1
|
[Development and principles of intramedullary and extramedullary segmental bone transport: overview and clinical results]. UNFALLCHIRURGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2023; 126:190-199. [PMID: 36692524 DOI: 10.1007/s00113-022-01285-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Segmental bone transport using intramedullary or extramedullary techniques is one of the most commonly used procedures for bone defect management in the diaphyseal region of long bones. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this work is to provide an overview of the historical development and general principles as well as the current status of extramedullary and intramedullary techniques of bone segment transport. In addition, own results on internal segmental bone transport are presented. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective database analysis included all patients between May 2019 and January 2021 who underwent segmental bone transport via a fully implantable intramedullary segment transport nail system. In addition to the radiological outcome, the clinical outcome was assessed using the lower extremity functional scale (LEFS). RESULTS A total of 9 patients (8 male, 1 female; age 41.7 ± 3.9 years) could be included. The cause of the segmental bone defect was chronic fracture-related infection in all cases. The segmental defect size was 62 ± 10 mm. Sufficient bridging of the bone defect was achieved in all patients, with a mean distraction rate of 0.9 ± 0.1 mm per day. Bony consolidation of the regeneration was achieved after 292 ± 57 days, and final bony consolidation of the docking zone was achieved after 469 ± 116 days. At 22 ± 3 months after implantation of the segmental transport nail, the LEFS demonstrated a result of 59 ± 4 points. No recurrence of infection or regeneration failure occurred. CONCLUSION The aim of treating segmental bone defects, in addition to reconstructing a load-bearing bone, is to restore correct joint angles, leg length, and leg axis without torsional deviation and can be achieved via classical external segmental bone transport. In recent years, internal segmental bone transport has been developed as an alternative. It remains to be seen whether the preliminary and reproducibly good clinical and radiological results of segmental transport nails can be confirmed for widespread use in the future.
Collapse
|
2
|
Kern T. Managing Bone Defects in the Femur With a Motorized Intramedullary Bone Transport Nail: Case Review With Follow-Up. J Orthop Trauma 2021; 35:S8-S12. [PMID: 34533480 DOI: 10.1097/bot.0000000000002120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
SUMMARY Bone transport is an effective treatment for segmental bone defects. Until now, the need for external fixation, at least during the transport phase, has been a major disadvantage. New developments such as the bone transport nail allow an all-internal bone transport. A segment transport nail and the therapy regimen are described, and first cases are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Kern
- Department of Septic and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Murnau, Murnau, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ma Y, Yin Q, Wu Y, Wang Z, Sun Z, Gu S, Rui Y, Han X. Retraction of transporting bone segment during Ilizarov bone transport. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2020; 21:704. [PMID: 33106160 PMCID: PMC7590790 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03702-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Retraction of transporting bone segment (TBS) may occur when the fixator of the TBS is removed prior to full consolidation of the distracted callus, which has adverse effect on the healing of the docking site. However, there are few reports on the retraction of TBS. The purpose of this study is to analyze the causes and risk factors of the retraction of TBS. METHODS The clinical data of 37 cases with tibial bone defect treated by Ilizarov bone transport were analyzed retrospectively, in whom the TBS fixator was removed prior to full consolidation of the distracted callus and union of the docking site. Bivariate correlation was used to analyze relationship between the retraction distance of TBS and potential risk factors including age, gender, course, length of bone defect, number of operations, size of TBS, transport distance, timing and time interval of removal of TBS fixator. Risk factors with significant level were further identified using multivariate linear regression. RESULTS Bivariate correlation showed that the timing of removal was negatively correlated with the retraction distance, and the time interval and transport distance were positively correlated with the retraction distance(p < 0.05), the age, gender, course, length of bone defect, size of TBS and number of operations were not correlated with the retraction distance(p > 0.05). Multivariate linear regression of the 3 risk factors showed that the timing of removal and time interval were the main risk factors affecting the retraction distance (p < 0.05), but the transport distance was not (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION The traction forces of TBS endured from the soft tissues and the unconsolidated distracted callus have elastic properties, which can make retraction of TBS. The timing of removal and time interval are the main risk factors of the retraction of TBS. In the case of early removal, another external fixation or quickly converted to internal fixation should be performed to avoid the adverse effect of more retraction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunhong Ma
- Department of Orthopaedics, Wuxi No. 9 People's Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, No. 999 Liangxi Road, Wuxi, 214062, Jiangsu, China
| | - Qudong Yin
- Department of Orthopaedics, Wuxi No. 9 People's Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, No. 999 Liangxi Road, Wuxi, 214062, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yongwei Wu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Wuxi No. 9 People's Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, No. 999 Liangxi Road, Wuxi, 214062, Jiangsu, China
| | - Zongnan Wang
- Department of Orthopaedics, Shuyang People's Hospital, Suqian, 223000, Jiangsu, China
| | - Zhenzhong Sun
- Department of Orthopaedics, Wuxi No. 9 People's Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, No. 999 Liangxi Road, Wuxi, 214062, Jiangsu, China
| | - Sanjun Gu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Wuxi No. 9 People's Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, No. 999 Liangxi Road, Wuxi, 214062, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yongjun Rui
- Department of Orthopaedics, Wuxi No. 9 People's Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, No. 999 Liangxi Road, Wuxi, 214062, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xiaofei Han
- Department of Orthopaedics, Wuxi No. 9 People's Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, No. 999 Liangxi Road, Wuxi, 214062, Jiangsu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Raven TF, Moghaddam A, Ermisch C, Westhauser F, Heller R, Bruckner T, Schmidmaier G. Use of Masquelet technique in treatment of septic and atrophic fracture nonunion. Injury 2019; 50 Suppl 3:40-54. [PMID: 31378541 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment of atrophic non-unions and large bone defects or infections remains a challenging task for the treating surgeon. In the herein study, we present our experience of the 'Masquelet technique' according to the 'diamond concept' for the treatment of complex long bone reconstruction procedures. METHODS Between February 2010 and March 2015, 150 patients (mean age 51.4) with atrophic and- /or infected non-unions were included in this prospective study. All patients received autologous bone graft, a graft expander (TCP (tricalcium phosphate)) and BMP (bone morphogenic protein). Clinical and radiological parameters were assessed at 6 weeks, and at 3, 6 and 12 months. The SF-12 questionnaire was used to evaluate the subjective health of patients. RESULTS A successful bony consolidation of the non-unions was observed in 120 (80%) cases with a median healing time of 12.1 months. The mean defect gap was 4.4cm. Initial infection was documented in 54 cases. The most frequently identified pathogen was staphylococcus epidermidis and staphylococcus aureus. A successful removal of microorganisms with subsequent healing was achieved in 39 cases (72%). The SF-12 scores of subjective physical and mental health increased from PCS 31.5 preoperatively to 36.7 one year postoperatively, while MCS increased from 45.5 to 48.7. CONCLUSIONS Our study showed that the Masquelet technique according to the 'diamond concept' is a valid method to treat complex atrophic non-unions with large bone defects and associated infection. Following the principles of the 'diamond concept' (targeted optimization of tissue engineering and bone regeneration) a high rate of success can be expected in these difficult reconstruction cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T F Raven
- ATORG - Aschaffenburg Trauma and Orthopaedic Research Group, Center for Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Hospital Aschaffenburg-Alzenau, Am Hasenkopf 1, D-63739, Aschaffenburg, Germany; HTRG - Heidelberg Trauma Research Group, Division of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Center for Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Spinal Cord Injury, University Hospital Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, D-69118, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - A Moghaddam
- ATORG - Aschaffenburg Trauma and Orthopaedic Research Group, Center for Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Hospital Aschaffenburg-Alzenau, Am Hasenkopf 1, D-63739, Aschaffenburg, Germany; HTRG - Heidelberg Trauma Research Group, Division of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Center for Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Spinal Cord Injury, University Hospital Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, D-69118, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Ermisch
- HTRG - Heidelberg Trauma Research Group, Division of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Center for Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Spinal Cord Injury, University Hospital Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, D-69118, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - F Westhauser
- HTRG - Heidelberg Trauma Research Group, Division of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Center for Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Spinal Cord Injury, University Hospital Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, D-69118, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - R Heller
- HTRG - Heidelberg Trauma Research Group, Division of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Center for Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Spinal Cord Injury, University Hospital Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, D-69118, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - T Bruckner
- Institute for Medical Biometry and Informatics, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, D- 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - G Schmidmaier
- HTRG - Heidelberg Trauma Research Group, Division of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Center for Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Spinal Cord Injury, University Hospital Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstraße 200a, D-69118, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|