Importance of Recent Fracture as Predictor of Imminent Fracture Risk

Treatment Considerations for Severe Osteoporosis in Older Adults

Osteoporosis, a chronic metabolic bone disease, increases the predisposition to fragility fractures and is associated with considerable morbidity, high health care cost as well as mortality. An elevation in the rate of incident fragility fractures will be observed proportional with the increase in the number of older people worldwide. Severe osteoporosis is currently defined as having a bone density determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry that is more than 2.5 standard deviations (SD) below the young adult mean with one or more past fractures due to osteoporosis. Nutrition, physical activity and adequate vitamin D are essential for optimal bone strength throughout life. Hormone (oestrogen/sex steroid) status is also a major determinant of bone health. This review explores mechanisms involved in bone homeostasis, followed by the assessment and management of severe osteoporosis, including an overview of several treatment options in older people that range from anti-resorptive to anabolic therapies.

Incidence of Secondary Fractures After Implementation of Different Models of FLS Secondary Prevention Programs: Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

As the number of programs aimed at preventing fragility fractures and mitigating the phenomenon of cascade fractures is increasing worldwide, so it is necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of such programs to seek their feasible implementation at regional and global levels.

AIMS

This paper aims to provide an overview focusing on the incidence of secondary fractures after the implementation of any type of fracture liaison service (FLS). To this end, a scoping review was conducted focusing on the identification of clinical evidence reported in systematic reviews of the medical literature in this area.

METHODS

A total of 230 titles were obtained through structured searches in four electronic libraries (updated to September 2023), from which a total of 11 systematic reviews were selected.

RESULTS

Tables of methodological characteristics were developed. Different programs such as orthogeriatric units, educational strategies, exercise strategies, screening strategies using DXA or FRAX, and specialist intervention by orthopedic specialists or osteoporosis nurses were found in 20 different countries. The reported incidence of secondary fractures varies between populations and strategies compared depending on the data collected and the type of methodological design used. The incidence of secondary fractures in these 11 systematic reviews ranged from 0 to 37%.

CONCLUSION

The incidence by intervention is described in the Supplementary Tables of the primary studies.

Short-term risk of fracture is increased by deficits in cortical and trabecular bone microarchitecture independent of DXA BMD and FRAX: Bone Microarchitecture International Consortium (BoMIC) prospective cohorts

Identifying individuals at risk for short-term fracture is essential to offer prompt beneficial treatment, especially since many fractures occur in those without osteoporosis by DXA-aBMD. We evaluated whether deficits in bone microarchitecture and density predict short-term fracture risk independent of the clinical predictors, DXA-BMD and FRAX. We combined data from eight cohorts to conduct a prospective study of bone microarchitecture at the distal radius and tibia (by HR-pQCT) and 2-year incidence of fracture (non-traumatic and traumatic) in 7327 individuals (4824 women, 2503 men, mean 69 ± 9 years). We estimated sex-specific hazard ratios (HR) for associations between bone measures and 2-year fracture incidence, adjusted for age, cohort, height, and weight, and then additionally adjusted for FN aBMD or FRAX for major osteoporotic fracture. Only 7% of study participants had FN T-score ≤ -2.5, whereas 53% had T-scores between -1.0 and -2.5 and 37% had T-scores ≥-1.0. Two-year cumulative fracture incidence was 4% (296/7327). Each SD decrease in radius cortical bone measures increased fracture risk by 38%-76% for women and men. After additional adjustment for FN-aBMD, risks remained increased by 28%-61%. Radius trabecular measures were also associated with 2-year fracture risk independently of FN-aBMD in women (HRs range: 1.21 per SD for trabecular separation to 1.55 for total vBMD). Decreased failure load (FL) was associated with increased fracture risk in both women and men (FN-aBMD ranges of adjusted HR = 1.47-2.42). Tibia measurement results were similar to radius results. Findings were also similar when models were adjusted for FRAX. In older adults, FL and HR-pQCT measures of cortical and trabecular bone microarchitecture and density with strong associations to short-term fractures improved fracture prediction beyond aBMD and FRAX. Thus, HR-pQCT may be a useful adjunct to traditional assessment of short-term fracture risk in older adults, including those with T-scores above the osteoporosis range.

Goal-directed osteoporosis treatment: ASBMR/BHOF task force position statement 2024

The overarching goal of osteoporosis management is to prevent fractures. A goal-directed approach to long-term management of fracture risk helps ensure that the most appropriate initial treatment and treatment sequence is selected for individual patients. Goal-directed treatment decisions require assessment of clinical fracture history, vertebral fracture identification (using vertebral imaging as appropriate), measurement of bone mineral density (BMD), and consideration of other major clinical risk factors. Treatment targets should be tailored to each patient's individual risk profile and based on the specific indication for beginning treatment, including recency, site, number and severity of prior fractures, and BMD levels at the total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine. Instead of first-line bisphosphonate treatment for all patients, selection of initial treatment should focus on reducing fracture risk rapidly for patients at very high and imminent risk, such as in those with recent fractures. Initial treatment selection should also consider the probability that a BMD treatment target can be attained within a reasonable period of time and the differential magnitude of fracture risk reduction and BMD impact with osteoanabolic versus antiresorptive therapy. This position statement of the ASBMR/BHOF Task Force on Goal-Directed Osteoporosis Treatment provides an overall summary of the major clinical recommendations about treatment targets and strategies to achieve those targets based on the best evidence available, derived primarily from studies in older postmenopausal women of European ancestry.

MRI-Based Vertebral Bone Quality Score Can Predict the Imminent New Vertebral Fracture After Vertebral Augmentation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The incidence of imminent new vertebral fracture (NVF) is notably high after vertebral augmentation (VA), but accurately assessing the imminent risk of NVF remains a great challenge. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the MRI-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score can predict the risk of imminent NVF after VA within a 2-year period.

METHODS

A total of 135 patients age 50 years and older who suffered from painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture and treated with VA were enrolled in this retrospective study. Each patient's VBQ scores were calculated from T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and short tau inversion recovery sequences of preoperative lumbar MRI. The clinical factors and VBQ score were integrated to create a predictive model by using the logistic regression algorithm and visualize by nomogram. Receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analyses were used to evaluate the predictive performance of the nomogram.

RESULTS

The mean VBQ-T1WI and VBQ-T2WI scores of the NVF group were 4.61 ± 0.55 and 0.89 ± 0.14, respectively, which were significantly higher than those of the without NVF group (3.99 ± 0.54 and 0.79 ± 0.12, respectively, P < .001), as well as the VBQ-combined score (0.75 ± 1.30 vs -0.80 ± 1.26, P < .001), which is the combination of VBQ-T1WI and VBQ-T2WI scores. On multivariate analysis, the predictors of imminent NVF included age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.064, 95% CI = 1.009-1.122, P = .022), previous vertebral fracture (OR = 2.089, 95% CI = 0.888-4.915, P = .091), and VBQ-combined score (OR = 2.239, 95% CI = 1.529-3.279, P < .001). The nomogram achieved superior performance with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.838 (95% CI: 0.773-0.904) in predicting the imminent NVF compared to the clinical factors or VBQ-combined score alone.

CONCLUSION

The VBQ score obtained from lumbar MRI can be used to assess the VBQ and predict the imminent NVF after VA in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.

Fracture risk prediction in postmenopausal women with traditional and machine learning models in a nationwide, prospective cohort study in Switzerland with validation in the UK Biobank

Fracture prediction is essential in managing patients with osteoporosis and is an integral component of many fracture prevention guidelines. We aimed to identify the most relevant clinical fracture risk factors in contemporary populations by training and validating short- and long-term fracture risk prediction models in 2 cohorts. We used traditional and machine learning survival models to predict risks of vertebral, hip, and any fractures on the basis of clinical risk factors, T-scores, and treatment history among participants in a nationwide Swiss Osteoporosis Registry (N = 5944 postmenopausal women, median follow-up of 4.1 yr between January 2015 and October 2022; a total of 1190 fractures during follow-up). The independent validation cohort comprised 5474 postmenopausal women from the UK Biobank with 290 incident fractures during follow-up. Uno's C-index and the time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristics curve were calculated to evaluate the performance of different machine learning models (Random survival forest and eXtreme Gradient Boosting). In the independent validation set, the C-index was 0.74 [0.58, 0.86] for vertebral fractures, 0.83 [0.7, 0.94] for hip fractures, and 0.63 [0.58, 0.69] for any fractures at year 2, and these values further increased for longer estimations of up to 7 yr. In comparison, the 10-yr fracture probability calculated with FRAX Switzerland was 0.60 [0.55, 0.64] for major osteoporotic fractures and 0.62 [0.49, 0.74] for hip fractures. The most important variables identified with Shapley additive explanations values were age, T-scores, and prior fractures, while number of falls was an important predictor of hip fractures. Performances of both traditional and machine learning models showed similar C-indices. We conclude that fracture risk can be improved by including the lumbar spine T-score, trabecular bone score, numbers of falls and recent fractures, and treatment information has a significant impact on fracture prediction.

[Translated article] Evaluation, differential diagnosis and treatment of vertebral osteoporosis: How to avoid the occurrence of new fractures

Osteoporosis is a highly prevalent and multifactorial disease whose main manifestation is the appearance of fragility or low-impact fractures. The most frequent locations of osteoporotic fractures occur at the vertebrae, femoral, distal end of the radius and humerus. Osteoporotic vertebral fracture deserves special mention among them due to its prevalence, importance as it often goes unnoticed and medium-long term consequences are: pain, deformity, disability and deterioration in quality of life. In this review we will focus on the classification and initial evaluation of the patient with osteoporosis, estimation of risk factors, laboratory and imaging studies for an adequate assessment using simple radiography, dual densitometry and magnetic resonance imaging. We will also address the main aspects of the differential diagnosis, treatment and prevention of vertebral fragility fracture, briefly reviewing the main therapeutic agents currently used for its prevention and treatment.

Romosozumab in patients who experienced an on-study fracture: post hoc analyses of the FRAME and ARCH phase 3 trials

Post hoc analysis of FRAME and ARCH revealed that on-study nonvertebral and vertebral fractures by Month 12 were less common in women initially treated with romosozumab versus placebo or alendronate. Recurrent fracture risk was also lower in romosozumab‑treated patients, and there were no fracture‑related complications. Results support continuing romosozumab treatment post‑fracture.

PURPOSE

Post hoc analysis evaluating efficacy and safety of romosozumab, administered in the immediate post‑fracture period, in the FRAME and ARCH phase 3 trials.

METHODS

In FRAME (NCT01575834) and ARCH (NCT01631214), postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were randomized 1:1 to romosozumab 210 mg monthly or comparator (FRAME, placebo; ARCH, alendronate 70 mg weekly) for 12 months, followed by antiresorptive therapy (FRAME, denosumab; ARCH, alendronate). In patients who experienced on-study nonvertebral or new/worsening vertebral fracture by Month 12, we report the following: fracture and treatment‑emergent adverse event (TEAE) incidence through 36 months, bone mineral density changes (BMD), and romosozumab timing. Due to the sample sizes employed, meaningful statistical comparisons between treatments were not possible.

RESULTS

Incidence of on-study nonvertebral and vertebral fractures by Month 12 was numerically lower in romosozumab- versus comparator-treated patients (FRAME, 1.6% and 0.5% versus 2.1% and 1.6%; ARCH, 3.4% and 3.3% versus 4.6% and 4.9%, respectively). In those who experienced on-study nonvertebral fracture by Month 12, recurrent nonvertebral and subsequent vertebral fracture incidences were numerically lower in patients initially treated with romosozumab versus comparator (FRAME, 3.6% [2/56] and 1.8% [1/56] versus 9.2% [7/76] and 3.9% [3/76]; ARCH, 10.0% [7/70] and 5.7% [4/70] versus 12.6% [12/95] and 8.4% [8/95], respectively). Among those with on-study vertebral fracture by Month 12, recurrent vertebral and subsequent nonvertebral fracture incidences were numerically lower with romosozumab versus comparator (FRAME, 0.0% [0/17] and 0.0% [0/17] versus 11.9% [7/59] and 8.5% [5/59]; ARCH, 9.0% [6/67] and 7.5% [5/67] versus 15.0% [15/100] and 16.0% [16/100], respectively). In patients with fracture by Month 12, no fracture‑related complications were reported in romosozumab-treated patients. BMD gains were numerically greater with romosozumab than comparators.

CONCLUSION

Data suggest support for the efficacy and safety of continuing romosozumab treatment following fracture.

TRIAL REGISTRATIONS

NCT01575834; NCT01631214.

Evaluation, differential diagnosis and treatment of vertebral osteoporosis: How to avoid the occurrence of new fractures

Osteoporosis is a highly prevalent and multifactorial disease whose main manifestation is the appearance of fragility or low-impact fractures. The most frequent locations of osteoporotic fractures occur at the vertebrae, femoral, distal end of the radius and humerus. Osteoporotic vertebral fracture deserves special mention among them due to its prevalence, importance as it often goes unnoticed and medium-long term consequences are: pain, deformity, disability and deterioration in quality of life. In this review we will focus on the classification and initial evaluation of the patient with osteoporosis, estimation of risk factors, laboratory and imaging studies for an adequate assessment using simple radiography, dual densitometry and magnetic resonance imaging. We will also address the main aspects of the differential diagnosis, treatment and prevention of vertebral fragility fracture, briefly reviewing the main therapeutic agents currently used for its prevention and treatment.

Osteoporosis and major fragility fractures (MOF) in sarcoidosis patients: association with disease severity

BACKGROUND

The reports on bone mineral loss or major osteoporosis fracture (MOF) in sarcoidosis are scarce and have conflicting outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and risk factors of MOF in sarcoidosis patients.

METHODS

In a single-center cohort of 382 patients with sarcoidosis (55.8 ± 11.6 years) we evaluated bone mineral density at lumbar spine, at femoral neck and at total hip and the presence of MOF. Lung function measurements including diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) were assessed. Chest X-rays were performed and radiological staging was done by Scadding score.

RESULTS

Ninety patients (23.6%) with sarcoidosis have history of a MOF. BMD T-scores were lower in sarcoidosis with MOF with respect to those without MOF, but the difference was statistically significant only for BMD at femoral neck (p < 0.05). Moreover, BMD values at total hip was positively correlated with DLCO (%) (p < 0.001). Prevalence of MOF was higher in patients with sarcoidosis with lung parenchymal involvement (radiological stages 2-4) than in patients with sarcoidosis in chest X-ray stages 0 and 1 (28.3 vs 19.2% respectively, p < 0.05). Moreover, multiple regression analyses showed that X-ray Scadding score was positively associated with MOF.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that MOF represent a common and important complication in patients with moderate/severe sarcoidosis. The chest X-ray evaluation and the pulmonary function test could allow to define the risk of MOF in sarcoidosis patients.

Orthogeriatric care-outcome of different fragility fractures

INTRODUCTION

Fragility fractures (FF) are associated with increased morbidity and mortality and reflect a dramatic turning point in the life of older adults. The scientific discourse is dominated by proximal femoral fractures, but FF affect multiple parts of the body and often precede hip fractures. Orthogeriatric co-management has multiple shown to improve patient's outcome. We hypothesize that all geriatric patients with FF benefit from orthogeriatric co-management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated all patients over 70 years with FF (hip joint, periprosthetic, spine, pelvic ring, and humerus) of our geriatric trauma center for the years 2019-2021, who received orthogeriatric co-management. Demographic data, fracture type, complications, discharge modality and in-hospital mortality were recorded. For patients transferred to geriatrics, the Barthel Index (BI) and the discharge modality were recorded. Primary outcome parameters were discharge modality and BI difference. Secondary outcome parameters were complication rates and in-hospital mortality. Logistic regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

555 patients (83.8 ± 6.5 years, 182 males, 373 females) were evaluated. 245 (44.1%) patients were referred to geriatrics for further orthogeriatric treatment. Positive predictors were age, surgery, and a high Charlson Comorbidity Index. The overall in-hospital mortality was 8.6% (n = 48) (5.8% (n = 32) during acute trauma care and 6.5% (n = 16) during stay in geriatrics). The mortality rate of nursing home residents was significantly higher compared to patients living at home (10.4% vs. 5.6%). The rate of non-surgical complications was 44.5%. 26.9% of patients living at home were discharged to a nursing home, while 51.3% were able to return home. The risk of admission to a nursing home was reduced for thoracolumbar fractures (OR = 0.22) and increased markedly for periprosthetic fractures (OR = 3.95). During orthogeriatric treatment, all fractures showed a significant increase in BI. Patients living at home benefited more than nursing home residents (20.5 ± 19.5 vs. 8.7 ± 18.0 points). The chance of a BI increase (> 19 points) was increased for hip and pelvic ring fractures. Devastating results showed patients with dementia. In comparison, mentally healthy patients had a 4.5-fold increased chance of increasing their BI (> 19 points).

CONCLUSIONS

Presented data shows that all patients with FF are at high risk for complications and could benefit from standardized orthogeriatric management. Modern patient care requires a holistic orthogeriatric approach to improve patient's outcome.

Trunk-to-leg-volume ratio is not associated with bone density or fracture risk in middle-aged adults: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

Unlike a high body mass index or waist circumference, a high trunk-to-leg-volume ratio does not associate with a lower risk of osteopenia/osteoporosis at the femoral neck. While elevated TLVR showed a suggestive association with a history of wrist fracture in women, additional research is needed to confirm this suggestion.

PURPOSE

Body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) are commonly used to predict bone health, which is typically assessed via bone mineral density (BMD). Trunk-to-leg-volume ratio (TLVR), a relatively novel measure, predicts cardiometabolic outcomes, but its relationships with BMD and fracture remain unstudied. This study evaluated these anthropometric measures' associations with BMD and fracture in Americans aged 40-60 years.

METHODS

Analyses of middle-aged adults from the 2013-2014 to 2017-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were conducted. Whole-body, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was used to quantify TLVR as well as BMD at the lumbar spine, while a femur-specific scan was used to quantify femoral neck BMD. Fracture history was self-reported. Linear and logistic regression models were constructed with age, diabetes, smoking, race/ethnicity, education, and physical activity as confounding variables.

RESULTS

TLVR was generally not associated with BMD, while WC and BMI showed positive associations with femoral neck BMD. Odds of osteopenia/osteoporosis at the femoral neck were ~ 65-80% lower among participants in the highest tertile of BMI and WC versus the lowest (p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant associations between anthropometric predictors and fracture. Women in tertiles 2 or 3 of TLVR (p = 0.097 and 0.079, respectively) did have 2.66 times the odds of wrist fracture than women in tertile 1, but this was not significant.

CONCLUSION

As shown in previous research, BMI and WC show positive associations with femoral BMD. In contrast, the more novel anthropometric marker TLVR shows no association with femoral BMD, and no clear association with fracture.

Osteoporosis treatment gap in patients at risk of fracture in Egypt: a multi-center, cross-sectional observational study

Despite the wide availability of a wide variety of approved osteoporosis medications and DXA scan centers in Egypt, only a minority of patients at high risk of sustaining a fragility fracture receive treatment, even after their first fracture. Such big "treatment gap" leaves the most high-risk individuals unprotected against fragility fractures. This study provides a benchmark to monitor national trends in osteoporosis management and service uptake.

PURPOSE

To assess the treatment gap among men and postmenopausal women presenting with a fragility fracture, and to analyze the characteristics and fracture risks of the patients presenting with an index fragility fracture.

METHODS

This was a multi-center, cross-sectional, observational study. Both men and postmenopausal women, admitted with an osteoporotic fracture (whether major osteoporosis or hip fracture), were consecutively recruited for this work. The fracture risk was assessed based on their FRAX calculation prior to the index fracture. All the patients were assessed for their falls and sarcopenia risks. Blood tests for bone profile as well as DXA scan were offered to all the patients.

RESULTS

Two hundred and thirty-six patients presenting with fragility fractures were included in this work. 70.8% were women and 29.2% were men. Mean age was 70.1 (SD = 9.2) years. Ten-year probability of fracture (without BMD) was high in 65.9% of the postmenopausal women and 40.3% of the men. 82.1% of the postmenopausal women and 100% in men identified to be eligible for osteoporosis therapy did not receive any form of osteoporosis therapy. FRAX score correlated significantly with bone mineral density assessment at both hip and spine. Falls, sarcopenia, and functional disability showed significant relation to the fracture risk.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a large treatment gap in Egyptian older adults. The recent guidelines for osteoporosis management in Egypt endorsed fracture centric approach to identify people at risk. The gap appears to be related to a low rate of osteoporosis diagnosis and lack of patient education.

Post hip fracture orthogeriatric care-a Canadian position paper addressing challenges in care and strategies to meet quality indicators

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporosis is a major disease state associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. Less than half of the individuals sustaining a low energy hip fracture are diagnosed and treated for the underlying osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVE

A multidisciplinary Canadian hip fracture working group has developed practical recommendations to meet Canadian quality indicators in post hip fracture care.

METHODS

A comprehensive narrative review was conducted to identify and synthesize key articles on post hip fracture orthogeriatric care for each of the individual sections and develop recommendations. These recommendations are based on the best evidence available today.

CONCLUSION

Recommendations are anticipated to reduce recurrent fractures, improve mobility and healthcare outcomes post hip fracture, and reduce healthcare costs. Key messages to enhance postoperative care are also provided.

Risk factors for refracture after proximal femur fragility fracture

Introduction

Proximal femur fragility fractures (PFFFs) are a growing worldwide concern. Recognizing the risk factors for subsequent fracture is essential for secondary prevention. This study aimed to analyze the risk factors for refracture and mortality rates in patients who suffered a PFFF.

Methods

Patients aged 65 years or older with PFFF who underwent surgical treatment during the year of 2017 in the same institution were retrospectively analyzed and at least four years after the index fracture were evaluated.

Results

From a total of 389 patients, 299 patients were included, with a median age of 83 years, and 81% female. Thirty-two (10.7%) suffered a refracture, with a mean time to refracture of 19.8 ± 14.80 months, being the female sex a risk factor for refracture (OR-4.69; CI [1.05-20.95]). The 1-year mortality rate was 15.4%. Seventy-three (24.4%) patients had previous fragility fractures. After the index fracture, 79% remained untreated for osteoporosis. No statistical association was found between antiosteoporotic treatment and refracture. Patients with refracture had higher prefracture functional level compared with patients without refracture (OR-1.33; CI [1.08-1.63]) and were discharged more often to rehabilitation units (31% versus 16%, P =.028). After 4 years of follow-up, patients with refracture had lower functional level compared with patients without. Chronic kidney disease was a risk factor (P = .029) for early refracture (<24 months).

Conclusion

Female sex and higher prefracture functional level may increase the risk of refracture. Chronic kidney disease was associated with a shorter refracture time. Despite having a PFFF or other fragility fractures, the majority of patients remained untreated for osteoporosis.

Executive summary: Italian guidelines for diagnosis, risk stratification, and care continuity of fragility fractures 2021

Background

Fragility fractures are a major public health concern owing to their worrying and growing burden and their onerous burden upon health systems. There is now a substantial body of evidence that individuals who have already suffered a fragility fracture are at a greater risk for further fractures, thus suggesting the potential for secondary prevention in this field.

Purpose

This guideline aims to provide evidence-based recommendations for recognizing, stratifying the risk, treating, and managing patients with fragility fracture. This is a summary version of the full Italian guideline.

Methods

The Italian Fragility Fracture Team appointed by the Italian National Health Institute was employed from January 2020 to February 2021 to (i) identify previously published systematic reviews and guidelines on the field, (ii) formulate relevant clinical questions, (iii) systematically review literature and summarize evidence, (iv) draft the Evidence to Decision Framework, and (v) formulate recommendations.

Results

Overall, 351 original papers were included in our systematic review to answer six clinical questions. Recommendations were categorized into issues concerning (i) frailty recognition as the cause of bone fracture, (ii) (re)fracture risk assessment, for prioritizing interventions, and (iii) treatment and management of patients experiencing fragility fractures. Six recommendations were overall developed, of which one, four, and one were of high, moderate, and low quality, respectively.

Conclusions

The current guidelines provide guidance to support individualized management of patients experiencing non-traumatic bone fracture to benefit from secondary prevention of (re)fracture. Although our recommendations are based on the best available evidence, questionable quality evidence is still available for some relevant clinical questions, so future research has the potential to reduce uncertainty about the effects of intervention and the reasons for doing so at a reasonable cost.

The imminent risk of a fracture-existing worldwide data: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The overall incidence of imminent fracture after a prior fragility fracture was 7.58% in the first year and 11.58% in the first 2 years. Approximately half of re-fractures occurred in the first 2 years after a fragility fracture. Older patients that have suffered from a fragility fracture should be treated promptly, with immediate care and a secondary fracture prevention to prevent the high imminent risk of a fracture.

INTRODUCTION

Imminent fractures refer to the fractures that occur within 2 years of an initial fracture. It is well known that the risk of a subsequent fracture is not constant with time and occurs shortly after the initial one. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to present the existing data on imminent fracture worldwide.

METHODS

Literature search was conducted in Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science databases until 26 October 2021 for studies reporting the incidence of imminent osteoporotic fractures among people aged 50 years or older. The overall incidence of imminent fracture was pooled and subgroup analyses of index fracture sites and regions on incidence of imminent fracture were performed, with the 95% confidence interval (CI) being calculated. Percentage of imminent fracture occurring in follow-up period was calculated and pooled by meta-analysis. Hazard ratio (HR) was used to estimate the gender differences on the imminent risk of fracture.

RESULTS

A total of 1446 articles were identified. Nineteen observational studies were eligible for our systematic review, in which 18 were used for quantitative analysis. Pooled overall incidence of imminent fracture in the first year after an osteoporotic fracture was 7.58% (95% CI 5.84 to 9.31%) and cumulative incidence in the first 2 years was 11.58% (95% CI 8.94 to 14.21%). Subgroup analysis showed that in the first 2 years, the pooled incidence in Asia was 7.30% (95% CI 3.42 to 11.18%), whilst incidence in Europe/North America was 13.17% (95% CI 10.14 to 16.20%). In included studies with follow-up period of more than 5 years, pooled imminent fracture percentage in the first 2 years was 47.24% (95% CI 26.18 to 68.30%). Hazard ratio (HR) on gender showed that women had an overall slight increase in risk of imminent fractures (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.25).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of imminent fracture is high globally at 11.58%. Approximately half of all refractures occur in the first 2 years after an index fragility fracture. Older patients that have suffered from a fragility fracture should be treated promptly. Also, immediate care and secondary fracture prevention are necessary to prevent the high imminent risk of a fracture, especially within the first 2 years.

Spanish National Registry of Major Osteoporotic Fractures (REFRA) seen at Fracture Liaison Services (FLS): objectives and quality standards

REFRA-FLS is a new registry in Spain aimed at identifying individuals over 50 years of age with a fragility fracture. Using this registry, we found hip fracture is the most prevalent fracture. Treatment for osteoporosis was 87.7%, with 65.3% adherence. REFRA-FLS provides fundamental data in the study of fragility fractures.

PURPOSE

Fragility fractures are a growing public health concern in modern-aged societies. Fracture Liaison Services (FLS) have been shown to successfully lower rates of secondary fractures. A new registry (REFRA-FLS) has been created to monitor quality indicators of FLS units in Spain and to explore the occurrence and characteristic of fragility fractures identified by these centers.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study based on fragility fractures recorded in the REFRA-FLS registry. Participants were individuals 50 years or above who suffered a low energy fragility fracture identified by the 10 participating FLS units during the study period. The type of FLS unit, the characteristics of the individuals at baseline, along with patient outcomes as quality indicators among those who completed 1 year of follow-up were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 2965 patients and 3067 fragility fractures were identified, and the most frequent locations were hip (n = 1709, 55.7%) and spine (n = 492, 16.0%). A total of 43 refractures (4.5%) and 46 deaths (4.9%) were observed among 948 individuals in the follow-up analyses. Time from fracture to evaluation was less than 3 months in 76.7% of individuals. Osteoporosis treatment was prescribed in 87.7%, and adherence was 65.3% in Morisky-Green test.

CONCLUSION

Our results provide a comprehensive picture of fragility fractures identified in FLS units from Spain. Overall, quality indicators are satisfactory although a much higher use of DXA would be desirable. As the registry grows with the incorporation of new FLS units and longer follow-up, incoming analyses will provide valuable insight.

Cluster analysis demonstrates co-existing sites of fragility fracture and associated comorbidities

We undertook cluster analysis in 11,003 patients who had sustained ≥ 1 fragility fracture, to find associations between fracture sites and comorbidities. We identified three distinct groups of fracture sites and four clusters of fractures and comorbidities. Knowledge of factors associated with fracture sites will aid prophylaxis in at-risk patients.

INTRODUCTION

Fragility fracture (FF) prevalence is increasing. Subsequent fractures lead to greater morbidity and mortality. Few data are available on the association between FF sites and comorbidities.

OBJECTIVES

1. Establish the most common sites of FF and clusters within patients. 2. Identify patterns of co-existing FF and associated comorbidities.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed clinical records of patients undergoing bone mineral density estimation at a district hospital in North-West England, 2004-2016, identifying those who had sustained ≥ 1 FF. Demographics, FF site(s), comorbidities, and medications were recorded. Cluster analysis was performed on fracture sites alone, and sites and comorbidities, using Jaccard similarity coefficient. Results were plotted on a dendrogram and divided into clusters.

RESULTS

Of 28,868 patients, 11,003 had sustained ≥ 1 FF, 84.6% female, with overall mean age 67.5 years and median T-score - 1.12 SD. FF of the forearm was more frequent (n = 5045), most commonly co-existing with tibia/fibula fractures. Three FF site clusters were identified: ankle and elbow; forearm, tibia/fibula, ribs and spine; and pelvis, femur and humerus. When including comorbidities, four clusters were identified: forearm, tibia/fibula, spine, associated with family history of FF, smoking, corticosteroids and bisphosphonates; pelvis associated with hyperparathyroidism, PMR, coeliac disease and HRT; femur and humerus associated with IBD and RA; and ribs associated with alcohol and hyperthyroidism.

CONCLUSION

Cluster analysis demonstrated three fracture site clusters, and four subgroups of FF sites and comorbidities. Cluster analysis is a novel method to evaluate comorbidities associated with FF sites. Knowledge of factors associated with FF sites will aid prophylaxis in at-risk patients.

Fracture liaison services in Ireland-how do we compare to international standards?

In this first na tional survey of public hospitals in The Republic of Ireland, we found fracture liaison services (FLS) to be heterogeneous, limited in many cases and poorly supported. A national strategy is urgently needed to support the implementation and operation of an FLS, and thus help reduce the burden of fragility fractures for patients and the healthcare system.

INTRODUCTION

Fragility/low-trauma fractures are a global concern, whose incidence is rising as the population ages. Many are preventable, and people with a prior fragility fracture are at particularly high risk of further fractures. This patient group is the target of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) Capture the Fracture campaign, advocating global adoption of fracture liaison services (FLS), with the aim of preventing secondary fragility fractures. We wished to determine the current availability and standards of an FLS in Ireland, ahead of the launch of a National FLS database.

METHODS

We devised a questionnaire encompassing the thirteen IOF standards for an FLS and asked all 16 public hospitals with an orthopaedic trauma unit in Ireland, to complete for the calendar year 2019 in patients aged ≥ 50 years.

RESULTS

All sites returned the questionnaire, i.e. 100% response rate. Nine hospitals stated that they have an FLS, additionally one non-trauma hospital running a FLS responded, and were included. These 10 FLS had identified and managed 3444 non-hip fractures in the year 2019. This figure represents 19% of the expected non-hip fragility fracture numbers occurring annually in Ireland. Implementation of the IOF standards was very variable. All sites reported being inadequately resourced to provide a high-quality service necessary to be effective.

CONCLUSION

The existence and functioning of FLS in Ireland are heterogeneous and suboptimal. A national policy to support the implementation of this programme in line with international standards of patient care is urgently needed.

Incidence of different types of subsequent fractures and related mortality in Taiwan

Hip fracture is the most common type of fracture to occur within 2 years after an initial fracture. Mortality risk increases when a subsequent fracture occurs. The occurrence of subsequent fracture is significantly higher in patients with hip fractures than others. Prevention of subsequent fracture is of paramount important.

PURPOSE

Osteoporotic fracture significantly increases risk of subsequent fracture. In this retrospective cohort study, we used the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database (NHIRD) to analyze data on fractures in a group at high risk of osteoporosis. We aimed to distinguish differences in subsequent fracture types and their relationship with mortality.

METHODS

We enrolled patients aged ≥ 50 years old who were diagnosed with an initial fracture classified as hip, vertebral, upper end of the humerus, or wrist. Data from 2 years of follow-up were analyzed. Risks of subsequent fracture events and mortality were calculated by Kaplan-Meier estimation and assessed with Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

We included 375,836 patients from the 2011-2015 NHIRD. Patients with initial hip fracture had the highest incidence of subsequent fracture at both 1- and 2-year follow-up (7.0% and 10.9%). Subsequent fractures occurred mainly at the hip. Conversely, other patients had a higher proportion of subsequent vertebral fracture. Patients with subsequent fracture classified as hip, vertebral, and upper end of the humerus had significantly higher cumulative mortality rates than that of patients who had no subsequent fracture, with adjusted hazard ratios of 1.64 (95% CI = 1.57-1.71, p < 0.01), 1.06 (95% CI = 1.00-1.12, p = 0.04), 1.31 (95% CI = 1.17-1.46, p < 0.01), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients who experienced an initial hip fracture are at greatest risk of subsequent fracture, most commonly the hip. Occurrence of subsequent fractures was associated with an increased mortality risk. Thus, there is a need for early intervention following initial hip fractures.

Predictors of Mortality and Refracture in Patients Older Than 65 Years With a Proximal Femur Fracture

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate potential predictors of subsequent fracture and increased mortality in a population 65 years or older who suffered a proximal femur fragility fracture.

METHODS

This was a longitudinal study that included patients with a proximal femur fragility fracture, referred from the Orthopedics Inpatient Department to the Rheumatology Department's Fracture Liaison Service, from March 2015 to March 2017.

RESULTS

Five hundred twenty-two patients were included, with a median age (IQR) of 84 years (interquartile range [IQR], 11 years), 79.7% (n = 416) female. Nine percent (n = 47) suffered a new fracture, with a median time to event of 298 days (IQR, 331 days). Cumulative probability without refracture at 12 months was 93% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90.2%-95.0%); 22.8% (n = 119) patients died, with median time to death of 126 days (IQR, 336 days). Cumulative survival probability at 12 months was 81.7 (95% CI, 77.9-84.8). Neurologic disease (hazard ratio [HR], 2.30; 95% CI, 0.97-5.50; p = 0.06) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR, 3.61; 95% CI, 1.20-10.9; p = 0.022) were both predictors of refracture. Age older than 80 years (HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 0.99-2.38; p = 0.052), higher degree of dependence (HR, 1.24;95% CI, 1.09-1.42; p = 0.001), male sex (HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.03-2.33; p = 0.034), femoral neck fracture (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.24-0.88; p = 0.018), Charlson score (HR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.17-3.69; p = 0.012), heart failure (HR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.06-5.63; p = 0.037), hip bone mass density (HR, 3.99; 95% CI, 1.19-13.4; p = 0.025), hip T score (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.44-0.93; p = 0.021), and β-crosslaps (HR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.02-3.84; p = 0.042) all predicted a higher mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Neurologic disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease may increase the risk of subsequent fracture after a hip fracture. Male sex, age, autonomy degree, femur bone mass density/T score, fracture type, Charlson score, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, and β-crosslaps had significant impact on survival. The authors highlight β-crosslaps as a potential serological marker of increased mortality in clinical practice.

Cortical bone thickness of the distal radius predicts the local bone mineral density

AIMS

The distal radius is a major site of osteoporotic bone loss resulting in a high risk of fragility fracture. This study evaluated the capability of a cortical index (CI) at the distal radius to predict the local bone mineral density (BMD).

METHODS

A total of 54 human cadaver forearms (ten singles, 22 pairs) (19 to 90 years) were systematically assessed by clinical radiograph (XR), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), CT, as well as high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT (HR-pQCT). Cortical bone thickness (CBT) of the distal radius was measured on XR and CT scans, and two cortical indices mean average (CBTavg) and gauge (CBTg) were determined. These cortical indices were compared to the BMD of the distal radius determined by DXA (areal BMD (aBMD)) and HR-pQCT (volumetric BMD (vBMD)). Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to compare the results and degree of reliability.

RESULTS

The CBT could accurately be determined on XRs and highly correlated to those determined on CT scans (r = 0.87 to 0.93). The CBTavg index of the XRs significantly correlated with the BMD measured by DXA (r = 0.78) and HR-pQCT (r = 0.63), as did the CBTg index with the DXA (r = 0.55) and HR-pQCT (r = 0.64) (all p < 0.001). A high correlation of the BMD and CBT was observed between paired specimens (r = 0.79 to 0.96). The intra- and inter-rater reliability was excellent (ICC 0.79 to 0.92).

CONCLUSION

The cortical index (CBTavg) at the distal radius shows a close correlation to the local BMD. It thus can serve as an initial screening tool to estimate the local bone quality if quantitative BMD measurements are unavailable, and enhance decision-making in acute settings on fracture management or further osteoporosis screening. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(12):820-829.

Anabolic treatments for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women

Antiresorptive agents are generally recommended as first-line treatment for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. These drugs suppress bone resorption but do not rebuild bone, limiting their efficacy. Antiresorptive use is further hampered by concerns over rare side effects, including atypical femoral fractures and osteonecrosis of the jaw. Anabolic treatments overcome limitations of antiresorptive treatment by stimulating new bone formation, reducing the risk of fracture with greater efficacy. This review summarises the latest trial data for the three anabolic agents currently available for the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: teriparatide, abaloparatide, and romosozumab. Data from head-to-head studies comparing anabolic and antiresorptive treatments are reviewed. At present, anabolic treatments are generally reserved for use in patients with severe osteoporosis at very high fracture risk; the factors limiting their more widespread use are discussed together with how this may change in the future.

Osteoporosis epidemiology using international cohorts

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The field of osteoporosis research has been active for the past 20 years and has allowed significant advancement in the management of osteoporosis. This review will give an overview of the latest data from international cohorts that relate to current and recent osteoporosis research.

RECENT FINDINGS

The clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis relies heavily on bone mineral density (BMD) measured at femoral neck or spine and although BMD has excellent predictive value for future fractures, fracture risk assessment has evolved over the years, resulting in the birth of fracture prediction tools. Fracture risk factors not currently featured in these tools are being considered for inclusion, including imminent risk fracture following a sentinel fracture, number of falls, and previous vertebral fractures. Data from groups with comorbidities such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are helping us understand how to best manage patients with multiple comorbidities. Finally, the prevalence of vertebral fracture in the older general population and other selected populations has been explored, alongside the global burden of osteoporosis and its consequences.

SUMMARY

Our understanding of osteoporosis continues to expand, but knowledge gaps remain.

Effectiveness of a Japanese multi-professional cooperative osteoporosis liaison service at a private hospital for decreasing secondary fractures in osteoporosis patients with fragility fractures

PURPOSE

A fracture liaison service (FLS) was established in England to support patients with fragility fractures, and it was introduced in Japan as the osteoporosis liaison service (OLS). The study aim was to determine if the Japanese OLS/FLS prevents secondary fractures in patients with fragility fractures and assess the value of the OLS/FLS. Our OLS/FLS evaluated the status of osteoporosis in patients and their life circumstances. Additionally, it introduced osteoporosis therapies during the patients' hospitalization period and then continued periodical examinations and prescription of drug after discharge.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study was conducted in consecutive patients: 400 were assigned to the non-OLS group and 406 to the OLS group. The mean age of the patients was 81.7 ± 9.7 years in the non-OLS group (154 patients with vertebral fractures and 246 with hip fractures; 100 males, 300 females) and 82.4 ± 9.3 years in the OLS group (245 patients with hip fractures and 161 with vertebral fractures; 101 males, 305 females).

RESULTS

During hospitalization, 74.9% of the OLS group patients started medications and 63.9% of patients continued after discharge, while 35.8% and 53.5% of non-OLS group. The incidence rate of secondary fractures was 89.8/1000 person-years in the non-OLS group, and 55.2/1000 person-years in the OLS group. The multivariate Cox hazards test showed that secondary fractures after vertebral or hip fractures increased with age, and the risk was 0.58-fold in patients in the OLS group.

CONCLUSION

OLS was effective in reducing secondary fractures in patients with osteoporosis with fragility fractures.

Fragility Fractures and Imminent Fracture Risk in the Spanish Population: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study

Fragility fractures constitute a major public health problem worldwide, causing important high morbidity and mortality rates. The aim was to present the epidemiology of fragility fractures and to assess the imminent risk of a subsequent fracture and mortality. This is a retrospective population-based cohort study (n = 1369) with a fragility fracture. We estimated the incidence rate of index fragility fractures and obtained information on the subsequent fractures and death during a follow-up of up to three years. We assessed the effect of age, sex, and skeletal site of index fracture as independent risk factors of further fractures and mortality. Incidence rate of index fragility fractures was 86.9/10,000 person-years, with highest rates for hip fractures in women aged ≥80 years. The risk of fracture was higher in subjects with a recent fracture (Relative Risk(RR), 1.80; p < 0.01). Higher age was an independent risk factor for further fracture events. Significant excess mortality was found in subjects aged ≥80 years and with a previous hip fracture (hazard ratio, 3.43 and 2.48, respectively). It is the first study in Spain to evaluate the incidence of major osteoporotic fractures, not only of the hip, and the rate of imminent fracture. Our results provide further evidence highlighting the need for early treatment.

The Value of Historical Height Loss for Detecting Vertebral Fractures in Postmenopausal Women in China

OBJECTIVES

The diagnosis and management of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures are challenging in rural and underdeveloped areas of China because medical resources are inaccessible; thus, a simple and accurate method is essential for the detection of vertebral fractures. We aimed to examine the relationship between historical height loss (HHL) and vertebral fractures in postmenopausal Chinese women.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study of 255 postmenopausal women aged 50 years or older was conducted in September 2017. Demographic data, including self-reported tallest historical height and current height were analyzed. Vertebral fractures were assessed using X-ray radiography and HHL thresholds were examined using specificity and sensitivity testing.

RESULTS

The average age of the 255 participants was 66.3 ± 9.0 years and their mean HHL was 3.5 ± 2.8 cm. The 24 women who were found to have vertebral fractures were older, had more years since menopause (YSM), and a larger HHL compared to those without vertebral fractures. Logistic regression analysis showed that age was a better predictor of vertebral fractures than HHL was, and the cutoff age for detecting vertebral fractures was 71 years, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.750.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the women in this study with vertebral fractures had a greater height loss than those without fractures, it was apparent that age, rather than HHL, is the best way to determine who is most likely to develop vertebral fractures.

Osteoporosis in older adults

The incidence of fragility fractures increases progressively with advance in age after 50 years, and the phenomenon of population ageing will lead to an increased proportion of the world population having osteoporosis and fractures. The consequences of fractures are more serious in older adults: all low-trauma fractures were associated with increased mortality risk and the risk of a second major osteoporotic fracture after a first one also increased with advance in age. Along with the decrease in bone mineral density, falls play an essential role in the occurrence of fragility fractures in older adults, and the assessment of the risk of falling is part of the fracture risk assessment. Despite advances in the diagnosis of osteoporosis, the assessment of fracture risk, and a wide range of effective anti-osteoporosis medications, with parenteral route which can improve observance, many data indicate that the therapeutic care gap is particularly wide in the elderly in whom the importance and impact of a treatment are high and even more in those living in institutions.