Do large heads enhance stability and restore native anatomy in primary total hip arthroplasty?

The economical and reliable image free navigation system for acetabular cup implantation in total hip arthroplasty

Background

Achieving precise acetabular cup positioning is vital for the success of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Factors such as cup inclination and anteversion angles play a pivotal role in determining postoperative stability, limb length equality, and overall functional outcomes. Modern navigation systems and robotics have enhanced surgical precision but remain underutilized due to their high costs and complex training requirements.

Methods

We have designed an economical and compact image-free navigation device for acetabular cup placement. By employing computer vision techniques using OpenCV, the device was tested on artificial hip models to ensure precision. A total of 50 angle measurements were analyzed for accuracy.

Results

The tool demonstrated exceptional precision, with mean inclination angle errors of 0.15° (SD: 0.44°) and mean anteversion angle errors of -1.06° (SD: 0.34°), both statistically significant (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Our navigation device, which is portable and cost-effective, offers reliable guidance for acetabular cup positioning. Its affordability and ease of use make it an excellent alternative for resource-constrained settings.

Dual-Mobility Articulations in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Mid-Term Outcomes From the American Joint Replacement Registry

BACKGROUND

In recent years, there has been an increased utilization of dual-mobility (DM) implants in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) to mitigate the risk of postoperative hip instability. This study aimed to present mid-term outcomes of DM bearings in primary THA using data from the American Joint Replacement Registry.

METHODS

Screening was conducted on patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent primary THA between 2012 and 2018. Patients were categorized into three groups: (1) DM articulation, (2) ≤ 32-mm femoral head, and (3) ≥ 36-mm femoral head. Multivariable statistical modeling was employed to analyze patient and hospital characteristics, minimizing potential confounding variables and identifying independent associations with revision. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to assess all-cause revision and revision specifically for instability. A total of 207,526 primary THAs were identified. Among them, 13,896 (6.7%) utilized DM articulation, 60,358 (29.1%) had a femoral head size of ≤ 32 mm, and 133,272 (64.2%) had a femoral head size of ≥ 36 mm.

RESULTS

At the 8-year follow-up, the all-cause revision rate was higher in the DM group (3.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.1 to 4.1) compared to the ≤ 32-mm (2.6%, 95% CI 2.5 to 2.8) and ≥ 36-mm (2.7%, 95% CI 2.5 to 2.9) groups. However, the revision rate for instability was comparable among the DM (0.4%, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.5), ≤ 32 mm (0.5%, 95% CI 0.4 to 0.5), and ≥ 36 mm (0.3%, 95% CI 0.3 to 0.4) groups at 8-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The utilization of DM was associated with higher overall revision rates. However, no significant differences in rates of revision for instability were observed among any of the bearing surface groups. These findings may be attributed to surgeons selectively utilizing DM articulations in higher-risk patients.

Does Femoral Head Size Matter? A Comparison of 32-, 36-, and 40-Millimeter Heads in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: An American Joint Replacement Registry Analysis

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown that increased femoral head size reduces the risk of dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), but there has been limited research on femoral head sizes greater than 36 mm.

METHODS

The American Joint Replacement Registry was utilized to evaluate all primary THA cases in Medicare patients aged 65 years and older who had a femoral head size of 32, 36, or ≥ 40 mm between 2012 and 2020. Patients who received a ≥ 40-mm head were more likely to be men and had a higher Charlson comorbidity index (CCI, P < 0.001). Multivariate analyses were performed to adjust for age, sex, race, femoral head composition, and CCI. Cox's proportional hazards models were used to compare differences in revision between groups.

RESULTS

Of 319,531 total THA cases, 84,524 (26.4%) used a 32 mm, 211,814 (66.3%) used a 36 mm, and 23,193 (7.3%) used ≥ 40-mm femoral head. When compared to 32-mm heads, 36-mm heads had significantly lower rates of revision for dislocation (32 mm: 0.68%, 36 mm: 0.46%, P < 0.001). Femoral heads ≥ 40 mm were not associated with a decreased rate of revision for dislocation (0.51%) when compared to 32 and 36 mm heads. However, femoral heads ≥ 40 mm were associated with an increased risk of all-cause revision (32 mm: 2.55%, 36 mm: 2.37%, 40 mm: 2.78%, P < 0.001) and revision for infection (32 mm: 0.43%, 36 mm: 0.53%, 40 mm: 0.82%, P < 0.001) compared to 32 and 36 mm heads.

CONCLUSIONS

Large femoral heads (≥ 40 mm) do not decrease revision for dislocation in primary THA but were associated with an increased risk of all-cause revision and revision for infection. Although demographic and comorbidity variables were controlled in our multivariate analysis, more men and higher CCI in ≥ 40-mm head patients may represent a population with a greater presurgical risk for complications. More research on ≥ 40-mm heads is warranted before widespread adoption.

Excellent Results of Large-Diameter Ceramic-On-Ceramic Bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty at Minimum Ten-Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

This study reports the minimum 10 years results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed using a monoblock acetabular component with a large-diameter head ceramic-on-ceramic bearing.

METHODS

Of the 276 THAs included in this study, there were eleven deaths and 27 patients lost to follow up (11%) during the follow-up, leaving 237 (85%) hips available for review at a mean of 10.5 years (range, 10 to 12) postoperatively. Reoperations, implant revisions, adverse events, clinical outcomes, radiographic evaluation, and whole blood metal ion levels were assessed at the last follow-up.

RESULTS

After a minimum of 10 years, implant survivorship was 98.7%. There were 3 revisions (1.3%): one for insufficient acetabular cup primary fixation, one traumatic periprosthetic acetabular fracture, and one probable deep chronic infection. No dislocation or ceramic implant fracture was observed. The mean University of California at Los Angeles activity score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score, and Forgotten Joint Score were 5.6 (2 to 10), 90.1 (9 to 100), and 79.2 (4 to 100), respectively. All patients (100%) were satisfied or very satisfied. Since implantation, 43% of patients reported hearing a squeaking noise from the prosthesis. But all patients who reported squeaking were satisfied with the surgery. The mean titanium level was 2.2 μg/L (1.1 to 5.6). No progressive radiolucent lines, osteolysis, or implant loosening signs were observed at the last radiographic evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

A large-diameter head ceramic-on-ceramic THA provides outstanding long-term (minimum 10 years) implant survivorship with unrestricted activity while avoiding implant impingement, liner fracture, and hip instability. Functional outcomes, satisfaction, and joint perception were excellent. Although the incidence of squeaking was high, it did not affect patient satisfaction or function. The systemic titanium levels were low, related to unavoidable passive corrosion of implant surfaces, and did not reveal any indirect signs of trunnionosis.

Using preoperative planning software to assess the effect of head length on prosthetic range of motion in a high-risk population: a three-dimensional modeling study

PURPOSE

Concurrent use of minus heads with tapered stems in total hip arthroplasty (THA) decreases the prosthetic range of motion (pROM). Three-dimensional preoperative templating can simulate the location of the impingement by taking the hip through a virtual pROM. This enables surgeons to simulate how modifying the type of implant, orientation, and position influences impingement. We hypothesized that CT-based modeling would result in a decrease in the pROM, thereby increasing the risk of impingement when minus heads are used.

METHODS

Forty-three patients who underwent robotic-assisted primary THAs were included. Prosthetic head diameter (32/36-mm) and head length (minus/zero/plus) were the predictors. Maximum external rotation at full hip extension and internal rotation at 90° and 100° of flexion prior to prosthetic impingement were the outcome variables. A CT-based preoperative planning software was used for pROM estimation and impingement detection.

RESULTS

Significant decreases in pROM were found for both head diameters as the head length decreased and was more pronounced in external rotation during full hip extension (changes of 2.8-3.4° for the 32-mm head and 1.6-2.8° for the 36-mm head (p = 0.00011)). The magnitude of loss in pROM when using a minus head was larger than the gain provided by a plus head in tapered stems (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Head length affects the offset and pROM. When the use of minus heads or smaller heads is indicated, 3D preoperative templating for assessing postoperative pROM and impingement provides surgeons with options to consider alternate surgical plans offering additional assurance and protection from dislocation.

Head size in Delta ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty: a comparative registry study

INTRODUCTION

Optimal bearing size in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has not been clearly ascertained, but large diameter ceramic balls may improve function and implant stability, with minimal concerns for wear. Delta ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) THA were stratified based on head diameter (32, 36 and 40 mm), aiming to assess: 1) survival rates, reasons for revision and hazard ratios for failure; 2) survival rates and hazard ratios for aseptic loosening, dislocation/primary instability, liner failure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A regional arthroplasty registry was enquired about Delta COC THA performed for primary osteoarthritis, stratified by head size. 13,161 primary cementless THAs were included in the study, with a mean follow-up of 5.7 years (range: 0-17): 3980 (30.2%) 32 mm balls, 8327 (63.3%) 36 mm heads, 854 (6.5%) 40 mm heads.

RESULTS

The three cohorts achieved similar survival rates (p = 0.99) and adjusted hazard ratios (p > 0.05). No revisions for head breakage or metallosis occurred. When revision for cup aseptic loosening was the endpoint, the survival rates of three cohorts (p = 0.08) and the adjusted hazard ratios (p > 0.05) were similar. The three cohorts achieved comparable survival rates when revision for dislocation/primary instability was the endpoint (p = 0.08). When the endpoint was revision for liner breakage, 32 mm cohort showed higher rates of revision (p = 0.01). No liner failure was detected in the 40 mm cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

32 mm, 36 mm and 40 mm provided similar 10-year survival rates in Delta COC THA. 40 mm heads emerged as safe options but did not lower the revisions for dislocations/primary instability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV (therapeutic study).

Does-dual mobility still offer improved stability in smaller cup sizes? A computer modelling comparison of stability with 22-mm versus 28-mm inner heads in dual-mobility versus single-bearing constructs

PURPOSE

Dislocation remains 1 of the leading causes of revision after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and there is clear evidence the dual-mobility (DM) is used more frequently to minimise this. But in smaller cups, whether the use of DM with smaller 22-mm heads imparts any increased stability compared to standard bearing is unknown; especially when those smaller cups now allow for large single-bearing (SB) heads.

METHODS

3 primary cup sizes (48 mm, 50 mm, 52 mm) were chosen a priori for modelling. Head sizes trialled for the standard bearing (SB) constructs group were 28-0 mm, 32-0 mm and 36-0 mm against neutral polyethylene liners. In the modular sub-hemispheric DM constructs the inner head sizes for the DM constructs were altered where appropriate (22-0 mm vs. 28-0 mm). Cup position, stem offset, and stem size were standardised.

RESULTS

Both DM constructs outperformed all SB constructs because of a statistically significant jump distance increase (p < 0.001). However, there was no difference in range of motion (ROM) or jump distances between the 22-mm and 28-mm DM inner heads.The ROM angle before impingement between the DM (with 22-mm or 28-mm heads) and SB (with different head sizes where appropriate) showed no statistically significant difference. However, DM constructs presented significantly larger jump distances than SB constructs for both provocative dislocation tests across all 3 cup sizes.Of interest, for 50-mm and 52-mm cup sizes (for which this particular DM construct design can accommodate both 22-mm and 28-mm inner heads), there were no differences in ROM or jump distance between 22-mm versus 28-mm inner heads.

CONCLUSIONS

In this computer-modelling study, DM constructs are advantageous over SB constructs for improving jump distances in clinically provocative positions, but not range of motion angles. Inner head diameter of DM has no effect on stability.

A new seven-axis robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty system improves component positioning: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study

This study compared the radiologic and clinical outcomes of a new seven-axis robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) and conventional THA. Hundred and four patients were randomly assigned to two groups-the robotic-assisted THA group (RAS group) and the conventional THA group (CON group). The preoperative and postoperative Harris Hip score (HHS), acetabular inclination, anteversion, femoral offset, and leg length discrepancy (LLD) were compared. During the follow-up, no patients had any complications that could be associated with the use of the robot. The proportion of acetabular cups in the safety zone was significantly higher in the RAS group than that in the CON group. The two groups had significantly different mean absolute difference of inclination and anteversion. There was no significant difference in the postoperative HHSs, changes in HHSs, femoral offset, and lower limb length between the two groups. The seven-axis robotic-assisted THA system is safe and effective, and leads to better acetabulum cup positioning compared to conventional THA. The improvements observed in the HHS, LLD, and femoral offset in the RAS group were similar to those in the CON group.Clinical trial registration time: 19/05/2022.Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR2200060115.

Total hip arthroplasty with monobloc press-fit acetabular components and large-diameter bearings for atypical acetabula is safe: a consecutive case series of 125 hips with mean follow-up of 9 years

BACKGROUND

Large-diameter head (LDH) total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a monobloc acetabular component improves hip stability. However, obtaining initial press-fit stability is quite challenging in atypical acetabula. The purpose of this study was to assess primary and secondary fixation of monobloc cups in atypical acetabula.

METHODS

In this consecutive case series, the local arthroplasty database was used to retrospectively identify patients with secondary osteoarthritis who underwent primary hip replacement with press-fit only LDH monobloc acetabular components between 2005 and 2018 and who had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Radiographic evaluation was performed at last follow-up, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), and the Patient's Joint Perception (PJP) question.

RESULTS

One hundred and six LDH THAs and 19 hip resurfacings were included in the study. Preoperative diagnoses included hip dysplasia (36.8%), Legg-Calve-Perthes disease (32.0%), osteoarthritis with acetabular deficiency (17.6%), periacetabular osteotomy (8.0%), arthrodesis (4.0%), and osteopetrosis (1.6%). After a mean follow-up of 9.2 years, no aseptic loosening of the acetabular component was recorded nor observed on radiologic review. There were 13 (10.4%) revisions unrelated to the acetabular component fixation. The mean WOMAC and FJS scores were 9.2 and 80.9, respectively. In response to the PJP question, 49.4% of the patients perceived their hip as natural, 19.1% as an artificial joint with no restriction, 31.5% as an artificial joint with restriction, and none as a non-functional joint.

CONCLUSION

Primary press-fit fixation of monobloc acetabular components with LDH implanted in atypical acetabula led to secondary fixation in all cases with low revision and complication rates and great functional outcomes. With careful surgical technique and experience, systematic use of supplemental screw fixation is not essential in THA with atypical acetabula.

Did the dislocation risk after primary total hip arthroplasty decrease over time? A meta-analysis across six decades

BACKGROUND

While continuous optimization is attempted to decrease the incidence of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA), dislocation remains a major complication. This meta-analysis aims to analyze the evolution of the dislocation risk after primary THA over the decades and to evaluate its potential publication bias.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A systematic search was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines for this meta-analysis in the literature published between 1962 and 2020. MEDLINE, Cochrane and Embase databases were searched for studies reporting the dislocation risk and length of follow-up. Studies that reported on revision rates only and did not mention separate dislocations were excluded. All study designs were eligible. Study quality was assessed by existing quality assessment tools adjusted for arthroplasty research. Overall risk and yearly dislocation rates were calculated and related to historical time frame, study design, sample size and length of follow-up.

RESULTS

In total, 174 studies were included with an overall moderate quality. In total there were 85.209 dislocations reported in 5.030.293 THAs, showing an overall dislocation risk of 1.7%, with a median follow-up of 24 months. The overall dislocation risk classified per decade decreased from 3.7% in 1960-1970 to 0.7% in 2010-2020. The yearly dislocation rate decreased from 1.8 to 0.7% within these same decades. There was no significant correlation between the reported dislocation risk and the duration of follow-up (p = 0.903) or sample size (p = 0.755). The reported dislocation risk was higher in articles with registry data compared to other study designs (p = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

The dislocation risk in THA has been decreasing over the past decades to 0.7%. Non-selective registry studies reported a higher dislocation risk compared to studies with selective cohorts and RCTs. This indicates that the actual dislocation risk is higher than often reported and 'real-world data' are reflected better in large-scale cohorts and registries.

No difference in whole-blood metal ions between 32-mm and 36- to 44-mm femoral heads in metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty: a 2-year report from a randomised control trial

AIM

To investigate the effect of femoral head size on blood metal-ion levels caused by taper corrosion in metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty, comparing 36- to 44-mm heads with 32-mm heads.

METHODS

In a randomised, controlled, single-blinded trial, 96 patients were allocated to receive either a 32-mm metal head or the largest possible metal head (36-44 mm) that could be accommodated in the thinnest available vitamin E, cross-linked polyethylene insert. Blood metal ion levels were collected at 1- and 2-year follow-ups.

RESULTS

At 1-year, metal-ion levels did not differ between the groups. The median (interquartile range) blood-ion levels for the 32-mm versus the 36- to 44-mm group were 0.11 µg/L (0.08-0.15) versus 0.12 µg/L (0.08-0.22), p = 0.546, for cobalt, 0.50 µg/L (0.50-0.59) versus 0.50 µg/L (0.50-1.20), p = 0.059, for chromium and 1.58 µg/L (1.38-2.05) versus 1.48 µg/L (1.14-1.87), p = 0.385, for titanium. At 2 years, there was no difference either and the corresponding values were 0.15 µg/L (0.12-0.24) versus 0.18 µg/L (0.12-0.28), p = 0.682 for cobalt, 0.50 µg/L (0.50-0.50) versus 0.50 µg/L (0.50-0.57), p = 0.554, for chromium and 1.54 µg/L (1.16-1.87) versus 1.42 µg/L (1.01-1.72), p = 0.207 for titanium.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the largest possible metal head (36-44 mm) compared to a 32-mm head in metal-on-polyethylene bearings does not appear to elevate blood metal-ion levels up to 2 years postoperatively. As taper corrosion is probably time-dependent, longer-term reports are needed to evaluate the association between large metal heads and blood metal ion levels.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (reg. ID NCT0231 6704).

Metal-on-Metal Hips: Ten-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of the ADEPT Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing and Modular Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to update the 10-year follow-up survivorship and metal ions levels of a cohort of metal-on-metal (MoM) hip resurfacing (HR) and large-diameter-head (LDH) total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

The study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data that compared the outcomes of 24 MoM HR (21 patients) and 15 (11 patients) modular LHD MoM THA at >10 years follow-up. Baseline characteristics as well as intraoperative and postoperative information were collected, including complications, revisions, clinical and radiographic outcomes, and serum metal ions level (Cobalt, Chromium). Metal ion levels were compared using a two-tailed unpaired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test (jamovi v2.3.3.0, Sydney, NSW, AU).

RESULTS

No significant differences were detected in gender, BMI, and ASA score between the two groups. Patients in the modular THA group were significantly older (57 years vs. 46 years; p < 0.05). The HR overall survivorship was 91.7% (22 of 24 hips) with survivorship from implant failure and/or aseptic loosening and/or metal debris related 100% of problems. The modular THA overall survivorship was 86.7% (13 of 15 hips) with survivorship from implant aseptic loosening and metal ions complications of 93.4% (14 of 15 hips). No significant difference was noted when comparing clinical outcomes. Metal ions were significantly lower in the HR group (Co 25.8 nmol/L vs. 89 nmol/L; p < 0.001-Cr 33.5 nmol/L vs. 55.2 nmol/L; p = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

Both implants reported excellent and comparable clinical outcomes at >10 years follow-up. The Adept HR reported remarkable survivorship, in line with the registry data, proving once again its reliability in young active males. The modular LDH THA, despite being discontinued, presented higher reliability and a lower failure rate when compared with similar withdrawn MoM implants. Trunnionosis did not appear to be a significant problem in this particular modular design.

Сomparative analysis of large diameter bearing ceramic monoblock acetabular components

Introduction

The goal of total hip arthroplasty (THA) is to provide ease to patients with persistent and exhausting pain. Durability is the main challenge associated with any tribological pair, with the aim of minimizing wear and thus avoiding problems with aseptic loosening of components and osteolysis. When polyethylene inserts are used in young patients, we should always consider their disadvantages, e.g., increased wear of the interacting components. Proper selection of friction pairs allows prolonged implant life. Ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) friction pairs should provide long-term wear of the friction components.

Objectives

To evaluate the mid-term results of using the monoblock Maxera Cup (Zimmer Biomet) acetabular system in cementless THA.

Methods

We operated on 151 patients using the monoblock Maxera Cup (Zimmer Biomet) acetabular system. The mean follow-up duration was 6 years (73.8 ± 11.7 months). Fifty-seven women and 94 men aged 19-64 years were surgically treated. All 170 THA cases in 151 patients were divided into 3 groups according to the diameters of the CoC friction pairs used (40, 44, and 48 mm). As a control group, we have taken 50 patients who received 50 THA using a standard 36 mm CoC friction pair. The achieved functional results were evaluated using the HHS scale, WOMAC scale, and SF36 scale. We also evaluated the mean duration of surgical intervention and blood loss.

Results

When assessing long-term results, the average HHS significantly increased from 34.10 (before surgery) to 87.50 (postoperation) points in the 1st group, from 46.24 to 96.5 points in the 2nd group, and from 38.70 to 92.10 points in the 3rd group. From preoperative examination to 1 year after surgery, there was a 2.4-fold improvement in the functional results in group 1 and 1,8 and 2.9 -fold improvement in groups 2 and 3, indicating excellent treatment results. Inconsistent creaking in the implanted joint was noted in only 2.6% of cases in which a CoC friction pair with a diameter of 44 mm was used. We did not observe any complications associated with aseptic or septic loosening of the components either clinically or radiologically during the 7-year follow-up period after surgery in the entire patient population.

Conclusions

1Use of the CoC monoblock allowed us to expect an increase in the life cycle of the implant and provided good joint function and perception by the patient.2Monoblock cups provided good joint function and perception by the patient.3Acoustic effects, in the form of minor creaking, did not affect the functional results.

Small Random Angular Variations in Pelvic Tilt and Lower Extremity Can Cause Error in Static Image-based Preoperative Hip Arthroplasty Planning: A Computer Modeling Study

BACKGROUND

Many THA simulation models rely on a limited set of preoperative static radiographs to replicate sagittal pelvic tilt during functional positions and to recommend an implant orientation that minimizes the risk of prosthetic impingement. However, possible random changes in pelvic or lower extremity angular motions and the effect of coronal and axial pelvic tilt are not included in these preoperative models.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Can prosthetic impingement occur if the pelvic tilt or lower extremity alignment randomly varies up to ± 5° from what is measured on a single preoperative static radiographic image? (2) Do changes in coronal and axial pelvic tilt or lower extremity alignment angles have a similar effect on the risk of prosthetic impingement?

METHODS

A de-identified pelvis and lower-body CT image of a male patient without previous THA or lower extremity surgery was used to import the pelvis, femur, and tibia into a verified MATLAB computer model. The motions of standing, pivoting, sitting, sit-to-stand, squatting, and bending forward were simulated. THA implant components included a full hemispherical acetabular cup without an elevated rim, polyethylene liner without an elevated rim, femoral head (diameter: 28 mm, 32 mm, 36 mm, or 40 mm), and a triple-taper cementless stem with three different neck shaft angles (127°, 132°, or 135°) with a trapezoidal neck were used in this model. A static model (cup anatomical abduction 40°, cup anatomical anteversion 20°, stem anatomical anteversion 10°) with a predefined range of sagittal pelvic tilt and hip alignment (0° coronal or axial tilt, without random ± 5° change) was used to simulate each motion. We then randomly varied pelvic tilt in three different pelvic planes and hip alignments (flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, rotation) up to ± 5° and assessed the same motions without changing the implant's anatomical orientation. Prosthetic impingement as the endpoint was defined as mechanical abutment between the prosthetic neck and polyethylene liner. Multiple logistic regression was used to investigate the effect of variation in pelvic tilt and hip alignment (predictors) on prosthetic impingement (primary outcome).

RESULTS

The static-based model without the random variation did not result in any prosthetic impingement under any conditions. However, with up to ± 5° of random variation in the pelvic tilt and hip alignment angles, prosthetic impingement occurred in pivoting (18 possible combinations), sit-to-stand (106 possible combinations), and squatting (one possible combination) when a 28-mm or a 32-mm head was used. Variation in sagittal tilt (odds ratio 4.09 [95% CI 3.11 to 5.37]; p < 0.001), axial tilt (OR 3.87 [95% CI 2.96 to 5.07]; p < 0.001), and coronal tilt (OR 2.39 [95% CI 2.03 to 2.83]; p < 0.001) affected the risk of prosthetic impingement. Variation in hip flexion had a strong impact on the risk of prosthetic impingement (OR 4.11 [95% CI 3.38 to 4.99]; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The combined effect of 2° to 3° of change in multiple pelvic tilt or hip alignment angles relative to what is measured on a single static radiographic image can result in prosthetic impingement. Relying on a few preoperative static radiographic images to minimize the risk of prosthetic impingement, without including femoral implant orientation, axial and coronal pelvic tilt, and random angular variation in pelvis and lower extremity alignment, may not be adequate and may fail to predict prosthetic impingement-free ROM.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Determining a safe zone for THA implant positioning with respect to impingement may require a dynamic computer simulation model to fully capture the range of possible impingement conditions. Future work should concentrate on devising simple and easily available methods for dynamic motion analysis instead of using a few static radiographs for preoperative planning.

Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: does head size really matter?

INTRODUCTION

Recent advances in polyethylene and ceramic technologies has allowed us to use larger sized heads without compromising the wear properties of a total hip arthroplasty (THA). 1 benefit of this change has been proposed to be a lower incidence of dislocation.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the dislocation rate in 913 THAs performed using the same standardised surgical technique employed by a single team of surgeons at our institution between 1995 and 2015. Patients were assigned to 2 groups: small (⩽28 mm), large diameter heads (⩾36 mm and larger). The cup position was measured and plotted to determine its status according to the Lewinnek's safe zone (15° ± 10° for anteversion, 40° ± 10° for inclination).

RESULTS

16 of the 472 small heads dislocated (3.4%) while 5 of the 441 in large head group (1.1%) (p = 0.04). In all of the large head patients that dislocated the cup position was in the safe range of Lewinnek. However, in the large head group only 64.5% of the cups were in the safe zone.

CONCLUSIONS

By changing the head size to 36 mm, we were able to decrease the dislocation rate significantly. Errors of cup positioning according to Lewinnek became oblivious when using large heads. In our opinion, using large heads in THA makes a difference in terms of dislocation.

Despite higher revision rate, MoM large-head THA offers better clinical scores than HR: 14-year results from a randomized controlled trial involving 48 patients

BACKGROUND

The high failure rates of metal on metal (MoM) large diameter head total hip arthroplasty (LDH THA) and hip resurfacing (HR) prevented their long-term comparisons with regards to clinical outcome. Such knowledge would be important as ceramic LDH bearing is now available. With long-term follow-up, we investigated the difference in 1) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs); 2) revision and adverse events rates, and 3) metal ion levels between MoM LDH THA and HR.

METHODS

Forty-eight patients were randomized for LDH THA (24) or HR (24) with the same MoM articulation. At a mean follow-up of 14 years, we compared between groups different PROMs, the number of revisions and adverse events, whole blood Cobalt (Co) and Chromium (Cr) ion levels, and radiographic signs of implant dysfunction.

RESULTS

LDH THA (all cases: revised and well-functioning) had significantly better WOMAC (94 versus 85, p = 0.04), and more frequently reported having no limitation (p = 0.04). LDH THA revision rate was 20.8% (5/24) versus 8.3% (2/24) for HR (p = 0.4). Mean Co and Cr ion levels were higher in LDH THA compared to the HR (Co: 3.8 μg/L vs 1.7 μg/L; p = 0.04 and Cr: 1.9 μg/L vs 1.4 μg/L, p = 0.1). On radiographic analyses, 2 LDH THAs showed signs of adverse reaction to metal debris, whereas 1 loose femoral HR component was documented.

CONCLUSION

In the long-term, MoM LDH THA had a high trunnion related revision rate but nonetheless showed better PROMs compared to HR. Provided with a well-functioning modular junction, non-MoM LDH THA would offer an appealing option.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04516239 ), August 18, 2020. Retrospectively registered.

Outcome of Dual Mobility Constructs for Adverse Local Tissue Reaction Associated Abductor Deficiency in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Treatment of adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR) is challenging owing to high complications and poor outcomes after a revision surgery. As dislocation is the most common cause of reoperation, it is often necessary to use advanced articulations such as dual mobility. This study aims to evaluate the outcome and complication rates after revision surgery with dual mobility constructs, compared to constrained and conventional articulations in the setting of significant abductor deficiency due to ALTR.

METHODS

Out of a total of 338 revision total hip arthroplasties for ALTR, 234 patients with a significant tissue necrosis and abductor muscle insufficiency (grade 3) were evaluated. The complication rates after revisions were compared between 42 hips with dual mobility implants, 24 hips with constrained liners, 104 hips with large diameter heads (36-40 mm), and 64 hips with small diameter heads (≤32 mm).

RESULTS

After an average of 4 years of follow-up (2.8-8.6), the dual mobility articulation had no dislocation, compared to 4.1% and 15.5% for constrained liner and conventional articulations, respectively (P < .001). Utilization of dual mobility and constrained liner cup also did not increase the risk of nondislocation complications, including periprosthetic joint infection and periprosthetic fracture (P = .18 and .52).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates significantly lower dislocation rates for dual mobility when compared to conventional articulations and comparable to constrained liners in cases of severe abductor deficiency due to ALTR, suggesting that dual mobility implants are viable surgical treatment alternatives to constrained liners to minimize dislocation during revision total hip arthroplasty in the setting of significant abductor deficiency due to ALTR.

Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty with Large Diameter Heads: A Systematic Review

Ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) total hip arthroplasties (THAs) with large heads (>36 mm) were introduced to reduce dislocation rates and restore the hip anatomy as closely as possible to the native one. To date, the literature is scarce and fragmented; a review is desirable to point out the outcomes and the possible specific complications (noise, groin pain, and taperosis). A systematic review about large-diameter COC THAs was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched using the terms "large", "big", "head", "hip", and "ceramic." The methodological quality of the papers was assessed using the MINORS (Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies) score. Seven papers (level of evidence: 5 case series and 2 case-control studies) met the inclusion criteria. Clinical outcomes were excellent in >90% of the patients. Groin pain was reported in only 1 article (7%). Radiological outcomes were positive. Minimal revision rates (<2%) were reported at short- to mid-term follow-ups. Dislocation rates were usually <1%. No bearing surfaces failed. No case of trunnionitis was reported. Noise occurred in up to 30% of the patients, mostly squeaking. The noise did not influence clinical outcomes or patients' satisfaction. Noise was inconstantly associated with component positioning, younger age, high articular excursions, and larger sizes. Large-diameter heads in COC THAs (≥40 mm) showed promising clinical and radiological outcomes with minimal revision rates. Noise is a cause of concern and should be carefully evaluated at longer follow-ups and in larger, prospective, and specifically designed case series.

Early Results of Our International, Multicenter, Multisurgeon, Double-Blinded, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Metal-on-Metal With Ceramic-on-Metal in Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The aim of our prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial (titled M2A-38 Ceramic-on-Metal RCT, NCT00754520) is to demonstrate noninferiority of a ceramic-on-metal (CoM) articulation compared with metal-on-metal (MoM) in total hip arthroplasty. The study arms are at 8 years since implantation, with metal ion and functional score analysis at 5 years.

METHODS

We recruited 211 patients between 2009 and 2011. The patients were randomized to ceramic or metal. A cohort of these patients had whole blood metal ions performed yearly, and all patients underwent annual radiographic and clinical outcome assessment. All revisions were recorded and some explants were analyzed. Recruitment ceased earlier than planned owing to concerns raised with failure of MoM implants.

RESULTS

No significant difference was seen in patient demographics, radiographic parameters, or functional outcomes at any time point. Lower cobalt ion levels were seen in the CoM group (P < .01) at all time points. Chromium levels were significantly lower in the CoM group up to 3 years, but raised at 5 years. There were slightly fewer revisions for adverse reaction to metal debris in the CoM group. Explant analysis suggested a different wear pattern to those seen in the MoM group.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrated that the CoM articulation behaved the same as the MoM in terms of functional outcome and radiographic parameters. The CoM coupling also demonstrates raised metal ions beyond 3 years and increasing revisions for adverse reaction to metal debris. It remains difficult to see a clinical application for CoM and further exploration or use is not warranted.

Plain radiography findings to predict dislocation after total hip arthroplasty

Background

With the improvements of modern surgical techniques and hip prosthesis, the causes for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA) have changed. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to identify new plain radiography findings to predict dislocation after THA.

Methods

Five thousand five hundred thirteen consecutive primary THAs performed between January 2000 and December 2014 were reviewed through a nested case–control study design. Among them, 38 patients with 39 hip dislocations (dislocation group) were selected and matched to 78 hips in 78 patients without dislocation (control group). The factors that might influence the prosthetic stability were identified by univariate analyses, and a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the odds ratio of each factor.

Results

The difference of the cup position was not statistically significant. The newly identified risk factors were the following: preoperative hip adduction deformity combined with limb lengthening of 2 cm postoperatively; a knee valgus combined with pelvic obliquity deformity and bilateral pathological hips.

Conclusions

Patients with soft tissue imbalance, across joint deformity around hips and bilateral pathological hips seem more predisposed to suffer from dislocation after THA. Appropriate surgical intervention strategies along with meticulously postoperative management may help preventing dislocation after THA.

The translational potential of this article

A better understanding of the probable causes of dislocation after THA proposed a new clinical application of plain radiography. This radiography-related clinical research may reveal the novel mechanism of dislocation after THA and new preventive measures.

Comparative Mid-term Follow-up Study of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with Metal-on-metal and Metal-on-polyethylene Bearings

OBJECTIVE

To compare mid-term clinical results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) with metal-on-metal (MoM) and metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) bearings and to evaluate the biological safety of the two kinds of prostheses.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients who received a primary THA with an MoM articulation between January 2008 and December 2010 were selected to form the MoM group retrospectively. The MoP group consisted of 32 patients who received a THA with an MoP prosthesis during the same period. Clinical assessments, imaging examinations, laboratory tests, and metal ion concentration detections were conducted on each patient. Another 32 healthy volunteers were recruited as the control group.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients in the MoM group and 28 patients in the MoP group completed the follow-up, with a mean follow-up time of 74.6 and 75.9 months, respectively. The mean Harris score at the latest follow-up was 91.5 ± 5.1 in the MoM group versus 88.9 ± 4.0 in the MoP group (P = 0.22). The MoM group showed a better range of motion in flexion, abduction, and external rotation. Co and Cr levels in the MoM group were 2.5-fold and 2.0-fold of these in the MoP group. A mild change of liver function was observed in both groups, while the values of renal function and humoral immunity stayed static. Elevated proportions of Th1 and Th17 cells and decreased proportion of Th2 cells were observed in the MoM group. The occurrence rate of pseudotumors in the MoM and MoP groups was 40.74% ± 9.45% and 14.28% ± 6.61%, respectively (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

At the mid-term follow-up, clinical results were satisfied in both groups. MoM prosthesis could result in elevated serum metal ion levels and there is a higher risk of pseudotumor. Long follow-up is needed to evaluate the safety of MoM prostheses.

Cadaver-Specific Models for Finite-Element Analysis of Iliopsoas Impingement in Dual-Mobility Hip Implants

BACKGROUND

Joint dislocation is a major cause of failure in total hip arthroplasty. Dual-mobility implants provide a femoral head diameter that can match the native hip size for greater stability against dislocation. However, such large heads are prone to impingement against surrounding soft tissues. To address this concern, the concept of an anatomically contoured dual-mobility implant was evaluated using cadaver-specific finite-element analysis (FEA).

METHODS

The stiffness of 10 iliopsoas tendons was measured and also 3D bone models, contact pressure, and iliopsoas tendon stress were evaluated for 2 implant designs according to a previous cadaveric experiment. The iliopsoas interaction with an anatomically contoured and conventional dual-mobility implant was analyzed throughout hip flexion.

RESULTS

The tensile test of cadaveric iliopsoas tendons revealed an average linear stiffness of 339.4 N/mm, which was used as an input for the FEA. Tendon-liner contact pressure and tendon von Mises stress decreased with increasing hip flexion for both implants. Average contact pressure and von Mises stresses were lower in the anatomically contoured design compared with the conventional implant across all specimens and hip flexion angles.

CONCLUSIONS

This study was built upon a previous cadaver study showing reduced tenting of the iliopsoas tendon for an anatomically contoured design compared with a conventional dual-mobility implant. The present cadaver-specific FEA study found reduced tendon-liner contact pressure and tendon stresses with contoured dual-mobility liners. Anatomical contoured design may be a solution to avoid anterior soft-tissue impingement when using hip prostheses with large femoral heads.

Excellent results of large-diameter ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty

Aims

This study reports the mid-term results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed using a monoblock acetabular component with a large-diameter head (LDH) ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearing.

Patients and Methods

Of the 276 hips (246 patients) included in this study, 264 (96%) were reviewed at a mean of 67 months (48 to 79) postoperatively. Procedures were performed with a mini posterior approach. Clinical and radiological outcomes were recorded at regular intervals. A noise assessment questionnaire was completed at last follow-up.

Results

There were four re-operations (1%) including one early revision for insufficient primary fixation (0.4%). No hip dislocation was reported. The mean University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score, 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) Mental Component Summary (MCS) score, SF-12 Physical Component Summary (PCS) score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) were 6.6 (2 to 10), 52.8 (25.5 to 65.7), 53.0 (27.2 to 66.5), 7.7 (0 to 63), and 88.5 (23 to 100), respectively. No signs of loosening or osteolysis were observed on radiological review. The incidence of squeaking was 23% (n = 51/225). Squeaking was significantly associated with larger head diameter (p < 0.001), younger age (p < 0.001), higher SF-12 PCS (p < 0.001), and UCLA scores (p < 0.001). Squeaking did not affect patient satisfaction, with 100% of the squeaking hips satisfied with the surgery.

Conclusion

LDH CoC THAs have demonstrated excellent functional outcomes at medium-term follow-up, with very low revision rate and no dislocations. The high incidence of squeaking did not affect patient satisfaction or function. LDH CoC with a monoblock acetabular component has the potential to provide long term implant survivorship with unrestricted activity, while avoiding implant impingement, liner fracture at insertion, and hip instability. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1434–41.

Surgical Approach May Influence Survival of Large-Diameter Head Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty: A 6- to 10-Year Follow-Up Study

Large-diameter head (LDH) metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) has lost popularity because of metal allergy or ALTRs (adverse local tissue reactions) in the past decade. Whether the surgical approach may influence the survival of LDH-MoM-THA has not been reported. From 2006 to 2009, we performed 96 LDH-MoM-THAs on 80 patients using an in situ head-neck assembly technique through a modified Watson-Jones approach. With a mean follow-up of 8.4 years (range, 6.3–10.1 years), the implant survival rate was 100%. All patients were satisfied with the results and the Harris Hip Score improved from 52 points to 98 points. No ALTRs were found, but 17.7% of the 96 hips (17 adverse events) experienced adverse events related to the cup, including 5 cases of outlier cup malposition, 11 cases of inadequate cup seating, and 1 acetabular fracture. The tissue tension that was improved by a muscle-sparing approach might lessen the chance of microseparation or edge-loading that is taken as the major risk for early implant failure. Further investigation of whether these LDH-MoM-THAs would fail or not would require a longer follow-up or even retrieval analysis in the future.

Short stem total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the femoral head in patients 60 years or younger: a 3- to 10-year follow-up study

Background

In young patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), short-stem total hip arthroplasty (THA) could allow a potential advantage in preserving metaphyseal bone-stock, when revision surgery might become necessary. However, only a few studies have evaluated the outcome of short-stem THAs in ONFH. We reviewed the prospectively collected data of a cementless partial neck-retaining short-stem with ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in ONFH patients.

Methods

Thirty patients (37 hips) younger than 60 years (mean age at surgery, 51.5 years) underwent THA with the NANOS® stem (Smith and Nephew, Marl, Germany) from January 2006 to December 2012. All patients received a 32-mm or 36 mm ceramic femoral head. Harris hip score, WOMAC and UCLA activity score were recorded. Postoperative radiographs were evaluated for bone-implant fixation and osteolysis. Further analysis correlated clinical findings with implants characteristics and patient demographics at mean 5.6 years’ follow-up (range, 3–10 years).

Results

The clinical and functional results improved significantly (p < 0.001). At latest follow-up, mean HHS, WOMAC, and UCLA activity scores were 90 (range, 71–100), 94 (range, 76–100), and 6.3 (range, 4–10) points, respectively. The diameter of the femoral head did not influence the clinical outcome (p = 0.661). All hips showed bone ingrowth fixation of the acetabular and femoral components. No patients showed osteolysis. No revision for any reason was performed during the study period.

Conclusions

The excellent clinical results and fixation pattern at mean 5.6 years’ follow-up reveal this implant as a reliable option in advanced stage of ONFH either. Further investigations are crucial to determine the long-term durability and to assess whether the association of ceramic-on-ceramic bearings, can be useful to achieve longer survivorship and lower complications rates.

Trial registration

Registry number: ISRCTN 91336248; date of registration: 04/07/2017.

Current Epidemiology of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in the United States: National Inpatient Sample 2009 to 2013

BACKGROUND

Despite the excellent outcomes associated with primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), implant failure and revision continues to burden the healthcare system. THA failure has evolved and displays variability throughout the literature. In order to understand how THAs are failing and how to reduce this burden, it is essential to assess modes of implant failure on a large scale. Thus, we report: (1) etiologies for revision THA; (2) frequencies of revision THA procedures; (3) patient demographics, payor type, and US Census region of revision THA patients; and (4) the length of stay and total costs based on the type of revision THA procedure.

METHODS

We queried the National Inpatient Sample database for all revision THA procedures performed between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2013. This yielded 258,461 revision THAs. Patients specific demographics were identified in order to determine the prevalence of revision procedure performed.

RESULTS

Dislocation was the main indication for revision THA (17.3%), followed by mechanical loosening (16.8%). All-component revision was the most common procedure performed (41.8%). Patients were most commonly white (77.4%), aged 75 years and older (31.6%), and resided in the South US Census region (37.0%). The average length of stay for all procedures was 5.29 days. The mean total charge for revision THA procedures was $77,851.24.

CONCLUSION

Dislocation and mechanical loosening is the predominant indication for revision THA in the United States. With the frequency of revision THAs projected to double in the next decade, orthopedists must take steps to mitigate this potentially devastating complication.

Constrained liners, dual mobility or large diameter heads to avoid dislocation in THA

Dislocation remains a common cause of failure after total hip arthroplasty. The limitations of existing approaches to address instability have led to the development of powerfull options: constrained liners, dual mobility and large heads. These implant-related options have proven to be very efficient, but have raised concerns.With constrained liners, restricted range of motion (ROM) is responsible for impingement leading to high likelihood of failure, depending on the design, with various failure modes.Improvements of the bearing materials have addressed some of the concerns about increased volumetric wear of conventional polyethylene and offer an option to reduce instability: large diameter heads have the advantage of increased ROM before impingement, increased head-neck ratio, and jump distance. Highly cross-linked polyethylene helps address the risk for increased wear, and also large heads provide improved stability without the risk of mechanical failures observed with constrained liners. However, the increase of the head size remains limited as reducing the thickness of the liner may lead to fractures. In addition, the jump distance decreases as the cup abduction increases.The dual mobility concept simultaneously attempts to address head-neck ratio, constraint, and jump distance. Despite the need for longer follow-up, concerns raised about potential increased wear and intra-prosthetic dislocation with first generation implants have been addressed with modern designs.With a dramatic increase of the head-neck ratio whilst reducing the risk of mechanical failure or excessive wear, dual mobility THA outperforms large diameter heads and constrained liners at 10 years follow-up. For these reasons, dual mobility continues to gain interest worldwide and is becoming the most popular option to manage instability. Cite this article: Guyen O. Constrained liners, dual mobility or large diameter heads to avoid dislocation in THA. EFORT Open Rev 2016;1:197-204. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.000054.

Survival of uncemented cups from a single manufacturer implanted from 1985 to 2013: Finnish Arthroplasty Register data

INTRODUCTION

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) with uncemented implants has been a relatively common procedure in Finland during the recent decades. The most common brand of uncemented implants was chosen for further analysis to study the survivorship of this uncemented cup design in comparison to cemented references.

PATIENTS, MATERIALS AND METHODS

Since 1980, The Finnish Arthroplasty Register has collected information on THAs on a national level. This study was based on information of THAs recorded in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register from 1985 to 2013. If patient had undergone bilateral THA, only the first one was included. Altogether, 49,289 THAs were included.

RESULTS

The overall 10-year implant survivorship of uncemented implants was 84.3% (95% CI 83.5-85.0%) and of cemented implants 90.6% (90.2-90.0%). The 10-year survival of the contemporary uncemented implants was 90.8% (94.0-95.5%) and 88.5% (84.2-91.7%). The most recently introduced uncemented cup designs had good survivorship rates at 5 years; 10-year survival data are not yet available.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that modern uncemented cup designs may provide good long-term survivorship rates comparable with the gold standard of cemented cups. However, polyethylene wear, liner problems and periosthetic osteolysis may still occur, also with modern uncemented acetabular components.

601 metal-on-metal total hip replacements with 36 mm heads a 5 minimum year follow up: Levels of ARMD remain low despite a comprehensive screening program

BACKGROUND

We conducted a retrospective study to assess the clinical outcome, failure rate, and reason for failure of a large consecutive series of 36 mm MoM Corail/Pinnacle total hip replacements (THRs).

METHODS

Between 2006 and 2011, 601 consecutive 36 mm MoM THRs were performed (585 patients). Patients were followed according to the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) guidelines. All patients were accounted for and 469 patients (78%) were clinically and radiographically assessed. 328 females and 141 males with a median age of 73 (range 36-94 years) and a median follow up of 7.2 years (range 5.2-9.7 years) were followed. Clinical data included blood cobalt and chromium, Oxford Hip Score (OHS), plain radiograph, ultrasound of hip and intra-operative findings in those patients who had revision surgery.

RESULTS

56 patients died of causes unrelated to their hip replacement. The mean survivorship of the implant was 92.8% (range 91.6-94%, 95% CI) at a median time to follow up of 84 months (62-113 months). The functional outcome was good with a median OHS of 38 out of 48 (23-44). The dislocation rate was 0.99%, with all these 6 cases requiring revision. 476 patients had blood tests. 100 patients (21%) had elevated levels of either cobalt above MHRA guidelines of 7 parts per billion (120 and 135 nmol/L respectively for cobalt and chromium). Cobalt was elevated independently of chromium in 75% of the cases (but never vice versa). The mean cup inclination angle was 42°. Each incremental stem size increase resulted in a decrease in cobalt by 11 nmol/L. The most common reason for revision was adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD) (12 cases).

CONCLUSION

This paper is the largest and longest follow up of 36 mm MoM THRs. Using the MHRA guidelines for follow up, the revision rates of this cohort has remained low compared to other studies, but unacceptably higher than that of other bearing surfaces.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Total hip arthroplasty instability in Italy

Hip dislocation is a major and common complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA), which appears with an incidence between 0.3% and 10% in primary total hip arthroplasties and up to 28% in revision THA. The hip dislocations can be classified into three groups: early, intermediate and late. Approximately two-thirds of cases can be treated successfully with a non-operative approach. The rest require further surgical intervention. The prerequisite to developing an appropriate treatment strategy is a thorough evaluation to identify the causes of the dislocation. In addition, many factors that contribute to THA dislocation are related to the surgical technique, mainly including component orientation, femoral head diameter, restoration of femoral offset and leg length, cam impingement and condition of the soft tissues. The diagnosis of a dislocated hip is relatively easy because the clinical situation is very typical. Having identified a dislocated hip, the first step is to perform a closed reduction of the implant. After reduction you must perform a computed tomography scan to evaluate the surgical options for treatment of recurrent dislocation that include: revision arthroplasty, modular components exchange, dual-mobility cups, large femoral heads, constrained cups, elimination of impingement and soft tissue procedures. The objective is to avoid further dislocation, a devastating event which is increasing the number of operations on the hip. To obtain this goal is useful to follow an algorithm of treatment, but the best treatment remains prevention.

Patient-Specific Templating of Lumbar Total Disk Replacement to Restore Normal Anatomy and Function

The purpose of this study was to develop a tool to determine optimal placement and size for total disk replacements (TDRs) to improve patient outcomes of pain and function. The authors developed a statistical shape model to determine the anatomical variables that influence the placement, function, and outcome of lumbar TDR. A patient-specific finite element analysis model has been developed that is now used prospectively to identify patients suitable for TDR and to create a surgical template to facilitate implant placement to optimize range of motion and clinical outcomes. Patient factors and surgical techniques that determine success regarding function and pain are discussed in this article.

Is there any range-of-motion advantage to using bearings larger than 36mm in primary hip arthroplasty: A case-control study comparing 36-mm and large-diameter heads

BACKGROUND

Large-diameter (>36mm) total hip arthroplasty (THA) has developed rapidly since the advent of ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings and highly cross-linked polyethylene. Theoretically, the increase in diameter reduces the risk of instability, although the advantage of calibers beyond 36mm has not been demonstrated in terms of range-of-motion recovery. We conducted a comparative study with a single prosthesis model to determine whether increasing the caliber beyond 36mm provides: (1) better recovery of range-of-motion, (2) a higher functional score, and (3) reduction of the dislocation rate.

HYPOTHESIS

Increasing the range-of-motion by increasing the caliber beyond 36mm provides better range-of-motion.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed two consecutive, single-operator cementless THA series performed via the mini posterior approach, which differed only in the bearing system (51 metal-on-metal [MoM] with a mean caliber of 45mm±3.3 [range, 40-54] and 61 CoC with a 36-mm caliber). Both series were comparable preoperatively in terms of age, diagnosis, functional scores, preoperative range-of-motion, body mass index, UCLA activity level, and Charnley score. We compared the joint range of movement at follow-up and the gains in range of movement, onset of dislocation, and functional scores (Oxford, Postel-Merle d'Aubigné [PMA]).

RESULTS

The mean overall joint range-of-motion was 254°±39° (range, 150-310°) for an 81°±44° (range, -50 to 180°) gain in the MoM group and 256°±23° (range, 200-280°) for an 84°±40° (range, 0-160°) gain in the CoC group (NS). The MoM group presented the following results: Oxford=13.71±3.66 (range, 12-33) for a gain of 24.82 points±7.9 (range, -1 to 40), PMA=17.75±1.06 (range, 11-18) for a gain of 7.78 points±4.01 (range, 2-15). The CoC group had: Oxford=14.98±4.42 (range, 12-36) for a gain of 24.75 points±6.55 (range, 12-40), PMA 17.66±0.7 (range, 14-18) for a gain of 8 points±3.77 (range, 1-15). None of the gains and scores at follow-up differed significantly between the two groups. No episode of dislocation was identified.

DISCUSSION

The current trend of increasing femoral head diameters beyond 36mm to improve the gains in joint range-of-motion and function is not warranted. The potential side effects of increasing the caliber call for even greater caution in the use of large-diameter heads because our hypothesis has not been confirmed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case-control study, level III.

Radiographic Evaluation of Hip Dislocations Necessitating Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

Although prosthetic hip dislocation is a common reason for revision arthroplasty, few studies have comprehensively evaluated the radiographic factors that may lead to the need for revision. Therefore, the authors radiographically evaluated all prosthetic hip dislocations that were treated at one institution. They then specifically assessed those that required revision surgery. The authors found that the prosthetic center of rotation (pCOR) was located superolateral and inferolateral to the native COR (nCOR) in all patients. Most hips had pCOR distances more than 5 mm from the nCOR. Furthermore, most patients had cup inclination and anteversion angles within Lewinnek's previously defined "safe zone." Determining these similarities and properly planning these procedures may help decrease the instability rate and therefore improve the overall success of this procedure. [Orthopedics.2016; 39(5):e1011-e1018.].

Treatment of the Failed Modular Neck Stems: Tips and Tricks

BACKGROUND

Modular femoral components emerged because of the advantages of recreating limb length, offset, and native femoral version in total hip arthroplasty. Despite its potential benefits, the increase in modularity at the head-neck junction can lead to corrosion and subsequently failure of the implant.

METHODS

We present 3 case examples of patients who underwent revision surgery secondary to corrosion of their modular femoral components.

RESULTS

Issues addressed include understanding corrosion at the head-neck junction, presentations of adverse local tissue reactions, efficacy of metal ion testing and metal artifact reduction sequence magnetic resonance imaging, and approaches to revision surgery for failed modular neck stems.

CONCLUSIONS

When revision surgery is indicated for failed modular neck stems, we recommend a thoughtful approach with contemporary extraction techniques and options to enhance stability. Furthermore, long-term follow-up is needed to define the growing effect of modularity in total hip arthroplasty.

No benefit on functional outcomes and dislocation rates by increasing head size to 36 mm in ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty

Background

Ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) total hip arthroplasty (THA) has gained popularity since improvements in wear characteristics and longevity. Whether large ceramic femoral heads (≥36 mm) have increased postoperative range of motion (ROM) and a lower dislocation rate is not clear. This study aimed to compare functional outcomes and early complications between large-head (≥36 mm) and smaller-head (≤32 mm) COC prostheses with a minimum follow-up of 12 months.

Methods

A total of 95 consecutive uncemented COC THAs were performed in 90 patients between January 2012 and July 2013. Of these, 49 patients (smaller-head group) received third generation and 41 patients (large-head group) received fourth generation COC prostheses. Harris hip score (HHS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis index (WOMAC), and ROM of the hip pre- and post-operatively were compared, as well as the presence of early complications.

Results

Postoperative HHSs (88.4 vs. 89.3, p = 0.34) and WOMAC scores (12.0 vs. 11.0, p = 0.111) were not different between the groups. Postoperative flexion ROM was lower in the smaller-head group (98.8° vs. 106.1°, p < 0.001), but there were no differences in extension, abduction, adduction, internal rotation, and external rotation. One patient in each group reported a grinding noise. There was one dislocation (1.9%) in the smaller-head group, and none in the large-head group (p = 0.371). No infections or loosening of the components occurred.

Conclusions

Large-head COC articulation provided better flexion, but functional outcomes and early complications are similar to the smaller-head COC.

[Larger heads compensate for an increased risk of THA dislocation in high-risk patients]

BACKGROUND

Dislocation is a devastating complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and occurs in 2-5% of primary THA cases and 5-10% of revision THA cases. Assuming correct implantation, dislocation risk can be reduced primarily by capsular repair and the use of larger prosthetic heads. However, larger heads are also associated with risks like accelerated wear or implant loosening, which is why heads with a maximum diameter of 36 mm are currently standard in primary THA. In cases with high dislocation risk, the use of 40 mm and 44 mm heads should be considered.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to quantify THA dislocation risk and retrospectively analyze the course of disease in high-risk patients treated with 40 mm or 44 mm femoral heads after primary or revision THA, concerning dislocation and other complications suffered.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients with increased THA dislocation risk, treated from 2009-2014, were evaluated regarding dislocations. The cases with installation of 40 mm or 44 mm prosthetic heads were classified using a self-developed 5-level risk score and retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

During the observation period, 288 THA interventions with increased dislocation risk were performed. In 278 cases with ball diameters ≤ 36 mm the dislocation rate was 15.1% (n=42). In 10 high dislocation-risk cases (3A to 4B according to recommended scoring system), 40 mm and 44 mm heads were used. After a 22.8 month mean follow-up, no THA dislocations were reported.

CONCLUSION

Our results with 40 and 44 mm heads and the existing literature confirm much higher joint stability and, thus, significantly reduced dislocation risk with larger prosthetic heads in THA. Their use is, therefore, justified in high-risk patients and should be considered in future THA.

Muscular strength after total hip arthroplasty. A prospective comparison of 3 surgical approaches

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Minimizing the decrease in muscular strength after total hip arthroplasty (THA) might allow patients to recover faster. We evaluated muscular strength in patients who were operated on using 3 surgical approaches. PATIENTS AND METHODs: In a prospective cohort study, 60 patients scheduled for primary THA were allocated to the direct lateral, posterior, or anterior approach. Leg press and abduction strength were evaluated 2 weeks or less preoperatively, 2 and 8 days postoperatively, and at 6-week and 3-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Differences in maximal strength change were greatest after 2 and 8 days. The posterior and anterior approaches produced less decrease in muscular strength than the direct lateral approach. 6 weeks postoperatively, the posterior approach produced greater increase in muscular strength than the direct lateral approach, and resulted in a greater increase in abduction strength than the anterior approach. At 3-month follow-up, no statistically significant differences between the groups were found. The operated legs were 18% weaker in leg press and 15% weaker in abduction than the unoperated legs, and the results were similar between groups.

INTERPRETATION

The posterior and anterior approaches appeared to have the least negative effect on abduction and leg press muscular strength in the first postoperative week; the posterior approach had the least negative effect, even up to 6 weeks postoperatively. THA patients have reduced muscle strength in the operated leg (compared to the unoperated leg) 3 months after surgery.

A forty millimetre head significantly improves range of motion compared with a twenty eight millimetre head in total hip arthroplasty using a computed tomography-based navigation system

PURPOSE

Larger-diameter (≥40 mm) femoral heads decrease the incidence of post-operative dislocation in total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study was conducted to discover whether larger-diameter femoral heads result in greater range of motion of the hip with the use of a computed tomography (CT)-based navigation system.

METHODS

Thirty-nine primary THAs were performed via a posterolateral approach using a CT-based navigation system. The stem was inserted in the femur in line with the original femoral neck anteversion. Considering the range of motion during various daily activities which could occur without impingement, the cup anteversion was decided at 10 ° increments according to the stem anteversion. While the cup inclination was set at 40 ° in order to avoid a high inclination angle to prevent the edge roading between the HXLPE liner and ceramic head. After implantation, trial liners and femoral heads were used with either 28 or 40 mm diameter. Maximal hip flexion, extension, abduction, external rotation in extension at 0° and internal rotation angles in flexion at 90 ° were measured. The differences between the ranges of motion with the 40-mm and 28-mm heads were tested. The results were assessed with paired Student t-tests.

RESULTS

The ranges of motion in flexion, extension, abduction and internal rotation angles improved significantly with the 40-mm heads compared with the 28-mm heads. The ranges of motion of cases where maximal flexion angle was 90° or less were excluded, improved significantly with the 40 mm heads.

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that the larger-diameter 40-mm femoral prosthetic heads result in greater ranges of motion in flexion, extension, abduction and internal rotation.

Is There a Benefit to Head Size Greater Than 36 mm in Total Hip Arthroplasty?

This study compares the rate of dislocation and revision for instability between 36-mm and anatomic femoral heads (large diameter metal-on-metal THA, dual-mobility bearings, and hip resurfacing arthroplasty) in patients at high risk for dislocation. A total of 501 high-risk patients, over a 10-year period, were identified (282 36-mm THA, 24 dual-mobility bearings, 83 metal-on-metal arthroplasty, and 112 hip resurfacing arthroplasty). There were 13 dislocations in the 36-mm group compared to 1 in the anatomic group (4.6% vs 0.5%; P = .005). Four patients dislocated more than once in the 36-mm group (1.4% vs 0%; P = .04), and 2 patients in the 36-mm group required a revision for instability (0.7% vs 0%; P = .11). These results suggest that anatomic head sizes significantly lower the risk of dislocation in high-risk patients.

Primary ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty using a 32-mm ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeve

BACKGROUND

Modern ceramic-on-ceramic bearings have become attractive alternatives to conventional polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty (THA) as a result of their low wear and minimal particle production. However, 28-mm heads in ceramic-on-ceramic bearing couples have been associated with ceramic fracture. To address these issues, 32-mm and larger ceramic heads with a titanium-alloy sleeve have been introduced, although limited data are available on their durability and clinical outcomes.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We determined (1) the survivorship of the primary ceramic-on-ceramic THA using a 32-mm ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeve at a minimum followup of 5 years; (2) Harris hip scores; (3) the incidence of ceramic fracture and noisy hip; and (4) the proportion of hips showing radiographic evidence of osteolysis.

METHODS

From November 2005 to August 2009, we performed 301 ceramic-on-ceramic THAs using a 32-mm ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeve in 270 patients. Of these, 12 patients (12 hips [4%]) died from problems unrelated to surgery and 13 patients (15 hips [5%]) were lost during followup before a minimum of 5 years had been reached, leaving 245 patients who had 274 THAs with a minimum followup of 5 years (mean, 6.5 years; range, 5-9 years) in this retrospective analysis. During the study period, 30% (301 of 997 hips) were performed with this articulation based on the operating surgeon's discretion. The mean patient age at the time of surgery was 55 years (range, 16-82 years). All operations were performed at a single center. All of the ceramic implants were hot isostatic-pressed, laser-marked, proof-tested third-generation alumina. We determined the implant survival, Harris hip scores, incidence of ceramic fracture or noisy hips (based on a questionnaire), and presence of osteolysis.

RESULTS

The survival rate of ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in primary THA using a 32-mm ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeve was 98% (95% confidence interval, 96%-100%) at 9 years. The Harris hip score improved from a mean of 47 points preoperatively to 93 points at last followup. One ceramic head fractured at 6 years postoperatively. No ceramic liners fractured. Audible hip clicking and squeaking were identified in four hips and one hip, respectively. Osteolysis was detected in three hips, but none had symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary ceramic-on-ceramic THA using a 32-mm ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeve has a survivorship of 98% at 9-year followup. Nevertheless, surgeons should be aware of the potential risks of ceramic fracture, noise, and osteolysis associated with the use of a ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeve.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Revision of Articular Surface Replacement (ASR) Total Hip Arthroplasty: Correlation of Perioperative Data and Early Post-Revision Outcome Results

The articular surface replacement (ASR) total hip arthroplasty (THA) showed accelerated failure rates due to adverse-reaction to metal debris (ARMD). Literature correlating preoperative with intraoperative revision findings respectively post-revision outcome results are rare. 30 of 99 available ASR THA were revised due to ARMD. Mean post-revision follow-up term was 2.3 years. In part, preoperative data did not correlate with intraoperative revision findings. ARMD was even found in asymptomatic patients with non-elevated ion levels. Postoperative pain and metal ions decreased significantly (P ≤ 0.016). Cobalt decreased faster than chrome. Patients with intraoperative pseudotumors, osteolysis or bilateral THA did not have higher pre- or postoperative ion values (P ≥ 0.053). Females showed higher postoperative chrome levels (P=0.031). One major post-revision complication (femoral nerve palsy) and one re-revision (late onset infection) occurred.

Wear resistance of the biocompatible phospholipid polymer-grafted highly cross-linked polyethylene liner against larger femoral head

The use of larger femoral heads to prevent the dislocation of artificial hip joints has recently become more common. However, concerns about the subsequent use of thinner polyethylene liners and their effects on wear rate have arisen. Previously, we prepared and evaluated the biological and mechanical effects of a novel highly cross-linked polyethylene (CLPE) liner with a nanometer-scaled graft layer of poly(2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine) (PMPC). Our findings showed that the PMPC-grafted particles were biologically inert and caused no subsequent bone resorptive responses and that the PMPC-grafting markedly decreased wear in a hip joint simulator. However, the metal or ceramic femoral heads used in this previous study had a diameter of 26 mm. Here, we investigated the wear-resistance of the PMPC-grafted CLPE liner with a 40-mm femoral head during 10 × 10(6) cycles of loading in the hip joint simulator. The results provide preliminary evidence that the grafting markedly decreased gravimetric wear rate and the volume of wear particles, even when coupled with larger femoral heads. Thus, we believe the PMPC-grafting will prolong artificial hip joint longevity both by preventing aseptic loosening and by improving the stability of articular surface.

In-vivo hip arthrokinematics during supine clinical exams: Application to the study of femoroacetabular impingement

Visualization of hip articulation relative to the underlying anatomy (i.e., arthrokinematics) is required to understand hip dysfunction in femoroacetabular (FAI) patients. In this exploratory study, we quantified in-vivo arthrokinematics of a small cohort of asymptomatic volunteers and three symptomatic patients with varying FAI deformities during the passive impingement, FABER, and rotational profile exams using dual fluoroscopy and model-based tracking. Joint angles, joint translations, and relative pelvic angles were calculated. Compared to the 95% confidence interval of the asymptomatic cohort, FAI patients appeared to have decreased adduction and internal rotation during the impingement exam and greater flexion and less abduction/external rotation in the FABER exam. During the rotational profile, only the FAI patient with the most severe deformities demonstrated considerable rotation deficits. In all participants, contact between the labrum and femoral head/neck limited motion during the impingement exam, but not the rotational profile. Substantial pelvic motion was measured during the impingement exam and FABER test in all participants. Femoral translation along any given anatomical direction ranged between 0.69 and 4.1mm. These results suggest that hip articulation during clinical exams is complex in asymptomatic hips and hips with FAI, incorporating pelvic motion and femur translation. Range of motion appears to be governed by femur-labrum contact and other soft tissue constraints, suggesting that current computer simulations that rely on direct bone contact to predict impingement may be unrealistic. Additional research is necessary to confirm these preliminary results. Still, dual fluoroscopy data may serve to validate existing software platforms or create new programs that better-represent hip arthrokinematics.

Large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: dislocation infrequent but survivorship poor

BACKGROUND

Use of large-diameter metal-on-metal (MoM) articulations in THA increased, at least in part, because of the possibility of achieving improved joint stability and excellent wear characteristics in vitro. However, there have been subsequent concerning reports with adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD), pseudotumors, and systemic complications related to metal ions.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purpose of this study was to determine at a minimum of 2 years' followup (1) the proportion of patients who experienced a dislocation; (2) the short-term survivorship obtained with these implants; (3) the causes of failure and the proportion of patients who developed ARMD; and (4) whether there were any identifiable risk factors for revision.

METHODS

We reviewed the results of 1235 patients who underwent 1440 large-diameter MoM primary THAs at our institution using two acetabular devices from a single manufacturer with minimum 2-year followup. Large-diameter MoM devices were used in 48% (1695 of 3567) of primary THAs during the study period. We generally used these implants in younger, more active, higher-demand patients, in patients considered at higher risk of instability, and in patients with adequate bone stock to achieve stable fixation without use of screws. Clinical records and radiographs were reviewed to determine the incidence and etiology of revision. Patients whose hips were revised were compared with those not revised to identify risk factors; Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed as was multivariate analysis to account for potential confounding variables when evaluating risk factors. Minimum followup was 2 years (average, 7 years; range, 2-12 years); complete followup was available in 85% of hips (1440 of 1695).

RESULTS

Dislocation occurred in one hip overall (<1%; one of 1440). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed survival free of component revision was 87% at 12 years (95% confidence interval, 84%-90%). The two most common indications for revision were ARMD (48%; 47 of 108 hips revised) and loosening or failure of ingrowth (31%; 34 of 108). Risk factors for component revision were younger age at surgery (relative risk [RR] 0.98 per each increased year; p=0.02), higher cup angle of inclination (RR 1.03 per each increased degree; p=0.04), and female sex (RR 1.67; p=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Large-diameter MoM THAs are associated with a very low dislocation rate, but failure secondary to ARMD and loosening or lack of ingrowth occur frequently. Patients with MoM THA should be encouraged to return for clinical and radiographic followup, and clinicians should maintain a low threshold to perform a systematic evaluation. Early diagnosis and appropriate treatment are recommended to prevent the damaging effects of advanced ARMD.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Therapeutic study.

Revisions of monoblock metal-on-metal THAs have high early complication rates

BACKGROUND

A relatively high percentage of monoblock metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties (THAs) undergo early revision. Revision of these THAs poses challenges unique to this implant type. The early complications after these revisions remain unreported as do the clinical and demographic factors associated with these complications.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We describe (1) the frequency of early complications after revision of monoblock metal-on-metal THA; and (2) the clinical and demographic factors associated with complications.

METHODS

A review of our institution's total joint registry identified 107 patients who underwent 114 revisions of monoblock metal-on-metal THAs. Mean patient age at revision was 60 years (range, 17-84 years), and 65% of the patients were women. Mean followup after revision was 14 months (range, 0-122 months). Revision diagnoses included metallosis (51%), aseptic loosening (27%), infection (7%), pain (6%), malposition (4%), instability (3%), iliopsoas impingement (2%), and periprosthetic fracture (1%). Major complications (instability, infection, aseptic loosening, and wound complications) were documented and included in the analysis. Minor postoperative complications such as urinary tract infection were excluded.

RESULTS

Twenty-three of 114 procedures (20%) involved at least one early complication after revision of monoblock metal-on-metal THA with 18 (16%) undergoing at least one additional subsequent surgery. The most common complications included aseptic loosening (6%), deep infection (6%), dislocation (4%), and acetabular fracture (3%). Patients who sustained a complication after revision surgery were older on average than those who did not (66 years versus 58 years, p=0.003). There were no differences in complication rate with respect to sex, time to revision, or revision diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Complications and reoperations occur frequently after revision for failed monoblock metal-on-metal THA (20% and 16%, respectively), and older patients appear to be at greater risk for complications after these revisions. Aseptic loosening, deep infection, and instability are all of great concern after revision and surgeons should be aware of these potential complications when undertaking revision of these THAs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A double mobility acetabular implant for primary hip arthroplasty in patients at high risk of dislocation

INTRODUCTION

Dislocation following total hip replacement continues to be a problem for which no completely satisfactory solution has been found. Several methods have been proposed to reduce the incidence of hip dislocations with varying degrees of success, including elevated rim liners, constrained liners and large diameter bearings. We present our experience with the double mobility acetabular component in patients at high risk of instability.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of 65 primary total hip arthroplasties in 55 patients (15 men, 40 women), performed between October 2005 and November 2009. The majority (80%) of patients had at least two and 26% had at least three risk factors for instability. The mean age was 76 years (range: 44-92 years). The patients were followed up for a mean duration of 60 months (range: 36-85 months).

RESULTS

Fourteen patients died and one was lost to follow-up, leaving fifty hips for final assessment. Until the final follow-up appointment, no patients had dislocation and none required revision surgery. The mean Oxford hip score improved from 45.0 to 26.5 (p<0.0001). The mean Merle d'Aubigné pain score improved from 1.4 to 4.9 (p<0.0001), the walking score from 2.3 to 3.1 (p<0.07) and the absolute hip function score from 5.4 to 10.8 (p<0.0001). There were no clinical or radiographic signs of loosening.

CONCLUSIONS

The double mobility acetabular component was successful at preventing dislocation during early to medium-term follow-up. However, as data are still lacking with regard to polyethylene wear rates at the additional bearing surface, it would be prudent to restrict the use of this implant to selected patients at high risk of instability.