A single institution experience of streptozocin/fluorouracil combination chemotherapy: a case series

Clinical efficacy of first and second series of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasm: a cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an established treatment for metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN). However, only limited data exists for the effect of multiple series of PRRT. The aim of this study was to investigate PFS and OS inNEN patients treated with multiple series of PRRT conforming to the ENETS treatment protocol.

METHODS

We included all patients with gastrointestinal (GI), pancreatic and bronchopulmonary (BP) NEN treated with PRRT from 2008 to 2018. We used Kaplan-Meier estimation to evaluate PFS and OS with subgroup analysis of primary tumor, Ki67-index, type of radioisotope and number of PRRT series.

RESULTS

133 patients (female/male 61/72) were included, median age 70 (interquartile range 64-76) years. GI-NEN comprised 62%, pancreatic 23% and BP 11%. Median Ki67-index was 5%. After first PRRTG1- and G2-tumors had PFS of 25 and 22 months, compared to 11 months in G3-NENs (p < .05) and PFS was longer in G1/G2 GI-NENs than BP-NEN (30vs. 12 months, p < .05). After retreatment with a second series of PRRT, the overall PFS (G1-G3) was 19 months, with G1- and G2-tumors having the highest PFS of 19 and 22 months, respectively. Overall, the GI and BP tumors had an OS of 54 and 51 months.

CONCLUSIONS

PRRT is an effective therapy with long-term PFS and OS, especially in G1 and G2 NENs, and with better prognosis in GI-NEN compared with BP-NENs. OS and PFS was shorter after the second series of PRRT compared with the first, however results were still encouraging.

Chemotherapy for advanced non-pancreatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours of the gastrointestinal tract, a systematic review and meta-analysis: A lost cause?

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy is well-established in the treatment of patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) arising from the pancreas (pNETs); however, its role in patients with gastrointestinal non-pancreatic NETs (non-pNETs) is uncertain. This systematic review assesses the evidence for the role of chemotherapy in well-differentiated non-pNET patients.

METHODS

Eligible studies (identified using MEDLINE) were those reporting response and/or survival data for patients with well-differentiated non-pNETs receiving systemic chemotherapy. The primary end-point was overall-response (OR) rate; secondary end-points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease-stabilization (DS) and disease-control (DC) rates.

RESULTS

Of 6434 studies screened, 20 were eligible: one randomised phase III trial, 2 randomised phase II studies, 10 single-arm phase II trials and 7 retrospective analyses including a total of 264 patients (median of 11 patients per study, range 6-49); and employing multiple chemotherapy schedules. The mean "median PFS" and "median OS" were 16.9 months (95%-confidence interval (CI) 3.8-30.04) and 32.2 months (95%-CI 10.4-54.2), respectively. The non-weighted mean OR, DS and DC rates were 11.5% (95%-CI 5.8-17.2), 56.5% (95%-CI 38.1-74.9) and 70.7% (95%-CI 54.9-86.5), respectively. In studies including both pNETs and non-pNET patients, meta-analysis showed a lower OR-rate in the non-pNET patients when compared to pNETs [odds ratio (OR) 0.35 (95% CI 0.18-0.66)]; however significance was lost when high-risk bias studies were excluded in a sensitivity analysis [OR 0.45 (95% CI 0.19-1.07); p-value 0.07].

CONCLUSION

Studies were of evidence level-C with heterogeneous populations and treatments; and small patient numbers. Well-designed, prospective studies are needed to adequately evaluate the role of chemotherapy in this setting.

Streptozocin/5-fluorouracil chemotherapy is associated with durable response in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

BACKGROUND

The role of systemic chemotherapy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNET) is controversially discussed. Objective response rates (RR) reported for streptozocin (STZ)-based chemotherapy are variable and novel targeted drugs have recently been approved. However, the sequence of treatment remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of STZ plus 5-fluorouracil (STZ/5-FU) in a large pNET cohort.

METHODS

Data from 96 pNET patients treated with STZ/5-FU were analysed retrospectively. Endpoints of the study were RR, time to tumour progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Mean age of patients at the start of chemotherapy was 57.6years (range, 32.1-80.4). STZ/5-FU was the 1st line treatment in 56.3%. 11.5% had G1, 79.2% G2 and 6.3% G3 neoplasms. Baseline progression was evident in 74%. Objective response rate was 42.7%. 40.6% of patients showed stable disease as best response while 16.7% showed progressive disease. Treatment was discontinued due to toxicity in 16 patients. Median TTP and OS were 19.4 (95% confidence interval (CI), 13.6-25.2) and 54.8months (95% CI, 34.7-74.9), respectively. In Cox regression analysis, Ki67>15% was the only negative prognostic factor for TTP (hazard ratio (HR), 3.3; P<0.001), confirmed by multivariate analysis (HR, 6.7; P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

STZ/5-FU was associated with considerable RR. Treatment was associated with durable TTP especially in patients with Ki67-index of ⩽15%. These findings along with good tolerability strengthen the value of this two-drug chemotherapy for the management of unresectable pNET.

Nonhuman primate models of type 1 diabetes mellitus for islet transplantation

Islet transplantation is an attractive treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Animal models of diabetes mellitus (DM) contribute a lot to the experimental studies of islet transplantation and to evaluations of isolated islet grafts for future clinical applications. Diabetic nonhuman primates (NHPs) represent the suitable models of DMs to better evaluate the effectiveness of islet transplantation, to assess new strategies for controlling blood glucose (BG), relieving immune rejection, or prolonging islet survival, and eventually to translate the preclinical data into tangible clinical practice. This review introduces some NHP models of DM, clarifies why and how the models should be used, and elucidates the usefulness and limitations of the models in islet transplantation.