Whole-exome sequencing reveals mutational profiles of anorectal and gynecological melanoma

Real-World Evidence of the Prevalence of Driver Mutations in Anorectal Melanoma

INTRODUCTION

Anorectal melanoma is a rare neoplasm with an aggressive behavior and poor prognosis. Recently, recurrent gene mutations related to anorectal melanoma have been identified in a small series of cases, and this holds promise for targeted therapies, analogous to cutaneous melanoma. The purpose of this study was to analyze testing rates and prevalence of mutations in anorectal melanoma in the Dutch population.

METHODS

The Netherlands Cancer Registry and the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank were queried for all patients with a diagnosis of anorectal melanoma (2009-2019) and for whom a molecular analysis was performed. The genes that were tested and mutations that were reported were recorded. Mutation status was correlated with clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

In the period 2009-2019, 121 patients were diagnosed with anorectal melanoma. A molecular analysis was performed for 81 (67%) using single gene testing and various next-generation sequencing panels. Testing rates increased from 53% in 2009-2012 to 73% in 2016-2019. In 29/81 (36%) analyzed tumors, one or more mutations were reported: mutations in KIT (16/70, 23%), CTNNB1 (3/20, 15%), NRAS (6/60, 10%), BRAF non-V600E (4/74, 5%), GNAS (1/19, 5%), KRAS (1/28, 4%), BRAF V600E (1/74, 1%), and SF3B1 (1/1). In this cohort, a positive correlation was found between BRAF mutation status and age. Mutation status did not correlate with sex, date of diagnosis, tumor stage or surgical treatment. Survival was not influenced by any mutation status.

CONCLUSION

KIT was the most frequently mutated gene in the 81 analyzed anorectal melanomas in the period 2009-2019. With the increasing testing rates and use of next generation sequencing, the molecular landscape of anorectal melanomas is gradually being revealed. Adoption of broad mutation analysis will reveal potentially actionable targets for treatment of patients with anorectal melanoma.

Treatment outcomes of vulvar and vaginal melanoma at an NCCN institution between 1993 and 2021

Background

Vulvar melanoma and vaginal melanoma are rare and difficult to treat. We describe the last three decades in a cohort predominantly treated surgically with adjuvant therapy.

Methods

All new patients between 1993 and 2021 followed until 2024. Collection of demographic and oncologic data allowed comparisons and Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) stratified by adjuvant therapy type, diagnosis before and after 2011, and between vulvar and vaginal melanomas.

Results

Consultation for 63/72 patients (87.5 %) were for primary treatment. Most patients had vulvar melanoma (50/72, 69.4 %), received surgery (65/72, 90.3 %), and adjuvant treatment (40/72, 55.6 %) with immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and/or targeted therapy. Median survival for 63 patients presenting for primary treatment was 54.2 months, and 9/13 patients who were disease free after five years later received adjuvant immunotherapy. Survival did not vary by adjuvant therapy type or diagnosis after 2011 but was significantly less for vaginal melanoma. Following recurrence seven patients experienced complete response including three patients receiving combined nivolumab with ipilimumab and two nivolumab alone experienced.

Conclusions

Survival was not significantly different by adjuvant therapy type or after 2011. Most patients who were disease-free five years after surgery had received adjuvant therapy. Seven patients experienced complete responses to therapy after recurrence of whom five received immune checkpoint inhibitors. Although survival is not improved as in cutaneous melanomas by immune checkpoint inhibitors, signal continues for the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in gynecologic melanomas.

Innovations in Rare Gynecologic Cancer: Melanoma, Neuroendocrine, and Low-Grade Serous Ovarian

In the field of gynecologic cancer, low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) has been poorly understood and underinvestigated until recently. Similarly, understanding of the distinct properties and therapeutic sensitivities of gynecologic melanoma and cervical neuroendocrine tumors has recently accelerated. For each of these rare cancers, we explore the epidemiology and natural history, discuss the prognosis, diagnostic testing, and contemporary molecular classification, and then deliberate existing and emerging therapeutic strategies. In LGSOC, we focus on the clinical relevance of recent molecular studies that shed light on the importance of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway gene mutation and chromosome 1 copy-number change on prognosis and MEK inhibitor sensitivity. We also discuss the relative chemoresistance of this disease and the fact that attention is shifting to combinations of molecular therapies such as endocrine agents plus cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors or MEK inhibitors plus FAK inhibitors. Gynecologic tract melanomas harbor a lower frequency of canonical BRAF mutations, and have lower tumor mutational burden and immune cell infiltration than cutaneous melanomas (CMs). As a result, patients with this disease are less likely to respond to BRAF/MEK or immune checkpoint inhibition than patients with CM. Emerging strategies include the combination of antiangiogenic agents with immune checkpoint inhibitors and the use of adoptive cellular therapies. In cervical neuroendocrine cancer, we discuss the use of surgery in early-stage disease, and the uncertainties regarding the role of radiotherapy. We also explore the evidence for chemotherapy and emerging investigational strategies including the use of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. For all situations, we explore the shared decision-making process with the patient.

Novel JAG1 variants leading to Alagille syndrome in two Chinese cases

Alagille Syndrome (ALGS) is a complex genetic disorder characterized by cholestasis, congenital cardiac anomalies, and butterfly vertebrae. The variable phenotypic expression of ALGS can lead to challenges in accurately diagnosing affected infants, potentially resulting in misdiagnoses or underdiagnoses. This study highlights novel JAG1 gene mutations in two cases of ALGS. The first case with a novel p.Pro325Leufs*87 variant was diagnosed at 2 months of age and exhibited a favorable prognosis and an unexpected manifestation of congenital hypothyroidism. Before the age of 2, the second patient was incorrectly diagnosed with liver structural abnormalities, necessitating extensive treatment. In addition, he exhibited delays in language acquisition that may have been a result of SNAP25 haploinsufficiency. The identification of ALGS remains challenging, highlighting the importance of early detection and genetic testing for effective patient management. The variant p.Pro325Leufs*87 is distinct from reported variants linked to congenital hypothyroidism in ALGS patients, thereby further confirming the clinical and genetic complexity of ALGS. This emphasizes the critical need for individualized and innovative approaches to diagnosis and medical interventions, uniquely intended to address the complexity of this syndrome.