Nutrition care is an integral part of patient-centred medical care: a European consensus

Unraveling the nutritional challenges in epilepsy: Risks, deficiencies, and management strategies: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition and epilepsy share a complex bidirectional relationship, with malnutrition serving as a potential risk factor for epilepsy development, while epilepsy, in turn, often exerts profound effects on nutritional status. Nutritional interventions have emerged as a critical adjunctive approach in epilepsy management.

AIM

To explore the multifaceted associations between malnutrition and epilepsy, structured into three primary sections: (1) Elucidating the impact of malnutrition as a risk factor for epilepsy onset; (2) Examining the reciprocal influence of epilepsy on nutritional status, and (3) Evaluating diverse nutritional interventions in the management of epilepsy.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases utilizing defined keywords related to malnutrition, epilepsy, and nutritional interventions. Inclusion criteria encompassed various study types, including clinical trials, animal models, cohort studies, case reports, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, guidelines, editorials, and review articles. Four hundred sixteen pertinent references were identified, with 198 review articles, 153 research studies, 21 case reports, 24 meta-analyses, 14 systematic reviews, 4 guidelines, and 2 editorials meeting the predefined criteria.

RESULTS

The review revealed the intricate interplay between malnutrition and epilepsy, highlighting malnutrition as a potential risk factor in epilepsy development and elucidating how epilepsy often leads to nutritional deficiencies. Findings underscored the importance of nutritional interventions in managing epilepsy, showing their impact on seizure frequency, neuronal function, and overall brain health.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review emphasizes the bidirectional relationship between malnutrition and epilepsy while emphasizing the critical role of nutritional management in epilepsy treatment. The multifaceted insights underscore the need for a holistic approach to addressing nutritional aspects alongside conventional epilepsy management strategies.

Enhancing Nutrition Care in Primary Healthcare: Exploring Practices, Barriers, and Multidisciplinary Solutions in Ireland

Good nutrition promotes a healthy population and mitigates the risk of disease. Integrating nutrition care in the primary healthcare system is considered an essential plan of action to manage poor nutritional status in the population. The role of primary healthcare professionals (HCPs) in the delivery of nutrition care is especially crucial due to a current lack of dietitians and dietary support in the primary care setting in Ireland. This qualitative research explored the current practice, barriers, facilitators, and feasible solutions proposed to optimize the provision of nutrition care by primary HCPs. Twenty semi-structured interviews (pharmacists (n = 14), dietitians (n = 3), a physiotherapist (n = 1), a speech and language therapist (n = 1), and a healthcare assistant (n = 1) were conducted. Six themes were derived from the data: current practice of nutrition care in primary care, perceived role, barriers and facilitators, the importance of a multidisciplinary patient-centred approach, training needs and preferences, and addressing barriers. Participants acknowledged the importance of nutrition care in clinical practice, the principal role of the dietitian as part of the multidisciplinary team, and the essential clinical competencies and nutrition training models that may facilitate the provision of nutrition care in primary practice. A paradigm shift to a multidisciplinary care model that prioritises the integration of nutrition care into primary care practice to ensure optimal dietary counselling is afforded to patients is essential.

The Role of Registered Dietitians in Cancer Palliative Care: Responsibilities, Challenges, and Interdisciplinary Collaboration-A Cross-Sectional Survey

Registered dietitians (RDs) in palliative care help maintain patients' quality of life by providing personalized nutritional support that alleviates eating-related distress. This study aimed to clarify the role of RDs in palliative care by examining their responsibilities and challenges in caring for cancer patients. A nationwide mailed survey was conducted in 2022, focusing on RDs involved in cancer palliative care. One RD per facility was included from all 501 hospitals accredited by Japan's Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Multivariate analysis identified factors related to collaboration with palliative care teams and challenges in cancer care. Responses from 325 RDs (63.9%) across 325 hospitals (63.9%) were analyzed. Among RDs who consistently collaborated with the palliative care team (PCT), significant associations (p < 0.05) were found with exclusive engagement in cancer/palliative care, providing nutritional counseling to inpatients, the frequency of ward rounds, and individualized meal provision. Challenges included the following: "I struggled with determining appropriate food choices for patients unable to eat", and "Metabolic complications like cachexia hindered my ability to provide adequate support". RDs play a crucial role in providing individualized meals for cancer patients through PCT collaboration and ward rounds. To ensure effective support in challenging situations, RDs must be exclusively engaged in palliative care and receive specialized education.

"One Size Doesn't Fit All": Nutrition Care Needs in Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Survivors-A Qualitative Study

Background/Objectives: Nutritional complications are highly prevalent in esophageal and gastric cancer survivors and can negatively impact their quality of life. Gaining insight into survivors' experiences with nutrition care can inform the development of tailored nutrition care programs for this population. The present study investigated esophageal and gastric cancer survivors' nutritional challenges and complications. It also explored survivors' and their carers' perceived unmet nutrition care needs. Methods: Esophageal and gastric cancer survivors and their caregivers were invited to participate in a semi-structured interview. Participants were asked about their nutritional challenges and experiences with existing dietetic services in meeting their nutrition care needs. Data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's six-stage approach to thematic analysis. Results: Twelve individual interviews were completed and analyzed, and three themes emerged: nutrition-related challenges and complications, experiences with dietetic services, and coping strategies. Persistent gastrointestinal symptoms were reported as the main nutritional challenges impacting survivors' daily and social lives. While participants reported good access to dietetic services, they emphasized the need for additional support during early post-surgery stages and long-term survivorship. Key unmet needs included access to personalized dietary advice for symptom management and timely information on nutritional challenges and post-treatment complications. Conclusions: The present study underscores the need for increased dietitian support throughout the esophageal and gastric cancer journey to provide timely, personalized, and practical dietary information for survivors and their caregivers. These insights should be considered for developing tailored nutrition care programs for esophageal and gastric cancer survivors.

Advances in Food-As-Medicine Interventions and Their Impact on Future Food Production, Processing, and Supply Chains

Food-as-medicine (FAM) is an emerging trend among medical doctors, health insurers, startups, and governmental public-health and nongovernmental organizations. FAM implies using food as a part of an individual's health plan to prevent or help treat acute and chronic health conditions and diseases. We highlight trends and hurdles in the FAM intervention pyramid. Our viewpoint is to indicate how interventions might change the future demand for specific food groups, their transport in supply chains, and the technologies used to process them. On the basis of national guidelines, dietary interventions can help to prevent and treat many diseases, including cardiovascular disease, cancers, type 2 diabetes, and obesity. FAM R&D and services offer more individualized treatments. This is challenging given the interindividual variability and complexity of the body's response to food and related factors, such as dietary habits, genetics, lifestyle, and biosphere. Quantifying health improvements is essential to prove the added value of more individualized FAM interventions compared with adopting a general healthy diet. It is unclear which level of individualization of interventions produces the largest health benefits at the lowest costs for the patient, healthcare system, and climate. FAM interventions can support and complement conventional medical treatment. They will require a shift to producing more health-promoting foods, including whole foods, minimally processed foods, and selected processed foods. The food processing industry and supply chains must adapt to these new scenarios. Auxiliary technologies and methods are enablers, including delivery services, wearable technology, health-monitoring apps, and data-driven consumer behavior analysis.

Self-Determination, Optimism, Social Support, Knowledge, and Skills Have a Positive Influence on the Oral Intake of Long-Stay Acute Patients: A Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND

Although previous research has attempted to understand the barriers and enablers of oral intake in hospitalized patients, these studies have mainly focused on short-stay inpatients and lacked a theory-driven examination of the determinants that influence dietary behavior in the hospital.

OBJECTIVE

To explore and compare the factors influencing adequate and poor oral intake in long-stay acute patients (admitted >14 days).

DESIGN

A qualitative descriptive study with semistructured interviews.

PARTICIPANTS/SETTING

Twenty-one adult inpatients (13 men, 8 women) admitted to 2 medical and 2 surgical wards at a tertiary hospital in Brisbane, Australia, during 2022, stratified by the Subjective Global Assessment. Analysis performed Transcripts were initially deductively analyzed against the Theoretical Domains Framework, and a reflexive thematic approach was used to create overall themes.

RESULTS

Of the 21 included patients (median age = 68.0 years, IQR 34 years), 11 had adequate/improved intake and 10 poor/decreased intake. Six themes were identified to have influenced oral intake in long-stay patients: self-determination to eat; nutrition impact symptoms; foodservice characteristics and processes; nutrition-related knowledge and skills; social support; and optimism, emotions, and emotion regulation. Patients with adequate/improved oral intake were characterized by an autonomous motivation to eat. They had increased awareness about their nutritional status, knowledge, and skills about food for recovery, were more optimistic, and social support was an important enabler to eating. In contrast, patients with poor/decreased oral intake perceived nutrition impact symptoms and dislike of meals as the main barriers to eating in the hospital; however, they also expressed more negative emotions, reduced coping strategies, and decreased knowledge, skills, intrinsic motivation, and capabilities to eat. Social support was present but did not enable oral intake in this patient group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides novel insights into the factors that influenced oral intake in long-stay acute patients, highlighting the importance of patient-centered nutrition care, encompassing motivational interviewing techniques and collaboration from the multidisciplinary team to create a supportive environment that fosters autonomy and empowers patients to actively participate in their own nutrition and recovery.

Practical cancer nutrition, from guidelines to clinical practice: a digital solution to patient-centred care

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition affects 20%-70% of cancer patients, depending on tumour type, disease stage, and clinical setting. While nutritional care is essential for improving patients' quality of life and clinical outcomes, it is not systematically integrated into routine cancer care. MyPath is a European Union project aiming to implement patient-centred care (PCC) at nine European cancer centres using implementation science. Multidisciplinary teams have developed standardised digitally supported PCC pathways based on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with linked evidence-based management options. Through systematic assessment and management of common symptoms and psychosocial problems in cancer patients, MyPath aims to facilitate changes in clinical practice to improve PCC for all. As part of this, the MyPath Nutrition Care Pathway (NCP) aims to facilitate necessary clinical changes to routinely assess and address nutrition in all patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between September 2022 and August 2024, an international multidisciplinary team reviewed evidence-based nutrition guidelines to select relevant PROs and other variables necessary to systematically assess patients, allowing for tailored nutritional care.

RESULTS

The MyPath NCP assessment relies on nutritional status (Malnutrition Screening Tool for malnutrition risk, modified Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria for malnutrition, and body mass index/weight change for obesity/unintentional weight gain), health status (functional status, cancer diagnosis and prognosis, and prehabilitation needs), and inflammatory status (C-reactive protein levels). Based on this assessment, the digital solution suggests tailored, evidence-based nutritional interventions. Continuous monitoring through PROs and clinical consultations will customise care to patients' dynamic nutritional needs. The first version of this digital solution will be piloted in 2025.

CONCLUSIONS

Inconsistent implementation of nutrition guidelines is a key challenge in cancer care. The MyPath NCP offers an accessible, patient-centred assessment and management system that integrates nutritional care into routine cancer care, providing a versatile solution that can be implemented across diverse health care settings.

Dietitian-Provided Interventions for Adults with Cancer: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews

Malnutrition is common in adults with cancer and is associated with lower quality of life and higher risk of mortality. A comprehensive picture of dietitian efficacy in cancer care is needed to inform payers and policymakers about effective care options. The objective of this umbrella review of systematic reviews (SRs) is to examine the impact of dietitian interventions, compared to no intervention or usual care, on nutrition-related outcomes in adults with all types and stages of cancer. MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of SRs, Food Science Source, and SPORTSDiscus databases were searched for SRs and meta-analyses published from 2018 to September 2024. The GRADE method was used to rate evidence certainty. There were 2,087 articles identified in the search, 125 full texts were examined for eligibility, and seven SRs were included in this umbrella review, representing 25 randomized controlled trials and six observational studies. Interventions provided by dietitians may improve nutrition status, protein and energy intake, length of stay, and quality of life, but evidence certainty was low, primarily due to the risk of bias in primary studies, heterogeneity, and lack of precise effect size. Providing dietitian-led interventions for adults with cancer may improve a wide range of nutrition-related outcomes.

Nutrition Care in Cancer: An Overlooked Part of Patient-Centered Care

OBJECTIVES

Robust evidence highlights the crucial role of nutrition for people with cancer, and international organizations recognize it as a basic human right linked to health and food. Within this context, we aim to emphasize the critical role of nutrition care for cancer patients and to highlight the essential contributions of nurses in providing patient-centered nutrition care.

METHODS

This opinion paper synthesizes evidence and perspectives from peer-reviewed articles and position papers. Furthermore, insights were drawn from the European Commission's Health Policy Platform thematic network "Integrated Nutrition Cancer Care".

RESULTS

Implementation of nutrition care is inconsistent, which can lead to inequalities in care. In oncology, nutrition care is vital as nutrition-related issues significantly impact clinical and patient outcomes. Studies show that cancer nurses can effectively integrate and manage nutrition care. Failure to address nutrition issues negatively impacts an array of patient outcomes and reduces quality of life. Thus, integrating nutrition care throughout routine cancer care is essential.

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer nurses, as core multidisciplinary team members, are often the initial and consistent contact for cancer patients. They are ideally positioned to play a key role in securing nutrition care throughout the trajectory of cancer care.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Cancer nurses should be empowered and enabled to manage all aspects of nutrition care in tandem with dietitians. This approach can improve patient outcomes, enhance quality of life, and ensure equitable access to essential nutrition care for all cancer patients.

Malnutrition Diagnosed via Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) Criteria - Association with Clinical Outcomes and Predictive Value: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews

OBJECTIVES

Malnutrition is very common in people with cancer. The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) recommendation on criteria has been proposed as a gold standard for diagnosing malnutrition. The diagnosis of malnutrition includes phenotypic criteria such as unintentional weight loss and etiologic criteria such as reduced food intake. The aim of this review is to summarise the evidence on the GLIM-defined malnutrition association with clinical outcomes and its predictive value.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, and MEDLINE databases. A total of 6 systematic reviews with and without meta-analysis were identified and included for analysis. Five were systematic reviews with meta-analyses and 1 systematic review without meta-analysis.

RESULTS

GLIM-defined malnutrition is associated with decreased survival, disease-free survival, increased post-operative complications, increased overall complications, and prolonged length of stay. It has predictive value for worsening clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The results support the use of GLIM criteria and indicate their predictive value for clinical outcomes. There is robust evidence indicating the association and predictive value of GLIM-defined malnutrition for clinical outcomes in people with cancer to recommend its use in clinical practice. Thus, the GLIM criteria depend on prior screening tools used and the consistency of muscle mass assessment.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Nutrition care is a fundamental aspect of cancer nursing practice and nurses need to be aware of the signs of malnutrition. The GLIM criteria are relevant to be used also in cancer nursing practice for the early detection of malnutrition among people with cancer.

Unmet Supportive Care Needs of Lung Cancer Survival Patients at Different Cancer Stages and Treatment Phases

Purpose

This study examined the unmet supportive care needs of lung cancer patients across different cancer stages and treatment phases, as well as the factors associated with these unmet needs.

Patients and methods

Data from 501 lung cancer patients at a cancer center in central Taiwan were analyzed to assess their unmet supportive care needs across dimensions such as health information, patient care, treatment, nutrition, psychosocial, and economic needs. Associations with sex, age, cancer stage, and treatment phase were investigated.

Results

Compared with male patients, female patients exhibited fewer unmet health information needs (aOR=0.40; p=0.021). Older patients had greater patient care needs than younger patients did (aOR=3.08, p=0.026). Patients in the in-treatment (p<0.001) and follow-up (p=0.025) phases exhibited significantly lower needs for health information than did those in the newly diagnosed phase. Similarly, patients in the treatment (aOR=0.42, p=0.006), recurrence (aOR=0.24, p=0.043), and follow-up (aOR=0.12, p=0.007) phases exhibited significantly lower needs for patient care than did those in the newly diagnosed phase. Regarding treatment needs, patients in the treatment phase also demonstrated lower needs than did those in the newly diagnosed phase (aOR=0.12, p=0.004). Patients in the treatment phase had lower nutritional needs than did those in the newly diagnosed phase (aOR=0.54, p=0.043). However, psychosocial needs were greater during the treatment (aOR=2.75, p=0.004) and recurrence phases (aOR=7.61, p=0.001).

Conclusion

The unmet needs of lung cancer patients vary based on demographic characteristics and disease-related factors. Patients in the newly diagnosed phase have significantly higher unmet needs compared to other stages. Therefore, Healthcare professionals should provide appropriate and timely individualized care to address these needs.

Near-Death Quality of Life in Cancer Patients on Home Parenteral Nutrition

Background: The impact of home parenteral nutrition (HPN) on the quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients has been previously investigated. However, scarce data are available regarding near-death QoL in patients with cancer receiving HPN. This study aims to investigate the changes of QoL in these patients in the last two months before death. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a previous, prospective, longitudinal, observational study. QoL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Results: Eighty-four adult cancer patients who died on HPN and had filled out the questionnaire between 31 and 60 days (M2) and within 30 days prior (M1) to death were included in this analysis. The questionnaires filled out at M2 and M1 were compared with those filled out by the same patients at HPN start (T0). At M2, there was a significant improvement in both the global QoL and symptoms scales (p < 0.001 and p < 0.033, respectively), while at M1, a significant improvement in the global QoL scale persisted (p < 0.035) compared with T0. Conclusions: Our study first reports that HPN, if started early and according to European guidelines, is associated with an improvement in the QoL of patients with cancer even in the last two months before death.

Nutrition Assessment and Counseling in Integrative Cancer Care: Effects on Patient Self-Reported Symptoms

BACKGROUND

Nutrition guidance can affect treatment and survival outcomes for patients with cancer. The effect of a single nutrition consult on patient-reported outcomes is not well known. This study describes characteristics of patients referred for a single outpatient nutrition consult in an integrative oncology center at a cancer hospital, examining effects on self-reported symptoms.

METHODS

We completed a retrospective chart review of 1517 adult oncology patients who completed a single nutrition consult. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and reasons for referral were extracted. Modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (mESAS) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS10) scores were collected. Standard descriptive statistics and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used.

RESULTS

Most patients were white, women, overweight/obese with breast cancer and non-advanced disease, mean age 55.3 years. Primary reasons for referral were "lifestyle change," "overweight weight-related," and "nutrition knowledge deficit." PROMIS10 results were average. Other than sleep and hot flashes, mESAS symptom scores at baseline were in the mild range. All change scores after nutrition consult were statistically but not clinically significant.

CONCLUSION

Patients presenting for nutrition counseling had a mild symptom burden at baseline and experienced statistically, not clinically, significant improvement in self-reported symptoms following a single visit. Additional research is needed to explore strategies to enhance the intervention and understand the effects of multiple follow-up sessions.

Eliminating Digestive Irregularities Caused by Late Effects: A Pilot Study of an Innovative Culinary Nutrition Intervention for Reducing Gastrointestinal Toxicity in Gynecologic Cancer Patients Who Have Undergone Pelvic Radiotherapy

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Pelvic radiotherapy (RT) improves survival in gynecologic cancer patients but often results in gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, affecting quality of life. Standard nutrition guidance lacks specificity for these survivors, complicating dietary choices. To address this gap, the EDIBLE intervention was developed to offer structured dietary self-management skills to alleviate RT-induced GI toxicity.

METHODS

We conducted a single-arm mixed-methods pilot of the EDIBLE intervention among post-treatment gynecologic cancer survivors to assess its feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects on GI symptoms, knowledge, and self-efficacy, with measures at baseline (T1), post-intervention (T2), and after 3 months (T3).

RESULTS

Qualitative interviews supported strong perceptions of intervention feasibility; however, the recruitment (32%) and retention (72%) rates were modest, indicating that alternate formats for program delivery may be needed to make it more accessible. The acceptability of the EDIBLE intervention garnered especially high ratings on measures of satisfaction and utility, with program improvements largely rallying around a desire for increased in-class sessions and program expansion. Statistically significant improvements were observed at the three-month mark (T3), such as enhanced confidence in culinary practices, increased knowledge and skills with regard to managing GI side effects, and improvements in bowel and GI symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest EDIBLE is acceptable, improving GI symptoms and self-efficacy; however, moderate recruitment rates indicate refinement is needed. A randomized control trial and cost-effectiveness analysis is needed to confirm effectiveness and scalability.

The role of diet in cancer: the potential of shaping public policy and clinical outcomes in the UK

Cancer universally represents one of the largest public health concerns, substantially contributing to global disease burden and mortality. The multifaceted interplay of environmental and genetic factors in the disease aetiology and progression has required comprehensive research to elucidate modifiable elements which can reduce the risk of incidence and improve prognosis. Among these factors, diet and nutrition have emerged as the most fundamental with a significant potential for influence and effect. Nutrition is not only an essential part of human survival, but also a vital determinant of overall health. Certain dietary requirements are necessary to support normal physiology. This includes individualised levels of macronutrients (proteins, carbohydrates and fats) and specific micronutrients (vitamins and minerals). Extensive research has demonstrated that diet plays a role in cancer pathogenesis at the genetic, epigenetic and cellular level. Therefore, its potential as a modifiable determinant of cancer pathogenesis for the purpose of prevention and improving management of disease must be further explored and implemented. The ability to influence cancer incidence and outcomes through dietary changes is underutilised in clinical practice and insufficiently recognised among the general public, healthcare professionals and policy-makers. Dietary changes offer the opportunity for autonomy and control over individuals health outcomes. Research has revealed that particular dietary components, as well as cultural behaviours and epidemiological patterns may act as causative or protective factors in cancer development. This review aims to comprehensively synthesise this research to further explore how to best utilise this knowledge within the community and clinical environment for more effective cancer prevention and therapeutic strategies. The identified key areas for improvement include the development of more specific, widely accepted guidelines, promoting increased involvement of dieticians within cancer multidisciplinary teams, enhancing nutritional education for healthcare professionals and exploring the potential implementation of personalised nutrition tools. A greater understanding of the complex interactions between diet and cancer will facilitate informed clinical interventions and public health policies to reduce global cancer burden and improve care for cancer patients and survivors.

Illuminating the nutrition-related policy-practice gaps in colorectal cancer survivorship

PURPOSE

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the three most commonly diagnosed cancers globally, after breast and lung cancer, with an estimated 2 million new cases each year, comprising ten per cent of all cancers worldwide. CRC has a complex aetiology associated with several nutrition-related risk factors. Cancer survivors frequently report alterations to their dietary habits and nutritional intake, with related adverse impacts on health-related quality of life (QOL). Whilst nutrition-related factors are recognised as survivor priorities and embedded in survivor care policies, dietary support is frequently not the standard of care in practice.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this Commentary, we present details of a critical policy-practice gap for CRC survivors across the spectrum of nutrition care that we have seen growing in the literature, in hospitals, community and private practice.

CONCLUSION

As these nutrition concerns can adversely impact QOL and morbidity and mortality risks, we hope to raise awareness of these issues to provide a basis of future work in this area, so that policymakers and clinicians can improve support and outcomes for CRC survivors and their families.

Cancer Care and Nutrition Counseling: The Role of the Oncologist in Patient Learning and Behavior Change

Background

Cancer remains a leading chronic disease in the United States with a high burden of disease and challenging treatment protocol. Nutrition is critically linked to long-term health outcomes and recovery rates among cancer patients, but there remains a persistent gap in clinician training regarding functional nutrition. This study interviews patients to understand their experiences of nutrition support they received while in cancer treatment.

Objectives

Understand patient experiences and needs regarding cancer treatment (i.e., surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, and/or immunotherapy) and available nutrition counseling.

Methods

This was a multi-phase study incorporating survey data (n = 50) and follow-up, semi-structured interviews (n = 20) of cancer patients in the Mid-Atlantic United States. Interview participants included those undergoing active cancer treatment (n = 7) and those in remission at the time of contact (n = 13). Participants shared their experiences receiving treatment and their perspectives regarding the quality of care they received in outpatient oncology clinics. Central to this study was a discussion regarding the quality of nutrition counseling they received while in treatment.

Results

Five themes emerged through data collection and analysis: (1) patients need additional education regarding nutrition, (2) personalized resources are not readily available, (3) perceptions from patients that oncologists receive little formal nutrition training related to cancer, (4) oncologists' attitude toward nutrition may influence patient care, and (5) patients seek nutrition information through informal sources. Commonly, patients had little access to licensed dieticians or other professionals capable of providing lifestyle recommendations.

Conclusions

The results of this study are being used to develop a clinician toolbox of resources, recommendations, and services that can be shared with patients seeking additional information regarding nutrition and diet change.

Management of cancer cachexia towards optimizing care delivery and patient outcomes

Cancer cachexia is a complex syndrome characterized by progressive weight loss, muscle mass depletion, and systemic inflammation, profoundly affecting the well-being and treatment outcomes of cancer patients. Effective management of cancer cachexia demands a coordinated, multifaceted approach involving various healthcare disciplines and operational strategies. Streamlining care processes is crucial to ensure timely interventions and support, reducing delays in diagnosis and treatment initiation. Multidisciplinary collaboration is pivotal in creating integrated care plans that address the multifactorial nature of cancer cachexia comprehensively. Data-driven decision-making empowers healthcare teams to identify trends, monitor treatment responses, and tailor care plans to individual needs, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes. Standardized assessment and monitoring play a vital role in maintaining consistent, high-quality care, facilitating early interventions and treatment adjustments. Implementing patient-centered care fosters trust, enhances treatment adherence, and encourages patients to actively engage in their care journey, thereby improving their overall quality of life. This paper underscores the significance of applying operations management principles to optimize care delivery and enhance patient outcomes in the management of cancer cachexia. It provides valuable insights for healthcare institutions and professionals striving to provide comprehensive and effective care for individuals affected by this challenging condition.

Closing the cancer care gap with a patient-reported nutrition screening: A retrospective analysis of a quality improvement project on an oncology ward (CCC study)

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Early identification of patients at risk for malnutrition followed by individualized nutrition interventions is a central step to the provision of appropriate nutrition care. However, a health care professional (HCP)-based nutrition screening is not always consistently integrated into routine care. Patient-reported (PR) nutrition screening could thus potentially alleviate the burden on the HCPs and contribute to a greater number of patients who are identified and treated for malnutrition.

METHODS

In 2021 a Quality Improvement Project (QIP) at our out-patient oncology clinic was undertaken to implement the change from a HCP-based nutrition screening to a PR-screening. This was followed by a retrospective analysis in which the primary outcome measure was the rate of nutrition consultations initiated for patients undergoing cancer therapy.

RESULTS

In total n = 1657 patient data sets derived from comparable time periods before and after the QIP were analyzed and compared. Both groups had a comparable mean age and gender distribution. The most common diagnosis in both groups was gastrointestinal tumors. The change in routine care from a HCP-based nutrition screening to a PR-screening led to a significant increase in nutrition consultation rates (RD = 19%; p < 0.001; 95% CI 14.4%-23.5%) and screening rates (RD = 30.5%; p < 0.001; 95% CI 26.2%-34.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

The change to PR-screening potentially facilitates an increase in nutrition screening rates. This in turn leads to an increased rate of patients identified at risk for malnutrition and thus referrals for nutrition consultations. Our findings indicate that a PR nutrition screening tool could play a role in closing the care gap and contribute to reducing rates of malnutrition among this population where screening is not consistently integrated into routine care.