Utilization of Brain Tissue Oxygenation Monitoring and Association with Mortality Following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

Adverse Prehospital Events and Outcomes After Traumatic Brain Injury

Importance

While national guidelines recommend avoidance of hypoxia, hypotension, and hypocarbia in the prehospital care of traumatic brain injury (TBI), limited data validate the association of these adverse physiologic events with TBI outcomes.

Objective

To validate the associations of prehospital hypoxia, hypotension, and hypocarbia with TBI outcomes in a US national trauma network.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study examined data from 8 level I trauma centers and their affiliated ground and air emergency medical services (EMS) agencies in the Linking Investigations in Trauma and Emergency Services (LITES) Network from January 1, 2017, to June 30, 2021. Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with confirmed TBI (head Abbreviated Injury Score [AIS] of 1-6) and Injury Severity Score (ISS) of at least 9 were included. Interfacility transfers and patients who underwent prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation were excluded. Data were analyzed between April 20, 2022, and November 27, 2023.

Exposures

Adverse prehospital TBI events, including hypoxia, hypotension, or hypocarbia.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcomes were death in the emergency department (ED), hospital death, and unfavorable discharge disposition. Log-binomial regression models were used to estimate the association between adverse TBI events and outcomes, adjusting for sex, race and ethnicity, age, study site, transport mode, initial Glasgow Coma Scale, ISS, head AIS score, injury mechanism, and multiple trauma.

Results

The analytic cohort included 14 994 patients (median [IQR] age, 47 [31-64] years; 71% male; median [IQR] head AIS, 3 [2-4]). Patients with adverse TBI events included 12% (1577 of 13 604) with hypoxia, 10% (1426 of 14 842) with hypotension, and 61% (650 of 1068) with hypocarbia among those with advanced airway management. Patient outcomes included 2% (259 of 14 939) who died in the ED, 12% (1764 of 14 623) who died in the hospital, and 25% (3705 of 14 623) with an unfavorable discharge disposition. Hypoxia (adjusted relative risk [ARR], 2.24; 95% CI, 1.69-2.97), hypotension (ARR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.54-2.72), and hypocarbia (ARR, 7.99; 95% CI, 2.47-25.85) were associated with increased risks of ED death. Each adverse TBI event exposure was also associated with higher risks of hospital death and unfavorable discharge disposition.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this multicenter cohort study, prehospital hypoxia, hypotension, and hypocarbia were associated with poorer TBI outcomes. These results underscore the importance of optimal oxygenation, ventilation, and perfusion in prehospital TBI care.

Brain tissue oxygen pressure combined with intracranial pressure monitoring may improve clinical outcomes for patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Background

Although the optimization of brain oxygenation is thought to improve the prognosis, the effect of brain tissue oxygen pressure (PbtO2) for patients with severe traumatic brain injury (STBI) remains controversial. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine whether adding PbtO2 to intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring improves clinical outcomes for patients with STBI.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Library were searched for eligible trials from their respective inception through April 10th, 2024. We included clinical trials contrasting the combined monitoring of PbtO2 and ICP versus isolated ICP monitoring among patients with STBI. The primary outcome was favorable neurological outcome at 6 months, and secondary outcomes including the in-hospital mortality, long-term mortality, length of stay in intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital.

Results

A total of 16 studies (four randomized studies and 12 cohort studies) were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with isolated ICP monitoring, the combined monitoring was associated with a higher favorable neurological outcome rate at 6 months (RR 1.33, 95% CI [1.17-1.51], P < 0.0001, I2 = 0%), reduced long-term mortality (RR 0.72, 95% CI [0.59-0.87], P = 0.0008, I2 = 2%). No significant difference was identified in the in-hospital mortality (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.01, P = 0.06, I2 = 32%), length of stay in ICU (MD 2.10, 95% CI [-0.37-4.56], P = 0.10, I2 = 78%) and hospital (MD 1.07, 95% CI [-2.54-4.67], P = 0.56, I2 = 49%) between two groups. However, the pooled results of randomized studies did not show beneficial effect of combined monitoring in favorable neurological outcome and long-term mortality.

Conclusions

Currently, there is limited evidence to prove that the combined PbtO2 and ICP monitoring may contribute to improved neurological outcome and long-term mortality for patients with STBI. However, the benefit of combined monitoring should be further validated in more randomized studies.

Neurosurgical intervention in ultra-severe closed traumatic brain injury: Is it worth the effort?

Introduction

A subgroup of severe Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) patients, known as ultra-severe (us-TBI), is most commonly defined as a post-resuscitation Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 3-5. There is uncertainty on whether these critically injured patients can benefit from neurosurgical intervention.

Research question

The available evidence regarding the decision-making and outcome following management of us-TBI patients is critically reviewed.

Material and methods

Selected databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus and Cochrane Library) were searched from 1979 to May 2024 for publications on us-TBI patients, with a focus on treatment strategy, mortality and functional outcomes. Inclusion criteria were adult patients >18 years old with closed head trauma and admission post-resuscitation GCS 3-5. Studies were independently assessed for inclusion by two reviewers, and potential disagreements were solved by consensus.

Results

Where such data could be extracted, mortality rate was 27-100%, and favorable outcome was observed in 4-30% of us-TBI patients. While early aggressive neurosurgical management was associated with decreased mortality, a high proportion of patients survived with unfavorable functional status.

Discussion and conclusion

With supportive care only, outcome of patients with us-TBI is almost universally poor. Early and aggressive neurosurgical intervention in addition to best medical management can lead to favorable functional outcome in selected cases particularly in younger patients with an initial GCS>3 and traumatic mass lesions. There is insufficient data regarding the effectiveness of neurosurgical management on the outcome of us-TBI patients. and the decision to initiate treatment should be based on an individual basis.

Brain tissue oxygen combined with intracranial pressure monitoring versus isolated intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with traumatic brain injury: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Monitoring intracranial pressure (ICP) is pivotal in the management of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), but secondary brain injuries can arise despite normal ICP levels. Cerebral tissue oxygenation monitoring (PbtO2) may detect neuronal tissue infarction thresholds, enhancing neuroprotection. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of combined cerebral tissue oxygenation (PbtO2) and ICP compared to isolated ICP monitoring in patients with TBI. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Sciences databases were searched for trials published up to June 2023. A total of 16 studies comprising 37,820 patients were included. ICP monitoring was universal, with additional placement of PbtO2 in 2222 individuals (5.8%). The meta-analysis revealed a reduction in mortality (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.37-0.89, p = 0.01), a greater likelihood of favorable outcomes (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.66-3.14, p < 0.01), and a lower chance of poor outcomes (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34-0.79, p < 0.01) at 6 months for the PbtO2 plus ICP group. However, these patients experienced a longer length of hospital stay (MD 2.35, 95% CI 0.50-4.20, p = 0.01). No significant difference was found in hospital mortality rates (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.61-1.08, p = 0.16) or intensive care unit length of stay (MD 2.46, 95% CI - 0.11-5.04, p = 0.06). The integration of PbtO2 to ICP monitoring improved mortality outcomes and functional recovery at 6 months in patients with TBI. PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) CRD42022383937; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=383937.

Traumatic Brain Injury and Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the mechanisms of primary traumatic injury to the brain and spinal cord, with an emphasis on grading severity, identifying surgical indications, anticipating complications, and managing secondary injury.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Serum biomarkers have emerged for clinical decision making and prognosis after traumatic injury. Cortical spreading depolarization has been identified as a potentially modifiable mechanism of secondary injury after traumatic brain injury. Innovative methods to detect covert consciousness may inform prognosis and enrich future studies of coma recovery. The time-sensitive nature of spinal decompression is being elucidated.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

Proven management strategies for patients with severe neurotrauma in the intensive care unit include surgical decompression when appropriate, the optimization of perfusion, and the anticipation and treatment of complications. Despite validated models, predicting outcomes after traumatic brain injury remains challenging, requiring prognostic humility and a model of shared decision making with surrogate decision makers to establish care goals. Penetrating injuries, especially gunshot wounds, are often devastating and require public health and policy approaches that target prevention.

Brain tissue oxygen partial pressure monitoring and prognosis of patients with traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis

To assess whether monitoring brain tissue oxygen partial pressure (PbtO2) or employing intracranial pressure (ICP)/cerebral perfusion pressure (CCP)-guided management improves patient outcomes, including mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), mean daily ICP and mean daily CCP during the intensive care unit(ICU)stay. We searched the Web of Science, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE databases until December 12, 2023. Prospective randomized controlled and cohort studies were included. A meta-analysis was performed for the primary outcome measure, mortality, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Eleven studies with a total of 37,492 patients were included. The mortality in the group with PbtO2 was 29.0% (odds ratio: 0.73;95% confidence interval [CI]:0.56-0.96; P = 0.03; I = 55%), demonstrating a significant benefit. The overall hospital LOS was longer in the PbtO2 group than that in the ICP/CPP group (mean difference:2.03; 95% CI:1.03-3.02; P<0.0001; I = 39%). The mean daily ICP in the PbtO2 monitoring group was lower than that in the ICP/CPP group (mean difference:-1.93; 95% CI: -3.61 to -0.24; P = 0.03; I = 41%). Moreover, PbtO2 monitoring did not improve the mean daily CPP (mean difference:2.43; 95%CI: -1.39 to 6.25;P = 0.21; I = 56%).Compared with ICP/CPP monitoring, PbtO2 monitoring reduced the mortality and the mean daily ICP in patients with severe traumatic brain injury; however, no significant effect was noted on the mean daily CPP. In contrast, ICP/CPP monitoring alone was associated with a short hospital stay.

Procalcitonin/Albumin Ratio Predicts the Outcome After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

The procalcitonin/albumin ratio (PAR), a novel inflammation-based index, has been reported to predict the prognosis following cardiopulmonary bypass surgery and bacterial infection. However, whether PAR can predict the outcome of patients with severe traumatic brain injury (STBI) has not been fully elucidated. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between serum PAR levels and prognosis at 6 months after STBI.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 129 patients diagnosed with STBI and collected relevant clinical and laboratory data. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the association of PAR with the prognosis of STBI. The receiver operating characteristics curve was performed to examine the predictive use of PAR for prognosis. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was also performed to improve the reliability of the results. The primary outcome measures were expressed as a score on the modified Rankin Scale at 6 months.

RESULTS

The unfavorable prognosis group had advanced age, lower Glasgow Coma Scale score, higher rate of cerebral hernia and intracranial infection, higher neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR), elevated PAR, and higher rate of pneumonia. Multivariate analysis showed that PAR (before PSM: odds ratio 3.473, 95% confidence interval 2.983-4.043, P < 0.001; after PSM: odds ratio 5.358, 95% confidence interval 3.689-6.491, P < 0.001) was independently associated with unfavorable outcome. The area under the curve of the PAR for predicting an unfavorable outcome was higher than that of the CAR and NLR.

CONCLUSIONS

The PAR might be a novel independent risk factor of the outcome after STBI. Moreover, PAR was a better biomarker in predicting the outcome of patients with STBI than CAR and NLR.

Multimodal and autoregulation monitoring in the neurointensive care unit

Given the complexity of cerebral pathology in patients with acute brain injury, various neuromonitoring strategies have been developed to better appreciate physiologic relationships and potentially harmful derangements. There is ample evidence that bundling several neuromonitoring devices, termed "multimodal monitoring," is more beneficial compared to monitoring individual parameters as each may capture different and complementary aspects of cerebral physiology to provide a comprehensive picture that can help guide management. Furthermore, each modality has specific strengths and limitations that depend largely on spatiotemporal characteristics and complexity of the signal acquired. In this review we focus on the common clinical neuromonitoring techniques including intracranial pressure, brain tissue oxygenation, transcranial doppler and near-infrared spectroscopy with a focus on how each modality can also provide useful information about cerebral autoregulation capacity. Finally, we discuss the current evidence in using these modalities to support clinical decision making as well as potential insights into the future of advanced cerebral homeostatic assessments including neurovascular coupling.

Avoiding brain hypoxia in severe traumatic brain injury in settings with limited resources - A pathophysiological guide

Cerebral oxygenation represents the balance between oxygen delivery, consumption and utilization by the brain, and therefore reflects the adequacy of cerebral perfusion. Different factors can influence the amount of oxygen to the brain including arterial blood pressure, hemoglobin levels, systemic oxygenation, and transfer of oxygen from blood to the cerebral microcirculation. A mismatch between cerebral oxygen supply and demand results in cerebral hypoxia/ischemia, and is associated with secondary brain damage and worsened outcome after acute brain injury. Therefore, monitoring and prompt treatment of cerebral oxygenation compromise is warranted in both neuro and general intensive care unit populations. Several tools have been proposed for the assessment of cerebral oxygenation, including non-invasive/invasive or indirect/direct methods, including Jugular Venous Oxygen Saturation (SjO2), Partial Brain Tissue Oxygen Tension (PtiO2), Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), Transcranial Doppler, electroencephalography and Computed Tomography. In this manuscript, we aim to review the pathophysiology of cerebral oxygenation, describe monitoring technics, and generate recommendations for avoiding brain hypoxia in settings with low availability of resources for direct brain oxygen monitoring.

The Impact of Invasive Brain Oxygen Pressure Guided Therapy on the Outcome of Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major public health burden, causing death and disability worldwide. Intracranial hypertension and brain hypoxia are the main mechanisms of secondary brain injury. As such, management strategies guided by intracranial pressure (ICP) and brain oxygen (PbtO₂) monitoring could improve the prognosis of these patients. Our objective was to summarize the current evidence regarding the impact of PbtO₂-guided therapy on the outcome of patients with TBI. We performed a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane library databases, following the protocol registered in PROSPERO. Only studies comparing PbtO₂/ICP-guided therapy with ICP-guided therapy were selected. Primary outcome was neurological outcome at 3 and 6 months assessed by using the Glasgow Outcome Scale; secondary outcomes included hospital and long-term mortality, burden of intracranial hypertension, and brain tissue hypoxia. Out of 6254 retrieved studies, 15 studies (n = 37,245 patients, of who 2184 received PbtO₂-guided therapy) were included in the final analysis. When compared with ICP-guided therapy, the use of combined PbO₂/ICP-guided therapy was associated with a higher probability of favorable neurological outcome (odds ratio 2.21 [95% confidence interval 1.72-2.84]) and of hospital survival (odds ratio 1.15 [95% confidence interval 1.04-1.28]). The heterogeneity (I²) of the studies in each analysis was below 40%. However, the quality of evidence was overall low to moderate. In this meta-analysis, PbtO₂-guided therapy was associated with reduced mortality and more favorable neurological outcome in patients with TBI. The low-quality evidence underlines the need for the results from ongoing phase III randomized trials.

Initial neurocritical care of severe traumatic brain injury: New paradigms and old challenges

Background:

Early neurocritical care aims to ameliorate secondary traumatic brain injury (TBI) and improve neural salvage. Increased engagement of neurosurgeons in neurocritical care is warranted as daily briefings between the intensivist and the neurosurgeon are considered a quality indicator for TBI care. Hence, neurosurgeons should be aware of the latest evidence in the neurocritical care of severe TBI (sTBI).

Methods:

We conducted a narrative literature review of bibliographic databases (PubMed and Scopus) to examine recent research of sTBI.

Results:

This review has several take-away messages. The concept of critical neuroworsening and its possible causes is discussed. Static thresholds of intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure may not be optimal for all patients. The use of dynamic cerebrovascular reactivity indices such as the pressure reactivity index can facilitate individualized treatment decisions. The use of ICP monitoring to tailor treatment of intracranial hypertension (IHT) is not routinely feasible. Different guidelines have been formulated for different scenarios. Accordingly, we propose an integrated algorithm for ICP management in sTBI patients in different resource settings. Although hyperosmolar therapy and decompressive craniectomy are standard treatments for IHT, there is a lack high-quality evidence on how to use them. A discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of invasive ICP monitoring is included in the study. Addition of beta-blocker, anti-seizure, and anticoagulant medications to standardized management protocols (SMPs) should be considered with careful patient selection.

Conclusion:

Despite consolidated research efforts in the refinement of SMPs, there are still many unanswered questions and novel research opportunities for sTBI care.

Controversies and evidence gaps in the early management of severe traumatic brain injury: back to the ABCs

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) accounts for around 30% of all trauma-related deaths. Over the past 40 years, TBI has remained a major cause of mortality after trauma. The primary injury caused by the injurious mechanical force leads to irreversible damage to brain tissue. The potentially preventable secondary injury can be accentuated by addressing systemic insults. Early recognition and prompt intervention are integral to achieve better outcomes. Consequently, surgeons still need to be aware of the basic yet integral emergency management strategies for severe TBI (sTBI). In this narrative review, we outlined some of the controversies in the early care of sTBI that have not been settled by the publication of the Brain Trauma Foundation’s 4th edition guidelines in 2017. The topics covered included the following: mode of prehospital transport, maintaining airway patency while securing the cervical spine, achieving adequate ventilation, and optimizing circulatory physiology. We discuss fluid resuscitation and blood product transfusion as components of improving circulatory mechanics and oxygen delivery to injured brain tissue. An outline of evidence-based antiplatelet and anticoagulant reversal strategies is discussed in the review. In addition, the current evidence as well as the evidence gaps for using tranexamic acid in sTBI are briefly reviewed. A brief note on the controversial emergency surgical interventions for sTBI is included. Clinicians should be aware of the latest evidence for sTBI. Periods between different editions of guidelines can have an abundance of new literature that can influence patient care. The recent advances included in this review should be considered both for formulating future guidelines for the management of sTBI and for designing future clinical studies in domains with clinical equipoise.