Approaches to Fracture Risk Assessment and Prevention

2024 Royal Australian College of General Practitioners and Healthy Bones Australia guideline for osteoporosis management and fracture prevention in postmenopausal women and men over 50 years of age

INTRODUCTION

This updated guideline replaces the previous Royal Australian College of General Practitioners and Osteoporosis Australia (now, Healthy Bones Australia) guideline from 2017. The accumulation of high quality evidence supporting improvements in clinical practice over the past five years, need for expert consensus and opinion, and new developments in pharmacological management of osteoporosis, especially the role of osteoanabolic therapies, prompted this update. The aim was to provide clear, evidence-based recommendations to assist Australian general practitioners in managing patients over 50 years of age with poor bone health. However, it is useful for any health care professional caring for people with poor bone health and for health administrators and bureaucrats responsible for resource provision and allocation.

MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS

Earlier recognition of poor bone health using clinical risk factors, and use of an absolute fracture risk assessment tool, particularly FRAX (https://fraxplus.org/), is encouraged. Widespread population-based osteoporosis screening is not recommended in Australia due to lack of supporting evidence. It is important to recognise patients with "imminent" or "very high" fracture risk, as this is a group in whom to consider early osteoanabolic therapy. Calcium and vitamin D supplementation are more effective in reducing fracture risk when given to individuals who have calcium and vitamin D deficiency (not to healthy non-institutionalised individuals). CHANGES IN ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT AS A RESULT OF THE GUIDELINE: This guideline provides recommendations for the use of fracture risk assessment tools, particularly FRAX, for risk stratification, addresses the risk of rebound vertebral fracture following denosumab cessation, discusses removal of strontium as a therapy, clarifies "imminent" or "very high" fracture risk in patients and highlights the importance of calcium and vitamin D status, and the early use of osteoanabolic therapies. The full guideline is freely available at https://www.racgp.org.au/clinical-resources/clinical-guidelines/key-racgp-guidelines/view-all-racgp-guidelines/osteoporosis/executive-summary.

Construction of Mg2+ loaded multifunctional casein phosphopeptide/alendronate sodium antioxidative coating for repairing osteoporotic fracture

Owning to seriously impaired capacity of bone regeneration, the repair of osteoporotic bone defect remains a major clinical challenge in orthopedics. For titanium mesh scaffolds of skull repair, to construct bio-coatings targeting the pathological environment of osteoporosis is significant. Here, tannic acid (TA)/casein phosphopeptide (CPP) based layer-by-layer (LBL) self-assembled coating that loaded with anti-osteoporotic alendronate sodium (AS) and bioactive Mg2+ were prepared. The TA/CPP based LBL coatings showed good antioxidative function to effectively clear ABTS+• free radicals (scavenging rate of 64.29 ± 20.21 %) and inhibited the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) under oxidative stress conditions. All the LBL coatings exhibited good blood compatibility, and promoted early adhesion of BMSCs without affecting cell proliferation. In particular, the (TA/CPP-AS NPs)4 + Mg2+coatings had both good alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity and in vitro osteogenic mineralization, and could effectively promote the migration of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). In 8-weeks in vivo implantation experiments of osteoporotic skull defects, AS and Mg2+ loaded LBL coating showed significant formation of new bone tissue. The study on the integrated system of antioxidative coating with bisphosphonates and active metal ions will serve as a promising strategy for osteoporotic bone defect repair.

The Fracture Phenotypes in Women and Men of 50 Years and Older with a Recent Clinical Fracture

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We review the literature about patients 50 years and older with a recent clinical fracture for the presence of skeletal and extra-skeletal risks, their perspectives of imminent subsequent fracture, falls, mortality, and other risks, and on the role of the fracture liaison service (FLS) for timely secondary fracture prevention.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients with a recent clinical fracture present with heterogeneous patterns of bone-, fall-, and comorbidity-related risks. Short-term perspectives include bone loss, increased risk of fractures, falls, and mortality, and a decrease in physical performance and quality of life. Combined evaluation of bone, fall risk, and the presence of associated comorbidities contributes to treatment strategies. Since fractures are related to interactions of bone-, fall-, and comorbidity-related risks, there is no one-single-discipline-fits-all approach but a need for a multidisciplinary approach at the FLS to consider all phenotypes for evaluation and treatment in an individual patient.

Family/caregiver influence on osteoporosis management for older people: an integrative review

An integrative literature review was conducted to understand family/caregiver influence on osteoporosis management for older people. Findings include caregivers' overprotection, caregivers' risks for fragility fractures due to caregiving role, poor bone health in caregivers, and caregivers' burden and facilitators. Caregivers should be included in bone health and discharge planning. Literature on family/caregiver influence on osteoporosis management for older people is sparse. Older people are prone to osteoporosis and fragility fractures due to their age, often triggering the need for a caregiver after experiencing a fragility fracture. These fractures pose significant costs to the patient and health systems and are projected to increase with the aging population. This study applied an integrative literature review methodology to key literature findings on family/caregiver influence on osteoporosis management for older people. Key findings include caregivers' tendency to overprotect persons who experience hip fracture by limiting mobilization, thus impeding recovery, caregivers' risks for their own fragility fractures due to the demands of their caregiving role, risks of poor bone health in caregivers, and caregivers' experience of significant burden for which facilitators have been identified. Family caregivers of older people with osteoporosis have unique needs and require support and resources, especially after their loved one experiences a hip fracture. Informal caregivers must be considered in bone health education and discharge planning. They should be considered in the creation of osteoporosis guidelines and within the work of fracture liaison services. More research is needed to increase understanding about family caregiver influence on osteoporosis management.

The Association of nutritional status and physical activity on osteoporotic refractures among older adults

BACKGROUND

This paper focuses on revealing the relationship between the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) and Activity of Daily Living (ADL) with osteoporotic refracture.

METHODS

Data from 1068 inpatients with osteoporotic fractures were analyzed. Binary logistic regression, Cox proportional hazard regression and Kaplan-Meier curves were performed for osteoporosis characteristics and its risk factors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was developed to predict the cut-off value.

RESULTS

The study showed that older age, lower ADL and lower GNRI were independent risk factors for osteoporotic fracture with OR of 1.039, 0.946, 0.892 and HR of 1.033, 0.967, 0.947 respectively. According to the results of ROC, the predictive accuracy of GNRI was high with an area under ROC (AUC) of 0.715, sensitivity of 76.6%, specificity of 53.5% and a threshold value of 99.65.

CONCLUSION

Older age, lower ADL and lower GNRI were independent risk factors for osteoporotic refracture.

Difficulties in decision making on a long standing, complicated case of osteoporosis – a real challenge for functional rehabilitation

We aim was to present a case of severe osteoporosis with concern to an adult female who was under specific medication against the condition while she experienced inexplicable weight loss in association with an incidental fracture inconsistent with DXA changes. Challenges of the case management and decision making are further on explained. Real-life-medicine poses multiple issues that require an individual decision while respecting the standard protocols. That is why a generalized decision is rather impractical. Here we introduce the clinical case of a lady in her late 60s with a known 6-year history of osteoporosis that required several difficult decisions along surveillance: at first, zoledronic acid represented an available solution, yet after one year, BMD decreased and adjustment was done by initiating a second sequence according to the teriparatide protocol. DXA-BMD, as well as the spectrum of bone turnover markers, qualified the patient as responsive and she further continued with oral bisphosphonates while being monitored via telemedicine amid COVID-19 pandemic. After 24 more months, a second decision of zoledronic acid was done, despite prior partial response, but digestive complains restricted the oral administration of anti-osteoporotic drugs. After one more year, denosumab was initiated and consecutive follow-up is essential. At this point, another challenging aspect was revealed: the discordance between DXA – based scores increase and the presence of an incidental fracture. A supplementary investigation was considered useful (Tc- whole body scintigraphy) noting the clinical presentation with local pain, dysfunctionality, and mild weight loss that also required rehabilitation management.

The Effect of Denosumab in Elderly Patients Regarding Bone Density and Fracture Risk

BACKGROUND

With an aging population, the importance of treating and diagnosing osteoporosis is increasing. Osteoporosis, previously known as a resorptive change primarily related to endocrinological mechanisms, is also being approached as a phenomenon of senile change. Denosumab is gaining popularity among osteoporosis medications due to its ability to increase bone mineral density (BMD) and the economic benefit arising from the 6-month cycle. In line with previous literature, this study aimed to examine the BMD-augmenting effect of denosumab through which it reduces fracture risk in individuals aged over 80 years.

METHODS

We reviewed patients who received denosumab between 2018 and 2022 with a minimum clinical observation period of 12 months. BMD was measured every 12 months, and patients were classified per their period of denosumab use. Fracture risk was evaluated using the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) and fracture incidence during the observation period were assessed.

RESULTS

Among 155 patients, a significant increase in BMD was observed at 3 sites: the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip (p<0.001, p<0.001, and p=0.001, respectively). The patients were divided according to the length of clinical follow-up they received, and similar results were found in all subgroups. Fracture risk assessment was performed using FRAX and the incidence of fracture events during follow-up. FRAX significantly decreased in all subgroups except those who received 24 months of follow-up (p=0.003, p=0.41, p=0.001 in the 12, 24, and ≥36 months groups, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Denosumab use resulted in long-term BMD increase and reduced fracture risk in individuals aged 80 and above.

Beyond vision:Cataract and health status in old age, a narrative review

Cataract is a leading cause of visual impairment in old age. Lens opacification is notoriously associated with several geriatric conditions, including frailty, fall risk, depression and cognitive impairment. The association is largely attributable to visual impairment, while other mechanisms, associated with extraocular comorbidity and lifestyle, might partly explain this correlation. Available literature suggests that cataract surgery may be effective in decreasing fall risk, improving depressive symptoms and limiting the risk of cognitive impairment and dementia incidence, although intervention studies on these outcomes are still limited. In this review we also emphasize the need to move from the concept of visual acuity to functional vision, especially in the context of the geriatric patient. Research is needed regarding the effect on the cited outcomes of different cataract treatment strategies, such as systematic bilateral versus monolateral surgery and use of different intraocular lenses.

How to implement guidelines and models of care

In subjects older than 50 years, the presence of clinical risk factors (CRFs) for fractures or a recent fracture is the cornerstone for case finding. In patients who are clinically at high short- and long-term risk of fractures (those with a recent clinical fracture or with multiple CRFs), further assessment with bone mineral density (BMD) measurement using dual-energy absorptiometry (DXA), imaging of the spine, fall risk evaluation and laboratory examination contributes to treatment decisions according to the height and modifiability of fracture risk. Treatment is available with anti-resorptive and anabolic drugs, and from the start of treatment a lifelong strategy is needed to decide about continuous, intermittent, and sequential therapy. Implementation of guidelines requires further initiatives for improving case finding, public awareness about osteoporosis and national policies on reimbursement of assessment and therapy.

Evaluating the performance of the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) in fracture risk prediction and developing a new Charlson Fracture Index (CFI): a register-based cohort study

The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) may be applicable for predicting fracture risk since several diagnoses from the index are predictors of fracture. Main results were that the CCI was updated to predict risk of hip fracture with fair precision and that the index could be useful in detecting high-risk individuals.

PURPOSE

Several of the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) diagnoses are validated predictors of fracture. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the CCI 1987 by Charlson et al. and of the CCI 2011 by Quan et al. in predicting major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture (HF). Furthermore, it was examined whether the index could be modified to improve fracture risk prediction.

METHODS

The study population included the entire Danish population aged 45 + years as per January 1, 2018. The cohort was split randomly 50/50 into a development and a validation cohort. CCI diagnoses and fracture outcomes were identified from hospital diagnoses. The weighting of diagnoses was updated in a new Charlson Fracture Index (CFI) using multivariable logistic regression. Predictive capabilities of the CCI 1987, the updated CCI 2011 and the new Charlson Fracture index were evaluated in the validation cohort by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

In the validation cohort, the 1987 and 2011 CCIs resulted in AUCs below or around 0.7 in prediction of MOF and HF in both sexes. The CFI resulted in AUCs < 0.7 in prediction of MOF in both sexes. In prediction of HF, the CFI resulted in AUC of 0.755 (95% CI 0.749; 0.761) in women and 0.782 (95% CI 0.772; 0.793) in men.

CONCLUSION

The 1987 and 2011 CCIs showed overall poor accuracy in fracture risk prediction. The CFI showed fair accuracy in prediction of HF in women and in men.