Preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage by metal versus plastic stents for resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Adequate preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) is recommended in most patients with resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). Most expert centers use endoscopic plastic stents rather than self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs). In the palliative setting, however, use of SEMSs has shown longer patency and superior survival. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare stent dysfunction of SEMSs versus plastic stents for PBD in resectable pCCA patients.

METHODS

In this multicenter international retrospective cohort study, patients with potentially resectable pCCAs who underwent initial endoscopic PBD from 2010 to 2020 were included. Stent failure was a composite end point of cholangitis or reintervention due to adverse events or insufficient PBD. Other adverse events, surgical outcomes, and survival were recorded. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed on several baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 474 patients had successful stent placement, of whom 61 received SEMSs and 413 plastic stents. PSM (1:1) resulted in 2 groups of 59 patients each. Stent failure occurred significantly less in the SEMSs group (31% vs 64%; P < .001). Besides less cholangitis after SEMSs placement (15% vs 31%; P = .012), other PBD-related adverse events did not differ. The number of patients undergoing surgical resection was not significantly different (46% vs 49%; P = .71). Complete intraoperative SEMSs removal was successful and without adverse events in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Stent failure was lower in patients with SEMSs as PBD compared with plastic stents in patients with resectable pCCA. Removal during surgery was quite feasible. Surgical outcomes were similar.

Benefits and safety of photodynamic therapy in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a therapy evaluated for the treatment of cancers resistant to standard oncological treatments. PDT might be beneficial for the palliation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of PDT for treating hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for articles published up to May 2021. The patients were grouped as PDT+stent vs. stent alone. The outcomes were survival, quality of life, and adverse events (AEs). Data were summarized using hazard ratios (HRs), odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Six studies were included in this meta-analysis. There were 235 and 211 patients in the PDT+stent and stent groups, respectively. The 1-year survival rate of the PDT+stent group was 0.56, and that of the control group was 0.25. The 2-year survival rate of the PDT+stent group was 0.16, and that of the control group was 0.07. PDT significantly prolonged overall survival compared to the controls (P = 0.002). No differences were detected in the occurrence of cholangitis (P = 0.996) and all other AEs (early complications, stent malfunction, total AEs, acute pancreatitis, liver abscess, and biliary hemorrhage) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

PDT in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma could improve survival without additional AEs. Large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the findings.

Effect of preoperative cholangitis on prognosis of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes between patients with preoperative cholangitis and noncholangitis patients to determine whether the preoperative cholangitis would be able to serve as an independent predictive factor on hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCC) outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic literature search for reported preoperative cholangitis in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma was performed in 4 databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, published from 1979 to 2017.

RESULTS

In total, the initial search identified 1228 articles. Of these studies only 9 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this analysis. Differences between preoperative cholangitis existing and noncholangitis patients were observed in terms of mortality (RR = 2.29; 95% CI = 1.48-3.52; P = .0002), overall morbidity (RR = 1.15;95% CI = 1.00-1.32; P = .04), Liver failure (RR = 1.15;95% CI = 1.00-1.32; P = .04), Infection (RR = 1.52;95% CI = 1.16-2.00; P = .003), sepsis (RR = 2.40;95% CI = 1.25-4.5; P = .008).

CONCLUSIONS

The results lend support to the notion that in hilar cholangiocarcinoma patients, the existence of preoperative cholangitis is statistically associated with the higher postoperative mortality and morbidity. Also that it increases the risk of liver failure and infection. therefore, it is very important to properly control the preoperative cholangitis before surgery.