MRI-guided navigation surgery with temporary implantable bone markers in limb salvage for sarcoma

Does joint-sparing tumor resection jeopardize oncologic and functional outcomes in non-metastatic high-grade osteosarcoma around the knee?

BACKGROUND

We previously reported joint-sparing tumor resection for osteosarcoma with epiphyseal involvement in which transepiphyseal osteotomy went through the in situ ablated epiphysis. However, we do not know whether this is a safe approach when compared with joint-sacrificed tumor resection. Our objective was to compare oncologic and functional outcomes between patients who underwent joint preservation (JP) and joint replacement (JR) tumor resection. Furthermore, we identified the risk factors of local recurrence, metastasis and survival.

METHODS

Eighty-nine patients with non-metastatic high-grade osteosarcoma around the knee were treated with limb-salvage surgery (JP in 47 and JR in 42). Age, gender, tumor location, pathologic fracture, plain radiographic pattern, limb diameter change, perivascular space alteration, surgical margin, local recurrence, metastasis, death, and the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS)-93 scores were extracted from the records. Univariate analysis was performed to compare oncologic and functional outcomes. Binary logistic and cox regression models were used to identify predicted factors for local recurrence, metastasis, and survival.

RESULTS

Local recurrence, metastasis and overall survival were similar in the JP and JR group (p = 0.3; p = 0.211; p = 0.143). Major complications and limb survival were also similar in the JR and JP group (p = 0.14; p = 0.181). The MSTS score of 27.06 ± 1.77 in the JP group was higher than that of 25.88 ± 1.79 in the JR group (p = 0.005). The marginal margin of soft tissue compared with a wide margin was the only independent predictor of local recurrence (p = 0.006). Limb diameter increase and perivascular fat plane disappearance during neoadjuvant chemotherapy were independent predictors for metastasis (p = 0.002; p = 0.000) and worse survival (p = 0.000; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Joint-sparing tumor resection with the ablative bone margin offers advantage of native joint preservation with favorable functional outcomes while not jeopardizing oncologic outcomes compared with joint-sacrificed tumor resection. Surgeon should strive to obtain adequate soft tissue surgical margin decreasing risk of local recurrence. Novel drug regimens might be reasonable options for patients with obvious limb diameter increase and perivascular fat disappearance during chemotherapy.

Fluorescence guidance improves the accuracy of radiological imaging-guided surgical navigation

BACKGROUND

Imaging-based navigation technologies require static referencing between the target anatomy and the optical sensors. Imaging-based navigation is therefore well suited to operations involving bony anatomy; however, these technologies have not translated to soft-tissue surgery. We sought to determine if fluorescence imaging complement conventional, radiological imaging-based navigation to guide the dissection of soft-tissue phantom tumors.

METHODS

Using a human tissue-simulating model, we created tumor phantoms with physiologically accurate optical density and contrast concentrations. Phantoms were dissected using all possible combinations of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance, and fluorescence imaging; controls were included. The data were margin accuracy, margin status, tumor spatial alignment, and dissection duration.

RESULTS

Margin accuracy was higher for combined navigation modalities compared to individual navigation modalities, and accuracy was highest with combined CT and fluorescence navigation (p = 0.045). Margin status improved with combined CT and fluorescence imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

At present, imaging-based navigation has limited application in guiding soft-tissue tumor operations due to its inability to compensate for positional changes during surgery. This study indicates that fluorescence guidance enhances the accuracy of imaging-based navigation and may be best viewed as a synergistic technology, rather than a competing one.

Limited utility of intraoperative frozen sections in primary malignant tumours involving long bones - A multicenter analysis of 475 cases

Background

In the surgical removal of primary malignant tumours involving long bones, intraoperative frozen sections are used to ascertain the adequacy of tumour clearance. However, with the improved imaging modalities that provide better foreknowledge of the tumour extent, it is possible that the arduous task of performing frozen sections can be safely avoided. This would not only save procedural time but also reduce hospital costs. Presently, there are no clear guidelines regarding the modality required intraoperatively to assess tumour margins in these cases. Hence, in our retrospective multicentre analysis, we aimed at determining the usefulness of frozen sections in these cases.

Materials and methods

Our study is a 3-centre retrospective analysis of 475 cases (513 tumour margins) involving the surgical removal of primary malignancies of long bones. The preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and intraoperative assessment of the split specimen of the tumours were used to determine marginal clearance in all the cases in addition to frozen sections in 410 of the margins.

Results

Of the 410 frozen sections (centres 1 and 2), only one margin was reported positive and another reported indeterminate. All other margins were reported negative. In the first case, a 2 cm additional bone-cut was done whereas in the second, the procedure was proceeded based on the intraoperative agreement without re-cutting the margin. All these margins were negative in the final histopathology. In addition, in Centre 3, where frozen sections were not available, all the 103 cases had negative margins in the final histopathology.

Conclusion

In primary malignancies involving long bones, intraoperative decision making with the aid of MRI has been sufficiently accurate in identifying the required tumour margin without frozen sections. Hence, the added time and cost incurred by doing an additional procedure can be avoided in these cases.

•

Currently, there are no guidelines on the optimal marginal thickness required for tumour clearance in long bone tumours.

•

Our frozen section study analysed the correlation between frozen sections and final histopathology results.

•

Only 1 positive frozen smear was seen which was negative in the histopathology showing limited utility of frozen sections.

Feasibility study of intraoperative cone-beam CT navigation for benign bone tumour surgery

Background

Intraoperative cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) offers the advantage of navigation on the current anatomical situation and the possibility to take a control scan. We assessed the feasibility of using intraoperative CBCT for navigated intralesional curettage.

Methods

Nine benign bone tumour patients were studied. Feasibility was assessed by describing the workflow and indications for navigation, scoring CBCT image quality and registration accuracy, and measuring scan and navigation set‐up times. Short‐term follow‐up was described.

Results

CBCT navigation was successful in all patients. Median tumour visibility, tumour delineation, and vital structure visibility scores were good. Median registration accuracy score was very good. Median scan and verification times were 5 and 3 minutes, respectively. One patient had a tumour recurrence after 6 months.

Conclusions

Intraoperative CBCT navigation is feasible and safe. Indications for use of navigation in clinical practice are closeness to vital structures, complexly shaped tumours or bone, minimally invasive surgery, and repeated surgery.

Bone tumor resection guide using three-dimensional printing for limb salvage surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The three-dimensional (3D)-printed bone tumor resection guide can be personalized for a specific patient and utilized for bone tumor surgery. It is noninvasive, eidetic, and easy to use. We aimed to categorize the use of the 3D-printed guide and establish in vivo accuracy data.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 12 patients, who underwent limb salvage surgery using the 3D-printed guide at a single institution. To confirm the achievement of a safe bone margin, we compared the actual and planned distances between the cutting surface and tumor, which were reported in the final pathological report and measured from the same virtual cutting plane using graphical data of the cutting guide design, respectively.

RESULTS

The use of the 3D-printed guide was categorized as follows: (a) wide excision only, (b) wide excision and biological reconstruction with a structural bone allograft shaped in accordance with the 3D-printed guide, and (c) wide excision and reconstruction with a 3D-printed personalized implant. The maximal cutting error was 3 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3D-printed resection guide is easy to use and shows promise in the field of orthopedic oncology, with its application in bone tumor resection and reconstruction with a structural bone allograft or 3D-printed implant.

Transition from Tumor Tissue to Bone Marrow in Patients with Appendicular Osteosarcoma after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Background:

Limb-salvage surgery is the standard procedure for the treatment of appendicular osteosarcoma. Precise resection is the trend in limb-salvage surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate a large series of cases to identify the histological relationship between the tumor and marrow and determine the intramedullary transition type and width from the tumor to normal marrow in patients with osteosarcoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods:

One hundred and six osteosarcoma specimens were evaluated. The tissue specimens were sectioned through the coronal axis by an electronic saw. The tissue was immersed in formalin solution for fixation and subsequently decalcified. The interface between the tumor and normal bone marrow was grossly determined and submitted for microscopic evaluation to detect the relationship between the tumor and bone marrow and identify the transition type and width. All histological slides were examined by experienced orthopedic pathologists.

Results:

Histologically, the interface between the tumor and normal bone marrow was classified into two patterns: “clear” and “infiltrated.” The clear pattern, characterized by a clear boundary between the tumor and marrow, was identified in sixty cases (56.6%). A subtype of the clear type, characterized by fibrous bands between the tumor and marrow, was found in 13 cases (12.3%). The infiltrated pattern, characterized by a boundary with tumor cell clusters embedded in the marrow, was found in 46 cases (43.4%). The infiltrating depth varied from 1 to 4 mm (mean, 2.6 ± 0.7 mm). No tumor cells were observed in the normal bone marrow areas next to the interface.

Conclusions:

The transition from osteosarcoma tissue to bone marrow after neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be divided into two histological patterns: clear and infiltrated. The greatest infiltration width was 4 mm from tumor to normal marrow in this study. This depth should be considered in the presurgical plan.

MRI Identification of the Osseous Extent of Pediatric Bone Sarcomas

BACKGROUND

The quantitative accuracy of MRI in predicting the intraosseous extent of primary sarcoma of bone has not been definitively confirmed, although MRI is widely accepted as an accurate tool to plan limb salvage resections. Because inaccuracies in MRI determination of tumor extent could affect the ability of a tumor surgeon to achieve negative margins and avoid local recurrence, we thought it important to assess the accuracy of MR-determined tumor extent to the actual extent observed pathologically from resected specimens in pediatric patients treated for primary sarcomas of bone.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Does the quantitative pathologic bony margin correlate with that measured on preoperative MRI? (2) Are T1- or T2-weighted MRIs most accurate in determining a margin? (3) Is there a difference in predicting tumor extent between MRI obtained before or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and which is most accurate?

METHODS

We retrospectively studied a population of 211 potentially eligible patients who were treated with limb salvage surgery between August 1999 and July 2015 by a single surgeon at a single institution for primary sarcoma of bone. Of 131 patients (62%) with disease involving the femur or tibia, 107 (51%) were classified with Ewing's sarcoma or osteosarcoma. Records were available for review in our online database for 79 eligible patients (37%). Twenty-six patients (12%) were excluded because of insufficient or unavailable clinical or pathology data and 17 patients (8%) were excluded as a result of inadequate or incomplete MR imaging, leaving 55 eligible participants (26%) in the final cohort. The length of the resected specimen was superimposed on preresection MRI sequences to compare the margin measured by MRI with the margin measured by histopathology. Arithmetic mean differences and Pearson r correlations were used to assess quantitative accuracy (size of the margin).

RESULTS

All MR imaging types were positively associated with final histopathologic margin. T1-weighted MRI after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and final histopathologic margin had the strongest positive correlation of all MR imaging and time point comparisons (r = 0.846, p < 0.001). Mean differences existed between the normal marrow margin on T1-weighted MRI before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (t = 8.363; mean, 18.883 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI], 14.327-23.441; p < 0.001), T2-weighted MRI before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (t = 8.194; mean, 17.204 mm; 95% CI, 12.970-21.439; p < 0.001), T1-weighted after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (t = 10.808; mean, 22.178 mm; 95% CI, 18.042-26.313; p < 0.001), T2-weighted after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (t = 10.702; mean, 20.778 mm; 95% CI, 16.865-24.691; p < 0.001), and the final histopathologic margin. T1-weighted MRI after neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with the final histopathologic margin had the smallest mean difference in MRI-measured versus histopathologic margin size (mean, 5.9 mm; SD = 4.5 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

T1 MRI after neoadjuvant chemotherapy exhibited the strongest positive correlation and smallest mean difference compared with histopathologic margin. When planning surgical resections based on MRI obtained after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, for safety, one should account for a potential difference between the apparent margin of a tumor on an MRI and the actual pathologic margin of that tumor of up to 1 cm.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

Upper extremity sarcoma: impact of current practice guidelines and controversies on reconstructive approaches

The goals of sarcoma management include both a cure and the functional preservation of involved tissues and adjacent critical structures with common opinions favoring immediate reconstruction. The question arises whether these goals are contradictory. This paper discusses the question based on the experience of 28 patients with different types of extremity sarcoma, with 24 surgically treated by the University of California San Diego (UCSD) orthopedic and plastic surgery team (2011–2016) and the collection of evidence from published practice guidelines, reviews, case studies, and clinical trials. Included are the impact of limb-sparing and functional reconstructive concepts, efforts regarding the adequacy of surgical margins, and the rationale of immediate versus delayed reconstructive approaches, and the disease-free status of sarcoma management.

Intermittent internal fixation with a locking plate to preserve epiphyseal growth function during limb-salvage surgery in a child with osteosarcoma of the distal femur: a case report

Limb shortening is a problem associated with surgery for osteosarcoma of the lower extremity in adolescents, as the tumors frequently occur near the epiphysis. Herein we report the use of a less invasive stabilization system (LISS) and an intermittent fixation method to preserve the growth function of epiphysis in an 11-year-old patient with an osteosarcoma of the distal femur.The 11-year-old male presented with left knee enlargement and pain for 2 weeks, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and biopsy were consistent with osteosarcoma of the left distal femur. After preoperative chemotherapy, en bloc tumor resection was performed with margins based on MRI findings preserving the epiphyseal growth plate, the tumor cavity was filled with inactivated bone and bone cement, and a LISS was used to stabilize the femur. Aggressive postoperative chemotherapy was given. Approximately 105 weeks after surgery radiography showed that the distal end of the plate had moved superior to the epiphysis along with bone growth. Locking screws were placed in the distal part of the LISS plate to stabilize the re-implanted bone, and external fixation was not needed.The patient was able to walk with the crutches 1 week postoperatively, and bear weight on the extremity 6 weeks postoperatively. At 6 years after surgery, the patient's height had increased 52 cm, shortening of the affected limb was only 1 cm, and the circumference of the affected limb was 2 cm smaller than that of the contralateral limb. There was no significant discomfort in the affected limb, and there was no gait abnormality. The patient could jump and run, and could participate in sports including basketball and badminton to the same degree as his peers.In summary, the novel method of bone reconstruction and fixation provided good results in a child with an osteosarcoma of the distal femur. This fixation method preserves the osteogenic function of the epiphysis and restored bone integrity simultaneously, and provides good functional recovery.

Limb salvage: When, where, and how?

From an era where amputation was the only option to the current day function preserving resections and complex reconstructions has been a major advance in the treatment of musculoskeletal sarcomas. The objectives of extremity reconstruction after oncologic resection include providing skeletal stability where necessary, adequate wound coverage to allow early subsequent adjuvant therapy, optimising the aesthetic outcome and preservation of functional capability with early return to function. This article highlights the concepts of surgical margins in oncology, discusses the principles governing safe surgical resection in these tumors and summarises the current modalities and recent developments relevant to reconstruction after limb salvage. The rationale of choice of a particular resection modality and the unique challenges of reconstruction in skeletally immature individuals are also discussed. Striking the right balance between adequate resection, while yet retaining or reconstructing tissue for acceptable function and cosmesis is a difficult task. Complications are not uncommon and patients and their families need to be counseled regarding the potential setbacks that may occur in the course of their eventual road to recovery, Limb salvage entails a well orchestrated effort involving various specialties and better outcomes are likely to be achieved with centralization of expertise at regional centers.

Limb salvage in musculoskeletal oncology: Recent advances

The treatment of musculoskeletal sarcomas has made vast strides in the last few decades. From an era where amputation was the only option to the current day function preserving resections and complex reconstructions has been a major advance. The objectives of extremity reconstruction after oncologic resection include providing skeletal stability where necessary, adequate wound coverage to allow early subsequent adjuvant therapy, optimising the aesthetic outcome and preservation of functional capability with early return to function. This article highlights the concepts of surgical margins in oncology, discusses the principles governing safe surgical resection in these tumors and summarises the current modalities and recent developments relevant to reconstruction after limb salvage. The rationale of choice of a particular resection modality, the unique challenges of reconstruction in skeletally immature individuals and the impact of adjuvant modalities like chemotherapy and radiotherapy on surgical outcomes are also discussed.

Frozen section versus gross examination for bone marrow margin assessment during sarcoma resection

BACKGROUND

Complete resection is critical for local control of primary bone sarcomas. Intraoperative consultation, including frozen section of bone marrow margins, frequently is used to aid in this goal.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We therefore sought to determine (1) how often intraoperative frozen section of a bone marrow margin correlates with inspection of the gross split specimen and, in cases of a discrepancy, what clinical decision is made; and (2) how well each of these assessments agrees with the final pathologic assessment of a marrow margin.

METHODS

One hundred ninety-five bone marrow margins from 142 patients (74 males, 68 females; mean age, 12.8 years) with primary sarcomas who underwent resection and had frozen section(s) performed on a bone marrow margin were analyzed. Agreement between frozen section interpretation and inspection of the split gross specimen was analyzed in their application to determine adequacy of the bone marrow margin intraoperatively.

RESULTS

In 179 margins, the frozen section agreed with the gross inspection decision (95.6% negative agreement, 38.5% positive agreement). Decisions regarding further surgical action in all 16 instances of disagreement were based on inspection of the split gross specimen, and the frozen section was disregarded. In 195 of 195 margins, intraoperative decisions were made based on gross specimen inspection. Full pathologic examination confirmed negative final bone marrow margins in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Frozen section is commonly redundant or disregarded for intraoperative surgical decisions, and it may be omitted, saving operative time and cost. Examination of split gross specimens appears an adequate adjunct to clinicoradiographic assessment to achieve negative margins in the current era of modern imaging and surgical techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, diagnostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Computer-aided resection and endoprosthesis design for the management of malignant bone tumors around the knee: outcomes of 12 cases

Background

To report the outcomes of computer-aided resection and endoprosthesis design for the management of malignant bone tumors around the knee.

Methods

Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data were input into computer software to produce three-dimensional (3D) models of the tumor extent. Imaging data was then used to create a template for surgical resection, and development of an individualized combined allogeneic bone/endoprosthesis. Surgical simulations were performed prior to the actual surgery.

Results

This study included 9 males and 3 females with a mean age of 25.3 years (range, 13 to 40 years). There were 9 tumors in the distal femur and 3 in the proximal tibia. There were no surgical complications. In all cases pathologically confirmed clear surgical margins were obtained. Postoperative radiographs showed the range of tumor resection was in accordance with the preoperative design, and the morphological reconstruction of the bone defect was satisfactory with complete bilateral symmetry. The mean follow-up time was 26.5 months. Two patients died of their disease and the remaining are alive and well without evidence of recurrence. All patients are able to ambulate freely without restrictions. At the last follow-up, the average International Society of Limb Salvage score was 25.8 (range, 18 to 27), and was excellent in 8 cases and good in 4 cases.

Conclusions

Computer-aided design and modeling for the surgical management of bone tumors and subsequent limb reconstruction provides accurate tumor removal with the salvage of a maximal amount of unaffected bone and precise endoprosthesis reconstruction.

How intraoperative navigation is changing musculoskeletal tumor surgery

Computer-assisted orthopedic surgery (CAOS) was introduced, developed, and implemented in musculoskeletal tumor surgery recently to enhance surgical precision in resecting malignant and benign tumors. The origins of computer-assisted surgery were in other subspecialties including maxillofacial surgery, spine surgery, and arthroplasty. Early studies have shown that CAOS can also be used safely for bone tumor resection surgery. Additional technological improvements may allow use of CAOS in soft tissue tumor surgery. It has the potential to improve surgical precision and accuracy, but more study is needed to evaluate clinical efficacy and long term results.

Percutaneous navigation surgery of osteoid osteoma of the femur neck

Surgery on benign bone tumors such as osteoid osteoma does not necessarily require bone exposure through a surgical incision. In most reported cases of the osteoid osteoma resection through computer-assisted surgery, registration and surgery were performed by exposing the bone. We have succeeded in performing percutaneous registration and navigated burr excision of the osteoid osteoma using computer-assisted navigation.

Potential use of computer navigation in the treatment of primary benign and malignant tumors in children

The treatment of benign and malignant primary bone tumors has progressed over time from relatively simple practice to complex resection and reconstruction techniques. Recently, computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery (CAOS) has been used to assist surgeons to enhance surgical precision in order to achieve these goals. Initially, software developed for CT-based spinal applications was used to perform simple intraoperative point localization. With advances in technique and software design, oncology surgeons have now performed joint sparing complex multiplanar osteotomies using combined CT and MRI image data with precision and accuracy. The purpose of this paper is to provide a review of the clinical progress to date, the different types of navigation available, methods for error management, and limitations of CAOS in the treatment of pediatric benign and malignant primary bone tumors.

Effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on image-directed planning of surgical resection for distal femoral osteosarcoma

BACKGROUND

Standard therapy for localized osteosarcoma includes neoadjuvant chemotherapy preceding local control surgery, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. When limb-salvage procedures were being developed, preoperative chemotherapy allowed a delay in definitive surgery to permit fabrication of custom endoprosthetic reconstruction implants. One rationale for its continuation as the care standard has been the perception that it renders surgery easier and safer. Our objective was to compare surgical procedures planned on the basis of magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of distal femoral osteosarcomas acquired before neoadjuvant chemotherapy with surgical procedures planned on the basis of MRIs acquired after neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a measure of the surgically critical anatomic effects of the chemotherapy.

METHODS

Twenty-four consecutive patients with distal femoral osteosarcoma had available digital MRIs preceding and following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Thorough questionnaires were used to catalogue surgically critical anatomic details of MRI-directed surgical planning. Four faculty musculoskeletal oncologic surgeons and two musculoskeletal radiologists evaluated the blinded and randomly ordered MRIs. Interrater and intrarater reliabilities were calculated with intraclass correlation coefficients. The Student t test and chi-square test were used to compare pre-chemotherapy and post-chemotherapy continuous and categorical variables on the questionnaire. Mixed-effect regression models were employed to compare surgical procedures planned on the basis of pre-chemotherapy MRIs and with those planned on the basis of post-chemotherapy MRIs.

RESULTS

The blinded reviews generated strong intraclass correlation coefficients for both interrater (0.772) and mean intrarater (0.778) reliability. The MRI-planned resections for the majority of tumors changed meaningfully after chemotherapy, but in inconsistent directions. On the basis of mixed-effect regression modeling, it appeared that more amputations were planned on the basis of post-chemotherapy MRIs. No other parameters differed in a significant and clinically meaningful fashion. Surgeons demonstrated their expectation that neoadjuvant chemotherapy would improve resectability by planning more radical surgical procedures on the basis of scans that they predicted had been obtained pre-chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons can reliably record the anatomic details of a planned resection of an osteosarcoma. Such methods may be useful in future multi-institutional clinical trials or registries. The common belief that neoadjuvant chemotherapy increases the resectability of extremity osteosarcomas remains anecdotally based. Rigorous assessment of this phenomenon in larger cohorts and at other anatomic sites as well as re-evaluation of other arguments for neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be considered.

Current concepts in surgical treatment of osteosarcoma

Osteosarcoma is the most common malignant primary neoplasm of bone. For an optimal oncological outcome, surgical removal of tumor is an essential component of its multidisciplinary treatment. Limb salvage surgery has long been established as the standard of care for osteosarcoma. While limb-salvaging techniques have acceptable rates of disease control, amputation remains a valid procedure in selected cases. In current orthopedic oncology practice, the focus is on optimizing the balance between preservation of form and function of the limb and adequate oncological clearance at the same time. Improving the functional outcome and longevity of reconstructive procedures also remains a challenge.

Irregular osteotomy in limb salvage for juxta-articular osteosarcoma under computer-assisted navigation

BACKGROUND

Joint-preserving limb salvage surgery has been expected to have good functional outcomes. However, it is still a unsolved problem to perform a joint preserving resection for patients with juxta-articular osteosarcoma invading epiphyseal line. We determined whether irregular osteotomy under image-guided navigation make joint-saving resection possible for juxta-articular osteosarcoma while adhering oncological principles.

METHODS

We performed joint-preserving limb salvage surgeries on six patients with juxta-articular osteosarcoma of the long bone. Three lesions located in humerus, two in tibia and one in femur. Two tumors extend to and four beyond the epiphyseal line. CT and MRI data fusion images were applied for intraoperative navigation. Planned irregular osteotomy under image-guided navigation was employed for obtaining clear surgical margin while maximizing host tissue preservation. All tumors were en bloc removed and intercalary defect were reconstructed by allograft in one and combination of allograft with vascularized fibula graft in five patients. All specimens were examined for resection margin. Patients were followed up for average of 17.5 months for evaluating of functional and oncology outcomes.

RESULT

Entire joint were preserved in three patients and part of joint were saved in another three patients. Clear surgical margin was obtained in all specimens with a minimum of 6-mm distance between tumor and osteotomy line. No patient experienced a local recurrence. One patient developed lung metastasis and had no evidence of disease at the most recent follow-up. All allografts but one healed during the study period. The MSTS average score was 88.8% at final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

With careful patient selection, the irregular osteotomy under navigation guidance was proved to be an effective and safe technique for precise tumor resection in joint preserving limb salvage procedures for treating patients with juxta-articular osteosarcomas.

A signal-inducing bone cement for magnetic resonance imaging-guided spinal surgery based on hydroxyapatite and polymethylmethacrylate

The aim of this study was to develop a signal-inducing bone cement for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided cementoplasty of the spine. This MRI cement would allow precise and controlled injection of cement into pathologic lesions of the bone. We mixed conventional polymethylmethacrylate bone cement (PMMA; 5 ml methylmethacrylate and 12 g polymethylmethacrylate) with hydroxyapatite (HA) bone substitute (2-4 ml) and a gadolinium-based contrast agent (CA; 0-60 μl). The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of different CA doses was measured in an open 1.0-Tesla scanner for fast T1W Turbo-Spin-Echo (TSE) and T1W TSE pulse sequences to determine the highest signal. We simulated MRI-guided cementoplasty in cadaveric spines. Compressive strength of the cements was tested. The highest CNR was (1) 87.3 (SD 2.9) in fast T1W TSE for cements with 4 μl CA/ml HA (4 ml) and (2) 60.8 (SD 2.4) in T1W TSE for cements with 1 μl CA/ml HA (4 ml). MRI-guided cementoplasty in cadaveric spine was feasible. Compressive strength decreased with increasing amounts of HA from 46.7 MPa (2 ml HA) to 28.0 MPa (4 ml HA). An MRI-compatible cement based on PMMA, HA, and CA is feasible and clearly visible on MRI images. MRI-guided spinal cementoplasty using this cement would permit direct visualization of the cement, the pathologic process, and the anatomical surroundings.

Direct application of MR images to computer-assisted bone tumor surgery

BACKGROUND

We describe a method for the direct application of MR images to navigation-assisted bone tumor surgery as an alternative to CT-MRI fusion.

METHOD

Six patients with an orthopedic malignancy were employed for this method during navigation-assisted tumor resection. Tumor types included osteosarcoma (4), high-grade chondrosarcoma (1), and adamantinoma (1). Mean patient age was 25.3 years (range 18-52 years). Mean duration of follow-up was 25.8 months (range 18-32 months). Resorbable pin placement and rapid 3-dimensional spoiled gradient echo sequences made the direct application of MR images to computer-assisted bone tumor surgery without CT-MR image fusion possible. A paired-point registration technique was employed for patient-image registration in all patients.

RESULTS

It took 20 min on average to set up the navigation (range 15-25 min). The mean registration error was 0.98 mm (range 0.4-1.7 mm). On histologic examination, distances from tumors to resection margins were in accord with preoperative plans. No patient had a local recurrence or distant metastasis at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Direct patient-to-MRI registration is a very useful method for bone tumor surgery, permitting the application of MR images to intraoperative visualization without any additional costs or exposure of the patient to radiation from the preoperative CT scan.