A Comparison of the Bariatric Procedures that Are Performed in the Treatment of Super Morbid Obesity

Patients with Severe Obesity Undergoing Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and an Updated Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) contributes significantly to higher weight loss at 6 to 12 months when compared to Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) in patients with severe obesity (SO-body mass index (BMI) ≥ 50 kg/m2). However, there is still no consensus regarding the best procedure in terms of mortality and complication rates. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the complication rates between these two surgical procedures.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central were searched for studies that compared LRYGB and LSG in SO patients. We pooled outcomes for mortality and complications, defined as bleeding, cardiovascular events, conversion to open procedure, and a composite endpoint of leak, abscess, fistulas, and reoperation. Length of stay and operative time were also pooled. A random-effects model was used, and statistical analyses were performed using R version 4.4.0.

RESULTS

A total of 156,767 patients from 28 observational studies were included, of whom 79,324 (50.6%) underwent LRYGB and 77,443 (49.4%) LSG. Length of stay (MD 0.45; 95% CI 0.42-0.48; P < 0.01) and operative time (MD 58.88; 95% CI 37.88-79.87; P < 0.01) were lower in the LSG group. Overall, there was no difference in mortality (OR 1.28; 95% CI 0.80-2.04; P = 0.311) and in complication rates (OR 1.22; 95% CI 0.85-1.76; P = 0.287). A subgroup analysis showed lower conversion to open procedure for patients who underwent LSG (OR 2.75; 95% CI 1.90-3.98; P < 0.001), and no difference was noted in bleeding (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.47-2.07; P = 0.965), cardiovascular events (OR 0.99; 95% CI 0.43-2.29; P = 0.983), and a composite endpoint of leak, abscess, and fistulas (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.67-1.01; P = 0.066).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis suggests that there is no difference in mortality and complication rates between the two groups. However, length of stay and operative time were lower in SO patients who underwent LSG.

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Effects of Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy on Dyslipidemia

The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the effects of LRYGB and LSG on dyslipidemia. Studies comparing the effects of LRYGB and LSG on dyslipidemia with follow-up of 12 months or more were included. Twenty-four studies comprising seven RCTs and 17 comparative observational studies were included. Meta-analysis of RCTs (n=487) showed that improvement/resolution of dyslipidemia was better after LRYGB (68.5%, n=161/235) compared to LSG (48.4%, n=122/252). Patients undergoing LRYGB were more than twice as likely to experience improvement/resolution in dyslipidemia compared to those undergoing LSG (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.21-4.29, p=0.010). Both LRGYB and LSG appears effective in improving dyslipidemia at >12 months after surgery; however, this improvement is more than twice higher after LRYGB compared to LSG.

Outcomes of totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2: can the robot level out "traditional" risk factors?

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 50 kg/m2 is a challenging procedure and BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2 has been identified as independent risk factor for postoperative complications and increased morbidity in previous studies. The objective of the present study was to assess whether a BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2 and various established risk factors maintain their significance in patients undergoing fully robotic RYGB (rRYGB). A single-center analysis of prospectively collected data of 113 consecutive patients undergoing standardized rRYGB with robotic stapling technique and hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy using the daVinci Xi system. Surgical outcomes were analyzed considering a number of individual perioperative risk factors including BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2. The mean BMI of the total cohort was 50.6 ± 5.5 kg/m2 and 63.7% of patients had a BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2. There were no major surgical and perioperative complications in patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2 as well as in those with BMI < 50 kg/m2 after rRYGB. We identified female sex and surgeon experience but neither body weight, BMI, metabolic disorders, ASA nor EOSS scores as independent factors for shorter operation times (OT) in multivariate analyses. Complication rates and length of hospital stay (LOS) did not significantly differ between patients with potential risk factors and those without. rRYGB is a safe procedure in both, patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2 and with BMI < 50 kg/m2. Higher body weight and BMI did affect neither OT nor LOS. A fully robotic approach for RYGB might help to overcome "traditional" risk factors identified in conventional laparoscopic bariatric surgery. However, larger and prospective studies are necessary to confirm these results.

Nutritional Status, Selected Nutrients Intake, and Metabolic Disorders in Bariatric Surgery Patients

Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for obesity and its complications. However, failure to adhere to dietary recommendations can result in both unsatisfactory weight loss and metabolic disorders. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of bariatric surgery on the anthropometric parameters and selected nutrient intake. A total of 12 months postoperatively, percent excess weight loss (%EWL) was significantly higher after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) than laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) (93.78% vs. 56.13% and 55.65%, p < 0.001). The same was true for waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) (p = 0.017) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) changes (p = 0.022). There was a significant decrease in total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels after RYGB. A significant decrease (p < 0.05) in daily intake was found for energy (4278.4 kcal vs. 1355.17 kcal), sucrose (122.23 g vs. 38.22 g), dietary fiber (30.90 g vs. 14.20 g), eicosapentaenoic fatty acid and docosahexaenoic acid (EPA+DHA) (142.46 mg vs. 52.90 mg) and % energy from fats (42.43% vs. 35.17%), saturated fatty acids (SAFAs) (19.96% vs. 14.11%) and alpha-linolenic fatty acid (ALA) (0.87% vs. 0.69%). Energy intake and energy % from fats positively correlated with body weight (BW), waist circumference (WC), WHR, and WHtR, and negatively with %EWL. The percentage of unsaturated fatty acids positively correlated with WC and WHR. Energy intake correlated positively with serum triglycerides (TGs) and energy % from fats and carbohydrates. Despite significant weight loss, the patient's diet deviated from recommendations and may have contributed to metabolic disorders.

A Single-Center Experience: What is the Effect of Sleeve Gastrectomy in Patients With a BMI ≥ 50 kg/m²?

BACKGROUND

Our research aimed to see how sleeve gastrectomy (SG) affects weight loss and comorbidities in patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 50 kg/m².

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prospectively kept data of patients with a BMI ≥50 kg/m² who underwent SG between February 2016 and February 2020 were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 138 patients with a BMI ≥ 50 kg/m² were operated on. The average BMI was 56.36±7.661, the average age was 37.41±12.33. Forty-eight patients underwent concomitant cholecystectomy and/or hiatal hernia repair (HHR). The percentage of excess weight loss (EWL%) of patients at the 3rd, 6th, 12th, 18th, and 24th months were 36%, 54%, 67%, 72%, and 74%, respectively. Mean BMI values of the 0th, 3rd, 6th, 12th, 18th, and 24th months were 56, 45, 39, 35, 33, and 33, respectively. 0th, 3rd, 6th, 12th, 18th, and 24th months were significantly different for EWL%, total weight loss (TWL%), and BMI variables (p<0.001), but EWL% (p=0.527), TWL% (p=0.396) and BMI (p=0,657) were not found significantly different between the 18th and 24th months. When EWL% ≥ 50 was accepted, the success rate was 93% (n=93) and 92% (n=50) at the 18th and 24th months, respectively. While there was 82% remission in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and 90% in hypertension (HT), the remission rate in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) undergoing HHR was 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with a BMI ≥ 50 kg/m², SG seems to be an effective and safe therapy option as the first line for weight loss and treatment of comorbid diseases. Further long-term studies are needed to confirm these results.

The first survey addressing patients with BMI over 50: a survey of 789 bariatric surgeons

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery in patients with BMI over 50 kg/m2 is a challenging task. The aim of this study was to address main issues regarding perioperative management of these patients by using a worldwide survey.

METHODS

An online 48-item questionnaire-based survey on perioperative management of patients with a BMI superior to 50 kg/m2 was ideated by 15 bariatric surgeons from 9 different countries. The questionnaire was emailed to all members of the International Federation of Surgery for Obesity (IFSO). Responses were collected and analyzed by the authors.

RESULTS

789 bariatric surgeons from 73 countries participated in the survey. Most surgeons (89.9%) believed that metabolic/bariatric surgery (MBS) on patients with BMI over 50 kg/m2 should only be performed by expert bariatric surgeons. Half of the participants (55.3%) believed that weight loss must be encouraged before surgery and 42.6% of surgeons recommended an excess weight loss of at least 10%. However, only 3.6% of surgeons recommended the insertion of an Intragastric Balloon as bridge therapy before surgery. Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) was considered the best choice for patients younger than 18 or older than 65 years old. SG and One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass were the most common procedures for individuals between 18 and 65 years. Half of the surgeons believed that a 2-stage approach should be offered to patients with BMI > 50 kg/m2, with SG being the first step. Postoperative thromboprophylaxis was recommended for 2 and 4 weeks by 37.8% and 37.7% of participants, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This survey demonstrated worldwide variations in bariatric surgery practice regarding patients with a BMI superior to 50 kg/m2. Careful analysis of these results is useful for identifying several areas for future research and consensus building.

Outcome of Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Patients with Super Obesity (Body Mass Index > 50 kg/m2)

PURPOSE

With increasing BMI, the complexity of treating patients with obesity rises. The focus of this study is to investigate the effects of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) on perioperative morbidity and remission of comorbidities at 3 years in patients with a BMI > 50 kg/m².

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective multicenter analysis of a prospectively maintained database was performed to enroll patients with a 3-year follow-up after SG or RYGB between 2005 and 2019 and a BMI of > 50 kg/m² preoperatively. Patients' BMI and comorbidity status were recorded preoperatively.

RESULTS

We analyzed data from 2939 patients who had at least a preoperative BMI > 50 kg/m². A total of 1278 patients underwent RYGB surgery, and 1661 underwent SG. The distribution of sex, BMI, hypertension, reflux, and sleep apnea was significant between the two groups. Three years after surgery, the percent excess weight loss (%EWL) was 62.21% in RYGB and 55.87% in SG (p < 0.001). The change in hypertension (p < 0.001) and reflux (p < 0.001) was significantly in favor of RYGB. The change in diabetes mellitus was not significant between the two groups (p > 5%). There was a minimal difference in sleep apnea in favor of SG (p < 0.001). Mortality and overall complication rates were not significant in either group.

CONCLUSION

Both procedures positively affected comorbidities, BMI, and %EWL in patients with super obesity 3 years after surgery. In some categories, RYGB was better than SG. Nevertheless, the decision between the two methods remains a matter of the surgeon's experience and the patient's general condition.

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Patients with Super Obesity: Primary Response Criteria and Their Relationship with Comorbidities Remission

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of super obesity has increased considerably in recent years, representing up to the 0.5% of the population. Even though bariatric surgery induces significant weight loss in these patients, it has been reported that up to 50% of the patients with super obesity will fail according to the current primary response criteria.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare different primary response criteria and their impact regarding comorbidities remission.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 104 patients with super obesity who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) were identified in our institution from March 2004 to February 2019. An evaluation of the primary response at a 2-year follow-up was made using different criteria. A multivariate analysis was made to evaluate related variables to comorbidities remission.

RESULTS

Two years later, the rate of patients who achieved an EWL > 50%, %EWL > 70%, and BMI < 35 kg/m² were 84.5%, 52.1%, and 62%, respectively. Regarding the comorbidities, 85%, 84.8%, and 81.1% of the patients improved or remitted T2D, HBP, and hyperlipidemia, respectively. An EWL > 50% 2 years later was related to complete remission of hyperlipidemia (p = 0.047), whereas weight regain above 10% is a risk factor for failure of complete remission of HBP in 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

More than 75% of patients with super obesity yield an EWL > 50% 2 years later. In terms of hyperlipidemia, it is desirable to achieve an EWL of at least 50%. Whereas for T2D and HBP, a minimum of 25% TWL yields 72% and 60.5% of complete remission.

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Vs Sleeve Gastrectomy in Super Obesity: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are safe procedures that may present sub-optimal results in superobesity (SO). A meta-analysis was performed aiming to summarize the available evidence on weight loss (primary outcome) and comorbidities resolution of LRYGB and LSG in patients with SO (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2). From the 16 included studies, 7 integrated the meta-analysis. LRYGB showed a significantly higher weight loss at 6 to 12-months, but not after 24 months and a higher dyslipidemia resolution at 12 months. When compared with LSG, LRYGB achieved better weight loss after 6 and 12 months and higher dyslipidemia resolution after 1 year. There were no significant differences for resolution of the other co-morbidities studied.

Ten year comparative analysis of sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch in patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2

INTRODUCTION

Bariatric surgery is the most effective modality to stably reduce weight and related comorbidities in patients suffering from class II and III obesity. Data comparing long-term safety and efficacy of the three most effective bariatric operations are limited in patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m², which complicate shared surgeon-patient decision making regarding optimal procedure selection.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m² who underwent biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) at our institution between 2009 and 2019. Data collected from patients' electronic medical records included operative details as well as BMI and presence and resolution of obesity-related comorbidities at 0, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 60 months post-operatively.

RESULTS

Among 537 patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m² who had a primary bariatric procedure, 93 patients underwent BPD/DS (17.3%), 341 patients underwent RYGB (63.5%), and 103 patients underwent SG (19.2%). BMI decreased by 23.7 kg/m² in BPD/DS, 14.7 kg/m² in RYGB, and 13.6 kg/m² in SG cohorts at 60 months post-operatively (p < 0.0001). The greatest %TWL occurred in BPD/DS cohort (38.4%) followed by the RYGB (26.3%) and SG (23.6%) cohorts (p < 0.0001). The thirty-day complication rate was 12.9% for BPD/DS, 4.7% for RYGB, and 8.7% for SG (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that the BPD/DS is the most effective operation at long-term reduction of BMI and achieved highest %TWL while SG and RYGB had similar results at 60 months post-op. BPD/DS is associated with increased early and late surgical complications compared to RYGB and SG.

Long-Term Efficacy of Bariatric Surgery for the Treatment of Super-Obesity: Comparison of SG, RYGB, and OAGB

BACKGROUND

The most appropriate procedure for the treatment of super obesity (BMI > 50 kg/m²) is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the safety, long-term (> 5 years) weight loss, and adverse events between three commonly performed procedures, sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) in super-obese patients.

METHODS

Between January 2002 and December 2015, 498 successive patients with super morbid obesity (BMI > 50), who underwent SG or RYGB or OAGB, were recruited. Surgical outcome, weight loss, resolution of co-morbidities, and late complications were followed and compared between the 3 groups. All data derived from a prospective bariatric database and a retrospective analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

The average patient age was 32.1 ± 10.4 years, with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 56.0 ± 6.7 kg/m². Of them, 190 (38.9%) underwent SG, 62 (12.4%) RYGB, and 246 (49.4%) OAGB. There was no difference in basic characters between the 3 groups except SG had fewer diabetic patients. RYGB group had higher intraoperative blood loss, longer operating time, and hospital stay than the other 2 groups. RYGB had a higher 30-days post-operative major complication rate (4.8%) than SG (0.5%) and OAGB (0.8%). The follow-up rate at 1 and 5 years was 89.4% and 52.0%. At post-operative 5 years, OAGB had a higher total weight loss (40.8%) than SG (35.1%), but not RYGB (37.2%). SG had a lower remission rate in dyslipidemia comparing to OAGB and RYGB, but T2DM remission rate was no different between the groups. The overall revision rate is 5.4% (27/498) of the whole group, and SG had a lower revision rate (2.6%) than RYGB (8.1%) and OAGB (6.9%).

CONCLUSION

SG is an effective and durable primary bariatric procedure for the treatment of super obesity and metabolic disorders. OAGB had a similar operation risk to SG but resulted in a better weight loss than SG.

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy for Super Super Obese and Super Obese: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Weight Results, Comorbidity Resolution

BACKGROUND

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) used for super obesity (SO) and super super obesity (SSO) remain controversial. The meta-analysis was to summarize the evidence.

METHODS

We searched in MEDLINE and PubMed for studies concerning RYGB and SG for SO or SSO and pooled complication, percentage excess weight loss (%EWL), and resolution of comorbidities.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were identified. RYGB achieved higher %EWL at 12 months, but no significant difference at 24 months. Resolution of diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia reached a statistical significance; however, there was no significant difference in hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

RYGB was superior in %EWL for SSO and SO at 12 months. However, regarding at 24 months, RYGB was equal to SG, which is from a meta-analysis and cannot be seen as a definitive conclusion.

Comparative Effectiveness of Different Bariatric Procedures in Super Morbid Obesity

BACKGROUND

Super obesity (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m²) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The best procedure to treat super obesity is not completely established. Our aim was to compare the effectiveness of bariatric procedures (adjustable gastric band [AGB], Roux-en-Y gastric bypass [RYGB], sleeve gastrectomy [SG]) in super obesity.

METHODS

Retrospective observational study of super obese patients who underwent bariatric surgery. Data was assessed preoperatively and in the 1st and 2nd years of follow-up.

RESULTS

We evaluated 213 individuals, 77.9% female, age of 43.38 ± 11.49 years, and preoperative BMI of 54.53 ± 4.54 kg/m²; 19 submitted to AGB, 127 to RYGB, and 67 to SG. In the pre-surgical assessment, there were no significant differences in age, anthropometric parameters, blood pressure, glycemic profile, and lipid profile between the three surgical groups. The percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) in the 1st year was 67.58% in RYGB, 58.74% in SG, and 38.71% in AGB (p < 0.001), and the percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) was 36.29%, 31.59%, and 21.07%, respectively (p < 0.001). Two years after surgery (n = 147; follow-up rate of 69%), the %EWL and %TWL were significantly higher in the RYGB group (p < 0.001). RYGB had a higher success rate (%EWL ≥ 50% and %TWL ≥ 20%) in both years of follow-up (p < 0.001). In multiple linear regression, after adjusting for other covariates, RYGB was the only strong predictive factor of %EWL and %TWL (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

RYGB proved to be more effective in super obesity. The beneficial effects in weight loss were evident both 1 and 2 years after the procedure, regardless of pre-surgical anthropometric characteristics.