Incidence of venous thromboembolic events in cancer patients receiving immunotherapy: a single-institution experience

Thromboembolism during immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: frequency and risk factors

BACKGROUND

Thromboembolism (TE) is a well-known complication during chemotherapy in cancer patients. However, the risk of TE associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is unknown. This study was performed to investigate the incidence of TE and associated risk factors in patients treated with ICIs.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart survey of patients receiving at least one ICI at Shinshu University Hospital between September 2014 and October 2021. Age, sex, cancer type, body mass index, medical history, laboratory data at commencement of treatment, and medication data were obtained from electronic medical records. TE events (venous thromboembolism [VTE], arterial thromboembolism [ATE]) were identified after ICI initiation.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 548 patients with a median age of 70.0 (19-89) years, 71.4% men, and a median follow-up of 15.1 months (range; 0.16-72.0 months). Nivolumab was the most commonly used ICI (45.8%), followed by pembrolizumab (23.9%), pembrolizumab plus anticancer drugs (7.8%), and nivolumab plus ipilimumab (5.1%). Thirty-eight cases of TE (6.9%) occurred (22 VTE, 16 ATE). Risk factors significantly associated with TE in multivariate logistic analysis were dyslipidemia (OR 2.44; 95% CI 1.17-5.09; p = 0.017), Khorana score ≥ 2 (HR 2.40; 95% CI 1.14-5.04; p = 0.021). Overall survival was not significantly different from patients without TE (p = 0.963).

CONCLUSION

These results suggested that the frequency of TE is higher than expected and should be considered and monitored in patients treated with ICIs.

Venous and Arterial Thromboembolism in Lung Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Analysis

Background: Patients with lung cancer face an increased incidence of venous (VTE) and arterial (ATE) thromboembolism. Risk factors for thrombosis remain unclear, particularly the impact of the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We sought to compare the incidence of VTE and ATE in lung cancer patients receiving platinum-based therapy versus those receiving ICIs alone or in combination with chemotherapy and to validate the Khorana risk score for predicting VTE in the era of ICIs. Methods: A retrospective single-institution data analysis of 173 patients diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic lung cancer at the Jena University hospital between 2015 and 2021. Results: The study revealed a high incidence of VTE (17.9%) and ATE (5.8%). The VTE risk was higher in patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.09-0.93) than in patients with other histological types. A prior venous event was associated with an increased risk of recurrent VTE (OR 4.46, 95% CI 1.20-16.63). The incidence of thrombosis under first-line platinum-based chemotherapy did not differ from the incidence under ICIs (p = 0.19). There were no differences in the subgroup of patients who received ICIs alone or combined immunochemotherapy (p = 0.43). The Khorana score failed to predict the risk of VTE correctly. Conclusions: We did not find evidence supporting the theory that ICI therapy (alone or combined) increases the risk of thrombotic events. Adenocarcinoma and a prior history of VTE were strongly associated with an increased risk of VTE. Other scores for thrombotic risk assessment in lung cancer patients should be tested in prospective studies.

Incidence of thromboembolic events in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

ABSTRACT

The incidence of thromboembolic events (TEs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has rarely been reported. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched. The primary outcome was the incidence of TEs, and the secondary outcome was the relationship between TEs and overall survival (OS) following ICI therapy. A subgroup analysis of TE incidents was performed according to the TE type and combination regimens. The I2 statistic was used to determine the heterogeneity, and funnel plots and Egger's test were used to assess publication bias. A total of 16,602 patients with NSCLC in 63 experimental arms were included in the analysis. The rate of TEs ranged from 0.1% to 13.8%, and the pooled overall incidence of all-grade TEs was 3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2%-4%). The pooled rate of high-grade TEs was 1% (95% CI, 1%-2%). The venous and arterial TE rates were 3% (95% CI, 2%-4%) and 1% (95% CI, 1%-2%), respectively. Patients who received immunotherapy + chemoradiotherapy had the highest incidence of TEs (7%). The TE pooled rate was higher in patients treated with combined ICIs than in those treated with mono ICIs (4% vs. 2%). The OS was lower in patients with TEs than in those without TEs (hazard ratio, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.02%-1.92%). The incidence of TEs in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs was reasonable. Nonetheless, clinicians must be aware of potential thrombotic complications and treat them promptly.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated thrombosis in patients with bladder and kidney cancer: a study of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) thrombosis and cancer group

PURPOSE

Both venous and arterial thrombotic events (VTE/AT) can be associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). However, there is a paucity of information apropos patients in routine clinical practice.

METHODS/PATIENTS

Retrospective, multicenter study promoted by the Thrombosis and Cancer Section of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM). Individuals with kidney or bladder cancer who initiated ICI between 01/01/2015 and 12/31/2020 were recruited. Minimum follow-up was 6 months (except in cases of demise). The primary objective was to calculate the incidence of ICI-associated VTE/AT and secondary objectives included to analyze their impact on survival and identify variables predictive of VTE/AT.

RESULTS

210 patients with kidney cancer were enrolled. The incidence of VTE/AT during follow-up (median 13 months) was 5.7%. Median overall survival (OS) was relatively lower among subjects with VTE/AT (16 months, 95% CI 0.01-34.2 vs. 27 months, 95% CI 22.6-31.4; p = 0.43). Multivariate analysis failed to reveal predictive variables for developing VTE/ AT. 197 patients with bladder were enrolled. There was a 9.1% incidence rate of VTE/AT during follow-up (median 8 months). Median OS was somewhat higher in patients with VTE/AT (28 months, 95% CI 18.4-37.6 vs 25 months, 95% CI 20.7-29.3; p = 0.821). Serum albumin levels < 3.5 g/dl were predictive of VTE/ AT (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

There appears to be no association between developing VTE/AT and ICI use in patients with renal or bladder cancer. Serum albumin levels are a predictive factor in individuals with bladder cancer.

Associations Between Immune-Related Venous Thromboembolism and Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This study aims to summarize the available data and determine if the presence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) immune-related adverse event (irAE) in patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is associated with improved treatment efficacy and clinical outcomes, which in turn was used to help optimize patient selection for anticoagulation therapy and inform rational treatment strategies for overcoming the mechanisms of ICI resistance. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched up to March 18, 2023, for studies assessing the relationship between VTE irAE development during ICI therapy and cancer outcomes. Seven primary articles with a total of 4437 patients were included in the overall survival (OS) meta-analysis. Patients with VTE had a significant increase in overall mortality compared to patients without VTE in adjusted hazard ratios (HRs 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.75, P  =  .02). In the studies where immortal time bias (ITB) was accounted for, patients with VTE irAE also had poor OS than those without. HR and the corresponding 95% CI values in the non-ITB group were 2.53 (1.75-3.66, P < .00001) with low heterogeneity (P  =  .17, I2  =  48%) and 1.21 (1.06-1.37, P  =  .004) in the ITB group with no heterogeneity (P  =  .95, I2  =  0%), respectively. Despite the heterogeneity identified, the evidence does suggest that VTE irAE occurrence could be served as a prognostic indicator, with higher frequencies of occurrence associated with poorer OS. However, the fundamental role of this association with clinical consequences should be further investigated in large cohorts and clinical trials.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors-associated thrombosis in patients with lung cancer and melanoma: a study of the Spanish society of medical oncology (SEOM) thrombosis and cancer group

Purpose

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) can be associated with thrombotic events, both venous and arterial (VTE/AT). However, there is a paucity of information regarding patients in routine clinical practice.

Methods/patients

Retrospective, multicenter study promoted by the Thrombosis and Cancer Section of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM). Patients with melanoma and lung cancer who initiated ICI between 01/01/2015 and 31/12/2019 were recruited. Minimum follow-up was 6 months (unless it was not possible because of death). The primary objective was to calculate the incidence of ICI-associated VTE/AT and the secondary objectives included to analyze its impact on survival and to identify predictor variables for VTE/AT.

Results

665 patients with lung cancer were enrolled. The incidence of VTE/AT during follow-up was 8.4%. Median overall survival (OS) was lower in the VTE/AT group (12 months 95% CI 4.84–19.16 vs. 19 months 95% CI 16.11–21.9; p = 0.0049). Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and anemia upon initiation of IT, as well as a history of thrombosis between cancer diagnosis and the start of ICI, were predictive variables for developing of VTE/AT (p < 0.05). 291 patients with melanoma were enrolled. There was a 5.8% incidence rate of VTE/AT during follow-up. Median OS was lower in the VTE/AT group (10 months 95% CI 0.0–20.27 vs. 29 months 95% CI 19.58–36.42; p = 0.034). NLR and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) at the beginning of ICI were predictor variables for VTE/AT (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

ICI increases the risk of VTE/AT in patients with lung cancer and melanoma, which impact OS.

Hemostasis and tumor immunity

Significant data have accumulated demonstrating a reciprocal relationship between cancer and the hemostatic system whereby cancer promotes life‐threatening hemostatic system dysregulation (e.g., thromboembolism, consumptive coagulopathy), and hemostatic system components directly contribute to cancer pathogenesis. The mechanistic underpinnings of this relationship continue to be defined, but it is becoming increasingly clear that many of these mechanisms involve crosstalk between the hemostatic and immune systems. This is perhaps not surprising given that there is ample evidence for bidirectional crosstalk between the hemostatic and immune systems at multiple levels that likely evolved to coordinate the response to injury, host defense, and tissue repair. Much of the data linking hemostasis and immunity in cancer biology focus on innate immune system components. However, the advent of adaptive immunity‐based cancer therapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors has revealed that the relationship of hemostasis and immunity in cancer extends to the adaptive immune system. Adaptive immunity‐based cancer therapies appear to be associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic complications, and hemostatic system components appear to regulate adaptive immune functions through diverse mechanisms to affect tumor progression. In this review, the evidence for crosstalk between hemostatic and adaptive immune system components is discussed, and the implications of this relationship in the context of cancer therapy are reviewed. A better understanding of these relationships will likely lead to strategies to make existing adaptive immune based therapies safer by decreasing thromboembolic risk and may also lead to novel targets to improve adaptive immune‐based cancer treatments.

Old is new again: emergence of thromboembolic complications in cancer patients on immunotherapy

Cancer immunotherapy has emerged as one of the most important new treatments for cancer in many years, moving rapidly to front-line therapy for several cancers. Cancer immunotherapy is based on treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), which are monoclonal antibodies directed toward immunoregulatory proteins including PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4. ICI inhibit interactions between these proteins and their ligands, disabling physiologic immune regulatory networks and enhancing anti-tumor immunity. However, since the immune response cannot be directed specifically to the tumor, ICI are associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) resulting from immune-mediated attack of normal tissues. We and others have reported a high incidence of thrombosis in patients treated with ICI, which may approach 20%. Given the rapidly increasing use of ICIs, it is clear that ICI-Associated Thrombosis (IAT) is a major emerging clinical problem. However, there is a remarkable knowledge gap concerning mechanisms of IAT. IAT may be a composite irAE resulting from activation of blood and vascular cells, leading to thromboinflammation. Cancer itself is an inflammatory disorder, and inducing further inflammation through ICI administration may stimulate procoagulant activity by multiple cell types. Moreover, some blood and vascular cells express ICI target proteins. Here, we review the results of several studies describing the clinical manifestations of IAT, as well as our recent studies demonstrating that elevated levels of myeloid derived suppressor cells and inflammatory cytokines may serve as biomarkers of IAT. It is hoped that the concepts reviewed here may stimulate further research into this important clinical problem.

Assessing the risk of thromboembolism in cancer patients receiving immunotherapy

Malignancy has long been implicated with hypercoagulability, leading to an increased rate of both venous and arterial thromboembolic events (VTE and ATE). Immunotherapy has established itself as a cornerstone of modern cancer therapy by promoting antitumor immune responses, though there have been some suggestions that immune-related adverse events could include increased rates of VTE and ATE. In this review, we examine the available evidence regarding the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and thrombosis. First, we describe the potential mechanisms by which ICIs might lead to thrombophilia given the overlap between the immune system, coagulation cascade, and platelet adhesion and activation. In addition, while there are some preclinical data evaluating immunotherapy-associated ATEs in animal models, there is a paucity of evidence exploring potential mechanism of VTEs in ICIs. Second, we review the incidence of ATE and VTE in patients receiving ICIs in the published literature. Finally, we discuss current limitations in understanding, areas of conflicting evidence, and approaches to further investigation.

Exploring the Mechanisms Underlying the Cardiotoxic Effects of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapies

Adaptive immune response modulation has taken a central position in cancer therapy in recent decades. Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is now indicated in many cancer types with exceptional results. The two major inhibitory pathways involved are cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1). Unfortunately, immune activation is not tumor-specific, and as a result, most patients will experience some form of adverse reaction. Most immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) involve the skin and gastrointestinal (GI) tract; however, any organ can be involved. Cardiotoxicity ranges from arrhythmias to life-threatening myocarditis with very high mortality rates. To date, most treatments of ICI cardiotoxicity include immune suppression, which is also not cardiac-specific and may result in hampering of tumor clearance. Understanding the mechanisms behind immune activation in the heart is crucial for the development of specific treatments. Histological data and other models have shown mainly CD4 and CD8 infiltration during ICI-induced cardiotoxicity. Inhibition of CTLA4 seems to result in the proliferation of more diverse T0cell populations, some of which with autoantigen recognition. Inhibition of PD-1 interaction with PD ligand 1/2 (PD-L1/PD-L2) results in release from inhibition of exhausted self-recognizing T cells. However, CTLA4, PD-1, and their ligands are expressed on a wide range of cells, indicating a much more intricate mechanism. This is further complicated by the identification of multiple co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory signals, as well as the association of myocarditis with antibody-driven myasthenia gravis and myositis IRAEs. In this review, we focus on the recent advances in unraveling the complexity of the mechanisms driving ICI cardiotoxicity and discuss novel therapeutic strategies for directly targeting specific underlying mechanisms to reduce IRAEs and improve outcomes.

Thirty-day mortality rates after immunotherapy initiation

Background: The aim of this study was to determine the cause of death in patients who died within 30 days after the first dose of immunotherapy. Methods: The data of 1432 patients treated with immunotherapy in six tertiary referral hospitals were retrospectively analyzed. Results: It was determined that 34 (2%) of the patients died within 30 days after the first dose of immunotherapy. Death occurred in all patients who received palliative therapy, and most patients (88%) received immunotherapy as second- or subsequent-line of therapy. The most common cause of death was disease progression and thromboembolic events. Conclusion: Preliminary results of the current study might give some clues to define the patient population in whom the fatal side effects of immunotherapy might be encountered.

Risk Factors, Incidence, and Prognosis of Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the standard treatment option for tumors. With the widespread application of ICIs, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have gradually attracted the attention of researchers. Owing to the characteristics of ICIs, irAEs can affect each organ of the human body. Thromboembolism is uncommon in cancer patients receiving ICIs, but it may affect their survival. Most thromboembolic events do not cause serious effects after early prediction and treatment, but life-threatening toxic reactions are also observed. This condition should not be ignored because of vague and atypical symptoms, which make early diagnosis more challenging. This article focuses on the high-risk factors, underlying mechanisms, incidence, and prognosis of thromboembolism in patients using ICIs and briefly describes the intervention and treatment measures. This information would allow patients to effectively manage the side effects of thromboembolism during Immune checkpoint inhibitors treatment, ensuring the efficacy of ICIs and reducing mortality.

Venous thromboembolism events in patients with advanced cancer on immune checkpoint inhibitors

Aim: To evaluate the correlation between venous thromboembolism events (VTEs) and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based regimens. Methods: This is a retrospective study of 403 patients with advanced cancer on ICI-based regimens. Results: We report 8% VTE incidence post-ICI initiation over a median of 11.1 months of follow-up. Compared with single-agent ICI, dual-ICI was significantly correlated with higher incidence of VTE (odds ratio [OR]: 4.196, 95% CI: 1.527-11.529, p = 0.005), but chemotherapy-immuno-oncology combination was not (OR: 1.374, 95% CI: 0.285-6.632, p = 0.693). Subsequent systemic therapy post-ICI was also independently associated with higher VTE incidence (OR: 2.599, 95% CI: 1.169-5.777, p = 0.019). Conclusion: Our findings suggest potential underreporting of VTE incidence in ICI clinical trials. As dual-ICI is becoming more prevalent in cancer management, clinicians should maintain vigilance regarding VTE in patients with advanced cancer on ICI-based regimens.

Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Inhibitors Is Associated with Improved Overall Response and Progression-Free Survival in Patients with Metastatic Malignant Melanoma Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors-A Retrospective, Real-World Cohort Study

Simple Summary

The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) improved the prognosis for patients with advanced melanoma. However, many patients do not benefit from ICI therapy due to primary and acquired resistance. Observations in murine systems suggested that coagulation factor Xa impedes anti-tumor immunity and that the oral FXa-inhibitor (FXa-i) rivaroxaban might synergize with ICI. In this retrospective study, we could demonstrate that concomitant treatment with anticoagulants did not impact the objective response rate, progression-free survival, or overall survival of stage IV melanoma patients who were treated with ICI. Remarkably, however, patients receiving concomitant treatment with FXa-i during initial ICI therapy showed a significantly improved objective response rate and progression-free survival as compared to patients not receiving anticoagulation or patients treated with other anticoagulants, such as heparins or vitamin K antagonists. Hence, our data suggest that FXa-i may augment ICI therapy, while patients who received FXa-i were not more likely to encounter bleeding complications.

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) significantly improved the prognosis of advanced melanoma patients. However, many patients do not derive long-term benefit from ICI therapy due to primary and acquired resistance. In this regard, it has been shown that coagulation factors contribute to cancer immune evasion and might therefore promote resistance to ICI. In particular, recent observations in murine systems demonstrated that myeloid-derived factor Xa (FXa) impedes anti-tumor immunity in the tumor microenvironment and that the oral FXa inhibitor (FXa-i) rivaroxaban synergizes with ICI. The synergistic effect of FXa inhibitors with clinical ICI therapy is unknown. We performed a retrospective study of 280 metastatic melanoma patients who were treated with ICI and stratified them for concomitant anticoagulation (AC) by medical chart review. Data on baseline patient characteristics, specific AC treatment, ICI therapy, other tumor-targeting therapies, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Of 280 patients who received ICI, 76 received concomitant AC during initial ICI therapy. Patients on AC were treated either with heparins (n = 29), vitamin K antagonists (VKA) (n = 20), or FXa-i (n = 27). Patients requiring AC during ICI therapy showed no significantly reduced objective response rate (ORR) (p = 0.27), or progression-free (PFS; median PFS 4 vs. 4 months; p = 0.71) or overall survival (OS; median OS: 39 vs. 51 months; p = 0.31). Furthermore, patients who underwent AC did not show significantly more bleeding complications (p = 0.605) than those who were not anticoagulated. Remarkably, stratification of patients by the class of AC revealed that patients receiving FXa-i were more likely to obtain CR (26.9 vs. 12.6%, p = 0.037), and showed better ORR (69.2 vs. 36.4%, p = 0.005), PFS (median PFS: 12 months vs. 3 months; p = 0.006), and OS (median OS not reached vs. 42 months; p = 0.09) compared to patients not receiving FXa-i. Patient demographics and tumor characteristics in this patient subcohort did not significantly differ from patients not on FXa-i. In summary, our study provides first clinical evidence that the clinical application of FXa-i may enhance the efficacy of ICI therapy via the restoration of anti-tumor immunity, while patients who received FXa-i were not more likely to encounter bleeding complications.

Cardiovascular immunotoxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a safety meta-analysis

AIMS 

The risk and incidence of cardiovascular (CV) immune-related adverse events (irAEs) associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer patients remain unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We systematically reviewed all randomized clinical trials (RCTs) including at least one ICI-containing arm and available CV adverse event (CVAE) data in cancer patients in the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, Medline, and the Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, up to 31 August 2020 (CRD42020165672). The primary outcome was the summary risk of 16 different CVAEs associated with ICI exposure vs. controls (placebo and non-placebo) in RCTs. CVAEs with an increased risk associated with ICI exposure were considered as CV irAEs. Summary incidences of CV irAEs identified in our primary outcome analyses were computed using all RCTs including at least one ICI-containing arm. We used a random-effects meta-analysis to obtain Peto odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and logit transformation and inverse variance weighting to compute summary incidences. Sixty-three unique RCTs with at least one ICI-containing arm (32 518 patients) were retrieved, among which 48 (29 592 patients) had a control arm. Among the 16 CVAEs studied, ICI use was associated with an increased risk of 6 CV irAEs including myocarditis, pericardial diseases, heart failure, dyslipidemia, myocardial infarction, and cerebral arterial ischaemia with higher risks for myocarditis (Peto OR: 4.42, 95% CI: 1.56-12.50, P < 0.01; I2 = 0%, P = 0.93) and dyslipidemia (Peto OR: 3.68, 95% CI: 1.89-7.19, P < 0.01; I2 = 0%, P = 0.66). The incidence of these CVAEs ranged from 3.2 (95% CI 2.0-5.1) to 19.3 (6.7-54.1) per 1000 patients, in studies with a median follow-up ranging from 3.2 to 32.8 months.

CONCLUSION

In RCTs, ICI use was associated with six CV irAEs, not confined to myocarditis and pericarditis.

Thrombotic Complications Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Simple Summary

Patients with cancer commonly develop blood clots, which can cause issues including hospitalizations and complications and can affect cancer treatments. Cancer therapies can be one of the reasons for blood clots. A type of cancer therapy called “immune checkpoint inhibitors” has been used more and more often in recent years for different types of cancer. Recent reports revealed an increasing concern of blood clots related to immune checkpoint inhibitors. In this review, we will summarize data from the available studies and discuss the rates, risk factors, prevention, and treatment strategies for blood clots related to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Abstract

Thromboembolism is a common complication in patients with cancer and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Anticancer treatment is a known risk factor of cancer-associated thrombosis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have become a mainstay of treatment in various cancers. Both venous and arterial thrombosis have been increasingly reported as adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in recent studies, with a cumulative incidence of venous thrombosis to be 5–8% at 6 months and over 10% at 12 months. Additionally, rates of approximately 1–5% for arterial thrombosis were reported at 12 months. Data also showed an association of thromboembolism with adverse survival. Many pertinent clinical questions in this population deserve further investigation, including the risks of thrombosis associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors as compared to those with traditional systemic therapy, associated risk factors, and the optimal prevention and treatment strategies. In this review, we synthesize data from available literature, provide relevant information for clinicians and potential future directions for research.

Poorer baseline performance status is associated with increased thromboembolism risk in metastatic cancer patients treated with immunotherapy

PURPOSE

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. However, the association of VTE with immunotherapy remains poorly defined. We therefore evaluated the frequency of VTE in patients receiving immunotherapy and tried to determine predisposing factors.

METHODS

A total of 133 adult metastatic cancer patients treated with immunotherapy for any cancer between were included. Baseline demographics, ECOG performance status, type of tumors, and baseline blood count parameters were recorded. Possible predisposing factors were evaluated with univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The median age was 60 (interquartile range (IQR) 48-66) years, and the median follow-up was 10.1 (IQR 5.8-18.5) months. Renal cell carcinoma (26.3%) and melanoma (24.1%) were most common diagnoses. Fifteen patients (11.3%) had an episode of VTE. Most of the VTEs were diagnosed as pulmonary emboli (10/15; 67%). Eighty percent (12/15) of these VTE cases were detected incidentally. Patients with a baseline ECOG performance status of 1 or more (29.3% of patients) had a significantly increased risk of venous thrombosis (ECOG ≥1 vs. 0, HR: 3.023, 95% CI: 1.011-9.039, p=0.048). Other factors, including patient age, tumor type, body mass index, baseline thrombocyte, neutrophil, and lactate dehydrogenase levels were not significantly associated with VTE risk.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we observed VTE development in more than 10% of immunotherapy-treated patients and increased VTE risk in patients with poorer ECOG status. With the asymptomatic nature of VTEs in most cases, a high index of suspicion level for VTE is required in patients treated with immunotherapy.

PILE: a candidate prognostic score in cancer patients treated with immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Although the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) became a vital part of cancer care, many patients do not respond to treatment, indicating need for biomarkers. The Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value (PIV) is a recently developed peripheral blood count-based biomarker. Herein, we evaluated a PIV-based candidate scoring system as a prognostic biomarker in ICI-treated patients.

METHODS

A total of 120 advanced cancer patients treated with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 inhibitors for any cancer type were included in this study. The PILE scoring system incorporating the PIV (< median vs. ≥ median), lactate dehydrogenase levels (normal vs. > normal) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0 vs. ≥ 1) was constructed from the multivariate analyses and used for stratification. The association between overall survival (OS), progression-free survival and PILE risk category was evaluated with multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 9.62 months and the median OS of all cohort were 12.42 ± 2.75 months. Patients with higher PIV had significantly decreased OS (7.75 ± 1.64 vs. 18.63 ± 4.26 months, p = 0.037). The patients in the PILE high-risk group (PILE score 2-3) had decreased OS (18.63 ± 4.02 vs. 5.09 ± 1.23 months, HR: 2.317, 95% CI: 1.450-3.700, p < 0.001) and PFS (7.69 ± 1.30 vs. 2.69 ± 0.65 months, HR: 1.931, 95% CI: 1.263-2.954, p = 0.002) compared to PILE low-risk group (PILE score 0-1). The Harrell C-Index values were 0.65 and 0.61 for OS and PFS prediction, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we demonstrated a decreased overall survival in ICI-treated patients with a higher PILE score. If prospective studies validate our results, PILE score could be a biomarker for immunotherapy.

Driver Genes Associated With the Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The association between driver genes and the incidence of thromboembolic events (TEs) in patients diagnosed with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) needs to be quantified to guide clinical management.

METHODS

We interrogated PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane library databases for terms related to venous thromboembolism (VTE) and arterial thromboembolism (ATE) in patients diagnosed with non-small-cell lung cancer harboring driver genes. This search was conducted for studies published between 1 January, 2000 and 31 December, 2020. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to analyze the pooled incidence and odds ratios of VTE in patients with different driver genes.

RESULTS

Of the 2,742 citations identified, a total of 25 studies that included 21,156 patients met eligibility criteria. The overall pooled incidence of VTE in patients with driver genes was 23% (95% CI 18-29). Patients with ROS1 rearrangements had the highest incidence of VTE (37%, 95%CI 23-52). ALK rearrangements were associated with increased VTE risks (OR=2.08,95% CI 1.69-2.55), with the second highest incidence of VTE (27%, 95%CI 20-35). Both groups of patients with EGFR and KRAS mutations did not show a significantly increased risk for VTE (OR=1.33, 95% CI 0.75-2.34; OR=1.31, 95% CI 0.40-4.28).

CONCLUSIONS

ALK rearrangements were shown to be associated with increased VTE risks in patients diagnosed with non-small lung cancer, while there was no significant relation observed between VTE risks and EGFR or KRAS mutations in lung cancer patients.