Sigmoid volvulus: definitive surgery is safe and should be considered in all instances

Sigmoid volvulus-Can CT features predict outcomes and recurrence?

OBJECTIVES

Sigmoid volvulus (SV) is a common cause of bowel obstruction, especially in older patients. SV can be mesenteroaxial (M-SV) or organoaxial (O-SV). The purpose of this study was to assess if CT findings in SV are associated with clinical outcomes. including recurrence, choice of management, and mortality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study includes patients with SV and a CT within 24 hours of presentation. CT features, including mesenteraoxial/organoaxial arrangement, direction of rotation, transition points, distension, whirl-sign, ischemia, and perforation were determined. Demographics, treatment, recurrence, and outcome data were recorded.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventeen cases were diagnosed in 80 patients (54 male). The mean age was 70 years (± 17.1). M-SV and O-SV were equally prevalent (n = 39 vs. n = 41, respectively). M-SV was significantly more common with anticlockwise rotation in the axial plane (p = 0.028) and clockwise rotation in the coronal plane (p = 0.015). All patients with imaging features of ischemia underwent surgery (n = 6). There was no significant difference in outcome variables (30-day mortality, 30-day readmission, recurrence) between the O-SV and M-SV groups. The degree of bowel distension on initial presentation was a significant predictor of recurrence, with ≥ 9 cm vs < 9 cm associated with an increased odds of any recurrence (OR: 3.23; 95%CI: 1.39-7.92).

CONCLUSION

In SV, sigmoid distension of more than 9 cm at baseline CT was associated with an increased risk of recurrence. Imaging features of ischemia predicted surgical over endoscopic intervention. Organoaxial and mesenteroaxial SV had similar prevalence, but the type of volvulus was not associated with clinical outcomes or choice of management.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

There is a risk of recurrent sigmoid volvulus with colonic distension greater than 9 cm. This work, comparing volvulus subtypes, shows that this finding at the initial presentation could expedite consideration for surgical management.

KEY POINTS

Reports of outcomes for different subtypes and rotational directions of volvuli have been contradictory. No difference in measured outcomes was found between subtypes; distension ≥ 9 cm predicted recurrence. CT features can aide management of sigmoid volvulus and can prompt surgical intervention.

Extremely dilated intestine

An old woman with severe constipation was dignosed with sigmoid torsion and time-limited surgery was performed to save her life.

Comparison of the ability of resection versus nonresection surgery to prevent the recurrence of sigmoid volvulus: A protocol of a meta-analysis and systematic review

PURPOSE

Based on clinical research guidelines and clinical practice, patients with sigmoid volvulus (SV) who receive conservative treatment have a greater recurrence rate than patients who do not receive conservative treatment, which is almost without any controversy. Surgical treatment is usually the final treatment for patients with SV. However, there are multiple surgical methods for the treatment of SV, which can be roughly divided into resection and nonresection methods. The available evidence on the effectiveness of surgery for preventing postoperative recurrence is still inadequate. Therefore, we drafted this systematic review protocol with meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of these two major types of surgery on preventing the recurrence of SV.

METHODS

We comprehensively and systematically reviewed the PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases of articles on SV from inception to November 16, 2023. Two independent authors will screen and analyze the detected literature, and disputes will be resolved through communication with a third experienced person. After evaluating the quality of the literature and estimating the risk of bias, we calculate the pooled effect size and 95% confidence interval. Heterogeneity is analyzed by subgroup analysis, and sensitivity analysis can be carried out to assure the reliability of the results. Finally, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) will be used to evaluate the strength of the evidence. The results of each analysis will be recorded in detail. The whole process was carried out in strict accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols guidelines (PRISMA-P).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Protocol registration: The study protocol has been registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews platform (PROSPERO) (CRD42024508350). Protocol version 1.0, 13 Feb 2024.

Laparoscopic Sigmoid Colectomy with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction in Sigmoid Volvulus

Sigmoid volvulus (SV), the twisting of the sigmoid colon around its own base, is a relatively rare colonic obstruction form. Endoscopic detorsion is the first-line management option in uncomplicated patients. However, recurrence risk is as high as 90%, with a risk of mortality up to 35%. Although procedures such as sigmoidopexy, sigmoidomesopexy, sigmoidomesoplasty, extraperitonealization, or percutaneous endoscopic sigmoidopexy may prevent or reduce SV recurrence, laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy with natural orifice specimen extraction appears to be the optimal choice in selected cases. Cite this article as: Atamanalp SS. Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy with natural orifice specimen extraction in sigmoid volvulus. Eurasian J Med. Published online May 2, 2024. doi:10.5152/ eurasianjmed.2024.24420.

To Resect or Not to Resect: A Nationwide Comparison of Management of Sigmoid Volvulus

INTRODUCTION

Despite the high recurrence rate of sigmoid volvulus, there is reluctance to perform a prophylactic colectomy in frail patients due to the operation's perceived risks. We used a nationally representative database to compare risk of recurrence in patients undergoing a prophylactic colectomy versus endoscopic detorsion alone.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study using the National Readmission Database (2016-2019) including patients aged ≥18 y who had an emergent admission for sigmoid volvulus and underwent endoscopic detorsion on the day of admission. We performed a 1:1 propensity matching adjusting for patient demographics, frailty score comprising of 109 components, and hospital characteristics. Our primary outcome was readmission due to colonic volvulus and secondary outcomes included mortality, complications, length of stay (LOS), and costs during index admission and readmission. We performed a subgroup analysis in patients with Hospital Frailty Score >5.

RESULTS

We included 2113 patients of which 1046 patients (49.5%) underwent a colectomy during the initial admission. In the matched population of 830 pairs, readmission due to colonic volvulus was significantly lower in patients undergoing endoscopy followed by colectomy than endoscopy alone. Patients undergoing a colectomy had higher gastric and renal complications, longer LOS, and higher costs but no difference in mortality. In the subgroup analysis of frail patients, readmission was significantly lower in patients with prophylactic colectomy with no significant difference in mortality in 439 matched patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic colectomy was associated with lower readmission, a higher rate of complications, increased LOS, and higher costs compared to sigmoid decompression alone.

Navigating Abdominal Volvulus: A Comprehensive Review of Management Strategies

Abdominal volvulus represents a critical condition characterized by the abnormal twisting of the GI tract, potentially leading to obstruction and vascular compromise. Prompt recognition and appropriate management are essential to prevent complications and improve patient outcomes. This comprehensive review examines the anatomy, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and diagnostic evaluation of, and management strategies for abdominal volvulus. Non-operative techniques, including detorsion and decompression, as well as surgical interventions, such as laparoscopic and open approaches, are discussed. Additionally, the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration and postoperative care is emphasized. Despite significant advancements, unresolved issues remain, necessitating further research to refine diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Future directions, including exploring emerging technologies, offer promise for enhancing the management of this challenging condition. Overall, this review provides clinicians with valuable insights into the optimal management of abdominal volvulus, aiming to improve patient outcomes and enhance clinical practice.

Volvulus of the gastrointestinal tract

Volvulus describes the twisting of the intestine or colon around its mesentery. Intestinal obstruction and/or ischaemia are the most common complications of volvulus. Within the gastrointestinal tract, there is a preponderance towards colonic volvulus. The sigmoid is the most commonly affected segment, followed by the caecum, small intestine and stomach. Distinguishing between the differing anatomical locations of gastrointestinal volvulus can be challenging, but is important for the management and prognosis. This article focuses on the main anatomical sites of gastrointestinal volvulus encountered in clinical practice. The aetiology, presentation, radiological features and management options for each are discussed to highlight the key differences.

Outcomes for sigmoid volvulus managed with and without early definitive surgery: 20-year experience in a tertiary referral centre

BACKGROUND

Sigmoid volvulus is rare in Western countries. Patients at risk of sigmoid volvulus are often older with significant co-morbidity. Without sigmoid colectomy there is a high recurrence rate, but indications for surgery are controversial.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted by reviewing clinical records of patients admitted to Waikato Hospital 1 January 2000 to 1 January 2020 with a diagnosis of sigmoid volvulus. Patient characteristics, clinical features, investigations, management, and outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-two patients (87 male) were included with 203 volvulus episodes. Median age 76 years, median Charlson co-morbidity index (CCI) 4. Median follow-up 11 years. 44/132 (33.3%) had surgery during the index admission, two had elective surgery and the remainder had planned non-operative management. 73/132 (55.3%) had surgery at any stage. 42/86 (48.8%) patients managed non-operatively recurred; 66.7% of recurrences were within 6 months. Forty-three (32.6%) died within 12 months of index admission; 28 (21.2%) died during an admission for volvulus. On univariate analysis higher age and abnormal vital signs were associated with inpatient and 12-month mortality; higher CCI was associated with 12-month mortality. On multi-variate analysis increasing age in years was associated with increased risk of death (HR 1.089 [1.052-1.128, P < 0.001]). Normal vital signs at presentation were associated with decreased risk of death (HR 0.147 [0.065-0.334, P < 0.001]).

CONCLUSION

Sigmoid colectomy should be considered at index presentation with sigmoid volvulus. Half of patients managed non-operatively recurred, with two-thirds recurring within 6 months. The mortality rate remains high for subsequent volvulus episodes.