Coagulation ability when separating from cardiopulmonary bypass with and without fresh frozen plasma: a pilot study

A review and analysis of outcomes in randomized clinical trials of plasma transfusion in patients with bleeding or for the prevention of bleeding: The BEST collaborative study

BACKGROUND

Previous systematic reviews have revealed an inconsistency of outcome definitions as a major barrier in providing evidence-based guidance for the use of plasma transfusion to prevent or treat bleeding. We reviewed and analyzed outcomes in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to provide a methodology for describing and classifying outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

RCTs involving transfusion of plasma published after 2000 were identified from a prior review (Yang 2012) and combined with an updated systematic literature search of multiple databases (July 1, 2011 to January 17, 2023). Inclusion of publications, data extraction, and risk of bias assessments were performed in duplicate. (PROSPERO registration number is: CRD42020158581).

RESULTS

In total, 5579 citations were identified in the new systematic search and 22 were included. Six additional trials were identified from the previous review, resulting in a total of 28 trials: 23 therapeutic and five prophylactic studies. An increasing number of studies in the setting of major bleeding such as in cardiovascular surgery and trauma were identified. Eighty-seven outcomes were reported with a mean of 11 (min-max. 4-32) per study. There was substantial variation in outcomes used with a preponderance of surrogate measures for clinical effect such as laboratory parameters and blood usage.

CONCLUSION

There is an expanding literature on plasma transfusion to inform guidelines. However, considerable heterogeneity of reported outcomes constrains comparisons. A core outcome set should be developed for plasma transfusion studies. Standardization of outcomes will motivate better study design, facilitate comparison, and improve clinical relevance for future trials of plasma transfusion.

Plasma: indications, controversies, and opportunities

Plasma is overused as a blood product worldwide; however, data supporting appropriate use of plasma is scant. Its most common utilization is for treatment of coagulopathy in actively bleeding patients; it is also used for coagulation optimization prior to procedures with specific coagulation profile targets. A baseline literature review in PUBMED and Google Scholar was done (1 January 2000 to 1 June 2023), utilizing the following search terms: plasma, fresh frozen plasma, lyophilized plasma, indications, massive transfusion protocol, liver disease, warfarin reversal, cardiothoracic surgery, INR < 2. An initial review of the titles and abstracts excluded all articles that were not focused on transfusional medicine. Additional references were obtained from citations within the retrieved articles. This narrative review discusses the main indications for appropriate plasma use, mainly coagulation factor replacement, major hemorrhage protocol, coagulopathy in liver disease, bleeding in the setting of vitamin K antagonists, among others. The correlation between concentration of coagulation factors and INR, as well as the proper plasma dosing with its volume being weight-based, is also discussed. A high value approach to plasma utilization is supported with a review of the clinical situations where plasma is overutilized or unnecessary. Finally, a discussion of novel plasma products is presented for enhanced awareness.

Isovolemic filter-based therapeutic plasma-exchange with fresh frozen plasma is associated with minimal thromboelastometric changes in noncoagulopathic patients

The aim of this study was to assess the effects of isovolemic therapeutic plasma-exchange using fresh frozen plasma on coagulations parameters assessed by standard coagulation tests and rotational thromboelastometry in noncoagulopathic patients. Twenty patients who underwent isovolemic filter-based therapeutic plasma-exchange of approximately 1.5 plasma volume per session were included in the current study. Standard coagulation tests and rotational thromboelastometry (ExTEM, InTEM, FibTEM and ApTEM) were performed 30 min before and after the procedure. Isovolemic therapeutic plasma-exchange was associated with decreased fibrinogen levels (P = 0.01). Thromboelastometric assay demonstrated an increased clotting time in both ExTEM (P = 0.03) and InTEM (P = 0.01) and a decreased thrombodynamic potential index in ExTEM (P = 0.03). No significant difference in FibTEM maximum clot firmness was recorded (P = 0.41). Therapeutic plasma-exchange in noncoagulopathic patients is associated with minimal changes in thromboelastometric parameters, mainly by an increase in clotting time in both intrinsic and extrinsic pathways.