Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Therapies: Patient Selection, Prosthesis Assessment and Selection, Results, and Future Directions

Urgent Transcatheter Mitral Valve-in-Valve Replacement With Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support: Case Report and Review of the Literature

Critical mitral valve stenosis due to a failed bioprosthetic valve is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, with the transcatheter Valve-in-Valve (ViV) approach becoming a popular treatment option. We present a case of cardiogenic shock secondary to a stenotic mitral bio-prosthetic valve. The Heart team was consulted; the patient was a high-risk surgical candidate for valve replacement. He required venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to definitive therapy. The patient underwent a successful urgent transcatheter mitral ViV procedure with a trans-septal approach. Follow-up echocardiography showed significant improvement in mitral valve dynamics. Recently emerging transcatheter approaches for mitral ViV implantation after balloon valvuloplasty into a failed mitral valve prosthesis are technically feasible in high-risk patient populations and should be considered over re-operative mitral valve surgery.

Hemodynamic follow-up after valve-in-valve TAVR for failed aortic bioprosthesis

BACKGROUND

"valve-in-valve" TAVR (VIV-TAVR) is established and provides good initial clinical and hemodynamic outcomes. Lacking long-term durability data baffle the expand to lower risk patients. For those purposes, the present study adds a hemodynamic 3-years follow-up.

METHODS

A total of 77 patients underwent VIV-TAVR for failing aortic bioprosthesis during a 7-years period. Predominant mode of failure was stenosis in 87.0%. Patients had a mean age of 79.4 ± 5.8 years and a logistic EuroSCORE of 30.8 ± 15.7%. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons-PROM averaged 5.79 ± 2.63%. Clinical results and hemodynamic outcomes are reported for 30-days, 1-, 2-, and 3-years. Completeness of follow-up was 100% with 44 patients at risk after 3-years. Follow-up ranged up to 7.1 years.

RESULTS

Majority of the surgical valves were stented (94.8%) with a mean labeled size of 23.1 ± 2.3 mm and true-ID of 20.4 ± 2.6 mm. A true-ID ≤21 mm had 58.4% of the patients. Self-expanding valves were implanted in 68.8% (mean labeled size 24.1 ± 1.8 mm) and balloon-expanded in 31.2% (mean size 24.1 ± 1.8 mm). No patient died intraoperatively. Hospital mortality was 1.3% and three-years survival 57.1%. All patients experienced an initial significant dPmean-reduction to 16.8 ± 7.1 mmHg. After 3-years mean dPmean raised to 26.0 ± 12.2 mmHg. This observation was independent from true-ID or type of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)-prosthesis. Patients with a true-ID ≤21 mm had a higher initial (18.3 ± 5.3 vs. 14.9 ± 7.1 mmHg; p = .005) and dPmean after 1-year (29.2 ± 8.2 vs. 13.0 ± 6.7 mmHg; p = .004). There were no significant differences in survival.

CONCLUSIONS

VIV-TAVR is safe and effective in the early period. In surgical valves with a true-ID ≤21 mm inferior hemodynamic and survival outcomes must be expected. Nonetheless, also patients with larger true-IDs showed steadily increasing transvalvular gradients. This raises concern about durability.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve-in-Valve Procedure in Patients with Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Deterioration

Surgical aortic valve replacement is the gold standard procedure to treat patients with severe, symptomatic aortic valve stenosis or insufficiency. Bioprosthetic valves are used for surgical aortic valve replacement with a much greater prevalence than mechanical valves. However, bioprosthetic valves may fail over time because of structural valve deterioration; this often requires intervention due to severe bioprosthetic valve stenosis or regurgitation or a combination of both. In select patients, transcatheter aortic valve replacement is an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement. Transcatheter valve-in-valve (ViV) replacement is performed by implanting a transcatheter heart valve within a failing bioprosthetic valve. The transcatheter ViV operation is a less invasive procedure compared with reoperative surgical aortic valve replacement, but it has been associated with specific complications and requires extensive preoperative work-up and planning by the heart team. Data from experimental studies and analyses of results from clinical procedures have led to strategies to improve outcomes of these procedures. The type, size, and implant position of the transcatheter valve can be optimized for individual patients with knowledge of detailed dimensions of the surgical valve and radiographic and echocardiographic measurements of the patient's anatomy. Understanding the complexities of the ViV procedure can lead surgeons to make choices during the original surgical valve implantation that can make a future ViV operation more technically feasible years before it is required.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Under Direct Visualization in Homograft Valve Endocarditis

Prosthetic valve endocarditis is a very grave and often terminal disease. Surgical valve replacement remains the cornerstone treatment for this disease. However, it is often contraindicated. Herein, we describe the implantation under direct visualization of a self-expandable transcatheter heart valve in a prohibitive surgical risk patient with homograft aortic valve endocarditis.

Transapical Mitral Valve-in-Valve Implantation Using an Edwards SAPIEN 3 Prosthesis

We report a case of transapical mitral valve-in-valve implantation for a deteriorated bioprosthesis using the SAPIEN 3. Our patient, a 79-year-old man, with a history of mitral valve replacement 10 years before, presented with acute dyspnea due to mitral valve dysfunction. He was successfully treated with transapical implantation and had an uneventful recovery. Our case demonstrates the feasibility of using SAPIEN 3 in treating degenerated bioprosthetic mitral valves.

Impact of Ross Operation on Outcome in Young Female Adult Patients Wanting to Have Children

BACKGROUND

The most appropriate valve substitute at aortic valve replacement (AVR) for young female adult patients wanting to have children is unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between 1992 and 2013, 12 consecutive female patients aged >18 (median, 22.5 years; range, 18-34 years) underwent Ross operation (Ross group). Between 1984 and 2013, 9 consecutive female patients aged >18 (median, 30 years; range, 22-39 years) underwent AVR with bioprosthesis (bioprosthesis group). There was 1 late mortality in the bioprosthesis group, due to prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE). Freedom from reoperation for aortic valve at 15 years was 90.0% in the Ross group, and 57.1% in the bioprosthesis group (log-rank, P=0.098). One in the Ross group underwent reoperation for aortic regurgitation (AR), whereas 4 in the bioprosthesis group did so for aortic stenosis (AS) in 2, combined AS and AR in 1, and PVE in 1. Five patients in the Ross group and 3 in the bioprosthesis group had 7 and 4 uneventful pregnancies, respectively. AR progressed during the perinatal period in a total of 7 of 11 pregnancies. No AS was seen at discharge, after 5 years, or during pregnancy in the Ross group.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term outcome of Ross operation for female patients wanting to have children is excellent. Although subclinical pulmonary autograft valve regurgitation during pregnancy was often observed, pulmonary autograft stenosis did not occur, therefore it would be an ideal option for patients wanting to have children.

The freestyle aortic bioprosthesis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The Medtronic Freestyle bioprosthesis (FSB) provides an alternative to other prostheses for both aortic valve and aortic root surgery. This paper is a systematic review of the post-operative outcomes in patients with aortic valve and/or aortic root disease following FSB implantation.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for primary analysis, prospective randomised studies comparing the FSB with an alternative aortic prosthesis were included. Additionally, case series that included data for at least 100 individual operated patients were used for secondary analysis.

RESULTS

Among three identified randomised studies, 199 FSB cases were compared with homografts, and stented and an alternative stentless bioprosthesis. The FSB showed comparable hospital mortality (4.5% vs. 5.3%) and eight-year actuarial survival (80±5.0% versus 77±6.0%) with the homograft (respectively) and comparable reduction in left ventricular mass index relative to other prosthesis types. Over 6000 individual patients were included in the selected 15 case series. Weighted mean operative mortality, neurological event rate and five-year actuarial survival was 5.2%, 5.5% and 77.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The FSB performed comparably against alternative prostheses regarding in-hospital mortality, long-term survival and reduction in left ventricular mass index. Included case series demonstrated robust post-operative outcomes in both the short and long term.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation reduces grade of concomitant mitral and tricuspid valve regurgitation and pulmonary hypertension

OBJECTIVES

The presence of concomitant mitral (MR) or tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a common issue in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The objective was (i) to analyse the outcomes of patients with concomitant moderate or more severe MR, (ii) to compare the outcomes with those of TAVI patients without concomitant MR and (iii) to evaluate the impact of TAVI on grade of concomitant MR.

METHODS

For creating a homogeneous study group, the study was restricted to transapical (TA)-TAVI patients. Since 2008, 615 patients have undergone TAVI at our institution, 386 of these using the TA approach with the Edwards SAPIEN™ bioprosthesis. Out of these, 116 (30.1%) presented with concomitant moderate or more severe MR. Mean logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk (EuroSCORE) was 18.1 ± 11.5%, EuroSCORE II 5.4 ± 0.7%. Intra- and post-hospital course, change in grade of MR, TR, right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) were particularly analysed. Outcomes were compared with those of the remaining TA-TAVI patients (n = 270). Mean follow-up time was 471 ± 391 days, giving a total of 135 patient-years.

RESULTS

Three patients (2.6%) died during primary hospital stay. Estimated 1-, 2-, 3- and 4-year survival rates were 76.7, 75.6, 68.3 and 50.6% for study and 78.1, 77.8, 61.1 and 55.0% for control groups, respectively. Postoperative morbidity and mortality did not differ significantly from those of the control group. Postoperatively, a significant reduction in MR (2.1 ± 0.2 to 1.5 ± 0.7; P < 0.01) and TR (1.9 ± 0.5 to 1.5 ± 0.7; P < 0.01) was observed. Likewise, RVSP decreased significantly from 46 ± 16 to 39 ± 15 mmHg (P < 0.01) and TAPSE non-significantly (21.9 ± 7.3 to 19.5 ± 5.5 mm; P = 0.07). After 3-6 months, 68.9% of the patients were at New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class I or II, 25% at Class III and 6.0% downgraded to Class IV. A reason for remaining in NYHA Class III or downgrading to NYHA Class IV could not be detected, and particularly, there was no impact of grade of MR/TR, left ventricular ejection fraction, TAPSE or right ventricular endsystolic pressure (RVESP) on outcomes or NYHA class.

CONCLUSION

TA-TAVI in patients with concomitant moderate or more severe MR provides results comparable with those of TA-TAVI in general. Concomitant MR had no significant impact on the short- and mid-term outcomes. A significant reduction in MR, TR and pulmonary hypertension was observed after TA-TAVI during short-term follow-up. Nonetheless, a relevant number of patients did not experience an improvement in NYHA class.