Éradication d’H. pylori dans les ulcères bulbaires: quelle trithérapie de première intention? Résultats d’une étude prospective randomisée comparant le métronidazole à la clarithromycine

Proton-pump inhibitor and amoxicillin-based triple therapy containing clarithromycin versus metronidazole for Helicobacter pylori: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is one of the important risk factors of gastric related diseases and antibiotic therapy has become an effective treatment. At present, proton-pump inhibitor and amoxicillin-based triple therapy, including clarithromycin (PAC) and metronidazole (PAM), are two commonly used first-line therapies for H. pylori infection, which has a high incidence and possibly poor prognosis worldwide.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed using the databases PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Ovid Medline, Science Direct, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science. Only randomized clinical trials with full texts published were included.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies involving 3264 patients were included. The pooled risk ratios (RR) between the PAC and PAM groups were comparable in the intention-to-treat (ITT) eradication rates (71.0% versus 75.2%, RR = 0.96, p = 0.38) and per-protocol (PP) eradication rates (79.6% versus 80.1%, RR = 1.02, p = 0.65). PAM is highly effective in clarithromycin-resistant cases (70.4% versus 48.2%, RR = 0.65, p = 0.002) and that PAC showed significant efficacy in metronidazole-resistant cases (87.3% versus 58.6%, RR = 1.43, p = 0.0006). In subgroup analysis, when using low-dose PPI, the PAM group showed greater efficacy than the PAC group. Furthermore, we found that PAM showed higher effectiveness in the studies published in recent years, especially for people over 60 years old (RR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.71-0.89, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In general, both PAC and PAM regimens were effective and comparable in eradicating H. pylori. However, the PAM regimen showed greater efficacy than the PAC regimen in recent years, especially for people over 60 years old.

Helicobacter pylori treatment: New perspectives using current experience

Infection with Helicobacter pylori plays an essential role in the development of duodenal and gastric ulcers as well as in the pathobiology of gastric adenocarcinoma. Thus, successful elimination of the bacterium can reduce the risk of development of these diseases. Currently, most guidelines recommend standard triple therapy (amoxicillin+clarithromycin+proton pump inhibitor), although its efficacy is rapidly falling. Notably, traditional first-line therapy fails in almost 32% of H. pylori-carrying cases, suggesting the importance of choosing the best formulation for first-line therapy. Hence, due to the decreasing effectiveness of first-line treatment, we should be prepared to confront increasing H. pylori therapeutic defeat. Owing to increasing reports of antibiotic resistance worldwide, newer approaches and directions are necessary for managing this problematic infection. Developing and providing better anti-H. pylori strategies (probiotics, antibiotic therapy and non-traditional medicine) without using current clinical experience in treating the infection is impossible. Furthermore, development and examination of new preventive vaccines may also be a new therapeutic direction. Taken together, with regard to current experience, clinicians are highly recommended to consider all alternatives to eradicate H. pylori until a universal vaccine becomes practically available. This article aims to give an overview regarding the current status of H. pylori treatment, accordingly designing an actual overview to gain optimal strategies against this infection.