Is explantation of silicone breast implants useful in patients with complaints?

Multicentric reticulohistiocytosis with oral and laryngeal involvement in association with autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants: Expanding the spectrum of two uncommon entities

Multicentric reticulohistiocytosis (MRH) is the most frequent entity in the group of reticulohistiocytoses. It is usually accompanied by symmetrical erosive polyarthritis and is frequently associated with cancer and autoimmune disorders. Autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA) is an inflammatory syndrome triggered by adjuvants such as those contained in vaccines or by silicone implants. Here, we report the case of a 71-year-old woman with a history of breast cancer treated with surgery and subsequent prosthesis who developed a systemic hyperinflammatory syndrome including seronegative symmetric polyarthritis, multiple skin lesions, and two large nodular lesions in the oral cavity and larynx. The clinical picture was consistent with a clinical diagnosis of ASIA, with breast implant rupture and/or vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) as possible triggers. Histopathology of skin, oral nodules, and laryngeal nodules revealed cutaneous/mucous and submucosal infiltration of large epithelioid mononuclear or binucleated cells with fine granular ground glass-like cytoplasm and round to kidney-shaped nuclei with prominent nucleoli, without atypical features or relevant pleomorphism, accompanied by sparse giant cells and lymphocytes. These cells stained positive for CD68 and CD45 and negative for S100, CD1a, and markers of epithelial or neural/melanocytic differentiation, altogether consistent with a diagnosis of reticulohistiocytosis. Clinicopathological correlation allowed the final diagnosis of MRH. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a co-occurrence of MRH with ASIA, and this is relevant to broaden the spectrum of both these rare diseases.

Health symptoms and cosmetic silicone breast implants: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

There has been a growing concern about a possible causal relationship between silicone breast implants (SBIs) and health symptoms, referred to as breast implant illness. This study assessed the association between SBIs for cosmetic augmentation and health symptoms.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used the data from the Dutch Breast Implant Registry and Nivel Primary Care Database. A total of 688 women with cosmetic SBIs were age-matched with 1301 women without SBIs. The occurrence of 13 health symptoms presented in general practice was assessed 1 year before implantation until 3 years after implantation. Comparisons were made regarding the number of symptoms and general practice consultations, before and after implantation and between the two groups.

RESULTS

Women with SBIs were more likely to experience three or more distinct health symptoms and a combination of multiple symptoms with multiple consultations during follow-up than women without SBIs (adjusted OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.96; adjusted OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.00, respectively). Women with SBIs also had more than twice the likelihood of manifesting these outcomes in the second year after implantation compared to the first year before implantation (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.27 to 3.57; OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.22 to 3.72, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Women with cosmetic SBIs had increased odds of developing health symptoms after implantation compared to those before implantation and to women without SBIs. These results suggest an association between health symptoms and cosmetic SBIs that needs further research to explore whether there is causality or residual confounding.

The Problem of Diagnostic Criteria of Breast Implant Illness in Women After Breast Reconstruction: Review and Discussion of a Case

INTRODUCTION

There has been a rising trend in the use of silicone breast implants for breast reconstructions after breast cancer treatment, as well as in the aesthetic breast procedures. A cluster of non-specific symptoms related to the presence of silicone implant has been called breast implant illness (BII). However, there are no strict criteria of BII which would specifically define this term. The increasing interest in BII among patients and physicians urges verifying own cases of "on-demand" explantations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this paper, we discussed a case of a patient with initial BII diagnosis, after breast reconstruction, and reviewed the literature on the BII symptoms and aetiology. A decision for aesthetic revision, not explantation, was made as the diagnosis of BII was questioned, and somatisation due to dissatisfaction with the aesthetic result of breast reconstruction was diagnosed.

RESULTS

Improving aesthetics by implant exchange and contralateral mastopexy caused a full recovery from patient's symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Based on our case, we point on the fact that BII diagnosis in patients after breast reconstruction is challenging. We suggest that while considering such a diagnosis and further proceedings, e.g. explantation, especially in patients after breast reconstruction, some exclusion criteria should be considered. Dissatisfaction with the result of the surgery can also lead to somatisation and the presence of real clinical symptoms, which should not be confused with the possible autoimmune reaction to silicone particles.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Decreased Use of Anti-Inflammatory Medications in Autoimmune Connective Tissue Disease Patients Following Breast Implant Removal: A National Analysis

Background

Recent case studies demonstrate resolution of rheumatologic symptoms following implant explantation, raising concern around breast implant illness and associated inflammatory symptomatology. In patients with connective tissue disorders (CTD) and breast implants, we quantified the number of anti-inflammatory medications as a proxy for inflammation and disease burden before and after implant removal.

Methods

Using the Clinformatics Data Mart Database, adult female patients from 2003 to 2021 were queried. Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify patients who underwent implant-based reconstruction and subsequent implant removal. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth (ICD-9) and Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes identified patients with CTD. Filled prescriptions of anti-inflammatory drugs were quantified for each patient during the preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative windows surrounding breast implant removal.

Results

Of 1015 patients meeting criteria (mean age 56 ± 12 years), 821 (81%) filled prescriptions during the preoperative window, 753 (74%) filled during the perioperative window, and 735 (73%) filled during the postoperative window. Patients filled significantly fewer postoperative prescriptions than preoperative prescriptions (P < .001).Statistically significant predictors of the number of anti-inflammatory prescriptions filled in the postoperative window included additional anti-inflammatory prescriptions filled in the preoperative (P < .001) and perioperative (P < .001) windows. Experiencing a complication was not associated with the number of prescriptions filled in the postoperative window (P = .935).

Conclusions

We found a significant decrease in filled anti-inflammatory prescriptions in patients with known CTD following implant removal, suggesting that breast implant removal may help diminish inflammatory symptomology in predisposed patients.

A Prospective Observational Clinical Cohort of Women with Suspected Breast Implant Illness

Background: This study aims to describe a prospective clinical cohort of patients with silicone breast implants and suspected Breast Implant Illness (BII). Methods: Women were included in a specialized silicone outpatient clinic at Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands. Baseline characteristics were collected including medical history, implant details, and symptoms. Experienced physicians categorized BII suspicion as high, moderate, or low, based on symptoms and after exclusion of other probable causes. Additionally, participants completed questionnaires assessing symptoms and daily life impact at baseline, 6 months, 1, 2, and 5 years. For this initial analysis, the results from the first three years of inclusions were collected. Results: Data from 353 women were collected from December 2020-December 2023. At baseline, the most reported symptoms were fatigue, arthralgia, myalgia, and morning stiffness, accompanied by local symptoms in 83.3% of patients. At the clinic, 112 women were categorized as having high suspicion of BII, 147 women as moderate, and 94 women as low. At follow-up, 182 women (51.6%) opted for explantation. Following explantation, women with a high or moderate suspicion of BII experienced more significant symptom improvement, accompanied by a decrease in anxiety and a greater sense of control over their illness, compared to women with a low suspicion of BII. Conclusions: Our study highlights a distinct interplay of systemic and local symptoms among women with suspicion of BII. Women with a high or moderate BII suspicion benefit significantly more from explantation than women with low suspicion. Experienced physicians are pivotal in effectively assessing and guiding this patient group, highlighting the need for tailored clinical approaches.

The Spectrum of Non-neoplastic Changes Associated With Breast Implants: Histopathology, Imaging, and Clinical Significance

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma has been recognized as a distinct entity in the World Health Organization classification of hematolymphoid neoplasms. These neoplasms are causally related to textured implants that were used worldwide until recently. Consequently, there is an increased demand for processing periprosthetic capsules, adding new challenges for surgeons, clinicians, and pathologists. In the literature, the focus has been on breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma; however, benign complications related to the placement of breast implants occur in up to 20% to 30% of patients. Imaging studies are helpful in assessing patients with breast implants for evidence of implant rupture, changes in tissues surrounding the implants, or regional lymphadenopathy related to breast implants, but pathologic examination is often required. In this review, we couple our experience with a review of the literature to describe a range of benign lesions associated with breast implants that can be associated with different clinical presentations or pathogenesis and that may require different diagnostic approaches. We illustrate the spectrum of the most common of these benign disorders, highlighting their clinical, imaging, gross, and microscopic features. Finally, we propose a systematic approach for the diagnosis and handling of breast implant specimens in general.

Silicone Particles in Capsules Around Breast Implants: An Investigation Into Currently Available Implants in North America

BACKGROUND

Breast implants have always been composed of a silicone elastomer envelope filled with either silicone gel or saline. Breast implant illness (BII) is a set of symptoms that has previously been linked to the leakage of silicone particles from the implants into the body.

OBJECTIVES

Our research aimed to quantify the number of silicone particles present in the capsules of breast implants available in North America.

METHODS

Thirty-five periprosthetic capsules were sampled and analyzed, and silicone particles were counted and measured. The capsule surface area was then measured and utilized to calculate particle density and total number of silicone particles.

RESULTS

Eighty-five percent of capsules analyzed from silicone gel implants contained silicone, with an average of 62 particles per mm3 of capsular tissue. These implants had approximately 1 million silicone particles per capsule. In contrast, none of the saline implant capsules contained silicone. Capsules from macrotextured tissue expanders contained fewer and larger silicone particles.

CONCLUSIONS

Silicone gel implants presented silicone particle bleeding into the periprosthetic capsule, totaling on average 1 million silicone particles per capsule. On the other hand, no silicone particle bleeding was observed from saline breast implants. These data suggest that particle bleeding comes from the inner silicone gel, and not from the smooth outer silicone shell. Previous studies have reported the presence of breast implant illness in patients with both silicone- and saline-filled implants. Therefore, our data suggest that silicone migration is not the sole cause of BII.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Breast Implant Illness Through a Psychiatric Lens

Since their introduction in the 1960's, the safety of silicone breast implants has remained contentious due to concerns regarding carcinogenicity as well as a growing array of adverse psychiatric symptoms, which have now been termed 'Breast Implant Illness.' This article aims to explore the merits of a psychiatric approach to treating Breast Implant Illness by outlining how it is defined by psychiatric symptoms and categorized alongside other psychiatric illnesses. Furthermore, it is unclear whether the pathology of Breast Implant Illness is purely medical or psychiatric. However, the efficacy of the medical approach to treatment through a process called explantation, which involves removal of the implant and surrounding scar tissue, or capsule, is not strongly supported by existing data. A psychiatric approach to treatment, in conjunction with explanation, thus holds potential in remedying the novel and poorly understood Breast Implant Illness.Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Palpitation in women with silicone breast implants: association with autoantibodies against autonomic nervous system

We explored a possible association between palpitation manifestation in women with silicone breast implants (SBIs) with circulating level of autoantibodies directed against autonomic nervous system (ANS) receptors. The study was conducted in 93 women with SBIs who arrived to our clinic with diverse symptoms thought to be associated with their implants. Titers of 11 various autoantibodies were measured in the sera of women with SBIs who experienced palpitations (Palpitations, n = 47), did not experience palpitations (Non, n = 46), and healthy women (Control, n = 36). A significant reduction in anti-α2-adrenergic receptor (A2AR, P = 0.035), anti-β2-adrenergic receptor (B2AR, P = 0.027), antimuscarinic receptors M1R (P = 0.048), and anti-M2R (P = 0.039) autoantibodies was found in the 'Palpitations' group as compared with the 'Non' group. Anti-B2AR (P = 0.042), anti-M1R (P = 0.017), and anti-M2R (P = 0.0015) autoantibodies were also significantly reduced in 'Palpitations' as compared with the 'Control' group. Our study shows possible association between autoantibodies directed against ANS receptors, with existing complaints of palpitations in women with SBIs.

Saline Breast Implant Associated With Inflammatory Arthritis and Positive Antinuclear Antibodies (ANA): A Case Report

Breast implants, whether silicone or saline-filled, have a silicone shell and have been used for decades. Studies have shown an association between silicon with systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, progressive systemic sclerosis, and vasculitis. However, controversy and inconsistency have been pervasive in the literature with respect to the role of breast implants in the development of autoimmune diseases. A 39-year-old female with a past medical history of breast cancer and a family history of Sjogren's syndrome was referred to rheumatology for positive antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and polyarthralgia. She received textured saline breast implants for post-mastectomy reconstruction and subsequently developed fatigue, bilateral joint pain in her hands, wrists, and feet, and swelling in her fingers with prolonged morning stiffness, unintentional weight loss, and dry eyes. Physical examination revealed mild swelling of the bilateral metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP,) and distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints, and difficulty making a fist. Laboratory workup revealed a normal complete blood count (CBC) and comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) with slight elevations in inflammatory markers. Autoimmune workup revealed positive ANA 1:640 (nucleolar) and 1:160 (speckled), positive U1RNP, and RNA polymerase III with negative SSA/SSB/dsDNA and Scl-70 Ab. Following elective implant removal after nationwide recall for heightened cancer risk, many of her symptoms spontaneously resolved. The clinical case of inflammatory arthritis with positive ANA antibodies following saline breast implants highlights the importance of considering the possible health implications of silicone from a rheumatologic perspective. This case demonstrates that it may be reasonable that an association exists, and further research on a large scale would be valuable.

Breast implant illness: Is it causally related to breast implants?

Once believed to be completely inert implants, Silicon Breast Implants (SBIs) have been shown to be able to induce a chronic inflammatory response in the body which can lead to a variety of possible manifestations ranging from the most common capsular contraction to rarer conditions such as malignancies and autoimmune diseases. Among the latter, new syndromes have been consistently recognized: Breast Implant Illness (BII) and autoimmunity/autoinflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA syndrome/Shoenfeld's Syndrome). The pathophysiological mechanisms underlying such syndromes are not yet clear and the overlap they show with other common conditions have sparked an important debate in the scientific community regarding their existence and their cause-effect relationship with SBIs. In this article Professor Cohen Tervaert and Professor Bassetto, leading experts in the field, are going to present arguments in favor and against such causal relationship according to the latest scientific evidence. Professor Cohen Tervaert is going to demonstrate how the evidence available is enough to prove a causal relationship as defined by the Bradford Hill's criteria. Professor Bassetto is going to highlight how the many biases that afflict the available evidence prevent us from drawing such conclusions. Professor Shoenfeld is going to moderate the discussion with its insightful conclusions.

Biofilm-derived oxylipin 10-HOME-mediated immune response in women with breast implants

This study investigates a mechanistic link of bacterial biofilm-mediated host-pathogen interaction leading to immunological complications associated with breast implant illness (BII). Over 10 million women worldwide have breast implants. In recent years, women have described a constellation of immunological symptoms believed to be related to their breast implants. We report that periprosthetic breast tissue of participants with symptoms associated with BII had increased abundance of biofilm and biofilm-derived oxylipin 10-HOME compared with participants with implants who are without symptoms (non-BII) and participants without implants. S. epidermidis biofilm was observed to be higher in the BII group compared with the non-BII group and the normal tissue group. Oxylipin 10-HOME was found to be immunogenically capable of polarizing naive CD4+ T cells with a resulting Th1 subtype in vitro and in vivo. Consistently, an abundance of CD4+Th1 subtype was observed in the periprosthetic breast tissue and blood of people in the BII group. Mice injected with 10-HOME also had increased Th1 subtype in their blood, akin to patients with BII, and demonstrated fatigue-like symptoms. The identification of an oxylipin-mediated mechanism of immune activation induced by local bacterial biofilm provides insight into the possible pathogenesis of the implant-associated immune symptoms of BII.

Pulmonary adverse events of breast silicone implants and silicone injection

The incidence of breast implants and silicone injections has continuously increased since their FDA approval for use in the 1960's. The prevalence of overall adverse events is approximately 20%. The actual incidence of pulmonary adverse events is unknown. This review focuses on the pulmonary adverse events of breast implants and silicone injections. Vascular complications are represented by acute and chronic embolisation syndromes with a clinico-radiological presentation of alveolar hemorrhage. Inflammatory complications are numerous, including siliconoma, which is a granulomatous reaction mimicking a mesothelioma. On the other hand, there are some reports arguing a link between the development of auto-immune diseases and breast implants, such as scleroderma, rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren's syndrome, and dermatomyositis. Finally, for patients with asthma, breast implants may contribute to poor disease control. Cases of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangeitis have been described. Thus, it is of interest to decipherate mechanisms and incidence of these effects in prospective studies to better manage pulmonary diseases in patients wearing breast implants in order to understand their role as culprits or bystanders. In addition, characterization of subpopulations with increased risk of adverse events is needed as we highlighted that some subpopulations seem to be at greater risk of developing them, notably asthmatics.

Separating Myth from Reality in Breast Implants: An Overview of 30 Years of Experience

SUMMARY

The purpose of this article is to review the pivotal events in the history of breast implants in the United States, including the events leading to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration moratorium on the use of silicone gel implants and subsequent approval; the emergence of breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL); and persistent concerns about an association between breast implants, autoimmune disease, and systemic symptoms. This article reviews the medical literature to outline our current knowledge on BIA-ALCL; offers recommendations for diagnosis and management of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with textured implants; and reviews the science of potential associations of implants with autoimmune and systemic symptoms. The authors hope to help patients separate myths from reality and make educated decisions on having breast implants placed or removed.

Exploring Factors Associated with Implant Removal Satisfaction in Breast Implant Illness Patients: A PRO BREAST-Q Study

Background

Breast implant illness (BII) is a poorly understood heterogeneous disorder treated with implant removal; however, patient-reported symptoms and outcomes after treatment remain unclear.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients undergoing bilateral breast implant removal related to BII by two surgeons at an academic medical center between 2018 and 2022 was conducted. Patients were surveyed using the BREAST-Q Reconstruction model with the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery BII survey extension. Outcomes were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for patient-associated factors.

Results

Forty-seven patients were surveyed with a response rate of 51% (n = 24). Of the 20 patients who completed the survey, the majority were White (85%), with 45% (n = 9) having a documented history of psychiatric illness. Six (30%) patients had capsular contracture and four (20%) had documented implant rupture. Most implant removal procedures (n = 12, 60%) were not covered by insurance. Fourteen (70%) patients reported a net improvement in their symptoms after implant removal, most commonly chest discomfort, muscle pain, fever, and headaches. Capsular contracture was predictive of reduced psychosocial, sexual, and breast satisfaction scores (P = 0.015). Self-pay was predictive of increased breast satisfaction scores (P = 0.009), but had no impact on symptomatic improvement. A reduced time to implant removal was predictive of fewer residual symptoms (P = 0.032). Psychiatric illness had no significant impact on the outcomes.

Conclusions

In the setting of suspected or diagnosed BII, a reduced time to implant removal may decrease the risk of residual symptoms and improve overall patient satisfaction. In patients with capsular contracture, preoperative counseling should emphasize that implant removal may only improve physical symptoms.

A Case Report on Breast Implant Illness

In this case report, we discuss the case of a 64-year-old woman who presented with an unusual complaint of a chronic cough associated with pleuritic chest pain of 15 years following a saline-filled breast implant surgery. Initially, these were minimally abated by acid reflux medications. However, her cough worsened despite other interventions. In the work-up to determine the etiology of her complaints, the most common causes of a chronic cough were considered. The history ruled out post-nasal drip, and pulmonary function tests excluded asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), although she had a family history. An IgE allergy panel and an Aspergillus antibody test were also normal. However, an esophagram revealed a significant finding of mild to moderate Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Ultimately, the subsequent removal of the implants led to a dramatic resolution of her symptoms. It is worth noting that breast implants, like any other medical device, carry certain risks. Complications such as infections, implant rupture, capsular contracture, and changes in breast sensations are known risks associated with breast augmentation surgery.

Breast Explantation With Simultaneous Mastopexy and Volume Restoration: An Analysis of Clinical Outcomes and Prospective Quality of Life

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of patients are undergoing explantation to alleviate symptoms attributed to the presence of a prothesis or dissatisfaction with the appearance of their breasts.

OBJECTIVES

The authors aim to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and quality of life (QoL) of simultaneous explantation, capsulectomy, and mastopexy for patients requesting implant removal.

METHODS

Two hundred sixty-two simultaneous explantation, capsulectomy, and mastopexy (ECM) procedures were performed in 131 patients from 2009 to 2019. Prospective QoL assessment was administered for all patients. Inclusion criteria included a minimum postoperative follow-up of 6 months and completion of a practice-generated patient reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to compare changes in QoL scores.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up and BMI were 23 months (6 months to 8 years) and 24.8 kg/m2 (18-34 kg/m2), respectively. Mean age was 48.3 years (26-75 years). Autologous fat grafting was performed simultaneously in patients 47.3% (n = 62). The complication rate was 3.8% (n = 10 breasts) in 9 patients (6.9%). The overall reoperation rate was 7.3% of procedures (n = 19 breasts) and 9.2% of patients (n = 12), including secondary autologous fat grafting (11.3%, n = 7). PRO results demonstrated a significant improvement in all QoL domains, including physical well-being (P < .005), psychological well-being (P < .005), sexual well-being (P < .005), breast shape (P < .005), and breast appearance (P < .005). With respect to breast implant illness symptoms, 59 patients (88.1%) noted reduced pain, myalgias/arthralgias, and fatigue after ECM.

CONCLUSIONS

This study presents an effective paradigm to manage implant removal through simultaneous explantation, capsulectomy, and mastopexy with acceptable clinical outcomes and a significant improvement in QoL and breast aesthetics.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA) in 2023

In 2011, a syndrome entitled ASIA (Autoimmune/inflammatory Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants; Shoenfeld's syndrome) was first described. ASIA aimed to organize under a single umbrella, the existing evidence regarding certain environmental factors which possess immune stimulatory properties, in order to shed light on a common pathway of autoimmune pathogenesis. Such environmental immune stimulators, or adjuvants, include among others: aluminum salts as in vaccines, various medical implants, as well as various infectious agents. After the launch of the ASIA syndrome, the expansion and recognition of this syndrome by different researchers from different countries began. During the past decades, evidence had been accumulating that (auto)immune symptoms can be triggered by exposure to environmental immune stimulatory factors that act as an adjuvant in genetically susceptible individuals. A panoply of unexplained subjective and autonomic-related symptoms has been reported in patients with ASIA syndrome. The current review summarizes and updates accumulated knowledge from the past decades, describing new adjuvants- (e.g. polypropylene meshes) and vaccine- (e.g. HPV and COVID vaccines) induced ASIA. Furthermore, a direct association between inflammatory/autoimmune diseases with ASIA syndrome, will be discussed. Recent cases will strengthen some of the criteria depicted in ASIA syndrome such as clear improvement of symptoms by the removal of adjuvants (e.g. silicone breast implants) from the body of patients. Finally, we will introduce additional factors to be included in the criteria for ASIA syndrome such as: (1) dysregulated non-classical autoantibodies directed against G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) of the autonomic nervous system and (2)) small fiber neuropathy (SFN), both of which might explain, at least in part, the development of 'dysautonomia' reported in many ASIA patients.

Autoimmune autonomic nervous system imbalance and conditions: Chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, silicone breast implants, COVID and post-COVID syndrome, sick building syndrome, post-orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, autoimmune diseases and autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), fibromyalgia, silicone breast implants syndrome (SBIs), COVID and post-COVID syndrome (PCS), sick building syndrome (SBS), post-orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), autoimmune diseases and autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA) are frequently accompanied by clinical symptoms characteristic for dysautonomia: severe fatigue, dizziness, fogginess, memory loss, dry mouth and eyes, hearing dysfunction, tachycardia etc. The recent discovery of an imbalance of autoantibodies against G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) in some autoimmune diseases, post-COVID syndrome, SBIs allowed researchers to assume the novel mechanism in these conditions - autoimmune autonomic nervous system imbalance. In this review, all data published on an imbalance of autoantibodies against GPCR, clinical symptoms and pathogenic mechanisms in CFS, Fibromyalgia, SBIs, COVID and PCS, SBS, POTS, and some autoimmune diseases were analyzed. Possible criteria to diagnose the autoimmune autonomic nervous system imbalance were created.

The effect of explantation on systemic disease symptoms and quality of life in patients with breast implant illness: a prospective cohort study

Silicone breast implants (SBIs) have been subject to scientific scrutiny since the 1960's because of their potential link with systemic disease symptoms. Breast implant illness (BII) is a cluster of over 56 (systemic) symptoms attributed by patients to their SBIs. BII remains an unofficial medical diagnosis, although its symptoms include but are not limited to the clinical manifestations of autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA). The aim of this study was to prospectively analyse the effect of explantation on clinical manifestations of ASIA/BII symptoms, as well as to compare (breast-surgery specific) QoL in patients pre- and postoperatively while recording relevant perioperative/patient data. A prospective cohort study was conducted on 140 patients consulting a single surgeon for explantation of SBIs at a single clinic from 2019 to 2021 via their general practitioner, a medical specialist or self-referral. Of all patients, medical (implant) history, lifestyle factors and biometric data were obtained. Patients filled out a novel ASIA/BII symptom-survey termed the ASIA-scale, three domains of the SF-36 and the augmentation module of the BREAST-Q before and four months after the operation. A total of 109 patients completed both the pre- and postoperative survey with a mean follow-up duration of 205 days. There was a significant decrease in all individual symptom scores as well as ASIA-scale summary scores after explantation (p < .001). All SF-36 subdomains showed significant improvement postoperatively (p < .001). The BREAST-Q subdomain 'satisfaction with breasts' improved significantly after explantation (p = .036). No statistically significant association was found between any clinical parameters (such as age, capsulectomy, rupture etc.) and the recovery of symptom scores. This is the largest prospective cohort study on SBI explantation to date showing significant improvement of the most common systemic complaints in SBI patients as well as improvement of satisfaction with breasts and overall quality of life.

The effect of explantation on systemic disease symptoms and quality of life in patients with breast implant illness: a prospective cohort study

Silicone breast implants (SBIs) have been subject to scientific scrutiny since the 1960's because of their potential link with systemic disease symptoms. Breast implant illness (BII) is a cluster of over 56 (systemic) symptoms attributed by patients to their SBIs. BII remains an unofficial medical diagnosis, although its symptoms include but are not limited to the clinical manifestations of autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA). The aim of this study was to prospectively analyse the effect of explantation on clinical manifestations of ASIA/BII symptoms, as well as to compare (breast-surgery specific) QoL in patients pre- and postoperatively while recording relevant perioperative/patient data. A prospective cohort study was conducted on 140 patients consulting a single surgeon for explantation of SBIs at a single clinic from 2019 to 2021 via their general practitioner, a medical specialist or self-referral. Of all patients, medical (implant) history, lifestyle factors and biometric data were obtained. Patients filled out a novel ASIA/BII symptom-survey termed the ASIA-scale, three domains of the SF-36 and the augmentation module of the BREAST-Q before and four months after the operation. A total of 109 patients completed both the pre- and postoperative survey with a mean follow-up duration of 205 days. There was a significant decrease in all individual symptom scores as well as ASIA-scale summary scores after explantation (p < .001). All SF-36 subdomains showed significant improvement postoperatively (p < .001). The BREAST-Q subdomain 'satisfaction with breasts' improved significantly after explantation (p = .036). No statistically significant association was found between any clinical parameters (such as age, capsulectomy, rupture etc.) and the recovery of symptom scores. This is the largest prospective cohort study on SBI explantation to date showing significant improvement of the most common systemic complaints in SBI patients as well as improvement of satisfaction with breasts and overall quality of life.

WITHDRAWN: Autoimmune autonomic nervous system imbalance and conditions: Chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, silicone breast implants, COVID and post-COVID syndrome, sick building syndrome, post-orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, autoimmune diseases and autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants

The Publisher regrets that this article is an accidental duplication of an article that has already been published, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2022.103230. The duplicate article has therefore been withdrawn. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal.

[The Emerging Interest in Breast Implant Illness and its impact on Patient Behavior]

Breast implant illness (BII) is a loosely defined term for a collection of non-specific systemic symptoms that are hypothesised to be associated with breast implants. BII symptoms include fatigue, hair loss, rashes, chronic pain, and others. However, conclusive evidence for a causal relationship between silicone implants and BII remains lacking. In the light of recent findings that textured implants can, in rare cases, lead to breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL), a potential link between breast implants and BII is conceivable and justifies further investigation. We observe a growing number of patients seeking consultation and treatment for systemic symptoms related to breast implants, which is reflected in increasing interest in literature and social media. The aim of this work was to investigate the growing interest in BII. We now describe the clinical features of a patient who suffers from symptoms that are consistent with BII and contextualise clinical presentation in a review of literature and google trend analysis.

Regional Pain Blocks and Perioperative Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Breast Implant Removal With Capsulectomy

Background

Demand for breast implant removal is on the rise, with more than 36,000 explants performed in 2020, an increase of 7.5% from previous years. Postoperative (PO) analgesia is an important consideration in this patient group due to scar tissue surrounding the implant and the potential for extensive dissection during capsulectomy.

Objectives

The authors sought to compare perioperative pain control between three different types of ultrasound (US)-guided regional anesthetic techniques in patients undergoing implant removal with capsulectomy.

Methods

The authors reviewed all patients who received an US-guided block and underwent breast implant removal with capsulectomy at their outpatient surgical center over a 2-year period. They compared intraoperative (IO), PO opioid requirement, and patient-reported pain on the first postoperative day (POD1) between 3 different block techniques using chi-square analysis. A P-value of <.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 352 patients were included. Twenty-six patients (7.4%) underwent a serratus plane (SP) block, 13 (3.7%) underwent an erector spinae combined with pectointercostal fascial plane (ES + PIFP) block, and 313 (88.9%) underwent an erector spinae combined with pectoral nerve (ES + PECS1) block. ES + PECS1 was associated with less IO and PO opioid use compared with SP and ES + PIFP (1.9% vs 19.2% vs 61.5%, P < .001 for IO, 26.8% vs 34.6% vs 38.5% PO, P < .001). The ES + PECS1 block was associated with mild pain on POD1 compared with the other 2 regional block techniques (P = .001).

Conclusions

Regional pain blocks, and specifically the ES block, offer effective pain control for patients undergoing breast implant removal with capsulectomy, demonstrating high patient satisfaction in the PO period with low opioid requirements.

Level of Evidence 3

ASIA syndrome with severe lupus - A case report

The autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA), also known as Shoenfeld's syndrome, encompasses several autoimmune conditions/phenomena that are triggered following the exposure to materials with an adjuvant activity known to augment an antigen-driven immune response. In some inherently vulnerable patients, they act as second hits to trigger or unmask an autoimmune disorder which ranges from generalized non-specific constitutional symptoms, and autoantibody production, to a new onset, of a fully-fledged autoimmune syndrome. In this manuscript, we present a case of a 37-year-old lady who developed systemic lupus erythematosus characterized by mucocutaneous, musculoskeletal, hematological neurological, and renal involvement a few years after silicone breast implants.

Neuroimaging in Breast Implant Illness: An fMRI Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Some women with breast implants report systemic and cognitive symptoms known as breast implant illness (BII), which are very similar to those of fibromyalgia. Functional MRI (fMRI) has shown altered brain activity in fibromyalgia patients.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this pilot study was to investigate whether brain alterations could be observed in BII patients by fMRI.

METHODS

Women aged 18 to 76 with silicone breast implants for cosmetic reasons were recruited through a Dutch online BII support organization (MKS) and through the Maastricht University Medical Center. Study participants comprised 12 women with BII and 12 women without symptoms. Participants completed questionnaires regarding demographic characteristics, medical history, psychosocial complaints (Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire), cognitive failure (Mini-Mental State Examination), and pain intensity and pain-related disability (Chronic Pain Grade Scale). Subsequently, brain images of all participants were obtained by resting-state fMRI and diffusion tensor imaging in a 3-T MRI scanner (Siemens Medical System, Erlangen, Germany).

RESULTS

Eleven BII patients and 12 healthy controls were included in the analysis. Baseline characteristics were similar in the 2 groups and the mean silicone exposure was 15 years. Patients scored significantly higher than controls on both pain intensity and disability. Patients scored worse on depression, somatization, distress, and anxiety compared with asymptomatic women. Mini-Mental State Examination scores were normal. However, the analyses of both functional connectivity and structural integrity showed no significant differences between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study showed no evidence of brain alterations in BII patients. However, patients scored significantly worse on psychosocial symptoms than controls. Psychological factors appear to play an important role in BII and should be further investigated.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2

Autoimmune/autoinflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants: a focus on silicone

Autoimmune/autoinflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA) was first described in 2011 to cover disorders characterized by dysregulation of the immune system after exposure to an adjuvant. In the present review, the authors focus on silicone-induced ASIA. In the last two decades, there has been worldwide increase in the use of silicone breast implant (SBI) as an aesthetic procedure, raising concerns for possible effects on the immune system, especially in people who already have previous immune dysregulation. The authors did a critical review of the most important articles referring to silicone-induced ASIA, including most recent studies regarding physiopathologic mechanism. Despite large-scale epidemiological studies conducted to assess the association between SBI and autoimmune/rheumatic disorders, the results remain inconclusive, and the debate over the safety of SBIs remains heated. The explantation of silicone breast has been indicated for silicone-induced ASIA with improvement of unspecific symptoms in the majority of patients; however, the outcome seems different in patients with definitive autoimmune rheumatic disease (AIRD). There is no prospective study evaluating the risk of flares after SBI in patients who already have an AIRD. Therefore, based on the literature, we cannot contraindicate the procedure; however, we need to advertise about the risk of ASIA to the patients with AIRD. Long-term safety and implant-related outcomes should be discussed with these patients, considering each case individually, assessing genetic and environmental factors, and determining if the autoimmune disease is in remission or not, for shared decision among patient and the physician.

Patient-reported systemic symptoms in women with silicone breast implants: a descriptive cohort study

OBJECTIVE

An unknown portion of women with silicone breast implants (SBI) report development of systemic symptoms, recently named as 'breast implant illness (BII)'. We aim to describe the symptoms and characteristics of women with SBI reporting these systemic symptoms and compare the clinical course of women who chose to keep their implants, to women who had their implants removed.

DESIGN

Observational cohort study.

SETTING

Specialised BII out-patient clinic at Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands, from 2011 to 2020.

PARTICIPANTS

All women presenting to the BII clinic with SBI and systemic symptoms.

RESULTS

467 women were included for baseline analyses and 398 women for follow-up. Most frequently reported systemic symptoms at baseline included fatigue (88%), arthralgia (71%), morning stiffness (59%), myalgia (48%), cognitive impairment (33%), peripheral neurological symptoms (30%) and lymphadenopathy (22%). Furthermore, 56% reported pre-existing allergies at baseline and positive antinuclear antibodies were observed in 23%. At follow-up with a median of 3.3 years (IQR 2-4), 152 women had their implants removed on clinical grounds. Symptoms improved significantly in 65 women (43%), improved moderately in 37 women (24%), did not change in 37 women (24%) and deteriorated in 13 women (9%). Women who underwent explantation showed more improvement of their systemic symptoms compared with women who did not (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.3 to 6.2). Additionally, women who underwent explantation within 10 years after implantation improved significantly better than women who got the implants removed after 10 years (p=0.007). Lastly, local symptoms decreased from 75% to 34% after implant removal (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Most women with SBI who developed systemic symptoms experienced improvement after explantation, especially when removed within 10 years after implantation. Early recognition of the pattern of systemic symptoms in women with SBI is important and implant removal should be considered.

Cognitive Impairment, Sleep Disturbance, and Depression in Women with Silicone Breast Implants: Association with Autoantibodies against Autonomic Nervous System Receptors

Background: Silicone breast implants (SBIs) has been shown to be associated with an increased risk of autoimmune diseases. In the current study, we aimed to explore the potential association between circulating autoantibodies against the autonomic nervous system and cognitive impairment, memory deficit, and depressive symptoms reported by women with SBIs. Methods: ELISA assays were used to quantify anti-adrenergic receptors (α1, α2, β1, β2), anti-muscarinic receptors (M1-M5), anti-endothelin receptor type A, and anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor titers in the sera of 93 symptomatic female subjects with SBIs and 36 age-matched healthy female controls. Results: A significant difference was detected in the level of autoantibodies against the autonomic nervous system receptors in women with SBIs who reported memory impairment, cognitive impairment, and sleep disturbance as compared with both women with SBIs who did not complain of these symptoms or with healthy individuals without SBIs. Conclusions: Clinical symptoms such as depression, cognitive impairment, and sleep disturbances were found to be associated with dysregulation of the levels of circulating autoantibodies targeting the autonomous nervous system receptors in women with SBIs. These autoantibodies may have diagnostic significance in diseases associated with breast implants.

What 736 Plastic Surgeons Think about Explantation and Capsulectomy: A Global Opinion Poll

BACKGROUND

Breast implant illness, although not classified as a disease entity, has recently gained significant attention globally. The purpose of this study was to assess the status of explantation practices, discuss plastic surgeon's attitude toward requests for explantation and capsulectomy, and evaluate surgical management when accepting these challenges.

METHODS

Twenty closed-ended multiple choice questions were formulated to an opinion poll. The anonymous opinion poll was distributed to members of American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and presidents of plastic surgery societies on all continents.

RESULTS

A total of 736 plastic surgeons responded to the opinion poll. Although geographic variation was noted, a majority of 69.8 percent stated that explantation surgery had increased in their practice compared to the previous year. Requests for explantation without capsulectomy met with high acceptance rates among surgeons, regardless of whether patients were asymptomatic or not. Patients who also requested capsulectomy received less enthusiastic replies depending on the type of practice, years in practice, implant position, and type of capsulectomy (en bloc, total, or partial). When fat grafting was indicated, 68.7 percent stated that simultaneous lipofilling is limited when capsulectomy is performed, yet 44.5 percent stated that they would remove thin normal capsules in a symptomatic patient even when simultaneous fat grafting is requested by the patient.

CONCLUSION

The opinion poll supports the hypothesis that demand for explantation and capsulectomy increased globally among symptomatic and asymptomatic patients; that attitudes toward simultaneous capsulectomy are divided; and that management may differ according to geographic location, experience, and type of practice.

Breast Implant Illness: Surgical, Autoimmune, and Breast Reconstruction Associations

Breast implant illness refers to a combination of different symptoms related to breast implant surgery, including fatigue, brain fog, and arthralgias. This malaise occurs after cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgeries, although it has not been proven to be a disease. Even recent studies have reported concluding statements of the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment as unclear and widely unknown. Therefore, this review aimed to determine the associations between the manifestations of breast implant illness in surgery and breast reconstruction, as well as the autoimmune responses involved. Complications associated with breast implants include breast pain, capsular contracture, infections, as well as other manifestations specific to breast reconstruction. Moreover, patients with implants may present with new-onset systemic sclerosis, Sjögren’s syndrome, and connective tissue diseases. However, the incidence of capsular contracture has steadily decreased with each generation of implants, particularly since the development of textured implants, as well as with the use of antibiotics and antiseptic pocket irrigation. However, the incidence of anaplastic large cell lymphoma has increased with the use of textured implants. Remarkably, the autoimmune response to these implants remains unclear. Therefore, close follow-up, careful observation of any symptom presentation, and evidence-based treatment decisions are necessary for patients with breast implants.

Breast Implant-Associated Immunological Disorders

Background

Breast implants are commonly placed postbreast cancer reconstruction, cosmetic augmentation, and gender-affirming surgery. Breast implant illness (BII) is a systemic complication associated with breast implants. Patients with BII may experience autoimmune symptoms including fatigue, difficulty concentrating, hair loss, weight change, and depression. BII is poorly understood, and the etiology is unknown. The purpose of this literature review is to characterize BII autoimmune disorders and determine possible causes for its etiology.

Methods

The PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, Web of Science, and OVID databases were interrogated from 2010 to 2020 using a query strategy including search term combinations of "implants," "breast implant illness," "autoimmune," and "systemic illness."

Results

BII includes a spectrum of autoimmune symptoms such as fatigue, myalgias/arthralgias, dry eyes/mouth, and rash. A review of epidemiological studies in the past ten years exhibited evidence affirming an association between breast implants and autoimmune diseases. The most commonly recognized were Sjogren's syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, chronic fatigue syndrome, and Raynaud's syndrome. Explantation resulted in alleviation of symptoms in over 50% of patients, strengthening the hypothesis linking breast implants to BII. Studies have shown that silicone is a biologically inert material and unlikely to be the cause of these symptoms. This is supported by the fact that increased risk of autoimmune disease was also reported in patients with other implantable biomaterials such as orthopedic implants. Recent studies shed light on a possible role of bacterial biofilm and subsequent host-pathogen interactions as a confounding factor to this problem.

Conclusion

BII could be dependent on biofilm infection and the microenvironment around the implants. The true pathophysiology behind these complaints must be further investigated so that alternative treatment regimens other than explantation can be developed. Translational significance of these studies is not limited to breast implants but extends to other implants as well.

Breast Implant Illness: Treatment Using Total Capsulectomy and Implant Removal

BACKGROUND

Breast implant illness (BII) is extramammary systemic symptoms that are caused by breast implants. The emergence of this controversial topic has spurred patients with breast implants who are experiencing these symptoms to seek implant removal, hoping to feel better. This article presents novel outcomes and suggestions for plastic surgeons in managing BII using total capsulectomy and breast implant removal.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study conducted between 2016 and 2020, medical records of all patients undergoing breast implant removal were reviewed. Inclusion criteria consisted of all patients with history of breast implant placement presenting with mastodynia and capsular contracture on physical examination. Patients with history of implant-based reconstruction following mastectomy and patients who underwent implant exchange were excluded. All patients underwent bilateral implant removal and total capsulectomies.

RESULTS

A total of 200 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were identified. Average age was 45.5 (range: 29-73) years and average body mass index was 26.28 (range: 19-36.8), with an average follow-up time of 5 months postoperatively. Of patients with a presentation of BII, 96% reported improved or complete resolution of their systemic symptoms after implant removal and total capsulectomy. A positive microbial culture was found in 68.5% of patients, and all culture-positive patients reported improvement post-treatment. The most common organisms found were Propionibacterium acnes (49.6%). There were no associations between implant characteristics and rate of positive microbiology findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that implant removal with capsulectomy drastically improves BII symptoms. Further large prospective cohort studies are needed to better understand this entity.

A Practical Guide to Managing Patients With Systemic Symptoms and Breast Implants

Numerous studies have explored the possibility of an association between breast implants and systemic symptoms potentially linked to exposure to silicone. Some studies show no direct association whereas others provide insufficient scientific evidence to prove or disprove an association. Nonetheless, some patients with breast implants remain concerned about the possible role of their implants in systemic symptoms they may be experiencing. This paper provides a practical approach for plastic surgeons in managing patients with breast implants who present with systemic symptoms, including recommendations for patient counseling, clinical and laboratory assessment of symptoms, and/or referral. Integral components of patient counseling include listening attentively, providing unbiased information, and discussing the risks and benefits of options for evaluation and treatment. A thorough history and assessment of symptoms, including appropriate laboratory tests, may identify underlying conditions to expeditiously address patients’ health issues through a specialist referral. Diagnosing and treating disorders that are causing a patient’s symptoms, if unrelated to their implant, would avoid a potentially unnecessary surgery. Ultimately, better information is needed to reliably guide patients in an evidence-based fashion. Long-term follow-up of patients who are explanted to see what symptoms may or may not improve could be useful in educating patients. Control groups in studies prospectively following women with implants for development of systemic symptoms would also be useful because the symptoms reported are common in women without implants. Cases are presented to illustrate the recommendations for a practical approach toward management of women reporting systemic symptoms with breast implants.

Breast Implant Illness (BII): Real Syndrome or a Social Media Phenomenon? A Narrative Review of the Literature

Breast implant illness (BII) is a condition characterized by elusive diagnostic criteria and self-reported diverse disabling and distressing physical and psychological symptoms. With currently significant increase in public awareness, BII is perhaps becoming the most controversial subject in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery, generating heated debates between those who do not believe such a condition exists and those who demand its acceptance as a recognized diagnosis. Silicone incompatibility has been associated with "autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants" (ASIA syndrome) or Shoenfeld's syndrome. It is still unclear, however, whether BII symptoms would have occurred if no implants had been placed in the first place. The purpose of this literature review is to analyze critically the current state of scientific evidence related to this condition. Though the psychosomatic theory is most likely, the mechanism of BII symptoms is probably multifactorial. At present, BII being an underlying connective tissue disorder cannot be confirmed; moreover, whether improved aesthetic outcome and patient's overall satisfaction with the profile of their reconstructed or augmented breasts translate into decreased self-reported BII symptoms is still not well elucidated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Effects of Silicone Breast Implants on Human Cell Types In Vitro: A Closer Look on Host and Implant

BACKGROUND

Silicone (gel) breast implants (SBI) are used world-wide for breast augmentation, and reconstruction or to correct breast deformities. They consist of two compounds: an elastomer silicone shell (envelope) and a silicone gel filler (core). Breast Implant Illness (BII) is a term used for women with SBI, who suffer from various of symptoms including myalgia, arthralgia, fatigue, fever, dry eyes and/or dry mouth (sicca), as well as cognitive disturbances, which are rated by these woman as response to SBI. The pathogenesis of these adverse effects as well as the histocompatibility and the SBI-cell interaction of silicone and its surrounding tissue (implant-host tissue interface) is a subject of current research. The main purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the current knowledge regarding the effects of silicone (gel and elastomer surfaces) of a SBI on different human cell types from experimental - in vitro - models.

METHODS

A comprehensive research was conducted by two independent reviewers in March and July of 2020 in the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases.

RESULTS

A number of 1328 articles on this topic were initially identified, of which 62 could be finally included an analysed in this review.

CONCLUSION

SBI may lead to a physiologic pro-inflammatory and foreign body host response with fibrous encapsulation accompanied by a disturbed Th17/Treg balance and IL-17 production. No causal relationship is known for systemic symptoms and/or autoimmune outcomes in the context of BII.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Self-Reported Health Complaints in Women Undergoing Explantation of Breast Implants

Background

Concerns about the safety of silicone breast implants (SBIs) have existed for years, but a causal relation between systemic complaints and SBIs has not been proven. Nevertheless, some women are worried and even request explantation.

Objectives

This study aimed to review the explantation procedures performed, focusing on patient-reported symptoms preoperatively, the effect of explantation, and the effect of breast reconstruction on these symptoms.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed for patients who had undergone explantation between 2010 and 2020 at Maastricht University Medical Center. Patients who had undergone tissue expander removal, tissue expander–implant exchange, or direct implant exchange were excluded.

Results

More than half of the patients undergoing explantation reported complaints, mostly pain. Some 15% reported systemic complaints they believed were implant related. Breast implant illness (BII) was found to be the fifth most common indication for explantation (11.2%). A history of either allergies or implant rupture resulted in higher odds ratios of having BII (odd ratios, 2.1 and 2.1, respectively). Subjective improvement of BII after explantation was reported by about 60% of patients.

Conclusions

A relatively low prevalence of suggested BII exists among women undergoing explantation; 1 in 9 procedures were performed for this reason. Allergy and implant rupture may increase the likelihood of having BII. About 60% of BII patients experienced an improvement in their complaints after implant removal. Autologous breast reconstruction appears a good alternative. Prospective studies into health complaints and quality of life should be performed to confirm the effectiveness of explantation as a therapy for BII.

Level of Evidence: 4

Breast Implant Safety: an Overview of Current Regulations and Screening Guidelines

Breast implant surgery for cosmetic or reconstructive purposes is becoming increasingly common. While the devices used are regulated and approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, all patients with breast implants require continued follow-up. Many patients will seek this care from their primary care providers, especially when follow-up with their plastic surgeon is difficult. It is vital that treating clinicians are knowledgeable about the history of breast implants, routine screening guidelines, and the recent breast implant "hot topics"-breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL), connective tissue disease, and breast implant illness. This paper will provide the necessary information for primary care providers to appropriately counsel patients with breast implants to maintain not only their trust, but also their health.

Breast implant illness: scientific evidence of its existence

INTRODUCTION

More than one million breast augmentation procedures using silicone breast implants (SBI) have been performed worldwide. Adverse events of SBI include local complications such as pain, swelling, redness, infections, capsular contracture, implant rupture and gel-bleed. Furthermore, patients experience systemic symptoms such as chronic fatigue, arthralgias, myalgias, pyrexia, sicca, and cognitive dysfunction. These symptoms received different names such as autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA) due to silicone incompatibility syndrome and breast implant illness (BII). Because of chronic immune activation, BII/ASIA, allergies, autoimmune diseases, immune deficiencies and finally lymphomas may develop in SBI patients.

AREAS COVERED

Causality for SBI-related BII/ASIA is reviewed. To address the role of silicone implants in promoting causality, we utilized the Bradford-Hill criteria, with results highlighted in this article.

EXPERT OPINION

We conclude that there is a causal association between SBIs and BII/ASIA. Using data derived from patients with BII/ASIA and from other medically implanted devices, there appears to be clear pathogenic relationship between SBI and BII/ASIA. Breast implants cause characteristic systemic reactions in certain women, leading to symptoms of sufficient severity to warrant device removal. The morbidity suffered is variable. SBI removal resolves the symptoms in most women and removal is the most effective treatment.

Commentary on: Understanding Breast Implant Illness

BACKGROUND

Breast implant surgery is the most common plastic surgery procedure performed globally. A subset of women with breast implants report experiencing a myriad of disabling and distressing physical and psychological symptoms attributed to their implants. Social media groups have coined the condition "breast implant illness" (BII). Little to no scientific research currently exists for BII.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the experiences of women with BII (both those with implants still in place and those who have explanted) and compare them with those of a control group of women with implants who do not report BII.

METHODS

Women with self-reported BII and implants still in place (n = 51), self-reported BII who had explanted (n = 60), and women with implants in place without BII (n = 58) completed online self-report questionnaires about their symptoms, physical and mental health, health service use patterns, and lifestyle factors (eg, exercise, smoking, alcohol consumption).

RESULTS

Women with BII, regardless of whether they had undergone explant surgery, reported experiencing more severe somatic symptoms, higher depression, anxiety and health anxiety, and poorer physical health than women without BII.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings highlight the need for further investigation into the causes, risk factors, long-term effects, and potential interventions for women who experience BII.

ASIA (Shoenfeld's syndrome) due to hysteroscopic Essure sterilization

Essure (TM, Bayer; Leverkusen, Germany) may act as a potential cause of autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome by adjuvants (ASIA). Essure is a device hysteroscopically inserted into the fallopian tubes to elicit a local inflammatory response for permanent sterilization. Patients with ASIA present with a constellation of symptoms including fatigue, cognitive impairment, and arthralgias. It is well known that ASIA is triggered by implantation of foreign material such as breast implants and mesh for hernia repair. In the current study, we present a retrospective cohort of 33 patients electing to remove Essure due to pelvic pain and systemic symptoms consistent with an ASIA diagnosis, and detail a case report of an Essure patient. Furthermore, we reviewed the existing literature on adverse events associated with Essure and studies assessing outcomes following explantation. The concept that Essure may trigger ASIA is further supported by both in vivo and in vitro studies demonstrating immunostimulatory effects of the material components of the device. We conclude that the existing evidence is sufficient to recommend screening of Essure recipients for ASIA symptoms, and where indicated, discussion of the risks and potential benefits of surgical removal.

Implant Replacement or Removal: What Happens after Capsular Contracture? A German Study Examining Breast Implant Revision Surgery and Patient Choices in 946 Cases

Introduction

Capsular contracture most often leads to implant revision surgery for aesthetic or reconstructive purposes. However, little is known about which operation is chosen when revision surgery has to be performed. We performed analysis of revision indications and performed revision surgery considering implant removal or replacement and additional surgical procedures. To our knowledge, this study presents the largest German single-center analysis regarding implant revision surgery after the onset of complications.

Methods

Retrospective 10-year data analysis of a single-center population undergoing breast implant revision surgery.

Results

Capsular contracture was the most frequent finding before reoperation, both removal and replacement (p < 0.05). It was linked to longer duration of in situ implant placement (p < 0.05) and more frequently in reconstructive patients (p < 0.05). Implant replacement was performed more often before definite implant removal for reconstructive patients (p < 0.05). Mean duration of in situ implant placement before definite removal was lower for reconstructive patients (p = 0.005). Overall reconstructive patients were older than aesthetic patients (p < 0.05). After implant removal, 61.7% of aesthetic patients chose to undergo mastopexy, 54.7% of reconstructive patients opted for autologous breast reconstruction, and 25.4% did not choose an additional surgical procedure after implant removal.

Conclusion

Significant differences are observed for reconstructive and aesthetic patients regarding indication leading to revision surgery, time of revision surgery, and the type of performed revision surgery itself. After implant removal, more than 60% of aesthetic patients undergo mastopexy, more than half of reconstructive patients choose autologous breast reconstruction, and over a quarter of patients choose no additional surgical procedures.

Risk of rheumatic disease in breast implant users: a qualitative systematic review

Background

Recent studies on the risk of rheumatic disease among breast implant users have reported conflicting results. The primary objective of this study was to provide a systematic and critical review of the literature on the association between breast implants and the risk of rheumatic disease.

Methods

A qualitative systematic review was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, EBM-Reviews and CINAHL Complete from database inception to June 23rd, 2021. Eligible papers were full-length articles in English or French reporting original data on the incident risk of rheumatic disease among individuals with and without breast implants. Data were extracted from published reports and appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The main outcome was incident risk of systemic sclerosis (SSc), Sjögren's syndrome (SS), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), fibromyalgia and other rheumatic disorders and symptoms.

Results

Out of 3,425 identified citations, 86 met inclusion criteria. Two cohort studies suggested a two-fold increase in risk of SSc, whereas three case-control studies showed no increase in risk. Three cohort studies did not find an increased risk of incident and confirmed SS among breast implant users, however symptoms of sicca, myalgia and fatigue were reported more frequently. A meta-analysis of heterogenous studies reported a less than two-fold increase in risk of RA. Studies did not support an association with SLE. Insufficient evidence was available for autoimmune myositis and other rheumatic diseases. Implant rupture detected on imaging was not clearly associated with incident rheumatic disease, although no studies specifically examined the risk associated with acute/traumatic rupture. Little data was available on the safety of saline breast implants. Explantation often led to temporary improvement.

Conclusions

Based on a small number of high-quality and methodologically robust studies, an association between breast implants and a small increase in risk of SSc and RA could not be excluded. Symptoms of sicca, myalgia and fatigue were reported more frequently among breast implant users. Overall, there remains much uncertainty in regard to the association between breast implants and the risk of incident rheumatic diseases. Individuals considering the placement of breast implants should be informed of this uncertainty.

Trial Registration

This study was registered in the PROSPERO database (#CRD42019133616).

The ethics of explantation

BACKGROUND

With the increased use of implanted medical devices follows a large number of explantations. Implants are removed for a wide range of reasons, including manufacturing defects, recovery making the device unnecessary, battery depletion, availability of new and better models, and patients asking for a removal. Explantation gives rise to a wide range of ethical issues, but the discussion of these problems is scattered over many clinical disciplines.

METHODS

Information from multiple clinical disciplines was synthesized and analysed in order to provide a comprehensive approach to the ethical issues involved in the explantation of medical implants.

RESULTS

Discussions and recommendations are offered on pre-implantation information about a possible future explantation, risk-benefit assessments of explantation, elective explantations demanded by the patient, explantation of implants inserted for a clinical trial, patient registers, quality assurance, routines for investigating explanted implants, and demands on manufacturers to prioritize increased service time in battery-driven implants and to market fewer but more thoroughly tested models of implants.

CONCLUSION

Special emphasis is given to the issue of control or ownership over implants, which underlies many of the ethical problems concerning explantation. It is proposed that just like transplants, implants that fulfil functions normally carried out by biological organs should be counted as supplemented body parts. This means that the patient has a strong and inalienable right to the implant, but upon explantation it loses that status.

Outcomes of Implant Removal and Capsulectomy for Breast Implant Illness in 248 Patients

BACKGROUND

Breast implant illness (BII) is a term popularized by social media to describe systemic symptoms that patients ascribe to their breast implants. Though the concept of implants as an underlying cause for a systemic illness remains controversial, few studies have delineated the implant characteristics, capsular histology, and outcomes of patients who undergo explantation for BII.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the demographics, presenting symptoms, outcomes, capsular histology, and culture results of all women who presented to the senior author with symptoms attributed to BII and underwent breast implant removal with capsulectomy from August 2016 to February 2020. Chi-square and logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate association between implant type, composition, and findings of inflammation on capsule pathology.

RESULTS

Among 248 patients, 111 (23%) capsules demonstrated inflammatory changes on permanent pathology. Capsular inflammation was independently associated with silicone versus saline (right odds ratio [OR] = 2.18 [1.16-4.11], P = 0.016, left OR = 2.35 [1.08-5.12], P = 0.03) and textured versus smooth implants (right OR = 2.18 [1.16-4.11], P = 0.016, left OR = 2.25 [1.17-4.31], P = 0.01). Silicone material was present in the capsules of 12 patients (4.8%). Fourteen patients had positive cultures. There was one pneumothorax (0.4%), three hematomas requiring evacuation (1%), and two DVTs (0.8%). Of 228 patients, 206 (90.4%) reported high satisfaction with the outcome of the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of BII patients, we found that capsular inflammation is significantly associated with silicone and textured implants. Implant removal with capsulectomy can be safely performed in patients with BII with a low complication rate and high patient satisfaction.

Autoinflammatory/Autoimmunity Syndrome Induced By Adjuvants (ASIA) Due to Silicone Incompatibility Syndrome

The adjuvant-induced autoimmune syndrome (ASIA) is associated with a dysregulation of the innate and adaptive immune system after exposure to chemical compounds, including liquid paraffin, silicone gel, acrylamides, and hyaluronic acid. Due the increase of the use of these compounds in cosmetic procedures, the prevalence of this syndrome is increasing. We present the first report in Ecuador associated to ASIA after an elective silicone breast prosthesis procedure, manifested as polyarthralgia, positive antinuclear antibody, anticentromere antibody, and a moderate positive Sclero-70.