DNA repair gene variants in endometrial carcinoma

XRCC1 and hOGG1 polymorphisms and endometrial carcinoma: A meta-analysis

Endometrial carcinoma's (EC) etiology is complex and involves DNA repair gene polymorphisms like XRCC1-Arg399Gln and hOGG1-Ser326Cys, but their association with the disease is unclear. Following PRISMA, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, collecting data from four databases. The studies needed to be population-based case-control studies examining the association between the named polymorphisms and EC. Quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated, and subgroup analyses were conducted based on ethnicity. Seven studies were included. Both polymorphisms were found to significantly increase EC risk, particularly in Caucasians. XRCC1-Arg399Gln showed a dominant model OR of 1.14 (95% CI: 1.01-1.29) and a homozygous model OR of 1.59 (95% CI: 1.12-2.25). The heterozygote model OR for hOGG1-Ser326Cys was 1.29 (95% CI: 1.02-1.63), and the allele OR was 1.31 (95% CI: 1.07-1.60). XRCC1-Arg399Gln and hOGG1-Ser326Cys may increase EC risk, primarily in Caucasian women, emphasizing the role of DNA repair in disease susceptibility. More extensive studies are needed to validate these findings in diverse ethnicities and investigate other DNA repair gene polymorphisms.

A meta-analysis of XRCC1 single nucleotide polymorphism and susceptibility to gynecological malignancies

BACKGROUND

Gynecological malignant tumor is a serious threat to women's health, cervical cancer, endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer are the most common. The eponymous protein encoded by the XRCC1 (X-ray repair cross complementation 1) gene is an important functional protein in the process of single-stranded DNA damage. Non-synonymous mutations of XRCC1 gene cause amino acid sequence changes that affect protein function and DNA repair ability, and may affect the interaction with other DNA repair proteins, leading to increased risk of tumor development. Many studies have assessed the association between XRCC1 gene polymorphism and the risk of cancer in the female reproductive system, but the results have been inconclusive. In this study, the relationship between XRCC1 Arg399Gln, Arg194Trp, Arg280His single nucleotide polymorphisms and susceptibility to gynecological malignancies was further explored by meta-analysis.

METHODS

English database: Pubmed, Medline, Excerpta Medica Database, Cochrance, etc; Chinese database: China national knowledge infrastructure, Wanfang Database, etc. STATA14 was used for statistical analysis, such as odd ratio (OR) value, subgroup analysis, heterogeneity test, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias.

RESULTS

In gynecologic cancers, the allele frequency difference of Arg399Gln case control group was statistically significant (GvsA: P = .007). There was no significant difference in allele frequency in the Arg194Trp and Arg280His case control groups (P = .065, 0.198). In different gene models, Arg399Gln was significantly correlated with gynecologic cancers susceptibility (GGvs AA: OR 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85 0.98); Arg194Trp was significantly correlated with gynecologic cancers susceptibility (CCvs TT: OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.88,1.00; CCvs CT: OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.90, 1.05); Arg280His was significantly correlated with gynecologic cancers susceptibility (GGvs AA: OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.94, 1.02; GGvs GA: OR 1.00;95% CI 0.97, 1.04). In the subgroup analysis, Arg399Gln and Arg194Trp were significantly correlated with gynecologic cancers susceptibility in the Asian race (P = .000, 0.049). In the analysis of different cancer subgroups, Arg399Gln and cervical cancer susceptibility were statistically significant (P = .039). Arg194Trp and endometrial cancer susceptibility were statistically significant (P = .033, 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

XRCC1 Arg399Gln, Arg194Trp, Arg280His single nucleotide polymorphisms were associated with gynecologic cancer susceptibility. Arg399Gln genotype was statistically significant in relation to cervical cancer susceptibility. Arg194Trp genotype was statistically significant in relation to endometrial cancer susceptibility.

Association between XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism and risk of gynecological malignancies: A meta-analysis

Studies have investigated the relationship between the X-ray cross- complementing group 3 (XRCC3) Thr241Met polymorphism and the risk of gynecological malignancies (GM) with the contradictory conclusions. Here, a meta-analysis was performed to provide clear picture of the association between Thr241Met and GM risk. The Pubmed and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases were searched for published eligible studies. The pooled odds ratios (OR) with their corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to assessed the strength of association. Totally, 15 publications with 5,740 cases and 9,931 controls were included. In the overall analysis, the results of meta-analysis showed no significant association between the Thr241Met and the risk of GM. However, in the Asians subgroup, significant increased risks were found in the comparisons of TT/CT+TT vs. CC(TT vs. CC: OR=3.25, 95% CI=1.47-7.18; CT+TT vs. CC: OR=1.51, 95%CI=1.10-2.09) in Asians; additionally, stratified analysis by cancer type in Asians, significantly increased risks was found in cervical carcinoma (CT vs. CC: OR=1.50, 95%CI=1.04-2.14; TT vs. CC: OR=3.14, 95%CI=1.38-7.14; CT+TT vs. CC: OR=1.64, 95% CI=1.17-2.31). It suggests that the risk of GM might be significantly increased by the XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism according to ethnicity and cancer types. Further studies with larger sample size in different ethnic populations and different sites of GM are needed to verify the findings.

Association of the hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism with gynecologic cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis

The association between the hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and gynecologic cancer susceptibility is inconclusive. We performed a comprehensive meta-analysis to precisely estimate of the impact of the hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism on gynecologic cancer susceptibility. Electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, WanFang, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched for relevant studies. Odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined to assess the strength of the association. Fourteen studies with 2712 cases and 3638 controls were included in the final meta-analysis. The pooled analysis yielded a significant association between the hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and overall gynecologic cancer susceptibility (dominant model: OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.03–1.30, P=0.017). A significantly higher gynecologic cancer risk was found for the European population (homozygous model: OR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.80–2.61, P<0.001; recessive model: OR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.41–3.17, P<0.001; dominant model: OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.12–1.48, P<0.001; and allele model: OR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.13–1.74, P=0.002), but not in the Asian population. The stratified analysis by cancer type revealed endometrial cancer was significantly associated with the hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism (dominant model: OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.09–1.54, P=0.003; and allele model: OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.02–1.60, P=0.031). In conclusion, the hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism was associated with higher overall gynecologic cancer susceptibility, especially for endometrial cancer in the European population.

Meta-analysis of XRCC1 polymorphism and risk of female reproductive system cancer

Numerous epidemiological studies have evaluated the association between polymorphism in the gene encoding x-ray repair cross complementing 1 (XRCC1) protein and the risk of female reproductive system cancer, but results are inconclusive. To gain a comprehensive picture of available evidence, we searched for relevant studies in the PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases up to December 17, 2016. A total of 26 case-control studies were picked out. The pooled odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated to estimate the association. Based on data of all study participants, we did not find a positive association of rs25487 or rs1799782 polymorphism with risk of female reproductive cancer risk. Subgroup analysis, however, identified two alleles as being associated with an increased risk of female reproductive system cancer in Asians: the A allele of rs25487 (heterozygous genetic model, OR 1.16, 95%CI 1.00-1.36), and the T allele of rs1799782 (homozygous model, OR 2.30, 95%CI 1.39-3.82; dominant model, OR 1.28, 95%CI 1.10-1.50; recessive model, OR 2.11, 95%CI 1.33-3.34). Moreover, the AA genotype at rs25489 was determined to be a risk factor for cervical cancer etiology (homozygous model, OR 2.91, 95%CI, 1.17-7.26; recessive model, OR 3.16, 95%CI 1.91-5.24). This meta-analysis suggests that no association between rs25487 or rs1799782 gene polymorphism and risk of female reproductive cancer risk was found. These results should be validated in larger studies.

Association between the OGG1 Ser326Cys Polymorphism and Cancer Risk: Evidence from 152 Case-Control Studies

Although it has been suggested that the 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase (OGG1) gene Ser326Cys polymorphism may be a risk factor for cancer, the conclusions from previous studies are inconsistent. Thus, we conducted an updated meta-analysis to estimate the effect of OGG1 variant genotypes on cancer susceptibility. We searched the PubMed for all eligible studies published in English for the period ending September 2014. We found the association between OGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and cancer susceptibility based on 152 case-control studies in different genetic model comparisons (dominant model: OR = 1.053, P = 0.018; recessive model: OR = 1.108, P < 0.001; homozygote: OR = 1.135, P < 0.001; additive model: OR = 1.059, P < 0.001). However, the results from the subgroup analyses based on types of cancer, health population as controls or studies with relatively large sample size did not support the conclusion. Although the overall results of this meta-analysis showed a positive association between OGG1 variant genotypes and cancer susceptibility, the subgroup analyses by cancer type, sample size, and source of controls presented inconsistent results. Therefore, the current evidence from the meta-analysis did not support the hypothesis of OGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism as a risk factor of cancer.

Insulin is an important risk factor of endometrial cancer among premenopausal women: a case-control study in China

The aim of the article was to evaluate the important role played by insulin in the development of endometrial cancer (EC) among Chinese premenopausal women. In this study, 128 endometrial cancer patients and 294 controls who were all premenopausal were included. Baseline characteristics data were collected and serum insulin, C-peptide, sex hormone-binding globulin, C-reaction protein, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α levels were measured. Paired t test, χ(2) test, Spearman correlation coefficients, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used in data analysis. Furthermore, insulin levels were categorized into quartiles, and likelihood ratio was calculated for the four categories. Blood insulin levels of the patients were significantly higher than those of the controls (P < 0.001). Factor analysis identified insulin (OR = 2.46; 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 1.55-3.91; P < 0.001) as the independent risk factor of EC. When insulin levels were categorized into quartiles, we found that insulin was positively associated with endometrial cancer risk [HR comparing extreme quartiles (HR q4-q1) = 4.44; 95 % CI = 2.59-7.62; P trend = 0.025]. After adjustment for body mass index (BMI) or waist-hip ratio (WHR), this association was attenuated, but still significant. In conclusion, insulin plays an important role in the carcinogenesis of EC among premenopausal women. Treatment targeting down-regulation of blood insulin levels seems effective in the prevention of this malignancy.

OGG1 Mutations and Risk of Female Breast Cancer: Meta-Analysis and Experimental Data

In first part of this study association between OGG1 polymorphisms and breast cancer susceptibility was explored by meta-analysis. Second part of the study involved 925 subjects, used for mutational analysis of OGG1 gene using PCR-SSCP and sequencing. Fifteen mutations were observed, which included five intronic mutations, four splice site mutations, two 3'UTR mutations, three missense mutations, and a nonsense mutation. Significantly (p < 0.001) increased (~29 fold) breast cancer risk was associated with a splice site variant g.9800972T>G and 3'UTR variant g.9798848G>A. Among intronic mutations, highest (~15 fold) increase in breast cancer risk was associated with g.9793680G>A (p < 0.009). Similarly ~14-fold increased risk was associated with Val159Gly (p < 0.01), ~17-fold with Gly221Arg (p < 0.005), and ~18-fold with Ser326Cys (p < 0.004) in breast cancer patients compared with controls, whereas analysis of nonsense mutation showed that ~13-fold (p < 0.01) increased breast cancer risk was associated with Trp375STOP in patients compared to controls. In conclusion, a significant association was observed between OGG1 germ line mutations and breast cancer risk. These findings provide evidence that OGG1 may prove to be a good candidate of better diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of breast cancer.

Association analysis between 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase genetic variants and endometrial cancer susceptibility in Chinese Han population

Objectives

Numerous epidemiologic studies demonstrate that 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase gene (hOGG1) is an important candidate gene for the development of endometrial cancer (EC). The objective of this study is to evaluate the potential association between hOGG1 genetic variants and the susceptibility to EC.

Methods

In total, 218 EC patients and 243 cancer-free controls were recruited in this study.

Key findings

Our data indicate that the hOGG1 c.269C &gt; A and c.828A &gt; G genetic variants are statistically associated with the increased susceptibility to EC (for c.269C &gt; A, AA vs CC: odds ratio (OR) = 2.14, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.21 to 3.78, P = 0.008; A vs C: OR = 1.43, 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.88, P = 0.010; for c.828A &gt; G, GG vs AA: OR = 2.31, 95% CI, 1.24 to 4.30, P = 0.008; G vs A: OR = 1.35, 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.78, P = 0.032). The A allele and AA genotype of c.269C &gt; A and G allele and GG genotype of c.828A &gt; G genetic variants could contribute to the susceptibility to EC.

Conclusion

Taken together, our findings suggest that the hOGG1 c.269C &gt; A and c.828A &gt; G genetic variants are significantly associated with EC susceptibility in Chinese Han populations and might be used as molecular markers for assessing the risk of EC.

The association between XRCC1 genetic polymorphisms and the risk of endometrial carcinoma in Chinese

Accumulated evidences report that X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 gene (XRCC1) genetic polymorphisms play an important role in the development of endometrial carcinoma (EC). This study aims to evaluate the association of XRCC1 c.1161G>A and c.1804C>A genetic polymorphisms with the risk of EC. A total of 218 EC patients and 243 cancer-free controls were included in this study. The genotypes of XRCC1 genetic polymorphisms were determined by the created restriction site-polymerase chain reaction (CRS-PCR) and PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) methods. We found that these two genetic polymorphisms were statistically associated with the risk of EC. As for c.1161G>A, in comparison with GG wild genotype, the AA genotype was significantly associated with the increased risk of EC (OR=2.36, 95% CI 1.28-4.37, χ(2)=7.71, P=0.005). As for c.1804C>A, the CC genotype significantly increased the risk of EC in comparison with CC wild genotype (OR=2.77, 95% CI 1.38-5.58, χ(2)=8.54, P=0.003). Our data indicate that the A allele of c.1161G>A and c.1804C>A genetic polymorphisms could contribute to increase the risk of EC (for c.1161G>A: A versus (vs.) G, OR=1.34, 95% CI 1.02-1.76, χ(2)=4.56, P=0.033; for c.1804C>A: A vs. C, OR=1.34, 95% CI 1.01-1.77, χ(2)=4.03, P=0.045). Our results indicate that the XRCC1 c.1161G>A and c.1804C>A genetic polymorphisms significantly influenced the risk of EC in Chinese populations, and might be used as molecular markers for evaluating EC risk.

APEX nuclease (multifunctional DNA repair enzyme) 1 gene Asp148Glu polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis involving 58 articles and 48903 participants

BACKGROUND

Polymorphisms in the APEX nuclease (multifunctional DNA repair enzyme) 1 gene (APEX1) may be involved in the carcinogenesis by affecting DNA repair. We aimed to summarize available data on the association of the APEX1 Asp148Glu (rs1130409) polymorphism with risk of multiple types of cancer via a meta-analysis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In total, 58 qualified articles including 22,398 cancer patients and 26,505 controls were analyzed, and the data were extracted independently by two investigators. Analyses of the full data set indicated a marginally significant association of the APEX1 Asp148Glu polymorphism with cancer risk under allelic (odds ratio (OR)=1.05; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.99-1.11; P=0.071), dominant (OR=1.09; 95% CI: 1.01-1.17; P=0.028), and heterozygous genotypic (OR=1.08; 95% CI: 1.01-1.16; P=0.026) models, with significant heterogeneity and publication bias. In subgroup analyses by cancer type, with a Bonferroni corrected alpha of 0.05/6, significant association was observed for gastric cancer under both dominant (OR=1.74; 95% CI: 1.2-2.51; P=0.003) and heterozygous genotypic (OR=1.66; 95% CI: 1.2-2.31; P=0.002) models. In subgroup analysis by ethnicity, risk estimates were augmented in Caucasians, especially under dominant (OR=1.11; 95% CI: 1.0-1.24; P=0.049) and heterozygous genotypic (OR=1.11; 95% CI: 0.99-1.24; P=0.063) models. By study design, there were no significant differences between population-based and hospital-based studies. In subgroup analysis by sample size, risk estimates were remarkably overestimated in small studies, and no significance was reached in large studies except under the heterozygous genotypic model (OR=1.23; 95% CI: 1.06-1.43; P=0.006, significant at a Bonferroni corrected alpha of 0.05/2). By quality score, the risk estimates, albeit nonsignificant, were higher in low-quality studies than in high-quality studies. Further meta-regression analyses failed to identify any contributory confounders for the associated risk estimates.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that APEX1 Asp148Glu polymorphism might be a genetic risk factor for the development of gastric cancer. Further investigations on large populations are warranted.

Polymorphisms in base excision repair genes are associated with endometrial cancer risk among postmenopausal Japanese women

OBJECTIVES

Polymorphisms in base excision repair (BER) genes are associated with risk for several types of cancers but have not been studied with respect to endometrial cancer among Japanese women. Therefore, we conducted a case-control study to explore the association between polymorphisms in BER genes and the risk for endometrial cancer.

METHODS/MATERIALS

This study included a total of 91 postmenopausal subjects with endometrial cancer and 261 controls without cancer who visited the Aichi Cancer Center between 2001 and 2005. We focused on single nucleotide polymorphisms within coding regions of 5 BER genes (OGG1, MUTYH, XRCC1, APEX1, and PARP1). To assess lifestyle in the etiology of endometrial cancer, we used a self-administered questionnaire. Associations were evaluated using multivariate unconditional logistic regression models. We also assessed whether there were intergenic associations or an interaction with obesity.

RESULTS

We observed a significant association between endometrial cancer risk and XRCC1 rs1799782 (C > T, Arg194Trp) and XRCC1 rs25487 (G > A, Arg399Gln). We uncovered a significant association between obesity (body mass index, ≥ 25) and rs25487. The XRCC1 polymorphisms were in complete linkage disequilibrium, and the XRCC1 haplotype TG associated significantly with endometrial cancer risk. The interaction between the CA haplotype and body mass index was marginally significant, whereas interaction between haplotype in XRCC1 and rs1136410 (PARP1) was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a significant association between endometrial cancer risk and XRCC1 polymorphisms and haplotype TG in postmenopausal Japanese women.