The osteoporosis treatment gap in Switzerland between 1998 and 2018

Differences in femoral fracture localizations in men and women in Switzerland between 1998 and 2021-reversal of the secular trend?

Number and age-standardized incidences of femoral fractures by sex and localization were determined annually between 1998 and 2021 in subjects aged 45 years or older living in Switzerland. The number and incidences of femoral neck, pertrochanteric, subtrochanteric, and femoral shaft fractures followed distinct unexpected trend patterns.

INTRODUCTION

Long-term incidence trends for femoral fractures by individual localizations are unknown.

METHODS

Annual absolute number of hospitalizations and median age at hospital admission between 1998 and 2021 were extracted from the medical database of the Swiss Federal Office of Statistics by sex and 10-year age groups for the following 10th International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes: femoral neck (ICD-10 S72.0), pertrochanteric (S72.1), subtrochanteric (S72.2), and femoral shaft fractures (S72.3). Age-standardized incidence rates (ASI) and corresponding trends were calculated.

RESULTS

Over 24 years, the number of femoral neck fractures increased in men (+ 45%) but decreased in women (- 7%) with ASI significantly decreasing by 20% and 37% (p < 0.001 for trend for both), respectively. By contrast, the number of pertrochanteric fractures increased by 67% and 45% in men and women, respectively, corresponding to a horizontal ASI-trend in men (n.s.) and a modest significant decreasing ASI-trend in women (p < 0.001). The number of subtrochanteric fractures increased in both sexes with corresponding modest significant reductions in ASI-trends (p = 0.015 and 0.002, respectively). Femoral shaft fractures almost doubled in men (+ 71%) and doubled in women (+ 100%) with corresponding significant increases in ASI-trends (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Age at admission increased for all fracture localizations, more so in men than in women and more so for subtrochanteric and shaft fractures than for "typical" hip fractures.

CONCLUSION

Incidence changes of pertrochanteric fractures and femoral shaft fractures deserve increased attention, especially in men. Pooling diagnostic codes for defining hip fractures may hide differing patterns by localization and sex.

Evolving trends in hip fracture patterns among the elderly from 2001 to 2022

INTRODUCTION

Hip fractures among the elderly exhibit diverse patterns. Differences regarding treatment and prognosis of displaced versus undisplaced intracapsular fractures are well established. Unstable extracapsular fractures are associated with considerably higher rates of complications than stable fractures, including cutout failures, non-unions, wound complications and hardware related problems. The purpose of this study was to identify trends in the distribution of various types of hip fractures and their complexity between 2001 and 2022.

METHODS

This retrospective study compared hip fractures treated in the years 2001, 2006, 2010, 2014, 2018, and 2022, excluding patients under 60 years old and those with pathological or peri‑prosthetic fractures. Radiographs were reviewed and fracture patterns were categorized as stable extracapsular, unstable extracapsular, subtrochanteric or intracapsular.

RESULTS

Out of 2646 patients admitted with proximal femoral fractures during these years, 2277 patients (69.5 % women) were available for analysis. Over the initial decade, the mean patient age gradually increased from 80 to 82, subsequently stabilizing. Gender distribution remained consistent, and the proportion of intracapsular fractures showed minimal variation (36-38 %). The most significant finding was the marked decrease in the proportion of stable-to-unstable extracapsular fractures during the first decade from 51 % to 31 %, followed by stabilization after 2010. Subgroup analysis by age revealed that while the proportion change between stable and unstable fractures remained insignificant in younger age groups (p = 0.41 for sexagenarians and 0.12 for septuagenarians), a significant change was observed in older patients (p = 0.002 for octogenarians and 0.04 for nonagenarians and older patients).

DISCUSSION

This study reveals a surge in unstable peritrochanteric fractures between 2001 and 2010, particularly pronounced in patients over 80. This trend plateaued in the following decade, aligning with the stabilization of the cohort's mean age at 82. Numerous factors, from bone morphology to systemic markers, influence hip fracture types. Evolutions in osteoporosis screening and treatment over the last three decades may have contributed to the observed shifts in fracture pattern distribution.

CONCLUSION

Understanding these trends enriches treatment strategies and underscores the need for further exploration of the interplay between demographic and anatomical factors in the etiology of specific fracture patterns.