Associated Factors of Survival Rate and Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Iran: a Systematic Review

Predictive factors associated with health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer in Iran: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to identify the primary factors influencing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), hypothesising that specific patient characteristics and clinical factors significantly impact HRQoL.

DESIGN

This was a cross-sectional study conducted over 1 month, from 1 April 2022 to 1 May 2022.

SETTING

The study was conducted in five hospitals in the northwest region of Iran, focusing on outpatient chemotherapy services.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 251 patients diagnosed with colon and rectal cancer participated in the study. Inclusion criteria included a confirmed diagnosis by an oncologist, ability to communicate, willingness to participate and being aware of their diagnosis and treatment. Exclusion criteria were the presence of other chronic diseases, cognitive disorders, known mental disorders and unwillingness to participate.

INTERVENTIONS

No interventions were applied as this was an observational study.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the HRQoL of patients with CRC, measured using a standardised SF-36 (36-Item Short Form Health Survey) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included the impact of demographic and clinical factors on HRQoL.

RESULTS

The total score of HRQoL in these patients is 47.22±16.78, which indicates that HRQoL is disturbed in these patients. Also, the results of the stepwise multiple regression revealed that among all the participants' characteristics considered, seven factors: not having another disease besides cancer (p<0.001, β: 12.91, 95% CI 8.40, 17.42), only receiving chemotherapy (p<0.001, β: 9.10, 95% CI 4.12, 14.09), not having colostomy (p<0.001, β: 10.27, 95% Cl 5.70, 14.84), female sex (p=0.046, β: -4.52, 95% Cl -8.95, -0.08), living in their own house (p=0.001, β: 11.25, 95% Cl 4.77, 17.73), living in city (p=0.002, 17.74, 95% Cl 6.51, 28.96) and finally not having a job (p=0.003, β: -7.47, 95% Cl -12.31, -2.63), including are the factors that have the most predictive power in HRQoL.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study encourage health service providers and planners to pay special attention to the characteristics of patients with CRC as identified in this study. Notably, several HRQoL scores in patients with CRC are low, and the study found that patient characteristics, such as the presence of colostomy, unemployment, female gender and comorbidities, significantly predict the overall HRQoL score. Future research should focus on interventional studies aimed at minimising the adverse effects of disease symptoms on HRQoL in these vulnerable patients.

Outcome of early versus late ileostomy closure in patients with rectal cancers undergoing low anterior resection: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Protective loop ileostomy is performed following low anterior resection (LAR) in patients with rectal cancer to reduce the complications of primary anastomosis. The optimal timing for ileostomy closure remains controversial. The aim of the current study was to compare the effects of early (<2 weeks) versus late (≥2 months) closure of the stoma in patients with rectal cancer undergoing LAR on surgical outcome and complications rates.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study was conducted in two referral centers in Shiraz, Iran, during a 2-year period. We have consecutively and prospectively included adult patients with rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent LAR followed by protective loop ileostomy in our center during the study period. The baseline, tumor characteristics and complication as well as outcome was recorded in a 1-year follow-up and was compared between early and late ileostomy closure.

RESULTS

Overall, 69 patients (32 in early and 37 in late group) were included. The mean age of the patients was 59.40 ± 9.30 years and there were 46 (66.7%) men and 23 (33.3%) women. Patients undergoing early closure of the ileostomy had significantly shorter operation duration (p<0.001) and lower intraoperative bleeding (p<0.001) compared to late ileostomy closure. There was no significant difference between two study groups regarding the complications. Early closure was also not found to be a predictive factor of post-ileostomy closure complications.

CONCLUSION

Early closure (<2 weeks) of ileostomy after LAR in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma is a safe and feasible technique which is associated with favorable outcome.

Colorectal Cancer Screening in the Middle East: What, Why, Who, When, and How?

The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in the Middle East is increasing, especially among those younger than 50 years. Risk factors including obesity, sedentary lifestyle, and dietary changes are associated with the epidemiologic shift and are a result of socioeconomic changes happening in the region. Worldwide, CRC screening is associated with decreased incidence and mortality of CRC, but screening uptake is still low in the Middle East because of cultural barriers and lack of awareness; in addition, most countries do not have national screening programs. Knowledge of CRC screening and participation rates vary among different countries, but overall they are low. Both primary and secondary prevention approaches are needed in the Middle East, and cost-effectiveness is important in choosing screening modalities. Although colonoscopy is considered the most robust screening method, stool-based testing may be an acceptable screening strategy in resource-limited settings, and focusing on high-risk individuals such as those with hereditary CRC might be the most cost-effective strategy. In addition to financial limitations in many countries in the Middle East, human displacement places an extra toll on cancer control strategies in the region.

Barriers and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in Asia

Purpose

One of the most common cancers in Asia is colorectal cancer (CRC). Early diagnosis and timely treatment are necessary for preventing complications and advanced stages of the disease. It is important to evaluate barriers and facilitators of screening in different countries. This systematic review aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators of CRC screening in Asia.

Methods

In this systematic review, for identifying barriers and facilitators of CRC screening, a comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus in 12 December 2020. Combination keywords such as colorectal cancer, screening, sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, faecal occult blood test, barriers, facilitators and the names of each Asian country were used for searching. Full text original studies in English language were accepted in the review.

Results

In total, 36 articles were included in the review. Barriers and facilitators were evaluated. The most common reported barriers were lack of knowledge, fear of result, fear of procedure, fear of pain, lack of awareness, high cost and lack of gastrointestinal symptoms. The most frequent facilitators were having knowledge and awareness of CRC screening, perceived risk and severity, family history of cancer and physician recommendation.

Conclusion

For promoting success in CRC screening programmes, knowing what the barriers and facilitators are is necessary. Awareness and various personal, professional and social factors have been shown to be the major barriers toward CRC screening in most Asian countries.

The Barriers and Facilitators of Gastric Cancer Screening: a Systematic Review

AIM

Gastric cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death and the fifth most common cancer worldwide. Screening is one of the most important ways to increase survival. The aim of this systematic review was to determinate barriers and facilitators for accessing gastric cancer screening.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this systematic review, for identifying barriers and facilitators of gastric cancer screening, a comprehensive search was conducted in electronic databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus in 2021. Combination keywords such as gastric cancer, screening, endoscopy, barriers, and facilitators were used for searching. Full text original studies in English language that are dealing with barriers and facilitators for accessing gastric cancer screening were included in this review.

RESULTS

A total 13 articles included in this review. Ten barriers and ten facilitators were evaluated. The most common reported barriers were lack of signs, fear of screening procedure, fear of screening outcome, cost of screening, and embarrassment. The most frequent facilitator was socio demographic factors such as age, education, and employment.

CONCLUSION

For promoting success in gastric cancer, screening programs, knowing barriers, and facilitators is  necessary. No signs and symptoms of disease have been shown as the major barriers toward gastric cancer screening in most studies.

Participation Rate, Risk Factors, and Incidence of Colorectal Cancer in the Screening Program Among the Population Covered by the Health Centers in Arak, Iran

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the most common and preventable cancers, the incidence and risk factors of which are different in various populations. Objectives: The present study aims at assessing incidence rate, risk factors, and symptoms of CRC among the populations aged 50 to 70 years old covered by the health centers in Arak, as well as evaluating participation rate in the CRC screening program. Methods: The present cross-sectional study was conducted from 2016 to 2019 among all of the individuals aged 50 to 70 years old, who were referred to rural, urban, and suburban health centers in Arak for CRC screening, and their data were recorded in the Sib system. The participation rate, risk factors (family and individual history of CRC, colorectal adenoma, and inflammatory bowel disease), symptoms (lower gastrointestinal bleeding, constipation with or without diarrhea, and weight loss), and crude incidence rate of CRC were calculated in the age range. Results: The mean (SD) age of the CRC was 59.72 (5.56) years. In addition, the individuals’ participation rate in the program was about 44.2%, which was more among women (55.5%) and villagers (93.7%). Most subjects complained of constipation in the last month and CRC family history. The CRC crude incidence rates were 35.93 (95% CI: 25.55 - 50.54), 40.96 (95% CI: 29.81 - 56.29), 43.76 (95% CI: 32.22 - 59.43), and 52.84 (95% CI: 40.05 - 69.71) per 100000 individuals during 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019, respectively. Conclusions: The participation rate in the CRC screening program was low, and the trend of the cancer crude incidence rate increased among the populations aged 50 to 70 years. Finally, informing about the recognition of the risk factors and symptoms of cancer, as well as the timely referral for screening was considered essential.

Developing a clinical decision support system based on the fuzzy logic and decision tree to predict colorectal cancer

Background: Colorectal Cancer (CRC) is the most prevalent digestive system- related cancer and has become one of the deadliest diseases worldwide. Given the poor prognosis of CRC, it is of great importance to make a more accurate prediction of this disease. Early CRC detection using computational technologies can significantly improve the overall survival possibility of patients. Hence this study was aimed to develop a fuzzy logic-based clinical decision support system (FL-based CDSS) for the detection of CRC patients. Methods: This study was conducted in 2020 using the data related to CRC and non-CRC patients, which included the 1162 cases in the Masoud internal clinic, Tehran, Iran. The chi-square method was used to determine the most important risk factors in predicting CRC. Furthermore, the C4.5 decision tree was used to extract the rules. Finally, the FL-based CDSS was designed in a MATLAB environment and its performance was evaluated by a confusion matrix. Results: Eleven features were selected as the most important factors. After fuzzification of the qualitative variables and evaluation of the decision support system (DSS) using the confusion matrix, the accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity of the system was yielded 0.96, 0.97, and 0.96, respectively. Conclusion: We concluded that developing the CDSS in this field can provide an earlier diagnosis of CRC, leading to a timely treatment, which could decrease the CRC mortality rate in the community.

Incidence and Risk Factors of Colorectal Cancer in the Iranian Population: a Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers in the world. The aim of this study was to investigate its incidence and risk factors in the Iranian population.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, SID, and Magiran from inception until 2019. Studies that reported the incidence rate and risk factors of colorectal cancer were included in this review.

RESULTS

Twenty-one articles that reported the incidence rate and 13 that reported the risk factors were included. The incidence rate was different according to the population type, gender, age, and study year in different regions. The main risk factors for colorectal cancer were high consumption of red meat and fried food and low intake of fruits and vegetables, diabetes, a positive family history, and obesity.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of CRC has a marked variation in different parts of Iran, and various risk factors are associated with colorectal cancer. According to incidence rate and various risk factors, precise planning is needed to control colorectal cancer in the future.

Marital status and survival of patients with colorectal signet ring cell carcinoma: a population-based study

The prognostic role of marital status on colorectal signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) has not been studied. In this study, the correlation of marital status with prognosis of colorectal SRCC was analyzed. Eligible subjects were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) dataset from 2004 to 2015, followed by comparison of cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) between married and unmarried group. 3152 patients were identified including 1777 married patients (56.38%). Married populations tended to be more patients aged < 65, male, receiving chemotherapy, and less black race and large tumor size compared to unmarried group (all P < 0.05).Moreover, 5-year CSS (30.04% vs. 28.19%, P = 0.0013) and OS rates (26.68% vs. 22.94%, P < 0.0001) were superior in married population. Multivariate analysis revealed that marital status was an independent favorable prognostic indicator, and married population had better CSS (HR: 0.898; 95% CI: 0.822–0.980; P = 0.016) and OS (HR: 0.898; 95%CI: 0.827–0.975; P = 0.011).In addition, CSS as well as OS were superior in married populations than unmarried ones in most subgroups. Marital status was an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with colorectal SRCC. Additionally, married patients obtained better survival advantages.

Evaluation of colonoscopy data for colorectal polyps and associated histopathological findings

Background

Adenomas of colon and rectal are frequent colonoscopically found benign lesions. The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence of polyps among patients referred for colonoscopy and associated histopathological findings.

Methods

In this retrospective study, patients referred for colonoscopy at Shahid Madani Hospital from were enrolled. The records of the patients were evaluated for demographic data, polyp status along with size and location and type and histopathological findings of the polyps. The data obtained were statistically analyzed using SPSSv22.

Results

Among 1600 patients who underwent colonoscopy, 260 were positive with polyps. The main symptom among these patients was lower gastrointestinal bleeding 44.2%. The average size of the polyps was 5.68 ± 2.66 and the incidence was significantly greatest among the age group of 51–65 years, p < 0.01. The commonest sites polyps were sigmoid and descending colon, 28.6% and 23.2%, respectively. Adenomatous polyps were the most frequent type, 58.3%. The morphology and pathology of the polyps were significantly associated with each other, p < 0.01.

Conclusion

Our study evaluates the retrospective data for polyp findings among colonoscopy patients. Early diagnosis of polyps can provide better therapeutic outcomes.

•

Adenomas of colon and rectal are frequent colonoscopically found benign lesions.

•

Surveillance of colonoscopy could have been compromised since several physicians were included in the study.