The impact of scars on health-related quality of life after breast surgery: a qualitative exploration

Assessing the predictive accuracy of ChatGPT-based image analysis in forecasting long-term scar characteristics from 3-month assessments - A pilot study

INTRODUCTION

Scarring significantly impacts patient quality of life, yet traditional assessments often rely on subjective evaluations, resulting in variability in predictions. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive accuracy of a Smart Image Analysis ChatGPT model in forecasting scar characteristics.

METHODS

This single-institution prospective cohort study included 40 patients who underwent plastic surgery. Scar images were captured at 3 and 12 months, assessing characteristics such as vascularity, pigmentation, height, and width. The ChatGPT model predicted binary outcomes (good vs. bad scars) and continuous outcomes. Predictive accuracy was measured using metrics including mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), root mean squared error (RMSE), and R-squared (R²).

RESULTS

The model achieved an overall accuracy of 97.5% for binary classifications of scars. McNemar's test confirmed no significant differences between predicted and actual outcomes. For continuous outcomes, the MAE was 0.65, with an MSE of 0.9 and RMSE of 0.95, indicating moderate accuracy. Vascularity predictions yielded an R² of 0.234, whereas height and width showed stronger correlations with R² values of 0.857 and 0.956, respectively. Statistically significant differences in paired t-tests were observed for pigmentation (t = 4.356, p = 9.319e-05) and width (t = 2.896, p = 0.0062).

CONCLUSION

The Smart Image Analysis ChatGPT model demonstrates excellent predictive accuracy in binary scar classification and provides valuable insights for scar characteristics. Further refinement is necessary for improving predictions of dynamic features such as vascularity.

Impact of closed-incision negative pressure therapy in donor-site complications in DIEP flap breast reconstruction: Analysis of 705 patients and 1125 flaps

BACKGROUND

Closed-incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) has been shown to reduce complication rates in breast reconstruction (BR). This study aimed to evaluate postoperative outcomes in deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) donor-site incisions managed with ciNPT compared to standard dressings.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of patients ≥18 years who underwent DIEP flap BR from 2015 to 2023. Patients who underwent reconstruction with alternative flaps or converted to transverse rectus abdominus myocutaneous were excluded. Patients were categorized according to the use of ciNPT vs. standard dressings. The unpaired t- and Fisher's Exact tests were used to assess the differences between the groups. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 705 patients were included, with 68 (9.6%) managed with ciNPT. Patients treated with ciNPT had significantly higher mean body mass index (BMI) (34.0 vs. 28.5 kg/m2; p<0.001) compared to the control group. Higher rates of alcohol use (59.2% vs. 41.2%; p=0.006) and hormonal therapy use (41.3% vs. 17.9%; p<0.001) were found in the standard dressing group. Univariate analyses showed no significant differences in donor-site postoperative outcomes across the groups. However, multivariate logistic regression models demonstrated a reduced likelihood of surgical site infection (OR 0.187; 95% CI 0.045-0.768); p=0.020), and wound dehiscence (OR 0.338; 95% CI 0.155-0.738); p=0.006) among the ciNPT users. Particularly, in patients with BMI >30 kg/m2, ciNPT use (OR 0.282; 95% CI 0.098-0.812; p=0.019) was found to be a significant protective factor against wound complications compared to the standard of care.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that ciNPT may improve wound complication rates in DIEP flap donor sites, especially in patients with high BMI. Further research is necessary to elucidate the cost-effectiveness of ciNPT based on the patient risk profiles.

Beyond cancer treatment: dermo-aesthetic and other wellness recommendations for breast cancer patients

Breast cancer, a prevalent malignancy among women, has various physical and psychological impacts. This comprehensive review offers an in-depth look at multidisciplinary dermo-aesthetic intervention approaches, emphasizing the balance between oncological therapies and the management of these effects. The information presented spans specialties such as aesthetic medicine, plastic surgery, dermatology, physiotherapy, nutrition, odontology, and gynecology. This review, which serves as a clinical guide, aims to establish a safe protocol for non-medical interventions involving oncologists, physicians, and specialists from various areas in patients with breast cancer focused on improving their quality of life. This work offers personalized and integrative care strategies for the eradication of cancer. However, it is still necessary for patients to consult with their oncologist before undergoing any dermo aesthetic treatment. However, it is still necessary for patients to consult with their oncologist before undergoing any dermo aesthetic treatment.

Quality-of-Life Assessment in Patients Undergoing Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction for Moderate-Penetrance Gene-Related Breast Cancer

Background. Breast cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related death among women, with genetic mutations playing a key role. While high-penetrance mutations are well-studied, moderate-to-low-penetrance mutations, which present challenges in clinical decision-making and patient outcomes, are less understood. This study explores the quality of life of breast cancer patients with moderate-penetrance mutations, focusing on the psychosocial and physical consequences of mastectomy and reconstruction to improve patient-centered care. Materials and Methods. A cohort of 620 breast cancer patients treated at Regina Maria Private Health Network, Bucharest, between January 2022 and July 2024 was identified. From this group, 61 patients were selected based on the following criteria: (1) meeting NCCN genetic testing guidelines, (2) carrying moderate-to-low-penetrance mutations, (3) undergoing bilateral mastectomy with double reconstruction, and (4) agreeing to complete a modified version of the BREAST-Q questionnaire. Genetic testing was performed using a 125-gene next-generation sequencing panel. Statistical analyses included non-parametric tests to examine group differences and correlations. Results. Significant correlations were found between several factors. Emotional distress was positively correlated with concerns for family, while couple relationships and financial burden showed a strong positive association. Negative correlations were found between couple relationships and self-concept. Distress levels varied, with "Interference with personal relationships" causing more distress than "Impact on employment", and financial burden causing more distressing than impact on sexuality. Conclusions. Prophylactic mastectomy significantly reduces cancer risk for women with moderate-penetrance mutations. This study highlights the relationship between surgical choices and quality-of-life factors, advancing personalized prevention strategies and emphasizing patient-centered care.

The Impact of Scars After DIEP-Flap Breast Reconstruction on Satisfaction and HR-QoL: A Cross-Sectional Study Comparing BREAST-Q Scores

BACKGROUND

Although deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction is the most widely used technique for autologous breast reconstruction, this technique leads to large scars in visible areas on breast and abdomen. So far, limited studies have thoroughly addressed the impact of breast and abdominal scars on satisfaction and Health-related Quality of Life (HR-QoL).

OBJECTIVES

This research aimed to determine whether women with no/minor scar symptoms after undergoing DIEP-flap breast reconstruction differ in satisfaction and perceived HR-QoL from women with symptomatic scars.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional survey study, women who had previously undergone DIEP-flap breast reconstruction completed an online survey. Patient-reported scar quality was assessed with the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), and satisfaction and HR-QoL with BREAST-Q. Independent-samples t-tests were conducted to compare BREAST-Q scores between women with no/minor scar symptoms (POSAS overall opinion score 1-3) and women with symptomatic scars (POSAS overall opinion score 4-10).

RESULTS

A total of 248 women completed the survey. Women with scar symptoms had significantly worse BREAST-Q scores on 'Satisfaction with breasts,' 'Physical well-being,' 'Psychosocial well-being' and, 'Sexual well-being' compared to women with no/minor scar symptoms (p ≤ 0.001).

CONCLUSION

After DIEP-flap breast reconstructions, women with symptomatic breast and abdominal scars had a clinically relevant and statistically significant lower degree of satisfaction and HR-QoL compared to women who had no/minor scar symptoms. We therefore recommend to explicitly and repeatedly address inevitability of visible scars after DIEP-flap breast reconstruction, aiming to improve preoperative patient selection and post-operative expectation management.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Patient Perspectives of "Failure" in Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Literature: Points de vue des patients sur les «échecs» de la reconstruction mammaire: Revue systématique des publications sur l'aspect qualitatif

Introduction: The concept of failure in breast reconstruction can occur when negative outcomes dominate the patient experience. The primary objective of this review was to identify experiences of failure in breast reconstruction from the patient's perspective in the qualitative literature. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, Psychinfo, Emcare, and CINAHL were searched on July 31, 2023 using terms related to breast reconstruction and qualitative research. Thematic analysis was performed on direct quotations from included studies. Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative (CERQual) Research was used to assess confidence of the final findings. Results: Forty-two studies were identified. The following themes were identified in breast reconstruction failure: (1) failure occurs when expectations of restoring the original breast are not met with reconstruction, (2) failure occurs when unexpected outcomes were associated with the reconstruction, and (3) healthcare providers negatively impact the experience of breast reconstruction failure through lack of transparency when educating patients on expected results and poor relational support in the post-operative period. The evidence supporting themes 1-3 scored high confidence with CERQual. Conclusion: Breast reconstruction failure from the patient perspective arises from the limitations and adverse outcomes of the surgery. They may also arise even when the procedure was deemed "successful" from the surgeon's perspective. Dissatisfaction with result is increased by procedural complications. Healthcare providers can aggravate the perception of failure through inadequate patient education. Incorporating these perceptions of failure into discussions with patients can aid in their decision making.

'It's not meant to be for life, but it carries on': a qualitative investigation into the psychosocial needs of young retinoblastoma survivors

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN

Retinoblastoma (Rb) is a rare childhood eye cancer, with 45% of individuals impacted by heritable disease and the remainder impacted non-heritably. The condition can leave survivors with life-long psychological and social challenges. This qualitative study examined the psychosocial needs of teenagers and young adults living beyond Rb.

SETTING

A qualitative, exploratory study was conducted using focus groups with teenagers and interviews with young adults. Participants were recruited via the Childhood Eye Cancer Trust and the two national Rb treatment centres in the UK. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse data using exploratory and inductive methods.

PARTICIPANTS

32 young survivors of Rb (10 heritable, 21 non-heritable, 1 unknown; 23 unilateral, 9 bilateral) aged between 13 and 29 years (12 male, 20 female).

RESULTS

Data were rich and spanned the life course: three key themes were generated, containing eight subthemes. Theme 1 describes participants' experiences of childhood and trauma, including survivor guilt, memories from treatment and impact on personality. Theme 2 focuses on the challenges of adolescence, including the psychological impact of Rb, the impact on identity, and the sense of normality and adaptation to late effects. The third theme considered adulthood and the development of acceptance, a state of being widely considered unachievable during childhood, as well as the 'work' needed to feel supported, including seeking out information, peer support and therapeutic strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides in-depth insight into the experiences of life beyond Rb. Findings highlight the need for specific psychosocial interventions informed by codesign.

The marked body: Exploring experiences of post-mastectomy scarring, body image and change through artistic tattooing

Breast cancer has become the most prevalent cancer globally, predominantly affecting women, with mastectomy surgery a frequent treatment. Women often experience a discrepancy between their post-mastectomy body, and their former sense of self, affecting negatively on wellbeing. The narratives of eight women who chose to artistically tattoo over their mastectomy scars were explored in this study, through semi-structured interviews and Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). Seven master themes are presented. These themes follow the women from a state of disruption (of body image and gender identity) and surgical scarring as the first marking of the body, to the second marking of the body through artistic tattooing, bringing with it transformation, acceptance, feeling heard and connection with the artist, closure and control and the creation of significance and meaning. Viewed through Self-Discrepancy Theory, the findings of this study has implications for psycho-oncology and wellbeing support for women following mastectomy surgery.

Quality of Life in Chinese Youth Following Open Thyroid Surgery: A Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND

Because of the increased incidence of thyroid cancer and good survival rates and with research into scarless techniques, it is increasingly important to understand the quality of life of thyroid cancer patients and identify areas for improvement. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the importance of neck appearance after thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer survivors in China.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of scarring after open thyroid surgery on the quality of life of young patients.

METHODS

A descriptive qualitative design was used. Data were collected using face-to-face semistructured interviews and analyzed using directed content analysis.

RESULTS

Five men and 19 women participated in the study. The following 3 broad themes and 9 subthemes emerged, which were (1) emotional functioning, including low self-esteem due to high visibility of scars, concerns and helplessness about scarring lesions, and feelings of isolation due to lack of support; (2) social functioning, including restricted choice of employment, avoidance of socializing with others, and reduced participation in social activities; and (3) information seeking, acceptance, and living with the scar, including bargaining, seeking professional help, and use of social media.

CONCLUSIONS

After open surgery for thyroid cancer, patients experience a variety of scarring features that affect their quality of life. Therefore, preoperative communication and long-term postoperative care should be emphasized in clinical practice and research.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Understanding the experience of carrying scars after thyroid cancer surgery helps provide adequate information, expectation management, and informed decision-making.

Influence of Closed-incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Abdominal Site Complications in Autologous Breast Reconstruction

Background

Closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) has shown promise in reducing surgical wound complications. Among its numerous benefits, it allows for exudate management and tension offloading from wound edges. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of prophylactic ciNPWT versus conventional dressings on abdominal donor site complications in microsurgical breast reconstruction (MR).

Methods

A systematic review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines in January 2023. PubMed and Embase were searched to identify all relevant studies. Data collected included rates of total wound complications, wound dehiscence, infection, seroma, and length of hospital stay.

Results

A total of 202 articles were screened, and eight studies (1009 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Use of ciNPWT was associated with a significantly lower rate of wound dehiscence (OR, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.85; P = 0.0085, I2 = 0%). There was no significant difference in the rate of total wound complications [odds ratio (OR), 0.63; 95% CI, 0.35-1.14; P = 0.12, I2 = 69%], donor site infection (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.42-1.50; P = 0.47, I2 = 13%), seroma (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.22-2.49; P = 0.63, I2 = 57%), or length of hospital stay (SMD, 0.089; 95% CI, -0.13-0.35; P = 0.37, I2 = 29%).

Conclusions

Although exudate management by ciNPWT fails to reduce surgical site infection, seroma formation, and overall length of stay, ciNPWT tension offloading properties seem to be associated with lower rates of wound dehiscence when compared with conventional dressings in abdominal-based autologous breast reconstruction.

Elevated Levels of Serum Biomarkers Associated with Damage to the CNS Neurons and Endothelial Cells Are Linked with Changes in Brain Connectivity in Breast Cancer Patients with Vestibulo-Atactic Syndrome

Vestibulo-atactic syndrome (VAS), which represents a combination of motor and vestibular disorders, can be manifested as a clinical complication of breast cancer treatment and has a significant impact on patients' quality of life. The identification of novel potential biomarkers that might help to predict the onset of VAS and its progression could improve the management of this group of patients. In the current study, the levels of intercellular cell adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 (PECAM-1), NSE (neuron-specific enolase), and the antibodies recognizing NR-2 subunit of NMDA receptor (NR-2-ab) were measured in the blood serum of BC survivor patients with vestibulo-atactic syndrome (VAS) and associated with the brain connectome data obtained via functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies. A total of 21 patients were registered in this open, single-center trial and compared to age-matched healthy female volunteers (control group) (n = 17). BC patients with VAS demonstrated higher serum levels of ICAM-1, PECAM-1, and NSE and a lower value of NR-2-ab, with values of 654.7 ± 184.8, 115.3 ± 37.03, 49.9 ± 103.9, and 0.5 ± 0.3 pg/mL, respectively, as compared to the healthy volunteers, with 230.2 ± 44.8, 62.8 ± 15.6, 15.5 ± 6.4, and 1.4 ± 0.7 pg/mL. According to the fMRI data (employing seed-to-voxel and ROI-to-ROI methods), in BC patients with VAS, significant changes were detected in the functional connectivity in the areas involved in the regulation of postural-tonic reflexes, the coordination of movements, and the regulation of balance. In conclusion, the detected elevated levels of serum biomarkers may reveal damage to the CNS neurons and endothelial cells that is, in turn, associated with the change in the brain connectivity in this group of patients.

Psychosexual responses to BRCA gene mutations in women of childbearing age

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of a BRCA gene mutation presents a dilemma because life-changing medical decisions must be made to prevent breast and ovarian cancer. There is minimal evidence regarding how psychosexual functioning, psychological well-being with regard to body image and sexuality, affects the decision to have prophylactic treatment in women of childbearing age (WCBA; 18-49 years) with a BRCA gene mutation.

PURPOSE

To explore, describe, and interpret the experience of women with a BRCA mutation during the treatment and decision-making process.

METHODOLOGY

A qualitative descriptive design was used to recruit participants online through social media postings and from national and local BRCA support groups. Participants participated in semistructured interviews exploring their experience after BRCA diagnosis. Interpretive descriptive analysis was used to identify themes.

RESULTS

The purposive sample comprised 18 women aged 21-49 years. Four major themes, such as body image, sexuality, femininity, and childbearing/childrearing, were identified that influenced decisions related to the diagnosis and management of a BRCA mutation. All participants voiced that concerns regarding body image and sexuality caused hesitancy in their decision to have prophylactic surgery. Women who had undergone bilateral prophylactic mastectomy were concerned about the impact of the surgery, scarring, breast disfigurement, and the lack of sensation resulting from surgical intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Psychosexual concerns arise from internal and external influences that significantly affect the decision to undergo prophylactic measures. Therefore, body image, sexuality, and sexual orientation should all be addressed during the decision-making process.

IMPLICATIONS

Provider communication and preparation for realistic surgical outcomes can be improved to assist WCBA throughout the decision-making process and enhance psychosexual functioning.

Analysis of images supplied by Skincam® can record the changes of some scar features that occur over time. Comparisons with the assessments of dermatologist and patients' perception

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to assess in vivo the validity of a new imaging device in quantifying the scarring process over time and to compare its data with the expertise of dermatologist and patients' self-appraisals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 37 Korean women, aged 20-50 year, with closed scars of different types, were enrolled after a dermatological evaluation. All subjects applied daily a hydrating cream on their scars for 2 months. Images of scars at different times (Day 0, Day 28, and Day 56) were taken and further analyzed, yielding various parameters such as color, luminance, size, volume, and depth of each scar. A dermatologist visually graded, at each time point, the clinical aspect of the scar, and patients were asked to answer to some questions dealing with their self-examination of their scar.

RESULTS

The changes in some scar features that occurred during the application period were quantified and statistically differed from the D₀ baseline value. Scars became of reduced size, lighter (Increased luminance), less red, less deep, and less voluminous. Some of these parameters (volume, lightness, smoothness, texture regularity) were statistically different at D₂₈ whereas some others (area, depth, redness) showed significant changes at D₅₆ . Dermatologist expertise and patients' assessments were in high agreement.

CONCLUSION

This methodological approach that uses a dedicated camera associated with image analysis, despite some inherent limits (size of the scar), appears as a valuable aid to surgeons in the management of scars, in the follow-up of a given procedure or treatment. Beyond scar management, this approach may be extended to other skin disorders such as acne.

Concepts in soft-tissue reconstruction of the contracted hand and upper extremity after burn injury

Burns and their subsequent contracture result in devastating functional and aesthetic consequences which disproportionally affect the upper extremity. By focusing on reconstruction with analogous tissue and utilizing the reconstructive elevator, function can be restored concomitantly with form and aesthetic appearance. General concepts for soft-tissue reconstruction after burn contracture are presented for different sub-units and joints.

Donor-Site Satisfaction of DIEP and Latissimus Dorsi Flaps-A Comparative Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

 Understanding of donor-site morbidity and satisfaction after breast reconstruction is limited. There are few previous studies comparing satisfaction with different donor sites in breast reconstruction. This study aimed to examine the long-term patient-reported satisfaction with the donor site of latissimus dorsi (LD) flaps in comparison to the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flaps. Further, a systematic review of previously published studies was conducted.

METHODS

 In this retrospective cross-sectional study, all women who underwent breast reconstructions with either LD or DIEP flap following mastectomy and radiotherapy between 2007 and 2017 were included; patient-reported satisfaction was assessed using the BREAST-Q reconstruction module. For the systematic review, studies examining patient-reported abdominal satisfaction and well-being, and meeting the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome) criteria were included.

RESULTS

 Eligible and responding participants were divided into the LD (n = 135 patients) and DIEP (n = 118 patients) flap groups. Impairment due to muscular weakness of the donor site was more common in the LD group than that of the DIEP group. Bulging was common in the DIEP group and increased over time. Regarding the esthetic appearance of the donor site, the patients in the DIEP group were less satisfied than the LD group. The systematic review showed that most of the patients were dissatisfied with their abdomen after the operation.

CONCLUSION

 Patients who have undergone DIEP flap for breast reconstruction are less satisfied with the donor-site esthetics than those who have undergone LD flap. Patient-reported abdominal bulging was common in the DIEP group and the number seemed to increase over time. Most patients were not satisfied with their abdominal scarring postoperatively, as per the systematic review. These results may indicate a need for more nuanced preoperative patient information, as well as improvements in the surgical management of the donor site, for DIEP flap reconstructions.

"Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy (ciNPT) reduces abdominal donor site surgical wound dehiscence in Deep Internal Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstructions: DEhiscence PREvention Study II (DEPRES II) - a Randomized Clinical Trial"

BACKGROUND

In breast reconstruction surgeries, surgical wound dehiscence is a serious complication which generates a significant burden on patients and healthcare systems. There are indications that postoperative treatment with closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) has been associated with reduced wound dehiscence rates. This randomized clinical trial examines the effect of ciNPT application on abdominal donor site surgical wound dehiscence in low- and high-risk patients undergoing a breast reconstruction with a deep internal epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap.

METHODS

Eighty eligible women, stratified as low- or high-risk patients, were included and were randomized for treatment with either ciNPT or adhesive strips (AS) by drawing sealed, opaque envelopes. All surgeons were kept blind for allocation. Primary outcomes were surgical wound dehiscence and surgical site infection at the abdominal donor site upon follow-up after 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes were seroma and hematoma formation. Five patients were excluded from the study due to non-sufficient exposure to the study treatment (n=4) or major protocol deviation (n=1).

RESULTS

A total of 75 women, low-risk (n=38) and high-risk (n=37), received either ciNPT (n=36) or AS (n=39). Patients' demographics did not differ significantly. Donor-site surgical wound dehiscence occurred in 23 patients; the Absolute Risk Reduction was statistically significant (21.6%, 95% Confidence Interval [1.5-41.7]). No statistically significant differences were found in surgical site infection or secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In this randomized clinical trial, postoperative treatment with ciNPT decreased the incidence of surgical wound dehiscence at the abdominal donor site in low- and high-risk DIEP flap breast reconstruction patients.

Choosing Mastectomy vs. Lumpectomy-With-Radiation: Experiences of Breast Cancer Survivors

Background

Annually about 280,000 women are diagnosed with breast cancer. Treatment options depend on age, comorbidities, tumor stage, grade, size, and other factors. Often, patients must decide between two surgical treatment options: mastectomy or lumpectomy-with-radiation herein simply called a lumpectomy. Since both offer similar survival outcomes, the choice ultimately is the patient’s. However, most rely on inputs from doctors, family, friends, personal research, and other actions. We believe decision-making processes for future patients will be aided if experiences of prior breast cancer survivors are known. This study’s aim is to provide such information.

Methods

Feedback from prior breast cancer survivors was obtained using a 19-question survey distributed online to multiple breast cancer support groups. It focused on issues relevant to choosing between the two surgical options including, post-surgical complications, breast reconstruction, chronic pain, cosmetics, and surgery-choice satisfaction.

Results

Respondents (N=1606) had a median age of 49 years (range 26 to 88 years) and had a median body mass index (BMI) of 26.6 Kg/m². There were 978 mastectomy patients (60.9%) and 628 lumpectomy patients (39.1%). With regard to post-surgical reconstruction, 64.2% of mastectomy respondents and 13.5% of lumpectomy respondents decided to undergo breast cancer reconstruction following breast cancer surgery. Almost all (99.8%) of lumpectomy respondents had radiation side-effects; with skin irritation and thickening and chest wall tenderness being the most common. Among mastectomy patients, 94.3% had one or more complications; loss-or-changes in nipple or breast sensation, uneven breasts, chest wall tenderness, and breast swelling were the most common complications. Post-surgical pain lasting six months or more was experienced by a smaller percentage of mastectomy vs. lumpectomy patients (64.1% vs. 78%, p <0.00001). Mastectomy patients were also less likely to have pain that was persistent and present up to the time of the survey (35.4% vs. 46.0%, p=0.0002). With respect to cosmetic outcomes, mastectomy patients vs. lumpectomy patients were less likely to be either satisfied or very satisfied (52.2% vs. 62.7%, p=0.00004). Overall satisfaction of surgical treatment was 70.9% for mastectomy patients and 68.6% for lumpectomy patients.

Conclusion

Based on the experiences of these breast cancer survivors, mastectomy is associated with less chronic pain frequency and lower incidence of post-surgical side effects compared to lumpectomy. However, mastectomy is associated with lower cosmetic satisfaction. Breast cancer survivors that underwent a lumpectomy, reported being more satisfied with cosmetic outcomes but almost all reported radiation side-effects with skin thickening listed as the most common. Lumpectomy was also associated with higher chronic pain frequency compared to mastectomy.

The overall surgical treatment satisfaction reported by mastectomy and lumpectomy respondents was similar. The composite findings will provide information that will aid future breast cancer patients in making a decision between having a mastectomy or a lumpectomy.