Orexin Receptor Antagonists and Insomnia

Comparison of efficacy and safety of dual orexin receptor antagonists lemborexant and daridorexant for the treatment of insomnia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of lemborexant (LEM) and daridorexant (DAR) for the treatment of insomnia, including the difference in efficacy and safety.

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of LEM and DAR in patients with insomnia in five databases from database inception to Mar 16, 2024. We evaluate the quality of studies. Besides, we perform the meta-analysis and detect publication bias.

RESULTS

A total of 8 RCTs with 5077 patients were included in this study, including 2239 in the LEM treatment group, 1397 in the DAR treatment group, and 1441 in the placebo (PBO) control group. Both LEM and DAR significantly improved sleep outcomes compared to placebo. LEM was more effective in reducing the time of wake after sleep onset (WASO) (MD, -45.15; 95% CI: -51.75 to -38.56; P < 0.001) and improving subjective sleep onset latency (sSOL) (MD, -25.01; 95% CI: -28.58 to -21.44; P < 0.001) than DAR (WASO: MD: -12.6; 95% CI: -18.71 to -6.5; P < 0.001; sSOL: MD, -2.33; 95% CI: -7.1 to 2.45; P = 0.24). In terms of dosing, DAR at 50 mg demonstrated superior efficacy compared to the 5 mg, 10 mg, and 25 mg doses, indicating a dose-dependent effect. The efficacy of LEM was consistent across the 5 mg and 10 mg doses. Safety profiles revealed that DAR (RR, 1.16; 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.29; P = 0.01) treatment was associated with higher rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) compared to placebo, particularly at the 25 mg dose (RR, 1.15; 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.31; P = 0.03), while LEM (RR, 1.21; 95% CI: 0.98 to 1.50; P = 0.08) showed no significant difference in TEAEs rates compared to placebo. However, LEM (RR, 5.62; 95% CI: 2.92 to 10.83; P < 0.001) was associated with a higher risk of somnolence compared to DAR (RR, 1.55; 95% CI: 0.86 to 2.81; P = 0.15). The overall quality of the included studies was moderate to high based on the risk of bias assessment.

CONCLUSION

Both LEM and DAR are effective and generally safe options for the treatment of insomnia, with LEM showing greater efficacy in improving WASO and sSOL. The choice between LEM and DAR should consider individual patient needs, including the risk of daytime drowsiness and other adverse events. Further direct comparative trials are needed to confirm these findings and inform clinical decision-making.

Pharmacological Monotherapy for Depressive Disorders: Current and Future-A Narrative Review

Objective: To narratively review currently available antidepressants and future potential antidepressants as monotherapy for the treatment of depressive disorders. Methods: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), dopamine reuptake inhibitor (bupropion), tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) were reviewed according to the results from Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) Study and systematic reviews. For the rest of the antidepressants, a PubMed/Medline search was conducted with priority for systematic reviews. For drugs in development for depressive disorders, PubMed, Google, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases were used. Results: The STAR*D Study demonstrated that sertraline, venlafaxine, and bupropion monotherapy had similar efficacy in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who failed citalopram. A network meta-analyses of randomized, placebo-controlled trials found that SSRIs, SNRIs, bupropion, TCAs, mirtazapine, and agomelatine had similar relative efficacy compared to placebo, but had different acceptability. Gepirone had more failed/negative studies and smaller effect size relative to placebo compared to other antidepressants. The combination of dextromethorphan and bupropion, ketamine infusion, and intranasal esketamine had faster onset of action but similar effect size compared to monoamine-based antidepressants as monotherapy. Brexanolone and zuranolone are effective in postpartum depression (PPD), but the effect size of zuranolone in MDD as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy was very small. Psychedelics, glutamate receptor-related agents, kappa opioid receptor antagonists, orexin receptor antagonists, new anti-inflammatory agents, and biomarker-based antidepressant therapy have been under investigation for depressive disorders. Psychedelics showed faster onset of action, large effect size, and long durability. Conclusions: Monoamine-based antidepressants likely continue to be the mainstream antidepressants for depressive disorder. NMDA receptor antagonists and neurosteroid antidepressants will play a bigger role with the improvement of accessibility. Psychedelics may become a game changer if phase III studies validate their efficacy and safety in depressive disorders.

Role of OX/OXR cascade in insomnia and sleep deprivation link Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease: Therapeutic avenue of Dual OXR Antagonist (DORA)

Sleep plays a role in the elimination of neurotoxic metabolites that are accumulated in the waking brain as a result of neuronal activity. Long-term insomnia and sleep deprivation are associated with oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, amyloid beta (Aβ) deposition, and Lewy body formation, which are known to increase the risk of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. Orexin A (OXA) and orexin B (OXB), two neuropeptides produced in the lateral hypothalamus, are known to influence the sleep-wake cycle and the stress responses through their interactions with OX receptor 1 (OX1R) and OX receptor 2 (OX2R), respectively. OX/OXR cascade demonstrates intricate neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory effects by inhibiting nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kB) and PLC/Ca2+ pathway activation. OX1R binds OXA more strongly than OXB by one-order ratio, whereas OX2R binds both OXA and OXB with equal strengths. Overexpression of OXs in individuals experiences sleep deprivation, circadian rhythm disturbances, insomnia-associated MCI, Parkinson's disease (PD), and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Many dual OXR antagonists (DORAs) have been effective in their clinical studies, with suvorexant and daridorexant receiving FDA clearance for insomnia therapy in 2014 and 2022 respectively. The results of clinical studies suggested that there is a new pharmaceutical option for treating insomnia and the sleep deprivation-AD/PD relationship by targeting the OXR system. DORAs treatment reduces Aβ deposition in the brain and improves synaptic plasticity and circadian expression. This review indicates the link between sleep disorders and MCI, DORAs are an appropriate medication category for treating insomnia, and sleep deprivation links AD and PD.

Emerging medications and pharmacological treatment approaches for substance use disorders

Medications to treat substance use disorders (SUDs) remain suboptimal or, in the case of stimulants and cannabis, non-existent. Many factors have contributed to this paucity, including the biological complexity of addiction, regulatory challenges, and a historical lack of enthusiasm among pharmaceutical companies to commit resources to this disease space. Despite these headwinds, the recent opioid crisis has highlighted the devastating consequences of SUDs for both individuals and society, stimulating urgent efforts to identify novel treatment approaches. In addition, several neurobiological systems have been recently implicated in unique aspects of drug reward, opening the door to candidate medications with novel mechanisms of action. Here, we provide an overview of efforts to target several of these new systems, with a focus on those that are the subject of ongoing clinical trials as well as being areas of interest among the authors' research groups (MHJ, MTB, NAE). Specifically, we discuss new classes of medications targeting the serotonin 2A receptor (i.e., psychedelics), glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor, cannabidiol, dynorphin/kappa opioid receptor, orexin/hypocretin, and oxytocin receptor systems, as well as emergent approaches for modulating the more canonical dopaminergic system via agonist therapies for stimulant use disorders. Collectively, innovations in this space give reason for optimism for an improved therapeutic landscape for substance use disorders in the near future.

Pharmacological and psychological approaches to insomnia treatment in cardiac patients: a narrative literature review

Sleep disorders are highly prevalent in the general population and are considered a major public health issue. Insomnia constitutes the most frequent sleep disorder in healthy individuals and has been shown to be even more frequent in patients with physical illnesses including cardiovascular diseases. Inadequate sleep quality and short sleep duration, independent of underlying causes, have been linked to the development and progression of cardiometabolic disorders. Additionally, insomnia has been found to be associated with adverse outcome measures, including daytime sleepiness, fatigue, decreased self-reported physical functioning, lower exercise capacity, poor health related quality of life, depressive symptoms, higher rates of hospitalization and increased mortality in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Against this background, comparatively little information is available in the literature regarding the treatment of chronic insomnia in cardiac patient populations. While guidelines for the general population suggest cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia as a first-line treatment option and preliminary evidence suggests this treatment to be beneficial in cardiac patients with insomnia symptoms, it is often limited by availability and possibly the clinician's poor understanding of sleep issues in cardiac patients. Therefore, pharmacologic treatment remains an important option indicated by the high number of hypnotic drug prescriptions in the general population and in patients with cardiovascular disorders. In this narrative review of the literature, we summarize treatment options for chronic insomnia based on clinical guidelines for the general population and highlight necessary considerations for the treatment of patients with cardiovascular diseases.

The Aggravating Role of Failing Neuropeptide Networks in the Development of Sporadic Alzheimer's Disease

Alzheimer's disease imposes an increasing burden on aging Western societies. The disorder most frequently appears in its sporadic form, which can be caused by environmental and polygenic factors or monogenic conditions of incomplete penetrance. According to the authors, in the majority of cases, Alzheimer's disease represents an aggravated form of the natural aging of the central nervous system. It can be characterized by the decreased elimination of amyloid β1-42 and the concomitant accumulation of degradation-resistant amyloid plaques. In the present paper, the dysfunction of neuropeptide regulators, which contributes to the pathophysiologic acceleration of senile dementia, is reviewed. However, in the present review, exclusively those neuropeptides or neuropeptide families are scrutinized, and the authors' investigations into their physiologic and pathophysiologic activities have made significant contributions to the literature. Therefore, the pathophysiologic role of orexins, neuromedins, RFamides, corticotrope-releasing hormone family, growth hormone-releasing hormone, gonadotropin-releasing hormone, ghrelin, apelin, and natriuretic peptides are discussed in detail. Finally, the therapeutic potential of neuropeptide antagonists and agonists in the inhibition of disease progression is discussed here.

Bibliometric analysis of orexin: A promising neuropeptide

BACKGROUND

Orexin is an excitatory neuropeptide produced in the lateral hypothalamus, playing a role in various physiological functions in humans. There is a growing body of literature on orexins. This paper utilizes CiteSpace software to organize and analyze a significant number of articles on orexin, providing readers with an intuitive overview of research trends and emerging hot topics in this field.

METHODS

The electronic database, Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC), was searched for publications related to orexins. Annual publications, countries/regions, institutions, authors and keywords were analyzed, and the results were visualized via CiteSpace software.

RESULTS

A total of 5486 publications were included, with articles making up 85.30% and reviews 14.70%. The top 3 countries publishing the most papers on orexins were the United States (2057 papers), Japan (778), and China (556). The leading institutions included Research Libraries UK (278), Harvard University (250), and Stanford University (221). The most prolific authors in the field were Yves Dauvilliers (69), Abbas Haghparast (67), and Takeshi Sakurai (66). The most frequently used keywords were "neurons" (981), followed by "sleep" (824), "food intake" (612), "receptors" (547), and "neuropathology" (535). Recent research hotspots include melanin-concentrating hormone neurons, Alzheimer disease, gamma-aminobutyric acid neurons, oxidative stress, suvorexant, the orexin system, prevalence, and stress. Based on keyword clustering analysis, the top 5 research hotspots from 2003 to 2022 were: the effects of orexins on sleep and metabolism, potential pathways of orexin signaling, the relationship between orexin and immunity, new findings on depression and hypertension related to orexin, and possible targets for neurodegenerative diseases.

CONCLUSION

Orexin, a neuropeptide linked to various physiological and pathological processes, plays a crucial role in sleep/wakefulness, reward mechanisms, stress responses, and neurodegenerative diseases. Its significant research value and potential medical applications are underscored by the rapid expansion of studies, particularly in the USA and Japan. However, the lack of collaboration among researchers highlights the need for enhanced academic exchange and cooperation to further advance the field of orexin research.

Data mining and safety analysis of dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs): a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on the FAERS database

Objective

Using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, four signal detection methods were applied to mine adverse drug events (ADEs) related to use of dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) to provide reference for safe clinical use.

Research design and Methods

Data collected from Q3rd 2014 to Q4th 2023 were obtained from the FAERS database. According to the preferred terminology (PT) and systematic organ classification (SOC) of MedDRA v.26.0, the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS), and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) were used to detect ADE signals.

Results

A total of 11,857 DORAs-related adverse reactions were detected, reported with suvorexant, lemborexant, and daridorexant as the main suspected drugs was 8717584, and 2556, respectively. A higher proportion of females than males were reported (57.27% vs. 33.04%). The top 20 positive PT signals from three DORAs showed that "sleep paralysis" ranked first. "Brain fog" was stronger following daridorexant but was not detected for the other two drugs, and "sleep sex" and "dyssomnia" were stronger in suvorexant but not in the other two drugs. Additionally, some PTs occurred that were not included in drug instructions, such as "hangover" and "hypnagogic hallucination."

Conclusion

In this study, four algorithms (ROR, PRR, BCPNN, and MGPS) were used to mine the safety signals of DORAs. We identified some potential ADE signals that can promote the rational use of DORAs and improve their safety.

The Triad of Sleep, Immunity, and Cancer: A Mediating Perspective

The triadic interplay between sleep, immunity, and cancer represents a growing area of biomedical research with significant clinical implications. This review synthesizes the current knowledge on how sleep influences immune function, the immune system's role in cancer dynamics, and the direct connections between sleep patterns and cancer risk. After a comprehensive overview of the interrelationships among these three domains, the mechanisms of sleep in immune function are described, detailing how sleep regulates the immune system, the effects of sleep duration and quality on immune responses, and the underlying molecular and cellular mechanisms. Also, the complex relationship between immunity and cancer is explored, highlighting the immune system's role in cancer prevention and progression, immune surveillance, tumor microenvironment, and the implications of immunodeficiency and immune modulation on cancer risk. The direct connections between sleep and cancer are then described, presenting epidemiological evidence linking sleep patterns to cancer risk, biological mechanisms that influence cancer development, and the role of sleep disorders in cancer prognosis. The mediating role of sleep between immunity and cancer is highlighted, proposing hypothesized pathways, summarizing evidence from experimental and clinical studies, and evaluating the impact of sleep interventions on immune function and cancer outcomes. This review concludes by discussing the clinical implications and future directions, emphasizing the potential for sleep-based interventions in cancer prevention and treatment, the integration of sleep management in oncology and immunotherapy, and outlining a future research agenda. This agenda includes understanding the mechanisms of the sleep-immunity-cancer interplay, conducting epidemiological studies on sleep and cancer risk, assessing the impact of sleep management in cancer treatment protocols, exploring sleep and tumor microenvironment interactions, and considering policy and public health implications. Through a detailed examination of these interconnected pathways, this review underscores the critical importance of sleep in modulating immune function and cancer outcomes, advocating for interdisciplinary research and clinical strategies to harness this knowledge for improved health outcomes.

Effects of methamphetamine on actigraphy-based sleep parameters in female rhesus monkeys: Orexin receptor mechanisms

BACKGROUND

The orexin system has been implicated as a mechanism underlying insomnia and methamphetamine-induced sleep disruptions, with a potential role for OX2 receptors in the sleep-modulating effects of orexin. The aim of the present study was to investigate the extent to which orexin receptors mediate the effects of acute methamphetamine administration on actigraphy-based sleep in female rhesus monkeys.

METHODS

Actigraphy-based sleep measures were obtained in female rhesus monkeys (n=5) under baseline and acute test conditions. First, morning (10h) i.m. injections of methamphetamine (0.03 - 0.56mg/kg) were administered to determine the effects of methamphetamine alone. Then, saline or methamphetamine (0.3mg/kg) were administered at 10h, and evening (17h30) oral treatments with vehicle, the non-selective orexin receptor antagonist suvorexant (1 - 10mg/kg, p.o.), or the OX2-selective orexin receptor antagonist MK-1064 (1 - 10mg/kg, p.o.) were given. The ability of suvorexant and MK-1064 (10mg/kg, p.o.) to improve actigraphy-based sleep was also assessed in a group of female monkeys quantitatively identified with "short-duration sleep" (n=4).

RESULTS

Methamphetamine dose-dependently disrupted actigraphy-based sleep parameters. Treatment with either suvorexant or MK-1064 dose-dependently improved actigraphy-based sleep in monkeys treated with methamphetamine. Additionally, both suvorexant and MK-1064 promoted actigraphy-based sleep in a group of monkeys with baseline short actigraphy-based sleep.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that orexin-mediated mechanisms play a role in the effects of methamphetamine on actigraphy-based sleep in female monkeys. Targeting the orexin system, in particular OX2 receptors, could be an effective option for treating sleep disruptions observed in individuals with methamphetamine use disorder.

Acupuncture for primary insomnia: Effectiveness, safety, mechanisms and recommendations for clinical practice

Primary insomnia (PI) is an increasing concern in modern society. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia is the first-line recommendation, yet limited availability and cost impede its widespread use. While hypnotics are frequently used, balancing their benefits against the risk of adverse events poses challenges. This review summarizes the clinical and preclinical evidence of acupuncture as a treatment for PI, discussing its potential mechanisms and role in reliving insomnia. Clinical trials show that acupuncture improves subjective sleep quality, fatigue, cognitive impairments, and emotional symptoms with minimal adverse events. It also positively impacts objective sleep processes, including prolonging total sleep time, improving sleep efficiency, reducing sleep onset latency and wake after sleep onset, and enhancing sleep architecture/structure, including increasing N3% and REM%, and decreasing N1%. However, methodological shortcomings in some trials diminish the overall quality of evidence. Animal studies suggest that acupuncture restores circadian rhythms in sleep-deprived rodents and improves their performance in behavioral tests, possibly mediated by various clinical variables and pathways. These may involve neurotransmitters, brain-derived neurotrophic factors, inflammatory cytokines, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, gut microbiota, and other cellular events. While the existing findings support acupuncture as a promising therapeutic strategy for PI, additional high-quality trials are required to validate its benefits.

Clinical usefulness of dual orexin receptor antagonism beyond insomnia: Neurological and psychiatric comorbidities

Orexin is a neurotransmitter produced by a small group of hypothalamic neurons. Besides its well-known role in the regulation of the sleep-wake cycle, the orexin system was shown to be relevant in several physiological functions including cognition, mood and emotion modulation, and energy homeostasis. Indeed, the implication of orexin neurotransmission in neurological and psychiatric diseases has been hypothesized via a direct effect exerted by the projections of orexin neurons to several brain areas, and via an indirect effect through orexin-mediated modulation of sleep and wake. Along with the growing evidence concerning the use of dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) in the treatment of insomnia, studies assessing their efficacy in insomnia comorbid with psychiatric and neurological diseases have been set in order to investigate the potential impact of DORAs on both sleep-related symptoms and disease-specific manifestations. This narrative review aimed at summarizing the current evidence on the use of DORAs in neurological and psychiatric conditions comorbid with insomnia, also discussing the possible implication of modulating the orexin system for improving the burden of symptoms and the pathological mechanisms of these disorders. Target searches were performed on PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus databases and ongoing studies registered on Clinicaltrials.gov were reviewed. Despite some contradictory findings, preclinical studies seemingly support the possible beneficial role of orexin antagonism in the management of the most common neurological and psychiatric diseases with sleep-related comorbidities. However, clinical research is still limited and further studies are needed for corroborating these promising preliminary results.

Clinical safety and narcolepsy-like symptoms of dual orexin receptor antagonists in patients with insomnia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) are emerging treatments for insomnia. This meta-analysis study aimed to assess the safety of FDA-approved DORAs (suvorexant, lemborexant, and daridorexant), focusing on narcolepsy-like symptoms associated with these drugs.

METHODS

Five prominent databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on this topic. Primary safety outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), treatment-related TEAEs, TEAEs leading to discontinuation, and serious TEAEs. Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), sleep paralysis, and hallucinations were categorized as adverse events (AEs)-related narcolepsy-like symptoms.

RESULTS

Eleven RCTs with 7703 patients were included. DORAs were associated with a higher risk of TEAEs (risk ratio [RR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 1.15) and treatment-related TEAEs (RR, 1.69; 95% CI: 1.49 to 1.92) when compared to placebo. The DORA group exhibited a significantly higher risk of EDS (RR, 2.15; 95% CI: 1.02 to 4.52) and sleep paralysis (RR, 3.40; 95% CI: 1.18 to 9.80) compared to the placebo group.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis achieved a comparative evaluation of the clinical safety and tolerability of FDA-approved DORAs for primary insomnia, specifically focusing on AEs-related narcolepsy-like symptoms. This study contributes to understanding the safety profile of FDA-approved DORAs for treating insomnia.

Daridorexant: Comprehensive Review of A New Oral Agent for the Treatment of Insomnia

OBJECTIVE

To review the current pharmacology, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, safety, and efficacy of daridorexant in patients with insomnia.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search of PubMed (March 1, 2018, to October 19, 2022) and ClinicalTrials.gov search was conducted using the following terms: daridorexant and ACT-541468. Additional articles were identified by hand from references.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

We included English-language articles evaluating daridorexant pharmacology, efficacy, or safety in humans for the management of insomnia.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Daridorexant has a peak plasma concentration of 1-2 hours, terminal half-life of 8 hours, and absolute bioavailability of 61%. Wake after sleep onset (WASO) significantly decreased from baseline to months 1 and 3 in daridorexant 25 (-18.40 and -22.97 min, P < 0.0001) and 50 mg (-28.98 and -29.41 min, P < 0.0001) groups compared with placebo. Latency to persistent sleep (LPS) significantly decreased from baseline to months 1 and 3 for daridorexant 25 mg (-28.17 and -30.73 min, P = 0.0005 and P = 0.0015) and 50 mg (-31.20 and -34.80 min, P < 0.0001).

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE IN COMPARISON TO EXISTING AGENTS

Daridorexant can be administered in diverse patient populations because of its tolerability and favorable safety profile. However, due to the lack of large scale studies that directly compare dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs), there is not enough data to recommend 1 DORA over another.

CONCLUSIONS

Daridorexant is well tolerated and has demonstrated significant reductions in LPS and WASO in the treatment of insomnia in adult patients.

Different doses of dual orexin receptor antagonists in primary insomnia: a Bayesian network analysis

Background: Systematic comparisons of the doses of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) for people with insomnia are limited. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials. gov were systematically searched to identify relevant studies published before 31 October 2022. We assessed the certainty of evidence using the confidence in network meta-analysis (CINeMA) framework. Results: We pooled 7257 participants from 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Moderate to high certainty evidence demonstrated suvorexant (20 and 40 mg) and daridorexant (10 and 50 mg) as the most effective in latency to persistent sleep (LPS) reduction. Lemborexant at 5 and 10 mg was the most effective in subjective sleep onset time (sTSO) reduction. For wake time after sleep onset (WASO), all drugs except daridorexant 5 mg were more effective than placebo. Lemborexant 5 mg was among the best in subjective WASO (sWASO) (moderate to high certainty) and had the highest surface under the curve ranking area (SUCRA) values for sWASO (100%). For total sleep time (TST), suvorexant and daridorexant, except the respective minimum doses, were more effective than placebo, while suvorexant 40 mg and lemborexant 10 mg may have been the most effective for subjective TST (sTST) (low to very low certainty). Suvorexant 40 mg (RR 1.09), suvorexant 80 mg (RR 1.65), and daridorexant 25 mg (RR 1.16) showed a higher safety risk than placebo. Conclusion: Suvorexant 20 mg, lemborexant 5 mg, lemborexant 10 mg, and daridorexant 50 mg represent suitable approaches for insomnia. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, PROSPERO (CRD42022362655).