this safe and effective intervention.

Patient Motivations and Goals for Bariatric Surgery: A Mixed Methods Study

BACKGROUND

Existing research has primarily focused on weight as the outcome of interest for bariatric surgery; however, patients frequently report other lifestyle and interpersonal surgery motivations and goals. Understanding the spectrum of bariatric surgery goals and motivations has important implications for enhancing patient-centered care and surgery outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

The current study characterized the nature of bariatric patient motivations and goals for surgery, described the extent to which motivations matched goals, and examined whether men and women differed in the specific motivations/goals described.

SETTING

Teaching hospital, United States METHODS: Data were obtained via retrospective chart review of bariatric patient responses to the clinic's standard open-ended questions about motivations and goals for bariatric surgery. A mixed method approach was used, including content analysis, to identify themes and χ²/t test analyses to test gender differences.

RESULTS

Surgery motivations and outcome goals were reflected by 8 overarching and overlapping themes. The most common motivations were related to general health and quality of life. The most common goals were to improve health/longevity and mobility. Over a quarter of patients showed no overlap between motivations and goals. Few gender differences were observed.

CONCLUSION

Findings underscore the importance of goals beyond weight loss, as well as the utility of helping patients shape their goals in accordance with goal-setting theories.

Primary care physicians' knowledge, attitudes and concerns about bariatric surgery and the association with referral patterns: a Swedish survey study

BACKGROUND

Obesity prevalence is increasing globally. Bariatric surgery is an effective treatment for severe and complex obesity resulting in significant and sustained weight loss. In Sweden, most bariatric surgery patients are referred by primary care physicians. We aimed to explore barriers for physicians to refer patients with severe and complex obesity for bariatric surgery.

METHODS

A questionnaire survey was in 2019 emailed to 1100 primary care physicians in the Skåne and Kronoberg regions in south Sweden. The survey focused on referral patterns, knowledge and attitudes towards bariatric surgery and concerns about postoperative complications. We created different statistical indices for referral patterns, knowledge, attitudes and concerns about bariatric surgery. To analyze the correlation between these indices, we did Spearman's correlations and regression analyses.

RESULTS

Of 1100 email respondents, we received 157 (14%) completed surveys. Among 157 physician respondents, 73% answered that they had good knowledge about the referral criteria for bariatric surgery, whereas 55 and 60% answered correctly to two items on criteria for bariatric surgery. A majority of respondents (84%) stated that their patients initiated referral to bariatric surgery. Half of the respondents had concerns about postoperative medical and surgical complications, but another half had a positive attitude to bariatric surgery as a treatment for obesity comorbidities. Almost half of the respondents (44%) answered that they needed to learn more about bariatric surgery. We found significant positive correlations between high knowledge and referral patterns (r = 0.292, p < 0.001) and positive attitudes (r = 0.235, p < 0.001) respectively. We found significant reverse correlations between concerns and referral patterns (r = - 0.355, p < 0.001) and between positive attitudes and concerns (r = - 0.294, p < 0.001). In logistic regression high levels of concerns explained low willingness to refer for bariatric surgery (Odds Ratio 0.2, 95% confidence interval 0.1-0.7).

CONCLUSION

According to this Swedish survey among primary care physicians, high levels of concerns about bariatric surgery among physicians seemed to be a barrier to refer patients with severe and complex obesity for bariatric surgery. Since high knowledge about obesity and bariatric surgery correlated negatively to concerns and positively to favorable attitudes to bariatric surgery, more knowledge about obesity and bariatric surgery is warranted.

Factors Associated with Weight Loss After Metabolic Surgery in a Multiethnic Sample of 1012 Patients

BACKGROUND

Metabolic surgery is the most effective method for weight loss in the long-term treatment of morbid obesity and its comorbidities. The primary aim of this study was to examine factors associated with percent total weight loss (%TWL) after metabolic surgery among an ethnically diverse sample of patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on 1012 patients who underwent either a sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) at our institution between January 2008 and June 2015.

RESULTS

African Americans had a lower %TWL than non-Hispanic/Latino Whites at 6, 9, 12, 18, and 48 months. At all timeframes, there was a negative association between pre-surgery TWL and %TWL after surgery. Female sex was negatively associated with %TWL at 3 months only. Higher initial BMI was also associated with greater post-operative %TWL at 18, 24 and 36 months. Older patients had lower %TWL at 6, 9, 12 and 24 months post-surgery. Patients who received RYGB had greater %TWL than those who received SG at 3, 6, 9, 12, 24 and 36 months.

CONCLUSIONS

African Americans had a lower %TWL than non-Hispanic/Latino Whites at most time points; there were no other significant race/ethnicity or sex differences. BMI (greater initial BMI), age (lower) and RYGB were associated with a greater post-operative %TWL at certain post-surgery follow-up time points. A limitation of this study is that there was missing data at a number of time points due to lack of attendance at certain follow-up visits.

Primary Care Physicians' Perceptions of Bariatric Surgery and Major Barriers to Referral

BACKGROUND

Each year from 2011 to 2017, fewer than 1% of eligible Americans underwent bariatric surgery to treat obesity and obesity-related comorbidities. Recent studies have suggested that a lack of knowledge within the primary care specialty about the safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery greatly affects referral. This study aimed to analyze a large cohort of primary care physicians' (PCPs) clinical perceptions regarding bariatric surgery and to identify major barriers to referral that could inform the implementation of a future educational strategy to address underutilization of bariatric surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective anonymous electronic survey was sent to all primary care physicians at a multicenter community-based academic hospital system between March and June of 2018, with 150 respondents, a response rate of 28%. The survey was composed of eleven questions in total, the first eight utilizing a five-point Likert scale, with answers including strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, and strongly agree. The final three questions utilized freeform answers of numbers or text where appropriate.

RESULTS

Between 83 and 88% of PCPs responded favorably, either agree or strongly agree, to questions regarding the utility of bariatric surgery as an efficacious and valuable tool for the treatment of obesity and related comorbidities. PCPs reported an average body mass index (BMI) of 40.4 ± 5.0 kg/m² at which bariatric surgery is a patient's best option for weight loss and an average BMI of 38.0 ± 5.6 kg/m² at which surgery is the best option for management of comorbidities. Eighty-six percent of PCPs agree that having a BMI over 40 kg/m² is a greater risk to a patient's long-term health than undergoing bariatric surgery. However, only 46.6% of PCPs claimed any familiarity with the NIH eligibility criteria for bariatric surgery and only 59.5% responded affirmatively that they were comfortable participating in the long-term care of a postoperative bariatric patient. The two highest reported barriers to referral for bariatric surgery together account for 40% of PCPs responses: 21.5% of PCPs report concern regarding surgical complications and/or long-term side effects as the primary barrier for referral, and 18.5% report concern for ineffective weight loss after bariatric surgery as a primary barrier to referral.

CONCLUSION

Results of this study indicate that despite largely positive attitudes toward the use of bariatric surgery in a patient population with obesity, primary care physicians report significant barriers to confidently referring their own patients. Further, bariatric surgery is overlooked in a large group of patients with BMIs between 35 and 40 kg/m². Educational strategies to address these barriers should target rates of specific surgical complications and weight loss outcomes.

The Bariatric Experience Long Term (BELONG): Factors Related to Having Bariatric Surgery in a Large Integrated Healthcare System

PURPOSE

Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for severe obesity, but currently, only 1-2% of all eligible patients undergo surgery each year. This study examined which factors were associated with a patient receiving bariatric surgery after referral in a real-world healthcare setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The current study used the baseline survey and electronic medical record (EMR) data from the Bariatric Experience Long Term (BELONG) study (n = 1975). Predictors of who did (n = 1680) and who did not (n = 295) have surgery were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

Participants (n = 1975; 42.4% response rate) were primarily women (84%) and either non-Hispanic Black or Hispanic (60%). In the fully adjusted multivariate model, the strongest predictors of having surgery were being a woman (OR = 3.17; 95% CI = 2.15, 4.68; p < .001) and losing at least 5% of their body weight in the year before surgery (OR = 3.16; 95% CI = 2.28, 4.38; p < .001). The strongest predictors of not having surgery were a ≥ BMI 50 kg/m2 (OR = .39; 95% CI = .27, .56; p < .001) and having a higher physical comorbidity burden (OR = .84; 95% CI = .75, .94; p = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

Practices such as 5-10% total weight loss before surgery and selection of patients with safer operative risk profiles (younger with lower comorbidity burden) may inadvertently contribute to under-utilization of bariatric surgery among some demographic subpopulations who could most benefit from this intervention.

Nomograms for Predicting Non-remission in Patients Who Underwent Bariatric Surgery: A Multicenter Retrospective Study in China

BACKGROUND

As a reflection of the increasing global incidence of obesity, there is a corresponding increase in the proportion of obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. This study reviewed the factors and outcomes of patients who underwent bariatric surgical procedures and determined the relationships and developed a nomogram to calculate individualized patient risk.

METHODS

The nomogram was based on a retrospective study on 259 patients who underwent bariatric surgery at the Chengdu Third People's Hospital from June 2017 to June 2019. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability of the nomogram were determined by the ROC curve and C-index, respectively. The results were validated using bootstrap resampling and a retrospective study on 121 patients operated on from May 2015 to May 2019 at the Tenth People's Hospital of Shanghai.

RESULTS

The predictors contained in the prediction nomogram included age, sex, surgical approach, hyperlipidemia, blood pressure (BP), hyperuricemia, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference (WC). The 6-month model displayed good discrimination with a C-index of 0.765 (95% CI: 0.756 to 0.774) and good calibration. The 1-year model reached a C-index of 0.768 (95% CI, 0.759 to 0.777) in the training cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed nomogram resulted in more accurate non-remission prediction for patients with obesity after bariatric surgery and may provide a reference for the preoperative choice of surgical methods.

Bariatric Surgery Is Associated with a Recent Temporal Increase in Colorectal Cancer Resections, Most Pronounced in Adults Below 50 Years of Age

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer incidence is rising in adults < 50 years old, possibly due to obesity. Having bariatric surgery (BRS) should hypothetically reduce this trend, but data are limited. This study compared trends of colorectal cancer (CRC) versus other obesity-related gastrointestinal cancers (OGCs) between morbidly obese and post-BRS subjects.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study investigated OGC resection trends using the 2006-2013 National Inpatient Sample. Patients with prior BRS and non-BRS controls with body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m² were included (n = 30,279 total). We divided OGCs into CRC and non-CRC OGCs (esophageal, stomach, liver, gallbladder, and pancreas). We calculated OGC resection trends in patients < 50 and ≥ 50 years old using the average annual percent change (AAPC).

RESULTS

BRS patients with OGCs were younger (59.3 vs 62.3 years old), with more female gender (77.4% vs 57.1%) and White race (72.6% vs 67%) compared with controls (p < 0.05). The number of CRC resections increased across all ages in 2006-2013, especially rectal cancer for BRS patients (AAPC + 19.8%, p = 0.04). The steepest rise in early-onset CRC resections was after BRS versus a lesser increase in morbid obesity controls (AAPC + 18.7% and + 13.7%, respectively, p < 0.001). In contrast, non-CRC OGCs increased in our controls but not post-BRS. In a sensitivity analysis, estimated CRC incidence trends also increased post-BRS despite adjusting for increasing BRS prevalence.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that bariatric surgery is associated with a persistent increase in early-onset CRC trends. Studies are warranted to validate our results and test the impact of bariatric surgery on early-onset CRC biological mechanisms.

Barriers impacting an individuals decision to undergo bariatric surgery: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Bariatric surgery is a procedure intended to control morbid obesity but it is minimally utilized in the United States. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to identify common barriers to proceeding and completing bariatric surgery.

METHODS

Pubmed, Medline, CINAHL, and Google Scholar were used to identify articles published between the years 2010-2020, written in English, and included adults with a BMI ≥ 35 with a desire to undergo bariatric surgery.

RESULTS

From the 10 included studies, 7 of which were conducted in the United States, the following were the most cited barriers to undergoing surgery: insurance, socioeconomic status, language spoken and ethnicity, sex, and risk of surgery. Three of the studies also noted that the reason specific ethnic groups were less likely to undergo surgery was secondary to their economic status or insurance type.

CONCLUSIONS

Undergoing bariatric surgery is highly dependent on an individual's demographics. Future research on this topic may help medical practitioners learn how to minimize or remove these barriers to make bariatric surgery more feasible for all populations.

Novel Insights into the Pathogenesis and Management of the Metabolic Syndrome

The metabolic syndrome, by definition, is not a disease but is a clustering of individual metabolic risk factors including abdominal obesity, hyperglycemia, hypertriglyceridemia, hypertension, and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. These risk factors could dramatically increase the prevalence of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The reported prevalence of the metabolic syndrome varies, greatly depending on the definition used, gender, age, socioeconomic status, and the ethnic background of study cohorts. Clinical and epidemiological studies have clearly demonstrated that the metabolic syndrome starts with central obesity. Because the prevalence of obesity has doubly increased worldwide over the past 30 years, the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome has markedly boosted in parallel. Therefore, obesity has been recognized as the leading cause for the metabolic syndrome since it is strongly associated with all metabolic risk factors. High prevalence of the metabolic syndrome is not unique to the USA and Europe and it is also increasing in most Asian countries. Insulin resistance has elucidated most, if not all, of the pathophysiology of the metabolic syndrome because it contributes to hyperglycemia. Furthermore, a major contributor to the development of insulin resistance is an overabundance of circulating fatty acids. Plasma fatty acids are derived mainly from the triglycerides stored in adipose tissues, which are released through the action of the cyclic AMP-dependent enzyme, hormone sensitive lipase. This review summarizes the latest concepts in the definition, pathogenesis, pathophysiology, and diagnosis of the metabolic syndrome, as well as its preventive measures and therapeutic strategies in children and adolescents.

Association of anthropometric indicators to evaluate nutritional status and cardiometabolic risk in Mexican teenagers

Introduction

Introduction: anthropometric indicators (AIs) such as waist circumference (WC), body mass index (BMI), waist/hip index (WHpI), waist/height index (WHtI) and body fat percentage (BFP) are useful tools for the diagnosis of nutritional status (NS) in adolescents. Each of these parameters has advantages and disadvantages. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the association of these AIs (WC, BMI, WHpI, WHtI, and BFP) to evaluate nutritional status and estimate the cardiometabolic risk (CMR) in Mexican adolescents. Material and method: in a cross-sectional descriptive study, the NS was analyzed through various AIs and CMR with the WHtI criteria. Nine hundred and seventeen adolescents between 15 and 17 years old participated in the study, of whom 488 (52.9%) were female and 429 (47.1%) male, all students of middle school in Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Chiapas, Mexico. Results and conclusion: women presented a higher prevalence of obesity according to most indicators. The WHtI was the parameter that detected the highest prevalence of obesity (31%), correlating with the BMI and the BFP. Moreover, there was evidence of a significant relation between NS (assessed by all the anthropometric indicators) and CMR. The WHtI could be considered as an adequate tool for the diagnosis of obesity associated with CMR in adolescents.

Beyond insurance: race-based disparities in the use of metabolic and bariatric surgery for the management of severe pediatric obesity

BACKGROUND

It is unknown whether previously noted racial disparities in the use of metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) for the management of pediatric obesity could be mitigated by accounting for primary insurance.

OBJECTIVES

To examine utilization of pediatric MBS across race and insurance in the United States.

SETTING

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample was used to identify patients 12 to 19 years old undergoing MBS from 2015 to 2016, and these data were combined with national estimates of pediatric obesity obtained from the 2015 to 2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Severe obesity was defined as class III obesity, or class II obesity plus hypertension, dyslipidemia, or type 2 diabetes.

RESULTS

A total of 1,659,507 (5.0%) adolescents with severe obesity were identified, consisting of 35.0% female, 38.0% white, and 45.0% privately insured adolescents. Over the same time period, 2535 MBS procedures were performed. Most surgical patients were female (77.5%), white (52.8%), and privately insured (57.5%). Black and Hispanic adolescents were less likely to undergo MBS than whites (odds ratio .50, .46, respectively; P < .001 both), despite adjusting for primary insurance. White adolescents covered by Medicaid were significantly more likely to undergo MBS than their privately insured counterparts (odds ratio 1.66; P < .001), while the opposite was true for black and Hispanic adolescents (odds ratio .29, .75, respectively; P < .001 both).

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric obesity disproportionately affects racial minorities, yet MBS is most often performed on white adolescents. Medicaid insurance further decreases the use of MBS among nonwhite adolescents, while paradoxically increasing it for whites, suggesting expansion of government-sponsored insurance alone is unlikely to eliminate this race-based disparity.

Male gender is an independent risk factor for patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an MBSAQIP® database analysis

BACKGROUND

Male patients undergoing bariatric surgery have (historically) been considered higher risk than females. The aim of this study was to examine the disparity between genders undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) procedures and assess gender as an independent risk factor.

METHODS

The MBSAQIP® Data Registry Participant User Files for 2015-2017 was reviewed for patients having primary SG and RYGB. Patients were divided into groups based on gender and procedure. Variables for major complications were grouped together, including but not limited to PE, stroke, and MI. Univariate and propensity matching analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of 429,664 cases, 20.58% were male. Univariate analysis demonstrated males were older (46.48 ± 11.96 vs. 43.71 ± 11.89 years, p < 0.0001), had higher BMI (46.58 ± 8.46 vs. 45.05 ± 7.75 kg/m², p < 0.0001), and had higher incidence of comorbidities. Males had higher rates of major complications (1.72 vs. 1.05%; p < 0.0001) and 30-day mortality (0.18 vs. 0.07%, p < 0.0001). Significance was maintained after subgroup analysis of SG and RYGB. Propensity matched analysis demonstrated male gender was an independent risk factor for RYGB and SG, major complications [2.21 vs. 1.7%, p < 0.0001 (RYGB), 1.12 vs. 0.89%, p < 0.0001 (SG)], and mortality [0.23 vs. 0.12%, p < 0.0001 (RYGB), 0.10 vs. 0.05%; p < 0.0001 (SG)].

CONCLUSION

Males continue to represent a disproportionately small percentage of bariatric surgery patients despite having no difference in obesity rates compared to females. Male gender is an independent risk factor for major post-operative complications and 30-day mortality, even after controlling for comorbidities.

Disparities in Receipt of Bariatric Surgery in Canada: An Analysis of Data From an Ontario Bariatric Surgery Referral Center

BACKGROUND

Patients with lower socioeconomic status (SES) in the United States have reduced access to many health services including bariatric surgery. It is unclear whether disparities in bariatric surgery exist in countries with government-sponsored universal health benefits. The authors used data from a large regional Canadian bariatric surgery referral center to examine the relationship between SES and receipt of bariatric surgery.

METHODS

The Toronto Western Hospital bariatric surgery registry was used to identify all adults referred for bariatric surgery assessment from 2010 to 2017. The authors compared demographics, SES measures, and clinical measures among patients who did not and did undergo bariatric surgery (Roux-en-Y or sleeve gastrectomy). Multiple logistic regression was used to examine differences in receipt of bariatric surgery according to patient demographic characteristics and SES factors.

RESULTS

Among 2417 patients included in the study, 646 (26.7%) did not receive surgery and 1771 patients (73.2%) did. Patients who did not undergo surgery were more likely to be male individual (29.1% vs. 19.3%; P<0.001), black (12.1% vs. 8.3%; P=0.005), South Asian/Middle Eastern (8.2% vs. 4.5%; P<0.001), and less likely to be white (68.9% vs. 76.7%; P<0.001). In multiple logistic regression, factors associated with not receiving surgery were male sex, Black and South Asian/Middle Eastern ethnicity, being single, lack of employment, and history of psychiatric illness.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients referred for bariatric surgery, those who were male individuals, nonwhite, single, and unemployed were less likely to undergo surgery. Our results suggest that even with equal insurance, there are disparities in receipt of bariatric surgery.