1
|
Hahn EE, Munoz-Plaza CE, Jensen CD, Ghai NR, Pak K, Amundsen BI, Contreras R, Cannizzaro N, Chubak J, Green BB, Skinner CS, Halm EA, Schottinger JE, Levin TR. Patterns of Care Following a Positive Fecal Blood Test for Colorectal Cancer: A Mixed Methods Study. J Gen Intern Med 2024:10.1007/s11606-024-08764-0. [PMID: 38771535 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-08764-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE Multilevel barriers to colonoscopy after a positive fecal blood test for colorectal cancer (CRC) are well-documented. A less-explored barrier to appropriate follow-up is repeat fecal testing after a positive test. We investigated this phenomenon using mixed methods. DESIGN This sequential mixed methods study included quantitative data from a large cohort of patients 50-89 years from four healthcare systems with a positive fecal test 2010-2018 and qualitative data from interviews with physicians and patients. MAIN MEASURES Logistic regression was used to evaluate whether repeat testing was associated with failure to complete subsequent colonoscopy and to identify factors associated with repeat testing. Interviews were coded and analyzed to explore reasons for repeat testing. KEY RESULTS A total of 316,443 patients had a positive fecal test. Within 1 year, 76.3% received a colonoscopy without repeat fecal testing, 3% repeated testing and then received a colonoscopy, 4.4% repeated testing without colonoscopy, and 16.3% did nothing. Among repeat testers (7.4% of total cohort, N = 23,312), 59% did not receive a colonoscopy within 1 year. In adjusted models, those with an initial positive test followed by a negative second test were significantly less likely to receive colonoscopy than those with two successive positive tests (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.35-0.40). Older age (65-75 vs. 50-64 years: OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.33-1.41) and higher comorbidity score (≥ 4 vs. 0: OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.67-1.83) were significantly associated with repeat testing compared to those who received colonoscopy without repeat tests. Qualitative interview data revealed reasons underlying repeat testing, including colonoscopy avoidance, bargaining, and disbelief of positive results. CONCLUSIONS Among patients in this cohort, 7.4% repeated fecal testing after an initial positive test. Of those, over half did not go on to receive a colonoscopy within 1 year. Efforts to improve CRC screening must address repeat fecal testing after a positive test as a barrier to completing colonoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin E Hahn
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA.
- Department of Health Systems Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA.
| | - Corrine E Munoz-Plaza
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | | | - Nirupa R Ghai
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Katherine Pak
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Britta I Amundsen
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Richard Contreras
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Nancy Cannizzaro
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Jessica Chubak
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Beverly B Green
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Celette Sugg Skinner
- Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Ethan A Halm
- Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Joanne E Schottinger
- Department of Health Systems Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Theodore R Levin
- Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, CA, USA
- Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Walnut Creek, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Murphy AL, Turner JP, Rajda M, Allen KG, Gardner DM. Prescriber Acceptability of a Direct-to-Patient Intervention for Benzodiazepine Receptor Agonist Deprescribing and Behavioural Management of Insomnia in Older Adults. Can J Aging 2024:1-9. [PMID: 38456246 DOI: 10.1017/s0714980824000114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Behavioural treatments are recommended first-line for insomnia, but long-term benzodiazepine receptor agonist (BZRA) use remains common and engaging patients in a deprescribing consultation is challenging. Few deprescribing interventions directly target patients. Prescribers' support of patient-targeted interventions may facilitate their uptake. Recently assessed in the Your Answers When Needing Sleep in New Brunswick (YAWNS NB) study, Sleepwell (mysleepwell.ca) was developed as a direct-to-patient behaviour change intervention promoting BZRA deprescribing and non-pharmacological insomnia management. BZRA prescribers of YAWNS NB participants were invited to complete an online survey assessing the acceptability of Sleepwell as a direct-to-patient intervention. The survey was developed using the seven construct components of the theoretical framework of acceptability (TFA) framework. Respondents (40/250, 17.2%) indicated high acceptability, with positive responses per TFA construct averaging 32.3/40 (80.7%). Perceived as an ethical, credible, and useful tool, Sleepwell also promoted prescriber-patient BZRA deprescribing engagements (11/19, 58%). Prescribers were accepting of Sleepwell and supported its application as a direct-to-patient intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea L Murphy
- College of Pharmacy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Justin P Turner
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Science, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre de recherche, Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Malgorzata Rajda
- Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
- Sleep Disorders Clinic and Laboratory, QEII Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Kathleen G Allen
- Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - David M Gardner
- College of Pharmacy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Robinson M, Mokrzecki S, Mallett AJ. Attitudes and barriers towards deprescribing in older patients experiencing polypharmacy: a narrative review. NPJ AGING 2024; 10:6. [PMID: 38263176 PMCID: PMC10806180 DOI: 10.1038/s41514-023-00132-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
Polypharmacy, commonly defined as ≥5 medications, is a rising public health concern due to its many risks of harm. One commonly recommended strategy to address polypharmacy is medication reviews, with subsequent deprescription of inappropriate medications. In this review, we explore the intersection of older age, polypharmacy, and deprescribing in a contemporary context by appraising the published literature (2012-2022) to identify articles that included new primary data on deprescribing medications in patients aged ≥65 years currently taking ≥5 medications. We found 31 articles were found which describe the current perceptions of clinicians towards deprescribing, the identified barriers, key enabling factors, and future directions in approaching deprescribing. Currently, clinicians believe that deprescribing is a complex process, and despite the majority of clinicians reporting feeling comfortable in deprescribing, fewer engage with this process regularly. Common barriers cited include a lack of knowledge and training around the deprescribing process, a lack of time, a breakdown in communication, perceived 'abandonment of care', fear of adverse consequences, and resistance from patients and/or their carers. Common enabling factors of deprescribing include recognition of key opportunities to instigate this process, regular medication reviews, improving lines of communication, education of both patients and clinicians and a multidisciplinary approach towards patient care. Addressing polypharmacy requires a nuanced approach in a generally complex group of patients. Key strategies to reducing the risks of polypharmacy include education of patients and clinicians, in addition to improving communication between healthcare providers in a multidisciplinary approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Robinson
- Townsville Institute of Health Research and Innovation, Townsville University Hospital, Douglas, QLD, Australia
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Douglas, QLD, Australia
| | - Sophie Mokrzecki
- Townsville Institute of Health Research and Innovation, Townsville University Hospital, Douglas, QLD, Australia
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Douglas, QLD, Australia
- Department of Pharmacy, Townsville University Hospital, Douglas, QLD, Australia
| | - Andrew J Mallett
- Townsville Institute of Health Research and Innovation, Townsville University Hospital, Douglas, QLD, Australia.
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Douglas, QLD, Australia.
- Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Norton JD, Zeng C, Bayliss EA, Shetterly SM, Williams N, Reeve E, Wynia MK, Green AR, Drace ML, Gleason KS, Sheehan OC, Boyd CM. Ethical Aspects of Physician Decision-Making for Deprescribing Among Older Adults With Dementia. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2336728. [PMID: 37787993 PMCID: PMC10548310 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.36728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Physicians endorse deprescribing of risky or unnecessary medications for older adults (aged ≥65 years) with dementia, but there is a lack of information on what influences decisions to deprescribe in this population. Objective To understand how physicians make decisions to deprescribe for older adults with moderate dementia and ethical and pragmatic concerns influencing those decisions. Design, Setting, and Participants A cross-sectional national mailed survey study of a random sample of 3000 primary care physicians from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile who care for older adults was conducted from January 15 to December 31, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures The study randomized participants to consider 2 clinical scenarios in which a physician may decide to deprescribe a medication for older adults with moderate dementia: 1 in which the medication could cause an adverse drug event if continued and the other in which there is no evidence of benefit. Participants ranked 9 factors related to possible ethical and pragmatic concerns through best-worst scaling methods (from greatest barrier to smallest barrier to deprescribing). Conditional logit regression quantified the relative importance for each factor as a barrier to deprescribing. Results A total of 890 physicians (35.0%) returned surveys; 511 (57.4%) were male, and the mean (SD) years since graduation was 26.0 (11.7). Most physicians had a primary specialty in family practice (50.4% [449 of 890]) and internal medicine (43.5% [387 of 890]). A total of 689 surveys were sufficiently complete to analyze. In both clinical scenarios, the 2 greatest barriers to deprescribing were (1) the patient or family reporting symptomatic benefit from the medication (beneficence and autonomy) and (2) the medication having been prescribed by another physician (autonomy and nonmaleficence). The least influential factor was ease of paying for the medication (justice). Conclusions and Relevance Findings from this national survey study of primary care physicians suggests that understanding ethical aspects of physician decision-making can inform clinician education about medication management and deprescribing decisions for older adults with moderate dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chan Zeng
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora
| | - Elizabeth A. Bayliss
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
| | | | - Nicole Williams
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Emily Reeve
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Matthew K. Wynia
- University of Colorado Center for Bioethics and Humanities, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora
| | - Ariel R. Green
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Melanie L. Drace
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora
| | - Kathy S. Gleason
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora
| | | | - Cynthia M. Boyd
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van Poelgeest E, van der Velde N. A themed journal issue on (de)prescribing dilemmas in older, multimorbid adults with increased fall risk. Eur Geriatr Med 2023; 14:645-648. [PMID: 37542645 DOI: 10.1007/s41999-023-00845-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Eveline van Poelgeest
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Nathalie van der Velde
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Monette PJ, Schwartz AW. Optimizing Medications with the Geriatrics 5Ms: An Age-Friendly Approach. Drugs Aging 2023; 40:391-396. [PMID: 37043166 PMCID: PMC10092911 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-023-01016-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/19/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2023]
Abstract
Polypharmacy is a common problem among older adults, as they are more likely to have multiple chronic conditions and may experience fragmentation of care among specialists. The Geriatrics 5Ms framework offers a person-centered approach to address polypharmacy and optimize medications, including deprescribing when appropriate. The elements of the Geriatrics 5Ms, which align with the approach of the Age-Friendly Health Systems initiative, include consideration of Medications, Mind, Mobility, Multicomplexity, and What Matters Most. Each M domain impacts and is impacted by medications, and learning about the patient's goals through questions guided by the Geriatrics 5Ms may inform an Age-Friendly medication optimization plan. While research on the implementation of each of the elements of the Geriatrics 5Ms shows benefit, further research is needed to study the impact of this framework in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrea Wershof Schwartz
- Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
- New England Geriatrics Research Education and Clinical Center and Geriatrics and Extended Care, VA Boston Healthcare System, and Brigham and Women's Hospital, 150 South Huntington #182, Boston, MA, 02130, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ie K, Machino R, Albert SM, Tomita S, Kushibuchi M, Hirose M, Matsuda T, Okuse C, Ohira Y. Deprescribing as an Opportunity to Facilitate Patient-Centered Care: A Qualitative Study of General Practitioners and Pharmacists in Japan. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:3543. [PMID: 36834238 PMCID: PMC9962748 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20043543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Revised: 02/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Deprescribing has recently been applied to address polypharmacy, particularly among older adults. However, the characteristics of deprescribing that are likely to improve health outcomes have not been well studied. This study explored the experiences and perspectives of general practitioners and pharmacists with regard to deprescribing in older adults with multimorbidity. A qualitative study was conducted involving eight semi-structured focus group interviews with 35 physicians and pharmacists from hospitals, clinics, and community pharmacies. Thematic analysis was applied to identify themes using the theory of planned behavior as a guide. The results illustrated a metacognitive process, as well as influencing factors, through which healthcare providers commit to shared decision making for deprescribing. Healthcare providers acted on the basis of their attitudes and beliefs on deprescribing, the influence of subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control for deprescribing. These processes are influenced by factors such as drug class, prescribers, patients, deprescribing experience, and environment/education. Healthcare providers' attitudes, beliefs, and behavioral control (along with deprescribing strategies) evolve in a dynamic interplay with experience, environment, and education. Our results can serve as a foundation for the development of effective patient-centered deprescribing to improve the safety of pharmaceutical care for older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenya Ie
- Department of General Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki 214-8525, Japan
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Kawasaki Municipal Tama Hospital, Kawasaki 214-8525, Japan
- Department of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15621, USA
| | - Reiko Machino
- Department of General Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki 214-8525, Japan
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Kawasaki Municipal Tama Hospital, Kawasaki 214-8525, Japan
| | - Steven M. Albert
- Department of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15621, USA
| | - Shiori Tomita
- Tama Family Clinic, Kawasaki 214-0013, Japan
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan
| | - Mio Kushibuchi
- Department of General Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki 214-8525, Japan
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Kawasaki Municipal Tama Hospital, Kawasaki 214-8525, Japan
| | - Masanori Hirose
- Department of General Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki 214-8525, Japan
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Kawasaki Municipal Tama Hospital, Kawasaki 214-8525, Japan
| | - Takahide Matsuda
- Department of General Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki 214-8525, Japan
| | - Chiaki Okuse
- Department of General Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki 214-8525, Japan
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Kawasaki Municipal Tama Hospital, Kawasaki 214-8525, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Ohira
- Department of General Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki 214-8525, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Development and Validation of Comprehensive Healthcare Providers' Opinions, Preferences, and Attitudes towards Deprescribing (CHOPPED Questionnaire). PHARMACY 2022; 10:pharmacy10040076. [PMID: 35893715 PMCID: PMC9326567 DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy10040076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Revised: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Successful implementation of deprescribing requires exploring healthcare professionals’ opinions, preferences, and attitudes towards deprescribing. The aim of this study was to develop and validate the questionnaire exploring healthcare providers’ opinions preferences and attitudes towards deprescribing (CHOPPED questionnaire). This was a cross-sectional on-line survey. A comprehensive 58-item questionnaire, in two versions (for pharmacists and physicians), was developed through an extensive literature review and interviews with experts. The questionnaire was validated, and its reliability was assessed through data collected from 356 pharmacists and 109 physicians. Exploratory factor analysis was performed, and 37- and 35-item questionnaires were developed. Ten factors were identified: knowledge, awareness, patient barriers and facilitators, competencies barriers and facilitators, collaboration barriers and facilitators, and healthcare system barriers and facilitators. The CHOPPED tool has satisfactory face, content (CVR > 0.62) (content validity ratio), construct, and criterion validity. The reliability statistics of all factors in both versions was acceptable with Cronbach’s alpha > 0.6. Test−retest reliability analysis showed that gamma rank correlations of total factor scores were strong and very strong (between 0.519 and 0.938). The CHOPPED tool can be used as a valid and reliable tool to explore healthcare providers’ opinions and attitudes toward discontinuing medications in the primary care setting in Croatia.
Collapse
|
9
|
Fischer H, Hahn EE, Li BH, Munoz-Plaza CE, Luong TQ, Harrison TN, Slezak JM, Sim JJ, Mittman BS, Lee EA, Singh H, Kanter MH, Reynolds K, Danforth KN. Potentially Harmful Medication Dispenses After a Fall or Hip Fracture: A Mixed Methods Study of a Commonly Used Quality Measure. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2022; 48:222-232. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2022.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
10
|
Steinman MA, Boyd CM, Spar MJ, Norton JD, Tannenbaum C. Deprescribing and deimplementation: Time for transformative change. J Am Geriatr Soc 2021; 69:3693-3695. [PMID: 34499742 PMCID: PMC8649037 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Revised: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Steinman
- Division of Geriatrics, University of California San Francisco and the San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Cynthia M Boyd
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Malena J Spar
- Division of Geriatrics, University of California San Francisco and the San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jonathan D Norton
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Cara Tannenbaum
- Faculties of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Montreal and the Canadian Institutes for Health Research, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|