The prognostic value of mid- and post-treatment [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in indolent follicular lymphoma

Exploratory Study to Evaluate the Impact of Interim PET/CT Assessment in First-Line Follicular Lymphoma

Background/Objectives: This study aimed to determine whether interim PET/CT (iPET) scans could identify follicular lymphoma (FL) patients at high risk of relapse following first-line therapy. Methods: A total of 117 FL patients who underwent iPET scans were included, with responses interpreted using the Deauville score (DS). Progression-free survival (PFS) was evaluated over a median follow-up of 34 months. Results: Overall, 34% of patients were classified as iPET (+), with significantly worse estimated 5-year PFS compared to iPET (-) patients (34% vs. 76%, hazard ratio 4.3, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed iPET (+) as an independent predictor of PFS. Conclusions: Interim PET results are significant predictors of PFS in FL first-line therapy and could inform response-adapted treatment strategies.

Impact of list-mode reconstruction and image-space point spread function correction on PET image contrast and quantitative value using SiPM-based PET/CT system

We evaluate the effects of list-mode reconstruction and the image-space point spread function (iPSF) on the contrast and quantitative values of positron emission tomography (PET) images using a SiPM-PET/CT system. The evaluation is conducted on an NEMA body phantom and clinical images using a Cartesion Prime SiPM-PET/CT system. The signal-to-background ratio (SBR) of the phantom is set to 2, 4, 6, and 8, and all the PET image data are obtained and reconstructed using 3D-OSEM, time-of-flight, iPSF (-/ +), and a 4-mm Gaussian filter with several iterations. The evaluation criteria include % background variability (NB,10 mm), % contrast (QH,10 mm), iPSF change in QH,10 mm (ΔQH,10 mm) for edge artifact evaluation, profile curves, visual evaluation of edge artifacts, clinical imaging for the standardized uptake value (SUV) of lung nodules, and SNRliver. NB,10 mm demonstrates no significant difference in all SBRs with and without iPSF, whereas QH,10 mm is higher based on the SBR with and without iPSF. ΔQH,10 mm indicates increased iterations and a larger rate of change (> 5%) for small spheres of < 17 mm. The profile curves portrayed almost real concentrations, except for the 10-mm sphere of SBR2 without iPSF; however, with iPSF, an overshoot was observed in the 13-mm sphere of all SBRs. The degree of overshoot increased with increasing iteration and SBR. Edge artifacts were detected at values ≥ 17-22 mm in SBRs other than SBR2 with iPSF. Irrespective of the nodal size, SUV and SNRliver improved considerably after iPSF adjustment. Therefore, the effects of list-mode reconstruction and iPSF on PET image contrast were limited, and the overcorrection of the quantitative values was validated using iPSF.

Interim FDG-PET/CT for Response Assessment of Lymphoma

The clinical use and prognostic value of interim FDG-PET/CT (iPET/CT), which is performed after treatment initiation but prior to its completion, varies by lymphoma subtype. Evidence supporting the prognostic value of iPET/CT is more robust for classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), and in this lymphoma subtype, response-adapted treatment approaches guided by iPET/CT are a widely used standard of care for first-line therapy. The data supporting use of iPET/CT among patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is less well-established, but failure to achieve complete metabolic response on iPET/CT is generally considered a poor prognostic factor with likely consequences for progression free survival. This review will present the available evidence supporting use of iPET/CT in lymphoma patients, particularly as it relates to prognostication and the ability to inform response-adapted treatment strategies. The latter will be addressed through a discussion on the major iPET-response adapted clinical trials with mention of ongoing trials. Special attention will be given to cHL and a few subtypes of NHL, including diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL).

Prognostic value of interim 18F-FDG PET/CT in adult follicular lymphoma treated with R-CHOP

PURPOSE

The prognostic value of interim ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT (I-PET) for follicular lymphoma (FL) is controversial, and may be related to the lack of strict standards in terms of age, chemotherapy regimen, and evaluation criteria in previous studies. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of I-PET in adult FL patients treated with R-CHOP.

METHODS

I-PET was performed in 30 adult FL patients after treatment with 3-5 cycles of R-CHOP. PET/CT images were assessed using the Deauville 5-point scale (D-5PS) criteria. Baseline PET/CT (B-PET) was performed in 24 of the patients with FL before treatment. The PET/CT image parameters, such as the SUVmax, TLG, and tMTV, were recorded. The prognostic values of sex, age, grade, Ann Arbor stage, LDH level, and I-PET were evaluated.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression showed that sex, age, grade, Ann Arbor stage, LDH, and I-PET using the D-5PS criteria could not predict the PFS of adult patients with FL treated with R-CHOP (P>0.05). ROC curve analysis evaluated the predictive values of SUVmax, TLG, and tMTV in B-PET and I-PET and showed that none of them was predictive of PFS in adult FL patients (P>0.05). However, the variation in SUVmax (∆SUVmax) was predictive of PFS in adult FL patients (AUC=0.83, P=0.040), and the cutoff threshold was 4.85.

CONCLUSIONS

I-PET using the D-5PS criteria cannot predict the PFS of adult FL patients treated with R-CHOP. However, the ∆SUVmax between B-PET and I-PET is applicable for the prognosis of adult patients with FL.

Clinical application of [18F]FDG PET/CT in follicular lymphoma

The objective of the present paper was to review the clinical application of [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT in follicular lymphoma (FL). Once it was clear that, despite it is characterized as indolent, this type of lymphoma usually shows a high [¹⁸F]FDG avidity, PET/CT became more important and it's now considered the standard technique in staging, re-staging and response evaluation. Many studies have shown its impact on the management of patients (as it can change the stage in a significant proportion of cases and lead to treatment modifications), its superiority over CT (mainly because it's able to distinguish fibrosis in residual masses from viable tumor) and its prognostic value. The latter was initially associated only to the degree of metabolic response, which has proved to be a strong and independent predictive factor in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Thus, a negative PET/CT scan could be considered a guarantee in high-tumor-burden follicular lymphoma patients. However, semiquantitative parameters such as metabolic tumor volume or total lesion glycolysis, may also provide useful information and help us to identify patients with poor prognosis, guiding a risk-adjusted management and follow-up.

Role of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging in the Prediction of Prognosis in Patients With Indolent Lymphoma: Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

The role of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in indolent lymphoma has been minimally studied.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the value of FDG-PET/CT in predicting the prognosis of indolent lymphoma.

METHODS

We prospectively recruited 42 patients with indolent lymphoma. A total of 2 patients were excluded, and 40 underwent baseline PET/CT and follow-up at various time points. A total of 9 patients were observed only, 7 received 4 doses of rituximab alone, and 24 received chemoimmunotherapy. Metabolic response on follow-up PET/CT was assessed using the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and Deauville criteria (DC). We aimed to obtain the best SUVmax and DC to predict optimal survival rates, risk stratification, and optimize therapeutic strategies. The mean follow-up from the initial diagnosis was 33.83 months.

RESULTS

SUVmax <4.35 at interim PET/CT provided the best discrimination, with a progression-free survival (PFS) of 100% and a median survival time of 106.67 months compared with SUVmax ≥4.35 (P=.04), which had a PFS of 43.8% and a median survival time of 50.17 months. This cutoff was also valuable in predicting overall survival at baseline, that is, 100% overall survival with baseline SUVmax <4.35, versus 58.4% for SUVmax ≥4.35 (P=.13). The overall survival of patients with a baseline DC score <3.0 was 100%, with a median overall survival of 106.67 months.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated the utility of PET/CT in indolent lymphomas. SUVmax (<4.35 vs ≥4.35) on interim PET/CT performed best in predicting PFS.

Predictive Value of Interim and End-of-Therapy 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Follicular Lymphoma

PURPOSE

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is the standard imaging modality for response evaluation in FDG-avid lymphoma, but the prognostic value is not established in follicular lymphoma (FL). This study investigated the prognostic value of Deauville 5-point scale (D5PS) from paired interim PET/CT (PETInterim) and end-of-induction therapy PET/CT (PETEOI) in patients with FL.

METHODS

FL staging and response assessment PET/CT images from 2013 to 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. PETInterim was performed 3 or 4 cycles after chemotherapy and PETEOI after 6 or 8 cycles. D5PS scores of 1, 2, and 3 were considered as negative (-), and scores 4 and 5 were considered as positive (+). Statistical analysis was done using Cox regression analysis, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients with set of baseline, interim, and end-of-induction therapy PET/CT studies were included. Ten patients (30.3%) had progression. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 38.8 months (range 3.5-72.7 months). On PETInterim, 23 patients were negative and 10 were positive. On PETEOI scans, 29 patients were negative, and 4 were positive. On multivariate analysis, PETEOI(-) was associated with longer PFS. PETInterim(+) and PETEOI(+) patients had a significantly shorter PFS than PETInterim(-) patients (39.9 months, 95% confidence interval [CI] 23.0-56.9, versus 55.5 months, 95% CI 49.7-61.2, p = 0.005) and PETEOI(-) patients (14.2 months, 95% CI 8.5-19.8, versus 60.5 months, 95% CI 52.1-69.0, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

For patients with FL, PETInterim and PETEOI response is predictive of PFS, and PETEOI(+) is an independent prognostic factor for progression of FL.

Prognostic values of baseline, interim and end-of therapy 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with follicular lymphoma

Purpose

In the present study, we aimed to investigate the role of baseline, interim and end-of treatment positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in assessing the prognosis of follicular lymphoma (FL).

Methods

A total of 84 FL patients were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Baseline (n=59), interim (n=24, after 2–4 cycles) and end-of treatment (n=43) PET/CT images were re-evaluated, and baseline maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max), total metabolic tumor volume (tMTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were recorded. Interim (I-PET) and end-of treatment (E-PET) PET/CT responses were interpreted by Deauville five-point scale (D-5PS) and International Harmonization Project criteria (IHP). Survival curves were calculated by Kaplan-Meier curves, and differences between groups were compared by log-rank test.

Results

The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) of the high- and low-TLG groups was 57.14% and 95.56%, respectively (p=0.0001). The 2-year overall survival (OS) of the high- and low-TLG groups was 62.50% and 100%, respectively (p<0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that TLG was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (p=0.001, HR=6.577, 95% CI=2.167–19.960) and OS (p=0.030, HR=19.291, 95% CI =2.689–137.947). Besides, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) was the independent prognostic factor for OS (HR=8.924, 95% CI=1.273–62.559, p=0.028). Interim PET results based on D-5PS or IHP criteria were not significantly correlated with PFS (all p>0.05). However, E-PET results using D-5PS and IHP criteria were statistically significant (p=0.0001 and p=0.006). The D-5PS showed stronger prognostic value compared with IHP criteria. The optimal cutoff value of ΔSUV_max% was 66.95% according to I-PET and 68.97% according to E-PET. However, only the ΔSUV_max% from the baseline to the end-of therapy yielded statistically significant results in the prediction of PFS (p=0.0002).

Conclusion

Our findings indicated that the baseline TLG and E-PET results were significantly associated with prognosis in patients with FL.

An evidence-based review on the value of interim FDG-PET in assessing response to therapy in lymphoma

Assessing response to therapy in lymphoma is important for determining patients' prognosis, guiding subsequent treatment, and may be used as an outcome measure of prognostic and therapeutic trials. Traditionally, computed tomography was the mainstay for response assessment and was predominantly performed at the end of treatment, whereas the most recent guidelines propose ¹⁸F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) for this purpose. However, the value of FDG-PET performed during treatment (interim FDG-PET) is still a topic of debate. The purpose of this scientific communication is to provide an evidence-based overview of the value of interim FDG-PET in patients with lymphoma. The article first describes the development of imaging-based response assessment in lymphoma, the rationale and limitations of using FDG-PET for this purpose, and continues with the evidence-based clinical utility of interim FDG-PET in three major lymphoma subtypes (Hodgkin lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and follicular lymphoma), and finishes with conclusions and recommendations for standard care and future research.

Post-treatment surveillance imaging in lymphoma

Appropriate post-treatment management of patients with lymphoma has been controversial, with imaging frequently performed as post-treatment surveillance. The goal of post-treatment imaging is to identify relapse prior to clinical symptoms, when the burden of disease is lower and the possibility of effective salvage therapy and cure are greater. However, little data exist to support the performance of surveillance imaging after completion of treatment, with the vast majority of studies suggesting there is no clinical benefit to surveillance imaging in asymptomatic patients. Ongoing efforts seek to identify a subset of patients with a higher risk of relapse that might benefit from surveillance imaging, though financial and other costs associated with imaging are non-negligible and must be considered. Here we summarize the current data regarding post-treatment surveillance imaging in lymphoma.

FDG-PET/CT at the end of immuno-chemotherapy in follicular lymphoma: the prognostic role of the ratio between target lesion and liver SUVmax (rPET)

AIM

To retrospectively investigate the prognostic role of the ratio between target lesion and liver SUV_max (rPET) in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) submitted to FDG-PET/CT at the end of immuno-chemotherapy (PI-PET), and to compare rPET with International Harmonization Project criteria (IHP), Deauville Score (5p-DS) and FL International Prognostic Index at diagnosis (FLIPI).

METHODS

Eighty-nine patients with FL undergoing PI-PET were evaluated. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) approach was applied to identify the optimal cut-point of rPET with respect to 5-years progression free survival (PFS). The prognostic significance of rPET was compared with IHP, DS and FLIPI. Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated using the presence of adverse events as gold standard.

RESULTS

The ROC analysis for rPET as predictor of progression showed an optimal rPET cut-point of 0.98. Patients with positive values of IHP, DS and rPET had a PFS of 50, 30 and 31%. PPV were of 56, 80 and 80%, NPV of 83, 86 and 88%, respectively. DS and rPET differed only in two patients. FLIPI was not predictive of progression and relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

rPET is a prognostic factor in patients with FL submitted to PI-PET. Although it has a similar prognostic power as DS, it can have methodological advantages over visual analysis. PI-PET with different evaluation systems has a stronger prognostic power than FLIPI at diagnosis, so it could be useful to identify patients with FL at risk for early relapse after immuno-chemotherapy.

Current prognostic and predictive factors in follicular lymphoma

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is generally considered an indolent disorder. With modern day treatments, long remissions are often achieved both in the front-line and relapsed setting. However, a subset of patients has a more aggressive course and a worse outcome. Their identification is the main purpose of modern day prognostic tools. In this review, we attempt to summarize the evidence concerning prognostic and predictive factors in FL, including (1) pre-treatment factors, from baseline clinical characteristics and imaging tests to histological grade, the microenvironment and genomic abnormalities; (2) post-treatment factors, i.e., depth of response, measured both by imaging tests and minimal residual disease; (3) factors at relapse and duration of response; and (4) prognostic factors in histological transformation. We conclude that, despite the existence of numerous tools, the availability of some of them is still limited; they generally suffer from notable downsides, and most have unproven predictive value, thus having scarce bearing on the choice of regimen at present. However, with the technological and scientific developments of the last few years, the potential for these prognostic factors is promising, particularly in combination, which will probably, in time, help guide therapeutic decisions.

FDG-PET Scan: a new Paradigm for Follicular Lymphoma Management

In the present review, the reader will be led to the most relevant observations that prompted oncologists and haematologist to consider FDG-PET/CT as a new paradigm for FL management in clinical practice. The role of functional imaging in lymphoma staging, restaging, prognostication, and metabolic tumour volume computing will be reviewed in detail. Moreover, a special focus will be addressed to technical and practical aspects of PET scan reporting, which have been set during the last decade to ensure the reproducibility of the therapeutic results. Finally, the predictive role of PET/CT on long-term treatment outcome will be compared with another well-known prognosticator as minimal residual disease (MRD) detection by Immunoglobulin gene rearrangement assessment.

[Accuracy of Resolution Recovery in PSF-based Fully-3D PET Image Reconstruction: Simulation and Phantom Study in Multicenter Trial]

PURPOSE

Recently, the quality of positron emission tomography (PET) images has rapidly improved using resolution recovery algorithm with point spread function (PSF). The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of the resolution recovery algorithm using three different PET systems.

METHODS

Three PET scanner models, the GE Discovery 600 M (D600M), SIEMENS Biograph mCT (mCT), and SHIMADZU SET-3000GCT/X (3000GCT) were used in this study. The radial dependences of spatial resolution (full width at half maximum: FWHM) were obtained by point source measurements (0.9 mmφ). All PET data were acquired in three-dimensional (3D) mode and reconstructed using the filtered back projection (FBP) , 3D-ordered subsets expectation maximization (3D-OSEM or dynamic row-action maximum likelihood algorithm) , and 3D-OSEM+PSF (PSF) algorithms. Two indicators, aspect ratio (ASR) and resolution recovery ratio (RRR), were calculated from measured FWHMs and compared among the three PET scanners.

RESULTS

In D600 and 3000GCT, distortions of the radial direction were slightly increased at circumference of field of view (FOV). On the other hand, random distortions were occurred in both radial and tangential direction in mCT. ASRs calculated from 3D-OSEM images at circumference of FOV were 2.06, 1.22, and 2.04 on D600M, mCT, and 3000GCT, respectively. ASR improved with PSF in all PET scanners. On the other hand, RRR with PSF were calculated 57.6%, 61.4%, and 31.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the spatial resolutions of PET images could be improved with PSF algorithm in all PET systems; however, effect of PSF was different depending on PET systems. Furthermore, PSF algorithm could not completely improve spatial resolutions in circumference of FOV.

Prognostic value of interim and end-of-treatment FDG-PET in follicular lymphoma: a systematic review

This study aimed to systematically review the prognostic value of interim and end-of-treatment (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in follicular lymphoma during and after first-line therapy. The PubMed/MEDLINE database was searched for relevant original studies. Included studies were methodologically assessed, and their results were extracted and descriptively analyzed. Three studies on the prognostic value of interim FDG-PET and eight studies on the prognostic value of end-of-treatment FDG-PET were included. Overall, studies were of poor methodological quality. In addition, there was incomplete reporting of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) data by several studies, and none of the studies incorporated the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) in the OS analyses. Two studies reported no significant difference in PFS between interim FDG-PET positive and negative patients, whereas one study reported a significant difference in PFS between the two groups. Two studies reported no significant difference in OS between interim FDG-PET positive and negative patients. Five studies reported end-of-treatment FDG-PET positive patients to have a significantly worse PFS than end-of-treatment FDG-PET negative patients, and one study reported a non-significant trend towards a worse PFS for end-of-treatment FDG-PET positive patients. Three studies reported end-of-treatment FDG-PET positive patients to have a significantly worse OS than end-of-treatment FDG-PET negative patients. In conclusion, the available evidence does not support the use of interim FDG-PET in follicular lymphoma. Although published studies suggest end-of-treatment FDG-PET to be predictive of PFS and OS, they suffer from numerous biases and failure to correct OS prediction for the FLIPI.