Diabetes in patients with acromegaly treated with pegvisomant: observations from acrostudy

Diabetes mellitus secondary to endocrine diseases: a position statement of the working group of the club of the Italian society of endocrinology (SIE)-Nutrition hormones and metabolism

PURPOSE

This position statement addressed the limited scientific literature on the management of diabetes mellitus secondary to endocrinopathies, despite its frequent occurrence in hormonal diseases such as acromegaly, Cushing's syndrome, primary hyperaldosteronism, pheochromocytoma, hyperthyroidism, and neuroendocrine tumors. The aim was to review the pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical features, and management strategies, focusing on nutritional and pharmacological approaches.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of existing literature was conducted regarding studies on diabetes secondary to endocrinopathies and the effects of treatments for these conditions, such as somatostatin analogues and pancreatic surgery. Particular emphasis was placed on understanding glucose metabolism derangements and the interplay between endocrine excess and therapeutic interventions.

RESULTS

Secondary diabetes arises not only from hormone excess but also as a consequence of treatments for endocrine disorders. For instance, somatostatin analogues, while effective in resolving hormone hypersecretion, impair glucose metabolism by inhibiting pancreatic insulin secretion. Similarly, pancreatic surgery for neuroendocrine tumors often exacerbates glycemic disturbances. The management of secondary diabetes requires a multidisciplinary approach that includes treating the underlying endocrine disorder, tailoring antidiabetic therapy, and optimizing nutritional strategies to mitigate metabolic disruptions.

CONCLUSION

Diabetes secondary to endocrinopathies presents unique challenges due to its complex etiology and the metabolic effects of treatments. This position statement underscores the importance of an integrated management approach, offering guidance for clinicians in addressing this multifaceted condition. Further research is needed to develop evidence-based guidelines for optimal care.

Acromegaly and Cardiovascular Disease: Associated Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Cardiovascular Prognosis, and Therapeutic Impact

Acromegaly is a chronic disease characterized by the excessive production of growth hormone (GH), resulting in elevated levels of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1). It is associated with a significantly increased risk of cardiovascular complications, including arrhythmias and acromegalic cardiomyopathy, which are major contributors to morbidity and mortality in patients with acromegaly. Providing a comprehensive analysis of the cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular diseases associated with acromegaly, as well as examining their impact on prognosis and therapeutic strategies that can improve cardiovascular health in these patients, is key to understanding the magnitude of the problem and optimizing clinical management. The presence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors such as diabetes (with a prevalence ranging from 22.3% to 76.8%), hypertension (from 18% to 77%), and dyslipidemia (up to 61%) is worsened by disease activity and duration, increasing the likelihood of adverse cardiovascular events. Early diagnosis and effective treatment are critical to alleviating these complications, as the normalization of GH and IGF-1 levels can improve cardiovascular prognosis. In addition, comprehensive management, including the control of cardiovascular risk factors and regular assessment of cardiac function, is essential. Data suggest that with appropriate treatment, the incidence of myocardial infarction and stroke can be similar to that in the general population. In conclusion, paying careful attention to cardiovascular complications in patients with acromegaly will not only enhance their quality of life, but may also increase their life expectancy through the effective management of comorbidities associated with this disease.

Differential Impact of Medical Therapies for Acromegaly on Glucose Metabolism

Acromegaly is a rare endocrine disorder caused by excessive growth hormone (GH) production, due, in the vast majority of cases, to the presence of a GH-secreting pituitary tumour. The chronic elevation of GH and the resulting high circulating levels of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) cause the characteristic tissue overgrowth and a number of associated comorbidities, including several metabolic changes, such as glucose intolerance and overt diabetes mellitus (DM). Elevated GH concentrations directly attenuate insulin signalling and stimulate lipolysis, decreasing glucose uptake in peripheral tissues, thus leading to the development of impaired glucose tolerance and DM. Acromegaly treatment aims to normalize plasma GH and IGF-1 levels using surgery, medical treatment, or radiotherapy. The effect of the different medical therapies on glucose homeostasis varies. This literature review explores the impact of the currently available pharmacological therapies for acromegaly (first- and second-generation somatostatin receptor ligands, a GH receptor antagonist, and dopamine agonists) on glucose homeostasis. We also discuss the underlying biological mechanisms through which they impact glucose metabolism.

Acromegaly: diagnostic challenges and individualized treatment

INTRODUCTION

Acromegaly is due in almost all cases to a GH-secreting pituitary tumor. GH and IGF-1 excesses lead to its multi-system clinical manifestations and comorbidities. Acromegaly is under-diagnosed and typically presents with advanced disease. When early or mild, clinical recognition and biochemical confirmation are especially challenging. Individualized treatment may optimize patient outcome.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers challenges to diagnosing acromegaly and reviews therapies for acromegaly with a focus on those aspects that can be individualized.

EXPERT OPINION

The first step in diagnosing acromegaly is recognizing it clinically. To improve this, increase awareness and education of the general population and healthcare professionals about the acromegaly phenotype is needed. Once suspected clinically, IGF-1 measurement is the initial step in making the biochemical diagnosis. GH may be < 1.0 µg/L after oral glucose suppression in early/mild cases. GH and IGF-1 should be considered in concert. Providers should be aware of conditions that can alter GH and IGF-1 levels and each assay's performance. An individualized treatment approach is best employed. Surgery is preferred as initial treatment and medical therapy as initial adjuvant therapy. In individualizing therapy, the advantages and disadvantages of each option and predictors of response to them should be considered.

Treatment of acromegaly-induced diabetes: an updated proposal

Acromegaly-induced diabetes presents unique features due to the direct effects of excess growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-) on glucose metabolism, especially insulin resistance in association to low body fat content and water retention. Increased cardiovascular risk is much higher when acromegaly is complicated with diabetes, thus requiring a holistic management that addresses also these specific characteristics which differ from those of classical type 2 diabetes.The optimal management of diabetes in acromegaly requires not only an effective control of carbohydrate disturbances per se, but also the concurrent control of GH hypersecretion as it will directly impact on glucose control. If surgical treatment is not effective to normalize GH and IGF-1 levels, pharmacologic therapy for acromegaly must consider the metabolic effects that the different drugs may induce, as some of them may worsen carbohydrate metabolism. When treating acromegaly-induced diabetes, a comprehensive approach is essential, incorporating medications that may also protect against acromegaly associated comorbidities. Metformin remains the first-line therapy due to its ability to reduce hepatic glucose production enhance insulin sensitivity and its cost effectiveness. The newer drug classes, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, offer benefits similar to those seen in type 2 diabetes, but the unique metabolic profile of acromegaly-including an enhanced ketogenic state and the effects of incretins on GH secretion-have to be considered as it may influence outcomes. Understanding the distinct pathophysiology of acromegaly-induced diabetes and the benefits of these newer drug classes for the patient with acromegaly is crucial for optimizing treatment outcomes and improving the quality of life.

Pasireotide-induced hyperglycemia in Cushing's disease and Acromegaly: A clinical perspective and algorithms proposal

Pasireotide is an effective treatment for both Cushing's disease (CD) and acromegaly due to its ability to suppress adrenocorticotropic hormone and growth hormone, and to normalize insulin-like growth factor-1 levels, resulting in tumor shrinkage. However, it may also cause hyperglycemia as a side effect in some patients. The aim of this study was to review previous recommendations regarding the management of pasireotide-induced hyperglycemia in patients with CD and acromegaly and to propose efficient monitoring and treatment algorithms based on recent evidence and current guidelines for type 2 diabetes treatment. In about 25% of patients with CD and 50% of patients with acromegaly, pasireotide-induced hyperglycemia does not require drug therapy or can be managed with diet and oral antidiabetic agents. The risk of pasireotide-induced hyperglycemia is higher in patients with diabetes or prediabetes at baseline. Moreover, pasireotide used in the treatment of CD may lead to more frequent and difficult-to-treat glycemic disorders than those observed in acromegaly. Based on the pathomechanism of hyperglycemia, we suggest using metformin as the first-line therapy, followed by glucagon-like peptide-1 and/or sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor, and finally insulin in patients with pasireotide-induced hyperglycemia. We propose algorithms for the management of glucose metabolic disorders caused by pasireotide treatment in patients with CD and acromegaly, including those with chronic kidney disease and at high cardiovascular risk.

Acromegaly in humans and cats: Pathophysiological, clinical and management resemblances and differences

OBJECTIVE

Acromegaly is a disorder associated with excessive levels of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1). In general, GH/IGF-1 excess leads to morphologic craniofacial and acral changes as well as cardiometabolic complications, but the phenotypic changes and clinical presentation of acromegaly differ across species. Here, we review the pathophysiology, clinical presentation and management of acromegaly in humans and cats, and we provide a systematic comparison between this disease across these different species.

DESIGN

A comprehensive literature review of pathophysiology, clinical features, diagnosis and management of acromegaly in humans and in cats was performed.

RESULTS

Acromegaly is associated with prominent craniofacial changes in both species: frontal bossing, enlarged nose, ears and lips, and protuberant cheekbones are typically encountered in humans, whereas increased width of the head and skull enlargement are commonly found in cats. Malocclusion, prognathism, dental diastema and upper airway obstruction by soft tissue enlargement are reported in both species, as well as continuous growth and widening of extremities resulting in osteoarticular compromise. Increase of articular joint cartilage thickness, vertebral fractures and spine malalignment is more evident in humans, while arthropathy and spondylosis deformans may also occur in cats. Generalized organomegaly is equally observed in both species. Other similarities between humans and cats with acromegaly include heart failure, ventricular hypertrophy, diabetes mellitus, and an overall increased cardiometabolic risk. In GH-secreting pituitary tumours, local compressive effects and behavioral changes are mostly observed in humans, but also present in cats. Cutis verticis gyrata and skin tags are exclusively found in humans, while palmigrade/plantigrade stance may occur in some acromegalic cats. Serum IGF-1 is used for acromegaly diagnosis in both species, but an oral glucose tolerance test with GH measurement is only useful in humans, as glucose load does not inhibit GH secretion in cats. Imaging studies are regularly performed in both species after biochemical diagnosis of acromegaly. Hypophysectomy is the first line treatment for humans and cats, although not always available in veterinary medicine.

CONCLUSION

Acromegaly in humans and cats has substantial similarities, as a result of common pathophysiological mechanisms, however species-specific features may be found.

Long-term Pegvisomant Therapy of Acromegaly: Effects on Bone Density, Turnover and Microstructure Using HRpQCT

Context

Fracture rate is increased in patients with active acromegaly and those in remission. Abnormalities of bone microstructure are present in patients with active disease and persist despite biochemical control after surgery. Effects of treatment with the GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant on bone microstructure were unknown.

Methods

We studied 25 patients with acromegaly (15 men, 10 women). In 20, we evaluated areal bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and bone turnover markers (BTMs) longitudinally, before and during pegvisomant treatment. After long-term pegvisomant in 17, we cross-sectionally assessed volumetric BMD, microarchitecture, stiffness, and failure load of the distal radius and tibia using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT) and compared these results to those of healthy controls and 2 comparison groups of nonpegvisomant-treated acromegaly patients, remission, and active disease, matched for other therapies and characteristics.

Results

In the longitudinal study, areal BMD improved at the lumbar spine but decreased at the hip in men after a median ∼7 years of pegvisomant. In the cross-sectional study, patients on a median ∼9 years of pegvisomant had significantly larger bones, lower trabecular and cortical volumetric density, and disrupted trabecular microarchitecture compared to healthy controls. Microstructure was similar in the pegvisomant and acromegaly comparison groups. BTMs were lowered, then stable over time.

Conclusion

In this, the first study to examine bone microstructure in pegvisomant-treated acromegaly, we found deficits in volumetric BMD and microarchitecture of the peripheral skeleton. BTM levels remained stable with long-term therapy. Deficits in bone quality identified by HRpQCT may play a role in the pathogenesis of fragility in treated acromegaly.

Consensus on criteria for acromegaly diagnosis and remission

PURPOSE

The 14th Acromegaly Consensus Conference was convened to consider biochemical criteria for acromegaly diagnosis and evaluation of therapeutic efficacy.

METHODS

Fifty-six acromegaly experts from 16 countries reviewed and discussed current evidence focused on biochemical assays; criteria for diagnosis and the role of imaging, pathology, and clinical assessments; consequences of diagnostic delay; criteria for remission and recommendations for follow up; and the value of assessment and monitoring in defining disease progression, selecting appropriate treatments, and maximizing patient outcomes.

RESULTS

In a patient with typical acromegaly features, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I > 1.3 times the upper limit of normal for age confirms the diagnosis. Random growth hormone (GH) measured after overnight fasting may be useful for informing prognosis, but is not required for diagnosis. For patients with equivocal results, IGF-I measurements using the same validated assay can be repeated, and oral glucose tolerance testing might also be useful. Although biochemical remission is the primary assessment of treatment outcome, biochemical findings should be interpreted within the clinical context of acromegaly. Follow up assessments should consider biochemical evaluation of treatment effectiveness, imaging studies evaluating residual/recurrent adenoma mass, and clinical signs and symptoms of acromegaly, its complications, and comorbidities. Referral to a multidisciplinary pituitary center should be considered for patients with equivocal biochemical, pathology, or imaging findings at diagnosis, and for patients insufficiently responsive to standard treatment approaches.

CONCLUSION

Consensus recommendations highlight new understandings of disordered GH and IGF-I in patients with acromegaly and the importance of expert management for this rare disease.

Acromegalic Cardiomyopathy: An Entity on its own? The Effects of GH and IGF-I Excess and Treatment on Cardiovascular Risk Factors

Acromegaly is a chronic disease resulting from constantly elevated concentrations of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I). If not adequately treated, GH and IGF-I excess is associated with various cardiovascular risk factors. These symptoms mainly include hypertension and impaired glucose metabolism, which can be observed in approximately one-third of patients. Other comorbidities are dyslipidemia and the presence of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. However, even in the absence of conventional cardiovascular risk factors, myocardial hypertrophy can occur, which reflects the impact of GH and IGF-I excess itself on the myocardium and is defined as acromegalic cardiomyopathy. Whereas previous echocardiography-based studies reported a high prevalence of cardiomyopathy, this prevalence is much lower in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging-based studies. Myocardial hypertrophy in acromegaly is due to a homogeneous increase in the intracellular myocardial mass and extracellular myocardial matrix and improves following successful treatment through intracellular changes. Intramyocardial water retention or ectopic lipid accumulation might not be of relevant concern. Successful treatment significantly improves myocardial morphology, as well as cardiovascular risk factors. In addition to GH/IGF-I-lowering therapy, the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular complications is crucial for the successful management of acromegaly.

Efficacy and Safety of Pegvisomant in the Treatment of Acromegaly

Pegvisomant, the first and currently only clinically available growth hormone receptor antagonist, is an effective therapeutic option for the medical treatment of acromegaly, a rare disorder characterized by excessive growth hormone secretion. With now over 20 years of real world experience, its safety and efficacy is well-established. However, several aspects of its clinical use are still controversially discussed. The high cost of pegvisomant has limited its use in several countries, and recent studies have reported a lower efficacy than the initial clinical trials. A reported increase in tumor volume under therapy varies between studies and has been attributed to either actual growth or re-expansion after cessation of somatostatin receptor ligand therapy. Furthermore, different combinations of pegvisomant and other therapeutic agents aiming at reduction of acromegaly disease activity have been proposed to increase or retain effectiveness while lowering side effects and cost. This review aims to assess current clinical data on the safety and efficacy of pegvisomant while also addressing controversies surrounding its use.

Position statement on the diagnosis and management of acromegaly: The French National Diagnosis and Treatment Protocol (NDTP)

Acromegaly is a rare disease with prevalence of approximately 60 cases per million, slight female predominance and peak onset in adults in the fourth decade. Clinical diagnosis is often delayed by several years due to the slowly progressive onset of symptoms. There are multiple clinical criteria that define acromegaly: dysmorphic syndrome of insidious onset, symptoms related to the pituitary tumor (headaches, visual disorders), general signs (sweating, carpal tunnel syndrome, joint pain, etc.), complications of the disease (musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, pneumological, dental, metabolic comorbidities, thyroid nodules, colonic polyps, etc.) or sometimes clinical signs of associated prolactin hypersecretion (erectile dysfunction in men or cycle disorder in women) or concomitant mass-induced hypopituitarism (fatigue and other symptoms related to pituitary hormone deficiencies). Biological confirmation is based initially on elevated IGF-I and lack of GH suppression on oral glucose tolerance test or an elevated mean GH on repeated measurements. In confirmed cases, imaging by pituitary MRI identifies the causal tumor, to best determine management. In a minority of cases, acromegaly can be linked to a genetic predisposition, especially when it occurs at a young age or in a familial context. The first-line treatment is most often surgical removal of the somatotroph pituitary tumor, either immediately or after transient medical treatment. Medical treatments are most often proposed in patients not controlled by surgical removal. Conformal or stereotactic radiotherapy may be discussed on a case-by-case basis, especially in case of drug inefficacy or poor tolerance. Acromegaly should be managed by a multidisciplinary team, preferably within an expert center such as a reference or skill center for rare pituitary diseases.

Practical therapeutic approach in the management of diabetes mellitus secondary to Cushing's syndrome, acromegaly and neuroendocrine tumours

Cushing's syndrome, acromegaly and neuroendocrine disorders are characterized by an excess of counterregulatory hormones, able to induce insulin resistance and glucose metabolism disorders at variable degrees and requiring immediate treatment, until patients are ready to undergo surgery. This review focuses on the management of diabetes mellitus in endocrine disorders related to an excess of counterregulatory hormones. Currently, the landscape of approved agents for treatment of diabetes is dynamic and is mainly patient-centred and not glycaemia-centred. In addition, personalized medicine is more and more required to provide a precise approach to the patient's disease. For this reason, we aimed to define a practical therapeutic algorithm for management of diabetes mellitus in patients with glucagonoma, pheochromocytoma, Cushing's syndrome and acromegaly, based on our practical experience and on the physiopathology of the specific endocrine disease taken into account. This document is addressed to all specialists who approach patients with diabetes mellitus secondary to endocrine disorders characterized by an excess of counterregulatory hormones, in order to take better care of these patients. Care and control of diabetes mellitus should be one of the primary goals in patients with an excess of counterregulatory hormones requiring immediate and aggressive treatment.

Secondary diabetes mellitus in acromegaly

Secondary diabetes mellitus (DM) is a common complication of acromegaly, encountered in up to 55% of cases. Vice versa, the prevalence of acromegaly is markedly higher in cohorts of patients with type 2 DM (T2DM). The presence of secondary DM depends primarily on acromegaly status and is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity, malignancy rate and overall mortality. The principal pathophysiologic mechanism is increased insulin resistance due to excessive lipolysis and altered fat distribution, reflected at the presence of intermuscular fat and attenuated, dysfunctional adipose tissue. Insulin resistance is ascribed to the direct, diabetogenic effects of growth hormone (GH), which prevail over the insulin-sensitizing effects of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), probably due to higher glucometabolic potency of GH, IGF-1 resistance, or both. Inversely, GH and IGF-1 act synergistically in increasing insulin secretion. Hyperinsulinemia in portal vein leads to enhanced responsiveness of liver GH receptors and IGF-1 production, pointing towards a mutually amplifying loop between GH-IGF-1 axis and insulin. Secondary DM occurs upon beta cell exhaustion, principally due to gluco-lipo-toxicity. Somatostatin analogues inhibit insulin secretion; especially pasireotide (PASI) impairs glycaemic profile in up to 75% of cases, establishing a separate pathophysiologic entity, PASI-induced DM. In contrast, pegvisomant and dopamine agonizts improve insulin sensitivity. In turn, metformin, pioglitazone and sodium-glucose transporters 2 inhibitors might be disease-modifying by counteracting hyperinsulinemia or acting pleiotropically. Large, prospective cohort studies are needed to validate the above notions and define optimal DM management in acromegaly.

Patient-reported outcomes in patients with acromegaly treated with pegvisomant in the ACROSTUDY extension: A real-world experience

PURPOSE

To report the effects of pegvisomant (PEGV) treatment on patient-reported outcomes in acromegaly patients.

METHODS

We conducted an extension study of an open-label, multinational, non-interventional study (ACROSTUDY) evaluating the long-term safety and efficacy of PEGV for acromegaly in routine clinical practice. Enrolled patients were rollover patients from ACROSTUDY, or treatment naïve/semi-naïve (NSN; no PEGV within 6 months of enrollment). Exploratory efficacy endpoints were changes in symptoms with the Patient-Assessed Acromegaly Symptom Questionnaire (PASQ) and quality of life with the Acromegaly Quality of Life questionnaire (AcroQoL) analyzed by controlled or uncontrolled IGF-I levels. Results were analyzed in all patients, in NSN patient subgroup, and by diabetes status.

RESULTS

A total of 544 patients with acromegaly were enrolled, including 434 rollover subjects from ACROSTUDY and 110 NSN patients. Mean PEGV treatment duration was 7.8 years (range, 0-19.6 years). Overall, the majority of PASQ scores improved over time, but there was no significant difference between IGF-I controlled or uncontrolled groups. In the NSN subgroup, most PASQ and AcroQoL scores remained similar to baseline up to 1 year, regardless of IGF-I control. Patients with diabetes reported better PASQ scores over time with PEGV treatment, regardless of IGF-I control. IGF-I normalization increased from 10% of patients at baseline to more than 78% at year 10, with a mean daily PEGV dose of 18.7 mg.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, patients treated with PEGV had small improvements in PASQ. While IGF-I normalization increased with PEGV treatment, IGF-I control had no effects on PASQ and AcroQoL scores.

Prevalence of comorbidities and concomitant medication use in acromegaly: analysis of real-world data from the United States

PURPOSE

Patients receiving treatment for acromegaly often experience significant associated comorbidities for which they are prescribed additional medications. We aimed to determine the real-world prevalence of comorbidities and concomitant medications in patients with acromegaly, and to investigate the association between frequency of comorbidities and number of concomitantly prescribed medications.

METHODS

Administrative claims data were obtained from the IBM® MarketScan® database for a cohort of patients with acromegaly, identified by relevant diagnosis codes and acromegaly treatments, and a matched control cohort of patients without acromegaly from January 2010 through April 2020. Comorbidities were identified based on relevant claims and assessed for both cohorts.

RESULTS

Overall, 1175 patients with acromegaly and 5875 matched patients without acromegaly were included. Patients with acromegaly had significantly more comorbidities and were prescribed concomitant medications more so than patients without acromegaly. In the acromegaly and control cohorts, respectively, 67.6% and 48.4% of patients had cardiovascular disorders, the most prevalent comorbidities, and 89.0% and 68.3% were prescribed > 3 concomitant medications (p < 0.0001). Hypopituitarism and hypothalamic disorders, sleep apnea, malignant neoplasms and cancer, and arthritis and musculoskeletal disorders were also highly prevalent in the acromegaly cohort. A moderate, positive correlation (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.60) was found between number of comorbidities and number of concomitant medications in the acromegaly cohort.

CONCLUSION

Compared with patients without acromegaly, patients with acromegaly have significantly more comorbidities and are prescribed significantly more concomitant medications. Physicians should consider the number and type of ongoing medications for individual patients before prescribing additional acromegaly treatments.

Personalized Medical Treatment in Patients with Acromegaly: A Review

Acromegaly is associated with significant morbidity and mortality if not appropriately treated. In addition to insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and growth hormone (GH) normalization, and tumor shrinkage, treatment goals include symptom relief, managing complications and improving quality of life. Surgical resection is a first-line treatment in most patients, with few being pretreated pre-operatively with medications. Somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs), injectable and more recently oral capsules, have been the cornerstone of first-line medical therapy for persistent disease. However, several factors, including sparsely granulated adenomas, absent/low somatostatin receptor (SSTR2) status, imaging T2-hyperintensity, young age and aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein mutations could predict first-generation SRL resistance. Patients with these characteristics may be better candidates for the GH receptor antagonist, pegvisomant, or in cases of large tumors the second-generation SRL, pasireotide. Combination therapy should be further pursued in patients who remain biochemically uncontrolled or have high remnant tumor after monotherapy. An efficacious and cost-effective pegvisomant dose-sparing effect of SRLs when used in combination has been demonstrated. With such a wide array of medical treatment options, it is increasingly important to tailor treatment to patients' unique characteristics as well as preferences, with a goal of personalizing management to achieve high quality outcomes.

More than a decade of real-world experience of pegvisomant for acromegaly: ACROSTUDY

OBJECTIVE

To report the final long-term safety and efficacy analyses of patients with acromegaly treated with pegvisomant from the ACROSTUDY.

DESIGN

Global (15 countries), multicentre, non-interventional study (2004-2017).

METHODS

The complete ACROSTUDY cohort comprised patients with acromegaly, who were being treated with pegvisomant (PEGV) prior to the study or at enrolment. The main endpoints were long-term safety (comorbidities, adverse events (AEs), pituitary tumour volumes, liver tests) and efficacy (IGF1 changes).

RESULTS

Patients (n = 2221) were treated with PEGV for a median of 9.3 years (range, 0-20.8 years) and followed up for a median of 7.4 years (range, 0-13.9 years). Before PEGV, 96.3% had received other acromegaly treatments (surgery/radiotherapy/medications). Before PEGV treatment, 87.2% of patients reported comorbidities. During ACROSTUDY, 5567 AEs were reported in 56.5% of patients and of these 613 were considered treatment-related (in 16.5% of patients) and led to drug withdrawal in 1.3%. Pituitary imaging showed a tumour size increase in 7.1% of patients; the majority (71.1%) reported no changes. Abnormal AST or ALT liver tests occurred in 3.2% of patients. IGF1 normalization rate improved over time, increasing from 11.4% at PEGV start to 53.7% at year 1, and reaching 75.4% at year 10 with the use of ≥30 mg PEGV/day in an increasing proportion of patients.

CONCLUSION

This comprehensive review of the complete cohort in ACROSTUDY confirmed the overall favourable benefit-to-risk profile and high efficacy of PEGV as mono- and combination therapy in patients with an aggressive course/uncontrolled/active acromegaly requiring long-term medical therapy for control.

A Pituitary Society update to acromegaly management guidelines

Guidelines and consensus statements ensure that physicians managing acromegaly patients have access to current information on evidence-based treatments to optimize outcomes. Given significant novel recent advances in understanding acromegaly natural history and individualized therapies, the Pituitary Society invited acromegaly experts to critically review the current literature in the context of Endocrine Society guidelines and Acromegaly Consensus Group statements. This update focuses on how recent key advances affect treatment decision-making and outcomes, and also highlights the likely role of recently FDA-approved therapies as well as novel combination therapies within the treatment armamentarium.

The Effect of 6 Months' Treatment With Pasireotide LAR on Glucose Metabolism in Patients With Resistant Acromegaly in Real-World Clinical Settings

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate glucose metabolism, as measured by glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels and the need for antidiabetic medical treatment, in patients with acromegaly resistant to first-generation somatostatin receptors ligands (SRLs) treated with pasireotide long-acting release (LAR) in real-world clinical practice. Biochemical control of acromegaly, as measured by growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels, was also assessed.

STUDY DESIGN

Two-center retrospective cohort of consecutive patients with acromegaly treated with first-generation SRLs at maximum doses, who had not achieved biochemical disease control. After SRLs were discontinued, patients were given pasireotide LAR 40 mg i.m. every 28 days. The dose was increased to 60 mg i.m. in patients for whom adequate control was not achieved after 3 months. Patients were given dietary and lifestyle advice, and antihyperglycemic treatment was modified as needed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Biochemical disease control parameters (GH and IGF-1 concentration), as well as HbA1c level at baseline and after 6 months.

RESULTS

In total, 39 patients with acromegaly were enrolled. GH concentration decreased (Δ_me =-1.56 µg/L, range -21.38-3.62, p <0.001) during 6 months of pasireotide LAR treatment. A worsening of metabolic status was observed, with an increase of median HbA1c (Δ_me =0.40%, range -0.20%-2.30%, p <0.001), and antihyperglycemic treatment intensification in 23 (59.0%) patients. The median decline in IGF-1 concentration was: -283.0 µg/L, range -682.7-171.6, p <0.001. IGF-1 reached the age- and gender-specific upper level of normal in 23 (59%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Pasireotide LAR is an effective therapeutic option in patients with acromegaly refractory to first-generation SRLs. However, this therapy may result in pasireotide LAR-associated hyperglycemia, which requires early and aggressive antidiabetic medical therapy to prevent glucose homeostasis alterations.

Effects of growth hormone receptor antagonism and somatostatin analog administration on quality of life in acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

Acromegaly is associated with impaired quality of life (QoL). We investigated the effects of biochemical control of acromegaly by growth hormone receptor antagonism vs somatostatin analog therapy on QoL.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

PATIENTS

116 subjects: n = 55 receiving a somatostatin analog (SSA group); n = 29 receiving pegvisomant (PEG group); n = 32 active acromegaly on no medical therapy (ACTIVE group).

MEASUREMENTS

Acromegaly QoL Questionnaire (AcroQoL), Rand 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) and Gastrointestinal QoL Index (GIQLI); fasting glucose, insulin and IGF-1 levels (LC/MS, Quest Diagnostics).

RESULTS

There were no group differences in mean age, BMI or sex [(whole cohort mean ± SD) age 52 ± 14 years, BMI 30 ± 6 kg/m² , and male sex 38%]. Mean IGF-1 Z-scores were higher in ACTIVE (3.9 ± 1.0) vs SSA and PEG, which did not differ from one another (0.5 ± 0.7 and 0.5 ± 0.7, P < .0001 vs ACTIVE). Eighty-three per cent of PEG previously received somatostatin analogs, which had been discontinued due to lack of efficacy (52%) or side effects (41%). There were no differences in the four QoL primary end-points (AcroQoL Global Score, SF-36 Physical Component Summary Score, SF-36 Mental Health Summary Score and GIQLI Global Score) between SSA and PEG. Higher HbA1c, BMI and IGF-1 Z-scores were associated with poorer QoL in several domains.

CONCLUSION

Our data support a comparable QoL in patients receiving pegvisomant vs somatostatin analogs, despite the fact that the vast majority receiving pegvisomant did not respond to or were not able to tolerate somatostatin analogs.

Multidisciplinary management of acromegaly: A consensus

The 13th Acromegaly Consensus Conference was held in November 2019 in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, and comprised acromegaly experts including endocrinologists and neurosurgeons who considered optimal approaches for multidisciplinary acromegaly management. Focused discussions reviewed techniques, results, and side effects of surgery, radiotherapy, and medical therapy, and how advances in technology and novel techniques have changed the way these modalities are used alone or in combination. Effects of treatment on patient outcomes were considered, along with strategies for optimizing and personalizing therapeutic approaches. Expert consensus recommendations emphasize how best to implement available treatment options as part of a multidisciplinary approach at Pituitary Tumor Centers of Excellence.

Hypertension in Acromegaly in Relationship to Biochemical Control and Mortality: Global ACROSTUDY Outcomes

CONTEXT

Hypertension is a major cardiovascular risk factor related to increased mortality in acromegaly. Surgical cure of acromegaly is associated with improvement in blood pressure levels, however little is known about the effect of pegvisomant (PEGV) treatment in patients with hypertension. This analysis evaluates outcomes in patients with hypertension and acromegaly included in ACROSTUDY.

METHODS

ACROSTUDY is a global non-interventional surveillance study of long-term treatment with PEGV, monitoring its safety and efficacy. The cohort was retrospectively divided in two subgroups: patients with and without hypertension. Stepwise logistic regression and Kaplan-Meyer analyses were performed for testing predictors of mortality.

RESULTS

The total cohort included 2,090 patients with acromegaly treated with PEGV who were followed for a median of 6.8 years (range up to 12.1 years). In ACROSTUDY there were 1,344 patients with hypertension (52.3% males). This subgroup was older, had a higher BMI, and higher prevalence of diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) when compared to patients without hypertension. During ACROSTUDY, 68 deaths were reported in the hypertension cohort, vs 10 in the cohort without hypertension. Both CVD (p<0.0001) and anterior pituitary deficiencies (p=0.0105) at study entry independently predicted mortality in patients with acromegaly and hypertension; Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed that CVD significantly impairs survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypertension is common in patients with acromegaly and significantly increases mortality, especially when there is concomitant CVD. These data suggest that treatment goals should extend beyond IGF-I normalization, and include optimisation of substitution of pituitary deficiencies and scrutinous screening and treatment of CVD.

Insulin Resistance in Patients With Acromegaly

Acromegaly is characterized by chronic overproduction of growth hormone (GH) that leads to insulin resistance, glucose intolerance and, ultimately, diabetes. The GH-induced sustained stimulation of lipolysis plays a major role not only in the development of insulin resistance and prediabetes/diabetes, but also in the reduction of lipid accumulation, making acromegaly a unique case of severe insulin resistance in the presence of reduced body fat. In the present review, we elucidate the effects of GH hypersecretion on metabolic organs, describing the pathophysiology of impaired glucose tolerance in acromegaly, as well as the impact of acromegaly-specific therapies on glucose metabolism. In addition, we highlight the role of insulin resistance in the development of acromegaly-associated complications such as hypertension, cardiac disease, sleep apnea, polycystic ovaries, bone disease, and cancer. Taken together, insulin resistance is an important metabolic hallmark of acromegaly, which is strongly related to disease activity, the development of comorbidities, and might even impact the response to drugs used in the treatment of acromegaly.