Gastric Bypass for Obesity in the Elderly: Is It as Appropriate as for Young and Middle-Aged Populations?

Obesity Surgery Mortality Risk Score as a Predictor for Intensive Care Unit Admission in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery

Background: Laparoscopic bariatric surgery provides many benefits including lower postoperative pain scores, reduced opioid consumption, shorter hospital stays, and improved quality of recovery. However, the anaesthetic management of obese patients requires caution in determining postoperative risk and in planning adequate postoperative pathways. Currently, there are no specific indications for intensive care unit (ICU) admission in this surgical population and most decisions are made on a case-by-case basis. The aim of this study is to investigate whether Obesity Surgery Mortality Risk Score (OS-MRS) is able to predict ICU admission in patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery (LBS). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data of patients who underwent LBS during a 2-year period (2017-2019). The collected data included demographics, comorbidities and surgery-related variables. Postoperative ICU admission was decided via bariatric anaesthesiologists' evaluations, based on the high risk of postoperative cardiac or respiratory complications. Anaesthesia protocol was standardized. Logistic regression was used for statistical analysis. Results: ICU admission was required in 2% (n = 15) of the 763 patients. The intermediate risk group of the OS-MRS was detected in 84% of patients, while the American Society of Anaesthesiologists class III was reported in 80% of patients. A greater OS-MRS (p = 0.01), advanced age (p = 0.04), male gender (p = 0.001), longer duration of surgery (p = 0.0001), increased number of patient comorbidities (p = 0.002), and previous abdominal surgeries (p = 0.003) were predictive factors for ICU admission. Conclusions: ICU admission in obese patients undergoing LBS is predicted by OS-MRS together with age, male gender, number of comorbidities, previous abdominal surgeries, and duration of surgery.

Is Sleeve Gastrectomy as Effective in Older Patients as in Younger Patients? A Comparative Analysis of Weight Loss, Related Comorbidities, and Medication Requirements

Background

Bariatric surgery in the older population has been the subject of ongoing debate but several studies have recently demonstrated its short-term advantages in this age group. It is not yet clear, however, whether these benefits are long-lasting.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients with morbid obesity who underwent laparoscopy sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). These patients were divided into two groups: those above 60 years of age (older group) and those of 60 years or under (younger group). Variables evaluated included demographics and anthropometrics data, comorbidities, and daily medication requirements.

Results

Two hundred fifty-two patients underwent LSG, 57 in the older group and 195 in the younger group. Outcomes related to weight loss in the older subjects were modest compared to those in the younger population (older group %EWL 41.6 vs younger group %EWL 51.1, p < 0.05, older group %TWL 24.9% vs younger group %TWL 25.2%, p < 0.05). During follow-up, both older and younger patients showed an improvement in all the comorbidities: hypertension (older 82.5% vs 38.1%, younger 52.6% vs 29.2%, p < 0.05), type 2 diabetes mellitus (older 38.6% vs 27.3%, 34.9% vs 23.9%, p < 0.05), hyperlipidemia (older 75.4% vs 42.9%, younger 35.9% vs 21.1%, p < 0.05), and OSAHS (older 57.9% vs 30%, younger 40.4% vs 7.1%, p < 0.05). The average number of daily medications used to manage comorbidities decreased in both groups.

Conclusion

LSG in older patients is effective in terms of weight loss, improvement of comorbidities, and lower daily medication requirements up to 5 years of follow-up.

Graphical abstract

Bariatric surgery outcomes: is age just a number?

INTRODUCTION

Obesity and its associated comorbidities represent a pervasive problem in the United States across all age groups. There are conflicting data regarding the effectiveness and postoperative recovery of bariatric surgery in elderly patients. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of bariatric surgery across age groups.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After obtaining institutional review board approval, patients with morbid obesity who underwent non-revisional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) at our institution between 2011 and 2015 were included in this retrospective study. Patients were subdivided into five age groups: < 30, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, and ≥ 60 years. Patient baseline demographics and comorbidities were collected. Postoperative outcomes including reinterventions/reoperations, 30-day-readmissions, 90-day-mortality, comorbidities' resolution, and change in BMI (ΔBMI) up to 4 years were recorded and compared. The groups were compared with ANOVA and chi-square tests and multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

LRYGB was performed in 74.7% of the 1026 study patients. Patients ≥ 60 years old demonstrated lower preoperative BMI than patients < 50 years (p < 0.001). Patients 50-59 years old had increased length of stay compared to 30-39 (p = 0.003) and a higher prevalence of all comorbidities was found in older patients (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in 30-day-readmissions; 90-day-mortality; reoperations; and reinterventions among the study groups. The ΔBMI was higher in younger patients and comorbidity resolution was more likely in younger patients with the exception of obstructive sleep apnea.

CONCLUSION

Bariatric surgery can be accomplished safely across all age groups with satisfiable postoperative weight loss. However, older age had higher hospital stay and convalescence and lower comorbidity resolution compared to younger patients. Thus, bariatric surgery should be offered earlier in life to allow the patients to reap its benefits.

Long-Term Weight Loss, Metabolic Outcomes, and Quality of Life at 10 Years After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Are Independent of Patients' Age at Baseline

BACKGROUND

Conflicting data have been published for bariatric surgery in older patients, with no long-term large-scale studies available. Our aim was to provide long-term (> 10 years) results on weight loss, metabolic outcomes, and quality of life in a large homogenous series of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) patients, according to age at baseline.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All consecutive patients who underwent primary RYGB between 1999 and 2007, and therefore eligible for 10-year follow-up, were retrospectively analyzed. According to their age at baseline, they were divided into three groups: A (< 40 years), B (40-54 years), and C (≥ 55 years). Categorical variables were compared with the χ² test and continuous variables with ANOVA.

RESULTS

Our series consisted of 820 patients, with a 10-year follow-up of 80.6%. Although group C (11% of all patients) had significantly more comorbidities at baseline, there was no difference in postoperative morbidity and mortality between groups. Weight loss was significantly less for group C patients up to the 7th postoperative year, but no difference remained thereafter. 10-year %total weight loss was 32.2, 32.9, and 32.3 respectively in groups A, B, and C. After 10 years, glycemic control and lipid profile improved similarly, rates of partial or complete remission of diabetes and hypertension were identical, and quality of life presented a significant improvement for all patients with no inter-group difference.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest similar short- and long-term outcomes after RYGB for patients ≥ 55 years compared to younger ones; the relative benefit might even be higher for older patients, given their increased comorbidity at baseline.

Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in the Elderly: 1-Year Preliminary Outcomes in a Randomized Trial (BASE Trial)

PURPOSE

Despite the increasing prevalence of elderly obese patients, bariatric surgery remains controversial in this population. Recent publications have focused on perioperative safety, but few studies have addressed clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate 1-year outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) compared to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in patients 65 years or older.

METHODS

Thirty-six elderly obese patients were recruited for an open-label randomized trial from September 2017 to May 2019, comparing LSG to LRYGB. One-year outcomes were evaluated based on weight loss, functionality, and control of clinical conditions.

RESULTS

The median age (67 × 67 years; p=0.67) and initial body mass index (BMI) (46.3 × 51.3 kg/m²; p=0.28) were similar between groups. Preoperative BMI (after weight loss pre-operative treatment) was higher in LRYGB group (41.9 × 47.6 kg/m²; p= 0.03). After 12 months, EWL and TWL were higher in LRYGB group (60 × 68%; p=0.04; 24.9 × 31.4%; p<0.01). HbA1c reduction was higher after LRYGB (-1.1 × -0.5%; p<0.01) as well as LDL control (-27.5 × +11.5 mg/dL p= 0.02). No difference was noted between LRYGB and LSG concerning hypertension control, triglycerides, HDL, and functionality.

CONCLUSION

Weight loss, diabetes, and LDL control were better achieved with LRYGB after 12 months.

Is Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery Safe and Effective in Patients over 60 Years of Age?" an Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

To evaluate, mid-term outcomes between elderly patients (EP, i.e., age > 60 years old) and young patients (YP, i.e., age < = 60 years old) who underwent laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Studies comparing EP versus YP for bariatric surgery published until April 2020 were selected and submitted to a systematic review and meta-analysis. After LSG, overall morbidity and specific post-operative complication rates (i.e., leak, abscess, hemorrhage, and reoperation) were significantly more frequent in EP compared with those in YP. Surgical outcomes were similar between EP and YP after LRYGB. Both procedures achieved weight loss, but it was statistically greater in YP compared with that in EP. In summary, this meta-analysis suggests that laparoscopic bariatric surgery is a safe and effective treatment in EP compared with that in YP.

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Patients >60 Years of Age: Morbidity and Short-Term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a common disease in the elderly population, and bariatric surgery is the most effective intervention to achieve significant and sustainable weight loss. Many bariatric programs have established an arbitrary cutoff at the age of 60 to 65 years. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and short-term outcomes of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in patients older than 60 years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent RYGB from 2004 to 2019 in a single center. Logistic and linear multivariate regressions were made to compare complications and short-term outcomes between patients aged > 60 years and < 60 years. The statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05.

RESULTS

From 849 patients who underwent a primary RYGB, 57 were > 60 years of age. Overall, early and late complications were similar in both groups, except for unexpected intensive care unit (ICU) admission which was more frequent in the > 60 years group. Excess body weight loss (%EWL) and percentage total weight loss (%TWL) at 1 year in patients > 60 years old were 76.6 ± 21.8% and 30.73 ± 6.8%, respectively. Figures for the same parameters in the control group were 81.7 ± 19.9% (p = 0.09) and 34.3 ± 7.2 (p = 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, an age > 60 is not related to higher rates of overall early and late complications after RYGB. Comorbidity remission rates are similar to those in younger patients. Elderly patients had lower total weight loss at 1 year, but the %EWL was similar in both groups.

One-year outcomes of bariatric surgery in older adults: a case-matched analysis based on the Tehran Obesity Treatment Study

PURPOSE

Knowledge is limited about the efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes of bariatric surgery in older adult patients with obesity.

METHODS

Fifty-six patients aged ≥ 60 years who underwent bariatric surgery, as either sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass, were matched for sex, baseline body mass index (BMI) and surgery type, with 112 younger controls, aged 18-60 years. We compared complications, weight loss, resolution of co-morbidities, and changes in body composition status (fat mass [FM], fat-free mass [FFM], lean mass [LM] and percentage of fat mass [FM%]) 12 months postoperatively between the groups.

RESULTS

Complications were similar in the two groups. Diabetes mellitus (DM) and dyslipidemia showed similar remission and improvement rates postoperatively in the two groups. Remission from hypertension (HTN) was higher in the control group, but improvement rates were similar. Changes from baseline to 12 months postoperatively in weight, BMI, excess weight loss (EWL%), total weight loss (TWL%), FFM, and LM were greater in the control group than in the older-age group. Changes in FM and FM% were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Bariatric surgery is a safe intervention for the management of obesity and obesity-related co-morbidities in older adults, with similar surgery-risk and complication rates to those of younger adults. Reduction in FM and FM% was equal in two groups and the concern about greater LM loss in older adults seems unfounded.

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in the elderly: is age a determining factor in our outcomes?

BACKGROUND

While patients are becoming older and the prevalence of obesity increases worldwide, literature on the impact of age on outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is scarce. The balance between surgical risks and clinical benefits of LRYGB are unclear in relation to age.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of age on the risk of postoperative complications, postoperative weight loss, and remission of co-morbidities for patients who underwent LRYGB.

SETTING

A high-volume center for bariatric surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 582 patients who underwent LRYGB was performed. Linear logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the potential impact of age on the postoperative percentage of total weight loss (%TWL). Multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate whether age was independently associated with the risk of postoperative complications and likelihood of remission of co-morbidities (hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia). In addition, these outcomes were descriptively analyzed for the following 3 age groups: the young (18-39 yr), the middle aged (40-59 yr), and the elderly (≥60 yr).

RESULTS

Patients with hypertension were more prone to developing postoperative complications (odds ratio 2.435, 95% confidence interval: 1.241-4.777) and no other factors were found to be associated with the risk of postoperative complications. Older age was significantly associated with lower %TWL at a postoperative follow-up of 6 (ß = -.117, P = .004), 12 (ß = -.177, P < .001), and 36 months (ß = -.169, P = .001), but not at 60 months (ß = -.097, P = .161). Nonetheless, a %TWL of 30% was observed in patients who were >60 years at the time of surgery. Age was not associated with the likelihood of co-morbidity resolution after LRYGB. The remission of hypertension was less likely in patients with co-existence of diabetes (odds ratio .334, 95% confidence interval: .136-.821) and in patients with a longer length of postoperative follow-up (odds ratio .982, 95% confidence interval: .966-.998).

CONCLUSIONS

Although older age seems to be associated with lower postoperative %TWL, elderly patients can still achieve a %TWL of 30% after LRYGB. In this study, age was not found to be an independent predictor of postoperative complications nor the likelihood of co-morbidity resolution. Therefore, older age alone should not be an absolute contraindication for LRYGB.

Safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic Y-en-Roux gastric bypass surgery in obese elderly patients

Purpose

To analyze, in aged obese patients, the weight loss, comorbidity control, and safety postoperative complications of bariatric surgery by Roux-en-Y gastric bypass technique.

Methods

Twenty-seven patients who underwent laparoscopic weight-reducing gastroplasty with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass to treat obesity were included. All patients were ≥ 60 years old at the time of surgery. The Wilcoxon test was used for statistical analysis, and a p-value ≤0.05it was considered significant.

Results

Ten (90.9%) patients with dyslipidemia were cured (p < 0.001). Nine (81.8%) patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus had total improvement and 2 (18.2%) had partial improvement (p = 0.003). In 23 patients with systemic arterial hypertension, 9 (39.1%) achieved total improvement and 14 (60.9%) partial improvement (p = 0.140). Five (71.4%) patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome were cured (p = <0.001). For other comorbidities, no partial improvement or cure was shown.

Conclusions

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery in obese elderly patients can be performed safely and with low morbidity and mortality rates. The benefits of weight loss and reduced comorbidities are promising and like those of the younger population.

Changes in Body Composition, Comorbidities, and Nutritional Status Associated with Lower Weight Loss After Bariatric Surgery in Older Subjects

BACKGROUND

To provide greater insight into bariatric surgery outcomes in aging patients, we compared changes in body weight, body composition, obesity-related comorbidities, and nutritional status between older and younger subjects.

METHODS

We analyzed data collected between January 2004 and December 2014 from our prospective bariatric cohort. Older patients (OP, ≥ 60 years at the time of surgery, n = 93; 66% Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, 34% sleeve gastrectomy) were compared with younger patients (YP, < 60 years, n = 186), matched 1:2 on sex, body mass index, diabetes, and surgical procedure. Body composition was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

RESULTS

Weight loss and excess weight loss at 12 months were lower in OP vs. YP (mean ± SD, 30.1 ± 10.1 vs. 34.1 ± 11.9 kg, 60.6 ± 21.2 vs. 66.8 ± 23.4%, respectively, p < 0.05 for both). Both lean body mass and fat mass loss were lower in OP vs. YP (8.4 ± 3.4 vs. 9.2 ± 9.0 kg, 19.4 ± 8.7 vs. 21.9 ± 9.1 kg, respectively, p < 0.05). The remission rate for type 2 diabetes was significantly lower in OP vs. YP (24 vs. 45%), as well as improvement in hypertension (14 vs. 46%), dyslipidemia (27 vs. 47%), and knee pain. There was no difference in micronutrient deficiencies between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that although bariatric surgery is not as effective for weight loss in older as in younger subjects, it is a safe option regarding a comprehensive set of nutritional variables which enables significant improvement in obesity-related outcomes.

Effectiveness and Safety of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Elderly Patients-Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

As the population ages, there is more interest in bariatric surgery for older patients. There are controversies regarding the safety and effectiveness of surgical weight loss in this population.

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients over the age of 60 years with younger patients.

METHODS

The available literature was searched for eligible studies up to February 2018. Inclusion criteria were reports on mortality, morbidity, percentage excess weight loss (%EWL), remission of diabetes, remission of hypertension, and remission of obstructive sleep apnea. Random effects meta-analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 2000 references. The final meta-analysis involved nine studies and revealed significant differences in mortality (odds ratio 4.38, 95% confidence interval [1.25, 15.31], p = 0.02), morbidity (OR 1.88, CI [1.07, 3.30], p = 0.03), %EWL (mean difference - 5.86, 95% CI [- 9.15, - 2.56], p < 0.001), and remission of comorbidities.

CONCLUSION

Higher mortality and morbidity were found in the group of older patients. The analysis suggested lower effectiveness of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for weight loss and improvement in comorbidity in older patients when compared with younger patients.

Incidence, Indications, and Predictive Factors for ICU Admission in Elderly, High-Risk Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Obesity affects the elderly, leading to increased prevalence of age- and obesity-associated comorbidities. There are no guidelines for indications and risk assessment for the elderly undergoing bariatric surgery.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the incidence, indications, and outcomes of planned ICU admission in elderly, high-risk patients after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and to assess if preoperative risk factors for planned postoperative ICU admission in elderly patients undergoing LSG could be predicted preoperatively.

METHODS

Retrospective review of prospectively collected data for all patients aged ≥ 60 years who underwent LSG (2011-2016) at Hamad General Hospital in Qatar.

RESULTS

We followed up 58 patients aged 60-75 years for 28 ± 17 months. About 77.6% of patients were in the intermediate-risk group of the Obesity Surgery Mortality Risk Score (OS-MRS). Fourteen patients (24%) required ICU admission for 2 ± 1.2 days; all patients belonged to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) III class and intermediate to high risk on OS-MRS. There were no reported mortalities. The mean body mass index (BMI) decreased from 49 ± 10.6 to 37.6 ± 10.1 kg/m². The number of patient comorbidities (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.03-1.99) and the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA; OR, 7.8; 95% CI, 1.92-31.68) were associated with planned ICU admission.

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients undergoing LSG usually have excellent postoperative course despite the associated high risk and the required ICU admission. The number of comorbidities, diagnosis of OSA, and ASA score are possible clinically significant predictive factors for the need of post-LSG ICU admission.

Trends in Early Morbidity and Mortality after Sleeve Gastrectomy in Patients over 60 Years : Retrospective Review and Data Analysis of the German Bariatric Surgery Registry

BACKGROUND

The population are getting older and obesity is growing. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is increasingly used worldwide but is still used with skepticism in the elderly. The purpose of our analysis is to judge the security of LSG in patients older than 60 years compared to patients younger than 60 years.

METHODS

This retrospective review included data of all patients in Germany who underwent LSG between January 2005 and December 2016.The data were published online in the German Bariatric Surgery Registry. A total of 21,571 operations were gathered and divided into two groups: group I, patients < 60 years old; and group II, patients ≥ 60 years old.

RESULTS

The total number of patients and the mean body mass index of group I and group II was 19,786, 51.7 ± 9.5 kg/m² and 1771, 49.2 ± 8.1 kg/m², respectively. Regarding comorbidities, group II suffered statistically significantly more comorbidities than group I (p < 0.001). The general postoperative complications were 4.9% in group I and 7.8% in group II (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in special postoperative complications (p = 0.048) and a slightly higher intraoperative complication rate in group II (2.2% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.048). Thirty-day mortality rate for group I versus II was 0.22% and 0.23% (p = 0.977), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

LSG is a low-risk operation and safe surgical method with acceptable, not elevated perioperative morbidity and mortality rates in patients ≥ 60 years of age.

Bariatric Procedures in Older Adults in the United States: Analysis of a Multicenter Database

Background: Bariatric procedures help reduce obesity-related comorbidities and thus improve survival. Clinical characteristics and outcomes after bariatric procedures in older adults were investigated. Methods: A multi-institutional Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried from years 2005 through 2012. Older adults >60 years of age with procedure codes for bariatric procedures and a diagnosis of obesity/morbid obesity were selected to compare clinical characteristics/outcomes between those undergoing closed versus open procedures and identify risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality and increased hospital length of stay (LOS). Results: Over the study period, 79,122 bariatric procedures were performed. Those undergoing open procedures compared to closed procedures had a higher in-hospital mortality (0.8% vs. 0.2%) and a longer hospital LOS (4.8 days vs. 2.2 days). Risk factors significantly associated with in-hospital mortality were open procedures, the Western region, and the Elixhauser comorbidity index. Risk factors associated with increased LOS were Medicaid insurance type, an open procedure, a higher Elixhauser comorbidity score, a required skilled nursing facility (SNF) discharge, and died in hospital. Conclusion: Closed bariatric procedures are increasingly being preferred in older adults, with a four-fold lower mortality compared to open procedures. Besides choice of procedure, the presence of specific comorbidities is associated with increased mortality in older adults.

Surgical Morbidity in the Elderly Bariatric Patient: Does Age Matter?

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a global health problem that also affects older adults. In Chile, as in most of the developing countries, more than half of older adults are overweight or obese, and bariatric surgery may be riskier for this group. The aim of this study is to compare our experience in patients over 60 years of age with a control group to determine associated surgical morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

Case-control study of bariatric surgeries performed between 2006 and 2017 in our institution. Patients aged ≥ 60 years for the case group versus control group for patients ≤ 50 years selected randomly, matched by body mass index, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, surgical technique, and gender (ratio 1:2). Primary endpoint was surgical morbidity, 30-day readmission, and mortality.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients in case group were matched with 144 patients in control group. Surgical complications rate was the same for both groups. No differences were observed in the conversion to open surgery rate or 30-day readmission rate. There was no mortality in this series.

CONCLUSION

In this case-control study, being elderly does not increase the risk of morbidity and mortality associated with bariatric surgery.

Treatment of obesity in older persons-A systematic review

The study aims to systematically review the available evidence regarding weight loss interventions (lifestyle, surgical, and pharmacological) for obesity in adults aged over 60 years. A search of prospective, randomized studies took place in January 2018, on Medline (Web of Science) and PubMed databases. Search terms included the following: elderly, obese, hypocaloric, pharmacotherapy, and bariatric surgery. Abstracts were screened for eligibility. A total of 256 publications regarding lifestyle interventions were identified; of these, 69 studies were eligible. As no eligible studies were identified for pharmacotherapy or bariatric surgery, the search was broadened to include non- randomized studies. Four pharmacotherapy and 66 surgery studies were included. Lifestyle intervention had similar weight loss efficacy in older compared with younger people, with positive effects on a number of relevant outcomes, including physical function and cardiovascular parameters. There was little data regarding obesity pharmacotherapy in older persons. The available data for bariatric surgery indicate comparable weight loss and resolution of type 2 diabetes, with similar or slightly higher complication rates in older compared with younger people. Older age alone should not be considered a contraindication to intensive lifestyle or surgical intervention for obesity. There are insufficient data to guide clinical decisions regarding obesity pharmacotherapy in older people.

The Impact of Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass on Comorbidities and Quality of Life in the Older Obese Patients (Age > 60): Our UK Experience

BACKGROUND

With population ageing, more older patients would benefit from the reduced comorbidities associated with laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). However, health care providers are still reluctant to offer bariatric surgery to older obese patients due to the perceived increased risk and possible reduced benefit. Here, we report the outcomes of first UK series of LRYGB in patients (> 60 years) with emphasis on quality of life (QoL).

SETTING

University hospital.

METHODS

Data was collected prospectively on all patients aged > 60 years undergoing LRYGB between 2006 and 2011. Patients had a minimum 1-year follow-up. Data related to weight loss, peri-operative complications and obesity-related morbidity (ORM) was collected. Patients' QoL was assessed by postal questionnaire.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients with a median age of 63 (60-71) underwent LRYGB with a median follow-up of 23 (12-55) months. There was a significant drop in patients' BMI [mean (SD) 47.5 (6.2) to 31.2 (4.4) kg/m²]. Patients had an average 69% (SD 17%) excess weight loss and 34% (SD 10%) total body weight loss. The median hospital stay was 3 (1-16) with 13% peri-operative morbidity and no mortality. There was a 25% (30/123) resolution and 54% (66/123) 'improvement' in ORM. The QoL score increased significantly in several domains particularly physical performance (2.8 to 8.0, p < 0.001), self-esteem (3.6 to 8.3, p < 0.001) and mobility (2.9 to 7.5, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

LRYGB in patients aged > 60 years can be performed safely and with weight loss comparable to younger patients. There is associated benefit in reducing ORM and substantial improvement in QoL.

Patient Characteristics, Procedural and Safety Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery in England: a Retrospective Cohort Study-2006-2012

BACKGROUND

The objective of the study is to analyze procedural and safety outcomes associated with bariatric surgery and describe the characteristics of patients undertaking bariatric procedures in England between April 2006 and March 2012.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of all adult patients in England diagnosed with obesity and undergoing bariatric surgery as a primary procedure in NHS-funded sites between April 2006 and March 2012 using data sourced from the Hospital Episode Statistics dataset. Length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission, and post-surgery complication were analyzed as primary outcomes. Socio-demographic background, provider type, procedure volume, and comorbidities were all analyzed as potential explanatory variables.

RESULTS

Gastric bypass (GBP, 12,628) was the most utilized procedure, followed by gastric banding (GB, 6872) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG, 3251). The most prevalent comorbidity was type 2 diabetes (23%). Inpatient mortality was low (≤ 0.15%) for all procedure types. LOS and the risks of both post-operative complication and 30-day readmission were significantly lower for GB, relative to those for GBP and SG. Ethnicity, geographical area, surgery type, and volume were all associated with LOS, risk of readmission, and complication. Provider type and deprivation were further associated with LOS while age correlated with readmission only. An increasing comorbidity burden was associated with an increased risk of both readmission and complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric bypass was the most frequently reported procedure in England across the observation period. While utilization across all procedure types increased between 2007 and 2010, overall uptake of bariatric surgery in England represents only a small proportion of the eligible population. Readmission and complication rates were lower for gastric banding relative to those for either gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy. The observed inpatient mortality rate was low across all procedure types.

Gastric Bypass in Older Patients: Complications, Weight Loss, and Resolution of Comorbidities at 2 Years in a Matched Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has recently been authorized for use in older patients. The objective of this single-center study was to evaluate 2-year weight loss in patients ≥60 years compared with younger matched patients undergoing RYGB. Secondary aims were to record complications and the resolution of comorbidities in a 2-year follow-up.

METHODS

Of 722 patients with at least 2 years follow-up data, 48 elderly patients were matched with 92 young (<40 years) and 96 middle-aged (40-59 year) patients, according to sex, baseline body mass index, and date of surgery. Weight loss, remission of comorbidities, death, and early (30-day) and 2-year complication rates were compared.

RESULTS

There were three deaths in the elderly group and none in the other groups. The early complication rate was not significantly different in the elderly group (17.8 %) compared with the young (11.5 %, p = 0.637) and middle-aged (13.7 %, p = 1.000) groups. The 2-year complication rates were not significantly different in the elderly group (9.3 %) compared with the young (23.5 %, p = 0.107) and middle-aged (13.2 %, p = 1.000) groups. The 2-year weight loss was lower in the elderly group (31.8 ± 7.2 %; p < 0.001) than in the young group (38.3 ± 6.9 %) but was not significantly different from that in the middle-aged group (34.4 ± 8.0 %; p = 0.145). Remission rates for diabetes and obstructive sleep apnea were lower in the elderly than in the two younger groups.

CONCLUSION

After bariatric surgery, major weight loss was observed in patients older than 60, but remission of metabolic comorbidities was less marked than in younger subjects.

Postoperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery in Older Obese Patients: a Matched Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic bariatric surgery (LBS) in older obese patients remains debated regarding postoperative outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this case-control study is to evaluate global results of LBS in patients ≥60 years (yr) with a matched case control study.

METHODS

All patients ≥60 years who benefited from LBS in our center between January 2009 and January 2014 were included in this retrospective study. They were matched (1:2) to patients <40 and 40-59 years on BMI, surgical procedure and year, and history of previous LBS. Postoperative complications in the first 90 days following LBS, micronutrient and mineral deficiencies, and Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients ≥60 year (40 sleeve gastrectomy, 14 one anastomosis gastric bypass, 1 gastric bypass revision) were matched to patients <40 year and patients 40-59 year (n = 55 each). Patients ≥60 year presented more obesity-related comorbidities at baseline. Except for bleeding complications (P = 0.01), no difference in major complication rate was observed (P = 0.43). At 24 months, %EWL was lower in older patients compared to others (76.3, 82.2 and 89.7, respectively, P = 0.009). Iron and vitamin B12 deficiencies were less prevalent in patients ≥60 year After a mean follow-up of 27 months, BAROS score (filled in by 82% of patients) was lower in patients ≥60 years (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Despite less weight loss, postoperative complications rate, and lower BAROS results, LBS keeps an acceptable benefit-risk balance in selected older patients and should not be rejected on the sole argument of age. Additional studies are needed to assess the long-term benefits of LBS in older patients.

Laparoscopic Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass in Elderly Patients (60 Years or Older): A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies

Background and Aims:

Elderly patient might experience an increased risk of complications after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis of comparative studies on this issue in patients aged 60 years or older.

Material and Methods:

A systematic literature search was performed. Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched until July 2016 for studies on outcomes of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in elderly versus younger patients. Primary outcomes were mortality and overall complications. Secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay, excess weight loss percentage, effect on diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and obstructive sleep apnea. Heterogeneity across the studies was evaluated by the I2 test, and a random effects model was used. Results were expressed as mean difference and risk ratio (RR).

Results:

Seven studies involving 3128 patients were retrieved and included in this study. A significantly increased risk of mortality and overall complications was observed among patients older than 60 years compared with younger ones (RR, 6.12; 95% confidence interval 1.08–34.83; p = 0.04; RR, 1.51; 95% confidence interval 1.07–2.11; p = 0.02). Particularly, elderly patients experienced 1% increased risk of mortality and 3% increased risk of overall complications. Length of stay, diabetes, and obstructive sleep apnea remission rates were similar among the groups. Excess weight loss percentage was significantly greater among younger patients (mean difference, −3.44; 95% confidence interval −5.20, −1.68; p < 0.001), as were hypertension (RR, 0.57; 95% confidence interval 0.42–0.76; p < 0.001) and hyperlipidemia (RR, 0.61; 95% confidence interval 0.45–0.83; p = 0.002) remission rates.

Conclusion:

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients older than 60 years may be a risky bariatric surgery operation due to higher complications and mortality and may not be as effective as in patients younger than 60 years. Thus, older patients should be carefully counseled before this procedure for individual risk–benefit assessment.

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Gastric Bypass for The Aging Population

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are the two most common bariatric surgeries for treating morbid obesity. The purpose of this study is to determine differences in outcomes from RYGB or SG between patients ages ≥ 60 years and < 60 years.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who underwent RYGB and SG at our institution from 01/2008 to 05/2012 was conducted. Forty patients from each group (≥60 years and < 60 years) were matched based on gender, body mass index (BMI), co-morbidities, and type of bariatric surgery performed, and their charts were reviewed up to 1 year post-operatively. Primary end points measured were mean length of stay, operative time, incidence of complications, and readmissions in the first post-operative year. A secondary end point measured was percent total weight loss (%TWL) and excess weight loss (%EWL).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between group < 60 and group ≥ 60 in operative time (210 vs. 229 min; p = 0.177), in-hospital post-operative complication rates (2.5 vs. 5 %; p = 1.0), long-term complication rates (2.5 vs. 10 %; p = 0.359), and 30-day readmission rates (2.5 vs. 12.5 %; p = 0.2). Patients in group < 60 had shorter lengths of stay (2.2 vs. 2.7 days; p = 0.031), but this difference is not clinically significant. Both groups achieved similar %TWL (21.4 vs. 20.5 %; p = 0.711) and %EWL (50.6 vs. 50.7 %; p = 0.986).

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced age (≥60 years) is not a significant predictor of a worse outcome for SG and RYGB.

Need for Intensive Nutrition Care After Bariatric Surgery

Severe nutrition complications after bariatric surgery remain poorly described. The aim of this case series was to identify specific factors associated with nutrition complications after bariatric surgery and to characterize their nutrition disorders. We retrospectively reviewed all people referred to the clinical nutrition intensive care unit of our university hospital after bariatric surgery from January 2013 to June 2015. Twelve persons who required artificial nutrition supplies (ie, enteral nutrition or parenteral nutrition) were identified. Seven persons underwent a "one-anastomosis gastric bypass" (OAGB) or "mini gastric bypass," 2 underwent a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, 2 had a sleeve gastrectomy, and 1 had an adjustable gastric band. This case series suggests that OAGB could overexpose subjects to severe nutrition complications requiring intensive nutrition care and therefore cannot be considered a "mini" bariatric surgery. Even if OAGB is often considered a simplified surgical technique, it obviously requires as the other standard bariatric procedures a close follow-up by experimented teams aware of its specific complications.

Sleeve Gastrectomy in Different Age Groups: a Comparative Study of 5-Year Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has been used more frequently over the past 10 years. As the population ages, a larger number of older people will suffer from weight-related comorbidities, resulting in bariatric surgery becoming a dominant solution for improving health and quality of life. We assessed the long-term outcomes of LSG in elderly patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent LSG between January 2007 and August 2009. We subdivided 123 patients into <35 (n = 43), 35-55 (n = 59), and >55 (n = 21) age groups.

RESULTS

The respective mean excess body mass index loss and excess weight loss were 42.5% ± 3.1% and 41.3% ± 12.3% for the <35 age group, 48.7% ± 4.1% and 45.6% ± 10.6% for the 35-55 age group, and 53.6% ± 4.6% and 52.1% ± 11.1% for the >55 age group. The follow-up compliance rates at the 5-year visit were 23.85, 31.11, and 47.61% for the <35, 35-55, and >55 age groups, respectively. The corresponding Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System scores were 3.7 ± 1.1, 4.0 ± 0.7, and 5.3 ± 1.3. The comorbidities of all the patients improved significantly, with a non-significant distribution between the three groups for each comorbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

LSG is a useful tool for people who want to modify their eating habits and lose weight healthily. This study suggests that long-term weight loss, improvements in comorbidity, and compliance to follow-up are significant for patients >55 years old.

Bariatric surgery in elderly patients: a systematic review

Controversy exists regarding the effectiveness and safety of bariatric/metabolic surgery in elderly patients. We performed a systematic review on this issue in patients aged 60 years or older. MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched until August 2015 for studies on outcomes of bariatric surgery in elderly patients. The results were expressed as pooled proportions (%) with 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity across the studies was evaluated by the I² test, and a random-effects model was used. Twenty-six articles encompassing 8,149 patients were pertinent with this issue and included data on bariatric surgery outcomes in elderly population. Fourteen patients died during the 30-day postoperative period, with a pooled mortality of 0.01%. Pooled overall complication rate was 14.7%. At 1-year follow-up, pooled mean excess weight loss was 53.77%, pooled diabetes resolution was 54.5%, and pooled hypertension resolution was 42.5%, while pooled lipid disorder resolution was 41.2%. Outcomes and complication rates of bariatric surgery in patients older than 60 years are comparable to those in a younger population, independent of the type of procedure performed. Patients should not be denied bariatric surgery because of their age alone.

Does Age Influence Bariatric Surgery Outcomes?

Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate presurgical comorbidities, perioperative and postoperative complications, and postsurgical outcomes of minimally invasive bariatric surgery in patients aged 55 years and older to determine if age should be used as a selection criteria for bariatric surgery. Methods: A total of 750 patients underwent sleeve gastrectomy or robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass from January 2008 to June 2014. Patients were divided into three groups according to age: <55 years old; ≥55 to <65 years old; and ≥65 years old. Demographics, presurgical comorbidities, perioperative and postoperative complications (leaks or conversions to open surgery), and postsurgical outcomes were compared across the different groups. Results: Significant differences in presurgical comorbidities were found across age groups (p<0.001). Results from descriptive statistics revealed that patients younger than 55 years of age had a greater number of complications-defined as leaks (n=1) or conversions to open surgery (n=2)-than did patients older than 55 years of age. There were no significant differences across age groups regarding length of stay. Linear regression analysis failed to reveal significant associations between age and percentage excess weight loss at 6, 12, and 24 months follow-up. Conclusions: These initial results suggest that patient selection for bariatric surgery should not be based on age alone.

Should we wait for metabolic complications before operating on obese patients? Gastric bypass outcomes in metabolically healthy obese individuals

BACKGROUND

A subgroup of obese patients without metabolic disorders has been identified and defined as metabolically healthy but morbidly obese (MHMO).

OBJECTIVES

To compare Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) outcomes between MHMO and metabolically unhealthy morbidly obese (MUMO) patients to assess whether the obesity phenotype could affect the results.

SETTING

A university-affiliated tertiary care center.

METHODS

One hundred nineteen consecutive patients underwent RYGB; 102 completed the 2-year follow-up and were divided into 2 groups (MHMO and MUMO) according to Wildman criteria, including blood pressure, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), fasting blood sugar, C-reactive protein (CRP), and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Weight loss and metabolic parameter changes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Twenty-one of 102 (20.6%) patients were identified as MHMO; they were mostly women (90.5%) and were significantly younger than MUMO patients (39.4 ± 9.1 yr versus 47.2 ± 10, P = .001); 12.6% were lost to follow-up. MHMO phenotype was significantly associated with a greater percentage of excess body mass index loss (P = .03), independent of gender, age, and redo procedures. All metabolic parameters were significantly improved 2 years after surgery in the MUMO group. HOMA-IR, CRP, and triglycerides were significantly lower 2 years after surgery in the MHMO group, whereas fasting blood sugar and HDL-C were unchanged. At 2 years of follow-up, 92.3% of the population was metabolically healthy.

CONCLUSIONS

RYGB is an effective procedure to achieve weight loss and had a strong positive metabolic effect in both MHMO and MUMO phenotypes. RYGB led to an increase of the metabolically healthy status and may prevent or delay the onset of metabolic disorders.