Acid Reflux Is Common in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease After One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass

Update on esophageal function, acid and non-acid reflux after one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB): high-resolution manometry, impedance-24-h pH-metry, and gastroscopy in a prospective mid-term study

BACKGROUND

One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is the third most common metabolic/bariatric procedure worldwide. A point for discussion regarding OAGB is acid and non-acid reflux in mid- and long-term follow-up. The aim of this study was to objectively evaluate reflux and esophagus motility by comparing pre- and postoperative results of 24-h pH-metry, high-resolution manometry (HRM), and gastroscopy.

SETTING

Cross-sectional study and university hospital based.

METHODS

This study includes primary OAGB patients operated at the Medical University of Vienna before 31st December 2022. After a mean follow-up of 4.1 ± 2.9 years, the preoperative examinations were repeated. Additionally, history of weight, remission of obesity-related complications (ORC), and quality of life (QOL) were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients were included in this study and went through all examinations. Preoperative weight was 125.5 ± 21.0 kg with a BMI of 44.6 ± 5.4 kg/m2 and total weight loss after 4.1 ± 2.9 years was 37.1 ± 8.1%. Remission of ORC and QOL outcomes was successful in all categories. Gastroscopy showed anastomositis, esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, and bile in the pouch in 38.0%, 34.0%, 6.0%, and 48.0%, respectively. In HRM, the postoperative lower esophageal sphincter pressure was 29.6 ± 15.1 mmHg (unchanged to preoperative). The total number of refluxes was equal to preoperative, whereas decreased acid refluxes were replaced by increasing non-acid refluxes. Impedance-24-h pH-metry showed that acid exposure time of the esophagus and DeMeester score decreased significantly to 1.6 ± 1.4% (p = 0.001) and 10.3 ± 9.6 (p = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

This study has shown decreased rates of acid reflux and increased rates of non-acid reflux after a mid-term outcome of primary OAGB patients. Gastroscopy showed significant signs of chronic reflux exposure of the anastomosis, the pouch, and the distal esophagus, even in asymptomatic patients. General follow-up visits in patients after OAGB should be considered.

The Impact of Cholecystectomy on Bile Reflux After One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass

BACKGROUND

Bile reflux (BR) is an issue after one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). Cholecystectomy can increase BR in patients without a history of metabolic and bariatric surgery. We aimed to evaluate the effect of cholecystectomy on BR after OAGB.

METHODS

This prospective observational study was conducted between March 2017 and December 2022 including 34 matched adult individuals with a body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m2 or ≥ 35 in the presence of comorbidities and gallstone disease in preop evaluations who underwent primary OAGB including 17 patients who had undergone cholecystectomy simultaneously or after OAGB (OAGB + LC) and 17 patients without cholecystectomy (OAGB). All patients underwent evaluations for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and bile reflux (BR) using various methods including esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), the GERD-Q questionnaire, and a hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid (HIDA) scan.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were included in this study. BR into the esophagus was not detected in both groups. BR to the gastric pouch was observed in 4 patients (23.5%) of the OAGB group and 6 patients (35.3%) of the OAGB + LC group (P = 0.452). BR to gastric remnant was observed in 6 patients (one and five patients in OAGB and OAGB + LC groups respectively) (P = 0.072). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups, although it was clinically significant.

CONCLUSION

Cholecystectomy after OAGB is not associated with a change in the rate of BR in the gastric pouch but increases the incidence of BR into gastric remnant that may be harmful in the long term.

Long-Term Outcome of One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: 10-Year Follow-Up of a Single Institution Series

BACKGROUND

This study aims to evaluate the long-term efficacy, safety, nutritional status, and resolution of obesity complications of patients following one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB).

METHODS

A retrospective observational study of patients who underwent OAGB in our center between January 2011 and December 2013 was performed.

RESULTS

During the study period, 152 patients underwent OAGB procedure in our center. Among them, 26 patients were lost to follow up and therefore were excluded from the data analysis. A total of 126 patients completed long-term follow-up of 10 years. The mean age of patients at baseline was 41 ± 12.5 years (range 20-68). At 10-year follow-up, mean excess weight loss (EWL) was 68.9 ± 22.8%. Mean BMI was 29.7 ± 12.9 kg/m2, representing an overall BMI reduction of 10.6 kg/m2. At 10-year follow-up among the 126 patients, 80% had resolution in DM, 71% had resolution in HTN, and 85% had resolution in OSA. There were no instances of severe malnutrition in the 126 patients in our study.

CONCLUSIONS

OAGB is an effective choice of bariatric/metabolic surgery for patients with higher BMI which provides good weight loss in terms of % TWL and % EWL without significant recurrent weight gain or inadequate weight loss with negligible nutritional deficiencies.

Effect of anti-reflux suture on gastroesophageal reflux symptoms after one anastomosis gastric bypass: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is an issue after one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and modification of OAGB with adding an anti-reflux system may decrease the incidence of postoperative GERD. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of the anti-reflux mechanism to treat preoperative GERD and prevent de novo GERD.

METHODS

A prospective randomized clinical trial study was conducted on patients with a body mass index of 40 and more from August 2020 to February 2022. Patients undergoing one anastomosis gastric bypass with and without anti-reflux sutures (groups A and B, respectively). These patients had follow-ups for one year after the surgery. GERD symptoms were assessed in all the patients using the GERD symptom questionnaire.

RESULTS

The mean age was 39.5 ± 9.8 years and 40.7 ± 10.2 years in groups A and B respectively. GERD symptoms remission occurred in 76.5% and 68.4% of patients in groups A and B, respectively. The incidence of de novo GERD symptoms was lower in group A, compared to group B (6.2% and 16.1% in groups A and B respectively), without any statistically significant difference (p-value: 0.239).

CONCLUSION

GERD symptoms and de novo GERD after OAGB seems to be under-reported after OAGB. This study suggests that applying an anti-reflux suture can decrease de novo GERD symptoms.

Conversion of one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): who is more at risk? A multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Although gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) affects 0.6% to 10% of patients operated on for one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), only about 1% require surgery to convert to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) [3-5]. The aim of the present study was to analyze the characteristics of OAGB patients converted to RYGB for GERD not responding to medical treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study included patients who underwent conversion from OAGB to RYGB for severe GERD. The conversion was performed with resection of the previous gastro-jejunal anastomosis and the use of the afferent loop as a new biliary loop.

RESULTS

A total of 126 patients were included in the study. Of these patients, 66 (52.6%) had a past medical history of bariatric restrictive surgery (gastric banding, sleeve gastrectomy). A hiatal hernia (HH) was present in 56 patients (44.7%). The association between previous restrictive surgery and HH was recorded in 33 (26.2%) patients. Three-dimensional gastric computed tomography showed an average gastric pouch volume of 242.4 ± 55.1 cm3. Conversion to RYGB was performed on average 60 ± 35.6 months after OAGB. Seven patients (5.5%) experienced an early postoperative complication (4 patients grade IIIb and 3 grade IIb), and 3 (2.4%) a late complication. Patients showed further weight loss after RYGB conversion and an average of 24.8 ± 21.7 months after surgery, with a mean % of total weight loss (%TWL) of 6.9 ± 13.6 kg. From a clinical point of view, the problem of GERD was definitively solved in more than 90% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Situations that weaken the esogastric junction appear to be highly frequent in patients operated on for OAGB and converted to RYGB for severe reflux. Similarly, the correct creation of the gastric pouch could play an important role in reducing the risk of conversion to RYGB for GERD.

One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass as Revisional Surgery Following Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Although sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most performed metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) worldwide, some patients require conversional procedures due to weight recurrence or late complications. Recently, one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) gained popularity as a viable option to address those problems. The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the safety and efficacy of conversional OAGB after primary SG in the management of patients with obesity.

METHODS

Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for articles from their inception to February 2023 by two independent reviewers using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) system. The review was registered prospectively with PROSPERO (CRD42023403528).

RESULTS

From 1,117 studies screened, twenty studies met the eligibility criteria, with a total of 1,057 patients with obesity undergoing conversional OAGB after primary SG. The mean age ranged from 28.2 to 49.5 years, and 744 patients (75.2%) were women. At one year after revisional OAGB, the pooled mean percent excess weight loss (%EWL) was 65.2% (95%CI: 56.9, 73.4, I2 = 97%). The pooled mean %EWL after conversional OAGB was 71.1% (95%CI: 62.2, 80.0, I2 = 90%) at two years and 71.6% (95%CI: 61.0, 82.2, I2 = 50%) at five years. Additionally, resolution rates of diabetes and hypertension were 65.4% (95%CI: 0.522, 0.785, I2 = 65%) and 58.9% (95%CI: 0.415, 0.762, I2 = 89%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis demonstrated OAGB as an effective conversional procedure after primary SG in terms of weight loss and obesity-associated medical problems for selected patients. Despite the promising results, further randomized controlled studies with larger sample sizes and more extended follow-up periods are necessary to determine if the OAGB is the best conversional surgery after SG.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Acid and Bile Reflux Esophagitis Prevention by Modified Fundoplication of the Excluded Stomach in One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: 1-Year Results of the FundoRing Trial

BACKGROUND

The advantages and disadvantages of one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) with primary modified fundoplication using the excluded stomach ("FundoRing") is unclear. We aimed to assess the impact of this operation in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and answer the next questions: (1) What the impact of wrapping the fundus of the excluded part of the stomach in OAGB on protection in the experimental group against developing de novo reflux esophagitis? (2) If preoperative RE could be improved in the experimental group? (3) Can preoperative acid reflux as measured by PH impedance, be treated by the addition of the "FundoRing"?

METHODS

The study design was a single-center prospective, interventional, open-label (no masking) RCT (FundoRing Trial) with 1-year follow-up. Endpoints were body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) and acid and bile RE assessed endoscopically by Los Angeles (LA) classification and 24-h pH impedance monitoring. Complications were graded by Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC).

RESULTS

One hundred patients (n = 50 FundoRingOAGB (f-OAGB) vs n = 50 standard OAGB (s-OAGB)) with complete follow-up data were included in the study. During OAGB procedures, patients with hiatal hernia underwent cruroplasty (29/50 f-OAGB; 24/50 s-OAGB). There were no leaks, bleeding, or deaths in either group. At 1 year, BMI in the f-OAGB group was 25.3 ± 2.77 (19-30) vs 26.48 ± 2.8 (21-34) s-OAGB group (p = 0.03). In f-OAGB vs s-OAGB groups, respectively, acid RE was seen in 1 vs 12 patients (p = 0.001) and bile RE in 0 vs 4 patients (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Routine use of a modified fundoplication of the OAGB-excluded stomach to treat patients with obesity decreased acid and prevented bile reflux esophagitis significantly more effectively than standard OAGB at 1 year in a randomized controlled trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04834635.

Gastric cancer after Bariatric Bypass Surgery. Do they relate? (A Systematic Review)

Bariatric bypass surgery has been an effective treatment for morbid obesity. However, there is an increasing number of reported cases of gastric cancer after bypass surgery. Our systematic review showed an increasing trend of gastric cancer cases after bariatric bypass surgery in the last decade, mostly located in the excluded stomach (77%) and diagnosed in an advanced stage. In addition to known risk factors such as tobacco smoking (17%), H. pylori infection (6%), and family history of gastric cancer (3%), bile reflux, a recently proposed cancer-promoting factor, was also estimated in 18% of the cases. Our data suggest that gastric cancer risk assessment should be considered before gastric bypass surgery, and further investigations are needed to determine the value of post-operative gastric cancer surveillance.

The Surgical Technique of Primary Modified Fundoplication Using the Excluded Stomach with Simultaneous Gastric Bypass

PURPOSE

The aim of this work is to demonstrate a new concept of the surgical technique "FundoRing" for the prevention of acid and bile reflux esophagitis after gastric bypass.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A laparoscopic surgical technique of gastric bypass simultaneous with combined upper total and lower left partial fundoplication. This described case is a participant in an ongoing randomized clinical trial.

RESULTS

The patient was without complications and was discharged on the third postoperative day. Delta BMI was 14 kg/m² (38-24) at the 1-year follow-up. The patient did not have heartburn or bile reflux esophagitis after surgery. Evaluation of the mucosa of the esophagus by upper endoscopy after each of the 3 follow-up visits demonstrated that reflux esophagitis had resolved. Intraoperative fluorescence imaging technologies (NIR/ICG) (IMAGE1 S™ Rubina®) were to determine the quality of blood supply-no violation of the blood supply to the fundoplication wrap of the gastric pouch was detected. A CT scan clearly shows a fundoplication ring around the esophagus (two-thirds) and the upper part of the gastric pouch (one-third).

CONCLUSION

The surgical technique of primary modified fundoplication using the excluded stomach with simultaneous gastric bypass is feasible.

Esophageal function and non-acid reflux evaluated by impedance-24 h-pH-metry, high-resolution manometry, and gastroscopy after one-anastomosis gastric bypass-outcomes of a prospective mid-term study

BACKGROUND

One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) is the third most common bariatric operation for patients with obesity worldwide. One concern about OAGB is the presence of acid and non-acid reflux in a mid- and long-term follow-up. The aim of this study was to objectively evaluate reflux and esophagus motility by comparing preoperative and postoperative mid-term outcomes.

SETTING

Cross-sectional study; University-hospital based.

METHODS

This study includes primary OAGB patients (preoperative gastroscopy, high-resolution manometry (HRM), and impedance-24 h-pH-metry) operated at Medical University of Vienna before 31st December 2017. After a mean follow-up of 5.1 ± 2.3 years, these examinations were repeated. In addition, history of weight, remission of associated medical problems (AMP), and quality of life (QOL) were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 21 patients were included in this study and went through all examinations. Preoperative weight was 124.4 ± 17.3 kg with a BMI of 44.7 ± 5.6 kg/m², total weight loss after 5.1 ± 2.3 years was 34.4 ± 8.3%. In addition, remission of AMP and QOL outcomes were very satisfactory in this study. In gastroscopy, anastomositis, esophagitis, Barrett´s esophagus, and bile in the pouch were found in: 38.1%, 28.3%, 9.5%, and 42.9%. Results of HRM of the lower esophageal sphincter pressure were 28.0 ± 15.6 mmHg, which are unchanged compared to preoperative values. Nevertheless, in the impedance-24 h-pH-metry, acid exposure time and DeMeester score decreased significantly to 1.2 ± 1.2% (p = 0.004) and 7.5 ± 8.9 (p = 0.017). Further, the total number of refluxes were equal to preoperative; however, the decreased acid refluxes were replaced by non-acid refluxes.

CONCLUSION

This study has shown decreased rates of acid reflux and increased non-acid reflux after a mid-term outcome of primary OAGB patients. Gastroscopy showed signs of chronic irritation of the gastrojejunostomy, pouch, and distal esophagus, even in asymptomatic patients. Follow-up gastroscopies in OAGB patients after 5 years may be considered.

Endoscopic revision of one-anastomosis gastric bypass (ER-OAGB) for weight recurrence: a case series of 17 adults

Weight recurrence after one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), the third most common metabolic and bariatric surgery performed worldwide, is observed in a subset of patients due to the chronic, progressive nature of obesity. Endoscopic revision of the OAGB (ER-OAGB) through full-thickness suturing to reduce the gastrojejunal anastomosis and gastric pouch is a potential alternative to surgical revision. Here, we present a case series of ER-OAGB and long-term nutritional support at two international centers with expertise in bariatric endoscopy. Data were retrospectively evaluated from a prospectively maintained database. The primary outcome was total body weight loss (TBWL) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included TBWL at 3, 6, and 15 months; excess weight loss (EWL) at 3, 6, 12, and 15 months; frequency of new/worsening symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); and the frequency of serious adverse events. In this series, 17 adults (70.6% female, mean age 46.8 years, mean BMI 39.1 kg/m2) successfully underwent ER-OAGB an average of 8 years (range 2-21 years) after OAGB for a mean weight recurrence of 43.2% (range 10.9-86.9%). TBWL from ER-OAGB was 9.7 ± 1.8% at 3 months, 13.4 ± 3.5% at 6 months, 18.5 ± 2.1% at 12 months, and 18.1 ± 2.2% at 15 months. EWL from ER-OAGB was 30.5 ± 14.7% at 3 months, 42.6 ± 16.2% at 6 months, 54.2 ± 11.3% at 12 months, and 54.2 ± 11.7% at 15 months. There were no instances of new/worsening GERD symptoms or serious adverse events. In this small series of adults who experienced weight recurrence after OAGB, ER-OAGB facilitated safe and clinically meaningful weight loss, without new or worsening GERD symptoms, when performed by experienced bariatric endoscopists in concert with longitudinal nutritional support.

Intrathoracic pouch migration in one-anastomosis gastric bypass with and without hiatoplasty: A 3-dimensional-computed tomography volumetry study

BACKGROUND

Currently, 4.8% of bariatric operations worldwide are one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) procedures. If a hiatal hernia is detected in a preoperative gastroscopy, OAGB can be combined with hiatoplasty. Intrathoracic pouch migration (ITM) is common after bypass procedures because the fundus, a natural abutment, is separated from the pouch.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to find out whether OAGB or OAGB combined with hiatoplasty carries a higher risk of ITM and, therefore, also gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

SETTING

University hospital.

METHODS

Fifty patients (group 1: 25× primary OAGB; group 2: 25× primary OAGB with hiatoplasty) were included in this study. History of weight, GERD, and quality of life were recorded in patient interviews and pouch volume and ITM were evaluated using 3-dimensional-computed tomography volumetry.

RESULTS

There were no differences in terms of patient characteristics, history of weight, pouch volume, or quality of life between both groups. ITM was found in group 1 in 60% (n = 15) and group 2 in 76% (n = 19) of all patients (P = .152). The ITM mean length was significantly lower in group 1 with .9 ± 1.1 cm than in group 2 with 1.8 ± 1.2 cm (P = .007). Regarding GERD, there was no difference between both groups; nevertheless, significantly more patients with ITM (38.2%; n = 13) had GERD compared with patients without ITM (6.3%; n = 1).

CONCLUSION

In primary OAGB, an additional hiatoplasty was not associated with higher rates of ITM or GERD; nevertheless, the length of ITM was higher after hiatoplasty. If ITM occurs, patients have a risk of developing GERD.

Ten-year outcome of one-anastomosis gastric bypass with a biliopancreatic limb of 150 cm versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a single-institution series of 940 patients

BACKGROUND

Long-term outcomes of one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) need to be compared with those of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).

OBJECTIVE

The present study evaluates the long-term outcomes at 10-year follow-up of OAGB with a biliopancreatic limb of 150 cm versus RYGB.

SETTING

Private practice, France.

METHODS

Data of patients who underwent OAGB or RYGB as primary or secondary procedures between 2010 and 2011 at a referral center were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

A total of 940 patients underwent OAGB (n = 405) or RYGB (n = 535). Operative time was significantly shorter in the OAGB group. Postoperative morbidity occurred in 17.2% of patients after RYGB versus 8.1% after OAGB (P ≤ .0001). Patients in the RYGB group had a significantly higher rate of kinking of the jejuno-jejunal anastomosis, stenosis of the gastrojejunal anastomosis, and dysphagia for early ulcers. At long term, no differences were found in the rate of severe malnutrition. Cumulated morbidity was significantly higher after RYGB, with higher incidence of internal hernia, anastomotic ulcer, blind-loop syndrome, and hypoglycemia. Conversion to RYGB and laparoscopic exploration for chronic pain were more frequent after OAGB. Surgery for weight regain was significantly more frequent after RYGB. Patients in the OAGB group had significantly lower weight, body mass index, and greater percentage excess, and total weight losses at 120 months. No significant differences were detected in co-morbidity outcomes.

CONCLUSION

After 10 years, both RYGB and OAGB are effective procedures. However, OAGB is associated with shorter operative times and better results in short- and long-term morbidity and weight loss outcomes.

Bile or Acid Reflux Post One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: What Must We Do? Still an Unsolved Enigma

Obesity is a global scourge, affecting over 15% of the world's population [...].

One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Revision for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Long Versus Short Biliopancreatic Limb Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

PURPOSE

One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) may be associated with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The nature of this GERD remains unclear. This complication can be treated either with an additional enteroenterostomy without shortening of gastric pouch (long biliopancreatic limb Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (L-BPL-RYGB)) or revision to conventional short biliopancreatic limb Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (S-BPL-RYGB). The objective of this study is to compare the aforementioned procedures in terms of efficacy on GERD symptoms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis between October 2012 and June 2020.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients underwent OAGB revision to S-BPL-RYGB (n = 21) or L-BPL-RYGB (n = 31) secondary to GERD. Investigation with pH impedance prior to revision was performed in 15 patients showing biliary reflux (BR) in 7 (46.6%), acid reflux (AR) in 6 (40%), and no confirmation in 2. Patients with AR had a revision to S-BPL-RYGB, whereas patients with BR underwent L-BPL-RYGB. Among the patients without pH metry results (n = 37), S-BPL-RYGB was performed for associated disabling digestive disorders or nutritional deficiencies. GERD was treated in 68% of patients with L-BPL-RYGB versus 95% of patients after S-BPL-RYGB. Patients, whose decision for revisional procedure was based on the results of pH impedance testing, did not reveal refractory GERD.

CONCLUSION

L-BPL-RYGB seems appropriate in patients with BR, whereas conversion to S-BPL-RYGB should be preferred if AR is present.

Revisional One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass with a 150-cm Biliopancreatic Limb After Failure of Adjustable Gastric Banding: Mid-Term Outcomes and Comparison Between One- and Two-Stage Approaches

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) was a common procedure worldwide but associated with a high rate of long-term failure. This study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of conversion to one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) after failed LAGB.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We undertook a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database in a tertiary referral center for bariatric surgery. All cases of revisional OAGB with a biliopancreatic limb (BPL) of 150 cm after failed LAGB performed between 2010 and 2016 were analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall, 215 patients underwent conversion from LAGB to OAGB. Indication for surgery was primary weight loss (WL) failure in 30.7% of cases and long-term complications in the remaining patients, with or without associated weight regain. At the time of OAGB, the mean age was 43.2 ± 10.5 years and the mean BMI was 42 ± 6.9. Overall postoperative morbidity was 13.5%. The postoperative abscess ± leak rate was 5.9% in the overall population. Two years after OAGB, 9.7% of patients were lost to follow-up, % excess weight loss (EWL) was 88.2 ± 23.9, and % total weight loss (TWL) was 38.7 ± 9.3. At 5 years, 16.6% of patients were lost to follow-up, %EWL was 82.4 ± 25, and %TWL was 36.1 ± 10. There was no statistical difference in complication rates or WL results between the one-stage and two-stage approaches.

CONCLUSION

OAGB with a 150-cm BPL represents a safe and effective option after failed LAGB. Both synchronous OAGB and two-step revisional OAGB guarantee satisfying results in terms of postoperative morbidity and WL outcomes.