Exercise-Induced Anaphylaxis: Literature Review and Recent Updates

Getting in Shape: Updates in Exercise Anaphylaxis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Exercise induced anaphylaxis (EIA) can be difficult to diagnose due to the interplay of co-factors on clinical presentation and the lack of standardized, confirmatory testing.

RECENT FINDINGS

EIA has been historically categorized as either food-independent or food-dependent. However, recent literature has suggested that perhaps EIA is more complex given the relationship between not only food on EIA but other various co-factors such as medications and alcohol ingestion that are either required to elicit symptoms in EIA or make symptoms worse. For the practicing clinician, understanding how these co-factors can be implicated in EIA can enable one to take a more personalized approach in treating patients with EIA and thus improve quality of life for patients.

The management of exercise-induced anaphylaxis in a Chinese child with biologics: a case report

Exercise-induced anaphylaxis (EIA) is a rare and potentially life-threatening disorder. In difficult to control and refractory cases of EIA, biologics such as omalizumab and dupilumab have shown promise, with documented successful outcomes. Here, we present a case of EIA with lipid transfer protein (LTP) sensitization successfully treated with omalizumab with long-term follow-up. A 12-year-old girl presented to our allergy department because of recurrent episodes of EIA, with no specific food ingestion before exercise. Allergen testing revealed sensitization to weed pollens, particularly mugwort (76.1 kUA/L) and Alternaria alternata (10.8 kUA/L). Allergen component testing indicated sensitization to LTP components from mugwort Art v 3 (49.9 kUA/L), wheat Tri a 14 (2.03 kUA/L), and peach Pru p 3 (11.5 kUA/L), with a negative result for omega-5 gliadin. Despite initial prophylactic treatment with budesonide-formoterol (80/4.5 μg) and cetirizine (10 mg) before exercise, the patient still experienced EIA; she was then recommended for dupilumab therapy (an initial dose of 600 mg, followed by 300 mg every 2 weeks for six doses). However, even while undergoing dupilumab therapy, she suffered two anaphylactic episodes after running 800-1,000 m. With the patient's consent, a trial of omalizumab was initiated (injections of 300 mg every 4 weeks). After 2 months of omalizumab therapy, the patient showed significant improvement. She had been engaging in physical exercise three times a week and experienced a mild episode of urticaria. There were no further episodes of anaphylaxis or emergency room visits. By the fourth month of omalizumab treatment, she was able to consume food normally even just before exercising and had returned to her full activity level without any restrictions. This case presents the first successful off-label use of omalizumab in the prevention of EIA in the Chinese population. It is concluded that omalizumab may be helpful in resolving EIA symptoms, as evidenced by this case of successful long-term use.

Buckwheat Allergy in Asia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Buckwheat (BW) allergy is a significant issue in Asia. This review delves into three types of BW allergy: immediate food allergy; food-dependent, exercise-induced anaphylaxis (FDEIA) as a subset of immediate food allergy; and food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES); by comparing data from Asian and non-Asian countries.

RECENT FINDINGS

Most studies on BW have been published in Japan and Korea, and only a few studies on the topic have been done outside Asia. To date, seven components of common BW (Fagopyrum esculentum) and four components of Tartary BW (Fagopyrum tartaricum) have been implicated in BW allergy. Although BW-sIgE has limited utility for evaluating immediate BW allergy, Fag e 3-specific IgE, one of the components of common BW, and the skin prick test are diagnostically useful. The present review aims to shed light on the current state of knowledge, highlight research gaps, and suggest future directions in the management and understanding of BW allergy.

Pediatric idiopathic anaphylaxis: practical management from infants to adolescents

Idiopathic anaphylaxis (IA) remains a frustrating challenge for both patients and physicians. The aim of this paper is to focus on IA in pediatric ages and suggest possible diagnostic algorithms according to specific age ranges (infants, children, and adolescents). In fact, in a variable percentage of patients, despite extensive diagnostic tests, the cause of anaphylactic episodes cannot be identified. Moreover, the lack of a unanimous IA definition requires a careful and detailed diagnostic workup. Prompt recognition of signs and symptoms, especially in younger children, and an accurate clinical history often allow a choice of the most appropriate diagnostic tests and a correct differential diagnosis.

The Onset of Food-dependent Exercise-induced Anaphylaxis in an Elderly Patient

The development of allergic diseases is common in the young but rare in the elderly. We encountered an elderly patient with food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (FDEIA). An 82-year-old man was rushed to the hospital for symptoms of anaphylaxis. Because the symptoms occurred after ingestion of wheat products and exercise, we made a diagnosis of FDEIA based on a high ω5-gliadin IgE level and a positive exercise test. Based on our review of the existing literature, this was the oldest patient to ever be diagnosed with FDEIA in Japan. This case suggests that physicians should keep in mind that older adults can develop FDEIA.

Severe exercise-induced anaphylaxis in a hot and humid area successfully treated with omalizumab: a case report

Exercise-induced anaphylaxis (EIA) is a rare disorder in which anaphylaxis occurs exclusively after physical activity. Here, we report a case of severe EIA where anaphylaxis was initially only induced by strenuous exercise. Suddenly the anaphylaxis got out of control to the degree that usual daily activities triggered it. Exposure to a hot and humid environment appeared to be a cofactor for the development of severe symptoms resistant to usual preventive measures. Treatment with omalizumab (anti-IgE) was initiated and resulted in marked improvement. We discuss unique aspects of this case in comparison to published information on the clinical features, triggering cofactors, diagnosis, and treatment of EIA.

sCD14 and Intestinal Fatty Acid Binding Protein Are Elevated in the Serum of Patients With Idiopathic Anaphylaxis

BACKGROUND

Intestinal epithelial integrity compromise has been identified in gastrointestinal (GI), atopic, and autoimmune diseases.

OBJECTIVE

Episodes of idiopathic anaphylaxis (IA) are often accompanied by GI manifestations. We, therefore, sought to determine whether surrogate markers of GI permeability were aberrant in this patient population.

METHODS

Serum concentrations of zonulin, intestinal fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP), and soluble CD14 (sCD14) measured in 54 patients with IA were compared with concentrations in healthy controls (HCs); and correlated with clinical and laboratory parameters.

RESULTS

The I-FABP was elevated in sera of patients with IA compared with HCs (median 1,378.0 pg/mL vs 479.0 pg/mL, respectively; P < .001). The sCD14 was also elevated compared with HCs (median 2,017.0 ng/mL and 1,189.0 ng/mL, respectively; P < .001), whereas zonulin was comparable between patients with IA and HCs (median 49.6 ng/mL vs 52.4 ng/mL, respectively; P = .40). The I-FABP was elevated in patients with IA who experienced vomiting and/or diarrhea compared with patients with IA who did not (P = .0091).

CONCLUSIONS

The I-FABP and sCD14 are elevated in the serum of patients with IA. Elevations in these biomarkers of IA provides evidence that increased GI permeability, as is observed in other allergic conditions such as food allergy, is a common finding in those with IA and offers possible insight into the pathogenesis of this disease.

Wilderness Medical Society Clinical Practice Guidelines on Anaphylaxis

The Wilderness Medical Society convened a panel to review the literature and develop evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on the treatment of anaphylaxis, with an emphasis on a field-based perspective. The review also included literature regarding the definition, epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and prevention of anaphylaxis. The increasing prevalence of food allergies in the United States raises concern for a corresponding rise in the incidence of anaphylaxis. Intramuscular epinephrine is the primary treatment for anaphylaxis and should be administered before adjunctive treatments such as antihistamines, corticosteroids, and inhaled β agonists. For outdoor schools and organizations, selecting a method to administer epinephrine in the field is based on considerations of cost, safety, and first responder training, as well as federal guidelines and state-specific laws.

Anaphylaxis and onsite treatment in schools, kindergartens, and nurseries

BACKGROUND

There have been no reports on both anaphylaxis incidence rate in schools, kindergarten, and nurseries, or how teachers have treated these children. This study was a fact-finding survey aimed at determining if appropriate responses to anaphylaxis onset were implemented in Oita Prefecture, Japan.

METHODS

The Oita Prefectural Allergy Control Committee administered a questionnaire using Google forms to all public and private schools, public and private kindergartens, certified child-care facilities, and day-care centers in the prefecture.

RESULTS

Responses to the questionnaire were obtained from 597 institutions, of which 125 890 children were affiliated with the responding institutions. Forty-eight children developed symptoms for which an adrenaline auto-injector was recommended in an Oita guideline. Among these children, three used the adrenaline auto-injector, three were prescribed the adrenaline auto-injector but were unable to use it, 27 were unable to use it as they were not prescribed an adrenaline auto-injector, and the final 15 responded that they handled their symptoms via another method because none of the above options apply.

CONCLUSIONS

Most children who developed symptoms which an adrenaline auto-injector was recommended had no prescription for an adrenaline auto-injector. There is thus a need for appropriate response training to anaphylaxis whether or not an adrenaline auto-injector was prescribed.

Idiopathic Anaphylaxis: A Form of Mast Cell Activation Syndrome

Idiopathic anaphylaxis is a condition caused by paroxysmal episodes of sudden-onset multiorgan involvement variably including laryngeal edema, urticaria, bronchoconstriction, dyspnea, hypoxia, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and hypotension. Rarely, the episodes can lead to cardiovascular collapse and death in the absence of a clear trigger, especially in the presence of other cardiovascular comorbidities. Elevated mast cell mediators such as tryptase and histamine have been reported during episodes, and mast cells are considered the primary cells responsible for driving anaphylaxis in humans. Basophils also secrete histamine and LTC4 when activated and theoretically can contribute to symptoms. As our understanding of mast cell disorders continue to grow, the classification for these disorders evolves. The purpose of this article was 2-fold: to review the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis of idiopathic anaphylaxis and to discuss the classification of idiopathic anaphylaxis within the broader context of mast cell activation disorders.

Gastrointestinal Food Allergies and Intolerances

Adverse reactions to food include immune-mediated food allergies, celiac disease, and nonimmune-mediated food intolerances. Differentiating between these many disorders is important to guide us toward appropriate testing and management. Double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges are the gold standard for food allergy diagnosis but are difficult and time-consuming. In place of this, strong clinical history, other supportive tests, and oral food challenges are helpful. Some commonly available tests for food allergy and intolerances lack sufficient evidence for efficacy. Food intolerance diagnosis is largely based on history and supported by symptom improvement with appropriate dietary manipulation.

A pediatric case of food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis due to rice bran

Food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (FDEIA) caused by fruits and vegetables is increasing in recent years, but rice-induced FDEIA is rarely reported. The mechanism of FDEIA is unclear, although percutaneous sensitization occurs in some cases. A 14-year-old adolescent came our hospital who had 6 episodes of unknown FDEIA occurring from age 13. He affected atopic dermatitis in infancy, and he had been polishing rice daily to help with housework, and also had occasionally begun to observe urticaria while bathing after eating rice from 5 years old. Antigen-specific immunoglobulin E antibody titers (ImmunoCAP) were 1.35 UAmL for rice, 23.6 UAmL for orchard grass. Oral food challenge and exercise provocation test with polished rice were negative. An oral food challenge with rice bran was also negative, but exercise provocation test induced severe anaphylaxis. IgE immunoblotting with rice bran detected patient-specific bands, as 25-, 35-, 50-, and 60 kDa, and the 25- and 60-kDa bands were heat-resistant. In a suppression test using rice bran, these bands disappeared or diminished. In an inhibition test against orchard grass pollen with rice bran, inhibition was not observed. Conversely, an inhibition test against rice bran with orchard grass pollen, inhibition was observed in a concentration-dependent manner. This is extremely rare case of FDEIA in children, caused by rice bran. Furthermore, it might be induced by percutaneous sensitization. In FDEIA, it is necessary to scrutinize the possibility that rice bran may be the cause even in children.

Design, Assessment, and Validation of a Questionnaire to Estimate Food-Dependent Exercise-Induced Anaphylaxis Prevalence in Latin American Population

There are no epidemiological data about food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (FDEIA) in Latin America. Our aim was to design, assess, and validate a questionnaire to identify potential FDEIA cases and/or estimate its prevalence by self-report. Questions were included in the instrument to address the main symptoms of FDEIA, type/intensity of physical activity, and anaphylaxis. The instrument’s clarity, comprehension and repeatability were evaluated. These evaluations were carried out by Hispanic people (Argentinians/Colombians/Mexicans/Peruvians), including nine individuals with medical diagnosis of FDEIA, and Brazilians. The Flesch–Kincaid score was calculated using the INFLESZ software. The instrument was translated from Spanish to Brazilian Portuguese following the translation back-translation procedure. The participants rated the two versions of the questionnaire as clear and comprehensible (three-point ordinal scale) and very easy to understand [0.33; average (scale 0–10)]. For these evaluations, the Kendall’s W coefficient showed strong agreement among raters (W = 0.80; average). The Flesch–Kincaid score was 63.5 in average (documents considered as readable). The Cohen’s Kappa coefficient showed almost perfect agreement in repeatability (0.88; average). The validation process of two versions of an instrument, used to identify potential FDEIA cases, was successfully carried out and it was found applicable to Latin American countries for generating epidemiological data.

Exercise plasma metabolomics and xenometabolomics in obese, sedentary, insulin-resistant women: impact of a fitness and weight loss intervention

Insulin resistance has wide-ranging effects on metabolism, but there are knowledge gaps regarding the tissue origins of systemic metabolite patterns and how patterns are altered by fitness and metabolic health. To address these questions, plasma metabolite patterns were determined every 5 min during exercise (30 min, ∼45% of V̇o_2peak, ∼63 W) and recovery in overnight-fasted sedentary, obese, insulin-resistant women under controlled conditions of diet and physical activity. We hypothesized that improved fitness and insulin sensitivity following a ∼14-wk training and weight loss intervention would lead to fixed workload plasma metabolomics signatures reflective of metabolic health and muscle metabolism. Pattern analysis over the first 15 min of exercise, regardless of pre- versus postintervention status, highlighted anticipated increases in fatty acid tissue uptake and oxidation (e.g., reduced long-chain fatty acids), diminution of nonoxidative fates of glucose [e.g., lowered sorbitol-pathway metabolites and glycerol-3-galactoside (possible glycerolipid synthesis metabolite)], and enhanced tissue amino acid use (e.g., drops in amino acids; modest increase in urea). A novel observation was that exercise significantly increased several xenometabolites ("non-self" molecules, from microbes or foods), including benzoic acid-salicylic acid-salicylaldehyde, hexadecanol-octadecanol-dodecanol, and chlorogenic acid. In addition, many nonannotated metabolites changed with exercise. Although exercise itself strongly impacted the global metabolome, there were surprisingly few intervention-associated differences despite marked improvements in insulin sensitivity, fitness, and adiposity. These results and previously reported plasma acylcarnitine profiles support the principle that most metabolic changes during submaximal aerobic exercise are closely tethered to absolute ATP turnover rate (workload), regardless of fitness or metabolic health status.

Diagnosis and prevention of food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis

Introduction: Food-dependent, exercise-induced anaphylaxis (FDEIA) is a rare type of anaphylaxis with a growing incidence. Although the precise mechanism by which the patient reacts only in a combination of a culprit food and cofactors are not currently understood, many advances in diagnosis and management have been made since their first description. Areas covered: A literature search in PubMed was performed to review the diagnosis and management of FDEIA. Clinicians should have a high level of suspicion for identification of the culprit foods and the cofactors involved. Component-resolved diagnosis and more accurate provocation tests have revolutionized the diagnosis accuracy. Management is not easy and involves educating the patient to evict the combination of exposure to the culprit foods and the cofactors that elicit anaphylaxis, and how to act and treat if a reaction occurs. Expert opinion: FDEIA is currently misdiagnosed and the authors believe that there are many FDEIA patients labelled as idiopathic anaphylaxis with unnecessary evictions and with a poor quality of life because of the fear of an imminent reaction. Due to recent advances in diagnostic tools and the use of monoclonal antibodies for prophylaxis in persistent cases, FDEIA can have a better prognosis improving the quality of life of the patients and their families.