Meta-analysis of methylcobalamin alone and in combination with prostaglandin E1 in the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy

Using corneal confocal microscopy to compare Mecobalamin intramuscular injections vs oral tablets in treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a RCT

This randomized controlled study used corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) to compare the efficacy of Mecobalamin intramuscular injections vs oral tablets in treating mild to moderate diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) by detecting early nerve fiber repair. Enrolled patients were randomized approximately 1:1 to receive Mecobalamin intramuscular injections (0.5 mg/day, 3 times/week) or Mecobalamin oral tablets (1.5 mg/day) for 8 weeks. Primary outcome was change of inferior whorl length (IWL) from baseline. Secondary outcomes included changes of corneal nerve fibre length (CNFL), corneal nerve fibre density (CNFD), corneal nerve branch density (CNBD) and the Survey of Autonomic Symptoms (SAS). 15 (93.75%) patients in the injection group and 17 (89.47%) patients in the tablet group completed the study. The injection treatment significantly improved patients' IWL from baseline (21.64 ± 3.00 mm/mm2 vs 17.64 ± 4.83 mm/mm2, P < 0.01) while the tablet treatment didn't. Additionally, the injection treatment led to significantly improved CNFL, CNBD and SAS from baseline (all P < 0.05) while the tablet treatment did not. No patient experienced any adverse events. In conclusion, CCM is sensitive enough to detect the superior efficacy of 8-week Mecobalamin intramuscular injection treatment for DPN compared to the oral tablet treatment.ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT04372316 (30/04/2020).

B vitamins as a treatment for diabetic pain and neuropathy

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

B vitamin therapy is a common treatment for diabetic pain and neuropathy, yet its use remains controversial in patients lacking B vitamin deficiencies. The aim of this review was to summarize the current evidence for the efficacy of B vitamin therapy in diabetic patients with neuropathy.

COMMENT

We screened the English literature for clinical studies evaluating B vitamins as a therapy for pain and neuropathy in diabetic patients. We selected 43 relevant studies for qualitative analysis based on our selection criteria. Our survey of the literature revealed substantive heterogeneity with respect to efficacies of reported outcomes, as well as study design. Most beneficial outcomes were reported against baseline measures, with few positive comparisons against placebo. This highlights the need for larger, placebo-controlled studies.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

B vitamins should be considered a plausible therapy for diabetic neuropathy, but its overall efficacy remains uncertain and requires further study.

Efficacy and Safety of Mecobalamin on Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of mecobalamin on peripheral neuropathy. Background: Mecobalamin is an active form of vitamin B12 that has been suggested to be beneficial in improving nerve conduction and neuropathic pain symptoms. Although it is already widely used in Asia for the treatment of peripheral neuropathies, its efficacy remains unclear. Methods: Relevant electronic databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials investigating the efficacy and safety of mecobalamin on peripheral neuropathy, from inception through December 2019. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. The clinical therapeutic efficacy, pain score, neuropathic symptom score, nerve conduction velocities (NCVs), and adverse events of mecobalamin were assessed and were pooled by using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by I² and chi-squared tests. Results: Fifteen studies with 1707 peripheral neuropathy patients caused by diabetic peripheral neuropathy and herpetic neuropathy were included. Based on Cochrane's risk of bias criteria, most of the included studies (11/15, 73%) were rated high risk of bias, whereas 20% and 7% were rated some concerns and low risk of bias, respectively. In terms of the proportion of patients achieving clinical therapeutic efficacy, mecobalamin alone (risk ratio [RR] = 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.33) and mecobalamin in combination (RR = 1.32; 95% CI 1.21-1.45) are more effective than active control. For NCV outcomes, only mecobalamin combination treatment was effective. Neither mecobalamin alone nor mecobalamin in combination is effective on the pain score and neuropathic symptom outcomes. No serious adverse events associated with mecobalamin were reported during the treatment periods. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that mecobalamin in combination may be effective in improving clinical therapeutic efficacy and NCV outcomes for peripheral neuropathy patients, but the evidence is not clear for mecobalamin alone. More high-quality studies are required to confirm this finding.

Prostaglandin E1 plus methylcobalamin combination therapy versus prostaglandin E1 monotherapy for patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Prostaglandin E1 (P) or methylcobalamin (M) treatment has been suggested as a therapeutic approach for diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) in many clinical trial reports. However, the combined effects of 2 drugs still remain dubious.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this report was to evaluate the efficacy of M plus P (M + P) for the treatment of DPN compared with that of P monotherapy, in order to provide a reference resource for rational drug use.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of M + P for DPN published up to September 2017 were searched. Risk ratio (RR), mean difference (MD), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated and heterogeneity was assessed with the I test. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also performed. The outcomes measured were as follows: the clinical efficacy, median motor nerve conduction velocities (MNCV), median sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV), peroneal MNCV, peroneal SNCV, and adverse effects.

RESULTS

Sixteen RCTs with 1136 participants were included. Clinical efficacy of M + P combination therapy was significantly better than P monotherapy (fifteen trials; RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.18-1.32, P < .00001, I = 27%). Compared with P monotherapy, the pooled effects of M + P combination therapy on nerve conduction velocity were (MD 6.29, 95% CI 4.63-7.94, P < .00001, I = 90%) for median MNCV, (MD 5.68, 95% CI 3.53-7.83, P < .00001, I = 94%) for median SNCV, (MD 5.36, 95% CI 3.86-6.87, P < .00001, I = 92%) for peroneal MNCV, (MD 4.62, 95% CI 3.48-5.75, P < .00001, I = 86%) for peroneal SNCV. There were no serious adverse events associated with drug intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

M + P combination therapy was superior to P monotherapy for improvement of neuropathic symptoms and NCVs in DPN patients. Moreover, no serious adverse events occur in combination therapy.

Fasudil combined with methylcobalamin or lipoic acid can improve the nerve conduction velocity in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Fasudil (F) plus methylcobalamin (M) or lipoic acid (L) treatment has been suggested as a therapeutic approach for diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) in numerous studies. However, the effect of the combined use still remains dubious.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this report was to evaluate the efficacy of F plus M or L (F + M or F + L) for the treatment of DPN compared with that of M or L monotherapy, respectively, in order to provide the basis and reference for clinical rational drug use.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of F for DPN published up to September 2017 were searched. Relative risk (RR), mean difference (MD), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated and heterogeneity was assessed with the I test. Sensitivity analyses were also performed. The outcomes measured were as follows: the clinical efficacy, median motor nerve conduction velocities (NCVs) (MNCVs), median sensory NCV (SNCV), peroneal MNCV, peroneal SNCV, and adverse effects.

RESULTS

Thirteen RCTs with 1148 participants were included. Clinical efficacy of F + M combination therapy was significantly better than M monotherapy (8 trials; RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.17-1.35, P < .00001, I = 0%), the efficacy of F + L combination therapy was also obviously better than L monotherapy (4 trials; RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.16-1.39, P < .00001, I = 0%). Compared with monotherapy, the pooled effects of combination therapy on NCV were (MD 6.69, 95% CI 4.74-8.64, P < .00001, I = 92%) for median MNCV, (MD 6.71, 95% CI 1.77-11.65, P = .008, I = 99%) for median SNCV, (MD 4.18, 95% CI 2.37-5.99, P < .00001, I = 94%) for peroneal MNCV, (MD 5.89, 95% CI 3.57-8.20, P < .00001, I = 95%) for peroneal SNCV. Furthermore, there were no serious adverse events associated with drug intervention.

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy with F plus M or L was superior to M or L monotherapy for improvement of neuropathic symptoms and NCVs in DPN patients, respectively. Moreover, no serious adverse events occur in combination therapy.

The clinical efficacy of epalrestat combined with α-lipoic acid in diabetic peripheral neuropathy: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a common long-term complication of diabetes mellitus, affecting patients in the world. Epalrestat combined with α-lipoic acid (ALA) is the most frequent combine therapy used in the DPN researches. We aim to assess the effectiveness and safety of epalrestat combined with ALA in patients with DPN, compare with epalrestat alone.

METHODS

We will search Cochrane Library, PubMed, Wanfang Data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP Chinese Science and Technology Journals Database, and Chinese Biomedical Database from inception until October 31th, 2017. Inclusion the randomized controlled trials and clinical control trials of combine therapy which evaluate clinical efficacy and side effect in people with DPN. Data extraction and risk of bias assessments will be independently conducted by 2 reviewers. The primary outcome measures will be total effective rate, motor nerve conduction velocity (MNCV), sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV), Toronto clinical scoring system (TCSS), and total symptom score (TSS). All statistical analyses will be performed using RevMan V.5.3 software.

RESULTS

This review will evaluate the total effective rate, nerve conduction velocity, TCSS, TSS, and safety of ALA combined with epalrestat for patients with DPN, compare with epalrestat alone.

CONCLUSION

Our study will provide evidence to assess whether epalrestat combined with ALA is an optional treatment for patients with DPN.

Efficacy and safety of prostaglandin E1 plus lipoic acid combination therapy versus monotherapy for patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy

The aim of this report was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) plus lipoic acid (LA) for the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) compared with that of PGE1 or LA monotherapy. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) published up to 3 August 2014 were reviewed. A random or fixed effect model was used to analyze outcomes expressed as risk ratios (RR) or mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). I(2) statistic was used to assess heterogeneity. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed. The outcomes measured were as follows: clinical efficacy, median motor nerve conduction velocity (MNCV), median sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV), peroneal MNCV, peroneal SNCV and adverse effects. Thirty-one RCT with 2676 participants were included. Clinical efficacy of PGE1+LA combination therapy was significantly better than monotherapy (p<0.00001, RR=1.32, 95% CI 1.26 to 1.38). Compared with monotherapy, PGE1+LA combination therapy led to significant improvements in median MNCV (p<0.00001, MD=4.69, 95% CI 3.16 to 6.23), median SNCV (p<0.00001, MD=5.46, 95% CI 4.04 to 6.88), peroneal MNCV (p<0.00001, MD=5.19, 95% CI 3.71 to 6.67) and peroneal SNCV (p<0.00001, MD=5.50, 95% CI 3.30 to 7.70). There were no serious adverse events associated with drug intervention. PGE1+LA combination therapy is superior to PGE1 or LA monotherapy for improvement of neuropathic symptoms and nerve conduction velocities in patients with DPN. These findings should be further validated by larger well-designed and high-quality RCT.

Treatment of vitamin B12 deficiency-methylcobalamine? Cyancobalamine? Hydroxocobalamin?-clearing the confusion

Vitamin B12 (cyancobalamin, Cbl) has two active co-enzyme forms, methylcobalamin (MeCbl) and adenosylcobalamin (AdCbl). There has been a paradigm shift in the treatment of vitamin B12 deficiency such that MeCbl is being extensively used and promoted. This is despite the fact that both MeCbl and AdCbl are essential and have distinct metabolic fates and functions. MeCbl is primarily involved along with folate in hematopiesis and development of the brain during childhood. Whereas deficiency of AdCbl disturbs the carbohydrate, fat and amino-acid metabolism, and hence interferes with the formation of myelin. Thereby, it is important to treat vitamin B12 deficiency with a combination of MeCbl and AdCbl or hydroxocobalamin or Cbl. Regarding the route, it has been proved that the oral route is comparable to the intramuscular route for rectifying vitamin B12 deficiency.