Long-term IGF-1 monitoring in prolactinoma patients treated with cabergoline might not be indicated

Gender differences in prolactin thresholds and their association with lactotroph adenoma invasiveness for potential treatment considerations

Recent trends in first-line transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) for prolactinoma patients aim to reduce long-term dependence on dopamine agonists (DA). Key factors linked to poor surgical outcomes include cavernous sinus invasiveness and high baseline serum prolactin (PRL) levels. Defining simple PRL threshold values to indicate invasiveness and inform treatment strategy is crucial. In this retrospective cohort study of 149 prolactinoma patients treated with first-line transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) or dopamine agonist (DA) therapy, we evaluated preoperative prolactin (PRL) levels and cavernous sinus invasion as factors associated with long-term remission. Bayesian modeling identified cohort-wide and gender-specific PRL thresholds associated with invasiveness. Preoperative PRL values strongly correlated with cavernous sinus invasion (AUROC = 0.95; 95% CI: 0.90-0.98). The cohort-wide PRL threshold was 431.9 µg/L (95% CI: 181.1-708.3 µg/L), with gender-specific thresholds of 280.8 µg/L (95% CI: 51.0-528.2 µg/L) for women and 1325.0 µg/L (95% CI: 667.2-2582.9 µg/L) for men. Female thresholds were lower and less affected by age and obesity, while male thresholds were influenced by these factors, particularly in young, obese men. These findings suggest that gender-specific PRL thresholds may be useful for improving specificity and sensitivity in identifying invasiveness, potentially aiding clinical decisions. Personalized treatment informed by preoperative biomarkers is essential for optimizing outcomes and reducing DA reliance, but it should be considered in conjunction with a comprehensive clinical evaluation.

Characteristics and outcomes of men with erectile dysfunction as the presenting symptom due to a lactotroph adenoma

PURPOSE

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is frequently underreported in men suffering from prolactinomas and can be challenging to manage. Both dopamine agonists (DAs) and transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) correct hyperprolactinemia and restore gonadal function. However, there is scarce data regarding their effectiveness in correcting ED over the long term.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective single-center comparative cohort study analyzing men diagnosed with prolactinomas, both with and without confirmed erectile dysfunction (ED) at diagnosis. Independent risk factors for persistent ED over the long term were examined using multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among the 39 men with lactotroph adenomas, ED was one of the presenting symptoms in 22 (56%). The mean age at diagnosis was 45 ± 12 years. Surgery was the primary treatment in 6 (27%) ED patients and 8 (47%) non-ED patients. After a mean follow-up of 74 ± 48 months, remission from hyperprolactinemia was achieved in the majority (76%) of men: 71% in the non-ED cohort and 81% in the ED group (p = 0.70), regardless of the primary treatment strategy (surgical 84% versus medical 72%, p = 0.46). Long-term remission of ED was noted in 16 (73%) patients. Interestingly, high baseline BMI levels emerged as potential risk factors for persistent ED over the long term (OR 1.4, 95%CI 1.0-1.9; p = 0.04), while neither the initial adenoma size nor the primary treatment strategy (i.e., TSS vs. DAs) reached statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Correcting hyperprolactinemia and its associated hypogonadism significantly improves ED in the majority of men with prolactinomas over the long term, regardless of the primary treatment strategy employed. In addition to addressing endocrine deficiencies, the early initiation of weight control programs may be considered for men with lactotroph adenomas and ED. Although our study suggests an association between BMI and the risk of persistent ED, further research is needed to establish any causal relationships.

Paradoxical effect of dopamine-agonists on IGF-1 in patients with prolactinoma: the role of weight

PURPOSE

An increase of IGF-1 has been reported during therapy with dopamine agonists (DA) for prolactinomas; in such cases a correct diagnosis is pivotal to avoid an unnecessary reduction or withdrawal of DA, which are needed to maintain normal prolactin levels. This study was aimed to measure IGF-1 levels, at baseline and during follow-up, in a cohort of patients with prolactinoma, treated with cabergoline, stratified by body mass index.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 35 patients (15 F/20 M; age m ± SD, years: 43.4 ± 13.7) with prolactinoma (21 microadenomas and 14 macroadenomas) who were followed-up at the Endocrinology Unit, in Siena, and with available pituitary hormone assessment at baseline and during follow-up (m ± SD, years: 2.74 ± 0.55).

RESULTS

IGF-1 increased in the whole cohort, but remaining within normal range, except two patients, in whom acromegaly was ruled out with oral glucose tolerance test. After dividing patients by weight, this trend was confirmed only in subjects with overweight and obesity (OV/OB) (p = 0.04). Interestingly, the reduction of prolactin levels was significantly greater in the OV/OB compared to normal-weight patients (median decrease of 97.5% versus 88.2%, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Since DA and normalization of prolactin are known to improve insulin sensitivity, we speculated they have favored the increase of IGF-1 in OV/OB. Our results should be confirmed and the hypothesis proven by further studies.

[Acromegaly screening in patients with hyperprolactinemia and pituitary adenoma]

BACKGROUND

Hyperprolactinemia accompanies growth hormone hypersecretion in approximately 25-39% of cases. There is a recommendation to determine the level of prolactin in clinical guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly. However, there is no understanding of the necessity to investigate the IGF-1 level in patients with hyperprolactinemia and a pituitary adenoma.

AIM

Determining the proportion of patients with hyperprolactinemia and pituitary adenoma, who were examined for IGF-1 levels, and identifying the proportion of patients with acromegaly among this cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between December 2019 and December 2022 a single-center observational single-stage single-sample uncontrolled study was conducted. At the first stage of the study, the proportion of patients with pituitary adenoma and hyperprolactinemia with studied IGF-1 levels was determined, according to medical records. At the second stage of the study, patients without known indicators of IGF-1 were determined. The concentration of growth hormone was studied during the oral glucose load in the case of increased IGF-1 levels.

RESULTS

At the first stage, 105 patients were included in the study. The level of IGF-1 was determined in 41/105 (39%) cases. There were 22/41 (53.7%) cases in the subgroup with pituitary incidentalomas and 19/64 (29.7%) cases in the subgroup with hyperprolactinemia among them. At the second stage, the IGF-1 level was additionally determined in 53 patients with hyperprolactinemia and pituitary adenoma (total 94 patients). The level of IGF-1 was elevated in 11/94 patients, further acromegaly was confirmed in 3/94 patients (3.2%).

CONCLUSION

In real clinical practice the level of IGF-1 is studied only in 39% of cases in patients with pituitary adenoma and hyperprolactinemia. The disease was detected in 3 cases (3.2%) out of 94 people with hyperprolactinemia and pituitary adenoma without clinical manifestations of acromegaly. We consider the study of IGF-1 levels justified as a screening for acromegaly in patients with hyperprolactinemia and pituitary adenoma.

Prolactinomas in adolescent and elderly patients-A comparative long-term analysis

Objectives

Prolactinomas represent the most common type of secreting pituitary adenomas, yet are rarely encountered in adolescent-onset (AO; i.e. <18 years) or elderly-onset (EO; i.e. ≥65 years) cohorts. As a result, it is not clear whether long-term strategies should be focused differently at both age extremes when comparing their therapeutic outcomes. We aimed at investigating long-term endocrinological outcomes, looking for differences between the two cohorts and evaluating the dependence on continued dopamine agonist (DA) therapy.

Methods

Retrospective cross-sectional comparative study analyzing prolactinoma patients with a follow-up of ≥4 years. Clinical, radiological and biochemical characteristics were assessed at diagnosis and last follow-up. Longitudinal endocrinological outcomes between groups of extreme ages (i.e. AO and EO) and middle age (i.e. ≥18 years to 65 years) were compared. Independent risk factors for long-term dependence on DAs were calculated.

Results

Follow-up at ≥4 years was recorded for 108 prolactinoma patients; 10 patients with AO and 10 patients with EO. Compared to AO patients, EO patients were predominantly men (p = 0.003), and presented with significantly higher prolactin (PRL) levels (p = 0.05) and higher body mass index (p = 0.03). We noted a significant positive correlation between patients' PRL values and their age (r = 0.5, p = 0.03) or BMI (r = 0.6, p = 0.03). After a median follow-up of 115 months, remission was noted in 87 (83%) patients; 9 (90%) in AO patients, and 7 (70%) in EO patients (p = 0.58). Continuation of DAs was required in 4 patients (40%) with AO and 7 patients (70%) with EO (p = 0.37). Patients with elderly-onset were an independent predictor of long-term dependence on DAs (HR 2.8, 95% CI 1.1-7.2, p = 0.03).

Conclusions

Long-term control of hyperprolactinemia and hypogonadism does not differ between members of the AO and EO cohorts, and can be attained by the majority of patients. However, adjuvant DAs are often required, independent of the age of onset. Considering the clinical significance of persistent DA therapy for the control of hyperprolactinemia in many patients at both extremes of age, long-term monitoring may become recommended, in particular in patients with elderly-onset.

Machine Learning for Outcome Prediction in First-Line Surgery of Prolactinomas

BACKGROUND

First-line surgery for prolactinomas has gained increasing acceptance, but the indication still remains controversial. Thus, accurate prediction of unfavorable outcomes after upfront surgery in prolactinoma patients is critical for the triage of therapy and for interdisciplinary decision-making.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether contemporary machine learning (ML) methods can facilitate this crucial prediction task in a large cohort of prolactinoma patients with first-line surgery, we investigated the performance of various classes of supervised classification algorithms. The primary endpoint was ML-applied risk prediction of long-term dopamine agonist (DA) dependency. The secondary outcome was the prediction of the early and long-term control of hyperprolactinemia.

METHODS

By jointly examining two independent performance metrics - the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) and the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) - in combination with a stacked super learner, we present a novel perspective on how to assess and compare the discrimination capacity of a set of binary classifiers.

RESULTS

We demonstrate that for upfront surgery in prolactinoma patients there are not a one-algorithm-fits-all solution in outcome prediction: different algorithms perform best for different time points and different outcomes parameters. In addition, ML classifiers outperform logistic regression in both performance metrics in our cohort when predicting the primary outcome at long-term follow-up and secondary outcome at early follow-up, thus provide an added benefit in risk prediction modeling. In such a setting, the stacking framework of combining the predictions of individual base learners in a so-called super learner offers great potential: the super learner exhibits very good prediction skill for the primary outcome (AUROC: mean 0.9, 95% CI: 0.92 - 1.00; MCC: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.60 - 1.00). In contrast, predicting control of hyperprolactinemia is challenging, in particular in terms of early follow-up (AUROC: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.50 - 0.83) vs. long-term follow-up (AUROC: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.58 - 0.97). It is of clinical importance that baseline prolactin levels are by far the most important outcome predictor at early follow-up, whereas remissions at 30 days dominate the ML prediction skill for DA-dependency over the long-term.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the performance benefits of combining a diverse set of classification algorithms to predict the outcome of first-line surgery in prolactinoma patients. We demonstrate the added benefit of considering two performance metrics jointly to assess the discrimination capacity of a diverse set of classifiers.

First-line surgery in prolactinomas: lessons from a long-term follow-up study in a tertiary referral center

CONTEXT

Although consensus guidelines recommend dopamine agonists (DAs) as the first-line approach in prolactinomas, some patients may opt instead for upfront surgery, with the goal of minimizing the need for continuation of DAs over the long term. While this approach can be recommended in selected patients with a microprolactinoma, the indication for upfront surgery in macroprolactinomas remains controversial, with limited long-term data in large cohorts. We aimed at elucidating whether first-line surgery is equally safe and effective for patients with micro- or macroprolactinomas not extending beyond the median carotid line (i.e., Knosp grade ≤ 1).

METHODOLOGY

Retrospective study of patients with prolactinomas Knosp grade ≤ 1 treated with upfront surgery. The primary endpoint was patients' dependence on DAs at last follow-up. The secondary endpoint was postoperative complications. Independent risk factors for long-term dependence on DAs were analyzed.

RESULTS

A microadenoma was noted in 45 patients (52%) and a macroadenoma in 41 (48%), with 17 (20%) harboring a Knosp grade 1 prolactinoma. Median follow-up was 80 months. First-line surgery resulted in long-term remission in 31 patients (72%) with a microprolactinoma and in 18 patients (45%) with a macroprolactinoma (p = 0.02). DA therapy was ultimately required in 11 patients (24%) with microadenomas vs. 20 (49%) with macroadenomas (p = 0.03). As for the latter, DA was required in 13 patients (76%) with Knosp grade 1 macroadenomas vs. 7 patients (29%) with Knosp grade 0 macroadenomas (p = 0.004). There was no mortality, and morbidity was minimal. Knosp grade 1 prolactinomas (OR 7.3, 95% CI 1.4-37.7, p = 0.02) but not adenoma size (i.e., macroprolactinomas) were an independent predictor of long-term dependence on DAs.

CONCLUSIONS

First-line surgery in patients with microprolactinomas or macroprolactinomas Knosp grade 0 resulted in a good chance of non-dependency on DA therapy. However, in patients with prolactinomas Knosp grade 1, first-line surgery cannot be recommended, as adjuvant DA therapy after surgery is required in the majority of them over the long term.

Lateral one-third gland resection in Cushing patients with failed adenoma identification leads to low remission rates: long-term observations from a small, single-center cohort

BACKGROUND

Currently, there are no guidelines for neurosurgeons treating patients with Cushing's disease (CD) when intraoperative adenoma identification is negative. Under these circumstances, a total hypophysectomy or hemi-hypophysectomy on the side indicated by inferior petrosal sinus sampling (IPSS) is the approach being used, although there is a subsequent risk of hypopituitarism. Data on whether one-third lateral pituitary gland resection results in cure of hypercortisolism and low rates of hypopituitarism remain inconclusive.

METHODS

Retrospective single-center study of CD patients with failed intraoperative adenoma identification and subsequent resection of the lateral one-third of the pituitary gland as predicted by IPSS. We assessed (i) histopathological findings, (ii) early and long-term remission rates, and (iii) rates of additional pituitary hormone insufficiency.

RESULTS

Ten women and three men met the inclusion criteria. At 3 months, remission was noted in six (46%) patients: three (23%) had histologically confirmed adenomas, two (15%) had ACTH hyperplasia, and one patient (8%) was positive for Crooke's hyaline degeneration. New pituitary hormone deficits were noted in two patients (15%). After a median (±SD) follow-up of 14±4 years, recurrence was noted in two (15%) patients. Long-term control of hypercortisolism was attained by 10 patients (77%), with additional therapies required in nine (69%) of them.

CONCLUSIONS

In CD patients with failed intraoperative adenoma visualization, lateral one-third gland resection resulted in low morbidity and long-term remission in 31% of patients without the need for additional therapies. Bearing in mind the sample size of this audit, the indication for lateral one-third-gland resection has to be critically appraised and discussed with the patients before surgery.

Impact of primary medical or surgical therapy on prolactinoma patients' BMI and metabolic profile over the long-term

•

High prolactin (PRL) levels are associated with weight gain and impaired metabolic profiles.

•

Long-term control of hyperprolactinemia can be attained by first-line surgery and medical therapy.

•

Normalization of PRL improves patients’ BMI and fasting glucose levels.

•

Marginal changes in patients’ metabolic profiles are noted regardless of the primary therapy.

•

Not dopamine agonists per se, but rather the control of hyperprolactinemia plays a role in metabolic profile alterations.

Objectives

High prolactin levels have been associated with weight gain and impaired metabolic profiles. While treatment with dopamine agonists (DAs) has been shown to improve these parameters, there is a lack of surgical series on its comparative effect in prolactinoma patients.

Methods

In this retrospective, comparative study, consecutive patients with a prolactinoma were enrolled if treated with first-line transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) or with DAs. Patients with prolactinomas of Knosp grade >2 and those with a follow-up <24 months were excluded, as were patients with missing laboratory metabolic parameters at baseline and over the long-term. Effects of either treatment on BMI and the metabolic profile were analyzed, and independent risk factors for long-term obesity were calculated.

Results

Primary treatment was TSS for 12 patients (40%) and DAs for 18 patients (60%). At diagnosis, no significant differences between the two cohorts were observed with regard to adenoma size, Knosp grading, baseline prolactin (PRL) levels, prevalence of hypogonadism, or laboratory metabolic parameters. Mean follow-up was 51.9 months (range, 24–158). Over the long-term, both TSS and DAs led to the control of hyperprolactinemia (92% vs. 72%) and hypogonadism (78% vs. 83%) in the majority of patients. While a significant decrease in patients’ BMI and fasting glucose were observed, changes in the lipid profile were marginal and independent of the treatment modality. At baseline, increased BMI—but not the primary treatment strategy—was an independent predictor of long-term obesity.

Conclusions

Over the long-term, patients’ BMI and FG improve, but changes in the metabolic profile are marginal and independent of the primary treatment. It is presumable that not DAs per se, but rather the control of hyperprolactinemia plays a role in patients’ metabolic profile alterations.

Persistent bone impairment despite long-term control of hyperprolactinemia and hypogonadism in men and women with prolactinomas

While prolactinoma patients have high bone turnover, current data are inconclusive when it comes to determining whether correction of hyperprolactinemia and associated hypogandism improves osteodensitometric data in men and women over the long term. In a large cohort of including 40 men and 60 women, we studied the long-term impact of prolactinoma treatment on bone mineral density (BMD) in men versus women, assessed adverse effects of a primary surgical or medical approach, and evaluated data for risk factors for impaired BMD at last follow-up using multivariate regression analyses. Median duration of follow-up was 79 months (range 13–408 months). Our data indicate that the prevalence of impaired BMD remained significantly higher in men (37%) than in women (7%, p < 0.001), despite the fact that hyperprolactinemia and hypogonadism are under control in the majority of men. We found that persistent hyperprolactinemia and male sex were independent risk factors for long-term bone impairment. Currently, osteoporosis prevention and treatment focus primarily on women, yet special attention to bone loss in men with prolactinomas is advised. Bone impairment as “end organ” reflects the full range of the disease and could become a surrogate marker for the severity of long-lasting hyperprolactinemia and associated hypogonadism.