Self-reported causes of cancer among 6881 survivors with 6 tumour types: results from the PROFILES registry

Patient-reported outcomes in cancer survivorship: insights from two decades of population-based PROFILES registry research

PURPOSE

When the field of cancer survivorship research was in its infancy, the PROFILES registry was set up in 2004 to monitor patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in survivors and a normative population. This scoping review aims to summarize lessons learned from developing a population-based PRO registry, focusing on study methodologies, data collection shifts, data utilization, multidisciplinary collaboration, societal impact, and data sharing.

METHODS

A systematic computerized literature search through PubMed was performed to collect all publications using data from the PROFILES registry between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2023.

RESULTS

The PROFILES registry's research today encompassed 249 papers from 35 studies. Key insights include the importance of multi-hospital collaboration, which enhances participant inclusion and result generalizability. Optimizing response rates and patient inclusion is achieved through proactive data collection methods such as inclusion by health care professionals, and using both web-based and paper questionnaires. Longitudinal studies, despite their intensive data collection efforts, provide critical insights into the consequences of cancer and its treatment on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from diagnosis through survivorship. Combining PRO data with comprehensive clinical registry data ensures reliable datasets, crucial for drawing meaningful conclusions. The shift towards multidisciplinary collaboration, open-access publishing, and data sharing all contribute to accessible and impactful research.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights key insights from the PROFILES registry, emphasizing multi-hospital collaboration, proactive data collection, and the integration of PROs with clinical data.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

These lessons can guide future research on cancer survivorship, improving methodologies to enhance survivorship care and quality of life through multidisciplinary collaboration and data sharing.

Mechanism of chronic stress to promote tumor development and the intervention

Chronic stress is a serial of non-specific neuroendocrine reactions in the body when stimulated by stressors for a long time, which has been shown to have a significant effect on tumor development. Chronic stress can activate the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis and the sense-adrenal myelin system, promote catecholamine and adrenal corticosteroid secretion, regulate the downstream pathways at all levels, and modulate the secretion of immune cells and immune factors, inhibit protective immune response, and induce inflammation, thus promoting tumor cell proliferation and metastasis. Some drugs and psychotherapy can alleviate the patient's stress state, block the nerve signal transmission at all levels of access, regulate the immune system, or can become an effective means to intervene in chronic stress in tumor patients for clinical treatment to provide reference for intervention ideas. However, due to lack of relevant clinical trials, the clinical intervention effect of various drugs and psychotherapy is uncertain and needs more studies to verify the effect.

Illness perceptions and health-related quality of life in individuals with overweight and obesity

INTRODUCTION

To understand how individuals (self-)manage obesity, insight is needed into how patients perceive their condition and how this perception translates into health outcomes (e.g., health-related quality of life, HRQOL). Our objectives were (1) to examine illness perceptions in individuals with overweight and obesity, and (2) to investigate associations of these perceptions with physical and mental HRQOL.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional analysis of the Netherlands Epidemiology of Obesity Study (n = 6432; 52% women), illness perceptions were assessed using the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire, and HRQOL was assessed using the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey. Illness perceptions were calculated for different categories of overall, abdominal, and metabolically unhealthy obesity. We investigated associations of illness perceptions with HRQOL using BMI-stratified multivariable linear regression analyses.

RESULTS

Compared to individuals with normal weight, individuals with obesity believed to a higher extent that their condition had more serious consequences [Mean Difference (95%CI): 1.8 (1.6-2.0)], persisted for a longer time [3.4 (3.2-3.6)], manifested in more symptoms [3.8 (3.6-4.0)], caused more worry [4.2 (3.9-4.4)] and emotional distress [2.0 (1.8-2.2)], but was more manageable with medical treatment [3.1 (2.9-3.4)]. They perceived to a lesser extent that they had personal control [-2.2 (-2.4, -2.0)] and understanding [-0.3 (-0.5, -0.1)] regarding their condition. These negative perceptions were less pronounced in individuals with abdominal obesity. Behaviour/Lifestyle was attributed by 73% of participants to be the cause of their obesity. Stronger negative illness perceptions were associated with impaired HRQOL, particularly the physical component.

CONCLUSION

Individuals with obesity perceived their conditions as threatening, and this seemed somewhat stronger in individuals with overall obesity than those with abdominal obesity. Behaviour/Lifestyle is a crucial target intervention and empowering self-management behaviour to achieve a healthy body weight may deliver promising results. In addition, strategies that aim to change negative perceptions of obesity into more adaptive ones may improve HRQOL.