Immunotherapy Advances in Urothelial Carcinoma

Prognostic significance of circulating tumor DNA in urothelial carcinoma patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a novel biomarker with the advantages of being non-invasive and enabling dynamic monitoring, providing significant clinical insights into the prognosis and management of malignancies. However, its prognostic role in patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC) receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) remains controversial. This study aims to systematically review and perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic significance of ctDNA levels in this specific patient population.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and EMBASE databases to include studies published up to November 14, 2024, assessing the prognostic value of ctDNA in UC patients treated with ICI. Fixed-effects or random-effects models were used to evaluate the association between ctDNA levels and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS)/disease-free survival (DFS). Funnel plots, Begg's test, and Egger's test were employed to assess publication bias.

Results

Nine studies from eight articles, comprising a total of 862 urothelial carcinoma (UC) patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), were included in this meta-analysis. Seven studies investigated the association between baseline circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) status and clinical outcomes. Compared to patients without detectable ctDNA, those with elevated baseline ctDNA levels exhibited significantly shorter progression-free survival/disease-free survival (PFS/DFS) (HR = 2.75, 95% CI = 1.36-5.58, P = 0.005), though no statistically significant difference was observed in overall survival (OS) (HR = 2.08, 95% CI = 0.83-5.24, P = 0.119). Additionally, we evaluated the prognostic value of ctDNA dynamics during ICI therapy. A decline or clearance of ctDNA levels was significantly associated with improved clinical outcomes (OS: HR = 0.10, 95% CI = 0.02-0.47, P = 0.004; PFS/DFS: HR = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.16-0.45, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

This meta-analysis demonstrates that detectable ctDNA is significantly associated with PFS or DFS in patients with UC undergoing ICI therapy. Moreover, dynamic changes in ctDNA are strongly correlated with OS and PFS/DFS. Therefore, ctDNA serves as a valuable tool for pre-treatment diagnostic assessment and patient stratification and plays a crucial role in monitoring treatment response and tracking disease progression throughout therapy.

Systematic review registration

www.inplasy.com, identifier INPLASY202520058.

Multiple omics integrative analysis identifies GARS1 as a novel prognostic and immunological biomarker: from pan-cancer to bladder cancer

Glycyl-tRNA synthetase (GARS1) is differentially expressed across cancers. In this study, the value of GARS1 in the diagnosis and prognosis of various cancers was comprehensively evaluated by multiple omics integrative pan-cancer analysis and experimental verification. Through Kaplan-Meier, ROC and multiple databases, we explored GARS1 expression and prognostic and diagnostic patterns across cancers. The GARS1 relative reaction network was identified in PPI, GO, KEGG, methylation models and the genetic mutation atlas. Further research on the GARS1 value in bladder urothelial carcinoma (BLCA) was conducted by regression and nomogram models. We further analyzed the correlation between GARS1 and immune markers and cells in BLCA. Finally, in vitro experiments were used to validate GARS1 the oncogenic function of GARS1 in BLCA. We found that GARS1 was highly expressed across cancers, especially in BLCA. GARS1 expression was correlated with poor survival and had high diagnostic value in most tumor types. GARS1 is significantly associated with tRNA-related pathways whose mutation sites are mainly located on tRNA synthetase. In addition, Upregulation of GARS1 was connected with immune cell infiltration and five key MMR genes. M2 macrophages, TAMs, Th1 and T-cell exhaustion, and marker sets associated with GARS1 expression indicated specific immune infiltration in BLCA. Finally, in vitro experiments validated that GARS1 expression promotes BLCA cell proliferation and metastasis and inhibits apoptosis. Overall, GARS1 can be a novel prognostic and immunological biomarker through multiple omics integrative pan-cancer analysis. The expression of GARS1 in BLCA was positively correlated with specific immune infiltration, indicating that GARS1 might be related to the tumor immune microenvironment.

Prevention and Treatment of Side Effects of Immunotherapy for Bladder Cancer

Bladder cancer (BC) is one of the most important tumors of the genitourinary system, associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Over the years, various antitumor treatments have been developed, and immunotherapy is one of the most effective methods. Immunotherapy aims to activate the body’s immune system to kill cancer cells. It has been established that immunotherapy drugs can be classified into “non-targeted” and “targeted” drugs depending on their site of action. Immunotherapy is reportedly effective for BC. Even though it can attack cancer cells, it can also cause the immune system to attack healthy cells, which can occur at any time during treatment and sometimes even after immunotherapy is stopped. Importantly, different types of immunotherapies can cause different side effects. Side effects may manifest themselves as signs or as symptoms. The prevention and treatment of side effects caused by immunotherapy is an important part of cancer patient management.

Improved Immunotherapy Efficacy by Vascular Modulation

Several strategies have been developed to modulate the tumour vasculature for cancer therapy including anti-angiogenesis and vascular normalisation. Vasculature modulation results in changes to the tumour microenvironment including oxygenation and immune cell infiltration, therefore lending itself to combination with cancer therapy. The development of immunotherapies has led to significant improvements in cancer treatment. Particularly promising are immune checkpoint blockade and CAR T cell therapies, which use antibodies against negative regulators of T cell activation and T cells reprogrammed to better target tumour antigens, respectively. However, while immunotherapy is successful in some patients, including those with advanced or metastatic cancers, only a subset of patients respond. Therefore, better predictors of patient response and methods to overcome resistance warrant investigation. Poor, or periphery-limited, T cell infiltration in the tumour is associated with poor responses to immunotherapy. Given that (1) lymphocyte recruitment requires leucocyte-endothelial cell adhesion and (2) the vasculature controls tumour oxygenation and plays a pivotal role in T cell infiltration and activation, vessel targeting strategies including anti-angiogenesis and vascular normalisation in combination with immunotherapy are providing possible new strategies to enhance therapy. Here, we review the progress of vessel modulation in enhancing immunotherapy efficacy.

Expression of Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 as a Predictive Biomarker in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Patients Treated with First-line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Versus Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have reported durable responses in selected groups of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). However, identification of biomarkers predictive of response to ICIs remains an unmet need in mUC management, and the role of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed at assessing the predictive value of PD-L1 in mUC patients receiving first-line ICIs as monotherapy or in combination with other anticancer agents across randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs).

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We retrieved all the relevant RCTs through PubMed/Medline, Cochrane library, and EMBASE; proceedings of the main international oncological meetings were also searched for relevant abstracts. Eligible studies included RCTs evaluating ICIs versus chemotherapy in PD-L1-positive mUCs; the primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Three phase III trials matched our eligibility criteria; a total of 2237 PD-L1-positive mUC patients (ICIs: 1125; chemotherapy: 1112) were included in the analysis. Compared with chemotherapy, ICIs were associated with higher OS in PD-L1-positive patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-0.96; p = 0.007); conversely, no differences were observed in the PD-L1-negative patient population (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.89-1.19; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with standard chemotherapy, our results suggested a survival benefit in PD-L1-positive mUC patients receiving ICIs; conversely, no benefit was observed in patients with PD-L1-negative disease. Although this systematic review and meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution due to several issues, our results highlight the need for reliable predictive biomarkers of response to ICIs, providing a benchmark for future studies in this setting.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Despite immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) having revolutionized the treatment landscape of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), an important percentage of patients do not experience clinical benefit or durable responses. Identification of reliable biomarkers of response to ICIs remains a mandatory need in mUC management, and further efforts are needed to standardize the assessment of programmed cell death ligand 1 in urothelial carcinoma.

Emerging Treatment Options for the Treatment of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer: Therapeutic Potential of Enfortumab Vedotin

Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody–drug conjugate with humanized anti-Nectin-4 antibody linked with a microtubule-disrupting agent called monomethyl auristatin E. Nectin-4 is a cellular adhesion protein that is overexpressed in urothelial cancer. EV was approved in December 2019 for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer who previously received platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Here, we reviewed the clinical efficacy and safety data that led to the accelerated approval of EV for treating patients with metastatic urothelial cancer. Emerging clinical data on EV-based combinational therapeutic trials for metastatic urothelial cancer were also reviewed.