Endothelial cell protein C receptor promotes MGC803 gastric cancer cells proliferation and migration by activating ERK1/2

New insights into vitamin K biology with relevance to cancer

Phylloquinone (vitamin K1) and menaquinones (vitamin K2 family) are essential for post-translational γ-carboxylation of a small number of proteins, including clotting factors. These modified proteins have now been implicated in diverse physiological and pathological processes including cancer. Vitamin K intake has been inversely associated with cancer incidence and mortality in observational studies. Newly discovered functions of vitamin K in cancer cells include activation of the steroid and xenobiotic receptor (SXR) and regulation of oxidative stress, apoptosis, and autophagy. We provide an update of vitamin K biology, non-canonical mechanisms of vitamin K actions, the potential functions of vitamin K-dependent proteins in cancer, and observational trials on vitamin K intake and cancer.

Role of Extracellular High-Mobility Group Box-1 as a Therapeutic Target of Gastric Cancer

Background: High-mobility group box-1 (HMGB1) is involved in the tumorigenesis and metastasis of various cancers. The present study investigated the roles of extracellular HMGB1 in the progression of gastric cancer (GC) and the therapeutic effects of recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (rTM) targeting HMGB1. Methods: The effects of extracellular HMGB1 and rTM on GC cells were assessed using proliferation and Transwell assays. Their effects on local tumor growth and metastasis were evaluated using subcutaneous tumor and liver metastasis mouse models, respectively. Plasma HMGB1 concentrations in GC patients were measured using ELISA. The relationships between plasma HMGB1 concentrations and the prognosis and clinicopathological factors of patients were also investigated. Results: GC proliferation, migration, and invasion abilities were promoted by increases in extracellular HMGB1 concentrations and alleviated by rTM. In the subcutaneous tumor model, local tumor growth was promoted by the addition of rhHMGB1 and alleviated by rTM. Similar changes occurred in the liver metastasis model. Recurrence-free survival (p < 0.01) and overall survival (p = 0.01) were significantly worse in patients with high plasma HMGB1 concentrations. Conclusion: Plasma HMGB1 concentrations are a prognostic marker in GC patients. Extracellular HMGB1 promotes cancer progression and has potential as a novel treatment target in GC cells for rTM.

Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) depend on MMP1 for their cancer-promoting role

The complex interaction between tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and tumor cells through several soluble factors and signaling is essential for colorectal cancer (CRC) progression. However, the molecular mechanism involved remains elusive. In this study, we demonstrated that MMP1 derived from TAMs markedly facilitated colon cancer cell proliferation via accelerating cell cycle transition from G0/G1 to S and G2/M phase. Moreover, exogenous MMP1 activated cdc25a/CDK4-cyclin D1 and p21/cdc2-cyclin B1 complexes through altering c-Myc and ETV4. Mechanistic studies indicated that inhibition of PAR1 or blockage of MAPK/Erk signaling eliminated the proliferation induced by exogenous MMP1 in vitro and in vivo. In addition, ETV4 could bind to the promoter of MMP1 and activate MMP1 transcription, which confirmed the MMP1/ETV4/MMP1 positive feedback. Altogether, our study identified a cytokine paracrine manner between colon cancer cells and TAMs. MMP1/PAR1/Erk1/2/ETV4 positive feedback loop may represent to be a therapeutic target and prognostic marker in CRC.

Coagulation factor 2 thrombin receptor promotes malignancy in glioma under SOX2 regulation

Glioma is the most common human primary brain cancer with high mortality and unfavorable clinical outcome. Coagulation factor 2 thrombin receptor (F2R), is a key component in the thrombosis process and has been demonstrated upregulated in various cancers. However, the effect and molecular mechanisms of F2R in glioma remains unclear. In our study, we confirmed that the expression of F2R was upregulated in glioma and predicted poor prognosis. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) and function assays demonstrated that F2R overexpression promoted glioma cell proliferation, metastasis and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in vitro and tumor growth in vivo. Then, we identified and validated F2R was the target gene of SRY-box 2 (SOX2) by dual luciferase reporter assay and chromatin immunoprecipitation assay. Besides, High expression of F2R in malignant glioma was associated with β-catenint signaling pathway activation. Our findings conclude that F2R promotes glioma cell proliferation and metastasis under SOX2 and actives WNT/β-catenin Signaling pathway, which provides novel insight to the therapeutic regimen in glioma.

Endothelial Protein C Receptor (EPCR), Protease Activated Receptor-1 (PAR-1) and Their Interplay in Cancer Growth and Metastatic Dissemination

Endothelial protein C receptor (EPCR) and protease activated receptor 1 (PAR-1) by themselves play important role in cancer growth and dissemination. Moreover, interactions between the two receptors are essential for tumor progression. EPCR is a cell surface transmembrane glycoprotein localized predominantly on endothelial cells (ECs). It is a vital component of the activated protein C (APC)—mediated anticoagulant and cytoprotective signaling cascade. PAR-1, which belongs to a family of G protein–coupled cell surface receptors, is also widely distributed on endothelial and blood cells, where it plays a critical role in hemostasis. Both EPCR and PAR-1, generally considered coagulation-related receptors, are implicated in carcinogenesis and dissemination of diverse tumor types, and their expression correlates with clinical outcome of cancer patients. Existing data explain some mechanisms by which EPCR/PAR-1 affects cancer growth and metastasis; however, the exact molecular basis of cancer invasion associated with the signaling is still obscure. Here, we discuss the role of EPCR and PAR-1 reciprocal interactions in cancer progression as well as potential therapeutic options targeted specifically to interact with EPCR/PAR-1-induced signaling in cancer patients.

EPCR promotes MGC803 human gastric cancer cell tumor angiogenesis in vitro through activating ERK1/2 and AKT in a PAR1-dependent manner

The endothelial cell protein C receptor (EPCR) serves a key role in activated protein C (APC)-mediated cytoprotective effects in endothelial cells, and is involved in the development of certain types of human cancer. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to demonstrate that EPCR may exert effects on gastric cancer angiogenesis in vitro. To detect microvessel density (MVD), the microvascular endothelial cells were stained for cluster of differentiation (CD)31 and CD34 in 61 cases of surgical resection of gastric carcinoma tissues, and the association between the expression of EPCR protein and MVD was analyzed. In addition, to analyze the effect of EPCR expressed by gastric cancer cells on the proliferation, migration and angiogenic abilities of endothelial cells, human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were cultured with tumor-conditioned medium derived from EPCR knockdown or protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1)-blocked MGC803 gastric cancer cells. A CCK-8 assay was used to assess the proliferation ability of the HUVECs. A Transwell assay was performed to assess the migration ability of the HUVECs and a Matrigel-based tube formation assay was used to assess the angiogenic activity of the HUVECs. The results demonstrated that the expression of EPCR was correlated with the MVD of gastric cancer tissues. When cultured with tumor-conditioned medium derived from EPCR knockdown or PAR1-blocked MGC803 cells, the proliferation, migration and tubules formation abilities of HUVECs were markedly inhibited markedly. The expression of phosphorylated (p)-extracellular signal regulated kinase 1/2, p-protein kinase B (AKT; s473) and p-AKT (T308) in the HUVECs was decreased. In addition, EPCR knockdown inhibited PAR1 activation in the MGC803 cells. These results indicated that the expression of EPCR in gastric cancer cell line MGC803 contributes to tumor angiogenesis in vitro by activating ERK1/2 and AKT, and that this effect of EPCR is dependent on PAR1 activation.

TGF-β induced PAR-1 expression promotes tumor progression and osteoclast differentiation in giant cell tumor of bone

Although protease activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) has been confirmed as an oncogene in many cancers, the role of PAR-1 in giant cell tumor (GCT) of bone has been rarely reported. The mechanism of PAR-1 in tumor-induced osteoclastogenesis still remains unclear. In the present study, we detected that PAR-1 was significantly upregulated in GCT of bone compared to normal tissues, while TGF-β was also overexpressed in GCT tissues and could promote the expression of PAR-1 in a dose and time dependent manner. Using the luciferase reporter assay, we found that two downstreams of TGF-β, Smad3 and Smad4, could activate the promoter of PAR-1, which might explain the mechanism of TGF-β induced PAR-1 expression. Meanwhile, PAR-1 was also overexpressed in microvesicles from stromal cells of GCT (GCTSCs), and might be transported from GCTSCs to monocytes through microvesicles. In addition, knockout of PAR-1 by TALENs in GCTSCs inhibited tumor growth, angiogenesis and osteoclastogenesis in GCT in vitro. Using the chick CAM models, we further showed that inhibition of PAR-1 suppressed tumor growth and giant cell formation in vivo. Using microarray assay, we detected a number of genes involved in osteoclastogenesis as the possible downstreams of PAR-1, which may partly explain the mechanism of PAR-1 in GCT. In brief, for the first time, these results reveal an upstream regulatory role of TGF-β in PAR-1 expression, and PAR-1 expression promotes tumor growth, angiogenesis and osteoclast differentiation in GCT of bone. Hence, PAR-1 represents a novel potential therapeutic target for GCT of bone.

Protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1): a promising molecular target for cancer

PAR-1 is expressed not only in epithelium, neurons, astrocytes, immune cells, but also in cancer-associated fibroblasts, ECs (epithelial cells), myocytes of blood vessels, mast cells, and macrophages in tumor microenvironment, whereas PAR-1 stimulates macrophages to synthesize and secrete thrombin as well as other growth factors, resulting in enhanced cell proliferation, tumor growth and metastasis. Therefore, considerable effort has been devoted to the development of inhibitors targeting PAR-1. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of PAR-1’s role in cancer invasiveness and dissemination, as well as potential therapeutic strategies targeting PAR-1 signaling.

Endothelial protein C receptor is overexpressed in colorectal cancer as a result of amplification and hypomethylation of chromosome 20q

Endothelial Protein C Receptor (EPCR) is a Major Histocompatibility Complex homologue, with established roles downregulating coagulation and in endothelial protection. Expressed predominantly on endothelium, EPCR affects inflammatory, apoptotic and cell proliferation pathways by binding to activated protein C (APC). However, EPCR can also be expressed on cancer cells, although the underlying reasons are unclear. Moreover, although EPCR has been linked with chemosensitivity in lung cancer, its clinical significance in many tumours is unknown. Here, we explored its significance in colorectal cancer (CRC). Bioinformatic methods revealed EPCR overexpression in many epithelial cancers, which was confirmed on CRC epithelial tumour cells by immunohistochemistry. EPCR upregulation resulted from gene amplification and DNA hypomethylation, and occurred in concert with a cohort of neighbouring genes on chromosome 20q, a region previously implicated in chemoresistance. As in endothelial cells, EPCR reproducibly mediated ERK pathway activation in a model CRC cell line following APC treatment. However, EPCR knockdown studies failed to highlight compelling EPCR‐intrinsic impact on CRC cell phenotype, with limited effects on chemosensitivity and no effect on invasion observed, while EPCR appeared to decrease CRC cell migration. Consistent with these observations, differential EPCR expression did not influence response to chemotherapy in a human CRC cohort. Our results provide a compelling explanation for how EPCR is upregulated in diverse epithelial malignancies. They indicate that the clinical significance of EPCR varies across different tumour types. Furthermore, they raise the possibility that the prognostic significance of EPCR in certain tumours relates significantly to co‐upregulation of neighbouring genes on chromosome 20q. Therefore, efforts to exploit EPCR as a prognostic marker should be focussed on specific tumours, and in such scenarios EPCR‐co‐dysregulated genes may represent potential axes for therapeutic intervention.