1
|
Lim JH, Hunt BD, Findlater N, Tkacik PT, Dahlberg JL. "In Our Own Little World": Invisibility of the Social and Ethical Dimension of Engineering Among Undergraduate Students. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS 2021; 27:74. [PMID: 34882277 PMCID: PMC8660727 DOI: 10.1007/s11948-021-00355-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
This paper explores how undergraduate students understood the social relevance of their engineering course content knowledge and drew (or failed to draw) broader social and ethical implications from that knowledge. Based on a three-year qualitative study in a junior-level engineering class, we found that students had difficulty in acknowledging the social and ethical aspects of engineering as relevant topics in their coursework. Many students considered the immediate technical usability or improved efficiency of technical innovations as the noteworthy social and ethical implications of engineering. Findings suggest that highly-structured engineering programs leave little room for undergraduate students to explore the ethical dimension of engineering content knowledge and interact with other students/programs on campus to expand their "technically-minded" perspective. We discussed the issues of the "culture of disengagement" (Cech, Sci Technol Human Values 39(1):42-72, 2014) fueled by disciplinary elitism, spatial distance, and insulated curriculum prevalent in the current structure of engineering programs. We called for more conscious effort by engineering educators to offer meaningful interdisciplinary engagement opportunities and in-class conversations on ethics that support engineering students' holistic intellectual growth and well-rounded professional ethics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Hoon Lim
- Cato College of Education, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd, , Charlotte, NC USA
| | - Brittany D. Hunt
- Cato College of Education, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd, , Charlotte, NC USA
| | - Nickcoy Findlater
- Lee College of Engineering, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd, , Charlotte, NC USA
| | - Peter T. Tkacik
- Lee College of Engineering, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd, , Charlotte, NC USA
| | - Jerry L. Dahlberg
- Lee College of Engineering, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd, , Charlotte, NC USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Martin DA, Conlon E, Bowe B. A Multi-level Review of Engineering Ethics Education: Towards a Socio-technical Orientation of Engineering Education for Ethics. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS 2021; 27:60. [PMID: 34427811 PMCID: PMC8384818 DOI: 10.1007/s11948-021-00333-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2019] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
This paper aims to review the empirical and theoretical research on engineering ethics education, by focusing on the challenges reported in the literature. The analysis is conducted at four levels of the engineering education system. First, the individual level is dedicated to findings about teaching practices reported by instructors. Second, the institutional level brings together findings about the implementation and presence of ethics within engineering programmes. Third, the level of policy situates findings about engineering ethics education in the context of accreditation. Finally, there is the level of the culture of engineering education. The multi-level analysis allows us to address some of the limitations of higher education research which tends to focus on individual actors such as instructors or remains focused on the levels of policy and practice without examining the deeper levels of paradigm and purpose guiding them. Our approach links some of the challenges of engineering ethics education with wider debates about its guiding paradigms. The main contribution of the paper is to situate the analysis of the theoretical and empirical findings reported in the literature on engineering ethics education in the context of broader discussions about the purpose of engineering education and the aims of reform programmes. We conclude by putting forward a series of recommendations for a socio-technical oriented reform of engineering education for ethics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Adela Martin
- Philosophy and Ethics, Department IE&IS, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
- College of Engineering and Built Environment, Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Eddie Conlon
- College of Engineering and Built Environment, Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Brian Bowe
- Academic Affairs - City Campus, Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bombaerts G, Doulougeri K, Tsui S, Laes E, Spahn A, Martin DA. Engineering Students as Co-creators in an Ethics of Technology Course. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS 2021; 27:48. [PMID: 34297187 PMCID: PMC8302512 DOI: 10.1007/s11948-021-00326-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Research on the effectiveness of case studies in teaching engineering ethics in higher education is underdeveloped. To add to our knowledge, we have systematically compared the outcomes of two case approaches to an undergraduate course on the ethics of technology: a detached approach using real-life cases and a challenge-based learning (CBL) approach with students and stakeholders acting as co-creators (CC). We first developed a practical typology of case-study approaches and subsequently tested an evaluation method to assess the students' learning experiences (basic needs and motivation) and outcomes (competence development) and staff interpretations and operationalizations, seeking to answer three questions: (1) Do students in the CBL approach report higher basic needs, motivation and competence development compared to their peers in the detached approach? (2) What is the relationship between student-perceived co-creation and their basic needs, motivation and competence development? And (3) what are the implications of CBL/CC for engineering-ethics teaching and learning? Our mixed methods analysis favored CBL as it best supported teaching and research goals while satisfying the students' basic needs and promoting intrinsic motivation and communication competences. Competence progress in other areas did not differ between approaches, and motivation in terms of identified regulation was lower for CBL, with staff perceiving a higher workload. We propose that our case typology model is useful and that as a method to engage students as co-creators, CBL certainly merits further development and evaluation, as does our effectiveness analysis for engineering ethics instruction in general and for case-study approaches in particular.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gunter Bombaerts
- Philosophy and Ethics, Department IE&IS, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - Karolina Doulougeri
- Eindhoven School of Education (ESoE), Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Shelly Tsui
- Philosophy and Ethics, Department IE&IS, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Erik Laes
- Philosophy and Ethics, Department IE&IS, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- VITO - Vision on Technology, Boeretang 200, 2400, Mol, Belgium
| | - Andreas Spahn
- Philosophy and Ethics, Department IE&IS, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Diana Adela Martin
- Philosophy and Ethics, Department IE&IS, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- College of Engineering and Built Environment, Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Barak M, Green G. Applying a Social Constructivist Approach to an Online Course on Ethics of Research. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS 2021; 27:8. [PMID: 33538906 DOI: 10.1007/s11948-021-00280-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
The growing trend of shifting from classroom to distance learning in ethics education programs raises the need to examine ways for adapting best instructional practices to online modes. To address this need, the current study was set to apply a social constructivist approach to an online course in research ethics and to examine its effect on the learning outcomes of science and engineering graduate students. The study applied a pre-test post-test quasi-experimental research design within a framework of a mixed-methods approach. The study compared the learning outcomes of students who participated in a social constructivist online course (N = 175) with those who studied in a conventional online course (N = 170). The data were collected via questionnaires and interviews. The findings indicated that both the conventional and the social constructivist online learners gained knowledge of facts and regulations. Yet, the social constructivist learners were more successful in demonstrating knowledge of practices that are used to establish research ethics, and in understanding the importance of conducting research in a responsible manner. The social constructivist online learners were also more successful in demonstrating awareness of ethical dilemmas, by identifying ethical dilemmas and providing solutions to ethical problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miri Barak
- The Faculty of Education in Science and Technology, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, 320003, Haifa, Israel.
| | - Gizell Green
- The Faculty of Education in Science and Technology, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, 320003, Haifa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Clancy RF. The Ethical Education and Perspectives of Chinese Engineering Students: A Preliminary Investigation and Recommendations. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS 2020; 26:1935-1965. [PMID: 31115775 DOI: 10.1007/s11948-019-00108-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2018] [Accepted: 05/09/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
To develop more effective ethics education for cross-cultural and international engineering, a study was conducted to determine what Chinese engineering students have learned and think about ethics. Recent research shows traditional approaches to ethics education are potentially ineffective, but also points towards ways of improving ethical behaviors. China is the world's most populous country, graduating and employing the highest number of STEM majors, although little empirical research exists about the ethical knowledge and perspectives of Chinese engineering students. When compared to engineering students in the US, Chinese engineering students (1) received less ethics education; (2) the form of the education they did receive stressed virtue ethics or the development of moral character; (3) conceive of ethics in contradistinction to the law, where ethics deals with matters of right and wrong not covered by legality. Based on these findings and research in moral psychology and behavioral ethics, recommendations are made for improving engineering ethics education both in China and abroad.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rockwell F Clancy
- University of Michigan-Shanghai Jiao Tong University Joint Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Room 411C, Long Bin Building, 800 Dongchuan Road - Minhang District, Shanghai, 200240, China.
- Institute of Social Cognition and Decision-making, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Strenge B, Schack T. AWOSE - A Process Model for Incorporating Ethical Analyses in Agile Systems Engineering. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS 2020; 26:851-870. [PMID: 31588964 PMCID: PMC7089881 DOI: 10.1007/s11948-019-00133-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2018] [Accepted: 09/05/2019] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Ethical, legal and social implications are widely regarded as important considerations with respect to technological developments. Agile Worth-Oriented Systems Engineering (AWOSE) is an innovative approach to incorporating ethically relevant criteria during agile development processes through a flexibly applicable methodology. First, a predefined model for the ethical evaluation of socio-technical systems is used to assess ethical issues according to different dimensions. The second part of AWOSE ensures that ethical issues are not only identified, but also systematically considered during the design of systems based on information and communication technology. For this purpose, the findings from the first step are integrated with approaches from worth-centered development into a process model that, unlike previous approaches to ethical system development, is thoroughly compatible with agile methodologies like Scrum or Extreme Programming. Artifacts of worth-centered development called Worth Maps have been improved to guide the prioritization of development tasks as well as choices among design alternatives with respect to ethical implications. Furthermore, the improved Worth Maps facilitate the identification of suitable criteria for system evaluations in association to ethical concerns and desired positive outcomes of system usage. The potential of the AWOSE methodology has been demonstrated in the context of a technical system (smart glasses for cognitive assistance) that supports elderly and people with particular handicaps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Strenge
- Cluster of Excellence ‘Cognitive Interaction Technology’ (CITEC), Neurocognition and Action Research Group, Faculty of Psychology and Sports Science, Bielefeld University, Inspiration 1, 33619 Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Thomas Schack
- Cluster of Excellence ‘Cognitive Interaction Technology’ (CITEC), Neurocognition and Action Research Group, Faculty of Psychology and Sports Science, Bielefeld University, Inspiration 1, 33619 Bielefeld, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bustard JD. Improving Student Engagement in the Study of Professional Ethics: Concepts and an Example in Cyber Security. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS 2018; 24:683-698. [PMID: 28401507 PMCID: PMC5876413 DOI: 10.1007/s11948-017-9904-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2016] [Accepted: 03/19/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
In spite of the acknowledged importance of professional ethics, technical students often show little enthusiasm for studying the subject. This paper considers how such engagement might be improved. Four guiding principles for promoting engagement are identified: (1) aligning teaching content with student interests; (2) taking a pragmatic rather than a philosophical approach to issue resolution; (3) addressing the full complexity of real-world case studies; and (4) covering content in a way that students find entertaining. The use of these principles is then discussed with respect to the specific experience of developing and presenting a master's module in Ethical and Legal Issues in Cyber Security at Queens University Belfast. One significant aspect of the resulting design is that it encourages students to see ethical issues in systemic terms rather than from an individual perspective, with issues emerging from a conflict between different groups with different vested interests. Case studies are used to examine how personal and business priorities create conflicts that can lead to negative press, fines and punitive legal action. The module explores the reasons why organisations may be unaware of the risks associated with their actions and how an inappropriate response to an ethical issue can significantly aggravate a situation. The module has been delivered in three successive years since 2014 and been well received on each occasion. The paper describes the design of the module and the experience of delivering it, concluding with a discussion of the effectiveness of the approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John D Bustard
- School of Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Queen's University, Belfast, BT9 5AH, UK.
| |
Collapse
|