1
|
Ba Y, Yue P, Leung JW, Wang H, Lin Y, Bai B, Zhu X, Zhang L, Zhu K, Wang W, Meng W, Zhou W, Liu Y, Li X. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage may be the preferred preoperative drainage method in hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Endosc Int Open 2020; 8:E203-E210. [PMID: 32010755 PMCID: PMC6976325 DOI: 10.1055/a-0990-9114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2019] [Accepted: 05/22/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Preoperative biliary drainage of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) is controversial. The goal of this study was to compare the clinical outcome and associated complications for types II, III, and IV HC managed by percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Patients and methods Between January 2011 and June 2017, a total of 180 patients with II, III, and IV HC were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. According to the drainage method, patients were divided into two groups: PTBD (n = 81) and ERCP (n = 99). This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03104582, and was completed. Results Compared with the PTBD group, the ERCP group had a higher incidence of post-procedural cholangitis (37 [37.37 %] vs. 18 [22.22 %], P = 0.028) and pancreatitis (17 [17.17 %] vs. 2 [2.47 %], P = 0.001); required more salvaged biliary drainage (18 [18.18 %] vs. 5 [6.17 %], P = 0.029), and incurred a higher cost ( P < 0.05). Patients with type III and IV HC in the ERCP group had more cholangitis than those in the PTBD group (26 [36.62 %] vs. 11 [18.03 %], P = 0.018). The rate of cholangitis in patients who received endoscopic bilateral biliary stents insertion was higher than patients with unilateral stenting (23 [50.00 %] vs. 9 [26.47 %], P = 0.034), and underwent PTBD internal-external drainage had a higher incidence of cholangitis than those with only external drainage (11 [34.36 %] vs. 7 [14.29 %], P = 0.034). No significant difference in the rate of cholangitis was observed between the endoscopic unilateral stenting group and the endoscopic nasobiliary drainage group (9 [26.47 %] vs. 5 [26.32 %], P = 0.990). Conclusion Compared to ERCP, PTBD reduced the rate of cholangitis, pancreatitis, salvage biliary drainage, and decreased hospitalization costs in patients with types II, III, and IV HC. Risk of cholangitis for patients with types III and IV was significantly lower in the PTBD group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongjiang Ba
- The First Clinical Medical School of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China,Department of Special Minimally Invasive Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China,The Second Department of General Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Qujing City, Qujing, China
| | - Ping Yue
- The First Clinical Medical School of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China,Department of Special Minimally Invasive Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China,Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, Gansu, China,Key Laboratory of Biological Therapy And Regenerative Medicine Transformation Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China,Clinical Medical College Cancer Center of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Joseph W. Leung
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, UC Davis Medical Center, and Section of Gastroenterology, Sacramento VA Medical Center, Sacramento, California, United States
| | - Haiping Wang
- The First Clinical Medical School of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China,Key Laboratory of Biological Therapy And Regenerative Medicine Transformation Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China,Clinical Medical College Cancer Center of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yanyan Lin
- The First Clinical Medical School of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China,Department of Special Minimally Invasive Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China,Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, Gansu, China,Key Laboratory of Biological Therapy And Regenerative Medicine Transformation Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China,Clinical Medical College Cancer Center of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Bing Bai
- The First Clinical Medical School of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China,Department of Special Minimally Invasive Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China,Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, Gansu, China,Key Laboratory of Biological Therapy And Regenerative Medicine Transformation Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China,Clinical Medical College Cancer Center of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xiaoliang Zhu
- The First Clinical Medical School of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China,Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, Gansu, China,Key Laboratory of Biological Therapy And Regenerative Medicine Transformation Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China,Clinical Medical College Cancer Center of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China,The Second Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Lei Zhang
- The First Clinical Medical School of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China,Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, Gansu, China,Key Laboratory of Biological Therapy And Regenerative Medicine Transformation Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China,Clinical Medical College Cancer Center of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China,The Fifth Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Kexiang Zhu
- The First Clinical Medical School of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China,Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, Gansu, China,Key Laboratory of Biological Therapy And Regenerative Medicine Transformation Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China,Clinical Medical College Cancer Center of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China,The Second Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Wenhui Wang
- The First Clinical Medical School of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China,The Department of Interventional Medicine, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Wenbo Meng
- The First Clinical Medical School of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China,Department of Special Minimally Invasive Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China,Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, Gansu, China,Key Laboratory of Biological Therapy And Regenerative Medicine Transformation Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China,Clinical Medical College Cancer Center of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China,Corresponding author Wenbo Meng The First Hospital of Lanzhou UniversityDepartment of Special Minimally Invasive SurgeryNO.1 DongGang West RoadLanZhou, Gansu 730000Lanzhou 730000China+86 931 8356022
| | - Wence Zhou
- The First Clinical Medical School of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China,Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, Gansu, China,Key Laboratory of Biological Therapy And Regenerative Medicine Transformation Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China,Clinical Medical College Cancer Center of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China,The Second Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Ying Liu
- Foreign Languages Department of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xun Li
- The First Clinical Medical School of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China,Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, Gansu, China,Key Laboratory of Biological Therapy And Regenerative Medicine Transformation Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China,Clinical Medical College Cancer Center of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China,The Fifth Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tang Z, Yang Y, Meng W, Li X. Best option for preoperative biliary drainage in Klatskin tumor: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96:e8372. [PMID: 29069029 PMCID: PMC5671862 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000008372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2017] [Revised: 09/13/2017] [Accepted: 10/03/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The operative treatment combined with preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) has been established as a safe Klatskin tumor (KT) treatment strategy. However, there has always been a dispute for the preferred technique for PBD technique. This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the biliary drainage-related cholangitis, pancreatitis, hemorrhage, and the success rates of palliative relief of cholestasis between percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) and endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD), to identify the best technique in the management of KT.PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched systematically for prospective or retrospective studies reporting the biliary drainage-related cholangitis, pancreatitis, hemorrhage, and the success rates of palliative relief of cholestasis in patients with KT. A meta-analysis was performed, using the fixed or random-effect model, with Review Manager 5.3.PTBD was associated with lower risk of cholangitis (risk ratio [RR] = 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36-0.67; P < .00001), particularly in patients with Bismuth-Corlette type II, III, IV KT (RR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.33-0.77; P = .05). Compared with EBD, PTBD was also associated with a lower risk of pancreatitis (RR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.17-0.69; P = 0.003) and with higher successful rates of palliative relief of cholestasis (RR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.10-1.31; P < .0001). The incidence of hemorrhage was similar in these 2 groups (RR 1.29, 95% CI: 0.51-3.27; P = .59). The risk of biliary drainage-related cholangitis (RR = 1.96, 95% CI: 0.96-4.01; P = .06) and pancreatitis (RR = 1.62, 95% CI: 0.76-3.47; P = .21) was similar between endoscopic nasobiliary drainage groups and biliary stenting.In patients with type II or type III or IV KT who need to have PBD, PTBD should be performed as an initial method of biliary drainage in terms of reducing the incidence of procedure related cholangitis, pancreatitis, and improving the rates of palliative relief of cholestasis. Well-conducted randomized controlled trials with a universial criterion for PBD are required to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zengwei Tang
- The First Clinical Medical School of Lanzhou University
| | - Yuan Yang
- The First Clinical Medical School of Lanzhou University
| | - Wenbo Meng
- The First Clinical Medical School of Lanzhou University
- Department of Special Minimally Invasive Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University
- Clinical Medical College Cancer Center of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xun Li
- The First Clinical Medical School of Lanzhou University
- The second department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
- Clinical Medical College Cancer Center of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Paik WH, Park YS, Hwang JH, Lee SH, Yoon CJ, Kang SG, Lee JK, Ryu JK, Kim YT, Yoon YB. Palliative treatment with self-expandable metallic stents in patients with advanced type III or IV hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a percutaneous versus endoscopic approach. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69:55-62. [PMID: 18657806 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 188] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2007] [Accepted: 04/12/2008] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Endoscopic or percutaneous biliary drainage with self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) is widely used for the palliation of cholestasis in patients with advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma. However, little is known about which is the better option in patients with advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma. We compared the clinical outcomes of these 2 methods of biliary decompression in these patients. DESIGN AND SETTING Multicenter retrospective study. PATIENTS A total of 85 patients with newly diagnosed advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma (Bismuth III or Bismuth IV) and who did not receive an operation, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. Forty-four of the 85 received endoscopic SEMS and 41 received percutaneous SEMS. INTERVENTIONS Endoscopic SEMS or percutaneous SEMS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS Baseline characteristics were similar in the 2 groups, but the rate of successful biliary decompression was significantly higher in the percutaneous SEMS group than in the endoscopic SEMS group (92.7% vs 77.3%, respectively, P= .049). Overall rates of procedure-related complications were similar for the 2 groups, but 1 death (from biliary sepsis) occurred in the endoscopic SEMS group. Median survival of patients in whom biliary drainage was successful initially, regardless of which procedure was performed, was much longer than that of patients who had failed biliary drainage (8.7 months vs 1.8 months, respectively, P< .001). Once successful biliary decompression had been achieved, median survival and stent patency duration were similar in the 2 study groups. LIMITATION Retrospective study. CONCLUSIONS Percutaneous SEMS may be chosen for initial biliary drainage in patients with advanced type III or IV hilar cholangiocarcinoma, given higher initial success rate and low level of procedure-related cholangitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Woo Hyun Paik
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Silva MA, Tekin K, Aytekin F, Bramhall SR, Buckels JAC, Mirza DF. Surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma; a 10 year experience of a tertiary referral centre in the UK. Eur J Surg Oncol 2005; 31:533-9. [PMID: 15922889 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2005.02.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2004] [Revised: 02/22/2005] [Accepted: 02/28/2005] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the outcome of patients operated for hilar cholangiocarcinoma and analyse prognostic variables. PATIENTS AND METHODS A prospectively collected database on patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma, between 1992 and 2003, and relevant clinical notes were reviewed retrospectively. A total of 174 patients, 96 male, median age 63 years (27-86), were referred. Jaundice was the initial presentation in 167. RESULTS ERCP was the initial interventional investigation at the referring centre in 150, of which only 30 were stented successfully. PTC and decompression was carried out on 120. In 17, combined PTC and ERCP were required for placement of stents. Seventy-two underwent laparotomy at which 27 had locally advanced disease. Forty-five had potentially curative resections. Extra hepatic bile duct resection was done in 14 patients of which four were R0 resections. Thirty-one had bile duct resection including partial hepatectomy with 19 R0 resections (P=0.042). Post-operative complications developed in 19 patients, and there were 4 30 day mortalities [hepatic insufficiency:/sepsis (n=3), thrombosis of the reconstructed portal vein (n=1)]. Among the patients with R0 resections, the cumulative survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 year; was 83, 58, 41%, respectively, and in those with R1 resections were 71, 24, 24%, respectively, (P=0.021). Overall survival was shorter in patients with positive perineural invasion (P=0.066: NS). There was no significant difference in survival between the node positive and negative group. Median survival of patients who underwent liver resection was longer than those with bile duct resection only (30 vs 24 months P=0.43: NS). CONCLUSIONS ERCP was associated with a high failure rate in achieving pre-operative biliary decompression which was subsequently achieved by PTC. Clear histological margins were associated with improved survival and were better achieved by liver resection as compared to extra hepatic bile duct resection. Positive level I lymph nodes did not adversely impact survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A Silva
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, 3rd Floor, Nuffield House, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rerknimitr R, Kladcharoen N, Mahachai V, Kullavanijaya P. Result of endoscopic biliary drainage in hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Clin Gastroenterol 2004; 38:518-23. [PMID: 15220688 DOI: 10.1097/01.mcg.0000123204.36471.be] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Patients with hilar obstruction usually require bilateral biliary drainage. The prognosis of patients who fail bilateral biliary drainage after contrast injection into both intrahepatic ducts is poor due to a high infection rate in the undrained segments. The incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography cholangitis in those with successful bilateral biliary drainage was less, but still significant. Incomplete subsegmental intrahepatic duct drainage is suggested to be responsible for post-biliary drainage cholangitis in cases of advanced hilar tumors. This study was undertaken to determine the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography cholangitis, jaundice resolution, and stent clogging in different types of malignant biliary obstruction after biliary drainage. From our endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography database, there were 63 patients who underwent endoscopic biliary drainage between September 2000 and November 2001, for malignant biliary obstruction. Sixty-one endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies had biliary drainage performed (2 patients who failed biliary drainage were excluded). We divided our patients into 3 groups: Group 1 = Bismuth I, Group 2 = Bismuth II, and Group 3 = Bismuth III and IV. All but 2 Group 1 patients had successful biliary endoprosthesis (plastic [n = 13], metallic [n = 12], failed [n = 2]) placement into an extrahepatic duct. All patients from Group 2 (n = 10) and 20 patients from Group 3 (n = 26) had successful bilateral biliary drainage. Unilateral biliary drainage was performed in 6 patients from Group 3, each with a plastic endoprosthesis. The incidence of post-biliary drainage cholangitis (new onset of fever >38.5 degrees C with leukocytosis), jaundice resolution (normal bilirubin level), and the duration of endoprosthesis patency were compared among the 3 groups. The incidences of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography cholangitis, jaundice resolution, and the duration of endoprosthesis patency were: Group 1 (4%, 96%, and 87.2 days, respectively), Group 2 (10%, 100%, and 69.1 days, respectively) and Group 3 (57.7%, 73.1%, and 41.3 days, respectively). Of those patients who did not undergo surgery, patients from Group 3 required endoprosthesis exchange sooner than others. The outcome of biliary drainage in patients with advanced hilar tumors (Bismuth III or IV) was poorer than hilar tumor at earlier stages (Bismuth I or II).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rungsun Rerknimitr
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Chulalongkorn University Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|