1
|
von Deimling M, Mertens LS, Furrer M, Li R, Tendijck GAH, Taylor J, Crocetto F, Maas M, Mari A, Pichler R, Moschini M, Tully KH, D'Andrea D, Laukhtina E, Del Giudice F, Marcq G, Velev M, Gallioli A, Albisinni S, Mori K, Khanna A, Rink M, Fisch M, Minervini A, Black PC, Lotan Y, Spiess PE, Kiss B, Shariat SF, Pradere B. The optimal number of induction chemotherapy cycles in clinically lymph node-positive bladder cancer. BJU Int 2024; 134:119-127. [PMID: 38470089 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the optimal number of induction chemotherapy cycles needed to achieve a pathological response in patients with clinically lymph node-positive (cN+) bladder cancer (BCa) who received three or four cycles of induction chemotherapy followed by consolidative radical cystectomy (RC) with pelvic lymph node dissection. PATIENTS AND METHODS We included 388 patients who received three or four cycles of cisplatin/gemcitabine or (dose-dense) methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC), followed by consolidative RC for cTanyN1-3M0 BCa. We compared pathological complete (pCR = ypT0N0) and objective response (pOR = yp ≤T1N0) between treatment groups. Predictors of pCR and/or pOR were assessed using uni- and multivariable logistic regression analysis. The secondary endpoints were overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). We evaluated the association between the number of induction chemotherapy cycles administered and survival outcomes on multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS Overall, 101 and 287 patients received three or four cycles of induction chemotherapy, respectively. Of these, 72 (19%) and 128 (33%) achieved pCR and pOR response, respectively. The pCR (20%, 18%) and pOR (40%, 31%) rates did not differ significantly between patients receiving three or four cycles (P > 0.05). The number of cycles was not associated with pCR or pOR on multivariable logistic regression analyses. The 2-year OS estimates were 63% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.74) and 63% (95% CI 0.58-0.7) for patients receiving three or four cycles, respectively. Receiving three vs four cycles was not associated with OS and CSS on uni- or multivariable Cox regression analyses. CONCLUSION Pathological response and survival outcomes did not differ between administering three or four induction chemotherapy cycles in patients with cN+ BCa. A fewer cycles (minimum three) may be oncologically sufficient in patients with cN+ BCa, while decreasing the wait for definitive local therapy in those patients who end up without a response to chemotherapy. This warrants further validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus von Deimling
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Laura S Mertens
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc Furrer
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Urology, Solothurner Spitäler AG, Kantonsspital Olten and Bürgerspital Solothurn, Switzerland
| | - Roger Li
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Guus A H Tendijck
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jacob Taylor
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Moritz Maas
- Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Andrea Mari
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Renate Pichler
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Innsbruck, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Karl H Tully
- Department of Urology and Neurourology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Gautier Marcq
- Department of Urology, CHU Lille, Claude Huriez Hospital, Lille, France
- CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, UMR9020-U1277 - CANTHER - Cancer Heterogeneity Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, University of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Maud Velev
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Andrea Gallioli
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Simone Albisinni
- Urology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, Tor Vergata University Hospital, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
- Service d'Urologie, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, Marienkrankenhaus, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Margit Fisch
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Peter C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Bernhard Kiss
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Urosud, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Calleris G, von Deimling M, Kesch C, Soria F, Gontero P, Ploussard G, Laukhtina E, Pradere B. Definitions, outcomes and perspectives for oligometastatic bladder cancer: towards a standardized terminology. Curr Opin Urol 2024; 34:217-224. [PMID: 38426242 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Oligometastatic (om) cancer is considered as a transitional state in between locally confined disease and widespread metastases, accessible to a multimodal treatment, combining systemic and local therapy. In urothelial bladder cancer (BCa), the definitions and the approaches to this condition are poorly standardised and mainly based on retrospective data. We aim to portray the framework for uro-oncologic terminology in omBCa and go through the latest evidence and the future perspectives. RECENT FINDINGS Retrospective and registry data support the potential benefits of multimodality treatment for carefully selected omBCa patients, especially following a good response to systemic treatment. In 2023, a Delphi consensus has defined omBCa, allowing maximum three metastatic lesions, theoretically amenable to radical local treatment. In de-novo omBCa, surgical treatment of primary tumour might improve overall survival (OS), according to a matched registry analysis; also, consolidative radiotherapy was associated with better OS in two recent cohorts. Furthermore, metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) has shown high local control rates and promising OS (14.9-51 months) in a meta-analysis; benefits might be more pronounced for single-site omBCa and nodal or lung lesions. SUMMARY From a clinical perspective, in de-novo omBCa, the local treatment of primary and metastatic sites might improve disease control and survival, in selected patients; in the oligorecurrent setting, MDT achieves good local symptom control with limited side effects; in selected cases, it could convey a survival benefit, too. From a research perspective, well designed prospective evidence is eagerly awaited, based on recently adopted shared definitions for omBCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Calleris
- Department of Urology UROSUD, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
- Polytechnic and University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Markus von Deimling
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Claudia Kesch
- Department of Urology UROSUD, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
- Department of Urology and West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Guillaume Ploussard
- Department of Urology UROSUD, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology UROSUD, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Both radiographical and pathological lymph node statuses are independent predictors for survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical cystectomy for cT3/4 or cN+ bladder cancer. World J Urol 2023; 41:101-107. [PMID: 36269368 PMCID: PMC9849310 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04187-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) with clinical suspicion of locally advanced growth or pelvic lymphogenic spread has a high risk of progression and death. PATIENTS AND METHODS Bladder cancer patients with locally advanced (cT3/4) tumor growth or suspected pelvic lymphogenic spread (cN+) were treated with preoperative cisplatin-containing chemotherapy and consolidative cystectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy. We aimed to identify prognostic factors and describe the patients' oncological outcome. RESULTS A complete dataset including follow-up data was available for 96 patients. In a univariate analysis, we identified cN stage (cN+ vs cN-, HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.3-6.0), response to chemotherapy (HR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.5), ypT stage (ypT0/is/1 vs ypT2-4, HR 3.1, 95% CI 1.4-6.8), ypN stage (ypN + vs ypN-, HR 7.9, 95% CI 3.7-17.0), resection status (HR 4.4, 95% CI HR 1.5-13.0) as significantly associated with cancer-specific survival. In a multivariate regression analysis, both cN and ypN statuses were validated as independent prognostic factors for cancer-specific survival (cN: HR 2.6, 95% CI 1.1-6.1; ypN: HR 5.5, 95% CI 2.0-15.1). DISCUSSION Lymph node status was identified as a prognostic marker in a high-risk cohort of UBC patients treated with inductive chemotherapy and cystectomy. Establishing cN status as a prognosticator underlines the necessity to aggressively treat these patients despite reported impreciseness of imaging procedures in UCB. Patients with histologically positive lymph nodes following preoperative chemotherapy have a very poor prognosis, and thus, the need for adjuvant systemic treatment is emphasized. CONCLUSION Both clinically and pathologically affected lymph nodes convey a poor prognosis in bladder cancer and necessitate aggressive treatment.
Collapse
|
4
|
Ibilibor C, Kennady EH, Greene KL. The role of surgery for locally advanced urothelial cancers. Curr Opin Urol 2022; 32:614-617. [PMID: 36081394 PMCID: PMC11188720 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Extirpative surgery can play an important role in the management strategies for locally advanced urothelial carcinoma. The current review is intended to relay current information reported in the literature over the past 12 months regarding the usage of surgical resection in advanced urothelial cancers of the bladder and upper tracts, document operative outcomes, and oncologic efficacy. RECENT FINDINGS Multimodal therapy is key to long-term overall survival for advanced urothelial carcinoma. Radical cystectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection can be performed after an observable response to chemotherapy or immunotherapy for cT4 or cN2 and higher node-positive disease of the bladder. Moreover, radical cystectomy after trimodal therapy similarly yields durable local response. For upper tract disease, nephroureterectomy with regional lymphadenectomy is the primary surgical modality used often in conjunction with perioperative cisplatin-based chemotherapy. SUMMARY Surgical resection as a monotherapy is not curative in patients with locally advanced urothelial carcinoma. However, its use in combination with systemic agents can potentiate durable long-term survival in a subset of patients. Future studies investigating patient-reported outcomes among those receiving consolidative surgery for locally advanced disease are warranted to guide clinical recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Ibilibor
- University of Virginia, Department of Urology, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sorce G, Chierigo F, Flammia RS, Hoeh B, Hohenhorst L, Tian Z, Goyal JA, Graefen M, Terrone C, Gallucci M, Chun FKH, Saad F, Shariat SF, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Karakiewicz PI. Survival trends in chemotherapy exposed metastatic bladder cancer patients and chemotherapy effect across different age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:380.e19-380.e27. [PMID: 35431135 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To test for survival differences in metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder (mUCUB) patients, according to years of diagnosis, age, sex, and race/ethnicity over time and for the effect of chemotherapy on overall mortality (OM). MATERIALS AND METHODS Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (2000-2016), we identified 6860 mUCUB patients. Of those, 3,249 were exposed to chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox regression models focused on OM. First, we tested the effect of years of diagnosis (historical [2000-2005] vs. intermediate [2006-2011] vs. contemporary [2012-2016]) in chemotherapy exposed mUCUB patients. Second, we tested the effect of chemotherapy in all mUCUB patients. RESULTS In chemotherapy exposed mUCUB patients according to historical vs. intermediate vs. contemporary years, median overall survival was 11 vs. 13 vs. 14 months respectively, which translated into hazard ratios (HR) of 0.86 (P = 0.005) and 0.75 (P < 0.001) in intermediate and contemporary vs. historical, respectively. Subgroup analyses in <70 years old, males and Caucasians were in agreement regarding statistically significant differences between historical vs. intermediate vs. contemporary, respectively. In multivariable Cox regression models fitted in the entire mUCUB cohort, chemotherapy exposure reduced OM (HR: 0.46; P < 0.001). Virtually the same results were recorded in age, sex, and race/ethnicity subgroups analyses. CONCLUSIONS Contemporary chemotherapy exposed mUCUB patients exhibited better survival than their historical and intermediate counterparts. Chemotherapy reduced mortality by half, across all patient types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Sorce
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| | - Francesco Chierigo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Rocco Simone Flammia
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Maternal-Child and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Benedikt Hoeh
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Lukas Hohenhorst
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Carlo Terrone
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Michele Gallucci
- Department of Maternal-Child and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Departments of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Praga, Czech Republic; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|