Comparison of ultrasonography features and malignancy rate of toxic and nontoxic autonomous nodules: a preliminary study

Radioiodine treatment outcome by dosimetric parameters and renal function in hyperthyroidism

Background

Hyperthyroidism has been treated with radioiodine therapy for eight decades, with known benefits and side-effects. No consensus exists on which activity dosage and pre-therapeutic measurements are required for optimal treatment, balancing risk of incomplete response, therapy-induced hypothyroidism and radiation exposure. A retrospective analysis was performed to assess these questions.

Methods

Data was collected on radioiodine treatment outcomes for 904 patients treated for Graves' disease or toxic nodular goitres at our institution during 2016–2020. The prescribed absorbed doses were 120 Gy (Graves’ disease), 200 Gy (toxic multinodular goitre) and 300 Gy (solitary toxic adenoma). Univariate analysis and multivariate regression modelling were used to find factors linked to treatment outcome.

Results

The cure rate of hyperthyroidism after one administration of radioiodine was 79% for Graves' disease, 94% for toxic multinodular goitre and 98% for solitary toxic adenoma. Thyroid mass, uptake and effective half-life were all significantly associated with cure in Graves’ disease, but not in toxic multinodular goitre. The rates of therapy-induced hypothyroidism were 20% and 29% for toxic multinodular goitre and solitary toxic adenoma. Neither the cure rate nor the hypothyroidism rate was found to be superior among patients with individualised effective half-life measurements in toxic nodular goitres. Poor renal function was associated with dubious iodine uptake measurements but was not found to correlate with worse outcome.

Conclusions

Multiple measurements of individual iodine uptake for kinetics estimation may be unnecessary, and a population-based value can be used instead. Patients with renal impairment had similar outcome as other patients, but with a higher risk of dubious uptake measurements.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13044-022-00126-4.

Malignancy risk of hyperfunctioning thyroid nodules compared with non-toxic nodules: systematic review and a meta-analysis

Background

Hyperfunctioning or hot nodules are thought to be rarely malignant. As such, current guidelines recommend that hot nodules be excluded from further malignancy risk stratification. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the malignancy risk in hot nodules and non-toxic nodules in observational studies.

Methods

Ovid MEDLINE Daily and Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched. Observational studies which met all of the following were included: (1) use thyroid scintigraphy for nodule assessment, (2) inclusion of both hyperfunctioning and non-functioning nodules based on scintigraphy, (3) available postoperative histopathologic nodule results, (4) published up to November 12, 2020 in either English or French. The following data was extracted: malignancy outcomes include malignancy rate, mapping of the carcinoma within the hot nodule, inclusion of microcarcinomas, and presence of gene mutations.

Results

Among the seven included studies, overall incidence of malignancy in all hot thyroid nodules ranged from 5 to 100% in comparison with non-toxic nodules, 3.8–46%. Odds of malignancy were also compared between hot and non-toxic thyroid nodules, separated into solitary nodules, multiple nodules and combination of the two. Pooled odds ratio (OR) of solitary thyroid nodules revealed a single hot nodule OR of 0.38 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25, 0.59), toxic multinodular goiter OR of 0.51 (95% CI 0.34, 0.75), and a combined hot nodule OR of 0.45 (95% CI 0.31, 0.65). The odds of malignancy are reduced by 55% in hot nodules; however, the incidence was not zero.

Conclusions

Odds of malignancy of hot nodules is reduced compared with non-toxic nodules; however, the incidence of malignancy reported in hot nodules was higher than expected. These findings highlight the need for further studies into the malignancy risk of hot nodules.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13044-021-00094-1.

Thyroid scintigraphy in the era of fine-needle aspiration cytology

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether thyroid scintigraphy would alter the clinical management of patients referred for fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNA).

METHODS

We reviewed the medical and imaging records of patients referred to our Department between 2016 and 2019. All the patients had to take a serum thyrotropin test administered in our hospital at least two months before the FNA; where the TSH level was ≤1.5 mIU/L, the patients were subjected to a scan and subsequently to FNA, where indicated. We selected only healthy patients with no previous history of thyroid disease, who were not taking any drugs and who had a TSH level of ≤1.5 mIU/L. We excluded patients with multinodular goitre.

RESULTS

A total of 176 patients were analysed. A total of 67/176 patients (38%) showed a serum of TSH ≤ 0.27 mIU/L. Scintigraphy identified a hot nodule in 142 lesions (80.7%), a warm nodule in 8 lesions (4.5%) and a cold nodule in 26 lesions (14.8%). The ROC curve analysis indicated that a TSH value of ≤0.42 mIU/L identified patients with hyperfunctioning nodules with a sensitivity of 65% and a specificity of 77%. All patients with cold and warm nodules were submitted to FNA: 22/26 (85%) and 5/8 (63%) lesions showed suspected malignancy or were compatible with malignancy, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Speculating on our data, if we had subjected our patients to FNA as indicated by the 2015 ATA guidelines, we would have subjected 117 patients to cytology, from whom 83 had undetected hot nodules. Conversely, by adopting scintigraphy for all patients with TSH ≤ 1.5 mIU/L, 109 patients have avoided FNA. However, our study was performed in a region with a history of mild iodine deficiency. Therefore, we cannot claim that our observation is valid for patients born and living in areas with sufficient iodine uptake. We recommend thyroid scintigraphy for treating single thyroid nodules in euthyroid patients born and living in regions with an iodine deficiency, when TSH levels are below 1.5 mIU/L before FNA.

The value of ultrasonography for the indication of fine-needle aspiration in autonomous thyroid nodules

BACKGROUND

The risk of malignancy in autonomous thyroid nodules is considered to be very low in adults and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is not recommended in these cases; however, some studies contest this. Just as ultrasonography (US) has been used to select nonautonomous nodules with initial benign cytology that deserve FNA repetition, this method may also be useful to select autonomous nodules that are candidates for FNA.

METHODS

In this prospective study, FNA was obtained in 48 adults patients with autonomous solitary nodules >1 cm with suspicious US features (at least two of the following findings: hypoechogenicity, microcalcification, irregular margins, taller than wider shape, predominantly or exclusively central vascularization).

RESULTS

Cytology was benign in 28 patients (58.3%). Six patients (12.5%) had nondiagnostic cytology and histology revealed benign nodules in these cases. Cytology was indeterminate in nine other patients (18.5%). Of these, seven were adenomas and two were follicular carcinomas on histology. Finally, cytology suspicious for malignancy or malignant cytology was detected in five patients (10.4%), all of them confirmed histologically to be papillary carcinomas (the follicular variant in three). Thus, the frequency of malignancy was 14.6% (two follicular carcinomas and five papillary carcinomas), 8.3% in nodules with two suspicious findings vs 33.3% in nodules with ≥3 suspicious findings (P = .055).

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that the presence of ultrasonographic findings suspicious for malignancy in autonomous thyroid nodules >1 cm is a criterion for the indication of FNA.

Is there still a role for thyroid scintigraphy in the workup of a thyroid nodule in the era of fine needle aspiration cytology and molecular testing?

Thyroid scintigraphy is now rarely used in the work-up of a thyroid nodule except in the presence of a low TSH value. Therefore, autonomously functioning thyroid nodules (AFTNs) with a normal TSH value are diagnosed only in the rare medical centers that continue to use thyroid scan systematically in the presence of a thyroid nodule. In this review, we discuss the prevalence of AFTN with a normal TSH level and the possible consequences of performing fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in an undiagnosed AFTN. We also discuss the risk of malignant AFTN which may be higher than previously stated.

A Rare Presentation of Autonomously Functioning Papillary Thyroid Cancer: Malignancy in Marine-Lenhart Syndrome Nodule

Objective. Marine-Lenhart Syndrome (MLS) is defined as concomitant occurrence of autonomously functioning thyroid nodule (AFTN) with Graves' disease (GD). Malignancy in a functional nodule is rare. We aimed to present an extremely rare case of papillary thyroid cancer in a MLS nodule with lateral lymph node metastases. Case. A 43-year-old male presented with hyperthyroidism and Graves' ophthalmopathy. On Tc99m pertechnetate scintigraphy, a hyperactive nodule in the left upper thyroid pole was detected and the remaining tissue showed a mildly increased uptake. The ultrasonography demonstrated 15.5 × 13.5 × 12 mm sized hypoechoic nodule in the left upper pole of the thyroid and round lymph nodes on the left side of the neck. Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of the nodule and lymph node revealed cytological findings consistent with papillary cancer. Total thyroidectomy with central and left modified radical neck dissection was performed. On pathologic examination, two foci of micropapillary cancer were detected. The skip metastases were present in three lymph nodes on the neck. Conclusion. AFTN can be seen rarely in association with GD. It is not possible to exclude malignancy due to the clinical and imaging findings. In the presence of suspicious clinical and sonographic features, FNAB should be performed.