Management of Non-criteria Manifestations in Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Antiphospholipid antibody-related hepatic vasculitis in a juvenile after non-severe COVID-19: a case report and literature review

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are both laboratory evidence and causative factors for a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), with thrombotic and obstetric events being the most prevalent. Despite the aPL-triggered vasculopathy nature of APS, vasculitic-like manifestations rarely exist in APS and mainly appear associated with other concurrent connective tissue diseases like systemic lupus erythematous. Several studies have characterized pulmonary capillaritis related to pathogenic aPL, suggesting vasculitis as a potential associated non-thrombotic manifestation. Here, we describe a 15-year-old girl who develops hepatic infarction in the presence of highly positive aPL, temporally related to prior non-severe COVID-19 infection. aPL-related hepatic vasculitis, which has not been reported before, contributes to liver ischemic necrosis. Immunosuppression therapy brings about favorable outcomes. Our case together with retrieved literature provides supportive evidence for aPL-related vasculitis, extending the spectrum of vascular changes raised by pathogenic aPL. Differentiation between thrombotic and vasculitic forms of vascular lesions is essential for appropriate therapeutic decision to include additional immunosuppression therapy. We also perform a systematic review to characterize the prevalence and clinical features of new-onset APS and APS relapses after COVID-19 for the first time, indicating the pathogenicity of aPL in a subset of COVID-19 patients.

Anticoagulant and non-anticoagulant therapy in thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome: old drugs and new treatment targets

In this review, we discuss the current evidence on classic and newer oral anticoagulant therapy, older drugs such as HCQ and statins, and new potential treatment targets in APS. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) remain the cornerstone treatment for thrombotic events in APS. In patients fulfilling criteria for definite APS presenting with a first venous thrombosis, treatment with VKAs with a target international normalized ratio (INR) 2.0-3.0 is recommended. In patients with arterial thrombosis, treatment with VKA with target INR 2.0-3.0 or 3.0-4.0 is recommended by recent guidelines, considering the individual's bleeding and thrombosis recurrence risk. A combination of VKAs and low-dose aspirin (75-100 mg/daily) may also be considered. According to available evidence direct oral anticoagulants should be avoided in patients with arterial thrombosis and/or those with triple aPL positivity. Adjunctive treatment with HCQ and/or statins can be considered, especially in anticoagulation treatment-refractory APS. Potential targeted treatments in APS include B-cell targeting, complement inhibition, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition, IFN targeting, adenosine receptors agonists, CD38 targeting or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. The safety and efficacy of these treatment targets needs to be examined in well-designed randomized controlled trials.

Epidemiology of antiphospholipid syndrome: macro- and microvascular manifestations

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by thrombotic and non-thrombotic macro- and microvascular manifestations and pregnancy complications in the setting of persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), namely anticardiolipin antibodies, anti-β2 glycoprotein-I antibodies and lupus anticoagulant. Four decades after its first description, APS prevalence and incidence are still not completely understood due to the limited number of well-designed, population-based multi-ethnic studies. Furthermore, despite decades of efforts to standardise aPL immunoassays, considerable intraassay and interlaboratory variances in aPL measures still exist. Large multicentre APS cohorts have shown a 10-year survival of ∼91% and the presence of catastrophic APS occurs in about 1% of the entire population, associated with a 50% mortality rate. Clinically, any organ can be affected in the context of large, medium or small vessel (artery and/or vein) thrombosis. Macrovascular thrombosis is the hallmark of the disease and veins are more frequently affected than arteries. Deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism thromboembolic disease is the most common APS manifestation, while stroke and transient ischaemic attack are the most frequent arterial thrombosis events. Myocardial infarction can also occur and contributes to increased mortality in APS. A minority of patients present with thrombosis affecting the intraabdominal organs, including the liver, spleen, small and large bowel, and the kidneys. Microvascular thrombosis, including APS nephropathy, chronic skin ulcers and livedoid vasculopathy represent a diagnostic challenge requiring histologic confirmation. In this narrative review we summarize the available evidence on APS epidemiology, focusing on the description of the prevalence of macro- and microvascular manifestations of the disease.

Thrombocytopenia in antiphospholipid syndrome: Is anticoagulation and/or antiaggregation always required?

The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune and prothrombotic condition defined by the association of thrombotic events and/or obstetrical complications and the persistence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) over time. Among the new criteria recently included in the 2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for APS, thrombocytopenia is one of the most frequent. The occurrence of thrombocytopenia in aPL/APS patients is important to consider because it could predict APS-related clinical events with a 3-fold increased risk for thrombotic events or obstetrical morbidity or all-cause deaths. A debate on the need or not of anticoagulation and/or antiaggregation in APS patients and aPL carriers with thrombocytopenia took place on the 7th edition of the International Congress on Controversies in Rheumatology and Autoimmunity (CORA), that was organized in Turin, Italy, on March 18th, 2023, and this review summarizes the main arguments that were discussed in this session.

Pulmonary involvement in catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome: A descriptive analysis from the "CAPS Registry"

OBJECTIVES

To describe the pulmonary involvement in patients with catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS), focusing on its relationship with extrapulmonary involvement, laboratory, radiological, and pathological findings.

METHODS

This retrospective cross-sectional study includes all patients grouped in the "CAPS Registry". All cases were reviewed, and those with pulmonary thromboembolism (PE) and/or diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH) were selected. Data on pulmonary and extrapulmonary clinical presentation, radiologic patterns, laboratory findings, associated autoimmune diseases, treatments, and outcomes were analyzed. Frequency distribution and measures of central tendency were used to describe the cohort. Comparison between groups regarding qualitative variables was undertaken by chi-square or Fisher exact test, while T-test for independent variables was used to compare groups regarding continuous variables. IBM-SPSS v.22 was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

PE was reported in 129 (48.6 %) episodes, DAH in 75 (28.3 %) episodes, and overlap (DAH plus PE) in 7 (2.6 %) episodes. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed in 35 (4.9 %) CAPS episodes, and lung pathology samples were obtained in 84 (10.5 %) episodes (including autopsies). A significant relationship was observed between DAH and laboratory features of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). A meaningful relationship was also found between triple antiphospholipid antibody positivity and pathological TMA (26.5 %) as well as hypocomplementemia and DAH (24 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Pulmonary involvement may include both TMA and non-thrombotic inflammation, which can be differentiated into three patterns: PE, DAH with systemic TMA with hypocomplementemia or DAH without systemic TMA with/without hypocomplementemia.

Clinical features, risk factors, and outcomes of diffuse alveolar hemorrhage in antiphospholipid syndrome: A mixed-method approach combining a multicenter cohort with a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease clinically associated with thrombotic and obstetric events. Additional manifestations have been associated with APS, like diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH). We aimed to summarize all the evidence available to describe the presenting clinical features, their prognostic factors, and short- and long-term outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a mixed-method approach combining a multicenter cohort with a systematic literature review (SLR) of patients with incident APS-associated DAH. We described their clinical features, treatments, prognostic factors, and outcomes (relapse, mortality, and requirement of mechanical ventilation [MV]). Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate relapse and mortality rates, and Cox and logistic regression models were used to assess the factors associated as appropriate.

RESULTS

We included 219 patients with incident APS-associated DAH (61 from Mayo Clinic and 158 from SLR). The median age was 39.5 years, 51% were female, 29% had systemic lupus erythematosus, and 34% presented with catastrophic APS (CAPS). 74% of patients had a history of thrombotic events, and 26% of women had a history of pregnancy morbidity; half of the patients had a history of thrombocytopenia, and a third had valvulopathy. Before DAH, 55% of the patients were anticoagulated. At DAH onset, 65% of patients presented hemoptysis. The relapse rate was 47% at six months and 52% at one year. Triple positivity (HR 4.22, 95% CI 1.14-15.59) was associated with relapse at six months. The estimated mortality at one and five years was 30.3% and 45.8%. Factors associated with mortality were severe thrombocytopenia (< 50 K/μL) (HR 3.10, 95% CI 1.39-6.92), valve vegetations (HR 3.22, 95% CI 1.14-9.07), CAPS (HR 3.80, 95% CI 1.84-7.87), and requirement of MV (HR 2.22, 95% CI 1.03-4.80). Forty-two percent of patients required MV on the incident DAH episode. Patients presenting with severe thrombocytopenia (OR 6.42, 95% CI 1.77-23.30) or CAPS (OR 4.30, 95% CI 1.65-11.16) were more likely to require MV.

CONCLUSION

APS-associated DAH is associated with high morbidity and mortality, particularly when presenting with triple positivity, thrombocytopenia, valvular involvement, and CAPS.

Antiphospholipid syndrome nephropathy: Current knowledge and unanswered questions

The definition of acute and chronic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) nephropathy was recently updated using a multiphase methodology in the context of the development of the new APS classification criteria. Currently, there is no consensus for the treatment of APS nephropathy, which mainly relies on the general recommendations for the management of APS. Based on evidence from experimental studies and a few clinical studies and case series, targeted treatments such as B-cell depletion, anti-B-cell activating factor antibody, complement inhibition, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition, and neutrophil extracellular traps or interferon targeting may show promise for the treatment of microvascular manifestations in APS, including APS nephropathy. Validation of the new APS nephropathy definition and/or efforts for improvement in proposed terminology, along with the assessment of the safety and efficacy of potential targeted treatments in randomized controlled trials, are major future research directions. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge of APS nephropathy and discuss unanswered questions.

Heart Valve Involvement in Patients with Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study of a Single Centre

BACKGROUND

Valve involvement is the most common cardiac manifestation in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). The objective of the study was to describe the prevalence, clinical and laboratory features, and evolution of APS patients with heart valve involvement.

METHODS

A retrospective longitudinal and observational study of all APS patients followed by a single centre with at least one transthoracic echocardiographic study.

RESULTS

144 APS patients, 72 (50%) of them with valvular involvement. Forty-eight (67%) had primary APS, and 22 (30%) were associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Mitral valve thickening was the most frequent valve involvement present in 52 (72%) patients, followed by mitral regurgitation in 49 (68%), and tricuspid regurgitation in 29 (40%) patients. Female sex (83% vs. 64%; p = 0.013), arterial hypertension (47% vs. 29%; p = 0.025), arterial thrombosis at APS diagnosis (53% vs. 33%; p = 0.028), stroke (38% vs. 21%; p = 0.043), livedo reticularis (15% vs. 3%; p = 0.017), and lupus anticoagulant (83% vs. 65%; p = 0.021) were more prevalent in those with valvular involvement. Venous thrombosis was less frequent (32% vs. 50%; p = 0.042). The valve involvement group suffered from higher mortality (12% vs. 1%; p = 0.017). Most of these differences were maintained when we compared patients with moderate-to-severe valve involvement (n = 36) and those with no or mild involvement (n = 108).

CONCLUSIONS

Heart valve disease is a frequent manifestation in our cohort of APS patients and is associated with demographic, clinical and laboratory features, and increased mortality. More studies are needed, but our results suggest that there may be a subgroup of APS patients with moderate-to-severe valve involvement with its own characteristics that differs from the rest of the patients with mild valve involvement or without valve involvement.

Whole blood transcriptome identifies interferon-regulated genes as key drivers in thrombotic primary antiphospholipid syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Pathogenesis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) isn't fully elucidated. We aimed to identify gene signatures characterizing thrombotic primary APS (thrPAPS) and subgroups at high risk for worse outcomes.

METHODS

We performed whole blood next-generation RNA-sequencing in 62 patients with thrPAPS and 29 age-/sex-matched healthy controls (HCs), followed by differential gene expression analysis (DGEA) and enrichment analysis. We trained models on transcriptomics data using machine learning.

RESULTS

DGEA of 12.306 genes revealed 34 deregulated genes in thrPAPS versus HCs; 33 were upregulated by at least 2-fold, and 14/33 were type I and II interferon-regulated genes (IRGs) as determined by interferome database. Machine learning applied to deregulated genes returned 79% accuracy to discriminate thrPAPS from HCs, which increased to 82% when only the most informative IRGs were analyzed. Comparison of thrPAPS subgroups versus HCs showed an increased presence of IRGs among upregulated genes in venous thrombosis (21/23, 91%), triple-antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) positive (30/50, 60%), and recurrent thrombosis (19/42, 45%) subgroups. Enrichment analysis of upregulated genes in triple-aPL positive patients revealed terms related to 'type I interferon signaling pathway' and 'innate immune response'. DGEA among thrPAPS subgroups revealed upregulated genes, including IRGs, in patients with venous versus arterial thrombosis (n = 11, 9 IRGs), triple-aPL versus non-triple aPL (n = 10, 9 IRGs), and recurrent versus non-recurrent thrombosis (n = 10, 3 IRGs).

CONCLUSION

Upregulated IRGs may better discriminate thrPAPS from HCs than all deregulated genes in peripheral blood. Taken together with DGEA data, IRGs are highly expressed in thrPAPS and high-risk subgroups of triple-aPL and recurrent thrombosis, with potential treatment implications.

Risk of livedo with antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Livedo is a well-known skin condition in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) which correspond to small vessels involvement. The influence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) on the occurrence of livedo is controversial. The aim of our study was to estimate the risk of livedo associated with aPL in patients with SLE.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature from 1977 to 2021 to estimate the risk of livedo in SLE patients according to different aPL profiles. Data sources were PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, hand search, and reference lists of studies. Studies were selected if they included SLE patients with descriptions of the exposure to aPL and the outcome ( livedo). Two independent investigators assessed study eligibility, quality, and extracted patient characteristics from each study as well as exposure (aPL) and outcome ( livedo). Risk estimates were pooled using random effects models and sensitivity analyses. For all stages of the meta-analysis, we followed the PRISMA guidelines. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42015027377.

Results

Of the 2,355 articles identified, 27 were included with a total of 4,810 SLE patients. The frequency of livedo was 25.5% in aPL-positive patients and 13.3% in aPL-negative patients. The overall Odds Ratio (OR) for livedo in aPL-positive patients compared to aPL-negative patients was 2.91 (95% CI; 2.17–3.90). The risk of livedo was significantly increased for most of aPL subtypes, including lupus anticoagulant (LA) (OR = 4.45 [95% CI; 2.21–8.94]), IgG anticardiolipin (OR = 3.95 [95% CI; 2.34–6.65]), and IgG anti-β2-glycoprotein 1 (OR = 3.49 [95% CI; 1.68–7.27]).

Conclusions

We demonstrated in this meta-analysis an excess risk of livedo in aPL-positive SLE patients compared to aPL-negative patients. For daily practice, in patients with SLE, livedo associated with aPL could correspond to a peculiar group of patients with small vessel disease. Livedo could be a good candidate for inclusion in future classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome.

Challenging clinical scenarios for therapeutic anticoagulation: A practical approach

Therapeutic anticoagulation remains a fundamental backbone in the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism. However, while modern therapies are increasingly safe, anticoagulation is not without risks, particularly in those at high risk for or with recent bleeding. When weighing concurrent risks and benefits in each challenging clinical scenario, an individualized assessment of the risk and acuity of bleeding should be balanced by the indication for anticoagulation. Addressing modifiable risk factors and routine re-evaluation of any changes in this balance is critical. This review outlines available data and current guidelines for the management of anticoagulation in high-risk populations, including those with thrombocytopenia, elderly and high-fall risk, inherited bleeding disorders, and in acute coronary syndrome. We also examine management after clinically significant bleeding episodes, including intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding, hemoptysis, retroperitoneal bleeding, hematuria, and abnormal uterine bleeding. The aim is to provide a comprehensive review of available literature to guide clinicians in providing optimal, safe, and individualized care for patients in these challenging scenarios.

Increased risk of acute and chronic microvascular renal lesions associated with antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Microvascular renal lesions have been described in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), however their association with aPL is inconsistent among studies. Therefore, our objective was to investigate associations between microvascular renal lesions and aPL among systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients.

METHODS

Studies were selected if they included SLE patients with and without aPL positivity with a description of kidney biopsy identifying acute and/or chronic microvascular renal lesions as well as lupus nephritis. Data sources were Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, hand search, congress abstracts, and reference lists of studies, without language restrictions. Risk estimates were independently extracted by 2 investigators. Pooled effect estimates were obtained by using the Mantel-Haenszel method (random effects).

RESULTS

Of 1860 identified records obtained between 1991 and 2021, 35 published studies (10 cohorts, 7 case-control, 18 cross-sectional) met inclusion criteria, including 3035 SLE patients according to American College of Rheumatology criteria and 454 cases of microvascular renal lesions. Frequency of microvascular renal lesions in aPL-positive vs. aPL-negative SLE patients was 31.3% vs. 10.4%, respectively. The overall pooled odds ratios (OR) for microvascular renal lesions in aPL-positive vs. aPL-negative SLE patients was 3.03 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.25-4.09). The risk of microvascular renal lesions was the highest for lupus anticoagulant (OR = 4.84 [95% CI, 2.93 to 8.02]) and IgG anticardiolipin antibodies (OR = 3.12 [95% CI,1.08-9.02]) while the association with anti-β₂-glycoprotein I antibodies (OR = 1.88 [95% CI, 0.25-14.14]) did not reach statistical significance. Furthermore, aPL were not associated with any classes of lupus nephritis.

CONCLUSION

In SLE patients, aPL-positivity is associated with a significant 3- to 5-fold increased risk for specific microvascular renal lesions. This risk is mainly driven by lupus anticoagulant and IgG anticardiolipin antibodies. Our results support the inclusion of microvascular renal lesions as new criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome.

Cognitive Impairment in Anti-Phospholipid Syndrome and Anti-Phospholipid Antibody Carriers

Cognitive impairment is frequently reported among anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS) patients as well as anti-phospholipid antibody (aPL) carriers, but it is less studied than other manifestations of this condition. Moreover, the exact prevalence of cognitive impairment in these patients has not been accurately determined, mainly due to inconsistency in the tools used to identify impairment, small sample sizes, and variability in the anti-phospholipid antibodies measured and positivity cutoffs. The notion of a direct pathogenic effect is supported by the observation that the higher the number of aPLs present and the higher the load of the specific antibody, the greater the risk of cognitive impairment. There is some evidence to suggest that besides the thrombotic process, inflammation-related pathways play a role in the pathogenesis of cognitive impairment in APS. The cornerstone treatments of APS are anti-coagulant and anti-thrombotic medications. These treatments have shown some favorable effects in reversing cognitive impairment, but solid evidence for the efficacy and safety of these treatments in the context of cognitive impairment is still lacking. In this article, we review the current knowledge regarding the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical associations, and treatment of cognitive impairment associated with APS and aPL positivity.

Non-criteria manifestations in primary antiphospholipid syndrome: a French multicenter retrospective cohort study

Background

From this retrospective study, we aimed to (1) describe the prevalence and characteristics of non-criteria features in primary antiphospholipid syndrome (p-APS) and (2) determine their prognostic value.

Methods

This retrospective French multicenter cohort study included all patients diagnosed with p-APS (Sydney criteria) between January 2012 and January 2019. We used Kaplan-Meier and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models to compare the incidence of relapse in p-APS with and without non-criteria manifestations.

Results

One hundred and seventy-nine patients with p-APS were included during the study time, with a median age of 52.50 years [39.0; 65.25] and mainly women (n = 112; 62.6%). Among them, forty-three patients (24.0%) presented at least one non-criteria manifestation during the follow-up: autoimmune cytopenias (n = 17; 39.5%), Libman Sachs endocarditis (n = 5; 11.6%), APS nephropathy (n = 4; 9.3%), livedo reticularis (n = 8; 18.6%), and neurological manifestations (n = 12; 27.9%). In comparison to p-APS without any non-criteria manifestations (n = 136), p-APS with non-criteria features had more arterial thrombosis (n = 24; 55.8% vs n = 48; 35.3%; p = 0.027) and more frequent pre-eclampsia (n = 6; 14.3% vs n = 4; 3.1%; p = 0.02). The prevalence of triple positivity was significantly increased in patients with non-criteria features (n = 20; 47.6% vs n = 25; 19.8%; p = 0.001). Patients with p-APS and non-criteria manifestations (n = 43) received significantly more additional therapies combined with vitamin K antagonists and/or antiaggregants. Catastrophic APS (CAPS) tended to be more frequent in p-APS with non-criteria features (n = 2; 5.1% vs none; p = 0.074).

The p-APS with non-criteria manifestations had significantly increased rates of relapse (n = 20; 58.8% vs 33; 33.7%; p = 0.018) in bivariate analysis, but in survival analyses, the hazard ratio (HR) of relapse was not significantly different between the two groups (HR at 1.34 [0.67; 2.68]; p = 0.40).

Conclusions

The presence of non-criteria features is important to consider, as they are associated with particular clinical and laboratory profiles, increased risk of relapse, and need for additional therapies. Prospective studies are necessary to better stratify the prognosis and the management of p-APS.

An Update on Antiphospholipid Syndrome

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the recent available evidence on epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical phenotypes, and management of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and summarize potential future research perspectives.

RECENT FINDINGS

Accumulating evidence has further expanded our understanding of the disease, including new data about the incidence and prevalence of APS, novel pathways supporting the role of thrombo-inflammation in APS including platelet, monocyte and endothelial cell activation, pro-inflammatory cytokine and chemokine production, complement activation, neutrophil extracellular trap release, and type I interferon gene expression that could yield to new potential treatment targets, better identification of criteria and non-criteria clinical phenotypes, antiphospholipid antibody profiles and their associations with clinical outcomes, prognostic tools, and treatment strategies based on recent evidence-based recommendations for patients with thrombotic and obstetric APS, with or without systemic lupus erythematosus. Ongoing research efforts and international collaborations enhance our knowledge of this rare and often devastating syndrome and help improve patient care and health outcomes.

Osteonecrosis in Primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome is Associated with Previous Glucocorticoid Use and Thrombocytopenia

Introduction

The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of avascular necrosis (AVN) and its associations with clinical and laboratory parameters in patients with primary antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (pAPS).

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study of 66 patients with pAPS who fulfilled the Sidney criteria for APS. Epidemiological and clinical data, and data on antiphospholipid antibodies were collected. Diagnosis of AVN was based on studies of magnetic resonance (MRI) images of affected bones.

Results

AVN was found in three of the 66 (4.5%) enrolled patients. Comparison of patients with pAPS with and without AVN showed that demographic data, comorbidities, and antiphospholipid antibodies profile were similar in both groups. Compared to patients without AVN, those with AVN had thrombocytopenia more frequently (66.7 vs. 7.9%) and used more glucocorticoids (100 vs. 35%).

Conclusion

AVN is rare in patients with pAPS and may be associated with thrombocytopenia and previous glucocorticoid use.

Management of patients with antiphospholipid antibodies: what to do in laboratory scenarios that do not fit the guidelines

Introduction: Some patients with positive antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) have not been included in randomized clinical trials or observational registries and, therefore, information on their risk of obstetric or thrombotic recurrence and optimal treatment is scarce.Areas covered: In the present review, the existing evidence regarding the management of two laboratory scenarios not covered by the guidelines is presented: (1) patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) clinical manifestations and aPL positivity not fulfilling APS laboratory criteria, and (2) the possibility of discontinuing anticoagulation in APS patients whose aPL become persistently negative.Expert opinion: Growing evidence suggests a role for low titers and 'non-criteria' aPL, especially in obstetric APS. Treatment is not formally recommended but might be considered according to the individual's risk profile. Regarding the question of whether or not to discontinue anticoagulants after the 'spontaneous' disappearance of aPL, there is no definite answer. Retrospective studies seem to suggest that withdrawal of anticoagulation could be safe in certain patients with APS, especially in those with a first provoked venous thrombosis and whose aPL became persistently negative during follow-up. Still, before the withdrawal can be recommended in routine clinical practice, multicenter and prospective studies are required to validate this hypothesis.

Pediatric Antiphospholipid Syndrome: from Pathogenesis to Clinical Management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Elucidating the pathogenic mechanisms mediated by antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) might exert important clinical implications in pediatric antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).

RECENT FINDINGS

aPL are traditionally regarded as the main pathogenic players in APS, inducing thrombosis via the interaction with fluid-phase and cellular components of coagulation. Recent APS research has focused on the role of β2 glycoprotein I, which bridges innate immunity and coagulation. In pediatric populations, aPL should be screened in appropriate clinical settings, such as thrombosis, multiple-organ dysfunction, or concomitant systemic autoimmune diseases. Children positive for aPL tests often present non-thrombotic non-criteria manifestations or asymptomatic aPL positivity. In utero aPL exposure has been suggested to result in developmental disabilities, warranting long-term follow-up. The knowledge of the multifaceted nature of pediatric APS should be implemented to reduce the risk of underdiagnosing/undertreating this condition. Hopefully, recent pathogenic insights will open new windows of opportunity in the management of pediatric APS.