Pelvic tilt is minimally changed by total hip arthroplasty

Pelvic Tilt Increases the Risk of Impingement and Alters Impingement Type in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Patient-Specific Simulation Study

Impingement is a significant complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA), resulting in restricted range of motion (ROM). Pelvic tilt (PT) and its variation could alter both post-THA ROM and impingement types, which remains relatively unexplored in the literature. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the impact of PT changes on post-THA ROM and impingement types. Subject-specific ROM was simulated using 3D-CT and clinical data for 56 THA patients. Subsequently, the effect of no-PT, standing preoperative (StPT0) and postoperative PT at 6 (StPT6) and 12 months (StPT12) on maximum ROM (flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, external rotation (ER) and internal rotation at 90° Flexion (IR@90°Flex)) and impingement types (implant-to-implant impingement (ITII), implant-to-bone impingement (ITBI), and bone-to-bone impingement (BTBI)) were investigated. Stong correlations existed between PT and flexion (R2 ≥ 0.686), extension (R2 ≥ 0.527), and IR@90°Flex (R2 ≥ 0.547). Anterior PT exceeding 8.1° and 11.8° were linked to decreased flexion below 110° and IR@90°Flex below 30°, respectively. Each 10° increase in anterior PT resulted in a 10° reduction in flexion and a 10.7° reduction in IR@90°Flex. Impingement types due to PT remained unchanged for flexion/extension, with increased ITII for abduction (8.9%), adduction (23.2%), and IR@90°Flex (16.1%), and increased BTBI (16.1%) for ER. In total, 12.5% and 19.6% of patients experienced clinically relevant ROM change for flexion and IR@90°Flex, respectively for StPT0-StPT6. However, it affected below 5.4% cases when comparing StPT6 and StPT12. Minor changes in impingement type (< 6% of cases) were observed due to changes in PT before and after THA, as well as temporal changes in PT post-THA. However, PT had a substantial impact on impingement types when comparing ROM without considering PT to ROM with PT included. Specifically, anterior PT was associated with reduced flexion and IR@90°Flex, indicating a higher risk of impingement. PT changes over time may lead to clinically relevant alterations in ROM but not impingement types. Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register; Main ID: DRKS00000739.

Patient-Specific Acetabular Safe Zones in Total Hip Arthroplasty: External Validation of a Quantitative Approach to Preoperatively Templating Spinopelvic Parameters

Background

Spinopelvic mechanics are critical in total hip arthroplasty; however, there is no established consensus for adjusting acetabular component positioning based on spinopelvic parameters. This study aimed to (1) validate a recently developed Patient-Specific acetabular safe-zone calculator that factors in spinopelvic parameters and (2) compare differences with hip-spine classification targets.

Methods

A total of 3750 patients underwent primary total hip arthroplasty across 3 academic referral centers, with 33 (0.88%) requiring revision for instability. Spinopelvic parameters were measured before initial total hip arthroplasty, and acetabular component position was measured following the index and revision procedures. Most operations employed either computer navigation or robotic assistance (94%). Surgical approaches included both anterior and posterior techniques. Utilizing our recently developed patient-specific safe-zone calculator, theoretical intraoperative positions were calculated and compared to true component positions before and after revision.

Results

Among 33 patients who underwent revision, none dislocated at an average follow-up of 5.1 years. In the external validation cohort, the average absolute differences between the patient-specific safe-zone and the median hip-spine classification recommendation were 3.8° ± 2.1° inclination and 5.0° ± 3.2° version. For the pooled cohort, the absolute differences between the patient-specific safe-zone targets and the prerevision component positions were 7.9° ± 5.1° inclination and 11.4° ± 6.9° version. After revision, the mean absolute differences decreased to 3.6° ± 3.1° inclination and 5.8° ± 3.5° version (P < .001).

Conclusions

A patient-specific approach improved acetabular component positioning accuracy within 6° of version and 4° of inclination of stable, revised hips. Patient-specific safe zones provide quantitative targets for nuanced spinopelvic preoperative planning that may mitigate risk of instability and may indicate use of assisted technologies.

Contemporary insights into spinopelvic mechanics

Understanding spinopelvic mechanics is important for the success of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Despite significant advancements in appreciating spinopelvic balance, numerous challenges remain. It is crucial to recognize the individual variability and postoperative changes in spinopelvic parameters and their consequential impact on prosthetic component positioning to mitigate the risk of dislocation and enhance postoperative outcomes. This review describes the integration of advanced diagnostic approaches, enhanced technology, implant considerations, and surgical planning, all tailored to the unique anatomy and biomechanics of each patient. It underscores the importance of accurately predicting postoperative spinopelvic mechanics, selecting suitable imaging techniques, establishing a consistent nomenclature for spinopelvic stiffness, and considering implant-specific strategies. Furthermore, it highlights the potential of artificial intelligence to personalize care.

Influence of acetabular and femoral morphology on pelvic tilt

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate whether anterior pelvic plane-pelvic tilt (APP-PT) is associated with distinct hip pathomorphologies. We asked: is there a difference in APP-PT between young symptomatic patients being evaluated for joint preservation surgery and an asymptomatic control group? Does APP-PT vary among distinct acetabular and femoral pathomorphologies? And does APP-PT differ in symptomatic hips based on demographic factors?

Methods

This was an institutional review board-approved, single-centre, retrospective, case-control, comparative study, which included 388 symptomatic hips in 357 patients who presented to our tertiary centre for joint preservation between January 2011 and December 2015. Their mean age was 26 years (SD 2; 23 to 29) and 50% were female. They were allocated to 12 different morphological subgroups. The study group was compared with a control group of 20 asymptomatic hips in 20 patients. APP-PT was assessed in all patients based on supine anteroposterior pelvic radiographs using validated HipRecon software. Values in the two groups were compared using an independent-samples t-test. Multiple regression analysis was performed to examine the influences of diagnoses and demographic factors on APP-PT. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for APP-PT was defined as > 1 SD.

Results

There were no significant differences in APP-PT between the control group and the overall group (1.1° (SD 3.0°; -4.9° to 5.9°) vs 1.8° (SD 3.4°; -6.9° to 13.2°); p = 0.323). Acetabular retroversion and overcoverage groups showed higher mean APP-PTs compared with the control group (p = 0.001 and p = 0.014) and were the only diagnoses with a significant influence on APP-PT in the stepwise multiple regression analysis. All differences were below the MCID. The age, sex, height, weight, and BMI showed no influence on APP-PT.

Conclusion

APP-PT showed no radiologically significant variation across different pathomorphologies of the hip in patients being assessed for joint-preserving surgery.

A patient-specific algorithm for predicting the standing sagittal pelvic tilt one year after total hip arthroplasty

Aims

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of a patient-specific algorithm which we developed for predicting changes in sagittal pelvic tilt after total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods

This retrospective study included 143 patients who underwent 171 THAs between April 2019 and October 2020 and had full-body lateral radiographs preoperatively and at one year postoperatively. We measured the pelvic incidence (PI), the sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic tilt, sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), and thoracic kyphosis to classify patients into types A, B1, B2, B3, and C. The change of pelvic tilt was predicted according to the normal range of SVA (0 mm to 50 mm) for types A, B1, B2, and B3, and based on the absolute value of one-third of the PI-LL mismatch for type C patients. The reliability of the classification of the patients and the prediction of the change of pelvic tilt were assessed using kappa values and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), respectively. Validity was assessed using the overall mean error and mean absolute error (MAE) for the prediction of the change of pelvic tilt.

Results

The kappa values were 0.927 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.861 to 0.992) and 0.945 (95% CI 0.903 to 0.988) for the inter- and intraobserver reliabilities, respectively, and the ICCs ranged from 0.919 to 0.997. The overall mean error and MAE for the prediction of the change of pelvic tilt were -0.3° (SD 3.6°) and 2.8° (SD 2.4°), respectively. The overall absolute change of pelvic tilt was 5.0° (SD 4.1°). Pre- and postoperative values and changes in pelvic tilt, SVA, SS, and LL varied significantly among the five types of patient.

Conclusion

We found that the proposed algorithm was reliable and valid for predicting the standing pelvic tilt after THA.

Patient-Specific Safe Zones for Acetabular Component Positioning in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Mathematically Accounting for Spinopelvic Biomechanics

BACKGROUND

Despite a growing understanding of spinopelvic biomechanics in total hip arthroplasty (THA), there is no validated approach for executing patient-specific acetabular component positioning. The purpose of this study was to (1) validate quantitative, patient-specific acetabular "safe zone" component positioning from spinopelvic parameters and (2) characterize differences between quantitative patient-specific acetabular targets and qualitative hip-spine classification targets.

METHODS

From 2,457 consecutive primary THA patients, 22 (0.88%) underwent revision for instability. Spinopelvic parameters were measured prior to index THA. Acetabular position was measured following index and revision arthroplasty. Using a mathematical proof, we developed an open-source tool translating a surgeon-selected, preoperative standing acetabular target to a patient-specific safe zone intraoperative acetabular target. Difference between the patient-specific safe zone and the actual component position was compared before and after revision. Hip-spine classification targets were compared to patient-specific safe zone targets.

RESULTS

Of the 22 who underwent revision, none dislocated at follow-up (4.6 [range, 1 to 6.9]). Patient-specific safe zone targets differed from prerevision acetabular component position by 9.1 ± 4.2° inclination/13.3 ± 6.7° version; after revision, the mean difference was 3.2 ± 3.0° inclination/5.3 ± 2.7° version. Differences between patient-specific safe zones and the median and extremes of recommended hip-spine classification targets were 2.2 ± 1.9° inclination/5.6 ± 3.7° version and 3.0 ± 2.3° inclination/7.9 ± 3.5° version, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A mathematically derived, patient-specific approach accommodating spinopelvic biomechanics for acetabular component positioning was validated by approximating revised, now-stable hips within 5° version and 3° inclination. These patient-specific safe zones augment the hip-spine classification with prescriptive quantitative targets for nuanced preoperative planning.

Effect of hip flexion contracture on the pelvic sagittal tilt in the supine position: A retrospective case-series study

OBJECTIVES

The functional pelvic plane, which adopts the natural pelvic sagittal tilt in the supine position, is a good reference for determining the cup angle in total hip arthroplasty. However, hip flexion contracture may change pelvic tilt postoperatively by the release of contracture. This study investigated the influence of hip flexion contracture on pelvic sagittal tilt in the supine position.

METHODS

This study included 300 patients who underwent primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty. We divided the participants into two groups: with a preoperative hip extension angle of <0° (hip flexion contracture group) and without (non-contracture group). The pelvic sagittal tilt and femoral flexion angle were investigated using computed tomography or pelvic radiographs performed preoperatively and postoperatively.

RESULTS

The femoral flexion angle had significantly reduced postoperatively in the hip flexion contracture group but remained unchanged in the non-contracture group. The preoperative and postoperative pelvic sagittal tilt showed no significant differences between the two groups up to 1 year postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The influence of hip flexion contracture on the pelvic sagittal tilt in the supine position was minimal. The functional pelvic plane in the supine position could be a good reference to ascertain the cup orientation, even in hip flexion contracture cases.

Functional safe zone for THA considering the patient-specific pelvic tilts: An ultrasound-based approach

The usual Lewinnek orientation for cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty is not suitable for all patients as it does not consider the patient mobility. We propose an ultrasound-based approach to compute a Functional Safe Zone (FSZ) considering daily positions. Our goal was to validate it, and to evaluate how the input parameters impact the FSZ size and barycentre. The accuracy of the FSZ was first assessed by comparing the FSZ computed by the proposed approach and the true FSZ determined by 3D modelling. Then, the input parameters' impact on the FSZ was studied using a principal component analysis. The FSZ was estimated with errors below 0.5° for mean anteversion, mean inclination, and at edges. The pelvic tilts and the neck orientation were found correlated to the FSZ mean orientation, and the target ROM and the prosthesis dimensions to the FSZ size. Integrated into the clinical workflow, this non-ionising approach can be used to easily determine an optimal patient-specific cup orientation minimising the risks of dislocation.

Angular changes in pelvic tilt and cup orientation at a minimum of eighteen years after primary total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented cup

BACKGROUND

Changes in pelvic tilt angle (PTA) and cup orientation have been reported in patients after total hip arthroplasty, but the current literature generally has a brief follow-up period. This study will be the first to report PTA and cup orientation changes in the supine position for a minimum 18 years after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and investigate the factors associated with pelvic tilt and cup orientation changes.

METHODS

In this study, 101 patients (120 hips) who underwent THA were retrospectively analyzed. The aims of our study were to evaluate the PTA and cup orientation change over 18 years after THA to assess differential PTA, cup inclination, and anteversion. We also investigated whether factors such as gender, body mass index, and age have any influence on PTA and cup orientation after THA.

RESULTS

Patients showed a significant incremental change in PTA pre-operatively, immediately post-operatively, and at final follow-up. Cup orientation increased significantly at the final follow-up compared to the immediate post-operative period. Gender subgroup analysis showed that PTA was significantly greater in females than in males at the final follow-up (p = 0.025). Age subgroup analysis showed that PTA was significantly greater in the over 60 years group than in the other groups.

CONCLUSION

Our patients showed significant changes in PTA and cup orientation at a minimum 18 years after surgery, especially in females over 60 years. Female patients over 60 are a risk factor after THA.

The Functional Mechanics of the Acetabular Component in Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty functional safe zones match postural hip changes to dynamic positioning of the acetabular component. We studied integrating the Anteinclination (AI) cup angle into the spinopelvic environment, defining normative values for all parameters and calculating adjustments to AI for each degree of altered standing pelvic position and postural mobility from these values. A sagittal geometric model was employed to determine these values using established spinopelvic parameter angles.

METHODS

Theoretical normative Pelvic Incidence (PI) specific values were calculated using a triangular construct employing a linear equation describing the functional relationship between the pelvic parameters at a mobility producing an isosceles solution for normative acetabular angles. Individual optimal AI cup values for altered Sacral Slope (SS)/pelvic tilt (sPT) and mobility (dSS) were calculated using specific ratios of angular change between parameters correcting from these normative values.

RESULTS

A PI:SS:sPT ratio of angular change of 3:2:1 at dSS = 25° mobility creates an isosceles condition solving for PI specific theoretical normative values for all construct parameters. Individualized tilt correction applies to each posture a +0.25° AI alteration for each +1° sPT increase from this architectural value. Mobility correction applies a +0.5° standing AI and -0.5° sitting AI alteration for each -1° dSS < 25°, the opposite for each +1° dSS > 25°. The Sacroacetabular angle/Pelvic acetabular angle (SAA/PAA) index describes the underlying spinopelvic environment the cup functions within.

CONCLUSION

This model quantitatively integrates an implanted acetabular component into the host spinopelvic environment. Theoretical normative and individual optimal cup orientations are passively determined by these conditions of standing pelvic position and mobility.

Do Spinopelvic Parameters Relate with Secondary Hip Spine Syndrome in Secondary Hip Arthritis?

Background

The prevalence of low back pain (LBP) with primary osteoarthritis (OA) hip undergoing total hip replacement (THA) has been studied. However, secondary OA hip affects younger individuals where changes in the sagittal spinal parameters (SSPs) could be reversible to reduce LBP. The study aims to document changes in clinical and radiological parameters following THA.

Methods

Thirty patients with secondary OA hip were included in the prospective analysis, excluding anyone with previous spine/hip surgery of known spinal diseases, including deformity, inflammatory or infective pathology. Visual analog scale for (VAS) hip and LBP, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and Harris core (HHS) along with SSPs were measured at baseline and three months and analyzed.

Results

 Mean age was 42.8 ± 8.9 years which 17 unilateral (U/L) and 13 bilateral (B/L) OA. Overall, no significant changes were seen in SSPs that included pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) was seen except for an improvement in the sagittal vertical axis (SVA) [40.22 ± 36.67 to 24.06 ± 21.93, p < 0.001]. However, clinical variables such as VAS hip and LBP, ODI, and HHS improved post-hip THA. Similar findings were seen in sub-group analysis when U/L affected were compared to B/L affected.

Conclusion

The sagittal SSPs except SVA does not change significantly following THA in patients with secondary OA, though LBP improves clinically. Hence, we assume routine measurement of these parameters is not mandatory when planning for THA in these patients.

Does Total Hip Arthroplasty Affect Spinopelvic and Spinal Alignment?: A Prospective Observational Investigation

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective observational study, level of evidence 3.

OBJECTIVES

The study with patients undergoing unilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) aimed to evaluate the following hypotheses: (1) the spinal sagittal and coronal alignment alters due to THA, (2) the spinopelvic parameter changes after THA, (3) the spinopelvic alignment differs between sagittal balanced and imbalanced patients.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Surgical correction of spinal sagittal misalignment affects the spinopelvic alignment and pelvic tilt. It is not yet known to what extent THA affects spinopelvic, spinal sagittal, and coronal alignment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 153 patients undergoing THA were assessed with biplanar stereoradiography in standing position preoperatively and postoperatively. Two independent investigators examined C7-sagittal vertical axis (C7-SVA), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch, lumbar lordosis (LL), C7-central sacral vertical line, pelvic oblique angle lumbosacral, intra-pelvic oblique angle, pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), anterior plane pelvic tilt (APPT), and pelvic femoral angle (PFA). An analysis of the sagittal misaligned subgroups of C7-SVA and PI-LL on the influence of the spinopelvic alignment was performed.

RESULTS

A significant difference in spinopelvic parameters was detected in the preoperative to postoperative comparison (SS, PT, APPT, and PFA; P <0.000) ( d =-0.394; d =0.609; d =-0.481; d =0.431). The coronal alignment and pelvic obliquity revealed no significant differences. The misaligned groups (C7-SVA; PI-LL) demonstrated significant increases in PI and PT and decreased in LL compared with the groups with normal sagittal alignment. Preoperatively, 66/153 (C7-SVA) and 46/153 (PI-LL) of the THA patients presented sagittal misalignment, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest an effect of THA on sagittal spinal and spinopelvic alignment, with a significant reduction of PT postoperatively and no effect on coronal alignment. Particularly striking are the significant differences in the misaligned groups, which may be classified as risk population and potentially can contribute biomechanically to a higher risk of posterior impingement and anterior THA dislocation. The substantial proportion of sagittal misaligned patients in the THA collective illustrates the crucial need for interdisciplinary collaboration.

Does spinopelvic motion change after total hip arthroplasty?

PURPOSE

Spinopelvic motion plays an important role in functional acetabular cup position after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Sacral slope (SS) has been a useful surrogate for spinopelvic motion. The present study aimed to investigate statistical characteristics of spinopelvic motion before and after THA using changes in SS in supine, standing, and sitting positions.

METHODS

A total of 76 patients (88 hips) were assessed. To classify spinopelvic mobility, defined as a change in SS from standing to sitting position (ΔSS_stand/sit), 10° ≤ ΔSS_stand/sit ≤ 30°, ΔSS_stand/sit < 10°, and ΔSS_stand/sit > 30° were considered normal, stiff, and hypermobile, respectively.

RESULTS

Over ± 7° changes in SS between before and one year after THA were observed in 39 (44.3%) hips in the sitting position, 19 (21.6%) hips in the supine position, seven (7.9%) in the standing position. Percentages of hips with stiff spinopelvic mobility (11.4% vs. 22.7%) and hypermobile spinopelvic mobility (23.9% vs. 12.5%) between before THA and one year after THA were significantly different (p = 0.034 and p = 0.016, McNemar's test). At one year after THA, 40.0% (4/10) of hips with stiff spinopelvic mobility and 57.1% (12/21) of hips with hypermobile spinopelvic mobility shifted to normal spinopelvic mobility.

CONCLUSIONS

Change in SS between before THA and one year after THA had a high inter-subject variability especially in the sitting position. In addition, there was a distinct shift to normal spinopelvic mobility postoperatively in hips with stiff and hypermobile spinopelvic mobility pre-operatively.

Comparison of Exeter stem offset size for total hip arthroplasty between males and females: A retrospective series of 780 hips

BACKGROUND

Many orthopaedic surgeons use a 'standard' stem offset length, typically 37.5 mm and 44 mm for females and males respectively, in total hip arthroplasty. With increasingly personalized surgery, 'standard' one-size-fits-all stem lengths may be outdated. This study aims to test whether pre-operative templating affects stem length choice and whether 'standard' stem sizes are therefore outdated.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of all total hip arthroplasty patients using Stryker's Exeter cemented femoral hip system in our centre between 2016 and 2020. Demographic and surgical data were collected. Data from surgeons who templated pre-operatively were compared to data from those who did not.

RESULTS

780 patients were included (309 male, 471 female), average age 71.4 years (range 23-96). We found a significant difference between male and female offset lengths; more males had an offset length of 44 mm and more females had an offset length of 37.5 mm (p = 0.004). Among surgeons who did not template pre-operatively, 20.6% of female patients and 10.3% of male patients had other 'non-standard' offset lengths. Among surgeons who did template pre-operatively, the proportion of both female and male patients who had other 'non-standard' offset lengths was significantly higher (43.1% and 23.4%, respectively p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The difference between templating and non-templating surgeons' stem choice revealed significant individual variability between males and females. 'Standard' offset lengths for males and females were still used in the majority of our cohort. However, with the emergence of mainstream robotic arthroplasty, we feel that pre-operative templating has become a minimum standard.

Pelvic tilt impacts cup orientation on CT: how accurate is the gold standard?

BACKGROUND

Computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for the accurate measurement of cup inclination and anteversion in total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, functional cup position strongly depends on the tilt of the pelvis and thus pelvic tilt in the supine position on the CT table harbors the risk of misinterpretation.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of pelvic tilt on cup measurements in postoperative CT scans.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a secondary outcome analysis of a prospective study. In 123 patients undergoing THA, anatomic cup inclination and anteversion as measured on postoperative 3D-CT scans were compared between: (i) the anterior pelvic plane (APP) resembling neutral pelvic tilt; and (ii) the coronal plane representing the standard planes on CT. Furthermore, the effect of the variation on cup positions within Lewinnek's safe zone in relation to the applied reference plane was assessed.

RESULTS

Mean pelvic tilt in supine position was -3.5° ± 5.6°. This resulted in a mean difference for anteversion between APP und coronal plane of 2.1° ± 3.7° and of 2.1° ± 1.9° for cup inclination, respectively. The change varied up to 20.2° for cup inclination and up 12.2° for cup anteversion. The overall conversion rate for inclination and/or anteversion regarding Lewinnek's safe zone was high at 23.6% (29/123).

CONCLUSION

Pelvic tilt affects cup orientation on CT scans depending on the applied reference plane. Standard CT planes should be corrected regarding pelvic tilt before measurements to avoid errors in measurement.

Change of Pelvic Sagittal Tilt after Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Bilateral Crowe Type IV Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Objective

To explore and analyze the change of pelvic sagittal tilt (PST) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with bilateral Crowe type IV developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).

Methods

The study retrospectively evaluated 43 patients with bilateral Crowe type IV DDH undergoing THA from January 2008 to June 2019 who were followed up for 12 months postoperatively. Four parameters, including the ratio between the height and width of the obturator foramina(H/W ratio), the vertical distance between the upper edge of the symphysis and the middle of the sacrococcygeal joint (SSc distance), the vertical distance between the upper edge of the symphysis and the line connecting bilateral hip centers (SC distance) and the vertical distance between the upper edge of the symphysis and the line connecting the bilateral lower ends of the sacroiliac joints (SSi distance), which could indirectly reflect the change of PST, were observed and measured by radiographs. The change of each parameter before operation, immediately after operation, and in 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively was compared and analyzed.

Results

Compared with the value before operation, the H/W ratio immediately after operation and in 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively were 0.61 ± 0.12 (t = 0.893, P = 0.377), 0.61 ± 0.11 (t = 1.622, P = 0.112), 0.67 ± 0.10 (t = 5.995, P < 0.001) and 0.76 ± 0.12 (t = −9.313, P < 0.001), respectively, and the SSc, SC and SSi distance in 6 months postoperatively were 30.12 ± 7.06 mm (t = 3.506, P = 0.002), 42.8 ± 7.7 mm (t = 5.843, P < 0.001), 129.3 ± 12.6 mm (t = 5.888, P < 0.001), respectively, and in 12 months postoperatively were 27.24 ± 7.68 mm (t = 6.510, P < 0.001), 36.1 ± 9.1 mm (t = 9.230, P < 0.001), 118.9 ± 14.9 mm (t = 8.940, P < 0.001), respectively. The radiographs obtained in 6 and 12 months postoperatively demonstrated a significantly increased H/W ratio and decreased SSc, SC and SSi distance. At the last follow‐up, the clinical evaluations significantly improved in all patients and there were no revisions.

Conclusion

The significant change of pelvic sagittal posterior tilt in patients with bilateral Crowe type IV DDH might be a significant phenomenon after THA, which could occur in 6 months postoperatively.

Kinematic pelvic tilt during gait alters functional cup position in total hip arthroplasty

Static pelvic tilt impacts functional cup position in total hip arthroplasty (THA). In the current study we investigated the effect of kinematic pelvic changes on cup position. In the course of a prospective controlled trial postoperative 3D-computed tomography (CT) and gait analysis before and 6 and 12 months after THA were obtained in 60 patients. Kinematic pelvic motion during gait was measured using Anybody Modeling System. By fusion with 3D-CT, the impact of kinematic pelvic tilt alterations on cup anteversion and inclination was calculated. Furthermore, risk factors correlating with high pelvic mobility were evaluated. During gait a high pelvic range of motion up to 15.6° exceeding 5° in 61.7% (37/60) of patients before THA was found. After surgery, the pelvis tilted posteriorly by a mean of 4.0 ± 6.6° (p < .001). The pelvic anteflexion led to a mean decrease of -1.9 ± 2.2° (p < .001) for cup inclination and -15.1 ± 6.1° (p < .001) for anteversion in relation to the anterior pelvic plane (APP). Kinematic pelvic changes resulted in a further change up to 2.3° for inclination and up to 12.3° for anteversion. In relation to the preoperative situation differences in postoperative cup position ranged from -4.4 to 4.6° for inclination and from -7.8 to 17.9° for anteversion, respectively. Female sex (p < .001) and normal body weight (p < .001) correlated with high alterations in pelvic tilt. Kinematic pelvic changes highly impact cup anteversion in THA. Surgeons using the APP as reference should aim for a higher anteversion of about 15° due to the functional anteflexion of the pelvis during gait.

Spinopelvic alignment and low back pain after total hip arthroplasty: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

Spinopelvic alignment is increasingly considered as an essential factor for maintaining an energy-efficient posture in individuals with normal or pathological status. Although several previous studies have shown that changes in the sagittal spinopelvic alignment may occur in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA), no review of this area has been completed so far. Thus, the objective of this scoping review was to summarize the evidence investigating changes in spinopelvic alignment and low back pain (LBP) following THA.

DATA SOURCES

We adhered to the established methodology for scoping reviews. Four electronic databases were systematically searched from inception-December 31, 2021.

STUDY SELECTION

We selected prospective or retrospective observational or intervention studies that included patients with THA.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data extraction and levels of evidence were independently performed using standardized checklists.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A total of 45 papers were included in this scoping review, involving 5185 participants with THA. Pelvic tilt was the most common parameter measured in the eligible studies (n = 26). The results were not consistent across all studies; however, it was demonstrated that the distribution of pelvic tilt following THA had a range of 25° posterior to 20° anterior. Moreover, decreased sacral slope and lower pelvic incidence were associated with increased risk of dislocation in patients with THA. Lumbar spine scoliosis did not change significantly after THA in patients with bilateral hip osteoarthritis (5.50°(1.16°) vs. 3.73°(1.16°); P-value = 0.29). Finally, one study indicated that LBP improvement was not correlated with postoperative changes in spinopelvic alignment parameters. Several methodological issues were addressed in this study, including no sample size calculation and no type-I error adjustment for outcome multiplicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in spinopelvic alignment may occur after THA and may improve with time. Patients with a THA dislocation usually show abnormal spinopelvic alignment compared to patients without a THA dislocation. LBP usually improves markedly over time following THA.

Spinopelvic mobility is influenced by pre-existing contralateral hip arthroplasty: a matched-pair analysis in patients undergoing hip replacement

Background

Spinopelvic mobility gained increased attention as a contributing factor for total hip arthroplasty (THA) instability. However, it is unknown how a pre-existing THA affects spinopelvic mobility. Therefore, a propensity-score-matched analysis of primary THA patients comparing the individual segments of spinopelvic mobility between patients with pre-existing THA and no-existing THA was conducted. Consequently, the study aimed to discuss (1) whether patients with a pre-existing THA have altered spinopelvic mobility compared to the control group and (2) if spinopelvic mobility changes after THA.

Methods

A prospective observational study enrolled 197 elective primary THA patients, including N = 44 patients with a pre-existing unilateral THA. Using propensity-score matching adapted for age, sex, and BMI, N = 44 patients without a pre-existing THA were determined. The patients received stereoradiography in standing and relaxed sitting position pre- and postoperatively. Assessed parameters were lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT), and pelvic femoral angle (PFA). Key parameters of the spinopelvic mobility were defined as lumbar flexibility (∆LL = LL_standing − LL_sitting), pelvic mobility (∆PT = PT_standing − PT_sitting) and hip motion (∆PFA = PFA_standing − PFA_sitting). Pelvic mobility was classified as stiff (∆PT < 10°), normal (∆PT ≥ 10°–30°) and hypermobile (∆PT > 30°). The Wilcoxon rank sum test for dependent samples was used.

Results

Pelvic mobility was significantly increased in the pre-existing THA group (∆PT 18.2° ± 10.7) compared to the control group (∆PT 7.7° ± 8.0; p < 0.001) preoperatively and postoperatively (pre-existing: 22.2° ± 9.3; control: 17.0° ± 9.2, p = 0.022). Lumbar flexibility was significantly increased in the pre-existing THA group (∆LL 21.6° ± 11.8) compared to the control group (∆LL 12.4° ± 7.8; p < 0.001) preoperatively and postoperatively (pre-existing: 25.7° ± 11.0; control: 19.0° ± 10.2; p = 0.011). The contribution of stiff pelvic mobility is distinctly smaller in the pre-existing THA group (25%) than in the control group (75%) preoperatively.

Conclusions

Pre-existing THA is associated with significantly enhanced pelvic mobility and lumbar flexibility. Accordingly, we identified the patients without a pre-existing THA as risk candidates with higher likelihood for pathological spinopelvic mobility. This information will assist arthroplasty surgeons in deciding which THA candidates require preoperative radiological screening for pathologic spinopelvic mobility.

Level of evidence

Level II prospective cohort study.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-022-02945-5.

Utility of Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Positioning of Total Hip Arthroplasty Components Using a Posterior and Direct Anterior Approach

INTRODUCTION

Positioning of implant components for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is important for polyethylene liner wear, prosthesis joint stability, and range of motion. The introduction of fluoroscopy for the direct anterior approach has been shown to improve physician accuracy for component positioning. Few studies compare the use of intraoperative fluoroscopy for THA component positioning in posterior THA. The purpose of this project is to retrospectively evaluate the effect of intraoperative fluoroscopy on component positioning for THA using posterior and direct anterior approach (DAA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of postoperative weight-bearing X-ray films of THAs was performed over a 2-year period where a single fellowship-trained total joint surgeon introduced direct anterior approach into his practice while expanding the intraoperative use of fluoroscopy for all THA procedures, regardless of approach. Component position was evaluated through radiographic measurement of acetabular cup inclination (goal of 40 degrees), limb length discrepancy (goal of 0 mm), and femoral component offset difference (goal of 0 mm). Radiographic analysis was performed by two independent providers. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-tests.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients with an average age of 62 years were identified during the 2-year period surrounding the THA practice change, adding fluoroscopy to posterior and DAA THA. Three cohorts were identified: cohort A: 44 patients who underwent posterior THAs without the use of intraoperative fluoroscopy, cohort B: 35 patients who underwent direct anterior approach THAs with the use of intraoperative fluoroscopy, and cohort C: 18 patients who underwent posterior THAs with the use of intraoperative fluoroscopy. The use of intraoperative fluoroscopy for the posterior approach versus unguided posterior approach increased accuracy of both cup inclination (44 degrees vs 50 degrees, P < .05) and femoral offset (4 mm vs 7 mm, P < .05). A comparison of DAA with fluoroscopy versus posterior approach without fluoroscopy showed improvement in cup inclination (48 degrees vs 50 degrees, P < .05). Fluoroscopy with posterior approach versus fluoroscopy with DAA was found to have improved cup inclination (44 degrees vs 48 degrees, P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative use of fluoroscopy can improve component positioning for posterior THA.

Static and dynamic pelvic kinematics after one-stage bilateral or unilateral total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

The pelvis rotates simultaneously around both hips along sagittal, frontal and transversal planes and its kinematics change in patients after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Consequently, it is reasonable to expect different pelvic kinematic profiles in bilateral or unilateral THA. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare pelvic kinematics in patients with bilateral or unilateral THA.

METHODS

40 patients undergoing bilateral (n = 20) or unilateral (n = 20) THA were evaluated for pelvic kinematics during standing and walking tasks using an optoelectronic system. Mean pelvic orientation was assessed during standing, whereas the Gait Variable Score (GVS), maximum and minimum peaks, range and values of pelvic tilt, obliquity and rotation during Heel-Strike and Toe-Off phases of gait cycle were calculated during walking. Data were collected the day before and at seven days after surgery.

RESULTS

At baseline, no between-group differences were found. At 7 days, GVS for pelvic tilt (p = 0.029) and rotation (p = 0.046) were closer to normative data in bilateral patients, who also revealed lower maximum peak of anterior tilt (p = 0.013) and lower range of pelvic tilt during gait (p = 0.031) with respect to unilateral cases. No between-group differences were found for pelvic orientation during standing at any time-point.

CONCLUSIONS

Bilateral patients revealed more physiological pelvic kinematics than unilateral cases. These findings underline the advantage of patients undergoing 1-stage bilateral THA and may be helpful in selecting personalised rehabilitative approaches.

Characterising acetabular component orientation with pelvic motion during total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Suboptimal acetabular component position can result in impingement, dislocation, and accelerated wear. Intraoperative pelvic motion has led to surgeon error and acetabular cup malposition. This study characterises the relationship between pelvic rotation and postoperative acetabular cup orientation.

METHODS

A device was constructed to allow cadaveric pelvis rotation along three axes about an acetabular cup in fixed orientation. The acetabular cup was fixed in space at 40° of radiographic inclination and 15° of anteversion relative to the anterior pelvic plane to represent consistent surgeon intraoperative placement. Active marker clusters were fixed to surgical equipment while the cadaveric pelvis was cemented with passive reflective markers, both identified with the Optotrak Certus motion capture system. The reamed cadaveric pelvis was rotated along three axes from -45° to 45° of roll, -30° to 30° of tilt, and -35° to 35° of pitch. The change in component inclination and anteversion was recorded at each 5° interval. Using computed tomography 3D reconstruction, the experimental setup was duplicated computationally to assess against a greater range of pelvis and implant sizes.

RESULTS

Radiographic anteversion and inclination showed a non-linear relationship dependent on pelvic roll, tilt, and pitch. Radiographic anteversion changed -0.59°, 0.76° and 0.01° while radiographic inclination changed 0.23°, 0.18° and 1.00° for every 1° of pelvic roll, tilt and pitch, respectively. Computationally, anteversion changed -0.61°, 0.75° and 0.00° while inclination changed 0.22°, 0.19° and 1.00° for every 1° of pelvic roll, tilt and pitch, respectively. These results were independent of cup and pelvis size.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative pelvic motion can significantly affect final cup position, and this should be accounted for when placing acetabular components during total hip arthroplasty. Based on this study, intraoperative adjustment of the acetabular component position based on pelvis motion may be implemented to improve postoperative component position.

Pelvic incidence and pelvic tilt can be calculated using either the femoral heads or acetabular domes in patients with hip osteoarthritis

AIMS

The aim of the study was to compare two methods of calculating pelvic incidence (PI) and pelvic tilt (PT), either by using the femoral heads or acetabular domes to determine the bicoxofemoral axis, in patients with unilateral or bilateral primary hip osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

PI and PT were measured on standing lateral radiographs of the spine in two groups: 50 patients with unilateral (Group I) and 50 patients with bilateral hip OA (Group II), using the femoral heads or acetabular domes to define the bicoxofemoral axis. Agreement between the methods was determined by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the standard error of measurement (SEm). The intraobserver reproducibility and interobserver reliability of the two methods were analyzed on 31 radiographs in both groups to calculate ICC and SEm.

RESULTS

In both groups, excellent agreement between the two methods was obtained, with ICC of 0.99 and SEm 0.3° for Group I, and ICC 0.99 and SEm 0.4° for Group II. The intraobserver reproducibility was excellent for both methods in both groups, with an ICC of at least 0.97 and SEm not exceeding 0.8°. The study also revealed excellent interobserver reliability for both methods in both groups, with ICC 0.99 and SEm 0.5° or less.

CONCLUSION

Either the femoral heads or acetabular domes can be used to define the bicoxofemoral axis on the lateral standing radiographs of the spine for measuring PI and PT in patients with idiopathic unilateral or bilateral hip OA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(8):1345-1350.

Posterior pelvic tilt evolution in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. A minimum 5-years follow-up clinico-radiological study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Pelvic tilt influences the relative position between total hip arthroplasty (THA) components. Changes in lumbar spine over time may affect clinical and radiological outcomes of THA during follow-up. We assessed the evolution of pelvic tilt and cup position after THA for a minimum follow-up of five years and the possible appearance of complications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study includes 48 patients operated between 2008 and 2012. Clinical data, complication and radiological analysis included sacro-femoral-pubic and acetabular abduction angles on the anteroposterior pelvic view; and cup anteversion angle on the lateral cross-table hip view according to Woo and Morrey. All assessments were done pre-operatively and at 6 weeks, one, two and five years post-operatively.

RESULTS

Mean sacro-femoral-pubic decreased from 60.6∘ preoperatively to 58.8∘ at five years (p > .05), more in females (from 63.3 to 59.3) than males (58.7 to 58.3). Acetabular abduction increased from 47.3 at six-week postoperatively to 48.2 at five years (p > .05) and acetabular anteversion varied from 24.3∘ to 36.1∘ (p < .04). There were four dislocations: one late recurrent dislocation which required cup revision.

CONCLUSION

Despite the sacro-femoral-pubic angle tendency to decrease and anteversion tendency to increase after five years, larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm the potential increasing in long term complications.

Applying the hip-spine relationship in total hip arthroplasty

Total hip arthroplasty dislocations that occur inside Lewinnek's anatomical safe zone represent a need to better understand the hip-spine relationship. Unfortunately, the use of obtuse and redundant terminology to describe the hip-spine relationship has made it a relatively inaccessible topic in orthopaedics. However, with a few basic definitions and principles, the hip-spine relationship can be simplified and understood to prevent unnecessary dislocations following total hip arthroplasty.In the following text, we use common language to define a normal and abnormal hip-spine relationship, present an algorithm for recognising and treating a high-risk hip-spine patient, and discuss several common, high-risk hip-spine pathologies to apply these concepts. Simply, high-risk hip-spine patients often require subtle adjustments to acetabular anteversion based on radiographic evaluations and should also be considered for a high-offset stem, dual-mobility articulation, or large femoral head for additional protection against instability and dislocation.

Pelvic motion the key to understanding spine-hip interaction

Pelvic motion acting as a hinge between the spine and hips is essential to maintain proper balance during bipedalism. Pelvic rotation is recruited as a compensation mechanism when spinal malalignment occurs.This pelvic rotation can affect functional acetabular orientation, and consequently functional cup positioning if a total hip arthroplasty (THA) is needed. Pelvic retroversion, frequently associated with degenerative spinal changes, implies an increase of acetabular version.Patients with flexible lumbar spines (spine users) protect the hip joint. Patients with stiff, degenerated or fused lumbar spines (hip users) demand higher hip mobility, placing the THA at risk.Pelvises in retroversion place the THA at risk for anterior dislocation when standing. In contrast, pelvises in anteversion or with low pelvic incidence (PI) can place THA at risk for posterior dislocation when sitting.Try to set the cup in an anatomic position. However, bear in mind that low PI pelvises may need more acetabular ante-inclination, and high PI pelvises more acetabular retroversion.If surgery is needed, start first by addressing the hip, except in patients with compensation (high pelvic retroversion), who may need spine surgery first to place the pelvis, and consequently the acetabulum, in a proper position. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:522-533. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200032.

Preoperative factors improving the prediction of the postoperative sagittal orientation of the pelvis in standing position after total hip arthroplasty

The aims of this study were to investigate if the sagittal orientation of the pelvis (SOP) in the standing position changes after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and evaluate what preoperative factors may improve the prediction of the postoperative standing SOP in the context of a patient-specific functional cup orientation. 196 primary THA patients from Japan were retrospectively selected for this study. Computed tomography imaging of the pelvis, EOS imaging of the lower body and lateral radiographs of the lumbar spine in the standing position were taken preoperatively. Common biometrics and preoperative Harris Hip Score were recorded. The EOS imaging in the standing position was repeated three months following THA. A 3D/2.5D registration process was used to determine the standing SOP. Thirty-three preoperative biometric, morphological and functional parameters were measured. Important preoperative parameters were identified that significantly improve the prediction of the postoperative standing SOP by using multiple linear LASSO regression. On average, the SOP changed significantly (p < 0.001) between the preoperative and postoperative standing position three months after THA by 3° ± 4° in the posterior direction. The age, standing lumbar lordosis angle (LLA) and preoperative supine and standing SOP significantly (p < 0.001) improve the prediction of the postoperative standing SOP. The linear regression model for the prediction of the postoperative standing SOP is significantly (p < 0.001) improved by adding the parameters preoperative standing SOP and LLA, in addition to the preoperative supine SOP, reducing the root mean square error derived from a leave-one-out cross-validation by more than 1°. The mean standing SOP in Japanese patients changes already three months after THA in comparison to the preoperative value. The preoperative factors age, LLA, supine and standing SOP can significantly improve the prediction of the postoperative standing SOP and should be considered within the preoperative planning process of a patient-specific functional cup orientation.

[Intraoperative assessment of pelvic tilt and cup position in total hip arthroplasty: the relevance of navigation and robotics]

The optimal 3D positioning of the prosthesis components is of great importance for the stability and function of a total hip endoprosthesis. Pelvic tilt has a particular influence on the position of the implant. In order to use intraoperatively the knowledge on pelvic kinematics gained through preoperative imaging procedures and movement analyses, "image-based" and "image-free" robotic and navigation procedures are available. With the "image-based" procedures, a 3D CT scan serves as the surgeon's basis for operative planning. The "image-free" procedures are based on the principles of stereotaxy. In the future, information about static and dynamic pelvic tilt will be conntected with navigation and robotic systems for total hip arthroplasty. Along with intraoperative data a patientindividual optimized implant position can be achieved.

Does Functional Cup Orientation Change at Minimum of 10 Years After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

Cup orientation has been shown to influence the postoperative risk of impingement and dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and may change over time due to changes in pelvic tilt that occur with aging. The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a significant change in acetabular cup inclination and anteversion over a 10-year period following THA.

METHODS

A retrospective, multisurgeon, single-center cohort study was conducted of 46 patients that underwent THA between 1995 and 2002. A total of 46 patients were included, with a median age at surgery of 56 years, and a median time between initial postoperative radiograph and the most recent one being 13.5 years (minimum 10 years). Cup orientation was measured from postoperative and follow-up supine anterior-posterior pelvic radiographs. Using a validated software, inclination and anteversion were calculated at each interval and the change in cup anteversion and inclination angle was determined. Furthermore, the difference in the sacro-femoral-pubic angle was measured, reflecting the difference in pelvic tilt between intervals.

RESULTS

No significant difference was detected between measurements taken from initial postoperative radiograph and measurements a minimum of 10 years later (P > .45), with the median (interquartile range) change in anteversion, inclination, and sacro-femoral-pubic being 0° (-1° to 3°), 1° (-3° to 2°), and 0° (-2° to 3°), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our study found no significant change in functional cup orientation a minimum of 10 years after THA. No shifts in functional cup orientation as a result of altering spinopelvic alignment seemed to be present over a 10-year period.

The Impingement-free, Prosthesis-specific, and Anatomy-adjusted Combined Target Zone for Component Positioning in THA Depends on Design and Implantation Parameters of both Components

BACKGROUND

Lewinnek's recommendation for orienting the cup in THA is criticized because it involves a static assessment of the safe zone and because it does not consider stem geometry. A revised concept of the safe zone should consider those factors, but to our knowledge, this has not been assessed.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) To determine the shape, size, and location of target zones for combined cup and stem orientation for a straight stem/hemispheric cup THA to maximize the impingement-free ROM and (2) To determine whether and how these implant positions change as stem anteversion, neck-shaft angle, prosthetic head size and target range of movements are varied.

METHODS

A three-dimensional computer-assisted design model, in which design geometry was expressed in terms of parameters, of a straight stem/hemispheric cup hip prosthesis was designed, its design parameters modified systematically, and each prosthesis model was implanted virtually at predefined component orientations. Functional component orientation referencing to body planes was used: cups were abducted from 20° to 70°, and anteverted from -10° to 40°. Stems were rotated from -10° to 40° anteversion, neck-shaft angles varied from 115° to 143°, and head sizes varied from 28 to 40 mm. Hip movements up to the point of prosthetic impingement were tested, including simple flexion/extension, internal/external rotation, ab/adduction, combinations of these, and activities of daily living that were known to trigger dislocation. For each combination of parameters, the impingement-free combined target zone was determined. Maximizing the size of the combined target zone was the optimization criterion.

RESULTS

The combined target zones for impingement-free cup orientation had polygonal boundaries. Their size and position in the diagram changed with stem anteversion, neck-shaft angle, head size, and target ROM. The largest target zones were at neck-shaft angles from 125° to 127°, at stem anteversions from 10° to 20°, and at radiographic cup anteversions between 17° and 25°. Cup anteversion and stem anteversion were inverse-linearly correlated supporting the combined-anteversion concept. The range of impingement-free cup inclinations depended on head size, stem anteversion, and neck-shaft angle. For a 127°-neck-shaft angle, the lowest cup inclinations that fell within the target zone were 42° for the 28-mm and 35° for the 40-mm head. Cup anteversion and combined version depended on neck-shaft angle. For head size 32-mm cup, anteversion was 6° for a 115° neck-shaft angle and 25° for a 135°-neck-shaft angle, and combined version was 15° and 34° respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The shape, size, and location of the combined target zones were dependent on design and implantation parameters of both components. Changing the prosthesis design or changing implantation parameters also changed the combined target zone. A maximized combined target zone was found. It is mandatory to consider both components to determine the accurate impingement-free prosthetic ROM in THA.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study accurately defines the hypothetical impingement-free, design-specific component orientation in THA. Transforming it into clinical precision may be the case for navigation and/or robotics, but this is speculative, and as of now, unproven.

Pelvic rotation after total hip arthroplasty is dynamic and variable

AIMS

The aims of this study were to determine the change in the sagittal alignment of the pelvis and the associated impact on acetabular component position at one-year follow-up after total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

This study represents the one-year follow-up of a previous short-term study at our institution. Using the patient population from our prior study, the radiological pelvic ratio was assessed in 91 patients undergoing THA, of whom 50 were available for follow-up of at least one year (median 1.5; interquartile range (IQR) 1.1 to 2.0). Anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis were obtained in the standing position preoperatively and at one year postoperatively. Pelvic ratio was defined as the ratio between the vertical distance from the inferior sacroiliac (SI) joints to the superior pubic symphysis and the horizontal distance between the inferior SI joints. Apparent acetabular component position changes were determined from the change in pelvic ratio. A change of at least 5° was considered clinically meaningful.

RESULTS

Pelvic ratio decreased (posterior tilt) in 54.0% (27) of cases, did not change significantly in 34.0% (17) of cases, and increased (anterior tilt) in 12.0% (6) of cases when comparing preoperative to one-year postoperative radiographs. This would correspond with 5° to 10° of abduction error in 22.0% of cases and > 10° of error in 6.0%. Likewise, this would correspond with 5° to 10° of version error in 22.0% of cases and > 10° of error in 44.0%.

CONCLUSION

Pelvic sagittal alignment is dynamic and variable after THA, and these changes persist to the one-year postoperative period, altering the orientation of the acetabular component. Surgeons who individualize the acetabular component placement based on preoperative functional radiographs should consider that the rotation of the pelvis (and thus the component version and inclination) changes one year postoperatively. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(7 Supple B):47-51.

Three-dimensional analysis of acetabular cup orientation and an evaluation of the relationship with pelvic sagittal parameters

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of total hip arthroplasty (THA) on sagittal pelvic parameters and to evaluate the effect of sagittal pelvic parameters on acetabular cup orientation.

METHODS

The study included 86 patients who underwent THA for a diagnosis of unilateral coxarthrosis between 2011 and 2015. Measurements were taken of the preoperative and postoperative acetabular cup inclination (ACI), anteversion, and sagittal pelvic parameters. The effect of THA on sagittal pelvic parameters and the effects of the sagittal pelvic parameters on acetabular cup orientation were investigated.

RESULTS

The sagittal pelvic tilt values calculated were mean 9.7° ± 6.3° (2°; 23°) preoperatively and 11.0° ± 6.1° (2°; 25°) postoperatively. The increase in postoperative pelvic incidence (PI) values was determined to be statistically significant (p < 0.05). The preoperative PI values had no significant effect on ACI, but in cases with high preoperative PI values, a tendency to high anteversion values was determined. The mean inclination values were found to be 40.2° ± 11.0° in the low PI group, 41.7° ± 7.4° in the normal PI group, and 44.1° ± 8.3° in the high PI group. As no increase in inclination values was observed with an increase in PI values, no statistical correlation was determined (p = 0.343). Average of anteversion values in the low PI group was 9.2° ± 13.7°, in the normal PI group 19.3° ± 10.5°, and in the high PI group 21.1° ± 12.5°. The difference between the groups was statistically significant (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Evaluating the results of this study, it can be concluded that varying PI values do affect the acetabular cup anterversion in THA. So, preoperative assessment of PI values is important in preventing postoperative acetabular cup malposition.

Effect of pelvic tilt and rotation on cup orientation in standing anteroposterior radiographs

BACKGROUND

Individual pelvic tilt and rotation have wide variability that can affect the measurement of cup orientation in anteroposterior (AP) radiographs. The purpose of this study was to analyse the effect of pelvic tilt and rotation on radiographic measurements of cup orientation.

METHODS

A total of 53 patients (63 hips) were included in this study. The patients underwent a computed tomography study with standing AP pelvis radiographs taken both preoperatively and approximately 3 months postoperatively. We used 2-dimensional/3-dimensional matching to measure the pelvic tilt and rotation, and the non-standardised and standardised cup orientation.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the pelvic tilt and rotation between the preoperative and postoperative radiographs. The distribution of the differences between the non-standardised and standardised cup anteversion exhibited a change within 5° in only 34/63 (54%) hips. The pelvic tilt correlated with the difference between the non-standardised and standardised cup anteversion, but the pelvic rotation did not. When all 63 hips were separated into the right and left sides, the pelvic rotation inversely correlated with the pelvic tilt-adjusted difference between the non-standardised and standardised cup anteversion of the right side but directly correlated with that of the left side.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study demonstrated that the measurement of cup anteversion in standing AP radiographs is significantly affected by both the pelvic tilt and pelvic rotation. An improved understanding of the pelvic orientation may eventually allow for desired cup positioning on a patient-specific basis to potentially reduce complications associated with the malposition of the cup.

Influence of total hip arthroplasty on sagittal lumbar-pelvic balance: Evaluation of radiographic parameters

Objective  To prospectively analyze the radiographic variables of lumbosacral sagittal balance in the pre- and postoperative period of patients submitted to total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods  A prospective, observational, comparative study that evaluated pre- and postoperative radiographic parameters of 71 patients, submitted to 72 total hip arthroplasties in a 3-year period (2014–2017) for primary coxarthrosis, of whom 28 performed late postoperative control (6 months) through the Surgimap Spine software (Surgimap, New York, NY, USA). Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t-test, the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model, and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). A p-value < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.

Results  A total of 72 cases, presenting a mean age of 57.9 years old, predominantly females (60.6%) and patients > 50 years old (71.8%). There was an overall decrease in lumbar lordosis values in the immediate postoperative period, without major global changes in late evolution. It was found that patients with a pelvic incidence ≥ 60° tended to have their other sagittal balance parameters elevated.

Conclusion  There was no significant difference between the radiographic variables of sagittal lumbopelvic balance in the evaluated periods. Lumbar lordosis and pelvic incidence were the main modifying factors. Improvement of low back pain after THA, without changes in parameters, suggests different pathology mechanisms still to be clarified.

Changes in acetabular orientation during total hip arthroplasty

AIMS

The aims of this study were to determine the change in pelvic sagittal alignment before, during, and after total hip arthroplasty (THA) undertaken with the patient in the lateral decubitus position, and to determine the impact of these changes on acetabular component position.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively compared the radiological pelvic ratio among 91 patients undergoing THA. In total, 41 patients (46%) were female. The mean age was 61.6 years (sd 10.7) and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 20.0 kg/m² (sd 5.5). Anteroposterior radiographs were obtained: in the standing position preoperatively and at six weeks postoperatively; in the lateral decubitus position after trial reduction intraoperatively; and in the supine position in the post-anaesthesia care unit. Pelvic ratio was defined as the ratio between the vertical distance from the inferior aspect of the sacroiliac (SI) joints to the superior pubic symphysis and the horizontal distance between the inferior aspect of the SI joints. Changes in the apparent component position based on changes in pelvic ratio were determined, with a change of > 5° considered clinically significant. Analyses were performed using Wilcoxon's signed-rank test, with p < 0.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

Intraoperatively, in the lateral decubitus position, the pelvic ratio increased (anterior tilt) in 69.4% of cases, did not change significantly in 20.4%, and decreased (posterior tilt) in 10.2% of cases. When six-week postoperative radiographs were compared with preoperative radiographs, the pelvic ratio decreased in 44.9% of cases, did not change significantly in 42.3%, and increased in 12.8% of cases. This change in alignment correlated with a change in acetabular component version of > 5° in 79.6% of cases intraoperatively and 57.7% of cases at six weeks postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Changes in pelvic sagittal pelvic position occur throughout THA that, if unaccounted for, introduce errors in acetabular component placement. The use of intraoperative imaging may help the appropriate placement of the acetabular component. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B(6 Supple B):45-50.

Influence of Spinopelvic Alignment on Pelvic Tilt after Total Hip Arthroplasty

Objective

To evaluate the impact of spinopelvic parameters and hip contracture on change in the pelvic tilt (PT) after Total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods

One hundred patients (15 male and 85 female) who underwent THA were included in this prospective study. Radiographic data were obtained preoperatively and 1 year after THA. Radiographic parameters included sagittal anterior pelvic plane (APP), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), sacral slope (SS), pelvic inclination (PI), and lumbar lordosis angle (LL). The APP was defined as the angle between the anterior pelvic plane and the vertical plane. A positive value indicates pelvic retroversion. Postoperative changes in PT were divided into three groups: the PA group (pelvic anteversion, ΔAPP < −5°), the PR group (pelvic retroversion, ΔAPP > 5°), and the PT group (minimal change, ΔAPP ≤ ± 5°). The Kruskal–Wallis test and the Steel–Dwass test were used to compare the preoperative and postoperative spinopelvic parameters among the three groups. The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the correlation between ΔAPP and spinopelvic parameters.

Results

Minimal change in pelvic tilt was observed in 59% of patients, while pelvic anteversion was observed in 16% of patients and pelvic retroversion was observed in 25% of patients. There were no significant changes in the spinopelvic parameters, including TK, LL, SVA, LL, SS, and APP after THA. The Femoral angle (FA) was significantly decreased after THA (P < 0.001). Preoperative APP was significantly more retroverted in the PA group than the PR group, and the PT group (6.8 ± 12.2, 0.2 ± 9.9, −8.3 ± 8.3, P < 0.001). Preoperative SS, PI‐LL, and PI were significantly smaller in the PA group than the PT group and the PR group. A significant negative correlation was identified between preoperative APP and ΔAPP (r = −0.418, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Approximately 60% of the patients did not have any marked change in PT after THA. Preoperative APP was the only predictive factor associated with marked anterior or posterior change in PT.

Pelvic positioning in the supine position leads to more consistent orientation of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty

Aims

This study aims to: determine the difference in pelvic position that occurs between surgery and radiographic, supine, postoperative assessment; examine how the difference in pelvic position influences subsequent component orientation; and establish whether differences in pelvic position, and thereafter component orientation, exist between total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed in the supine versus the lateral decubitus positions.

Patients and Methods

The intra- and postoperative anteroposterior pelvic radiographs of 321 THAs were included; 167 were performed with the patient supine using the anterior approach and 154 were performed with the patient in the lateral decubitus using the posterior approach. The inclination and anteversion of the acetabular component was measured and the difference (Δ) between the intra- and postoperative radiographs was determined. The target zone was inclination/anteversion of 40°/20° (± 10°). Changes in the tilt, rotation, and obliquity of the pelvis on the intra- and postoperative radiographs were calculated from Δinclination/anteversion using the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm.

Results

The mean postoperative inclination/anteversion was 40° (± 8°)/23° (± 9°) with Δinclination and/or Δanteversion > ± 10° in 74 (21%). Intraoperatively, the pelvis was anteriorly tilted by a mean of 4° (± 10°), internally rotated by a mean of 1° (± 10°) and adducted by a mean of 1° (± 5°). Having Δinclination and/or Δanteversion > ± 10° was associated with a 3.5 odds ratio of having the acetabular component outside the target zone. A greater proportion of THAs that were undertaken with the patient in the lateral decubitus position had Δinclination and/or Δanteversion > ± 10° (35.3%, 54/153) compared with those in the supine position (4.8%, 8/167; p < 0.001). A greater number of acetabular components were within the target zone in THAs undertaken with the patient in the supine position (72%, 120/167), compared with those in the lateral decubitus position (44%, 67/153; p < 0.001). Intraoperatively, the pelvis was more anteriorly tilted (p < 0.001) and more internally rotated (p = 0.04) when the patient was in the lateral decubitus position.

Conclusion

The pelvic position is more reliable when the patient is in the supine position, leading to more consistent orientation of the acetabular component. Significant differences in pelvic tilt and rotation are seen with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1280–8.

Effect of Pelvic Tilt and Rotation on Cup Orientation in Both Supine and Standing Positions

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of pelvic tilt and rotation on radiographic measurement of cup orientation.

METHODS

A total of 68 patients (79 hips) were included in this study. The patients had a computed tomography study and approximately 3 months of postoperative standing anteroposterior pelvic radiographs in both supine and standing positions. We used 2-dimensional (2D)/3-dimensional (3D) matching to measure pelvic tilt and rotation, and cup orientation.

RESULTS

There was a wide range of pelvic tilt between individuals in both supine and standing positions. Supine pelvic tilt was different from standing pelvic tilt (P < .05). There were differences in cup anteversion before and after 2D/3D matching in both supine and standing positions (P < .05). Supine and standing pelvic tilt correlated with differences in cup anteversion before and after 2D/3D matching. When all 79 hips were separated into right and left side, pelvic rotation inversely correlated with the pelvic tilt-adjusted difference in anteversion before and after 2D/3D matching of the right side but directly correlated with that of the left side in both supine and standing positions.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that the measurement of cup anteversion on anteroposterior radiographs is significantly affected by both pelvic tilt and pelvic rotation (depending on the side). Improved understanding of pelvic orientation and improved ability to measure pelvic orientation may eventually allow for desired cup positioning to potentially protect against complications associated with malposition of the cup.

Preoperative Ultrasonographic Assessment of the Anterior Pelvic Plane for Personalized Total Hip Replacement

OBJECTIVES

Correct positioning of the acetabular component is a key factor in minimizing the risk of dislocation after total hip replacement (THR) surgery. A "safe" orientation of the cup is usually defined by 2 angles measured between its geometric axis and the anterior pelvic plane. However, in the current state-of-the-art approach to THR surgery, the intraoperative orientation of the anterior pelvic plane cannot be measured. Even less is known about the functional orientation of the pelvis, which determines the postoperative orientation of the cup during the patient's everyday activities. The aim of this article is to present an original approach to personalized THR surgery, in which the necessary measurements are done preoperatively without interfering with the surgical work flow, and the individual orientation of the cup is obtained without navigation using standard tools that are available in the operating room.

METHODS

To quantify the effect of the anatomic conditions on the final orientation of the cup, we measured the orientation of the anterior pelvic plane in 43 patients scheduled for THR using a newly developed noninvasive method based on ultrasonography and mobile devices.

RESULTS

Our results confirm a large variability of the pelvic orientation in both supine and standing positions. We further show how this variability affects the final position of the cup and discuss its consequences for the patient. Finally, we explore a few practical solutions for individualized cup placement, including our own approach, which is based on tilting of the operating table.

CONCLUSIONS

In this work, we show that the common guidelines used today for cup implantation can only be effectively applied to a small portion of the population. In most cases, it is crucial that the orientation of the cup is readjusted for the particular anatomy of the individual patient.

Pelvic Tilt Displacement Before and After Artificial Hip Joint Replacement Surgery

BACKGROUND

Prediction of pelvic displacement before total hip arthroplasty (THA) is important for accurate acetabular implant placement. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of contralateral joint conditions on pelvic displacement after THA.

METHODS

A total of 355 cases that underwent computed tomography before and after THA for osteoarthritis due to developmental dysplasia were assessed. The pelvic plane was based on preoperative and postoperative day 1 computed tomography images. The displacement in the anteversion direction was expressed as +. Subjects with a minimal joint space <2 mm in the contralateral hip joint were in group N; subjects with ≥2 mm were in group W; subjects with THA were in group P; and subjects who underwent THA simultaneously on both sides were in group B. The Bartlett test was used when conducting the equal variance test among the groups. The F test was used for pairwise comparison. A P value <.01 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Groups N, W, P, and B had 49, 227, 55, and 24 cases, respectively, and their displacements were -0.2° ± 2.7°, 0.8° ± 3.9°, 0.5° ± 2.6°, and 1.1° ± 4.0°, respectively; the variance between the groups was significantly different (P = .0001). The differences between groups W and N (P = .0020), between groups W and P (P = .0003), and between groups P and B (P = .0086) were statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

When the contralateral joint space is wide, the variance of the displacement is high. The contralateral joint affects pelvic displacement.

The Safe Zone Range for Cup Anteversion Is Narrower Than for Inclination in THA

BACKGROUND

Cup malposition is a common cause of impingement, limitation of ROM, acceleration of bearing wear, liner fracture, and instability in THA. Previous studies of the safe zone based on plain radiographs have limitations inherent to measuring angles from two-dimensional projections. The current study uses CT to measure component position in stable and unstable hips to assess the presence of a safe zone for cup position in THA.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Does acetabular component orientation, when measured on CT, differ in stable components and those revised for recurrent instability? (2) Do CT data support historic safe zone definitions for component orientation in THA?

METHODS

We identified 34 hips that had undergone revision of the acetabulum for recurrent instability that also had a CT scan of the pelvis between August 2003 and February 2017. We also identified 175 patients with stable hip replacements who also had a CT study for preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation of the contralateral side. For each CT study, one observer analyzed major factors including acetabular orientation, femoral anteversion, combined anteversion (the sum of femoral and anatomic anteversion), pelvic tilt, total offset difference, head diameter, age, sex, and body mass index. These measures were then compared among stable hips, hips with cup revision for anterior instability, and hips with cup revision for posterior instability. We used a clinically relevant measurement of operative anteversion and inclination as opposed to the historic use of radiographic anteversion and inclination. The percentage of unstable hips in the historic Lewinnek safe zone was calculated, and a new safe zone was proposed based on an area with no unstable hips.

RESULTS

Anteriorly unstable hips compared with stable hips had higher operative anteversion of the cup (44° ± 12° versus 31° ± 11°, respectively; mean difference, 13°; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5°-21°; p = 0.003), tilt-adjusted operative anteversion of the cup (40° ± 6° versus 26° ± 10°, respectively; mean difference, 14°; 95% CI, 10°-18°; p < 0.001), and combined tilt-adjusted anteversion of the cup (64° ± 10° versus 54° ± 19°, respectively; mean difference, 10°; 95% CI, 1°-19°; p = 0.028). Posteriorly unstable hips compared with stable hips had lower operative anteversion of the cup (19° ± 15° versus 31° ± 11°, respectively; mean difference, -12°; 95% CI, -5° to -18°; p = 0.001), tilt-adjusted operative anteversion of the cup (19° ± 13° versus 26° ± 10°, respectively; mean difference, -8°; 95% CI, -14° to -2°; p = 0.014), pelvic tilt (0° ± 6° versus 4° ± 6°, respectively; mean difference, -4°; 95% CI, -7° to -1°; p = 0.007), and anatomic cup anteversion (25° ± 18° versus 34° ± 12°, respectively; mean difference, -9°; 95% CI, -1° to -17°; p = 0.033). Thirty-two percent of the unstable hips were located in the Lewinnek safe zone (11 of 34; 10 posterior dislocations, one anterior dislocation). In addition, a safe zone with no unstable hips was identified within 43° ± 12° of operative inclination and 31° ± 8° of tilt-adjusted operative anteversion.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study supports the notion of a safe zone for acetabular component orientation based on CT. However, the results demonstrate that the historic Lewinnek safe zone is not a reliable predictor of future stability. Analysis of tilt-adjusted operative anteversion and operative inclination demonstrates a new safe zone where no hips were revised for recurrent instability that is narrower for tilt-adjusted operative anteversion than for operative inclination. Tilt-adjusted operative anteversion is significantly different between stable and unstable hips, and surgeons should therefore prioritize assessment of preoperative pelvic tilt and accurate placement in operative anteversion. With improvements in patient-specific cup orientation goals and acetabular component placement, further refinement of a safe zone with CT data may reduce the incidence of cup malposition and its associated complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

Acetabular and Femoral Anteversions in Standing Position are Outside the Proposed Safe Zone After Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Although most hip dislocations occur in either standing or sitting position, the safe zone for implant position is defined for the supine position. Our goal was to determine preoperative and postoperative pelvis and hip orientations and whether the safe zone defined in supine position can be used to assess standing radiographs.

METHODS

Preoperative and postoperative three-dimensional EOS images were assessed in 66 total hip arthroplasty patients. None of the patients had dislocation within the follow-up period (12-36 months). The acetabular anteversion (both anterior pelvic plane [APP] and patient functional plane) and the femoral anteversion were measured. The sacral slope, pelvic version, pelvic inclination, and pelvic incidence were also measured.

RESULTS

Acetabular anteversion increased postoperatively in both APP and patient functional plane (P <.001). Femoral neck anteversion decreased postoperatively (P =.0942). Sacral slope was 42.4° (-25.9° to 24°) preoperatively compared with 40.3° (-4.1° to 64.2°) postoperatively (P =.013). Pelvic version changed from 15.2° (-10.4° to 43.8°) to 17.2° (-6° to 46.7°; P = 0.008). Pelvic inclination was 1.12° (-25.9° to 24°) before total hip arthroplasty and -1.2° (-40.7° to 23.4°) postoperatively (P =.005).

CONCLUSION

The acetabular and femoral implant orientations in standing position reside out of the safe zone in most patients. The APP is not vertical in standing position in most patients due to anterior or posterior pelvic tilt. The proposed safe zone in supine position may not be a useful measure in the assessment of standing radiographs of patients with significant anterior or posterior pelvic tilt.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic case series study.

Quantifying Pelvic Motion During Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a New Surgical Navigation Device

BACKGROUND

Accurate cup positioning is one of the most challenging aspects of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Undetected movement of the patient during THA surgery can lead to inaccuracies in cup anteversion and inclination, increasing the potential for dislocation and revision surgery. Investigations into the magnitude of patient motion during THA are not well represented in the literature.

METHODS

We analyzed intraoperative pelvic motion using a novel navigation device used to assist surgeons with cup position, leg length, and offset during THA. This device uses an integrated accelerometer to measure motion in 2 orthogonal degrees of freedom. We reviewed the data from 99 cases completed between February and September 2016.

RESULTS

The mean amount of pitch recorded per patient was 2.7° (standard deviation, 2.2; range, 0.1°-9.9°), whereas mean roll per patient was 7.3° (standard deviation, 5.5; range, 0.3°-31.3°). Twenty-one percent (21 of 99) of patients demonstrated pitch of >4°. Sixty-nine percent (68 of 99) of patients demonstrated >4° of roll, and 25% (25 of 99) of patients demonstrated roll of ≥10°.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that while the majority of intraoperative motion is <4°, many patients experience significant roll, with a large proportion rolling >10°. This degree of movement has implications for acetabular cup position, as failure to compensate for this motion can result in placement of the cup outside the planned safe zone, thus, increasing the potential for dislocation. Further study is warranted to determine the effect of this motion on cup position, leg length, and offset.

Chronological changes in functional cup position at 10 years after total hip arthroplasty

PURPOSE

This study aims to clarify the chronological changes in functional cup position at a minimum follow-up of 10 years after total hip arthroplasty (THA), and to identify the risk factors influencing a significant difference in functional cup position during the postoperative follow-up period.

METHODS

We evaluated the chronological changes in functional cup position at a minimum follow-up of 10 years after THA in 58 patients with unilateral hip osteoarthritis. Radiographic cup position was measured on anteroposterior pelvic radiographs with the patient in the supine position, whereas functional cup position was recorded in the standing position. Radiographs were obtained before, 3 weeks after, and every 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

Functional cup anteversion (F-Ant) increased over time, and was found to have significantly increased at final follow-up compared to that at 3 weeks after surgery (p<0.01). The maximum postoperative change in F-Ant was 17.0° anteriorly; 12 cases (21%) showed a postoperative change in F-Ant by >10° anteriorly. Preoperative posterior pelvic tilt in the standing position and vertebral fractures after THA were significant predictors of increasing functional cup anteversion.

CONCLUSIONS

Although chronological changes in functional cup position do occur after THA, their magnitude is relatively low. However, posterior impingement is likely to occur, which may cause edge loading, wear of the polyethylene liner, and anterior dislocation of the hip. We believe that, for the combined anteversion technique, the safe zone should probably be 5°-10° narrower in patients predicted to show considerable changes in functional cup position compared with standard cases.