1
|
Gutierrez Torres S, Maldonado Magos F, Turcott JG, Hernandez‐Martinez J, Cacho‐Díaz B, Cardona A, Mota‐García A, Lozano Ruiz F, Ramos‐Ramirez M, Arrieta O. Re-irradiation in patients with progressive or recurrent brain metastases from extracranial solid tumors: A novel prognostic index. Cancer Med 2022; 12:146-158. [PMID: 35770957 PMCID: PMC9844632 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most studies evaluating factors associated with the survival of patients with brain metastases (BM) have focused on patients with newly diagnosed BM. This study aimed to identify prognostic factors associated with survival after brain re-irradiation in order to develop a new prognostic index. METHODS This 5-year retrospective study included patients treated with repeat-radiotherapy for recurrent BM at the "Instituto Nacional de Cancerología" of Mexico between 2015 and 2019. Significant variables in the multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to create the brain re-irradiation index (BRI). Survival and group comparisons were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. RESULTS Fifty-seven patients receiving brain re-irradiation were identified. Most patients were women (75.4%) with a mean age at BM diagnosis of 51.4 years. Lung and breast cancer were the most prevalent neoplasms (43.9% each). Independent prognostic factors for shorter survival after re-irradiation were: Age >50 years (hazard ratio [HR]:2.5 [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-5.8]; p = 0.026), uncontrolled primary tumor (HR:5.5 [95% CI, 2.2-13.5]; p < 0.001), lesion size >20 mm (4.6 [95% CI, 1.7-12.2]; p = 0.002), and an interval <12 months between radiation treatments (HR:4.3 [95% CI, 1.7-10.6]; p = 0.001). Median survival (MS) after re-irradiation was 14.6 months (95% CI, 8.2-20.9).MS of patients stratified according to the BRI score was 17.38, 10.34, and 2.82 months, with significant differences between all groups. CONCLUSIONS The new BRI can be easily implemented for the prognostic classification of cancer patients with progressive or recurrent BM from extracranial solid tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jenny G. Turcott
- Thoracic Oncology UnitInstituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan)Mexico CityMexico
| | - Juan‐Manuel Hernandez‐Martinez
- Thoracic Oncology UnitInstituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan)Mexico CityMexico,Cátedras CONACYT‐Instituto Nacional de CancerologíaMexico CityMexico
| | - Bernardo Cacho‐Díaz
- Neuro‐Oncology UnitInstituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan)Mexico CityMexico
| | - Andrés F. Cardona
- Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo Cancer Treatment and Research Center (CTIC)BogotáColombia,Foundation for Clinical and Applied Cancer Research (FICMAC)BogotáColombia,Molecular Oncology and Biology Systems Research Group (FOX‐G/ONCOLGroup)Universidad El BosqueBogotáColombia
| | - Aida Mota‐García
- Radiotherapy UnitInstituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan)Mexico CityMexico
| | | | | | - Oscar Arrieta
- Thoracic Oncology UnitInstituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan)Mexico CityMexico
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Balasubramanian SK, Sharma M, Venur VA, Schmitt P, Kotecha R, Chao ST, Suh JH, Angelov L, Mohammadi AM, Vogelbaum MA, Barnett GH, Jia X, Pennell NA, Ahluwalia MS. Impact of EGFR mutation and ALK rearrangement on the outcomes of non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastasis. Neuro Oncol 2021; 22:267-277. [PMID: 31648302 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noz155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of activating alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR] mutation/anaplastic lymphoma kinase [ALK] translocation) in prognosticating patients with brain metastasis (BM) is not well defined. This study was sought to identify this impact in NSCLC patients with BM accounting for the known validated variables. METHODS Among 1078 NSCLC-BM patients diagnosed/treated between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2015, three hundred and forty-eight with known EGFR/ALK status were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) and intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) were measured from the time of BM. RESULTS Ninety-one patients had either ALK (n = 23) alterations or EGFR (n = 68) mutation and 257 were wild type (WT; negative actionable mutations/alterations). Median age of EGFR/ALK+ NSCLC BM patients was 60 years (range 29.8-82.6 y) and ~50% (n = 44) had Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score >80. Median number of BM was 2 (1 to ≥99). The median OS for the ALK/EGFR+ NSCLC BM was 19.9 versus 10.1 months for the WT (P = 0.028). The number of BM in the EGFR/ALK+ group did not impact OS (BM = 1 with 21.1 months vs 2-3 with 19.1 months and >3 with 23.7 months, P = 0.74), whereas fewer BM in the WT cohort had significantly better OS (BM = 1 with 13.8 mo, 2-3 with 11.0 mo and >3 with 8.1 mo; P = 0.006) with the adjustment of age, KPS, symptoms from BM and synchronicity. CONCLUSIONS Number of BM does not impact outcomes in the EGFR/ALK+ NSCLC patients, implying that targeted therapy along with surgery and/or radiation may improve OS irrespective of the number of BM. Number of BM, extracranial metastasis (ECM), and KPS independently affected OS/PFS in WT NSCLC BM, which was consistent with the known literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mayur Sharma
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Philipp Schmitt
- Research Volunteer, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Rupesh Kotecha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Samuel T Chao
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - John H Suh
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Lilyana Angelov
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Alireza M Mohammadi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Michael A Vogelbaum
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Gene H Barnett
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Xuefei Jia
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Nathan A Pennell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Hematology/Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Manmeet S Ahluwalia
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.,Department of Hematology/Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Veccia A, Kinspergher S, Dipasquale M, Caffo O. Management of brain metastases from lung cancer in the era of immunotherapy: a review of the literature. Future Oncol 2021; 17:597-609. [PMID: 33401981 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2020-0701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The brain is one of the most frequent sites of metastases in lung cancer patients, whose prognosis is related to the histological, biomolecular and clinical features of the disease. Over the years, the survival has improved significantly with the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), but there are limited data concerning their efficacy in patients with brain metastases. The aim of this review is to describe the biological mechanisms supporting the use of immunotherapy for brain metastases and the outcomes experienced by lung cancer patients with brain involvement enrolled in Phase III registration trials of ICIs. We also review retrospective data on ICIs alone or combined with brain radiotherapy, and indicate future directions for preclinical and clinical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonello Veccia
- Medical Oncology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Largo Medaglie d'Oro 1, 38122, Trento, Italy
| | - Stefania Kinspergher
- Medical Oncology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Largo Medaglie d'Oro 1, 38122, Trento, Italy
| | | | - Orazio Caffo
- Medical Oncology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Largo Medaglie d'Oro 1, 38122, Trento, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Venur VA, Chukwueke UN, Lee EQ. Advances in Management of Brain and Leptomeningeal Metastases. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2020; 20:26. [PMID: 32506161 DOI: 10.1007/s11910-020-01039-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The management of brain and leptomeningeal metastases has changed significantly over the past decade. RECENT FINDINGS Historically, radiation therapy had been the mainstay of treatment. Several strategies to limit toxicities with radiation have been developed in the recent years. Increasingly systemic therapy options are being considered an important therapeutic option for CNS metastases. Numerous novel small molecule inhibitors and immunotherapy agents have intracranial activity to varying degrees, in addition to good extracranial disease control. Overall, the prognosis of select patients with CNS metastases has improved over the past several years with advent of new therapeutic strategies. Systemic therapy options with CNS benefit should be considered in select patients with small and asymptomatic CNS metastases. Further areas of research focus on molecular alterations predisposing to CNS metastases, identification of small molecule inhibitors with CNS activity, and the combination of radiation therapy and immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vyshak Alva Venur
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington Medicine, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ugonma N Chukwueke
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.,Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Eudocia Q Lee
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. .,Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. .,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Metastases to the central nervous system: Molecular basis and clinical considerations. J Neurol Sci 2020; 412:116755. [PMID: 32120132 DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.116755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Revised: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metastatic tumors are the most common malignancies of the central nervous system (CNS) in adults. CNS metastases are associated with unfavorable prognosis, high morbidity and mortality. Lung cancer is the most common source of brain metastases, followed by breast cancer and melanoma. Rising incidence is primarily due to improvements in systemic control of primary malignancies, prolonged survival and advances in cancer detection. PURPOSE To provide an overview of the metastatic cascade and the role of angiogenesis, neuroinflammation, metabolic adaptations, and clinical details about brain metastases from different primary tumors. METHODS A review of the literature on brain metastases was conducted, focusing on the pathophysiology and clinical aspects of the disease. PubMed was used to search for relevant articles published from January 1975 through December 2019 using the keywords brain metabolism, brain metastasis, metastatic cascade, molecular mechanisms, incidence, risk factors, and prognosis. 146 articles met the criteria and were included in this review. DISCUSSION Some primary tumors have a higher tendency to metastasize to the CNS. Establishing a suitable metastatic microenvironment is important in maintaining tumor cell growth and survival. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a widely used tool for diagnosis and treatment monitoring. Available treatments include surgery, radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and systemic targeted therapies. CONCLUSIONS Prevention of metastases to the CNS remains a difficult challenge. Advances in screening of high-risk patients and future development of novel treatments may improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
|
6
|
Comparison of Diagnosis-Specific Survival Scores for Patients with Small-Cell Lung Cancer Irradiated for Brain Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11020233. [PMID: 30781513 PMCID: PMC6406817 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11020233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2019] [Revised: 02/12/2019] [Accepted: 02/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Diagnosis-specific survival scores including a new score developed in 157 patients with brain metastases from small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) receiving whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with 30 Gy in 10 fractions (WBRT-30-SCLC) were compared. Three prognostic groups were designed based on the 6-month survival probabilities of significant or almost significant factors, (age, performance score, number of brain metastases, extra-cerebral metastasis). Six-month survival rates were 6% (6–11 points), 44% (12–14 points) and 86% (16–19 points). The WBRT-30-SCLC was compared to three disease-specific scores for brain metastasis from SCLC, the original and updated diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment DS-GPA classifications and the Rades-SCLC. Positive predictive values (PPVs) used to correctly predict death ≤6 months were 94% (WBRT-30-SCLC), 88% (original DS-GPA), 88% (updated DS-GPA) and 100% (Rades-SCLC). PPVs to predict survival ≥6 months were 86%, 75%, 76% and 100%. For WBRT-30-SCLC and Rades-SCLC, differences between poor and intermediate prognoses groups and between intermediate and favorable prognoses groups were significant. For both DS-GPA classifications, only the difference between poor and intermediate prognoses groups was significant. Of these disease-specific tools, Rades-SCLC appeared to be the most accurate in identifying patients dying ≤6 months and patients surviving ≥6 months after irradiation, followed by the new WBRT-30-SCLC and the DS-GPA classifications.
Collapse
|