Endoscopic adenoidectomy with microdebrider

Comparison of classical, coblation, and combined adenoidectomy techniques in paediatric patients: a single-blind, prospective study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Adenoidectomy is one of the most commonly performed surgeries in pediatric otolaryngological practice. This prospective study compared three different adenoidectomy techniques' intra-operative and postoperative outcomes in pediatric patients. The techniques evaluated were classical (blind curettage), coblation, and a combined approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety pediatric patients undergoing adenoidectomy were enrolled in the study. The patients were divided into three groups based on the technique used: Group A, classical adenoidectomy (blind curettage); Group B, coblation adenoidectomy and Group C, combined (blind curettage + coblation) adenoidectomy. The intra-operative time, degree of bleeding, and complications during and after the operations were recorded.

RESULTS

Group A had a significantly shorter operative time than the other groups. However, there was no significant difference in the mean operative time between Groups B and C. The mean amount of intra-operative bleeding differed significantly among the groups. Group B had significantly less bleeding than Group A or Group C. The amount of bleeding also differed significantly between Groups A and C. The postoperative pain scores did not differ significantly among the groups. While complications were infrequent in all groups, Group C did not exhibit a higher complication rate than Groups A and B. The absence of residual or recurrent adenoid tissue in any of the groups during long-term follow-up examinations highlights the effectiveness of all three adenoidectomy techniques in preventing adenoid regrowth.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined approach, which was one of the techniques studied, demonstrated an intermediate profile in terms of operative time and intra-operative bleeding compared to the classical and coblation techniques. These findings suggest that this combined approach may be a feasible option for adenoidectomy in pediatric patients, considering its similar low incidence of postoperative complications.

Endoscopic Assisted Cold Steel adenoidectomy - A Cost Effective Modification for Better Outcome

Introduction

Adenoidectomy is most commonly performed in children to alleviate the symptoms pertaining to adenoid hypertrophy. The conventional cold steel method utilizing adenoid curette is the most commonly performed method in the world even after the invention of endoscopes & powered instruments like coblator & microdebrider due to the cost & time factors. The conventional method being a blind procedure, carries higher rate of recurrence due to remnant tissues. The visualization of the adenoid tissue in nasopharynx through the nasal endoscope helps in better engagement of adenoids into the curette & adequate tissue clearance with reduced recurrence of symptoms.

Aim

To study the effect of visualization of adenoid tissue for better tissue clearance in conventional adenoidectomy.

Objectives

To compare the duration of surgery, blood loss & recurrence rate following conventional cold steel adenoidectomy (CSA) & endoscope assisted cold steel adenoidectomy (EACSA).

Method

50 patients who underwent adenoidectomy with various indications were grouped into two groups with 25 patients each. Group A underwent (CSA)with or without tonsillectomy & Group B underwent (EACSA) with or without tonsillectomy were followed up for the duration of 3 months. The patients were evaluated for duration of surgery & post operatively for the recurrence at 3rd month of follow up.

Results

In our study, it was found that the tissue clearance in Group A was significantly low. The recurrence rate of 48% was observed in CSA group compared to 0% in group B with EACSA. The duration of surgery in both the procedures were comparable.

Conclusion

EACSA is an effective modification to CSA. It adds the benefits of endoscopic visualization of adenoid for the conventional curettage. The high recurrence rates of CA can be effectively reduced with no significant variation in duration of surgery.

Classification of reviews of e-healthcare services to improve patient satisfaction: Insights from an emerging economy

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought in many unique challenges and opportunities for patient care, and one is online healthcare practices. Patient satisfaction with online consultation is primary importance as online healthcare practices are evolving with time. Although previous research has examined how patient satisfaction with online doctor services can be further improved, there has been scant research on the satisfaction with online doctor services concerning Indian patients. Within the framework of service science theories, this study examines satisfaction and sentiments of Indian patients with online doctor services from multiple perspectives. A total of 38019 patient online feedback for 343 doctors was used for understanding patient sentiments. The sentiment analysis classified the reviews of the patients on online doctor consultation services. The finding suggests that healthcare service providers consider a systemic approach that includes core health services along with technical and marketing factors to proactively improve online patient satisfaction.

A Comparative Study of Endoscopic Assisted Powered Adenoidectomy Versus Conventional Adenoidectomy

Adenoidectomy is one of the most common procedures performed in children today, either alone or in conjunction with tonsillectomy or insertion of ventilating tubes. The present study was planned to compare the endoscopic powered adenoidectomy versus conventional adenoidectomy. The present prospective observational randomized study was carried out in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology of a tertiary care teaching hospital of Rajasthan. Fifty patients with adenoid hypertrophy in the age group between 5-13 years were enrolled in the study and divided in to two groups viz. cases undergoing conventional adenoidectomy using curettage method (group A = 25) and cases undergoing endoscopic powered adenoidectomy (group B = 25). Intra operative time, primary bleeding, completeness of adenoid removal, depth of resection, and collateral damage were noted intra operatively in both the groups. Postoperative pain, recovery time, postoperative complications were also compared. Intra operative time taken in Group A was 25.6 ± 2.90 min while it was 35.04 ± 5.24 min in Group B. (p < 0.0001) Average blood loss in Group A was 18.4 ± 4.72 ml compared to an average blood loss of 29.32 ± 2.59 ml in Group B. (p < 0.0001) The postoperative recovery time in Group A was 4.93 days and it was 3.06 days in group B. (p = 0.00). The present study concluded that newer method of endoscopic powered adenoidectomy was found to be a safe and useful tool for adenoidectomy in terms of completeness of resection, better control of depth of resection and minimal collateral damage intra-operatively and less postoperative pain, complications and fast recovery period.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-023-03633-4.

Microdebrider Assisted Resection of Suprastomal Lesions via Tracheostoma: A Novel Technique

Subglottic lesions are the commonest airway conditions leading to life threatening complications. Many conditions can present as subglottic lesions and can affect various age groups. There are various methods to manage these conditions described in the literature. We have devised a new method of managing these lesions by using a microdebrider inserted through the tracheal stoma. Here we describe three cases of subglottic lesions with pre-existing tracheostomy managed by this technique. The advantages and the post operative follow up of these patients are described. The follow up of the patients after 1 year showed significant improvement leading to their decannulation. Thus we would like to publish our results with scope of further research of this technique in this area and the treatment of such conditions affecting upper airway.

Endoscopic Adenoidectomy Replacing the Outdated Curette Adenoidectomy: Comparison of the Two Methods at a Tertiary Care Centre

To compare intraoperative and postoperative parameters of the two techniques of adenoidectomy, endoscope and microdebrider powered adenoidectomy and conventional adenoidectomy. Study Design Prospective study. Setting: Academic tertiary referral centre. In our study, cases of adenoid hypertrophy were randomly selected from the outpatient department of department of ORL & HNS. Out of these patients, 30 underwent Endoscopic adenoidectomy (EA) (Group A) and 30 underwent Conventional adenoidectomy (CA) (Group B). All of the patients were assessed pre-operatively, intra-operatively and post-operatively to compare the various parameters. The most common complaint in both the groups was mouth breathing with snoring. Intra-operative bleeding was 29.15 ml in group EA and 15.2 ml in group CA. Operative time for CA was shorter at 21.8 min as compared to 32.1 min for group EA. Residual adenoids and injury to adjacent structures were more common in group CA. Hospital stay was 3.2 days for EA patients and 3.43 days for CA patients. Resolution of symptoms was near comparable in both groups. Operative time and intra-operative bleeding are both significantly reduced with the CA as opposed to EA. However, injury to adjacent structures and residual adenoids occur significantly less in group EA. After weighing the risks and benefits, we can conclude that EA is comparatively better than CA.

Endoscopic Adenoidectomy with Microdebrider

To evaluate the role of microdebrider in patients undergoing endoscopic adenoidectomy. Prospective interventional study. Tertiary referral hospital. Twenty patients requiring adenoidectomy were included in the study. Mean operative time was found to be 31.5 min. Mean blood loss was 29.45 ml. All the patients had complete removal of adenoid mass. None of the patients had any kind of collateral damage. It gives a complete clearance of obstructive adenoids under vision thus providing reliable restoration of nasopharyngeal patency.

Comparison of Conventional Curettage Adenoidectomy Versus Endoscopic Powered Adenoidectomy: A Randomised Single-Blind Study

Globally adenoidectomy is increasingly being performed in isolation for children who have middle ear effusion or chronic otitis media, chronic rhinosinusitis and nasopharyngeal obstruction causing sleep apnoea and mouth breathing. Several techniques have been described lately including endoscopic powered adenoidectomy with debrider. The present study was undertaken to compare the effectiveness of endoscopic powered adenoidectomy (EA) with respect to conventional adenoidectomy (CA). It is a prospective study of 60 patients requiring adenoidectomy consisting of 33 males and 27 females randomized into group A with 30 patients undergoing conventional adenoidectomy with curette and 30 patients undergoing endoscopic powered adenoidectomy with micro-debrider. The demographic data (age, sex, adenoid hypertrophy grade assessed by Clemens and Mcmurray scale) in both groups were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). However, significant differences were observed in mean operative time of both groups (CA-29.12 ± 6.70, EA-37.80 ± 6.90 min, p < 0.05). The intra-operative blood volume loss was 21.30 ± 5.80 ml, 28.24 ± 6.93 ml in CA and EA respectively. No significant difference was seen in post-operative pain assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (p-0.39). Complete removal of adenoids was seen in 83.3% cases with EA versus 53.3% with CA (p < 0.05). The residual adenoids noted after the CA and EA in Grade I was 23.3% and 13.3% respectively while in CA, grade II with 16.7% and grade III with 6.7% cases had residual adenoids. Injury to surrounding structure was seen in 16.7% and 10% of CA and EA respectively. However, no difference in complication rate was observed between the study groups (p > 0.05). We conclude that endoscopic powered adenoidectomy is more complete, accurate, with less post-operative pain and lower incidence of recurrence in comparison with conventional adenoidectomy.

Trans-oral endoscopic assisted radio-frequency for adenoid ablation; A randomized prospective comparative clinical study

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the efficacy and safety of conventional adenoidectomy using a curette and the Radio-frequency (RF) adenoid ablation using endoscope via the trans-oral technique.

METHODS

A randomized prospective comparative study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital. The study included 80 patients with a diagnosis of adenoid hypertrophy, which was confirmed by X-ray of a lateral view of the skull. The patients were submitted into two groups 40 for each: curettage group and Radiofrequency group. Patients with bleeding diathesis, congenital anomalies, previous adenoidectomy, and morbid illness were excluded from the study. We evaluated the time consumption, the adenoid tissue remnant by the endoscope, blood loss, and clinical correlations like pain by Visual Analog Scale, halitosis, and secondary bleeding in both study groups.

RESULTS

Intra-operative blood loss was 20-40 ml in the Radio-frequency (RF) group, but in the curettage group was 36 - 55 ml. Post-operative pain in the (RF) group was lower than the curettage group. Secondary bleeding was reported mostly in the curettage group (15%). The duration of the operation in (RF) group was relatively long. Halitosis decreased mainly after curettage adenoidectomy.

CONCLUSION

The endoscopic radio-frequency adenoid ablation surpassed the conventional method. We encourage using Radio-frequency in adenoid surgery as a replacement for the traditional method.

Comparison of middle ear function and hearing thresholds in children with adenoid hypertrophy after microdebrider and conventional adenoidectomy: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Microdebrider has superior efficacy in clearing the adenoids, compared to curettage. We compared the improvement in middle ear function and hearing thresholds after adenoidectomy, by both methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

126 patients (median age-9 years) were randomized into groups A and B, where adenoidectomy was done by microdebrider and curettage, respectively. Middle ear function parameters and hearing thresholds were measured serially.

RESULTS

The mean improvement in middle ear pressure, compliance and hearing thresholds were 92.5 ± 67.6 and 84.2 ± 71.4 daPa; (p = 0.40), 0.19 ± 0.34 and 0.27 ± 0.27 mL; (p = 0.07) and 3.20 ± 4.95 and 2.54 ± 3.98 dB; (p = 0.27), in groups A and B, respectively. Reversal of type B tympanograms was noted in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Middle ear function and hearing thresholds improved in both groups after adenoidectomy. More improvement was noted in the microdebrider group, which, however, was not significant.

Comparison of Endoscope-Assisted Coblation Adenoidectomy to Conventional Curettage Adenoidectomy in Terms of Postoperative Eustachian Tube Function

INTRODUCTION

Adenoidectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures performed in children in otorhinolaryngology practice. This study aims to compare the conventional curettage adenoidectomy (CCA) and the endoscope-assisted coblation adenoidectomy (EACA) in terms of the postoperative Eustachian tube function and the surgical outcomes.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, controlled study was carried out at a tertiary referral center and private hospital. Seventy-two adenoid hypertrophy patients without middle ear disease were randomly assigned to 2 groups to be operated via CCA and EACA techniques prior to surgery. Parameters including middle ear pressure values (MEPV), operative time, intraoperative hemorrhage, postoperative residual adenoid tissue, and postoperative pain were compared between groups.

RESULTS

In the CCA group for both ears, there was a statistically significant difference between preoperative mean MEPV and mean MEPV of postoperative day 1, while MEPV returned to normal ranges at the postoperative day 7. No statistically significant differences were observed in mean MEPV on preoperatively and 1st and 7th postoperative days in the EACA group for both right and left ears. Mean operative time was significantly higher in the EACA group compared to the CCA group (P < 0.001). Eight (22.2%) out of 36 patients who underwent CCA had a residual adenoid tissue postoperatively, while there was no residual adenoid tissue in any patients who operated via the EACA technique. Mean pain score on postoperative day 1 and 2 and blood loss were significantly less in the EACA group than the CCA group.

CONCLUSION

Endoscope-assisted coblation adenoidectomy may serve a reasonable alternative to conventional curettage adenoidectomy because it provides Eustachian tube functions preserved, decreased intraoperative hemorrhage, complete resection of the adenoid tissue, and lower pain score.

Endoscopic assisted powered adenoidectomy versus conventional adenoidectomy – a randomised controlled trial

Objective

To compare endoscopic assisted powered adenoidectomy with conventional curettage adenoidectomy.

Methods

A randomised controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary care teaching hospital. Fifty patients with a symptom complex pertaining to adenoid hypertrophy and requiring adenoidectomy were chosen and divided into 2 groups of 25 each. Patients in group A underwent conventional curettage adenoidectomy and those in group B underwent endoscopic assisted powered adenoidectomy. Comparison was based on the parameters of surgical time, intra-operative bleeding, post-operative pain and completeness of adenoid removal.

Results

The surgical time was significantly longer with the powered instrument. Mean blood loss was greater in the powered group, but was statistically insignificant. The powered procedure fared significantly better, with lower pain scores and more instances of complete tissue resection.

Conclusion

A curved microdebrider blade can be used safely and precisely for adenoidectomy under endoscopic vision. It enables complete resection of adenoid tissue. This method also proves to be an excellent teaching aid.

Curettage adenoidectomy versus endoscopic microdebrider adenoidectomy in children: A randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Adenoidectomy is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures with different techniques and technologies. Although curettage adenoidectomy (CA) has been practiced conventionally for many years, endoscopic microdebrider adenoidectomy (EMA) has emerged as an innovative surgical method. Comparing physiological effects, efficacy and safety of the endoscopic microdebrider adenoidectomy (EMA) and curettage adenoidectomy (CA) in pediatric population is aimed with this prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial.

METHODS

Sixty pediatric patients with type-A tympanogram according to Jerger classification in both ears before surgery were randomly assigned to receive the CA (n = 30) and the EMA (n = 30). Tympanometry evaluation for each ear was performed the day before surgery firstly and was repeated on days 1, 7 and 14 after surgery. Intraoperative time, complications during and after the operation were recorded. Postoperative pain was also evaluated for 10 days postoperatively.

RESULTS

Tympanometric evaluation revealed significantly reduced middle ear peak pressure levels with the EMA than with the CA for each ear on day 1 after surgery and for only left ear on day 7 after surgery (P < 0.05). In addition, statistically significant reduced pain scores in postoperative first 3 days were related to the EMA (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the methods in terms of duration of surgery and complications.

CONCLUSION

According to findings from this study, the EMA procedure may be as safe and rapid as the CA. Furthermore, the EMA may be more controlled and less invasive to the surrounding tissues. Further studies are advised to support these data.

Comparison of three different adenoidectomy techniques in children - has the conventional technique been surpassed?

INTRODUCTION

Pharyngeal tonsil hyperplasia is the most frequent cause of nasal obstruction and chronic mouth breathing during childhood. Adenoidectomy is the procedure of choice for the resolution of these symptoms. It is not yet known, however, whether the conventional technique ("blind curettage") has been surpassed by more modern adenoidectomy techniques (video-assisted, with the aid of instruments). This study aimed to compare the conventional adenoidectomy technique with two other emerging techniques, performed in a reference otorhinolaryngology center.

METHODS

This is a prospective and observational study of 33 children submitted to adenoidectomy using 3 different techniques that were followed up for a period of 3 months after surgery. The patients were divided into 3 different groups, according to the adenoidectomy technique: Group A (conventional technique - "blind curettage"); Group B (video-assisted adenoidectomy with microdebrider); Group C (video-assisted adenoidectomy with radiofrequency - Coblation^®). The surgical time of each procedure was measured, being considered from the moment of insertion of the mouth gag until complete hemostasis was achieved. The questionnaire for quality of life OSA-18 was applied to all caregivers on the day of the surgery and 30-90 days after the procedure. Postoperative complications were also analyzed.

RESULTS

For the entire patient sample, there was an improvement in quality of life after the surgery (p < 0.05). When analyzing the evolution of OSA-18 index, all groups showed statistically significant improvement, for all assessed domains. There were no statistically significant differences between the 3 techniques assessed for quality of life improvement after the surgery (p > 0.05). Regarding the duration of the procedure, the conventional technique showed the shortest surgical time when compared to the others (p < 0.05). No postoperative complications were noted, for any patient.

CONCLUSIONS

The adenoidectomy resulted in improvement of quality of life, and there were no major postoperative complications, for all operated children, regardless of the technique used. The conventional technique was faster when compared to the more modern adenoidectomy techniques.

Combined Conventional and Endoscopic Microdebrider-Assisted Adenoidectomy: A Tertiary Centre Experience

INTRODUCTION

Adenoidectomy is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures in children. Conventional adenoidectomy is associated with incomplete adenoid tissue removal with persistence of symptoms. The advent of rigid nasal endoscopes, cold light source, fiber optics and powered instruments used in functional endoscopic sinus surgery helped in the development of endoscopic microdebrider-assisted adenoidectomy.

AIM

To establish the safety and efficacy of combined conventional and endoscopic microdebrider-assisted adenoidectomy procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a prospective study of 60 child patients who underwent combined conventional and endoscopic microdebrider-assisted adenoidectomy. The study was conducted from September 2013 to September 2015. Only child patients with grade 3 and grade 4 Adenoid Hypertrophy (AH) was included in the study. At the end of conventional adenoidectomy and after combined procedure, the AH was graded again. Post-operative complications like neck pain, hypernasality and swallowing problems were noted. Their symptom score was reviewed before surgery and after one month and one year of surgery. The duration of surgery and amount of blood loss was recorded.

RESULTS

By this technique, complete clearance of adenoid tissue was obtained in all 60 (100%) cases. The mean pre-operative symptom score for AH was 3.7, which improved to 0 after one month of combined conventional and endoscopic microdebrider-assisted adenoidectomy. All child patients were symptom-free at the end of one month and one year. The duration of conventional adenoidectomy was 5 minutes 12 seconds while total duration of the combined conventional and endoscopic microdebrider-assisted adenoidectomy was 14 minutes 45 seconds. There was no significant blood loss (15±3 ml approximately). There were no major complications in this study.

CONCLUSION

The combined approach of conventional curette along with endoscopic microdebrider-assisted adenoidectomy is a safe and effective method for complete and accurate removal of large adenoids.

Endoscopic assisted adenoidectomy versus conventional curettage adenoidectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Adenoidectomy, surgical removal of hypertrophic adenoids, is a common operation in children worldwide. The purpose of this study was to compare the operative effectiveness, and included total operative time, blood loss and complications, between endoscopic assisted adenoidectomy and conventional curettage adenoidectomy. EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure and symposiums and review articles were used to choose relevant randomized controlled trials. A meta-analysis was performed to analyze the data for total operative time, blood loss and complications. Seven studies fit the inclusion criteria, and included 331 patients treated with endoscopic assisted adenoidectomy, and 251 patients treated with conventional curettage adenoidectomy. The meta-analysis demonstrated that compared with conventional curettage adenoidectomy, endoscopic assisted adenoidectomy had a shorter operative time (SMD −1.09; 95 % CI −1.29 to −0.90; p < 0.00001), less blood loss (MD −19.74; 95 % CI −22.75 to −16.73; p < 0.00001), and fewer complications (OR 0.15; 95 % CI 0.07–0.35; p < 0.0001). Endoscopic assisted adenoidectomy has advantages over conventional curettage adenoidectomy with regard to total operative time, blood loss and complications.

Audiological Outcome of Classical Adenoidectomy versus Endoscopically-Assisted Adenoidectomy using a Microdebrider

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate audiological outcomes following adenoidectomy by the classical method and by endoscopically-assisted adenoidectomy using a powered instrument (microdebrider).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted in a tertiary care center. It included 40 patients divided into two equal groups of 20 each. Group-A patients underwent classical adenoidectomy, while Group-B patients were subjected to endoscopically-assisted adenoidectomy using a microdebrider. Hearing outcome was measured by post-operative pure-tone audiometry and tympanometry.

RESULTS

The post-operative average air-bone gap (ABG) was reduced from 19.6 dB to 11.8 dB in Group A and from 17.6 dB to 8.7 dB in Group B (P=0.010). There was reversal of tympanometric curves from type-B and type-C to type-A in 55% of the patients in Group A, while type-A curve was seen in 90% cases in Group B in the post-operative period.

CONCLUSION

Audiological outcomes of endoscopically-assisted adenoidectomy using a microdebrider were superior compared with classical adenoidectomy.

Changing Trends in Adenoidectomy

Adenoid hypertrophy treatment is must to alleviate chronic nasal obstruction, mouth breathing, rhinosinusitis and eustachian tube dysfunction. For proper management of this clinical entity a thorough clinical examination along with radiological and endoscopic evaluation is mandatory. Although, few children having adenoid hypertrophy respond to medical treatment, surgery remains the mainstay. An adenoidectomy can be performed by variety of techniques. Conventional adenoidectomy is by the curettage method, still practiced in many institutions, though, a recent technique of endoscopic assisted adenoidectomy by microdebrider is also getting popularized. Both the techniques have their own merits and demerits. However, which of the two surgical techniques is better, is still a matter of preference and experience of the surgeon with the technique. In the present study we will compare the conventional curettage adenoidectomy with endoscopically assisted adenoidectomy done with microdebrider in 40 pediatric patients of adenoid hypertrophy.

Postadenoidectomy hemorrhage: how we do it?

AIMS

Conventionally, adenoidectomy has been performed using blind curettage. Postoperative hemorrhage is the most common complication of surgery. There is no specific management algorithm in the literature. In this study, we described an endoscopic approach in the management of postadenoidectomy hemorrhage.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 1995 and 2014, 7946 patients undergoing adenoidectomy under general anesthesia in our clinic were retrospectively analyzed. All patients had a rest adenoid tissue located in the choanae. Endoscopic excision of the tissue was performed without using a post-nasal pack.

RESULTS

All patients (100%) had a rest adenoid tissue located in the choanae. Hemorrhage was completely discontinued with endoscopic excision of the hemorrhagic tissue.

CONCLUSION

Based on our study findings, we conclude that an endoscopic approach should be applied in all postoperative patients with hemorrhage who are unresponsive to conservative treatment modalities.

Powered instrumentation for transnasal endoscopic partial adenoidectomy in children with submucosal cleft palate

OBJECTIVES

Partial adenoidectomy is the selective removal of the obstructing part of adenoid tissue, thus relieves obstruction symptoms and preserves the velopharyngeal valve action. Patients with palatal dysfunction are candidates for the technique. This study describes the use of microdebrider, transnasally (guided by the nasal endoscope) to perform partial adenoidectomy in patients with submucosal cleft palate, who presented with adenoidal hypertrophy and also it discusses its effects on nasal obstruction and speech.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This prospective study was carried out on twenty-three submucosal cleft palate patients who were referred to the ORL-HN department; Zagazig University Hospitals complaining of respiratory obstruction and sleep disturbances due to adenoids hypertrophy. After preoperative nasoendoscopic and speech evaluation, transnasal endoscopic, power-assisted partial adenoidectomy was done for all patients. All patients were followed up at regular visits including nasoendoscopy and speech evaluation.

RESULTS

The procedure insured fast, safe, reliable, under vision and well controlled steps. Intraoperatively no major complications were recorded. During follow up, nasal obstruction and respiratory obstruction symptoms were improved. Speech outcome results were reported.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrates the feasibility of using the microdebrider for performing transnasal partial adenoidectomy (under endoscopic guidance). The procedure is precise, rapid, safe and well-tolerated with the advantage of direct visualization of a traditionally difficult-to-expose area. The study reported improvement of respiratory obstruction symptoms with good speech results.