Quality assessment using EQ-5D-5L after lung surgery for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients

Cost-Utility Analysis of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Versus Surgery for Patients With Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Japan

PURPOSE

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for patients with operable stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is less invasive than surgery. However, differences in lifetime costs and patient outcomes remain unclear. In this study, a cost-utility analysis of SBRT compared with surgery for Japanese patients with operable stage I NSCLC was conducted.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A partitioned survival model was constructed using each treatment arm's overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) data. The data for the SBRT arm were extracted from the Japanese multicenter cohort study, which enrolled 678 medically operable patients with stage I NSCLC, and patient registry data were used for the surgery arm. The 5-year OS rate was 78.2% for SBRT and 74.8% for surgery from both studies. The 5-year PFS rate was 57.0% for SBRT and 63.4% for surgery. The quality of life values of PFS and progressive disease were obtained from domestic and overseas literature (PFS: 0.74, progressive disease: 0.65). The time horizon was set to 10 years. The expected costs and quality-adjusted life years for each treatment group were calculated. All costs are expressed in Japanese yen converted to US dollars (USD).

RESULTS

SBRT was the dominant strategy, reducing treatment costs by 4,443.8 USD and increasing quality-adjusted life years by 0.131 compared with surgery. According to probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the probability of SBRT being dominant and cost-effective was 50.6% and 72.4%, respectively. Under the budget impact analysis, the total savings for the patients with stage I NSCLC in Japan was 6,252,870.0 USD (n = 1,407).

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT is a more cost-effective option than surgery in patients with medically operable stage I NSCLC in Japan. Large-scale epidemiologic studies that reflect the latest clinical realities, such as OS/PFS, will be needed to validate this study's robustness.

Preoperative quality of life predicts complications in thoracic surgery: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Patients undergoing thoracic surgery experience high complication rates. It is uncertain whether preoperative health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measurements can predict patients at higher risk for postoperative complications. The objective of this study was to determine the association between preoperative HRQOL and postoperative complications among patients undergoing thoracic surgery.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data. Consecutive patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery at a Canadian tertiary care centre between January 2018 and January 2019 were included. Patient HRQOL was measured using the Euroqol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) survey. Complications were recorded using the Ottawa Thoracic Morbidity and Mortality system. Uni- and multivariable analysis were performed.

RESULTS

Of 515 surgeries performed, 133 (25.8%) patients experienced at least 1 postoperative complication; 345 (67.0%) patients underwent surgery for malignancy. A range of 271 (52.7%) to 310 (60.2%) patients experienced pain/discomfort at each timepoint. On multivariable analysis, lower preoperative EQ-5D visual analogue scale scores were significantly associated with postoperative complications (adjusted odds ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.95-0.99; P = 0.01). Presence of malignancy was not independently associated with complications (P = 0.68).

CONCLUSIONS

Self-reported preoperative HRQOL can predict incidence of postoperative complications among patients undergoing thoracic surgery. Assessments of preoperative HRQOL may help identify patients at higher risk for developing complications. These findings could be used to direct preoperative risk-mitigation strategies in areas of HRQOL where patients suffer most, such as pain. The full perioperative trajectory of patient HRQOL should be discerned to identify subsets of patients who share common risk factors.

Impact of Spinal CSF Leaks on Quality of Life and Mental Health and Long-Term Reversal by Surgical Closure

Background and Objectives

Spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) caused by a spinal CSF leak is a multisymptom syndrome, which can dramatically affect physical and mental health. However, systematic data on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and mental health are scarce. We hypothesized that surgical treatment leads to significant and sustained improvements in HRQoL and mental health in patients with SIH.

Methods

In this single-center cohort study, we prospectively collected HRQoL and mental health data in patients undergoing surgical closure of a spinal CSF leak from September 2020 to November 2022. EuroQoL (EQ-5D-5L), including the health state index (EQ-Index) and the visual analog scale (EQ-VAS), measured HRQoL. The 21-item version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21) measured symptoms of mental health. Follow-ups were performed 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Primary outcome was the change in EQ-Index, EQ-VAS, and DASS-21 subscales. Secondary outcome was the impact of baseline depression symptoms on HRQoL outcomes following surgery.

Results

Seventy-four patients were included. EQ-VAS improved from 40 (interquartile range [IQR] 30-60) preoperatively to 70 (IQR 55-85) at 3 months and to 72 (IQR 60-88) at 6 months postoperatively (p < 0.001, respectively). EQ-Index increased from 0.683 (IQR 0.374-0.799) to 0.877 (0.740-0.943) at 3 months and to 0.907 (0.780-0.956) at 6 months postoperatively (p < 0.001, respectively). Depression, anxiety, and stress significantly improved after surgery. Preoperative depressive symptoms did not affect the HRQoL outcome.

Discussion

The severe impact of a spinal CSF leak on HRQoL and mental health significantly improved after closure of the leak. Higher levels of depressive symptoms do not predict worse outcomes and should not discourage invasive treatment. Further systematic evaluation of outcomes, with special regard to quality of life, is needed, as it allows a comparison of symptom burden between SIH and more familiar diseases as well as a comparison of different treatment modalities in future studies.

Comparing Discrete Choice Experiment with Swing Weighting to Estimate Attribute Relative Importance: A Case Study in Lung Cancer Patient Preferences

INTRODUCTION

Discrete choice experiments (DCE) are commonly used to elicit patient preferences and to determine the relative importance of attributes but can be complex and costly to administer. Simpler methods that measure relative importance exist, such as swing weighting with direct rating (SW-DR), but there is little empirical evidence comparing the two. This study aimed to directly compare attribute relative importance rankings and weights elicited using a DCE and SW-DR.

METHODS

A total of 307 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer in Italy and Belgium completed an online survey assessing preferences for cancer treatment using DCE and SW-DR. The relative importance of the attributes was determined using a random parameter logit model for the DCE and rank order centroid method (ROC) for SW-DR. Differences in relative importance ranking and weights between the methods were assessed using Cohen's weighted kappa and Dirichlet regression. Feedback on ease of understanding and answering the 2 tasks was also collected.

RESULTS

Most respondents (>65%) found both tasks (very) easy to understand and answer. The same attribute, survival, was ranked most important irrespective of the methods applied. The overall ranking of the attributes on an aggregate level differed significantly between DCE and SW-ROC (P < 0.01). Greater differences in attribute weights between attributes were reported in DCE compared with SW-DR (P < 0.01). Agreement between the individual-level attribute ranking across methods was moderate (weighted Kappa 0.53-0.55).

CONCLUSION

Significant differences in attribute importance between DCE and SW-DR were found. Respondents reported both methods being relatively easy to understand and answer. Further studies confirming these findings are warranted. Such studies will help to provide accurate guidance for methods selection when studying relative attribute importance across a wide array of preference-relevant decisions.

HIGHLIGHTS

Both DCEs and SW tasks can be used to determine attribute relative importance rankings and weights; however, little evidence exists empirically comparing these methods in terms of outcomes or respondent usability.Most respondents found the DCE and SW tasks very easy or easy to understand and answer.A direct comparison of DCE and SW found significant differences in attribute importance rankings and weights as well as a greater spread in the DCE-derived attribute relative importance weights.

Health State Utility Values in Early-Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the predominant histological subtype of lung cancer and is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. Quality of life is an important consideration for patients and current treatments can adversely affect health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this systematic literature review (SLR) were to identify and provide a comprehensive catalogue of published health state utility values (HSUVs) in patients with early-stage NSCLC and to understand the factors impacting on HSUVs in this indication.

METHODS

Electronic searches of Embase, MEDLINE and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews were conducted via the Ovid platform in March 2021 and June 2022 and were supplemented by grey literature searches of conference proceedings, reference lists, health technology assessment bodies, and other relevant sources. Eligibility criteria were based on patients with early-stage (stage I-III) resectable NSCLC receiving treatment in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting. No restriction was placed on interventions or comparators, geography, or publication date. English language publications or non-English language publications with an English abstract were of primary interest. A validated checklist was applied to conduct quality assessment of the full publications.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine publications (27 full publications and two conference abstracts) met all eligibility criteria and reported 217 HSUVs and seven disutilities associated with patients with early NSCLC. The data showed that increasing disease stage is associated with decreasing HRQoL. It was also indicated that utility values vary by treatment approach; however, the choice of treatment may be influenced by the patients' disease stage at presentation. Few studies aligned with the requirements of health technology assessment (HTA) bodies, indicating a need for future studies to conform to these preferences, making them suitable for use in economic evaluations.

CONCLUSIONS

This SLR found that disease stage and treatment approach were two of several factors that can impact patient-reported HRQoL. Additional studies are warranted to confirm these findings and to investigate emerging therapies for early NSCLC. In collecting a catalogue of HSUV data, this SLR has begun to identify the challenges associated with identifying reliable utility value estimates suitable for use in economic evaluations of early NSCLC.

Patient preferences, regret, and health-related quality of life among older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: A pilot longitudinal study

INTRODUCTION

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with poor outcomes and is generally incurable. Therefore, understanding preferences of older adults with AML is critical. We sought to assess whether best-worst scaling (BWS) can be used to capture attributes considered by older adults with AML when making initial treatment decisions and longitudinally, as well as assess changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and decisional regret over time.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a longitudinal study for adults ≥60 years with newly diagnosed AML, we collected: (1) attributes of treatment most important to patients using BWS, (2) HRQoL using EQ-5D-5L, (3) decisional regret using the Decisional Regret Scale, and (4) treatment worthiness using the "Was it worth it?" questionnaire. Data was collected at baseline and over six months. A hierarchical Bayes model was used to allocate percentages out of 100%. Due to small sample size, hypothesis testing was performed at α = 0.10 (2-tailed). We analyzed how these measures differed by treatment choice (intensive vs. lower intensity treatment).

RESULTS

Mean age of patients was 76 years (n = 15). At baseline, the most important attributes of treatment to patients were response to treatment (i.e., chance that the cancer will respond to treatment; 20.9%). Compared to those who received lower intensity treatment (n = 7) or best supportive care (n = 2), those who received intensive treatment (n = 6) generally ranked "alive one year or more after treatment" (p = 0.03) with higher importance and ranked "daily activities" (p = 0.01) and "location of treatment" (p = 0.01) with less importance. Overall, HRQoL scores were high. Decisional regret was mild overall and lower for patients who chose intensive treatment (p = 0.06).

DISCUSSION

We demonstrated that BWS can be used to assess the importance of various treatment attributes considered by older adults with AML when making initial treatment decisions and longitudinally throughout treatment. Attributes of treatment important to older patients with AML differed between treatment groups and changed over time. Interventions are needed to re-assess patient priorities throughout treatment to ensure care aligns with patient preferences.

Current standard values of health utility scores for evaluating cost-effectiveness in liver disease: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Health utility assessments have been developed for various conditions, including chronic liver disease. Health utility scores are required for socio-economic evaluations, which can aid the distribution of national budgets. However, the standard health utility assessment scores for specific health conditions are largely unknown.

AIM

To summarize the health utility scores, including the EuroQOL 5-dimensions 5-levels (EQ-5D-5L), EuroQol-visual analogue scale, short from-36 (SF-36), RAND-36, and Health Utilities Index (HUI)-Mark2/Mark3 scores, for the normal population and chronic liver disease patients.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of PubMed and MEDLINE, including the Cochrane Library, was performed. Meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan software. Multiple means and standard deviations were combined using the StatsToDo online web program.

RESULTS

The EQ-5D-5L and SF-36 can be used for health utility evaluations during antiviral therapy for hepatitis C. HUI-Mark2/Mark3 indicated that the health utility scores of hepatitis B patients are roughly 30% better than those of hepatitis C patients.

CONCLUSION

The EQ-5D-5L is the most popular questionnaire for health utility assessments. Health assessments that allow free registration would be useful for evaluating health utility in patients with liver disease.

Health-related quality of life in patients with neurofibromatosis 1 in Japan: A questionnaire survey using EQ-5D-5L

Neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) is a genetic disorder characterized by various symptoms including dermatological, neurological, and osseous manifestations. These complications often cause cosmetic or functional disturbances, resulting in a significant impact on quality of life (QOL). However, there are limited data on QOL of individuals with NF1 in Japan. Therefore, we studied health-related QOL in patients with NF1 compared with that in general populations and the association with severity grade using EQ-5D. A cross-sectional study was conducted for 73 adult NF1 patients (26 males and 47 females; mean age, 44.16 years). The EQ-5D-5L values and visual analog scale (VAS) in patients with NF1 were 0.738 ± 0.137 and 69.93 ± 19.14, respectively. Both scores were significantly lower in patients with NF1 than in healthy volunteers (p < 0.0001). The score for anxiety/depression was the highest among the five items of EQ-5D. Although we investigated differences in the index value and VAS between stage 2 or less and stage 3 or higher, there was no difference in the scores between groups related to certification criteria for the public medical expenses subsidy system. EQ-5D-5L is a valuable assessment tool for health-related QOL in patients with NF1, but it might not be sufficient for severity certification of NF1 in Japan. We would need the revision of the current certification based on the patients' demand in the future. Our findings might be useful for assessment of therapeutic effects and appropriate resource allocation in the care of patients with NF1.

Comparative effectiveness of smartphone healthcare applications for improving quality of life in lung cancer patients: study protocol

BACKGROUND

Although pulmonary rehabilitation is helpful for patients following lung cancer surgery, rehabilitation is not widely available, due in part to a lack of medical resources. Recent developments in digital health care have overcome the space limitations associated with in-person health care. This study will evaluate and compare the efficacy of three different smartphone healthcare systems in patients with lung cancer.

METHODS

This single center randomized controlled study is designed to evaluate the efficacy of digital healthcare applications for lung cancer patients after thoracoscopic lung resection. A total of 320 patients will be enrolled and randomized 1:1:1:1 into four different groups, with one group each using the smartphone applications NOOM, Walkon, and Efilcare and the fourth being the control group without intervention. Questionnaires will be administered to patients at baseline and after 3, 6, and 12 months. The primary endpoint will be the score on the EuroQol five-dimension index. Secondary endpoints will include other questionnaires about quality of life and dyspnea.

DISCUSSION

This prospective randomized controlled study may allow assessments and comparisons of the efficacy of various smartphone applications in patients who undergo lung cancer surgery. This process may enable the introduction of healthcare interventions that maintain quality of life in patients with lung cancer. Trial registration CRIS, KCT0005447. Registered 06 October 2020, https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do/19346.

Pre-operative Physical Performance Is Associated With Early Return to Work in Peri-operative Lung Cancer Patients

Little is known about the factors related to return to work (RTW) in patients with peri-operative lung cancer (LC). This study aimed to investigate whether pre-operative physical performance is associated with early RTW in patients with peri-operative LC. A total of 59 patients who wished to resume work after lung resection surgery were included and were divided into three groups: early RTW (within 14 days after discharge), delayed RTW (within 15-90 days), and non-RTW (failure of RTW within 90 days). The early RTW group had significantly lower scores on the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (mMRC) and significantly higher scores on the Euro Quality of Life 5-Dimension 3-Level (EQ-5D-3L) than the non-RTW group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that EQ-5D-3L scores were significantly associated with early RTW, and mMRC scores and knee extensor strength tended to be associated with early RTW. Better pre-operative quality of life, mild dyspnea, and greater lower limb muscle strength tended to be associated with early RTW in patients with peri-operative LC.

Relationship Between Physical Function and Health Utility in Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

PURPOSE

Health utility, which is a measure of patient-reported outcome (PRO), has recently been used in health-related quality of life for patients with various cancers. However, the relationship between health utility and the physical function and of patients undergoing pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) as surgical treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has not been reported in the perioperative and convalescent phases. This study aimed to evaluate the perioperative and postoperative health utility of patients undergoing P/D for MPM at one year postoperatively and to examine the relationship with physical function.

METHODS

We included patients underwent P/D. Grip strength, knee extension strength, 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), forced vital capacity (FVC), and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) were measured to assess physical function, and the Short-Form Six-Dimension (SF-6D) was completed to assess health utility. These assessments were performed preoperatively, postoperatively, and one year postoperatively. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance for comparison of pre and postoperative and one year mean values.

RESULTS

There were 24 subjects (23 males, 65.5±8.3 year). SF-6D, 6MWD, FVC, and FEV1 values one year operatively improved significantly compared with postoperative. Additionally, SF-6D was correlated with 6MWD.

CONCLUSION

Health utility were also correlated with exercise capacity.

Choosing the right survey: the lung cancer surgery

Radical and palliative treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have faced a significant evolution during last decades, which in turn has modified their effects on the patient quality of life (QoL). QoL data collection is becoming methodologically rigorous, with published recommendations and societal statements. In lung cancer surgery, there is no standardization in collecting and analyzing this outcome yet. However, to face the evolution in lung cancer therapies, few initiatives like the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) lung cancer module update project or the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), have now the potential to help thoracic surgeons to collect QoL data with validated dynamic instruments to make this outcome comparable to the clinical ones. This review aims to give an overview of the available and most commonly used QoL questionnaires in lung cancer surgery in order to facilitate future research and practical implementation.